DOCSLIB.ORG

A Strategy for England's Wildlife and Ecosystem Services Indicators Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Strategy for England's Wildlife and Ecosystem Services Indicators Summary www.gov.uk/defra Biodiversity 2020: a strategy for England's wildlife and ecosystem services Indicators summary December 2014 1 © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected] This document/publication is also available on our website at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/england-biodiversity-indicators Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] or Biodiversity Statistics team Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR PB 14226 Picture acknowledgments (left to right from top) Bumblebee on Viper's Bugloss, Echium vulgare. © Natural England/Allan Drewitt 2014 View over Bassenthwaite, Cumbria. © Natural England/Peter Wakely 1996 Walkers on Shapwick Heath, Somerset. © Natural England/Paul Glendell 2002 Grey Plover, Pluvialis squatarola. © Natural England/Allan Drewitt 2014 2 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................5 Overview of assessment of change for all indicators .............................................................7 1. Extent and condition of protected areas .......................................................................... 15 2a. Status of threatened habitats ......................................................................................... 18 2b. Status of threatened habitats: habitats of European importance ................................... 20 3. Habitat connectivity in the wider countryside ................................................................... 21 4a. Status of threatened species ......................................................................................... 22 4b. Status of threatened species ......................................................................................... 24 5. Species in the wider countryside: farmland ..................................................................... 25 6. Species in the wider countryside: woodland .................................................................... 29 7. Species in the wider countryside: wetlands ..................................................................... 32 8. Species in the wider marine environment ........................................................................ 34 9. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: removal of greenhouse gases by forests in England ............................................................................................................................................ 35 10. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: experimental statistic on the status of pollinating insects – bees ...................................................................................................................... 36 11. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: marine (fish size in the North-western North Sea) ............................................................................................................................................ 37 12a. Genetic resources for food and agriculture .................................................................. 38 12b. Genetic resources for food and agriculture .................................................................. 39 13. Awareness, understanding and support for conservation .............................................. 41 14. Taking action for the natural environment ...................................................................... 43 15. Funding for biodiversity ................................................................................................. 45 16. Integrating biodiversity considerations into local decision making ................................ 47 17. Global biodiversity impacts of UK consumption ............................................................. 48 3 18. Climate change impacts and adaptation ........................................................................ 49 19. Trends in pressures on biodiversity – pollution .............................................................. 50 20. Trends in pressures on biodiversity – invasive species ................................................. 52 21. Trends in pressures on biodiversity – surface water status .......................................... 53 22. Agricultural and forest area in environmental management schemes .......................... 54 23. Sustainable fisheries: fish stocks harvested within safe limits ....................................... 58 24. Biodiversity data and information for decision making ................................................... 59 Enquiries about indicators or this publication ....................................................................... 60 Annex 1. Biodiversity 2020 Outcomes and Themes ............................................................ 61 Annex 2. International Goals and Targets ........................................................................... 63 Annex 3. National Statistics ................................................................................................ 67 Annex 4. Confidence in trends and assessments ................................................................ 