DOCSLIB.ORG

Fuel Economy and Annual Travel for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks: National On-Road Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fuel Economy and Annual Travel for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks: National On-Road Survey US. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT HS 806 971 May 1986 NHTSA Technical Report Fuel Economy and Annual Travel for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks: National On-Road Survey This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No, 3. Recipient's Catalog No, DOT HS 806 971 4. Title and Subtitle 5, Report Date Fuel Economy and Annual Travel for Passenger Cars and May 1986 Light Trucks: National On-Road Survey 6. Performing Organization Code WPP-1 0 8. Performing Orgoniiotion Report No. 7. Author's) Glenn G. Parsons 9. Performing Organization Nome and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Office of Standards Evaluation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 11. Controct or Grant No. 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20590 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 400 Seventh Street, S.W. 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 IS. Supplementary Notes An agency staff review of existing Federal regulations performed'in compliance with Executive Order 12291 and the agency's regulatory review plan (Regulatory Reform - The Review Process, DOT HS-806-159, March 1982). 16. Abstroet One of the principal actions taken by the United States in response tcr~tfte~ worldwide energy crisis of the 1970's was to Federally mandate minimum fuel economy standards for new motor vehicles. These standards began with the 1978 Model Year and continue in force today. This study is an assessment of the reduced energy (fuel) consumption for Model Year 1978-1981 vehicles, based on a national, on-road survey. In addition to the Federal standards, rapid rises in fuel costs in that period provided a second incentive for the production of more fuel efficient vehicles. The study found that: o From 1977 to 1981, on-road fuel economy of cars increased by 41 percent; for light trucks, from 1978 to 1981, the increase was 17-26 percent. o Fuel efficiency improvements in the 1978-1981 vehicles will reduce fuel consumption by 45.6 billion gallons—a dollar equivalent reduction of $53.8 billion. o On-road fuel economy is consistently below laboratory (EPA) ratings, ranging from 15-20 percent depending on vehicle type. o Average annual travel per vehicle is about 6,000 miles; both per vehicle and total fleet travel, based on odometer data, are markedly less than estimated by prior surveys. 17. Key Words 18, Distribution Statement Motor vehicle fuel economy, Federal fuel Document is available to the public economy standards, CAFE, on-road versus through the National Technical Information laboratory mpg, statistical survey, Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 odometer readings, vehicle miles traveled 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21* No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 250 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments. xi Executive Summary xiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2 ANALYSIS OF SURVEY RESULTS OF FUEL ECONOMY AND ESTIMATION OF REDUCED ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND EQUIVALENT DOLLAR VALUE....10 2.1 Passenger Cars: On Road Fuel Economy 11 2.1.1 Reliability of On-Road Fuel Economy Estimates.... 