DOCSLIB.ORG

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Campus Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Campus Master Plan Sacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Campus Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report • April 2018 As Amended Through Final EIR (July 2018) State Clearinghouse #2017092050 Sacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Campus Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report (Amended through Final EIR) State Clearinghouse #2017092050 April 2018 Lead Agency: Sacramento Municipal Utility District 6201 S Street, MS B203 Sacramento, CA 95817-1899 or P.O. Box 15830 MS B203 Sacramento, CA 95852-1830 Attn: Rob Ferrera (916) 732-6676 or [email protected] Prepared by: Ascent Environmental 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Chris Mundhenk [email protected] Headquarters Campus Master Plan EIR April 2018 Table of Contents Chapter/Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. ES-1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... ES-1 Summary Description of the Project ............................................................... ES-1 Environmental Impacts and Recommended Mitigation Measures .................. ES-5 Summary of Alternatives ................................................................................ ES-5 Areas of Controversy ...................................................................................... ES-7 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Intended Uses of this EIR .................................................. 1-1 1.2 Scope of the Draft EIR ............................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Agency Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................... 1-5 1.4 CEQA Public Review Process ................................................................ 1-5 1.5 Organization of the Draft EIR .................................................................. 1-8 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Project Location ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Project Setting ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.4 Project History ........................................................................................ 2-6 2.5 Project Objectives ................................................................................... 2-6 2.6 Required Public Approvals ...................................................................... 2-7 2.7 Project Description .................................................................................. 2-8 3 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION ........... 3-1 3.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources ........................................................ 3.1-1 3.2 Air Quality ............................................................................................ 3.2-1 3.3 Archaeological, Historical, and Tribal Cultural Resources ................... 3.3-1 3.4 Biological Resources ........................................................................... 3.4-1 3.5 Geology and Soils ................................................................................ 3.5-1 3.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Climate Change, and Energy ................ 3.6-1 3.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ....................................................... 3.7-1 3.8 Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................... 3.8-1 3.9 Noise .................................................................................................... 3.9-1 3.10 Transportation and Circulation ........................................................... 3.10-1 3.11 Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................. 3.11-1 4 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 CEQA Requirements .............................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Cumulative Impact Approach .................................................................. 4-1 4.3 Scope of the Cumulative Analysis .......................................................... 4-2 4.4 Cumulative Impact Analysis .................................................................... 4-5 Page i Headquarters Campus Master Plan EIR April 2018 5 OTHER CEQA SECTIONS ..................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts ...................................................... 5-1 5.2 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes ..................................... 5-1 5.3 Growth-Inducing Impacts ........................................................................ 5-3 6 ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 Considerations for Selection of Alternatives ........................................... 6-2 6.3 Alternatives Considered in Detail ............................................................ 6-5 6.4 Comparison of Alternatives ................................................................... 6-20 6.5 Environmentally Superior Alternative .................................................... 6-21 7 LIST OF PREPARERS ............................................................................................ 7-1 8 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 8-1 Appendices (included on CD on back cover) A Notice of Preparation and Comments Received B Initial Study C Air Quality/GHG Modeling Results D Noise Modeling E Traffic Modeling Exhibits Exhibit 2-1 Project Location ................................................................................. 2-2 Exhibit 2-2 Project Vicinity ................................................................................... 2-3 Exhibit 2-3 Existing Campus Layout - Aerial ....................................................... 2-4 Exhibit 2-4 Districts .............................................................................................. 2-9 Exhibit 2-5 Conceptual Land Plan ..................................................................... 2-13 Exhibit 2-6 Phasing Plan ................................................................................... 2-17 Exhibit 3.1-1 Location of Representative Views and Viewpoints ......................... 