68 4 Introduction Biodiversity is the variety of all life on Earth. It includes all species of animals and plants, and the natural systems that support them. Biodiversity matters because it supports the vital benefits we get from the natural environment. It contributes to our economy, our health and wellbeing, and it enriches our lives. In 2011, the government published Biodiversity 2020: a strategy for England’s wildlife and ecosystem services. This new, ambitious biodiversity strategy for England built on the Natural Environment White Paper and provided a comprehensive picture of how we are implementing our international and EU commitments. It set out the strategic direction for biodiversity policy for the next decade on land (including rivers and lakes) and at sea. It built on the successful work that has gone before, but sought to deliver a real step change. Biodiversity 2020 also included plans to develop and publish a compact set of indicators to assess progress with delivery of the strategy. They were to be outcome-focused with an emphasis on indicators showing the status of components of biodiversity and with additional response and pressure indicators to show progress with the priority actions set out in the strategy. The government’s previous biodiversity indicator set was reviewed in 2011 to ensure that it continued to be based on the most robust and reliable available data. Some refinements to existing indicators were identified to improve their relevance, make them easier to understand, or address concerns over data quality or availability. Where the review identified gaps where there were no indicators for particular outcomes or actions in the Strategy, or where the existing indicators were only indirectly linked to outcomes, development work has been identified to fill these gaps. The set remains relevant to the new Strategy and to the new international framework of ‘Aichi’ targets1 agreed under the Convention on Biological Diversity. In 2012 a new set of 24 Biodiversity 2020 indicators was published. In this 2014 publication, where possible each of the indicators has been revised or updated with the most recent data. In some cases work to fill gaps or improve indicators is ongoing and the work planned to further refine or deliver indicators is described briefly. The indicators may be subject to further review, particularly as the reporting requirements for the EU Biodiversity Strategy and the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive are clarified. The Biodiversity 2020 indicators are dependent on a wide variety of data, provided by Government, research bodies, and the voluntary sector. As Official Statistics, the presentation and assessment of the indicators has been verified by the data providers, and the production and editing of the indicators has been overseen by Government statisticians in Defra. For details of National Statistics designation see Annex 3. At the 8th Biodiversity Indicators Forum, a recommendation was made to publish a transparent statement of the level of confidence that can be ascribed to each individual indicator. The Biodiversity Indicators Working group (Defra and JNCC) have undertaken a preliminary assessment (see Annex 4), which will be amended during 2015. 1. The UK Government is a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and is committed to the new biodiversity goals and targets ‘the Aichi targets’ agreed in 2010 and set out in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. 5 Assessing indicators Each indicator is composed of one or more measures which will show trends over time. Many indicators have a single measure, but where data cannot be combined logically the indicator will have more than one measure. Each measure is summarised or assessed separately using a set of ‘traffic lights’. The traffic lights show ‘change over time’. They do not show whether the measure has reached any published or implied targets, or indeed whether the status is ‘good’ or ‘bad’, although where
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nordmann's Greenshank Population Analysis, at Pantai Cemara Jambi
    Final Report Nordmann’s Greenshank Population Analysis, at Pantai Cemara Jambi Cipto Dwi Handono1, Ragil Siti Rihadini1, Iwan Febrianto1 and Ahmad Zulfikar Abdullah1 1Yayasan Ekologi Satwa Alam Liar Indonesia (Yayasan EKSAI/EKSAI Foundation) Surabaya, Indonesia Background Many shorebirds species have declined along East Asian-Australasian Flyway which support the highest diversity of shorebirds in the world, including the globally endangered species, Nordmann’s Greenshank. Nordmann’s Greenshank listed as endangered in the IUCN Red list of Threatened Species because of its small and declining population (BirdLife International, 2016). It’s one of the world’s most threatened shorebirds, is confined to the East Asian–Australasian Flyway (Bamford et al. 2008, BirdLife International 2001, 2012). Its global population is estimated at 500–1,000, with an estimated 100 in Malaysia, 100–200 in Thailand, 100 in Myanmar, plus unknown but low numbers in NE India, Bangladesh and Sumatra (Wetlands International 2006). The population is suspected to be rapidly decreasing due to coastal wetland development throughout Asia for industry, infrastructure and aquaculture, and the degradation of its breeding habitat in Russia by grazing Reindeer Rangifer tarandus (BirdLife International 2012). Mostly Nordmann’s Greenshanks have been recorded in very small numbers throughout Southeast Asia, and there are few places where it has been reported regularly. In Myanmar, for example, it was rediscovered after a gap of almost 129 years. The total count recorded by the Asian Waterbird Census (AWC) in 2006 for Myanmar was 28 birds with 14 being the largest number at a single locality (Naing 2007). In 2011–2012, Nordmann’s Greenshank was found three times in Sumatera Utara province, N Sumatra.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • 08 Checklist of Species