15 2.1.2 On-Road Fuel Economy Versus CAFE ...18 2.1.3 On-Road Fuel Economy Compared to the Federal Standards 20 2.1.4 On-Road Fuel Economy by Size Class 21 2.1.5 On-Road Fuel Economy by Manufacturer 21 2.2 Light Trucks - Two-Wheel Drive: On-Road Fuel Economy 30 2.2.1 On-Road Fuel Economy Compared to EPA CAFE 34 2.2.2 On-Road Fuel Economy Compared to Federal Standard 36 2.3 Light Trucks - Four-Wheel Drive: On-Road Fuel Economy 37 2.4 Light Truck On-Road Fuel Economy by Size Class .39 2.5 Diesel izat ion 42 2.5.1 Effect of Dieselization on Fuel Economy 42 2.5.2 Diesel On-Road Fuel Economy Versus EPA Laboratory Estimates 45 2.6 Seasonal Effect on Fuel Economy 48 2.7 Comparison of ORFES Results with Prior Studies of on-Road Fuel Economy 52 2.7.1 Department of Energy Studies .52 2.7.2 Environmental Protection Agency Study 54 2.7.3 General Motors Study 55 2.7.4 Ford Motor Company Studies 57 2.7.5 Summary of ORFES Comparison with Other On-Road Fuel Economy Studies 59 iii 2.8 Estimated Reduction in Fuel Consumption and Equivalent Dollar Value 59 2.8.1 Reduced Fuel Consumption for Passenger Cars 60 2.8.2 Reduced Fuel Consumption for Light Trucks 69 2.8.3 Reduced Fuel Consumption, Light Vehicle Fleet....73 2.8.4 Discussion of Reduced Fuel Consumption and Dollar Equivalent Estimates ....75 CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF SURVEY RESULTS OF VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED 78 3.1 Methodology for Estimating Vehicle Miles Traveled 79 3.2 Vehicle Miles Traveled Estimates 83 3.2.1 Overall Estimates by Model Year and Vehicle Type 83 3.2.2 Estimates by Size Class 90 3.2.3 Estimates by Type of Fuel 94 3.2.4 Annual VMT Estimates 97 3.2.5 Comparison of ORFES VMT Estimates with Other Survey Estimates 108 CHAPTER 4 SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND DATA COLLECTION 115 4.1 Survey Design 116 4.1.1 Target Population and Sampling Frame 116 4.1.2 Sample Selection, Stratification, and Division into Replicates 119 4.2 Questionnaire Design and Data Collection Methodology... 123 4.3 Data Collection, Processing, and Statistical Estimation ....128 4.3.1 Receipt Control 128 4.3.2 Data Processing 130 4.3.3 Statistical Estimation 133 4.4 Survey Response and Nonresponse Issues 136 4.5 Potential Sources of Error in ORFES Statistics 140 4.5.1 Sampling Error 140 4.5.2 Nonsampling Error 141 iv CHAPTER 5 PRINCIPAL SURVEY FINDINGS AND RESULTS 148 5.1 On-Road Fuel Economy Results - Passenger Cars 148 5.2 On-Road Fuel Economy Results - Light Trucks 149 5.3 On-Road Fuel Economy Compared to CAFE 151 5.4 On-Road Fuel Economy Compared to Federal Standards..... 152 5.5 Estimated Reduction in Energy Consumption and Equivalent Dollar Value of More Fuel-Efficient Vehicles 153 5.6 Estimates of Vehicle Miles Traveled 153 REFERENCES 157 APPENDIX A Listing of Vehicle Make Models Sampled in ORFES 160 APPENDIX B Estimation of Average Vehicle Age .< 202 APPENDIX C Survey Support Materials 205 (Prenotification Letter - NHTSA) 206 (Prenotification Letter - Survey Contractor) 207 (Questionnaire Transmittal Letter - First Wave). 208 (Incentive Log Booklet) 209 (Decals) 210 (Reminder Postcards) 211 (Questionnaire Transmittal Letter - Second Wave) 212 (Telephone Questionnaire) 213 (Questionnaire Transmittal Letter - Telephone Followup)... .217 APPENDIX D Methodology and Data for Estimating Reduced Energy Consumption and Equivalent Dollar Value 228 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 "Fuel Economy Standards for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks for the 1978 through 1987 Model Years (in MPG) 3 Table 2-1 Passenger Car On-Road Fuel Economy and Comparison to CAFE, Domestic and Import Fleets 12 Table 2-2 Standard Error and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals for Passenger Car On-Road MPG .' 17 Table 2-3 Passenger Cars: Comparison of On-R-oad Fuel Economy with CAFE and with Fuel Economy Standards 19 Table 2-4 Passenger Car On-Road Fuel Economy, Size Class by Model Year 22 Table 2-5 Passenger Car On-Road Fuel Economy by Manufacturer (Domestic) and Model Year.. 23 Table 2-6 Import Passenger Car Fleet - On-Road MPG by Manufacturer and Model Year 24 Table 2-7 Domestic Passenger Car Fleet - Comparison of On-Road MPG with CAFE, by Manufacturer 26 Table 2-8 Domestic Passenger Car Fleet - Comparison of On-Road MPG with Federal Standard, by Manufacturer..... 