DOCSLIB.ORG

100 Years of Managing Fossils on Federal Lands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bulletin 34 New Mexico Museum of Natural History & Science A Division of the DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS America’s Antiquities: 100 Years of Managing Fossils on Federal Lands edited by Spencer G. Lucas, Justin A. Spielmann, Patricia M. Hester, Jason P. Kenworthy and Vincent L. Santucci Albuquerque, 2006 Bulletin 34 New Mexico Museum of Natural History & Science A Division of the DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS America’s Antiquities: 100 Years of Managing Fossils on Federal Lands edited by Spencer G. Lucas, Justin A. Spielmann, Patricia M. Hester, Jason P. Kenworthy and Vincent L. Santucci Printed with the support of the U.S. Government Albuquerque, 2006 STATE OF NEW MEXICO Department of Cultural Affairs Stuart Ashman, Secretary NEW MEXICO MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY AND SCIENCE Adrian P. Hunt, Ph.D., Director BOARD OF TRUSTEES Bill Richardson, Governor, State of New Mexico, ex officio Adrian P. Hunt, Ph.D., Director, ex officio Gary Friedman, President Mary B. Gavin, Emerita Peter F. Gerity, Ph.D. Jerry Langheim Laurence Lattman, Ph.D. Morton Lieberman, Ph. D. Imogene Lindsay, Emerita John Montgomery, Ph.D. Osbjorn Pearson, Ph.D. Joseph Powell, Ph.D. Alexa Tysseling Ron V. Wilmot Cover illustration: Seventh Federal Fossil Conference logo. Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in the papers of this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Reclamation, or other federal agency. EDITORIAL BOARD Spencer G. Lucas, Ph.D., Managing editor Adrian P. Hunt, Ph.D. Gary S. Morgan, M.S. Justin A. Spielmann, B.A. Roxanne Witt, Production editor Original Printing ISSN:1524-4156 Published by Authority of the State of New Mexico Available from the New Mexico Museum of Natural History, 1801 Mountain Road NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104 Telephone (505) 841-2800; Fax (505) 841-2866; www.nmnaturalhistory.org CONTENTS Preface 1 Program 2 Abstracts 1 Using a relational geodatabase to manage paleontological resources at Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument.................................M.A. Barton, B. Frakes and H.W. Meyer 7 2 Use of GIS in managing fossils on federal lands, the USDA Forest Service Fossil Yield Potential Classification (FYPC) system....................................................Barbara Beasley 8 3 Good data vs. bad data: The importance of quality data management in paleontology.................................................………………… Rachel Benton and Reko 9 Hargrave 4 The Red Gulch dinosaur tracksite: Public participation in the conservation and manage- ment of a world-class paleontological site.…..................Brent H. Breithaupt, Elizabeth H. Southwell, Thomas Adams and Neffra A Matthews 10 5 Fossiliferous nodules from New York Gateway beaches...........…...J. A. Chamberlain, Jr., 11 P.W. Stoffer and P. Messina 6 Paleontological permitting on BLM-administered lands in Utah..................Scott E. Foss 12 7 What is our mandate to manage fossil resources on federal lands?................Scott E. Foss 13 8 Developing scientifically accurate paleontology exhibits for the National Park Sevice................................................................................................Theodore J. Fremd 14 9 Management of significant paleontological localities: Intra-agency and Interagency.........................................................................................Theodore J. Fremd 15 10 Results of a three-year paleontology inventory at Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, southern Idaho.............…......................Phil Gensler and Mary C. Carpenter 17 11 Correlation of a rare plant species with fossil sites on the Grand River National Grassland.....................................................................................................Kurt Hansen 18 12 Mowry Shale ichnofossils – management of a unique fossil tracksite in an off-highway vehicle recreation park.............................................Dale A. Hanson and Melissa Connely 19 13 Cooperative agreements, tools for partnership managment of public fossil resources, one example...............................................................................................Patricia M. Hester 20 14 Paleosensitivity map for New Mexico—a tool for land use planning......Patricia M. Hester and Dave Simons 21 15 Mitgation of fossil resources during oil and gas development......................Sherrie Landon 22 16 Cleveland-Lloyd dinosaur quarry: Restabilization and interpretation; successes and pitfalls.....................................................................................................Michael Leschin 23 17 Implementing inventory-monitoring, research and interpretive plans for El Bosque Paleontologico Piedra Chamana in the northern Andes of Peru…........Herbert W. Meyer, Deborah Woodcock, Jennifer Young, William McIntosh, Nelia Dunbar, Linda Lutz-Ryan 24 and Kim Sikoryak 18 The diversity and stratigraphic distribution of pre-dinosaurian communities from the Triassic Moenkopi Formation, Capitol Reef National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Utah...