DOCSLIB.ORG

A. Bizimungu ’S Sentencing Appeal (G Round 20)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A. Bizimungu ’S Sentencing Appeal (G Round 20) Tribunal Pénal International pour le Rwanda International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Liu Daqun Judge Carmel Agius Judge Khalida Rachid Khan Judge Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov Registrar: Mr. Bongani Majola Judgement of: 30 June 2014 AUGUSTIN BIZIMUNGU v. THE PROSECUTOR Case No. ICTR-00-56B-A ________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGEMENT ________________________________________________________________________________ Counsel for Augustin Bizimungu : The Office of the Prosecutor : Mr. Gilles St-Laurent Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow Mr. James J. Arguin Mr. Abdoulaye Seye Mr. Abubacarr Tambadou Ms. Thembile M. Segoete Ms. Florida Kabasinga Mr. Takeh Sendze Ms. Christiana Fomenky Ms. Sunkarie Ballah-Conteh Ms. Betty Mbabazi Mr. Deo Mbuto CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 A. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 1 B. THE APPEALS ............................................................................................................................... 2 II. STANDARDS OF APPELLATE REVIEW ............................................................................... 4 III. APPEAL OF AUGUSTIN BIZIMUNGU ................................................................................. 6 A. FAILURE TO MAKE LEGAL FINDINGS (G ROUNDS 3, 14, 17 TO 19, IN PART ) .................................. 6 1. Genocide .................................................................................................................................. 6 2. Crimes Against Humanity........................................................................................................ 9 3. Serious Violations of Article 3 Common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II ............................................................................................................................ 11 4. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 12 B. RWANKERI SECTOR (G ROUNDS 1 TO 7) ...................................................................................... 13 1. Notice ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2. Assessment of the Evidence of Prosecution Witness GAP ................................................... 20 3. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 26 C. SUPERIOR RESPONSIBILITY (G ROUNDS 8 TO 13 AND 15 TO 17, IN PART ) .................................... 27 1. Notice of Elements of Superior Responsibility ..................................................................... 27 (a) Identification of Subordinates and Effective Control ............................................................. 28 (b) Criminal Acts of Bizimungu’s Subordinates ......................................................................... 33 (c) Knowledge of his Subordinates’ Crimes ................................................................................ 36 (d) Failure to Prevent or Punish his Subordinates ....................................................................... 38 (e) Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 39 2. Authority and Effective Control Over Soldiers and Interahamwe ........................................ 39 (a) Authority and Effective Control Over Soldiers of the Rwandan Army ................................. 39 (b) Authority and Effective Control over Interahamwe .............................................................. 46 3. Bizimungu’s Knowledge of the Crimes of his Subordinates ................................................. 51 4. Failure to Prevent Crimes and Punish Culpable Subordinates .............................................. 57 5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 64 D. JOSEPHITE BROTHERS COMPOUND (G ROUND 14) ....................................................................... 65 1. Assessment of the Evidence................................................................................................... 65 2. Bizimungu’s Knowledge ....................................................................................................... 68 3. Failure to Make Legal Findings ............................................................................................. 71 4. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 73 E. CYANGUGU STADIUM (G ROUND 15) ........................................................................................... 74 1. Failure to Consider the Ntagerura et al . Case ....................................................................... 74 2. Assessment of the Credibility of Prosecution Witnesses ....................................................... 78 3. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 80 F. BUTARE PREFECTURE OFFICE AND THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF RWANDA (EER) (G ROUND 16) 81 1. Involvement of Soldiers in the Crimes .................................................................................. 81 (a) Killings ................................................................................................................................... 81 (b) Rapes ...................................................................................................................................... 84 2. Bizimungu’s Knowledge ....................................................................................................... 88 3. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 92 G. ÉCOLE DES SCIENCES INFIRMI ERES DE KABGAYI (ESI) (G ROUND 17) ........................................... 93 1. Effective Control Over the Perpetrators ................................................................................ 93 2. Failure to Consider Witness DA5-2’s Evidence .................................................................... 