3.1-6 Exhibit 3.1-2 Viewpoint 1 ..................................................................................... 3.1-7 Exhibit 3.1-3 Viewpoint 2 ..................................................................................... 3.1-8 Exhibit 3.1-4 Viewpoint 3 ..................................................................................... 3.1-9 Exhibit 3.2-1 Sacramento County 2012 Emissions Inventory ............................ 3.2-13 Exhibit 3.9-1 Noise Measurement Locations in the Project Area ....................... 3.9-14 Page ii Headquarters Campus Master Plan EIR April 2018 Exhibit 3.9-2 Summary of 24-Hour Noise Measurement ................................... 3.9-15 Exhibit 3.10-1 Priority Investment Areas in the Vicinity of the Project Site ............................................................................................... 3.10-4 Exhibit 3.10-2 Study Area .................................................................................. 3.10-11 Exhibit 3.10-3 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations ................................................................... 3.10-14 Exhibit 3.10-4 Existing Peak Hour Driveway Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations ............................................................................ 3.10-15 Exhibit 3.10-5 Existing Transit Facilities ............................................................ 3.10-20 Exhibit 3.10-6 Existing Bicycle Facilities ............................................................ 3.10-23 Exhibit 3.10-7 Existing Pedestrian Facilities ...................................................... 3.10-25 Exhibit 3.10-8 Existing Employee Commute Travel Modes ............................... 3.10-30 Exhibit 3.10-9 Existing Headquarters Campus Employee Residences by ZIP Code .................................................................................... 3.10-32 Exhibit 3.10-10 Project Inbound Trip Distribution ................................................ 3.10-33 Exhibit 3.10-11 Project Outbound Trip Distribution.............................................. 3.10-34 Exhibit 3.10-12 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations ............................................. 3.10-36 Exhibit 3.10-13 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Driveway Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations ............................................. 3.10-37 Exhibit 4-1 SMUD HQCMP Cumulative Projects Map ......................................... 4-4 Exhibit 4-2 Cumulative No Project Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Latinos | Creating Shopping Centers to Meet Their Needs May 23, 2014 by Anthony Pingicer
    Latinos | Creating shopping centers to meet their needs May 23, 2014 by Anthony Pingicer Source: DealMakers.net One in every six Americans is Latino. Since 1980, the Latino population in the United States has increased dramatically from 14.6 million, per the Census Bureau, to exceeding 50 million today. This escalation is not just seen in major metropolitan cities and along the America-Mexico border, but throughout the country, from Cook County, Illinois to Miami-Dade, Florida. By 2050, the Latino population is projected to reach 134.8 million, resulting in a 30.2 percent share of the U.S. population. Latinos are key players in the nation’s economy. While the present economy benefits from Latinos, the future of the U.S. economy is most likely to depend on the Latino market, according to “State of the Hispanic Consumer: The Hispanic Market Imperative,” a report released by Nielsen, an advertising and global marketing research company. According to the report, the Latino buying power of $1 trillion in 2010 is predicted to see a 50 percent increase by next year, reaching close to $1.5 trillion in 2015. The U.S. Latino market is one of the top 10 economies in the world and Latino households in America that earn $50,000 or more are growing at a faster rate than total U.S. households. As for consumption trends, Latinos tend to spend more money per shopping trip and are also expected to become a powerful force in home purchasing during the next decade. Business is booming for Latinos. According to a study by the Partnership for a New Economy, the number of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-Assisted Projects 24 CFR Part 58
    Environmental Assessment Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-assisted Projects 24 CFR Part 58 Project Information Project Name: Sage at Folsom (Scholar Way Senior Apartment Community) Project Responsible Entity: Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Preparer: Michael Baker International, Incorporated Certifying Officer Name and Title: La Shelle Dozier, Executive Director, Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Consultant (if applicable): Michael Baker International, Incorporated Direct Comments to: Stephanie Green, Environmental Coordinator, Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency [email protected] 916-440-1302 Project Location: The Project Site is comprised of approximately 4.2 acres of undeveloped, previously disturbed land located immediately east of the intersection of Scholar Way and East Bidwell Street in the City of Folsom in Sacramento County, California. The address for the Project Site is 89 Scholar Way, Folsom, California, Sacramento County (Assessor Parcel Number [APN] 072-0270-157). The Project Site is surrounded by Scholar Way, College Point Business Park, and Folsom Lake College to the north; the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (church), Cavitt Drive, and a residential neighborhood to the east; the Broadstone Marketplace commercial center to the south; and Southern Pacific Railroad/Placerville & Sacramento Valley Railroad track, bike trail, and East Bidwell Street to the west. Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]: The Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) is proposing to use HUD HOME Investment Partnership funds to support construction of the Sage at Folsom project (Project), which would consist of the construction of 109 one-bedroom/one-bathroom units of affordable housing for seniors with one additional unit reserved for management staff (for a Project total of 110 units).
