As Homeopathy Progresses Through the Third Century Since Its Founding by Samuel Hahnemann, It Is Timely to Reflect – Not
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Development and Use of Hering's Law Assessment Tool (HELAT) In
HRI Research Article Issue 18 Winter 2012 The development and use of Hering’s Law Assessment Tool (HELAT) in clinical trials Hugh Harrison Community Clinical Sciences Division, University of Southampton Medical School, Complementary Medicine Research,Primary Medical Care, Aldemoor Health Centre, Aldemoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST The aim of this paper is to describe the development of an evaluation tool – the Hering’s Law Assessment Tool (HELAT) – by a research team at Southampton University, as part of a randomised controlled trial of homeopathy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.1 Beginning with an exploration of the origin of Hering’s Law and its subsequent use in both the teaching and practice of homeopathy, the potential of HELAT as a valid evaluative measure in clinical trials is explored. Introduction b) a summary evaluation utilising a visual analogue scale (VAS)* (Figure 1b) to monitor changes in the patient’s chief ‘Hering’s Law of Cure’ is used by many homeopaths to help complaint, vitality and aspects of wellbeing (physical, emotional assess clinical outcomes. These ‘Laws’ are an historical and spiritual). A VAS also recorded practitioner confidence in evolution of Dr Samuel Hahnemann’s observations and their assessment as a reflective tool. thoughts regarding clinical changes occurring in patients after taking a homeopathic prescription.2 Hahnemann’s ideas were What is HELAT? subsequently developed by Dr Constantine Hering,3 then latterly emphasised by Dr James Tyler Kent.4 These ‘rules’ suggest The HELAT flowchart aims to allocate any symptom presented that following a homeopathic constitutional remedy, healing by a patient after taking the remedy to one of eleven possible occurs by stimulating the patient’s ‘vital force’ which responds categories coded A – K, which are then simplified into four by eliciting a distinct and consistent pattern.5,6 Hering’s Law categories: stipulates that during a curative response to a prescription, symptoms improve in the following way: 1. -
Regular Medicine: Can’T Live Without, Won’T Heal Within
Regular Medicine: can’t live without, won’t heal within. The Case of the Dutch Homeopathic Physician Research Master Thesis History and Philosophy of Science September 2018 – July 2019 Anne F. Knape Student number: 4027043 Supervisor: dr. H.M. Huistra Second supervisor: prof. dr. F.G. Huisman Figure 1 Alexander Beideman (1826-1869), Homeopathy Looks at the Horrors of Allopathy, 1857. Image available via Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain; INDEX INDEX 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 INTRODUCTION 5 CHAPTER 1: ALTERNATIVE IN ORIGINS 8 The similia principle: the diagnosis is the cure 9 High Dilutions 11 Self-healing capacity 12 SCIENCE: IMPOSSIBILITY and INCORPORATION 12 CHAPTER 2: CURRENT DEBATES 16 TERMINOLOGY 16 CURRENT RESEARCH 16 The INTERVIEWS 20 CHAPTER 3: HOMEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS IN ACTION 24 HOMEOPATHY in ACTION 25 REGULAR MEDICINE: DIAGNOSTICS, THERAPEUTICS and STATUS 26 REGULAR MEDICINE and its DISCONTENTS 32 Regular medicine: can’t cure everything 35 Regular Medicine: accepting side-effects 37 Regular diagnosis: ignoring important causes of disease 38 Regular medicine: limiting organization 40 Regular medicine: does it really cure? 41 HYBRID PRACTICES 42 Homeopathy as complementary medicine 42 The hammer scenario: regular consult, homeopathic remedy 43 Hybrid medicine 44 CHAPTER 4: BOUNDARIES AND HYBRIDITY 47 Le TERRAIN se TOUT 50 SCIENCE and the PRESCRIPTION of HIGH DULUTIONS 53 FINAL THOUGHTS 58 2 GP’s in TROUBLE 59 EXTINCTION of the HOMEOPATISCH HUISARTS 60 BIBLIOGRAPHY 62 APPENDIX 67 CHAPTER 2: Current Debates 67 CHAPTER 3: Homeopathic Physicians -
Discussion Samuel Hahnemann Was a Scientist. His Writings Appear To
Foundation Course in Medical Homeopathy (Dr Russell Malcolm & RLHIM Team ) Discussion Samuel Hahnemann was a scientist. His writings appear to reveal a fundamental belief in God, but in his day to day work he was humanistic in outlook and had great difficulty reconciling human suffering with the medicines available to him. His writings indicate how distressed he became when he perceived the damage that inappropriate treatment inflicted on vulnerable patients. His indignation was heightened by the knowledge that death and suffering caused by poor medical treatment, could be prevented, if medical practice was more self-critical and the knowledge base was more reliable. One of the few medical writers that Hahnemann had respect for, was the English Physician Thomas Sydenham. Sydenham had been working and writing around 140 years earlier, but had made a conscious decision to apply the scientific principles of Francis Bacon. The epistemology of clinical medicine relies heavily on observations of how ill patients respond to a treatment. Reliable conclusions can be drawn only when comparable cases are treated systematically, with preparations that are standardised. In addition the clinical observations require to be confirmed in comparable cases and compared to similar groups of individuals who are either treated differently, or left untreated. Sydenham provided ways of identifying and classifying illness into diagnostic groups and also conducted clinical trials. His most notable discovery concerned the use of Peruvian bark (quinine) in the early clinical stages of infection (epidemic haemorrhagic viral fevers, plague). By carefully recording the circumstances of each case, he was able to determine that the mortality was much higher in patients whose fever was suppressed with quinine in the first stages of the infection. -