95 3. Bizimungu’s Knowledge ....................................................................................................... 96 4. Failure to Make Legal Findings ............................................................................................. 98 i Case No. ICTR-00-56B-A 30 June 2014 (a) Genocide................................................................................................................................. 98 (b) Murder and Rape as Crimes Against Humanity .................................................................. 100 5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 101 H. MUSAMBIRA COMMUNE OFFICE AND DISPENSARY (G ROUND 18) ........................................... 102 1. Assessment of Prosecution Evidence................................................................................... 102 2. Failure to Consider Defence Evidence ................................................................................ 105 3. Bizimungu’s Knowledge ..................................................................................................... 107 4. Failure to Make Legal Findings ........................................................................................... 109 (a) Genocide............................................................................................................................... 109 (b) Murder as a Crime Against Humanity ................................................................................. 111 5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 113 I. TRAFIPRO (G ROUND 19) ......................................................................................................... 114 1. Assessment of Evidence ...................................................................................................... 114 2. Bizimungu’s Knowledge ..................................................................................................... 117 3. Failure to Make Legal Findings ........................................................................................... 120 (a) Genocide............................................................................................................................... 120 (b) Murder and Rape as Crimes Against Humanity .................................................................. 122 4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 123 IV. APPEAL OF THE PROSECUTION ..................................................................................... 124 A. RWANKERI SECTOR (G ROUND 1) ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Press Clippings
    SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE A downtown view of central Freetown from above Hill Cot Road. PRESS CLIPPINGS Enclosed are clippings of local and international press on the Special Court and related issues obtained by the Outreach and Public Affairs Office as at: Friday, 20 May 2011 Press clips are produced Monday through Friday. Any omission, comment or suggestion, please contact Martin Royston-Wright Ext 7217 2 International News Ouattara Asks ICC to Investigate Post-Poll Violence / RFI Page 3 ICTR Prosecutor Welcomes Ex-Army Chief's Sentence / The New Times Page 4 Military Officers Convicted of Killing of Premier / Hirondelle News Agency Page 5 State Seeks to Reply to Ocampo's Claims / The Standard Page 6 3 Thursday, 19 May 2011 Ouattara Asks ICC to Investigate Post-Poll Violence Côte d'Ivoire's President Alassane Ouattara has asked the International Criminal Court (ICC) to open an investigation into the violence that swept the country following the disputed November election. Ouattara sent a letter, dated 3 May, to ICC President Luis Moreno-Ocampo asking the court to investigate "the most serious crimes committed since 28 November 2010 throughout the Ivorian territory". ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo has said his office is preparing to launch a formal investigation into mass killings which allegedly took place in the west African country. There were reports of a massacre of several hundred people in Duékoué, in the west of the country, in the fighting that followed November's presidential election. The UN, the African Union and the European Union all recognised Ouattara as the rightful winner.
    [Show full text]
  • Ndindilyimana Et
    INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Asoka de Silva, Presiding Judge Judge Taghrid Hikmet Judge Seon Ki Park Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 17 May 2011 PROSECUTOR Against Augustin NDINDILIYIMANA Augustin BIZIMUNGU François-Xavier NZUWONEMEYE Innocent SAGAHUTU Case No. ICTR-00-56-T SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE Office of the Counsel for the Defence Prosecutor: Mr. Alphonse Van Mr. Christopher Black & Mr. Vincent Mr. Moussa Sefon Lurquin for Augustin Ndindiliyimana Mr. Lloyd Strickland Mr. Gilles St. Laurent & Mr. Benoît Mr.Abubacarr Tambadou Henry for Augustin Bizimungu Ms. Faria Rekkas Mr. Charles Taku & Ms. Beth Lyons for F. X. Nzuwonemeye Mr. Fabian Segatwa & Mr. Saidou Doumbia for Innocent Sagahutu 17 May 2011 The Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana et al, ICTR-00-56-T CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 II. EVENTS IN RWANDA AFTER 6 APRIL 1994 ........................................................................ 2 III. PRELIMINARY ISSUES ........................................................................................................... 3 IV. FACTUAL FINDINGS ............................................................................................................... 3 A. COUNT 1: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ........................................................................... 3 B. COUNTS 2 AND 3: GENOCIDE AND COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE IN THE ALTERNATIVE ..................