    [Show full text]
  • SACRAMENTO | RETAIL Q3 2017 Research & Forecast Report SACRAMENTO | RETAIL Q3 2017
    Research & Forecast Report SACRAMENTO | RETAIL Q3 2017 Research & Forecast Report SACRAMENTO | RETAIL Q3 2017 BIG ASORPTION AT DELTA SHORES, REST OF MARKET STABLE HEADING INTO HOLIDAYS Net absorption was well above average for Q3, but with the majority of new occupants taking newly constructed space, the overall vacancy rate hardly budged. A number of big box vacancies remain unfilled, but new developments are pushing average asking rates, the biggest shift evident in the vicinity of Downtown Commons and the new Delta Shores along I-5. The first new stores at these two major development sites have opened in the last 90 days or will open before the end of 2017. Meanwhile, the rest of the market has remained relatively stable, with no major retailers exiting or entering the market. Investors from outside the Sacramento market have been active, as properties in this market offer cap rates more than 100 basis points higher than Bay Area and Southern California markets and more than 50 basis points above the average for the Western region. Net Absorption Community Power > 373,290 square feet of positive net absorption was more than Market Indicators Neighborhood Regional Specialty Strip two times the three-year rolling average per quarter. Relative to prior period 2017 Q3 2017 Q3 2017 Q3 2017 Q3 > Roughly 60 percent of the absorption total came from new VACANCY Delta Shores tenants, including Dick’s Sporting Goods, PetSmart and Ross Dress for Less. NET ABSORPTION CONSTRUCTION Vacancy RENTAL RATE > The overall vacancy declined 10 basis points to 9.4 percent. > About a dozen notable big box vacancies (including Macy’s, Note: Construction is the change in SF Under construction Sports Authority, and Borders) comprise 12.6 percent of the total vacant square footage or 1.2 percent of the total market inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridership Report (October 2019)
    Ridership Report (October 2019) Year to Date Summary Category FY20 YTD FY19YTD Difference % Change Trailing 12 Month Trend Bus 3,518,921 3,415,852 103,069 3.0% 11,500,000 Light Rail 3,848,176 3,641,112 207,064 5.7% Rail Bus System Total 7,367,097 7,056,964 310,133 4.4% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus 1,059,668 1,014,352 45,316 4.5% 9,500,000 Light Rail 1,063,740 1,025,613 38,127 3.7% System Total 2,123,408 2,039,965 83,443 4.1% 9,000,000 Daily Summary Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 41,415 40,275 1,140 2.8% Bus (Sat) 15,390 13,266 2,124 16.0% Bus (Sun) 10,371 7,915 2,456 31.0% October Ridership by Mode Light Rail (M-F) 40,939 40,510 429 1.1% 6% Light Rail (Sat) 17,127 13,500 3,627 26.9% Light Rail Light Rail (Sun) 12,229 9,500 2,729 28.7% Fixed Route 48% Other Services E-Tran Ridership Summary (E-Van included) 46% Category Current Year Prior Year Difference % Change E-Tran (YTD) 280,319 266,440 13,879 5.2% E-Tran (Monthly) 84,775 81,648 3,127 3.8% Other services include E-Tran, Folsom, SmaRT Ride, CBS and Special Services E-Tran (Weekday) 3,560 3,426 134 3.9% Route Level Ridership Comparison (Bus) Weelday Route Comparison Saturday Route Comparison Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change 1 2,067 2,190 (124) -6% 1 768 777 (9) -1% 11 972 715 257 36% 11 447 282 165 59% 13 678 315 362 115% 13 426 - 426 15 795 1,215 (420) -35% 15 381 558 (176) -32% 19 423 658 (234) -36% 19 209 271
    [Show full text]
  • Store # Phone Number Store Shopping Center/Mall Address City ST Zip District Number 318 (907) 522-1254 Gamestop Dimond Center 80
    Store # Phone Number Store Shopping Center/Mall Address City ST Zip District Number 318 (907) 522-1254 GameStop Dimond Center 800 East Dimond Boulevard #3-118 Anchorage AK 99515 665 1703 (907) 272-7341 GameStop Anchorage 5th Ave. Mall 320 W. 5th Ave, Suite 172 Anchorage AK 99501 665 6139 (907) 332-0000 GameStop Tikahtnu Commons 11118 N. Muldoon Rd. ste. 165 Anchorage AK 99504 665 6803 (907) 868-1688 GameStop Elmendorf AFB 5800 Westover Dr. Elmendorf AK 99506 75 1833 (907) 474-4550 GameStop Bentley Mall 32 College Rd. Fairbanks AK 99701 665 3219 (907) 456-5700 GameStop & Movies, Too Fairbanks Center 419 Merhar Avenue Suite A Fairbanks AK 99701 665 6140 (907) 357-5775 GameStop Cottonwood Creek Place 1867 E. George Parks Hwy Wasilla AK 99654 665 5601 (205) 621-3131 GameStop Colonial Promenade Alabaster 300 Colonial