    Please note that the List below is in the sequence used in the Derbyshire Bird Report , but the monthly Bulletin BIRD NOTES will remain in the previous Voous Order pro tem . When submitting record slips, please use the EURING NUMBER shown after each species. This will greatly aid writing the Bird Notes and inputting into the computer database. The list uses British vernacular names as column 1 in the BOU BRITISH LIST A CHECKLIST of SPECIES RECORDED in DERBYSHIRE MUTE SWAN 0152 MONTAGU'S HARRIER 0263 GREAT BLACK-BACKED GULL 0600 DARTFORD WARBLER 1262 BEWICK'S SWAN 0153 GOSHAWK 0267 SOOTY TERN 0623 GRASSHOPPER WARBLER 1236 WHOOPER SWAN 0154 SPARROWHAWK 0269 LITTLE TERN 0624 SAVI'S WARBLER 1238 BEAN GOOSE 0157 BUZZARD 0287 GULL-BILLED TERN 0605 AQUATIC WARBLER 1242 PINK-FOOTED GOOSE 0158 ROUGH-LEGGED BUZZARD 0290 CASPIAN TERN 0606 SEDGE WARBLER 1243 WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE 0159 GOLDEN EAGLE 0296 WHISKERED TERN 0626 MARSH WARBLER 1250 LESSER WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE 0160 OSPREY 0301 BLACK TERN 0627 REED WARBLER 1251 GREYLAG GOOSE 0161 KESTREL 0304 WHITE-WINGED BLACK TERN 0628 GREAT REED WARBLER 1253 CANADA GOOSE 0166 RED-FOOTED FALCON 0307 SANDWICH TERN 0611 BARNACLE GOOSE 0167 MERLIN 0309 COMMON TERN 0615 WAXWING 1048 BRENT GOOSE 0168 HOBBY 0310 ROSEATE TERN 0614 NUTHATCH 1479 EGYPTIAN GOOSE 0170 PEREGRINE 0320 ARCTIC TERN 0616 TREECREEPER 1486 RUDDY SHELDUCK 0171 RAZORBILL 0636 WREN 1066 SHELDUCK 0173 WATER RAIL 0407 LITTLE AUK 0647 STARLING 1582 MANDARIN DUCK 0178 SPOTTED CRAKE 0408 PUFFIN 0654 ROSE-COLOURED STARLING 1584 WIGEON 0179 CORNCRAKE
    [Show full text]
  • Kotin 2018 Birdathon
    Kotin 2018 Birdathon Day One -- Friday May 5 Allan and Muriel Kotin's 2018 Birdathon: Today was not only the Cinco de Mayo, it was the start of the Kotin Birdathon. This is our annual 24-hour search for as many species of birds as we can find and identify and is dedicated to raising money for San Fernando Valley Audubon's Sepulveda Basin Environmental Education Program (SBEEP). Allan and I left home in my small Lexus SUV (license MALBRDR the BRDR for “birder” and the MAL for “Malibu” or “bad” – your choice) around 10:20 this morning and drove to Orange County, aiming to be ready to bird there around noon when we would start the clock running. The plan was to drive home in the dark and resume birding the next morning in Los Angeles County until exactly 24 hours later. We devised this unique schedule a few years ago, abandoning the typical – and even more exhausting -- pattern of starting before dawn and ending at dark in a single day. Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve in Huntington Beach: We arrived at this wonderful birding hotspot where we found screeching terns filling the sky. Ignoring them for the moment, we hung our binoculars around our necks, secured our sun hats on our heads, and further loaded up Allan with camera and spotting scope. Ready… Set… Bird! At 12:04PM the 24-hour clock was started. The skies were hazy and partly cloudy with a light breeze and temperature 69F. The first bird identified was one of many Forster’s Terns.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Black-Bellied Plover
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group BLACK-BELLIED PLOVER Pluvialis squatarola Family: CHARADRIIDAE Order: CHARADRIIFORMES Class: AVES B151 Written by: C. Swarth Reviewed by: L. Mewaldt Edited by: S. Granholm, R. Duke DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY Common to abundant migrant and winter visitant in California from mid-July to mid-May on intertidal mudflats of estuarine habitats, on coastal lowland habitats, and in the Central Valley. Recorded nearly all year at Salton Sea. During spring (late March to mid-May) and fall (late July to mid-October) migration, uncommon to fairly common in the Great Basin. In southern California, rare migrant away from coast and Salton Sea. (Cogswell 1977, McCaskie et al. 1979, Garrett and Dunn 1981). Small numbers of non-breeders found in summer, especially in southern California. On the coast, forages primarily on intertidal mudflats, but also occurs on rocky intertidal and sandy-beach marine habitats, and on nearby pasture and wet meadow habitats. Away from the coast, occurs on plowed fields, short grasslands, wet meadows, and the shores of riverine, estuarine and lacustrine habitats. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Forages in typical plover fashion by running a short distance, then halting abruptly and pecking quickly at the surface of the substrate. Commonly feeds at night. Diet in estuarine mudflats during the non-breeding season includes polychaete worms, small mollusks, and crustaceans, and insects (Bent 1929). On San Francisco Bay, apparently takes many mud snails (Recher 1966). At high tide, feeding occurs upland in plowed field, pastures, and grasslands.
