DOCSLIB.ORG

Rethinking Recycling: an Oregon Waste Reduction Curriculum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 466 402 SE 066 484 TITLE Rethinking Recycling: An Oregon Waste Reduction Curriculum. INSTITUTION Oregon State Dept. of Environmental Quality, Portland. PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 371p. AVAILABLE FROM Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality, Solid Waste Education Coordinator, 811 SW 6th Avenue, Portland, OR 97204-1390. Tel: 800-452-4011 (Toll Free); Tel: 503-229-5913; Fax: 503-229-6977; e-mail: [email protected]. For full text: http://www.deq.state.or.us. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC15 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Elementary Education; *Environmental Education; Environmental Influences; Instructional Materials; *Recycling; *Science Activities; *Science Curriculum; Science Instruction; *Waste Disposal ABSTRACT This updated curriculum guide is designed to provide teachers of elementary school science with a set of activities on recycling and waste reduction. The curriculum has three sections:(1) Grades K-3 Lessons;(2) Grades 4-5 Lessons; and (3) Teacher's Resource Guide. It is designed to take students from an introduction to natural resources and their uses to what happens to something when people are finished with it to ways to conserve, prevent, compost, and recycle. Lessons are grouped into subject areas such as Environmental Awareness, Solid Waste, Waste Prevention and Reuse, Recycling, and Composting. Teachers are able to pick and choose the lessons according to their class needs, as long as the students are given background from other lessons (prerequisite information is indicated) and appropriate vocabulary words. (MM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. S RETHI RECYC State of Oregon An Oregon Waste Department of Environmental Reduction Curriculu uality l_c1152s11n Oo PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1)s ) , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement L--- DUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 2 , document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. R 7',/N;' iA Minor changes have been made to r improve reproduction quality. °Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. COPY AVAILABLE Department of Environmermtall Quality Headquarters 811 SW Sixth Avenue John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor Portland, OR 97204-1390 (503) 229-5696 FAX (503) 229-6 124 TTY (503) 229-6993 June 2001 FOREWORD William Butler Yeats once said, "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the burning of a fire." No one understands this concept better than our teachers. With the release of the updated Rethinking Recycling: An Oregon Waste Reduction Curriculum (K-5), our goal is to provide a balanced look at solid waste issues in Oregon to allow students to investigate, interpret, analyze and set their problem solving skills "on fire." It is important for students to realize that current paradigms may not always be future solutions. The mission of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is "To be an active leader in restoring, enhancing, and maintaining Oregon's air, land, and water." By providing educational support materials to our teachers, we hope that students will be active in shaping Oregon's future and become stewards of our air, land and water. Rethinking Recycling now includes relevant Common Curriculum Goals and Benchmarks with each lesson to make it easier to integrate into existing curriculum plans. A Teacher Resource section provides additional information and other resources for environmental lessons. Rethinking Recycling was updated using a teacher as a consultant and reviewed by other teachers and public agency educators. I hope you find this information useful and relevant in your classroom discussions on environmental awareness, resource conservation, and waste reduction. Sincerely, Netz&L. Stephanie I-Iallock Director STAN BUNN State Superintendent of Public Instruction OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Public Service Building, 255 Capitol Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310-0203 Phone (503) 378-3569Fax (503) 373-7968www.ode.state.or.us May 29, 2001 Dear Educator: The Oregon Department of Education is pleased to participate in the distribution of Rethinking Recycling...an Oregon Waste Reduction Curriculum. This curriculum represents an opportunity for you to help students learn how they can make a difference in Oregon's environment.It provides excellent activities to teach problem solving and to help students examine the real-world issues they will face as citizens in the future. Rethinking Recycling can be a valuable resource in achieving the goals of Oregon's school reform program. As individual students become aware of the impact their decisions