……...………………….…………………Debra L. Mickelson 25 19 Subaqueous tetrapod swim tracks from the Middle Jurassic: Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area (BCNRA), Wyoming, U.S.A....Debra L. Mickelson, Michael Ryan King, 26 Patrick Getty and Katherine A. Mickelson 20 Federal, state and volunteer cooperation on vertebrate paleontology projects on federal land: Examples from Pleistocene sites in New Mexico............Gary S. Morgan, Patricia M. Hester, Bruce A. Schumacher and Lawrence Gore 27 21 Draft paleontology resource management plan for Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, southern Utah and northern Arizona……..............…Lex Newcomb and David D. Gillette 28 22 Paleontological resource damage from “poor science:” Examples from Petrified Forest National Park..........................................................William G. Parker and Karen A. Dorn 29 23 Paleontological resource inventory of California’s Jurassic trackways...Robert E. Reynolds 30 24 Paleontological resource inventory of Miocene (Barstovian) trackways at Owl Canyon Campground, Barstow, California.......................................................Robert E. Reynolds 31 25 Investigating fossil theft from National Forest System lands....................Steven F. Ruppert 32 26 Fossils, objects of antiquity, and the Antiquities Act (1906)..................Vincent L. Santucci 33 27 Theft and vandalism of in situ fossil vertebrate tracksites.....................Vincent L. Santucci 34 28 Volunteers and partnerships, effective management of fossil resources on National Forest System lands……………................................Bruce A. Schumacher and Virginia Tidwell 35 29 Historical Resources Act designation of the Grande Cache Dinosaur Tracksite (Lower Cretaceous, Albian), Grande Cache, Alberta, Canada...............Daniel N. Spivak, Dean E. Wetzel and Juliette Caillaiu 36 30 Preserving the past: Geologic mapping and paleontologic investigation, Las Vegas Formation, north Las Vegas….....…......Kathleen Springer, J. Christopher Sagebiel, Craig 38 Manker and Eric Scott 31 A new Middle Miocene terrestrial fauna from the Temblor Formation of central California..............................................J. D. Stewart, Erik Zaborsky and Marjorie Hakel 40 32 Fossil collection storage: A state-of-the-art case study…….................Mary E. Thompson 41 33 Initial results of a five-year cooperative interagency paleontological survey, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah and surrounding area: The proof is in the pooling (of resources)..............….A.L. Titus, S.S. Sampson, J.I. Kirkland, D.D Deblieux, D.D Gillette, L.B. Albright and M.A. Getty 42 34 The Friends of the Florissant Fossil Beds: Partnership support of education and research in geology and paleontology.............................................................Steven Wade Veatch 43 35 Establishing a future for fossils in the National Park Service: The development of a service- wide guidebook and paleontological database...............C.C. Visaggi, V. L. Santucci, J. P. Kenworthy, A.L. Koch and T.B. Connors 44 36 Transfer of UALP San Juan Basin vertebrate fossil collection to the NMMNH....Thomas E. Williamson, Patricia M. Hester and Sheila P. Bednarski 46 Articles 37 Fossils and fire: A study on the effects of fire on paleontological resources at Badlands National Park.............................................................Rachel Benton and James Reardon 47 38 Preserving America’s fossil heritage……..........................................…….Joseph Hatcher 55 39 Middle Proterozoic paleontology of the Belt Supergroup, Glacier National Park.....................................................................................................ReBecca K. Hunt 57 40 A preliminary inventory of fossil fish from National Park Service units.……....ReBecca K. Hunt, Vincent L. Santucci and Jason Kenworthy 63 41 A preliminary inventory of National Park Service paleontological resources in cultural resource contexts, Part 1: General overview..Jason P. Kenworthy and Vincent L. Santucci 70 42 Utah Geological Survey: A valuable partner in the management of federal fossil resources…........James I. Kirkland, Donald D. Deblieux, Martha Hayden and Grant Willis 77 43 Innovative strategies to develop interpretive media for paleontological sites at Curecanti National Recreation Area, Colorado.................…Alison L. Koch and Philip J. Zichterman 81 44 Early
Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS

    JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS

    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
  • New Materials of Chalicotherium Brevirostris (Perissodactyla, Chalicotheriidae)

    New Materials of Chalicotherium Brevirostris (Perissodactyla, Chalicotheriidae)

    Geobios 45 (2012) 369–376 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Original article New materials of Chalicotherium brevirostris (Perissodactyla, Chalicotheriidae) § from the Tunggur Formation, Inner Mongolia Yan Liu *, Zhaoqun Zhang Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrate, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 142, Xizhimenwai Street, PO Box 643, Beijing 100044, PR China A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Chalicotherium brevirostris was named by Colbert based on a skull lacking mandibles from the late Middle Received 23 March 2011 Miocene Tunggur Formation, Tunggur, Inner Mongolia, China. Here we describe new mandibular Accepted 6 October 2011 materials collected from the same area. In contrast to previous expectations, the new mandibular Available online 14 July 2012 materials show a long snout, long diastema, a three lower incisors and a canine. C. brevirostris shows some sexual dimorphism and intraspecific variation in morphologic characters. The new materials differ Keywords: from previously described C. cf. brevirostris from Cixian County (Hebei Province) and the Tsaidam Basin, Tunggur which may represent a different, new species close to C. brevirostris. The diagnosis of C. brevirostris is Middle Miocene revised. Chalicotheriinae Chalicotherium ß 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. 1. Abbreviations progress in understanding the Tunggur geology and paleontology (Qiu et al., 1988). The most important result of this expedition so far is
  • Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation Near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA

    Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation Near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA

    The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon Volume 84 Issue 1 Article 6 1-6-2012 Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA Sophia L. May College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] Larry E. Davis College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] David G. Brown College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/compass Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation May, Sophia L.; Davis, Larry E.; and Brown, David G. (2012) "Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA," The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon: Vol. 84: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/compass/vol84/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ON THE OUTCROP Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA Sophia L. May, Larry E. Davis, and David G. Brown Department of Biology College of Saint Benedict/Saint John’s University Collegeville, Minnesota, 56321 USA [email protected] LOCATION From the intersection of (Olmsted) Co. Hwy 2 and U.S. 52 Rochester I-90 (Main Street) in Chatfield, MN drive N south-southeast on U.S.
  • The Evolution of Micro-Cursoriality in Mammals

    The Evolution of Micro-Cursoriality in Mammals

    © 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | The Journal of Experimental Biology (2014) 217, 1316-1325 doi:10.1242/jeb.095737 RESEARCH ARTICLE The evolution of micro-cursoriality in mammals Barry G. Lovegrove* and Metobor O. Mowoe* ABSTRACT Perissodactyla) in response to the emergence of open landscapes and In this study we report on the evolution of micro-cursoriality, a unique grasslands following the Eocene Thermal Maximum (Janis, 1993; case of cursoriality in mammals smaller than 1 kg. We obtained new Janis and Wilhelm, 1993; Yuanqing et al., 2007; Jardine et al., 2012; running speed and limb morphology data for two species of elephant- Lovegrove, 2012b; Lovegrove and Mowoe, 2013). shrews (Elephantulus spp., Macroscelidae) from Namaqualand, Loosely defined, cursorial mammals are those that run fast. South Africa, which we compared with published data for other However, more explicit definitions of cursoriality remain obscure mammals. Elephantulus maximum running speeds were higher than because locomotor performance is influenced by multiple variables, those of most mammals smaller than 1 kg. Elephantulus also including behaviour, biomechanics, physiology and morphology possess exceptionally high metatarsal:femur ratios (1.07) that are (Taylor et al., 1970; Garland, 1983a; Garland, 1983b; Garland and typically associated with fast unguligrade cursors. Cursoriality evolved Janis, 1993; Stein and Casinos, 1997; Carrano, 1999). In an in the Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla and Carnivora coincident with evaluation of these definition problems, Carrano (Carrano, 1999) global cooling and the replacement of forests with open landscapes argued that ‘…morphology should remain the fundamental basis for in the Oligocene and Miocene. The majority of mammal species, making distinctions between locomotor performance…’.
  • OFR21 a Guide to Fossil Sharks, Skates, and Rays from The