27 Table 2-9 Import Passenger Car Fleet - Comparison of On-Road MPG with CAFE, by Manufacturer 29 Table 2-10 Import Passenger Car Fleet -. Comparison of On-Road MPG with Federal Standard Levels 31 Table 2-11 Light Truck On-Road Fuel Economy and Comparisons to Cafe, Domestic and Import Fleets 32 Table 2-12 Light Truck: Two-Wheel Drive - Comparison of On-Road Fuel Economy with CAFE and with Fuel Economy Standards 35 Table 2-13 Light Truck: Four-Wheel Drive - Comparison of On-Road Fuel Economy with CAFE and with Federal Standards 38 Table 2-14 Light Truck On-Road Fuel Economy - Size Class by Model Year 41 Table 2-15 Comparison of Fuel Economy (MPG) between Diesel and Gasoline Powered Vehicles 43 Table 2-16 Diesel On-Road Fuel Economy Versus EPA Laboratory Estimates: 1981 Passenger Cars 47 vi Table 2-17 On-Road Fuel Economy by Season of Year (Passenger Cars Plus Light Trucks) 50 Table 2-18 Calendar Year Sales of Light Trucks, Model Years 1979-1981...69 Table 2-19(a) Total Reduction in Fuel Consumption and Dollar Equivalent Value - Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, 74 Table 2-19(b) Per Vehicle Reduction in Fuel Consumption and Dollar Equivalent Value - Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 74 Table 3-1 Total Average Vehicle Miles Traveled, as of July 1, 1983, by Type of Vehicle and Model Year 83 Table 3-2 Standard Deviation and Standard Errors for VMT Estimates 85 Table 3-3 Ninety-five Percent Confidence Limits and Tolerance Limits on VMT by Vehicle Model Year 88 Table 3-4 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled, Passenger Cars by Size Class....91 Table 3-5 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled, Light Trucks by Size Class 92 Table 3-6 Average VMT Rank by Size Class, Passenger Cars 93 Table 3-7 Vehicle Miles Traveled - Passenger Cars, Gasoline Versus Diesel 95 Table 3-8 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled, Gasoline Versus Diesel, Light Trucks 96 Table 3-9 Comparison of Observed and Predicted VMT 102 Table 3-10 Cumulative and Annual VMT Estimates Based on Fitted Logarithmic Curve 105 Table 3-11 Data for Computation of Average Annual VMT, Entire U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth Brakes
    CHRYSLER, DODGE, PLYMOUTH BRAKES After Ford started build- mouth, the medium ing horseless carriages, priced DeSoto, and the many other people saw high priced Chrysler. their potential and they Soon after that, Chrysler started building similar purchased the Dodge vehicles. Engineers and Brothers Automobile and stylists formed many of Truck Company, and the the early companies so Dodge also became a they were building nice medium priced car just cars, but the companies below DeSoto. All of the didn’t have a coherent 1935 Chrysler Airflow Chrysler truck offerings business plan. Some of the early companies were marketed under the Dodge name and that has- merged together for strength and that didn’t nec- n’t changed. General Motors used the hierarchy essarily help their bottom line. One of the early principal and it was working well for the Company, companies that started having financial problems so Chrysler borrowed the idea. was the Maxwell-Chalmers Company. Walter P. Chrysler was asked to reorganize the company Chrysler ran into a situation in the early ‘30s when and make it competitive. Chrysler did that with the their advanced engineering and styling created an Willys brand and the company became competi- unexpected problem for the Company. Automotive tive and lasted as a car company until the ‘50s. stylists in the late-’20s were using aerodynamics to The company is still around today as a Jeep man- make the early cars less wind resistant and more ufacturer that is currently owned by Chrysler. On fuel-efficient. Chrysler started designing a new car June 6, 1925, the Maxwell-Chalmers Company with that idea in mind that was very smooth for the was reorganized into the Chrysler Company and time period and in 1934 they marketed the car as the former name was dropped and the new car the Chrysler Airflow.