Prom Pkwy, #3100 Alabaster AL 35007 701 3915 (256) 233-3167 GameStop French Farm Pavillions 229 French Farm Blvd. Unit M Athens AL 35611 705 2989 (256) 538-2397 GameStop Attalia Plaza 977 Gilbert Ferry Rd. SE Attalla AL 35954 705 4115 (334) 887-0333 GameStop Colonial University Village 1627-28a Opelika Rd Auburn AL 36830 707 3917 (205) 425-4985 GameStop Colonial Promenade Tannehill 4933 Promenade Parkway, Suite 147 Bessemer AL 35022 701 1595 (205) 661-6010 GameStop Trussville S/C 5964 Chalkville Mountain Rd Birmingham AL 35235 700 3431 (205) 836-4717 GameStop Roebuck Center 9256 Parkway East, Suite C Birmingham AL 35206 700 3534 (205) 788-4035 GameStop & Movies, Too Five Pointes West S/C 2239 Bessemer Rd., Suite 14 Birmingham AL 35208 700 3693 (205) 957-2600 GameStop The Shops at Eastwood 1632 Montclair Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Campus Master Plan
    Sacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Campus Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report • April 2018 State Clearinghouse #2017092050 Sacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Campus Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse #2017092050 April 2018 Lead Agency: Sacramento Municipal Utility District 6201 S Street, MS B203 Sacramento, CA 95817-1899 or P.O. Box 15830 MS B203 Sacramento, CA 95852-1830 Attn: Rob Ferrera (916) 732-6676 or [email protected] Prepared by: Ascent Environmental 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Chris Mundhenk [email protected] Headquarters Campus Master Plan EIR April 2018 Table of Contents Chapter/Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. ES-1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... ES-1 Summary Description of the Project ............................................................... ES-1 Environmental Impacts and Recommended Mitigation Measures .................. ES-5 Summary of Alternatives ................................................................................ ES-5 Areas of Controversy ...................................................................................... ES-7 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Intended Uses of this EIR .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
    - 2021-2024 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program SACOG MISSION BOARD MEMBERS AND MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Provide leadership and a Karm Bains, Sutter County dynamic, collaborative public Krista Bernasconi, City of Roseville forum for achieving an efficient regional transportation system, Gary Bradford, Yuba County innovative and integrated Chris Branscum, City of Marysville regional planning, and high quality of life within the greater Pamela Bulahan, City of Isleton Sacramento region. Trinity Burruss, City of Colfax Jan Clark-Crets, Town of Loomis Rich Desmond, Sacramento County Lucas Frerichs, City of Davis Sue Frost, Sacramento County Jill Gayaldo, City of Rocklin Lakhvir Ghag, City of Live Oak Bonnie Gore, Placer County Martha Guerrero, City of West Sacramento Shon Harris, City of Yuba City Rick Jennings, City of Sacramento Paul Joiner, City of Lincoln Patrick Kennedy, Sacramento County Mike Kozlowski, City of Folsom Rich Lozano, City of Galt Porsche Middleton, City of Citrus Heights Pierre Neu, City of Winters David Sander, City of Rancho Cordova Michael Saragosa, City of Placerville Don Saylor, Yolo County Jay Schenirer, City of Sacramento Matt Spokely, City of Auburn Tom Stallard, City of Woodland Darren Suen, City of Elk Grove Wendy Thomas, El Dorado County Rick West, City of Wheatland Amarjeet Benipal, Ex-Officio Member 2021-2024 MTIP Contents A Guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Contents Page Number Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Short Range Transit Plan Update Project Appendix G.1 Public