    OFR21 a Guide to Fossil Sharks, Skates, and Rays from The

    STATE OF DELAWARE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN FILE REPORT No. 21 A GUIDE TO FOSSIL SHARKS J SKATES J AND RAYS FROM THE CHESAPEAKE ANU DELAWARE CANAL AREA) DELAWARE BY EDWARD M. LAUGINIGER AND EUGENE F. HARTSTEIN NEWARK) DELAWARE MAY 1983 Reprinted 6-95 FOREWORD The authors of this paper are serious avocational students of paleontology. We are pleased to present their work on vertebrate fossils found in Delaware, a subject that has not before been adequately investigated. Edward M. Lauginiger of Wilmington, Delaware teaches biology at Academy Park High School in Sharon Hill, Pennsyl­ vania. He is especially interested in fossils from the Cretaceous. Eugene F. Hartstein, also of Wilmington, is a chemical engineer with a particular interest in echinoderm and vertebrate fossils. Their combined efforts on this study total 13 years. They have pursued the subject in New Jersey, Maryland, and Texas as well as in Delaware. Both authors are members of the Mid-America Paleontology Society, the Delaware Valley Paleontology Society, and the Delaware Mineralogical Society. We believe that Messrs. Lauginiger and Hartstein have made a significant technical contribution that will be of interest to both professional and amateur paleontologists. Robert R. Jordan State Geologist A GUIDE TO FOSSIL SHARKS, SKATES, AND RAYS FROM THE CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL AREA, DELAWARE Edward M. Lauginiger and Eugene F. Hartstein INTRODUCTION In recent years there has been a renewed interest by both amateur and professional paleontologists in the rich upper Cretaceous exposures along the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Delaware (Fig. 1). Large quantities of fossil material, mostly clams, oysters, and snails have been collected as a result of this activity.
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached

    This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached

    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Cretaceous Research 32 (2011) 135e142 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A reassessment of large theropod dinosaur tracks from the mid-Cretaceous (late AlbianeCenomanian) Winton Formation of Lark Quarry, central-western Queensland, Australia: A case for mistaken identity Anthony Romilio a,*, Steven W. Salisbury a,b a School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia b Vertebrate Paleontology Section, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-4080, USA article info abstract Article history: Multivariate analysis is used to differentiate shape variations between ichnites of theropod and Received 9 June 2010 ornithopod dinosaurs. Tracks of an alleged theropod cf. Tyrannosauropus from the mid-Cretaceous (late Accepted in revised form 10 November 2010 AlbianeCenomanian) Winton Formation of Lark Quarry, central-western Queensland, Australia were Available online 22 November 2010 examined and foot shape ratios calculated. Multivariate analysis of these shape variables indicates this track-maker was an ornithopod dinosaur.
  • Whale Evolution Lab – Page 1