have on our environment and take personal actions to reduce waste and protect our environmental quality, they will be demonstrating many of the applications of Oregon's Common Curriuculum Goals and Content Standards. I encourage you to use these materials and to spread the word to your colleagues and community members about the importance of Rethinking Recycling. Keep up your good work as an Oregon educator for the 21st century! Sincerely, Stan Bunn PALeners\SupponkRethinking Recycling 051001.doc 4 EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: GETTING THERE TOGETHER TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements vii. Introduction ix Lesson Objectives K-3 viii 4-5 xiv Oregon Benchmarks at a Glance: K-3 xvii Oregon Benchmarks at a Glance: 4-5 xviii Spring 2003/2004-Benchmarks Science xix Social Science )o( Grades K-3 Lesson: Where Is Away? 39 E N Etaid E ES Overhead: The Oregon Waste Hierarchy 43 Lesson: Our Natural. Resources 3 Overhead: Where Trash Goes 44 Overhead: Natural Resource Tree 5 Worksheet: Landfill! 45 Worksheet: How Families Use Worksheet: Mining The Landfill 46 Natural Resources 6 Teacher's Key: Mining the Landfill 47 Lesson: Cycles in Nature 7 Lesson: Look At A Landfill 49 Overhead: Cycles 9 Overhead: Landfill In A Jug Diagram 53 Worksheet: What's A Tree Cycle? 10 Overhead: A Simple Diagram of a Landfill 54 Worksheet: What's-A Water Cycle? 11 Overhead: When Will These Things Lesson: Litter Hunt 13 Decompose? 55 Overhead: Ways Litter Injures Wildlife 15 Worksheet: Litter Hurts Our World 17 Worksheet: Litter Is Waste In WASTE PREVENTION RISE The Wrong Place 18 Lesson: Needs and Wants 57 Lesson: Native American Culture 19 Worksheet: Needs and Wants 59 Handout: Native American Poetry 23 Needs and Wants Game Instructions 61 Pacific Northwest Native American Tales 25 Needs and Wants Game Pieces 63 Oregon Tribes Map 27 Lesson: Ads Add Up 65 Lesson: So Many Cookies... BRIO WASTE So Much Packaging 67 Lesson: What Is Trash') 29 Worksheet: Cookie Packaging Chart 69 Reading Excerpts: From Stuart Little and Worksheet: Packaging Analysis 70 Charlotte's Web 31 Lesson: Lunchroom Trash 71 Lesson: A Lot Of Garbage 33 Garbage R's Game 73 Overhead: What's In Our Garbage? 35 Worksheet:. Reducing Waste Worksheet: If Bagging Trash Is Your Game 36 What Can I Do? 74 Teacher Worksheet: Garbage Audit 37 Activity: "Waste-Less" Picnic 75 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS I Lesson: Trash or Treasure? 77 Lesson. Composting In A Jar 93 Worksheet: Throw Away or. Reuse: Worksheet: Will I Compost? 95 What I Can Do, 79 Lesson: Primary Songs 97 On Top of the Landfill 99 Join Us Recycle 100 RECY, RAG CHIPPSTRIG Pick It Up Recycle. 101 Lesson: Cycles and RE-cycles 81 In Room 10 102 Worksheet: Recycle Lifecycle- Glass 83 Litter is Garbage 103 The Cycle Game 84 Banana Peel Blues 104 Lesson: Recycle Lifecycle 85 Overhead: Recycling Symbol- The Chasing Arrows 87 NAM BEMS W STE Handout: Plastics Coding System 88 Lesson: Hazardous Products Substitutes 105 Worksheet: Plastics At Home Overhead: Signal Words 107 An-Investigation 89 Overhead: Routes of Exposure 108 Worksheet: Save These From Overhead: Learning About Labels 109 The Garbage Can! 90 Worksheet: Identify the Hazards 110 Worksheet: My Family, Can Recycle 91 Worksheet: Sink to Stream 111 Extension: Making and Molding Glass Handout: Tips for a Safer Home 112 Experiment 92 Handout: Safe Substitute Recipes 113 gni 9 ti !r.u. LEO NAST Lesson: Our Natural Resources 117 Lesson: There Is No Away 141 Overhead: Bicycle Materials, Wastes, and Overhead: Where Trash Goes 145 By-Products 119 Overhead: The Oregon Waste Hierarchy146 Overhead: Glass Manufacturing 120 Worksheet: Mining The Landfill 147 Overhead: Paper Manufacturing 121 Teacher's Key: Mining The Landfill 148 Worksheet: What Kind Of Waste Am I? 122 Lesson: Making A Model Landfill 149 Lesson: Native American Culture 123 Example of a Lined Landfill Model 153 Handout: Native American Poetry 127 Overhead: Construction of a Pacific Northwest Native American Tales129 Landfill in a Bottle 154 Worksheet: Native American Tales 131 Making a Model Landfill Instruction Sheet 155 Oregon Tribes Map 132 Handout: Active Facilities In Oregon 157 Handout: Active Facilities in Metro Area Lesson: Famous Environmentalists 133 158 Map Exercise: Making a Model Landfill 159 The Growth of Society 135 Conservationists 135 Lesson: Classroom Trash Audit 161 Earth Advocates 136 Overhead: What's In Our Garbage? 163 Definitions/Terms 138 Worksheet: Garbage Audit 164 Worksheet: Famous Environmentalists 139 Worksheet: If Bagging Trash Is Your Game165 Timeline 140 Extension: Take Home Trash Audit 167 Worksheet: How Much Waste Do I Create?169 iv 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS lJ - ASTE PREVENTION EINE Lesson: Get To Know Glass 223 Lesson: Spanish Lessons On Waste
Recommended publications
  • Oregon Tourism Commission