Australian Report
Celebrating 175 years The Faculty of Homeopathy Newsletter November 2019 Public pressure forces the publication of the ‘hidden’ Australian report ampaigners have succeeded Interestingly, she went on to issue a in forcing Australia’s leading clarification in relation to the second Cresearch organisation to publish review, stating that it “did not conclude a report on homeopathy that it had that homeopathy was ineffective”. This tried to suppress. Its publication has been raises the question as to why the NHMRC hailed as “a major win for transparency did not try to correct the damning and public accountability in research”. reports to the contrary that appeared The 300-page draft report was in the media and repeated by anti- the result of a study conducted in homeopathy campaigners. 2012 into the clinical effectiveness of Rachel Roberts, HRI chief homeopathy by Australia’s National executive, said: “For over three years Health and Medical Research Council the NHMRC have refused to release (NHMRC), but the research body their 2012 draft report on homeopathy, decided not to make its findings Rachel Roberts, HRI chief executive despite Freedom of Information public. Instead, it commissioned requests and even requests by members a second review that concluded campaign calling on the NHMRC to of the Australian Senate. To see this homeopathy had no therapeutic value publish the first report, which resulted document finally seeing the light of beyond placebo. On publication in in tens of thousands of people signing day is a major win for transparency 2015, the review’s findings were widely an online petition and questions being and public accountability in research.” reported in the media as the definitive asked in the Australian Senate. -
Volume 1:Number 1, January 1912
THE HOMOEOPATHICIAN A JOURNAL FOR PURE HOMOEOPATHY EDITED BY JAMES TYLER KENT, A.M., M.D., and JULIA C. LOOS, M,D., H.M. PUBLISHED BY HOMOEOPATHICIAN PUBLISHING CO., HARRISBURG, PA. Application made for entrance as second-class matter at the post office at Harrisburg, Pa., under Act of March 3, 1879. SUBSCRIPTION PRICE, $2 per year in advance; single conies, 20 cents; postage on foreign subscriptions, SO cents additional. Vol. I JANUARY, 1912 No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE and FRONTISPIECE—James Tyler Kent, A.M., M.D. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY OF HOMOEOPATHICIANS— Bureau of Philosophy of Homoeopathy: Address Preliminary to the Study of Materia Medica.. ............ James Tyler Kent, M.D... 3 Bureau of Materia Medica; Stramonium ....................... .Fredericka E. Gladwin, M.D... 9 Annual Meeting of 1911.. ....................................... 11 SCIENCE AND ART OF HOMOEOPATHY— Kent's Repertory an Aid in Applying the Doctrines of Hahnemann..... Julia C.Loos, M.D.. 17 Homoeopathic Nosodes...............Frances D. Bloomingiton, M.D... 22 MATERIA MEDICA— The Proving of Radium Bromide ...... Guy Beckley Stearns, M.D... 27 CLINICAL CASES— Diphtheria ........... H. Henderson Patrick, M.D., Glasgow, Scotland.. 33 Diagnosis versus the Homoeopathic Prescription .................... William Heinrich Schwartz, M.D... 35 EDITORIAL— Greeting—Our Cover Design....................................... 38 HOMES AND GROUNDS OF HAHNEMANN (Illustrated). BANQUET OF EIGHTH Q, I. CONGRESS AT CONNAUGHT HALL, LONDON, ENGLAND (Illustrated). CURRENT REVIEW— Eighth Quinquennial International Congress of Homoeopathy.......... 40 Work of the Field Secretary of the American Institute of Homoeopathy.. 41 COLLEGE STUDENTS.................................................. 43 THE PATIENT'S VIEW— What Homoeopathy Is and Is Not ............A. H. Arndt, M.D.. -
Origins Kent's Philosophy
