DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing Georgia's Migration Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Developing Georgia's Migration Policy 1 DEVELOPING GEORGIA’S MIGRATION POLICY: LESSONS FROM POLAND Tbilisi, December 2011 2 Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development/CIPDD European and Euro-Atlantic Cooperation Program The publication was prepared under the Improving Mechanisms of Migration Control and Coordination of Migration Policy in Georgia by Reference to the Polish Experi- ence project The project was co-financed by the Polish Development Cooperation Programme 2011 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland The views expressed in this publication are exclusively those of the authors and are not meant to represent the official position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland Project coordinator: Justyna Frelak Proofreader: George Lisowski, Marcin Grabski Editor: Piotr Kamierkiewicz The publication is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Poland Certain rights are reserved to the authors and the Institute of Public Affairs. The publication was prepared under the Polish Development Cooperation Programme 2011 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland. Any use of the pub- lication is permitted on condition that the above mentioned information (on the licence used, the holders of rights and the Polish Development Cooperation Programme) is included. ISBN 978-99928-37-35-1 Published by Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development 72 Tsereteli Avenue, 0154 Tbilisi Georgia 3 Table of contents Preface by Ghia Nodia ..................................................................................5 Introduction by Piotr Kamierkiewicz .......................................................... 9 The Relevance of Polish Experience in Migration Policy Development for Eastern Partners by Piotr Kamierkiewicz .................. 11 The Development of Migration Policy in Georgia by Tamara Pataraia ..... 35 Recommendations: How to Improve Migration Management in Georgia by Tamara Pataraia and Piotr Kamierkiewicz .................. 74 Notes about the Authors ............................................................................... 79 4 5 Ghia Nodia Applying Polish experience to the development of migration policy in Georgia In the 21st century, the development of an appropriate migration policy is an increasingly important issue for every country. In the last twenty years, due to political turmoil and economic shortages, a large chunk of Georgias population has left for other countries, temporarily or for good. On the other hand, as Georgias situation improves, it is gradually becom- ing an attractive destination for migrants from countries to the east and south. In Georgias case, the imperative to develop a comprehensive migra- tion policy is strengthened by its closer relations with the European Union. Relations with the EU have intensified since Georgia joined the European Neighborhood Policy in 2004, and became a member of the EU Eastern Partnership (EaP) in 2009. In this context, in summer 2010, negotiations on an Association Agreement between Georgia and EU were launched. Liberalization of the visa regime for Georgians who want to travel to countries of the EU is one of the most important benefits Georgia seeks from its closer ties with Europe. However, this requires harmonization of Georgias migration policies with European regulations and practices. Hence, when we talk about the development of migration policy in Georgia, this is usually in the context of relations with the European Union. In 2010, Georgia established a Governmental Commission on Migra- tion; in recent years, it has introduced a number of legislative changes and effective reforms in relevant government agencies for improving migration management and control. This illustrates that the Georgian government takes these issues seriously. In response, Schengen countries have already eased visa regulations for some categories of Georgian citizens. However, these are only first steps: Georgias ambition is to achieve much more. This also requires further progress in developing Georgias institutions and practices. 6 Ghia Nodia Georgias rapprochement with Europe is greatly helped by a group of countries that are supportive of Georgias ambitions, largely due to a sense of solidarity stemming from commonalities in their historical experience. Poland with its growing economic and political weight within the European Union is an especially important friend and ally. While greatly appreciating its political support, Georgia also hopes to benefit from studying Polands experience. Unlike Poland ten years ago, todays Georgia has no clear prospect of membership in the European Union though this is what it ultimately aspires to. At the same time, Poland is an appropriate role model for Georgia, being a formerly Communist country that has success- fully harmonized its state institutions and practices with the EU in the quite recent past. This has not been an easy process but the country has done its job well as it is now a successful member of the Union. Reforms necessary for drawing closer to the EU are somewhat con- troversial in Georgia as well. Having prioritized fast economic growth, Georgia has introduced rather liberal economic policies, and this includes fairly open attitudes to migration. Harmonization with European practices, however, requires greater regulation, which tends to be contrary to the instincts of some Georgian policymakers. Still, the imperative of Europe- anization is much stronger than those reservations hence the consider- able progress that has been achieved in relations between Georgia and Europe so far. Not long ago, similar political dilemmas existed in the case of Poland. Some Poles were concerned that stricter controls on the eastern border of the country would harm the economy in neighboring areas. These concerns were fully rational, but Poland managed to overcome the difficulties. Apart from political problems, there are also lots of