    Oregon Tourism Commission

    Oregon Tourism Commission Staff Report | February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Optimize Statewide Economic Impact............................................................................... 2 Drive business from key global markets through integrated sales/marketing plans leveraged with global partners and domestic travel trade ..................................................... 2 Guide tourism in a way that achieves the optimal balance of visitation, economic impact, natural resources conservation and livability ......................................................................... 7 Inspire overnight leisure travel through industry-leading branding, marketing and communications ........................................................................................................................ 7 Support and Empower Oregon’s Tourism Industry ...................................................... 34 Provide development and training opportunities to meet the evolving tourism industry needs ......................................................................................................................................... 34 Implement industry leading visitor information network ................................................... 43 Fully realize statewide, strategic integration of OTIS (Oregon Tourism Information System) .................................................................................................................................... 45 Deploy tourism programs (e.g. RCTP, Competitive Grants) in a powerful way
  • Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape

    Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape

    3220 Donald B. Zobel, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331- 2902 e-mail: [email protected] Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape Abstract Data regarding probable uses of biological materials by the indigenous people of the Salmon River-Cascade Head area of the Oregon coast were used to estimate the peoples use of various ecosystems near villages. Of 308 uses identified, 256 were attributable to a given species; 124 species were identified. All local ecosystems were important sources of organisms for the people, with no apparent concentration of highly used species in any particular ecosystem. One species was cultivated, one domesticated, and five acquired by trade. Four major plant resources, camas, yew, hazel, and beargrass, are not known from the Cascade Head landscape, but may have been available from elsewhere in village territory. House construction without use of cedar planks, as indicated by ethnographic records, may have resulted from the paucity of western redcedar in the Salmon River lowlands. The scarcity of several widely used taxa near coastal village sites, especially western redcedar, may have limited the wealth of this indigenous population, even on the resource-rich Oregon coast. Introduction Tillamook, who resided near Cascade Head on the north-central Oregon Coast, in an area where Indigenous people used resources primarily from information about historic and modern plant and the landscape in which they resided. The natural animal species distribution is unusually complete. distribution of resources governed the pattern and The list of taxa used was compared to historic richness of their lives.
  • Sovereignty by Subtraction: the Multilateral Agreement on Investment Robert Stumberg*

    Sovereignty by Subtraction: the Multilateral Agreement on Investment Robert Stumberg*

    Cornell International Law Journal Volume 31 Article 5 Issue 3 Symposium 1998 Sovereignty by Subtraction: The ultM ilateral Agreement on Investment Robert Stumberg Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Stumberg, Robert (1998) "Sovereignty by Subtraction: The ultM ilateral Agreement on Investment," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 31: Iss. 3, Article 5. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol31/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sovereignty by Subtraction: The Multilateral Agreement on Investment Robert Stumberg* Introduction ..................................................... 492 I. Overview of the MAI Sovereignty Debate .................. 496 A. Trade-Offs in the MAI Negotiations .................... 496 B. Defining Sovereignty as the Balance of Power .......... 498 C. Main Features of the MAI ............................. 501 D. Sovereignty Preservation Arguments ................... 503 1. Preemption by Federal Courts ...................... 503 2. Administrative Implementation ..................... 504 3. Legislation ........................................ 504 E. Likelihood of Conflict Arguments ..................... 506 1. Trade Is Not Investment
  • Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes, Volume II: Tribal Case

    Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes, Volume II: Tribal Case

    OCS Study BOEM 2017-001 Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes Volume II: Tribal Case Studies US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region This page intentionally left blank. OCS Study BOEM 2017-001 Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes Volume II: Tribal Case Studies David Ball Rosie Clayburn Roberta Cordero Briece Edwards Valerie Grussing Janine Ledford Robert McConnell Rebekah Monette Robert Steelquist Eirik Thorsgard Jon Townsend Prepared under BOEM-NOAA Interagency Agreement M12PG00035 by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of National Marine Sanctuaries 1305 East-West Highway, SSMC4 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Makah Tribe Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon Yurok Tribe National Marine Sanctuary Foundation US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of National Marine Sanctuaries US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region December 31, 2017 This page intentionally left blank. DISCLAIMER This study was funded, in part, by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Pacific Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Region, Camarillo, CA, through Interagency Agreement Number M12PG00035 with the US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report can be downloaded from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s Recently Completed Environmental Studies – Pacific webpage at https://www.boem.gov/Pacific-Completed-Studies/.
  • 2015-17 Biennial Energy Plan

    2015-17 Biennial Energy Plan

    2015-17 2015-17 STATE OF OREGON BIENNIAL ENERGY PLAN Oregon Department of Energy 625 Marion Street N.E. Salem, Oregon 97301 Oregon.gov/energy Oregon Department of Energy 1-800-221-8035 625 Marion Street N.E. 503-378-4040 Salem, Oregon 97301 Oregon.gov/energy 1-800-221-8035 503-378-4040 State of Oregon Biennial Energy Plan 2015-17 State of O n Energy lan Oregon Department of Energy 625 Marion St. NE Salem, OR 97301 503-378-4040 or toll-free in Oregon 1-800-221-8035 www.oregon.gov/energy 2 State of Oregon Biennial Energy Plan 2015-17 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................4 ENERGY MATTERS ........................................................................................6 ENERGY SUPPLY AND DEMAND .................................................................. 11 ENERGY TRENDS AND ISSUES ..................................................................... 29 REDUCING ENERGY COSTS .......................................................................... 40 Appendix A – Energy Glossary ................................................. 47 Appendix B – Energy Legislation .............................................. 54 Appendix C – Final BETC Awards by County ............................. 68 Appendix D – Success Stories ................................................... 75 Appendix E – Government-to-Government Report .................. 77 Appendix F – Oregon’s Electric Utilities ................................... 81 3 State of Oregon Biennial Energy
  • The Spirit of the Tillamook People by Brian D

    The Spirit of the Tillamook People by Brian D

    The Spirit of the Tillamook People By Brian D. Ratty © 2016 The terrain of the Northwest Coastline is rugged and untamed, in many ways as forbidding as the natives that flourished on its shore. This narrow strip of land was home to dozens of different Indian nations. Just south of Tillamook Bay were many other nations, including the Siletz and the Siuslaw, while to the north were the Clatsop and Chinook tribes. Unlike most inland Indians, these nations didn’tnomadically follow game or move with the seasons. Instead, they stayed close to the bays and the sea, establishing permanent homes and villages. Within each Indian nation there were tribes, and within these tribes there were bands, and within these bands there were different clans. Each nation lived to the dictates of the resources Mother Nature provided, and their ability to hunt and gather food. When Captain Robert Gray discovered Tillamook Bay in 1788, the Tillamook nation numbered roughly 2,200 natives. These people lived in nine different villages, from the Nestucca River in the south to the Nehalem Bay in the north. The largest Tillamook village was Kilharhurst, which occupied the land that is the present-day site of Garibaldi, Oregon. The river next to this village was called Kilharnar, known today as the Miami River. This village had about fifty lodges and five hundred inhabitants. Over time, the Tillamooks assumed most of the customs, habits and dress of their powerful neighbors to the north, the Chinooks. Although both nations spoke the Salish language, their dialects were so different that, when they talked, they had to sign, as well.
  • A Review of Ethnographic and Historically Recorded Dentaliurn Source Locations