    Folsom Short Range Transit Plan Update Project Appendix G .1 Public Comments Summary BUS SERVICE Commuter Feeder Service to Folsom Light Rail Stations Feeder bus essential for Folsom residents to take advantage of light rail; should run all day. Need fast, quick feeders to/from light rail during peak commuter hours only . Local feeder routes need to be within walking distance of residences, not just businesses. Draft bus service plan seems to cater to commercial traffic much more than commuters . Why can't the commuter public be covered during peak time (i.e ., 6 AM - 7 :30 PM & 4 PM - 5 :30 PM) and commercial traffic off-peak. Consider different routes for commuters (5am - 9 am, 3pm - 7pm) than for in-town customers (run all day). Commute routes should be designed to serve largest neighborhood populations possible and travel quickly to L.R. stations . Daytime in-town routes would serve major retail, city hall, college, etc. Early a.m. pick up (bus stop) at East Natoma & Briggs Ranch to light rail to get me to work by 6:30 a.m. Maintain service on Folsom-Auburn Road from Folsom Dam Road and provide feeder service to Historic Folsom light rail station. Add a peak-only loop up Folsom-Auburn, Oak Avenue Parkway, American River Canyon, Greenback, right on Folsom-Auburn, up unused center lane ramp to the Historic Folsom light rail station. Residents in Orangevale seemed to get better service even though they already have current RT service ; RT and Folsom could make arrangements so Folsom would no longer have to loop out to Madison/Main (e .g.
    [Show full text]
  • HMO/PPO Vision Provider Directory
    Health Net Medicare Advantage HMO/PPO Vision Provider Directory This directory provides a list of Health Net Vision network providers. This directory is for Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange, Placer, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, San Joaquin, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Yolo counties. This directory is current as of August 2013. Some network providers may have been added or removed from our network after this directory was printed. We do not guarantee that each provider is still accepting new members. To get the most up-to-date information about Health Net Vision’s network providers in your area, you can visit www.healthnet.com or call our Member Services Department at Health Net Vision: 1-866-392-6058, Monday through Saturday, 5:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and Sunday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Pacific time (PT). TTY/TDD users can call 1-866-308-5375, Monday through Friday from 5:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. PT. Health Net has a contract with Medicare to offer HMO and PPO plans. Enrollment in a Medicare Advantage plan depends on contract renewal. This plan is available to anyone who has both Medical Assistance from the State and Medicare. This information is available for free in other languages. Please call our customer service number at: (HMO Plans) 1-800-275-4737. For (PPO) Plans: 1-800-960-4638. Our hours of operation are 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., seven days a week.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Service, Capital and Financial Plan
    Chapter 9 Transit Service, Capital and Financial Plan The basis for any transit plan is the development of an effective and appropriate service strategy. The types of service provided, their schedules and routes, and the quality of service can effective determine the success offailure of a transit system. This chapter presents the recommended service changes for implementation in October 2005 when the RT light rail service to Folsom begins, and other service options forfuture consideration over the next five years. Also included in this chapter is a capital plan for replacement of the transitf eet and a detailed financial plan for the City's transit division for fiscal years 2005/06 through 2010/11 that includes recommended modifications to the Folsom Stage Line fare structure. Transit Service Plan Service Recommendations for Phase I Implementation (October 2005) The following service changes are recommended for implementation on Monday, October 17, 2005 when the RT light rail extension to Folsom begins revenue service operations. 1) Discontinue all commuter bus service to Downtown Sacramento. 2) Discontinue the feeder bus service to the Butterfield light rail station. 3) Discontinue the tripper transfer service. 4) Restructure local fixed service (Route 10) into a local feeder route (Route A) that provides service to the Iron Point and Historic Folsom light rail stations, maintaining the connection to RT route 24 at Main/Madison in Orangevale. New local service would be provided on Iron Point Road between East Bidwell Street and Folsom Boulevard, and would continue to serve Folsom Lake Community College . The route alignment is described in Chapter 5 as Alternative Route A (blue route on the map on Figure 25 on page 131 .