technicalities that may seem boring, but if they are not taken care of, may be an obstacle to the success of reforms. Strengthening administrative capacity is an impor- tant component of Europeanization as well. Direct relations with Polish agencies that have gone through drastic reforms relatively recently but have now become a successful part of the European system are extremely useful for their Georgian counterparts. This is what the joint project between the Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development (CIPDD), and its Polish partner the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) has been about. These two indepen- dent think tanks took the initiative to facilitate cooperation between state agencies of the two countries aimed at speeding up progress in harmo- nization of Georgian migration policies and practices with those of Eu- ropean countries. While the project had a practical component of en- Preface 7 couraging actual learning experience through direct contacts between Georgian and Polish civil servants, this publication also includes policy studies, written from Georgian and Polish perspectives. These studies sum up the current state of affairs in the development of Georgias migration policies and practices, discuss Polish experience in this area and its relevance for Georgia, and make specific policy recommenda- tions addressed to appropriate actors. In taking this initiative, CIPDD and IPA wanted to serve as partners of government agencies, but also to directly serve their societies to make people better informed on the important issues of Georgian reforms in a vitally important area, and on Georgian-Polish cooperation in this area. We hope that through our efforts we have made a valuable if modest contri- bution but this is for others to judge. In any case, we want to extend our appreciation to the Polish Foreign Ministry, whose generous support made this project possible. Ghia Nodia Chairman Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development/CIPDD December 2011 8 9 Piotr Kamierkiewicz Introduction This publication is a collection of findings and recommendations, drawn up under the Improving mechanisms of migration control and coordination of migration policy in Georgia by reference to the Polish experience project, financed by the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as part of the 2011 PolishAid program. The project targeted officials of key Georgian institutions working to implement the countrys international commitments (in particular, the readmission and visa facilitation agreement) and to de- velop national policy in the field of migration. Between March and De- cember 2011, the project helped identify areas where legal and institu- tional reforms are needed as well as those aspects of migration control that could benefit from Polish experience. The assessment of the Georgian institutions needs was carried out through a combination of an analysis done by a team comprising a Geor- gian and Polish expert and a series of consultations with officials and representatives of non-governmental and international organizations. Atten- tion was paid at all stages of the project to ensuring that the Georgian officials had an opportunity to raise questions of key relevance to the execution of national reforms. Preliminary answers were provided through presentations made by institutions at project seminars, comments to expert assessments and also active participation in a study visit to Poland in September 2011. The study visit helped provide the officials with relevant experience of Polish institutions in developing capacity for effective mi-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Borderization in Georgia: Sovereignty Materialized
    Borderization in Georgia: Sovereignty Materialized Edward Boyle∗ Abstract This paper shall examine the process of borderization that has been proclaimed as occurring along the Georgian-South Ossetian boundary. This boundary is one that remains largely unrecognized, as the claims of the Georgian state to sovereignty over South Ossetia are accepted by the majority of the international community. The crucial exception to this is Russia, under whose aegis this process of borderization is occurring. The result is the creation of a physical barrier around the territory of South Ossetia, one that seeks to materialize what was previously an administrative fiction on the ground, halting the movement of people and goods across this border and dividing people from their livelihoods. The paper shall consider what meaning this fencing has within the context of Georgia’s borders, and reflect upon the larger lessons that can be drawn for the concept of sovereignty and the status of borders in the contemporary world. Reporting the Border On April 15, 2014, three crew members of a Tbilisi-based television station were detained by Russian forces close to the village of Adzvi bordering South Ossetia. TV3 announced that its reporter Bela Zakaidze, cameraman Vakhtang Lekiashvili and broadcast technician Mikheil Mikhoev had been detained while working on a report about the shifting of the boundary between South Ossetia and Georgia deeper into Georgian-controlled territory. RES, South Ossetia’s official news agency, citing the South Ossetian Special Envoy for Post-Conflict Issues, Murat Jioev, reported that “three Georgian citizens were detained in the vicinity of South Ossetia … for violating the state border.” 1 Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement that Russian border guards, protecting the boundary between Georgia and South Ossetia as per the agreement between the governments of Russia and South Ossetia, had arrested three Georgian journalists and that, “According to the rules the detainees were transferred to the South Ossetian authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, Georgia and the Eu in Abkhazia and South Ossetia
    PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova August 2012 Figueroa Press Los Angeles The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and cannot be interpreted to reflect the positions of organizations that the author is affiliated with. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstore Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book. Figueroa Press and the USC Bookstore are trademarks of the University of Southern California ISBN 13: 978-0-18-214016-9 ISBN 10: 0-18-214016-4 For general inquiries or to request additional copies of this paper please contact: USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School University of Southern California 3502 Watt Way, G4 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0281 Tel: (213) 821-2078; Fax: (213) 821-0774 [email protected] www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy CPD Perspectives is a periodic publication by the USC Center on Public Diplomacy, and highlights scholarship intended to stimulate critical thinking about the study and practice of public diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Re-Opening by Country
    Europe Re-Opening by Country Overview As European countries re-open, Schengen Area countries have mostly excluded U.S. travelers from entry, with some exceptions (see previous OSAC reporting). While each European country periodically reviews the list of “safe countries,” there is no indication if/when U.S. travelers will be able to conduct normal travel to these locations. The EU reported that its criteria relate to the epidemiological situation and containment measures, including physical distancing, as well as economic and social considerations in each country, applied cumulatively. Countries should meet the following criteria in particular: • Close to or below the EU 14-day average, as it stands on June 14, of the rate of new COVID-19 cases; • The trend of new cases over the same period in comparison to the previous 14 days is stable or decreasing; and • The overall response to COVID-19, taking into account available information on aspects such as testing, surveillance, contact tracing, containment, treatment, and reporting, as well as the reliability of available information and data sources; and if needed, the total average International Health Regulations (IHR) score across all dimensions. Those travelers who do not fit into an exemption category – most potential travelers from the United States are subject to restrictions – must wait for the EU to issue a new list, based on the criteria above, to enter one of the 27 EU member states. Private-sector security managers should remember that this restriction does not affect travel to the United Kingdom. Europe Re-Openings Each U.S. Embassy continues to update its COVID-19 information page for the latest entry/exit, testing, and quarantine requirements, where applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Espionage Against Poland in the Documents and Analyses of the Polish Special Services (1944–1989) – As Illustrated by the Intelligence Activities of the USA
    DOI 10.14746/ssp.2016.1.8 Remigiusz ROSICKI Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Espionage against Poland in the Documents and Analyses of the Polish Special Services (1944–1989) – as Illustrated by the Intelligence Activities of the USA Abstract: The text is treats of the espionage against Poland in the period 1944–1989. The above analysis has been supplemented with the quantitative data from the period 1944–1984 as regards those convicted for participating in, acting for, and passing on information to the foreign intelligence agencies. The espionage issues were presented on the example of the American intelligence activity, which was illustrated by the cases of persons who were convicted for espionage. While examining the research thesis, the author used the documents and analyses prepared by the Ministry of In- ternal Affairs, which were in its major part addressed to the Security Service and the Citizens’ Militia officers. The author made an attempt at the verification of the fol- lowing research hypotheses: (1) To what extent did the character of the socio-political system influence the number of persons convicted for espionage against Poland in the period under examination (1944–1989)?; (2) What was the level of foreign intel- ligence services’ interest in Poland before the year 1990?; (3) Is it possible to indicate the specificity of the U.S. intelligence activity against Poland? Key words: espionage, U.S. espionage, intelligence activities, counterespionage, Polish counterintelligence, special services, state security Introduction he aim of this text is to present the level of knowledge among the au- Tthorities responsible for the state security and public order about the intelligence activities conducted against Poland in the period 1944–1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity Games and Policy Tools in Eastern Partnership Countries Andrey Makarychev
    Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity games and policy tools in Eastern Partnership countries Andrey Makarychev No 2018/02, February 2018 Abstract This paper applies the concepts of hegemony and hybridity as analytical tools to help understand the structural changes taking place within the Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries and beyond. The author points to the split identities of many post-Soviet societies and the growing appeal of solutions aimed at balancing Russia’s or the EU’s dominance as important factors shaping EaP dynamics. Against this background, he explores how the post-Soviet borderlands can find their place in a still hypothetical pan-European space, and free themselves from the tensions of their competing hegemons. The EaP is divided into those countries that signed Association Agreements with the EU and those preferring to maintain their loyalty to Eurasian integration. Bringing the two groups closer together, however, is not beyond policy imagination. The policy-oriented part of this analysis focuses on a set of ideas and schemes aimed at enhancing interaction and blurring divisions between these countries. The author proposes five scenarios that might shape the future of EaP countries’ relations with the EU and with Russia: 1) the conflictual status quo in which both hegemonic powers will seek to weaken the position of the other; 2) trilateralism (EU, Russia plus an EaP country), which has been tried and failed, but still is considered as a possible option by some policy analysts; 3) the Kazakhstan-Armenia model of diplomatic advancement towards the EU, with some potential leverage on Russia; 4) deeper engagement by the EU with the Eurasian Economic Union, which has some competences for tariffs and technical standards; and 5) the decoupling of security policies from economic projects, which is so far the most difficult option to foresee and implement in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • MARITIME SECURITY SPECIAL THEMATIC REPORT April 2012 DEPARTMENT of STATE OFFICE of the COORDINATOR of U.S