    A Review of Ethnographic and Historically Recorded Dentaliurn Source Locations

    FISHINGFOR IVORYWORMS: A REVIEWOF ETHNOGRAPHICAND HISTORICALLY RECORDEDDENTALIUM SOURCE LOCATIONS Andrew John Barton B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1979 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY Q Andrew John Barton 1994 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Burnaby October, 1994 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means without permission of the author. Name: Andrew John Barton Degree: Master of Arts (Archaeology) Title of Thesis: Fishing for Ivory Worms: A Review of Ethnographic and Historically Recorded Dentaliurn Source Locations Examining Committee: Chairperson: Jack D. Nance - -, David V. Burley Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Richard Inglis External Examiner Department of Aboriginal Affairs Government of British Columbia PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of ThesisIDissertation: Fishing for Ivory Worms: A Review of Ethnographic and Historically Recorded Dentalium Source Locations Author: Andrew John Barton Name October 14, 1994 Date This study reviews and examines historic and ethnographic written documents that identify locations where Dentaliurn shells were procured by west coast Native North Americans.
  • Shipwreck Traditions and Treasure Hunting on Oregon's North Coast

    Shipwreck Traditions and Treasure Hunting on Oregon's North Coast

    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology Summer 2018 The Mountain of a Thousand Holes: Shipwreck Traditions and Treasure Hunting on Oregon's North Coast Cameron La Follette Oregon Coast Alliance Dennis Griffin Oregon State Historic Preservation Office Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Cameron La Follette, Dennis Griffin, & Douglas Deur. (2018). The Mountain of a Thousand Holes: Shipwreck Traditions and Treasure Hunting on Oregon's North Coast. Oregon Historical Quarterly, 119(2), 282-313. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. The Mountain of a Thousand Holes Shipwreck Traditions and Treasure Hunting on Oregon’s North Coast CAMERON LA FOLLETTE, DENNIS GRIFFIN, AND DOUGLAS DEUR EURO-AMERICANS in coastal communities conflated and amplified Native American oral traditions of shipwrecks in Tillamook County, increasingly focusing the stories on buried treasure. This focus led to a trickle, and then a procession, of treasure-seekers visiting the northern Oregon coast, reach- ing full crescendo by the mid to late twentieth century. The seekers’ theo- ries ranged from the fairly straightforward to the wildly carnivalesque, with many bizarre permutations. Neahkahnie Mountain and its beaches became the premier treasure-hunting sites in Oregon, based on the mountain’s prominence in popular lore, linked to unverified stories about the wreck of a Spanish ship.
  • Archaeological Investigations at Site 35Ti90, Tillamook, Oregon

    Archaeological Investigations at Site 35Ti90, Tillamook, Oregon

    DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT SITE 35TI90, TILLAMOOK, OREGON By: Bill R. Roulette, M.A., RPA, Thomas E. Becker, M.A., RPA, Lucille E. Harris, M.A., and Erica D. McCormick, M.Sc. With contributions by: Krey N. Easton and Frederick C. Anderson, M.A. February 3, 2012 APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC., REPORT NO. 686 Findings: + (35TI90) County: Tillamook T/R/S: Section 25, T1S, R10W, WM Quad/Date: Tillamook, OR (1985) Project Type: Site Damage Assessment, Testing, Data Recovery, Monitoring New Prehistoric 0 Historic 0 Isolate 0 Archaeological Permit Nos.: AP-964, -1055, -1191 Curation Location: Oregon State Museum of Natural and Cultural History under Accession Number 1739 DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT SITE 35TI90, TILLAMOOK, OREGON By: Bill R. Roulette, M.A., RPA, Thomas E. Becker, M.A., RPA, Lucille E. Harris, M.A., and Erica D. McCormick, M.Sc. With contributions by: Krey N. Easton and Frederick C. Anderson, M.A. Prepared for Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Portland, OR 97201 February 3, 2012 APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC., REPORT NO. 686 Archaeological Investigations at Site 35TI90, Tillamook, Oregon ABSTRACT Between April 2007 and October 2009, Applied Archaeological Research, Inc. (AAR) conducted multiple phases of archaeological investigations at the part of site 35TI90 located in the area of potential effects related to the city of Tillamook’s upgrade and expansion of its wastewater treatment plant (TWTP) located along the Trask River at the western edge of the city. Archaeological investigations described in this report include evaluative test excavations, a site damage assessment, three rounds of data recovery, investigations related to an inadvertent discovery, and archaeological monitoring.
  • This Digital Document Is Courtesy of the Oregon State Library. Voters’ Pamphlet