    [Show full text]
  • Nocturnal Foraging Behavior of Breeding Piping Plovers (Charadrius Melodus) in New Jersey
    The Auk 111(3):579-587, 1994 NOCTURNAL FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF BREEDING PIPING PLOVERS (CHARADRIUS MELODUS) IN NEW JERSEY KEVIN J. STAINE AND JOANNA BURGER Departmentof BiologicalSciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey08855, USA ABSTRACT.--Thenocturnal foraging behavior of breeding Piping Plovers (Charadriusmel- odus)was studied in New Jerseyusing a focal-animalapproach in 1989and 1990.More than 30% of the variation in the number of plovers foraging at night was explained by stageof the breeding cycle,tidal stage,and year. The greatestnumbers of adult ploversfed in the intertidal zone during the prenestingand fledgling stagesof the breeding cycle. Piping Ploverswere more likely to be observedfeeding during late ebb and early flood tides,than other times. Time devoted to feeding per 2-rain sample was similar at each study site but differed significantlyduring the tidal stages.Pecking rate was higher during late ebb and early flood tides than late flood and early ebb tides. Time devotedto being alert varied dependingon stageof the breedingcycle. Prenesting plovers and individualswith fledglings fed longerand were alert lessper 2-rain samplethan ploversengaged in incubationor brood rearing. The nocturnal peck rate of Piping Plovers was considerablylower than daytime levels.Plovers foraging at night had significantlylower peck rateswhen disturbed.Abun- dance of intertidal polychaetesvaried accordingto tidal stage and, where present,they constitutedthe main food of the plovers. We suggestthat nocturnal foraging is a natural behavior pattern in Piping Ploversalthough it may vary in intensity. Future management should include the assessmentof nighttime recreationaluse of beacheswhere Piping Plovers breed.Received 31 July1992, accepted 25 November1992. ALTHOUGHSOME BIRDS, such as many species that shorebirdscannot obtain enough calories of owls, are nocturnal, most are diurnal and during the short daysat thesetimes (Goss-Cus- perform all their activitiesduring the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Site Quality for Shorebird Communities: a Case Study on the Humber Estuary, UK
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 305: 203–217, 2005 Published December 23 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Predicting site quality for shorebird communities: a case study on the Humber estuary, UK Richard A. Stillman1,*, Andrew D. West1, John D. Goss-Custard1, Selwyn McGrorty1, Natalie J. Frost2, Donald J. Morrisey2, 3, Andrew J. Kenny2, 4, Allan L. Drewitt5 1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Dorset, Winfrith Technology Centre, Winfrith Newburgh, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, UK 2ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd, Pathfinder House, Maritime Way, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 3AE, UK 3National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, PO Box 893, Nelson, New Zealand 4Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Burnham Laboratory, Remembrance Avenue, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex CM0 8HA, UK 5English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE1 1UA, UK ABSTRACT: The conservation importance of estuaries is often measured by bird numbers, but mon- itoring numbers is not necessarily a reliable way of assessing changes in site quality. We used an indi- vidual-based model, comprised of fitness-maximising individuals, to assess the quality of the Humber estuary, UK, for 9 shorebirds; dunlin Calidris alpina, common ringed plover Charadrius hiaticula, red knot Calidris canutus, common redshank Tringa totanus, grey plover Pluvialis squatarola, black- tailed godwit Limosa limosa, bar-tailed godwit L. lapponica, Eurasian oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus and Eurasian curlew Numenius arquata. We measured site quality as predicted overwin- ter survival. The model accurately predicted the observed shorebird distribution (if non-starving birds were assumed to feed on any prey or patch on which intake rate equalled or exceeded their requirements), and the diets of most species.