    [Show full text]
  • North America Sales History and Forecast
    North America sales history and forecast 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 U.S. car 131,559 153,658 162,703 172,505 166,848 170,794 172,594 195,026 211,172 Canada car 7,701 8,922 9,182 9,900 10,903 10,895 10,872 13,956 13,423 Mexico car 1,944 2,442 3,995 5,219 4,573 4,990 6,468 7,680 8,189 North America car 141,204 165,022 175,880 187,624 182,324 186,679 189,934 216,662 232,784 U.S. truck – 1,312 26,720 40,622 34,021 37,789 68,611 66,613 67,151 Canada. truck – 89 1,840 2,802 3,072 2,857 5,102 5,142 4,909 Mexico truck 115 233 213 897 982 989 928 890 983 North America truck 115 1,634 28,773 44,321 38,075 41,635 74,641 72,645 73,043 BMW 141,319 166,656 204,653 231,945 220,399 228,314 264,575 289,307 305,827 U.S. car 739,217 – – – – – – – – Canada car 86,148 – – – – – – – – Mexico car 47,176 – – – – – – – – North America car 872,541 – – – – – – – – U.S. truck 1,770,794 – – – – – – – – Canada truck 183,048 – – – – – – – – Mexico truck 45,123 – – – – – – – – North America truck 1,998,965 – – – – – – – – CHRYSLER CORP. 2,871,506 – – – – – – – – U.S. car – 889,506 894,219 863,043 739,430 744,526 751,850 775,084 796,545 Canada car – 92,064 89,163 76,691 83,291 80,243 79,625 84,883 88,430 Mexico car 52,058 65,957 86,948 78,504 86,942 87,746 91,957 97,751 North America car – 1,033,628 1,049,339 1,026,682 901,225 911,711 919,221 951,924 982,726 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
    U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT HS 808 570 January 1997 NHTSA Technical Report Relationships between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Go ,i on No. 3, Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 808 570 4. Title ond Subtitle 5. Report Dote January 1997 Relationships Between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk 6. Performing Organization Code in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 8. Performing Organization Report No 7. Author's) Charles J. Kahane, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name ond Address 10. Wort Unit No. (TRAIS) Evaluation Division, Plans and Policy National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 11. Conrroct or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20590 13. Type of Report and Period Cohered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary. Notes NHTSA Reports DOT HS 808 569 through DOT HS 808 575 address vehicle size and safety. 16. Abstract Fatality rates per million exposure years are computed by make, model and model year, based on the crash experience of model year 1985-93 passenger cars and light trucks (pickups, vans and sport utility vehicles) in the United States during calendar years 1989-93.
    [Show full text]
  • 201502-Chrysler-Book-Stock.Pdf
    C D E 1 Current as of February 24 2015 ***See Last page for Notes 2 Part Number Description Supplier 3 1940FAAD 1940 FARGO COE TRUCK AD MACLEANS APR 1941 CHRYSLER 4 WM3814 1942 CHR/PLY/DOD/DESOTO PARTS BOOK CDN CHRYSLER 5 WM4281 1951-52 CHRYS/DOD/DESOTO/PLY PARTS BOOK CHRYSLER 6 C522 1952 CHRYSLER SALES BROCHURE CDN CHRYSLER 7 DS532 1953 DE SOTO FIREDOME 8 S/BRO CDN 12 PG CHRYSLER 8 PA1969 1956 PLYMOUTH S/BRO FOLD OUT 9 X 34" US CHRYSLER 9 1956SIPT 1956-62 SIMCA ARONDE PARTS CDN 284 PG c1962 CHRYSLER 10 WM4357 1957 CHR/PLY/DOD/DESOTO SERVICE MANUAL SUPPLEMENT TO 55-56 MANUAL CHRYSLER 11 WM4393 1958 CHR/PLY/DOD/DESOTO SERVICE MANUAL SUPPLEMENT TO 55-56 S/M WM-4335 CHRYSLER 12 WM4387 1958 DODGE OWNER'S MANUAL CDN CHRYSLER 13 P582 1958 PLYMOUTH S/BRO FOLD OUT 25 X 38" CDN CHRYSLER 14 PD16 1959 CHR/PLY/DOD/DESOTO MOULDINGS CATALOG CDN CHRYSLER 15 WM4414 1959 CHR/PLY/DOD/DESOTO SERVICE MANUAL SUPPLEMENT TO 55-56 S/M WM-4335 CHRYSLER 16 WM4480 1959 CHR/PLY/DOD/DESOTO/IMP PARTS BOOK M SERIES CHRYSLER 17 D17247 1959 SIMCA ARONDE S/M 136 PG c1959 CHRYSLER 18 818703016 1959-63 SIMCA ARONDE S/M 154 PG c1963 CHRYSLER 19 WM4462 1960 CHR/PLY/DOD/DESOTO SERVICE MANUAL SUPPLEMENT TO 57-59 S/M WM-4430-31-32 CHRYSLER 20 57NY400 1960 CHRYSLER RADIO O/M AND PARTS LIST USA CHRYSLER 21 813700030 1960 DODGE TRUCK P SERIES S/M US CHRYSLER 22 WM4463 1960 DODGE, FARGO TRUCK S/M CDN SUPPLEMENT TO 57-59 S/M WM-4435-36-37 CHRYSLER 23 VA601 1960 'THE STORY OF VALIANT' S/B CDN CHRYSLER 24 CH601 1960 WINDSOR, SARATOGA, NEW YORKER S/B CDN CHRYSLER 25 WM4589 1960-63 VALIANT,
    [Show full text]
  • Winning the Oil Endgame: Innovation for Profits, Jobs, and Security Oil Dependence