Journal of the American Institute valued by modern homeopaths. An overall question and a particular theme is whether a of Homeopathy: Vol. 77 No 4 medical practice with such a spiritual inheritance 1984. can claim to be a science - and whether the The Origins of Kent's Homeopathy spiritual aspect is essential for effective practice. by Francis Treuherz*, MA It is my intention to explore two main areas: the spiritual influences on homeopathy as evidenced Francis Treuherz is a research student in in the role of Swedenborg's writings in the ideas sociology, and a visiting lecturer in Social of certain prominent homeopaths, that is, an Science and Administration at the University of intellectual history; and the relevance of past or London, Goldsmith's College. This paper is part present spiritual connections for the current of a larger project on 'The Social Construction of practice and scientific status of homeopathy. a Rejected Science: Homeopathic Medicine'. (written in 1983) Although there are not sharply opposing 'camps' or 'schools', one 'spiritual' and the other 'scientific', there is certainly evidence of *Francis Treuherz MA RSHom FSHom controversy about the nature and significance of is once again editor of The Homeopath, the esoteric in homeopathy. (Journal of the Society of Homeopaths, editor 1986-1993). A former Honorary The discussion centres around lengthy difficult Secretary of the Society of Homeopaths quotations, sometimes in archaic language, and sometimes in technical terms. I consider them he was a visiting lecturer at the essential to the argument, and worth unravelling University of Westminster and many for an understanding of what may be a different other homeopathy schools and paradigm of medicine, and to extend our conferences in Amsterdam, Chichester, understanding of concepts of normal or marginal Dublin, Galway Helskinki, London, science. -
Taking the Case of Homeopathy Juliet Louise
PRACTITIONER BASED INQUIRY: TAKING THE CASE OF HOMEOPATHY JULIET LOUISE SMITH A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Bournemouth University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Bournemouth University January 2012 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. ABSTRACT JULIET L SMITH PRACTITIONER BASED INQUIRY: TAKING THE CASE OF HOMEOPATHY After twenty years of practising and teaching homeopathy, I am concerned that research into treatment by professional homeopaths has become stifled by evidence based medicine discourse. Homeopathy’s distinguishing features are obscured by erroneous assumptions that a homeopathic prescription is subject to the same biochemical pathways as pharmacological medication. Homeopaths are urged by external parties to ‘prove homeopathy works’ on biomedical terms. This reflexive inquiry is an attempt to redress the balance. From postmodern and pragmatic perspectives I reflexively engage with professional experiences (Smith, 2009) as a means of articulating practitioner based knowledge (Freshwater and Rolfe, 2001, Rolfe et al., 2001). The subjectivity of the practitioner researcher is transformed from a research problem into an opportunity to critically examine practitioner experience (Lees and Freshwater, 2008). The research process is a focus for the inquiry itself, with the intention of creating an open text that invites participation from the reader (Denzin and Lincoln, 1994). I ‘take the case’ of my own practice and its wider context, and enact a synergy of homeopathic practice and research methodologies. -
GO FIGURE: MAKING the ECONOMIC CASE for HOMEOPATHY Report Prepared for the Faculty of Homeopathy
GO FIGURE: MAKING THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR HOMEOPATHY Report prepared for the Faculty of Homeopathy Final Report November 2016 Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Homeopathy in perspective ................................................................................................................... 3 What is Homeopathy? .................................................................................................................... 3 Regulation of Homeopathy ............................................................................................................. 4 Current position on funding in the NHS .......................................................................................... 4 Homeopathy and the House of Commons Science and Technology Inquiry ....................................... 5 Summary of the case made to the Committee for and against Homeopathy ................................ 6 Factors underlying the Committee’s conclusions ........................................................................... 7 Evidence of economic benefits and the role of NICE ...................................................................... 8 The Government Response to the Committee .............................................................................. -
James Tyler Kent Repertory of the Homeopathic Materia Medica
James Tyler Kent Repertory of the Homeopathic Materia Medica Reading excerpt Repertory of the Homeopathic Materia Medica of James Tyler Kent Publisher: Narayana Verlag http://www.narayana-verlag.com/b9575 In the Narayana webshop you can find all english books on homeopathy, alternative medicine and a healthy life. Copyright: Narayana Verlag GmbH, Blumenplatz 2, D-79400 Kandern, Germany Tel. +49 7626 9749 700 Email [email protected] http://www.narayana-verlag.com Narayana Verlag is a publishing company for books on homeopathy, alternative medicine and a healthy life. We publish books of top-class and innovative authors like Rosina Sonnenschmidt, Rajan Sankaran, George Vithoulkas, Douglas M. Borland, Jan Scholten, Frans Kusse, Massimo Mangialavori, Kate Birch, Vaikunthanath Das Kaviraj, Sandra Perko, Ulrich Welte, Patricia Le Roux, Samuel Hahnemann, Mohinder Singh Jus, Dinesh Chauhan. Narayana Verlag organises Homeopathy Seminars. Worldwide