    [Show full text]
  • First Sighting Record of Grey Plover (Pluvialis Squatarola) Or Black Bellied Plover in Vidarbha Region of Maharashtra
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH Journal homepage: www.jakraya.com/journal/jwr STUDY REPORT First Sighting Record of Grey Plover ( Pluvialis squatarola ) or Black Bellied Plover in Vidarbha Region of Maharashtra Shishir M Shendokar Wildlife and Environment Conservation Society, 42, Green park colony, Shegaon road, Amravati, Maharashtra, India. Abstract *Corresponding Author: We sighted Grey Plover ( Pluvialis squatarola ) at Dagadparwa Shishir M Shendokar reservoir near Akola, Maharashtra. The grey plover spotted during study of Email: [email protected] migration of birds. I have discussed the rarity of plover in inland because the plover is long distance migrant only found at shores. In this research Received: 19/04/2017 note I have discussed the migration route and threats in migration route of Accepted: 14/06/2017 this plover. Keywords : Grey Plover, Pluvialis squatarola , Sighting record of Grey Plover. The Grey Plover ( Pluvialis squatarola ), also Dagadparwa Reservoir (20.533 N-77.083 E) is known as the Black bellied plover in North America. It located 19 kms away from Akola city. The reservoir is is a medium sized plover breeding in Arctic regions. It surrounded by crop and cultivated land. On 3 rd is long distance migrant, with nearly worldwide costal December, 2014 the day was dark, cloudy and humid distribution when not breeding. (Birdlife international, than routine daily climate, while birding at 2012). Preparation for migration, in spring and summer Dagadparwa Reservoir I saw a bird which confused the adult are spotted black and white on the back me. In the mudflats of reservoir, I sighted a small wings. The face and neck are black with a white medium sized plover like bird resting on the muddy border, they have a black breast and belly and a white island, slowly I tried to go closer to the bird to get good rump.
    [Show full text]
  • Grey Plover Young Individuals on Their First Southwards Migration
    388 Charadriidae: plovers Birds occurring on wetlands in the interior are mostly Grey Plover young individuals on their first southwards migration. As in Grysstrandkiewiet other parts of Africa, most inland records in southern Africa are for late spring and early summer when first-year birds are Pluvialis squatarola on passage (Dowsett 1980a; Irwin 1981). Because the proportion overwintering in southern Africa The Grey Plover is a nonbreeding Palearctic migrant in south- is one of the highest of all waders (Summers et al. 1995), and ern Africa. It breeds in arctic tundra from the White Sea in a few are present during the austral winter at most estuaries northwestern Europe, across Asia to Canada, but is absent where they occur in flocks in summer, the models do not from Greenland and Fennoscandia (Hayman et al. 1986). depict the relative seasonal densities well. Regular counts at Those breeding in Siberia spend the northern winter in estuaries and on the shore show that arrival in the region is Europe, Africa, Asia and Australasia; the size of this popu- in September and departure in April (e.g. Pringle & Cooper lation has been estimated at c. 250 000 birds (Rose & Scott 1977; Martin & Baird 1987; Spearpoint et al. 1988; Velasquez 1994). et al. 1991). In southern Africa it is largely coastal, and is most abun- Large-scale overwintering has been attributed to the risk dant on estuaries on the west coast. Although it was recorded of death during migration outweighing the benefits of recon- from widely scattered inland localities, most of these records noitring the breeding grounds before being mature enough to are of birds on passage.
    [Show full text]
  • Biometrics and Moult of Grey Plover (Pluvialis Squatarola) In
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Vogelwarte - Zeitschrift für Vogelkunde Jahr/Year: 1997/98 Band/Volume: 39_1998 Autor(en)/Author(s): Serra Lorenzo, Rusticali Renzo Artikel/Article: Biometrics and moult of Grey Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) in northeastern Italy 281-292 © Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft und Partner; download www.do-g.de; www.zobodat.at Die Vogelwarte 39, 1998: 281-292 Biometrics and moult of Grey Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) in northeastern Italy By Lorenzo Serra and Renzo Rusticali Abstract: S erra , L., & R. R usticali (1998): Biometrics and moult of Grey Plover ( Pluvialis squatarola) win­ tering in northeastern Italy. Vogelwarte 39: 281-292. Grey Plovers ( Pluvialis squatarola) wintering in northeastern Italy were morphometrically closer to the popu­ lations which use the East Atlantic Fly way than those following eastern routes, but differences in biometrics ap­ peared too small for reliable considerations on breeding origins. Body mass seasonal variations showed a clear mid-winter peak, reaching 250 g both in adults and first-years. No body mass increase was observed in spring, suggesting early, short movements to pre-migratory staging areas where energy reserves are accumulated. Adult primary moult was estimated in 93 days, with mean starting day on 18 August and mean closing date on 19 No­ vember. Two concurrently active primary moult cycles were observed on second year birds in September-Oc- tober. Key words: Grey Plover ( Pluvialis squatarola), biometrics, body mass variations, primary moult, wintering, Italy. Addresses: Avian Demography Unit, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa; Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica, via Ca Fornacetta 9,1-40064 Ozzano Emilia, Italy (current address) (L.