    “We’ve embarked on the beginning of the Last Days of the Age of Oil. Nations of the world that are striving to modernize will make choices different from the ones we have made. They will have to. And even today’s industrial powers will shift energy use patterns....[T]he market share for carbon-rich fuels will diminish, as the demand for other forms of energy grows. And energy companies have a choice: to embrace the future and recognize the growing demand for a wide array of fuels; or ignore reality, and slowly—but surely—be left behind.” —Mike Bowlin, Chairman and CEO, ARCO, and Chairman, American Petroleum Institute, 9 Feb. 1999 1 “My personal opinion is that we are at the peak of the oil age and at the same time the begin- ning of the hydrogen age. Anything else is an interim solution in my view. The transition will be very messy, and will take many and diverse competing technological paths, but the long- term future will be in hydrogen and fuel cells.” —Herman Kuipers, Business Team Manager, Innovation & Research, Shell Global Solutions, 1. Bowlin 1999. 21 Nov. 2000 2 2. Kuipers 2000. “The days of the traditional oil company are numbered, in part because of emerging technolo- gies such as fuel cells....” 3. Bijur, undated. — Peter I. Bijur, Chairman and CEO, Texaco, Inc., late 1990s 3 4. Ingriselli 2001. “Market forces, greenery, and innovation are shaping the future of our industry and propelling 5. Gibson-Smith 1998. us inexorably towards hydrogen energy. Those who don’t pursue it…will rue it.” — Frank Ingriselli, President, Texaco Technology 6.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ~I:H;a~"1iflef1" L~S:'!l'li- ~~ .Jiil-n;H ;fi~tlt;.~tf~ ,j--: ."L,':;.:ILC :,,' 1 V.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice Every year the Miahigan State Police eMSP) test Hence. the minimlllll reqUirements this year are , ,:; ~ore than a dozen vehicles as part of their pro­ percent greater tnan last year's :Jwest scor~. curement policy. This year the testing was held Second, in the top speed test, the distance on September 13 to 18. Representatives from more vehicles were allowed ';0 travel to r-ea::h 11r] mph than 50 departments and agencies in the U.S. and Has +-ightened from 3 to 2 m.lles. Canada attenJed. This TAP Alert contains the pre­ liminary results of the test. The full report is Table 2 lists the 1987 test vehicles. Tha vehi­ expected in early November. ~les are listed in alphabetical order without regard to their performa~ce on the tes:s. The~? 7he vehicles are subjected to several different had planned to evaluate the Ford T::urus, but i': types of tests and evaluations. The results are was unavailable for testing. It wE:' "robably be weighted to reflect the relative importance of part of the 1988 tests. The :hevy :e'ebrlty, each attribute as related to MSP operational which has been tested in tne past, is no longer reqUirements. Table ~ lists the test and paint offered ~n a police package. s,:ores. Table 2. Vehicles Tested Table 1 Tests and Scoring Car Engine U Test :'~hevr01 et Capri()e s.n.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Automobile Fuel Efficiency and Synthetic Fuels: Alternatives for Reducing Oil Imports
    Increased Automobile Fuel Efficiency and Synthetic Fuels: Alternatives for Reducing Oil Imports September 1982 NTIS order #PB83-126094 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 82-600603 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword This report presents the findings of an assessment requested by the Senate Com- mittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. The study assesses and compares increased automobile fuel efficiency and synthetic fuels production with respect to their potential to reduce conventional oil consumption, and their costs and impacts. Con- servation and fuel switching as a means of reducing stationary oil uses are also con- sidered, but in considerably less detail, in order to enable estimates of plausible future oil imports. We are grateful for the assistance of the project advisory panels and the many other people who provided advice, information, and reviews. It should be understood, how- ever, that OTA assumes full responsibility for this report, which does not necessarily represent the views of individual members of the advisory panels. Director Automobile Fuel Efficiency Advisory Panel Michael J. Rabins, Chairman Wayne State University Maudine R. Cooper* John B. Heywood National Urban League, Inc. Massachusetts Institute of Technology John Ferron John Holden National Automobile Dealers Association Ford Motor Co. Donald Friedman Maryann N. Keller Minicar, Inc. Paine, Webber, Mitchell, & Hutchins Herbert Fuhrman Paul Larsen National Institute for GMC Truck and Coach Division Automobile Service Excellence Robert D. Nell James M. Gill Consumers Union The Ethyl Corp. Kenneth Orski R. Eugene Goodson** German Marshall Fund of the United States Hoover Universal, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications Chrysler E Class Base L4 2.6L Chrysler Lebaron Base L4