    [Show full text]
  • At the Heart of Rwanda's Horror General's History Offers Clues to the Roots of Genocide
    At the Heart of Rwanda's Horror General's History Offers Clues to the Roots of Genocide By Emily Wax Washington Post Foreign Service Saturday, September 21, 2002; Page A01 NYANGE, Rwanda -- She remembers the days when her brother, the army general, landed his "bird machine" in this hilltop village. In his dashing uniform and beret, he ordered up a new house for her, a new house for their mother and rounds of Rwanda's golden beer, Primus, for their childhood friends. "It was like my brother was king," said Maria Mukako, her three children clinging to her as flies buzzed around their bare feet. "Now I hear on the radio that people are saying my brother is more like the devil." Her brother, Augustin Bizimungu, former chief of staff of the Rwandan army, sits with 53 others in a detention center in Arusha, Tanzania, awaiting trial by the U.N.-mandated International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. He is accused of being an architect of the state-sponsored genocide that killed more than 800,000 people. Over 100 days in 1994, after the assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana, Rwanda's Hutu majority carried out the organized slaughter of the country's Tutsi minority and Hutus who sympathized with them. Under Bizimungu's command, soldiers exterminated the "cockroach Tutsis" on a scale so massive that eight years later, just about every Rwandan has a parent or sibling -- or both -- who was raped, buried alive or hacked apart with a machete. "He's one of our most important arrests," said Kingsley Chiedu Moghalu, legal adviser to the tribunal.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Rwandan Genocide Fugitive Arrested in the DRC
    Former Rwandan Genocide Fugitive Arrested in the DRC Today 9 December 2015 mark another turning point for victims of the Rwandan tragedy as the DRC authorities have arrested Mr. Ntaganzwa who was ʺindicted by the ICTR for genocide and crimes against humanity for the alleged massacre of thousands of Tutsis at various locations in his locality including at Cyahinda Parish and at Gasasa Hill during the 1994 Rwandan genocide against Tutsis during which moderate Hutus and others who opposed the genocide were killed.1 He was also alleged to have orchestrated the rape and sexual violence committed against many women, and was one of the six fugitives whose cases were referred to Rwanda by the Prosecutor of the ICTR under Rule 11bis for trialʺ2 Following his arrest in Kachanga, North Kivu, the Prosecutor of the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunal Mr. Jallow Hassan has informed the Security Council about the arrest of Mr. Ntaganzwa, he has equally thanked the DRC authorities and urges them to immediately transfer him from Goma where he is being held to Arusha to face trials.3 His arrest was precipitated as a result of a ransom of five million US Dollars bounty, however, eight other fugitives (Felicien Kabuga, Augustin Bizimana, Protais Mpiranya, Fulgence Kayishema, Pheneas Munyarugarama, Aloys Ndimbati, Ryandikayo, and Charles Sikubwabo) are yet to be apprehended to face trials, there is equally a ransom of five million US dollars for any information leading to their capture.4 The accused ethnic origin is Hutu. He was a school teacher and football referee and from 1992 – 1994 held the position of secretary general for the National Republican Movement for Democracy and Development for Gisenyi city and equally the president of the Interahamwe militia for the Gisenyi prefecture, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded License
    journal of international peacekeeping 22 (2018) 40-59 JOUP brill.com/joup Rwanda’s Forgotten Years Reconsidering the Role and Crimes of Akazu 1973–1993 Andrew Wallis University of Cambridge [email protected] Abstract The narrative on the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda has become remark- able in recent years for airbrushing the responsibility of those at its heart from the tragedy. The figure of President Juvenal Habyarimana, whose 21-year rule, along with the unofficial network based around his wife and family, the Akazu, has been largely marginalised. Yet to understand April 1994 requires a far longer-term understanding. Those responsible had grown their power, influence and ambition for decades inside every part of Rwandan society after seizing power in their coup of 1973; they had estab- lished personal and highly lucrative bonds with European and North American coun- tries, financial institutions and the Vatican, all of whom variously assisted with finan- cial, political, diplomatic and military support from 1973 into 1994. This chapter seeks to outline how Akazu built its powerbase, influence and ambition in the two decades before 1994 and the failure of its international backers to respond to repeated warning signs of a tragedy foretold. Keywords genocide – Akazu – Habyarimana – Parmehutu – Network Zero The official Independence Day celebrations that got underway on Sunday 1 July 1973 came as Rwanda teetered on the edge of an expected coup. Eleven years after independence the one party regime of President Grégoire Kayiban- da was imploding. Hit by economic and political stagnation, notably the dam- aging failure to share the trappings of power with those outside his central © Andrew Wallis, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18754112-0220104004 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded License.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council