known speakers like Rosina Sonnenschmidt, Massimo Mangialavori, Jan Scholten, Rajan Sankaran & Louis Klein inspire up to 300 participants. Contents Publishers’ Foreword. vii Preface to the 1st Edition by James Tyler Kent . ix Use of the Repertory by Glen Irving Bidwell with an Introduction by J. T. Kent . xi Repertory Mind. .1 Kidneys. .757 Vertigo . .107 Prostate Gland . .763 Head . .119 Urethra . .765 Eye . .273 Urine . .779 Vision . .313 Genitalia - Male . .793 Ear . .329 Genitalia - Female . .817 Hearing. .369 Larynx and Trachea . .851 Nose . .373 Respiration . .869 Face . .407 Cough. .885 Mouth. .457 Expectoration . .921 Teeth. .495 Chest . .931 Throat. .515 Back . .999 External Throat. .541 Extremities . .1079 Stomach . .547 Sleep. .1395 Abdomen . .619 Chill . .1423 Rectum . .693 Fever . .1443 Stool . .727 Perspiration . -
A Day in the Life
NEWS FEATURE A day in the life Landmark conference ‘New Horizons in Water Science: Evidence for Homeopathy?’ (with apologies to J Lennon & P McCartney) by Lionel Milgrom PhD MARH RHom and Dana Ullman MPH CCH Foreword Some people not only have good ideas, but are also prepared to work hard to bring those ideas into fruition. Ken (or Lord Aaron Kenneth Ward Atherton, to give him his proper title) is one such person. He decided that we all needed a strong antidote to the ‘no evidence’ claims so frequently vaunted by the anti-homeopathy campaigners, and he organised a truly unforgettable one-day event (held at the Royal Society of Medicine, London), to remind us that Lionel (LRM) has been a homeopath for ‘proper’ science can be fascinating, inspiring and truly uplifting. over 20 years, training at the now defunct Ken’s impressive line-up of presenters were all internationally re- London College of Homeopathy, and the nowned scientists, including two Nobel laureates, and the theme Orion course in advanced homeopathy. He of the event was to explore the science underpinning our knowledge works from home now but has laboured of water structures. I came away from the day feeling really positive; at Nelsons, Ainsworths, and an integrated our emerging understanding of the science of water structures may dental practice in London’s West End. He is well lead us to eventually being able to explain how homeopathy also a scientist (chemist; co-founding an can work at a purely energetic level. On behalf of Team ARH and anticancer biotech spinout company), the rest of the homeopathy community, I would like to thank Ken a science writer, and in his latest incarna- for having the determination, perseverance and, above all, the vision tion, a chemistry teacher. -
Homeopathic Pharmacy (Second Edition): Theory and Practice
An imprint of Elsevier Limited © Pearson Professional Limited 1997 © 2006, Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved The right of Steven B. Kayne to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Health Sciences Rights Department, 1600 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 1800, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2899, USA: phone: (+1) 215 239 3804; fax: (+1) 215 239 3805; or, e-mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://www.elsevier.com), by selecting ‘Support and contact’ and then ‘Copyright and Permission’. First edition 1997 Second edition 2006 ISBN 0 443 10160 4 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Note Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our knowledge, changes in practice, treatment and drug therapy may become necessary or appropriate. Readers are advised to check the most current information provided (i) on procedures featured or (ii) by the manufacturer of each product to be administered, to verify the recommended dose or formula, the method and duration of administration, and contraindications. -
Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy Fourth Report of Session 2009–10 HC 45 House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy Fourth Report of Session 2009–10 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 8 February 2010 HC 45 Published on 22 February 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Government Office for Science. Under arrangements agreed by the House on 25 June 2009 the Science and Technology Committee was established on 1 October 2009 with the same membership and Chairman as the former Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee and its proceedings were deemed to have been in respect of the Science and Technology Committee. Current membership Mr Phil Willis (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chairman) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Tim Boswell (Conservative, Daventry) Mr Ian Cawsey (Labour, Brigg & Goole) Mrs Nadine Dorries (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Dr Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon (Labour, Bolton South East) Mr Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) Dr Doug Naysmith (Labour, Bristol North West) Dr Bob Spink (Independent, Castle Point) Ian Stewart (Labour, Eccles) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Mr Rob Wilson (Conservative, Reading East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152.