    Whale Evolution Lab – Page 1

    Whale Evolution Lab – Page 1 Whale Evolution Lab Adapted from http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb PRELAB (recommended)… FROM LAND TO WATER: A Whale Evolution Internet Activity http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/lessons/whalekiosk.html Click on “SCREEN” to “Find Out More” A. Anatomy B. Fossil record C. Molecular evidence A. WHALE ANATOMY 1. What does the Latin word “cetus” mean? 2. What three groups of organisms are considered cetaceans? 3. What are the two subgroups of cetaceans? 4. What characterizes the subgroup Odontoceti? 5. What characterizes the subgroup Mysticeti? 6. Follow the instructions given to compare anatomical parts. Click on the labels to compare the whale’s anatomy with that of a fish and a cat. Fill out the chart below with your answers to each structure, by placing an “X” under the organism whose structure is more similar to the whale’s. Structure FISH CAT Structure FISH CAT Ears Forelimb Eyes Jaw Lungs Mammary gland 7. According to the anatomical evidence, which organism is more closely related to a whale…fish or cat? 8. Draw and label the cladogram that you created for the whale, fish, and cat below. 9. What is the relationship between whales and cats? B. FOSSIL RECORD 1. What is a fossil? 2. What are the most likely parts to become fossilized? 3. What are trace fossils? List some examples. 4. What is a coprolite? 5. What fossilized anatomical structure can be useful to anatomists? 6. Compare the fossil teeth of whales to the other organisms on the website. What sort of organism has fossil teeth most similar to whale teeth? 7.
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum

    Proceedings of the United States National Museum

    PALEOCENE PRIMATES OF THE FORT UNION, WITH DIS- CUSSION OF RELATIONSHIPS OF EOCENE PRIMATES. By James Williams Gidley, Assistant Curator, United States National Museum. INTRODUCTION. The first important contribution to the knowledge of Fort Union mammalian life was furnished by Dr. Earl Douglass and was based on a small lot of fragmentary material collected by him in the au- tumn of 1901 from a locality in Sweet Grass County, Montana, about 25 miles northeast of Bigtimber.* The fauna described by Douglass indicated a horizon about equivalent in age to the Torrejon of New Mexico, but the presence of unfamilar forms, suggesting a different faunal phase, was recognized. A few years later (1908 to 1911) this region was much more fully explored for fossil remains by parties of the United States Geological Survey and the United States National Museum. Working under the direction of Dr. T. W. Stanton, Mr. Albert C. Silberling, an ener- getic and successful collector, procured the first specimens in the winter and spring of 1908, continuing operations intermittently through the following years until the early spring of 1911. The present writer visited the field in 1908 and again in 1909, securing a considerable amount of good material. The net result of this com- bined field work is the splendid collection now in the National Museum, consisting of about 1,000 specimens, for the most part upper and lower jaw portions carrying teeth in varying numbers, but including also several characteristic foot and limb bones. Although nearly 10 years have passed since the last of this collec- tion was received, it was not until late in the summer of 1920 that the preparation of the material for study was completed.
  • Appendix: Economic Geology: Exploration for Coal, Oil and Minerals

    Appendix: Economic Geology: Exploration for Coal, Oil and Minerals

    Downloaded from http://mem.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 PART 4 Appendix: Economic geology: exploration for coal, oil and Glossary of stratigraphic names, 463 minerals, 449 References, 477 Index of place names, 455 General Index, 515 Alkahornet, a distinctive landmark on the northwest, entrance to Isfjorden, is formed of early Varanger carbonates. The view is from Trygghamna ('Safe Harbour') with CSE motorboats Salterella and Collenia by the shore, with good anchorage and easy access inland. Photo M. J. Hambrey, CSE (SP. 1561). Routine journeys to the fjords of north Spitsbergen and Nordaustlandet pass by the rocky coastline of northwest Spitsbergen. Here is a view of Smeerenburgbreen from Smeerenburgfjordenwhich affords some shelter being protected by outer islands. On one of these was Smeerenburg, the principal base for early whaling, hence the Dutch name for 'blubber town'. Photo N. I. Cox, CSE 1989. Downloaded from http://mem.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 The CSE motorboat Salterella in Liefdefjorden looking north towards Erikbreen with largely Devonian rocks in the background unconformably on metamorphic Proterozoic to the left. Photo P. W. Web, CSE 1989. Access to cliffs and a glacier route (up Hannabreen) often necessitates crossing blocky talus (here Devonian in foreground) and then possibly a pleasanter route up the moraine on to hard glacier ice. Moraine generally affords a useful introduction to the rocks to be traversed along the glacial margin. The dots in the sky are geese training their young to fly in V formation for their migration back to the UK at the end of the summer.
  • Thewissen Et Al. Reply Replying To: J