    [Show full text]
  • MOLLUSCA EATEN 'BY BIRDS by BERNARD C
    44 THE .S:A.- ORNITHOLOGIST June, 1900 MOLLUSCA EATEN 'BY BIRDS By BERNARD C. COTTON, F.R.Z.S. Molluscs, listed here, have been found in PELECANIFORMES. stomach and crop contents of birds or are k b b Black Cormorant mown, y 0 servation, to be eaten by birds Phalacrooorax carbo ~n South Australia. Where specifically found Port River, 1934,. 27, 29, 49, 82. m the crop the record is so indicated. The shell contents are usually fragmentary. Cor- Pied Cormorant responding numbers against the specific Phalacrocorax uarius names. of molloscs .l~sted are used as a key, Port River, 1936. 27, 29, 41. following the specific names of the _birds. Australian Pelican TIle molluscs have been noted from various Pelecanus conspicillatus sources over many years. Among those Coorong-Tailem Bend, etc. 1, 2,. 5, 8, who provided material are the late Sir Joseph 10, 16. Attached to feathers, 2, 3, 4, 6. Verco, Dr. Morgan, J. Sutton, Edwin Ashby, LAR~FORMES. Prof. T. H. Johnson and A. M. Lea. Lea and Gray (6) provided an extensive. Crested Ter~ . list of general stomach contents, but not Sterna bergii specific identifications were mentioned" in"- .Encounter Bay, December, 1950. 91. connection with the shells. Silver Gull Lea also published a series of papers (1) Larus novaehollandiae (2) (4) (6), mentioning insects, seeds, ete., Semaphore. 23; 24:26, 27, '31,32; 33, from birds. 34, 36, 37, 38, "39. Silver Gull paddles Hie A few records of molluscs attached to birds' sand and picks up the small cockle 29 as it feathers, legs and feet are also noted.
    [Show full text]
  • PW Integrated Template
    M2 Junction 5 Improvements Environmental Statement Volume 2 - Appendix D.8 Wintering Bird Survey Report June 2019 Status: A1 APPROVED - PUBLISHED Document Ref: HE551521-ATK-EBD-RP-LE-000019 M2 Junction 5 Improvements Environmental Statement Volume 2 - Appendix D.8 Wintering Bird Survey Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Highways England’s information and use in relation to M2 Junction 5 Improvement. Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document control The Project Manager is responsible for production of this document, based on the contributions made by his/her team existing at each Stage Document Title Volume 2 - Appendix D.8 Wintering Bird Survey Author LS Owner Camelia Lichtl Distribution Document Status A1 Revision History Version Date Description Originator Checker Reviewer Authoriser C03 21/05/2019 Final for LS AR LS HC Publication C02 09/03/19 Draft 2 for HE LS AR LS HC Review Reviewer List Name Role Environment Support Centre SES Environment Group The original format of this document is copyright to Highways England Revision C03 Page 2 of 30 M2 Junction 5 Improvements Environmental Statement Volume 2 - Appendix D.8 Wintering Bird Survey Report Table of contents Chapter Pages Appendix D. 8 Wintering Bird Survey Report 5 D.1 Introduction 5 D.2 Methodology 5 D.3 Assessment 9 D.4 Results 10 D.5 Evaluation 16 D.6 Conclusion 16 Appendix A. Summary of Relevant legislation 19 Appendix B.
    [Show full text]