    This Digital Document Is Courtesy of the Oregon State Library. Voters’ Pamphlet

    This digital document is courtesy of the Oregon State Library. Voters’ Pamphlet Oregon Primary Election May 15, 2012 Kate Brown Oregon Secretary of State This voters’ pamphlet is provided for assistance in casting your vote by mail ballot. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION STEPHEN N. TROUT KATE BROWN DIRECTOR SECRETARY OF STATE 255 CAPITOL ST NE, SUITE 501 BARRY PACK SALEM, OREGON 97310 DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE (503) 986-1518 Dear Oregon Voters, We are happy to present the 2012 Voters’ Pamphlet for the May Primary Election. On a daily basis my offi ce provides many important services including business registration, auditing and the archiving of Oregon’s history. However, the most important service we perform is distributing information to the public. Technology has provided us with the ability to share information and conduct business online. Oregon’s elections website: www.oregonvotes.org offers a variety of services including voter registration, the ability to update your registration, ballot tracking and locating the nearest offi cial ballot dropsite. If you have not registered to vote, and would like to participate in the May Primary Election, you have until April 24, 2012. I urge all eligible Oregonians to vote and exercise the most essential right of our democratic system. Oregon offers the most convenient, accessible, secure and cost effective voting systems. We were the fi rst in the nation to implement an all vote by mail system and we consistently have some of the nation’s highest voter turnout rates. Let’s continue this Oregon tradition of participation. Please remember all ballots must be received by your county elections offi ce by 8 p.m.
  • Beverage Container Regulation: Economic Implications and Suggestions for Model Legislation

    Beverage Container Regulation: Economic Implications and Suggestions for Model Legislation

    Beverage Container Regulation: Economic Implications and Suggestions For Model Legislation Charles M. Gudger* and Kenneth D. Walters* INTRODUCTION It is a paradox of modem industrial societies that while they recently have been encountering shortages of many natural resources, more and more resources are thrown away every year. These societies face shortages of energy and at the same time experience an ever- increasing glut of solid waste residuals and litter. In the United States, production of solid waste reached the rate of 3.32 pounds per person per day in 1971.1 A prime contributor to this trend has been the growing use of throw-away consumer product packaging. Packaging is the largest com- ponent of municipal solid waste in the United States, 34 percent by weight.2 Annual U.S. consumption of packaging materials increased from 35 million tons in 1958 to 59.5 million tons in 1970, and will reach a projected 73.5 million tons in 1976, equivalent to 661 pounds of packaging per person per year.3 The use of nonreturnable beverage containers is a significant com- ponent of the solid waste problem. The growing use of nonreturnable beverage containers represents a classic success story in modern market- ing in the United States. In 1958, only two percent of the soft drink packages and 42 percent of the beer containers were nonreturnable., By 1972, 59 percent of soft drink packages and 77 percent of beer contain- ers were nonreturnable.5 In 1958, 12 billion beverage containers were * Associate Professor of Management, Oregon State University. B.S. 1948, M.S.
  • Fall Clinical Meeting October 4-9, 2014

    Fall Clinical Meeting October 4-9, 2014

    Texas Club of Internists FALL CLINICAL MEEtiNG October 4-9, 2014 The Nines Hotel Portland, Oregon CME jointly sponsored by Oregon Health & Science University and the Texas Club of Internists TCI Fall Clinical Meeting President’s Welcome Message Leighton and I are excited that you will be joining us in Portland, Oregon this fall. We have spent a week there each of the last two summers, and have come to love this city. We know you will enjoy the trip to Mt. Hood on Sunday: we watched people skiing there in July! And we don’t think the club has ever offered a short hike as part of the Sunday outing. But that’s optional, and shops in Hood River await the more urban members. Of course we get to visit the Willamette Valley for wine tasting, and that will take place on Tuesday. Make special note of the options for wineries, as you may want to experience some others before or after the meeting. While some of the places we would have liked to visit wouldn’t take large groups during harvest season, you may be able to drop in on your own. We also hope you have an extra day or two to enjoy the amazing Oregon coastline. OHSU is excited about our group. The CME department tells us they never had such a willing group of speakers as for this meeting. If you get the chance, take the aerial tram up to the campus. It’s spectacular. We have an out-of-sight band for Wednesday night.