    United Nations A/69/206–S/2014/546 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 August 2014 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-ninth session Sixty-ninth year Item 72 of the provisional agenda* Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994 Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly and to the members of the Security Council the nineteenth annual report of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, submitted by the President of the International Tribunal for Rwanda in accordance with article 32 of its statute (see Security Council resolution 955 (1994), annex), which states: The President of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall submit an annual report of the International Tribunal for Rwanda to the Security Council and to the General Assembly. * A/69/150. 14-57957 (E) 140814 *1457957* A/69/206 S/2014/546 Letter of transmittal 1 August 2014 Excellencies, I have the honour to submit the nineteenth annual report of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994, dated 1 August 2014, to the General Assembly and the Security Council, pursuant to article 32 of the statute of the International Tribunal.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Hotel Rwanda: Genocide Ideology, Reconciliation, and Rescuers Lars Waldorf Version of Record First Published: 30 Apr 2009
    This article was downloaded by: [United Nations] On: 19 April 2013, At: 07:23 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Genocide Research Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjgr20 Revisiting Hotel Rwanda: genocide ideology, reconciliation, and rescuers Lars Waldorf Version of record first published: 30 Apr 2009. To cite this article: Lars Waldorf (2009): Revisiting Hotel Rwanda: genocide ideology, reconciliation, and rescuers, Journal of Genocide Research, 11:1, 101-125 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623520802703673 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Journal of Genocide Research (2009), 11(1), March, 101–125 Revisiting Hotel Rwanda: genocide ideology, reconciliation, and rescuers LARS WALDORF This article examines the tensions between the Rwandan government’s discourse on reconciliation and its fight against negationism.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Sexual Violence Elements of the Judgments
    Front cover image: The Security Council unanimously adopting resolution 1888 on 30 September 2009 REVIEW OF THE SEXUAL VIOLENCE ELEMENTS OF THE JUDGMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA, AND THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE IN THE LIGHT OF SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1820 SEXUAL VIOLENCE INCONFLICTS ARMED VIOLENCE SEXUAL The chief purpose of this report is to review sexual-violence elements of the judgments of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the UN-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) against the background of Security Council Resolution 1820 of 19 June 2008. Contact: Peacekeeping Best Practices Section (PBPS), Division for Policy, Evaluation and Training (DPET), Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO). © United Nations 2010 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Language: English Sales #: E.10.VIII.1 Price USD: 22 ISBN: 978-92-1-137032-4 United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations REVIEW OF THE SEXUAL VIOLENCE ELEMENTS OF THE JUDGMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA, AND THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE IN THE LIGHT OF SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1820 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This review and the accompanying Basic Toolkit of Key Readings and Sources of Potential Relevance to SCR 1820 and 1888 were prepared for the Division for Policy, Evaluation and Training (DPET) of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) by Mr Gabriel Oosthuizen, Executive Director of International Criminal Law Services (ICLS). DPKO is grateful to the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany for funding this review.
    [Show full text]
  • Scramble for the Congo; Anatomy of an Ugly
    SCRAMBLE FOR THE CONGO ANATOMY OF AN UGLY WAR 20 December 2000 ICG Africa Report N° 26 Nairobi/Brussels Table of Contents MAPS DRC: MONUC Deployment ............................................................................. i DRC: Deployment of Other Forces ................................................................ ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS...................................... iii I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................... 1 II. THE STALEMATE ON THE CONVENTIONAL FRONTLINES .................... 2 A. The Equateur Front ............................................................................. 4 B. The Kasai and Katanga Fronts............................................................. 6 C. Rwanda and Uganda Also Come to Blows........................................... 8 D. Conclusion to the Military Situation.................................................. 10 III. THE MANAGEMENT OF CHAOS: THE REBEL WAR EFFORT AND ITS CONSEQUENCES ................................................................................ 11 A. The Breakdown of the Rwandan-Ugandan Alliance.......................... 11 B. Rwanda and Burundi’s Unfinished Civil Wars, and Local conflicts in the Kivus ........................................................................................... 11 1. The Rwandan Patriotic Army versus ALiR ........................................... 11 2. The Burundian Armed Forces versus the FDD/FNL .............................. 18 3. The Failure of the RCD.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International •