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIN TOWNE CENTRE NWC Florin Road & Stockton Boulevard - Sacramento, CA
    A PROUD MEMBER OF FLORIN TOWNE CENTRE NWC Florin Road & Stockton Boulevard - Sacramento, CA Jason K. Gallelli Kevin M. Soares Matt N. Goldstein Gallelli Real Estate Executive Vice President Senior Vice President Senior Associate 3005 Douglas Blvd., Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95661 CA DRE #01143594 CA DRE #01291491 CA DRE #01886233 P 916 772 1700 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.GallelliRE.com Gary B. Gallelli, Broker Licensed as Real Estate Salespersons by the CA DRE. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. While we have no reason to doubt its accuracy, we do not guarantee it. © CA DRE #00811881 Gallelli Real Estate. All Rights Reserved. A PROUD MEMBER OF FLORIN TOWNE CENTRE PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS & DEMOGRAPHICS location: NWC Florin Road and Stockton Boulevard Sacramento, CA anchor tenants: Wal-Mart Super-Center, 24 Hour Fitness, Petsmart, Cash & Carry, Auto Zone Mega 2017 total population 2017 daytime population Hub 1-mile 15,783 1-mile 19,154 3-mile 132,271 3-mile 145,929 shopping center GLA: ±480,455 Square Feet (GLA) 5-mile 360,106 5-mile 385,938 availability: ±1,050 - 8,000 SF Shops & Pads ±40,000 SF Jr Anchor Space traffic counts 2017 total households 2017 average HH income Florin Rd (at Stockton Blvd) 33,494 1-mile 6,927 1-mile $70,667 Stockton Blvd (at Florin Rd) 30,724 3-mile 53,655 3-mile $78,471 65th Street (at Florin Rd) 15,039 5-mile 135,094 5-mile $73,715 Jason K. Gallelli Kevin M.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Folsom, California
    CITY OF FOLSOM, CALIFORNIA FY 2010-11 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CCiittyy ooff FFoollssoomm,, CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa CCaappiittaall IImmpprroovveemmeenntt PPllaann FFiissccaall YYeeaarr 22001100--1111 City Council Jeffrey M. Starsky, Mayor Andrew J. Morin, Vice Mayor Kerri Howell, Council Member Steve Miklos, Council Member Ernie Sheldon, Council Member Kerry L. Miller, City Manager James W. Francis, Chief Financial Officer Prepared by the Finance Department – Budget & Evaluation Division Terri Hemley, Budget & Evaluation Manager Scott Denny, Financial Analyst Deanne Gabrik, Administrative Assistant June 2010 Table of Contents Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) CIP Introduction CIP Message, City Manager’s ............................................................................................1 CIP Introduction..................................................................................................................3 Summary of CIP Appropriation by Category .....................................................................10 Summary of Total CIP Appropriation by Category............................................................18 Summary of CIP by Funding Source..................................................................................20 Projects Culture and Recreation .......................................................................................................21 Drainage..............................................................................................................................59 General Services
    [Show full text]