    TECHNICAL SUPPORT 888-910-8888 DG27 SHROUD MATERIAL POST QUANTITY Aluminum 4 ROTATION ADVANCE TYPE Clockwise Vacuum/Mechanical TRIGGER TYPE Pick Up Coil Applications Chrysler E Class Base L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 1984 GAS CARB N G - 1983 GAS CARB N G - Chrysler LeBaron Base L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 1985 GAS CARB N G - 1984 GAS CARB N G - 1983 GAS CARB N G - Chrysler LeBaron Mark Cross L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 1985 GAS CARB N G - 1984 GAS CARB N G - 1983 GAS CARB N G - Chrysler New Yorker Base L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 1985 GAS CARB N G - 1984 GAS CARB N G - 1983 GAS CARB N G - Chrysler Town & Country Base L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 1985 GAS CARB N G - 1984 GAS CARB N G - Chrysler Town & Country Mark Cross L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 1985 GAS CARB N G - 1984 GAS CARB N G - 1983 GAS CARB N G - Dodge 400 Base L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 1983 GAS CARB N G - Dodge 600 Base L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 1985 GAS CARB N G - 1984 GAS CARB N G - 1983 GAS CARB N G - Dodge 600 ES L4 2.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP.
    [Show full text]
  • Make Model Year Product Application Notes Buick Apollo 1973 12:1 Quick
    Make Model Year Product Application Notes Buick Apollo 1973 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Apollo 1974 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Apollo 1975 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Centurion 1971 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Centurion 1972 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Centurion 1973 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Century 1973 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Century 1974 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Century 1975 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Century 1976 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Century 1977 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Buick Century 1978 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Buick Century 1979 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Buick Century 1980 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Buick Century 1981 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Buick Commercial Chassis 1991 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Buick Commercial Chassis 1992 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Buick Electra 1964 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Electra 1965 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Electra 1966 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Electra 1967 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Electra 1968 12:1 Quick Ratio Steering Box Requires Rag Joint #990012 Buick Electra
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Chrysler Nationals Event Guide
    OFFICIAL EVENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 WELCOME 7 SPECIAL GUESTS 8 EVENT HIGHLIGHTS 2021-22 EVENT SCHEDULE JAN. 15-17, 2021 11 SHOWFIELD HIGHLIGHTS AUTO MANIA ALLENTOWN PA FAIRGROUNDS JAN. 14-16, 2022 14 TRIBUTE TO MR. NORM WINTER CARLISLE NEW EVENT! AUTO EXPO CARLISLE EXPO CENTER JAN. 28-29, 2022 FEATURED VEHICLE 18 DISPLAYS WINTER AUTOFEST CANCELLED FOR 2021 LAKELAND FEATURED VEHICLE SUN ’n FUN, LAKELAND, FL FEB. 25-27, 2022 DISPLAY: MOPAR 22 LAKELAND WINTER FEB. 19-20, 2021 SURVIVORS COLLECTOR CAR AUCTION SUN ’n FUN, LAKELAND, FL FEB. 25-26, 2022 25 EVENT SCHEDULE SPRING CARLISLE APRIL 21-25, 2021* PRESENTED BY EBAY MOTORS APRIL 20-24, 2022 26 EVENT MAP CARLISLE PA FAIRGROUNDS SPRING CARLISLE APRIL 22-23, 2021 COLLECTOR CAR AUCTION 28 VENDORS: BY SPECIALTY