    Vt-JAMIl2., / vrV CLA '55 L r LED PLEASE RETAIN UN ARCHIVES ORIGINAL ORDER SERIES S-lILO BOX \:1 FILE l~ ACC. \ t:t 9. 8t' () '2-,~ Aamnest~ c.tt: International withthecompliments of • aveclescompliments de • conatentossaludos de 9.v.f, \ go (44)(71) 4135500 Telex: 28502 FAX: 9561157 Ki ~AL,.,i INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT 1 Easton Street London WC1X 8DJ 11...·+--'''' • r- 08-JUN-199S 18:17 [EMBARGOED FOR: 13 June 1995] •• • - amnesty international • RWANDA Arming the perpetrators of the genocide 13 June 1995 AI Index: AFR 02114195 Distr: SC/CC/CO - INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT. 1EASTON STREET, LONDON WC"~>: 8DJ. UNIJ.ED KINGDOM P.03 RWANDA Arminqthe perpetrators of the genocide The events which occurred in Rwanda between April and July] 994 were crimes against humanity. Thearms that were supplied to thegovernment at the time were used to carry out acts of genocide, deliberate and arbitrarykillings and other grave human rights violations. Thereis nowmounting evidence that similar types of arms continueto reach the perpetrators of these crimes who are now outside Rwanda inothercountries. Amnesty International is extremelyconcerned by persistentreports oflarge supplies . of weapons and ammunition reaching the perpetrators of crimes against humanity in Rwanda, namely the Forces armees rwandaises (FAR - the former Rwandese Armed Forces) and the Imerahamwe militia,' who continue to commit human rights abuses. The supplies arrive via Goma airport in eastern Zaire. In May ]995, these reports were continuiug, Someof the weapons and ammunition have been used by these forces for cross­ borderincursions from Zaire into Rwanda where political killings have. taken place and have also been used to intimidate Rwandese refugees to preventthem from returning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rwandan Genocide and Its Aftermath
    The Rwandan genocide 10 and its aftermath Ethnic tensions and armed conflict in the Great Lakes region of Central Africa have been the cause of repeated instances of human displacement.The pattern of events in the last 50 years is rooted in a long history of violence, but it is also a story of missed opportunities, on the part of both local actors and the international community in general. Failure to pursue just solutions to old grievances has in all too many cases, years or decades later, led to a recurrence of violence and to bloodletting on an even greater scale than before. The legacy of the 1959–63 crisis in Rwanda (described in Chapter 2) was the presence of Tutsi refugees in all neighbouring countries. Denied the possibility of repatriation for the next three decades, they nevertheless maintained links with the Tutsi in Rwanda. In the late 1980s, Tutsi exiles in Uganda, who had joined Yoweri Museveni’s National Resistance Army (NRA) to fight against the regime of Milton Obote, and who had come to form part of the Ugandan national armed forces when the NRA came to power, began to plot a military comeback, creating the Rwandan Patriotic Front (Front patriotique rwandais, or RPF). The RPF attacked Rwanda in 1990. The ensuing armed conflict and internal political pressure led to the power-sharing Arusha Agreement of August 1993, but the accord was never effectively implemented. Tensions between the Hutu and Tutsi increased sharply following the assassination of the President of Burundi, Melchior Ndadaye, a Hutu, in October 1993.This resulted in mass killings of Tutsi in Burundi, and then mass killings of Hutu.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Said
    e_ _ .~ ....i:._:::..__ JEASE RETAIN L I.{ e C0tV FLO e:. t-..J T 1. (::) \.- 1 IGINAL ORDER E l-/uJ GAP"R.. '2. 0 0 4 UNARGHIVES SERIES S-.JJ1Q BOX 52- FILE 5" ACC. l'14'010 'LI s . 4t ... eyey ... AUG-17-1995 01:19 UNITED NATIONS HQ NEWYORK ~ . 5601 P.10 10/14 .. • UNITED STATES MISSION TO THE U~ITED NAT10~S 799 United Nations Plaza New York, N.Y. 10017 Tel. 212-415-4050 PRESS RELEASE FAX 212-415-4:053 FOR RELEASE ON DELIVERY PRESS RELEASE USUN #124-(95) CHECK TEXT AGAINST DELIVERY August 16, 1995 Statement by Ambassador Karl F. Inderfurth, United States Alternate Representative to the united Nations for Special Political Affairs, in Explanation of Vote, in the Security Council, on the Rwandan Arms Embargo Resolution, August 16, 1995 --------------------------------------------------------~--------~- Mr. Ptesident, the United States has just cast its vote in favor Of a resolution which removes the arms embar90 placed upon the previous government of Rwanda. The current government of Rwanda has been seeking this change for a number of months, and we have supported their request from the beginning. The government of Rwanda faces a threat from extremists in the militias and former .army, who will continue to be restricted f~om buyin9 arms. With the adoption of this resolution, the Government of Rwanda will be better able to deter violent action by these groups or, if ~ecessarYt defend the new Rwandan society it is trying to build. The Government of Rwanda has agreed to cettain conditions, such as reporting their purchases to the Council, in order to assuage the concerns of Council members and neighboring states.
    [Show full text]