    Thewissen Et Al. Reply Replying To: J

    NATURE | Vol 458 | 19 March 2009 BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS ARISING Hippopotamus and whale phylogeny Arising from: J. G. M. Thewissen, L. N. Cooper, M. T. Clementz, S. Bajpai & B. N. Tiwari Nature 450, 1190–1194 (2007) Thewissen etal.1 describe new fossils from India that apparentlysupport fossils, Raoellidae or the raoellid Indohyus is more closely related to a phylogeny that places Cetacea (that is, whales, dolphins, porpoises) as Cetacea than is Hippopotamidae (Fig. 1). Hippopotamidae is the the sister group to the extinct family Raoellidae, and Hippopotamidae exclusive sister group to Cetacea plus Raoellidae in the analysis that as more closely related to pigs and peccaries (that is, Suina) than to down-weights homoplastic characters, althoughin the equallyweighted cetaceans. However, our reanalysis of a modified version of the data set analysis, another topology was equally parsimonious. In that topology, they used2 differs in retaining molecular characters and demonstrates Hippopotamidae moved one node out, being the sister group to an that Hippopotamidae is the closest extant family to Cetacea and that Andrewsarchus, Raoellidae and Cetacea clade. In neither analysis is raoellids are the closest extinct group, consistent with previous phylo- Hippopotamidae closer to the pigs and peccaries than to Cetacea, the genetic studies2,3. This topology supports the view that the aquatic result obtained by Thewissen et al.1. In all our analyses, pachyostosis adaptations in hippopotamids and cetaceans are inherited from their (thickening) of limb bones and bottom walking, which occur in hippo- common ancestor4. potamids9,10, are interpreted to have evolved before the pachyostosis of To conduct our analyses, we started with the same published matrix the auditory bulla, as seen in raoellids and cetaceans1.
  • Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming

    Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming

    Distribution and Stratigraphip Correlation of Upper:UB_ • Ju Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming U,S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESS IONAL PAPER 1540 Cover. A member of the American Museum of Natural History 1896 expedition enter­ ing the badlands of the Willwood Formation on Dorsey Creek, Wyoming, near what is now U.S. Geological Survey fossil vertebrate locality D1691 (Wardel Reservoir quadran­ gle). View to the southwest. Photograph by Walter Granger, courtesy of the Department of Library Services, American Museum of Natural History, New York, negative no. 35957. DISTRIBUTION AND STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION OF UPPER PALEOCENE AND LOWER EOCENE FOSSIL MAMMAL AND PLANT LOCALITIES OF THE FORT UNION, WILLWOOD, AND TATMAN FORMATIONS, SOUTHERN BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING Upper part of the Will wood Formation on East Ridge, Middle Fork of Fifteenmile Creek, southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. The Kirwin intrusive complex of the Absaroka Range is in the background. View to the west. Distribution and Stratigraphic Correlation of Upper Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Tatman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming By Thomas M. Down, Kenneth D. Rose, Elwyn L. Simons, and Scott L. Wing U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1540 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
  • LATE MIOCENE FISHES of the CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH and IDAHO By

    LATE MIOCENE FISHES of the CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH and IDAHO By

    LATE MIOCENE FISHES OF THE CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH AND IDAHO by PATRICK H. MCCLELLAN AND GERALD R. SMITH MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 208 Ann Arbor, December 17, 2020 ISSN 0076-8405 P U B L I C A T I O N S O F T H E MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 208 GERALD SMITH, Editor The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series—the Miscellaneous Publications and the Occasional Papers. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. Occasionally the Museum publishes contributions outside of these series. Beginning in 1990 these are titled Special Publications and Circulars and each is sequentially numbered. All submitted manuscripts to any of the Museum’s publications receive external peer review. The Occasional Papers, begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are published separately. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fishes, I nsects, Mollusks, and other topics is available.