CARLISLE EXPO CENTER APRIL 21-22, 2022 IMPORT & PERFORMANCE NATS. MAY 14-15, 2021 VENDORS: A-Z 34 CARLISLE PA FAIRGROUNDS MAY 13-14, 2022 FORD NATIONALS JUNE 4-6, 2021* 40 ABOUT OUR PARTNERS PRESENTED BY MEGUIAR’S CARLISLE PA FAIRGROUNDS JUNE 3-5, 2022 HELPFUL INFORMATION & JUNE 25-26, 2021 43 POLICIES GM NATIONALS CARLISLE PA FAIRGROUNDS JUNE 24-25, 2022 44 CONCESSIONS CHRYSLER NATIONALS JULY 9-11, 2021* CARLISLE PA FAIRGROUNDS JULY 15-17, 2022 47 CARLISLE EVENTS APP TRUCK NATIONALS AUG. 6-8, 2021* PRESENTED BY A&A AUTO STORES 49 AD INDEX CARLISLE PA FAIRGROUNDS AUG. 5-7, 2022 CORVETTES AT CARLISLE AUG. 26-28, 2021 PRESENTED BY TOP FLIGHT AUTOMOTIVE 49 OUR TEAM CARLISLE PA FAIRGROUNDS AUG. 25-27, 2022 FALL CARLISLE SEPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter P. Chrysler Museum to Host First-Ever Collection of Chrysler Classic, Custom and Concept Vehicles
    Contact: Jeanne Schoenjahn Walter P. Chrysler Museum to Host First-Ever Collection of Chrysler Classic, Custom and Concept Vehicles April 6, 2004, Auburn Hills, Mich. - Inspired Chrysler Design: The Art of Driving runs May 27 – Sept. 19, 2004 Extraordinary Chrysler automobiles spanning eight decades Retrospective heralds introduction of 2005 Chrysler 300 The Walter P. Chrysler Museum will present Inspired Chrysler Design: The Art of Driving,an all-Chrysler special exhibition featuring extraordinary cars spanning eight decades, Thursday, May 27 - Sunday, Sept. 19, 2004. The exhibition will showcase vehicles recognized for design and engineering excellence from distinguished private collections, the Museum Collection and the Chrysler Design Group. Among the more than 25 cars - including several one-of-a-kind models - assembled for Inspired Chrysler Design: The Art of Driving will be: 1924 Chrysler B-70 Phaeton 1928 Chrysler Model 72 LeMans Race Car (replica) 1932 Chrysler Imperial Speedster, custom-built for Walter P. Chrysler, Jr. 1932 Chrysler Imperial CL Limousine, custom-built for Walter P. Chrysler 1937 Chrysler Airflow Limousine, custom-built for Major Bowes, producer of one of the decade's most popular radio entertainment shows 1941 and 1993 Chrysler Thunderbolt concepts 1941 Chrysler Newport Phaeton concept 1995 Chrysler Atlantic Coupe concept Vehicles will be exhibited in retrospective displays featuring original advertisements and fashion, design and color elements representing each automobile's era. Original Design Office artwork and contemporary photographs of vintage Chrysler cars will round out the exhibition. "This is the first-ever all-Chrysler exhibition and it's clearly overdue," said Walter P. Chrysler Museum Manager Barry Dressel.
    [Show full text]
  • Automobile Engineering ) Model Answer
    MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION (Autonomous) (ISO/IEC - 27001 - 2005 Certified) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ WINTER – 15 EXAMINATION Subject Code: 17526 (Automobile Engineering ) Model Answer Important Instructions to examiners: 1) The answers should be examined by key words and not as word-to-word as given in the model answer scheme. 2) The model answer and the answer written by candidate may vary but the examiner may try to assess the understanding level of the candidate. 3) The language errors such as grammatical, spelling errors should not be given more Importance (Not applicable for subject English and Communication Skills). 4) While assessing figures, examiner may give credit for principal components indicated in the figure. The figures drawn by candidate and model answer may vary. The examiner may give credit for any equivalent figure drawn. 5) Credits may be given step wise for numerical problems. In some cases, the assumed constant values may vary and there may be some difference in the candidate’s answers and model answer. 6) In case of some questions credit may be given by judgement on part of examiner of relevant answer based on candidate’s understanding. 7) For programming language papers, credit may be given to any other program based on equivalent concept. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q1.A ( a) Functions of transmission system of an automobile like, (1M per point) i. To transmit power from the engine to the rear wheels of the VEHICLE, ii. To make reduced speed available, to rear wheels of the VEHICLE, iii. To alter the ratio of wheel speed and engine speed/torque in order to suit the field conditions and iv.
    [Show full text]