    MARITIME SECURITY SPECIAL THEMATIC REPORT April 2012 DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE COORDINATOR OF U.S. ASSISTANCE TO EUROPE AND EURASIA (EUR/ACE) MONITORING USG ASSISTANCE PROGRAM RESULTS IN GEORGIA (GEORGIA MONITORING PROJECT) CONTRACT NUMBER: GS10F0309P GEORGIA MONITORING PROJECT MARITIME SECURITY SPECIAL THEMATIC REPORT APRIL 2012 DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE COORDINATOR OF U.S. ASSISTANCE TO EUROPE AND EURASIA (EUR/ACE) MONITORING U.S. GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM RESULTS IN GEORGIA (GEORGIA MONITORING PROJECT) CONTRACT NUMBER: GS10F0309P Submitted to: United States Department of State Mary E. Stewart Office of the Coordinator of U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia 2201 C Street, NW, Room 4227 Washington, D.C.20520 Email: [email protected] Submitted by: International Business & Technical Consultants, Inc. (IBTCI) 8618 Westwood Center Drive Suite 220• Vienna, VA • 22182 Telephone: (703) 749-0100• Facsimile: (703) 749-0110 Email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 1 II. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 3 III. U.S. FOREIGN POLICY INTEREST ................................................................................................ 4 IV. COUNTRY CONTEXT .................................................................................................................. 5 V. U.S. BORDER SECURITY
    [Show full text]
  • The Anguish of Repatriation. Immigration to Poland And
    EEPXXX10.1177/0888325414532494East European Politics and SocietiesGrzymała-Kazłowska and Grzymała-Moszczyńska 532494research-article2014 East European Politics and Societies and Cultures Volume XX Number X Month 201X 1 –21 © 2014 SAGE Publications The Anguish of Repatriation: 10.1177/0888325414532494 http://eeps.sagepub.com hosted at Immigration to Poland and Integration http://online.sagepub.com of Polish Descendants from Kazakhstan Aleksandra Grzymała-Kazłowska University of Warsaw Halina Grzymała-Moszczyńska Jagiellonian University Repatriation remains an unsolved problem of Polish migration policy. To date, it has taken place on a small scale, mostly outside of the state’s repatriation system. Thousands of people with a promised repatriation visa are still waiting to be repatri- ated. The majority of the repatriates come from Kazakhstan, home to the largest popu- lation of descendants of Poles in the Asian part of the former USSR. They come to Poland not only for sentimental reasons, but also in search of better living conditions. However, repatriates—in particular older ones—experience a number of problems with adaptation in Poland, dominated by financial and housing-related issues. A further source of difficulties for repatriates, alongside their spatial dispersion, insufficient lin- guistic and cultural competencies, and identity problems, is finding a place on and adapting to the Polish labor market. Despite their difficult situation and special needs, the repatriates in Poland are not sufficiently supported due to the inefficiency of admin- istration and non-governmental institutions dealing with the task of repatriates’ integration. It results in the anguish of repatriation. Keywords: repatriation; repatriates from Kazakhstan; Polish integration policy; immigration to Poland; Polish minority in the former USSR Introduction Over two decades after the beginning of the transformation of the political and economic system in Poland, repatriation remains an unresolved issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for UN General Assembly Resolution 72/42 on Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
    State Security Service of Georgia Information for UN General Assembly Resolution 72/42 on Measures to prevent terrorists from acquiring weapons of mass destruction 1. International Legal Instruments on Terrorism, to which Georgia is a Party a) Universal Conventions Georgia is a party to the following fourteen (14) UN anti-terrorism conventions: 1. Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft, signed at Tokyo on 14 September 1963 (Tokyo Convention) - in force for Georgia since September 14, 1994; 2. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft, signed at The Hague on 16 December 1970 (The Hague Convention) - in force for Georgia since April 20, 1994; 3. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, concluded at Montreal on 23 September 1971 (Montreal Convention) - in force for Georgia since April 20, 1994; 4. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, adopted in New York on 14 December 1973 - in force for Georgia since February 18, 2004; 5. International Convention against the Taking of Hostages, adopted in New York on 17 December 1979 - in force for Georgia since February 18, 2004; 6. Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, adopted at Vienna on 3 March 1980 - in force for Georgia since October 7, 2006; 7. Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil Aviation, supplementary to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, signed at Montreal on 24 February 1988 - in force for Georgia since March 17, 1999; 8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Belarusians Acquiring Karta Polaka
    ETHNIC IDENTIFICATION IN THE CONTEXT OF AN ALTERNATIVE STATE MEMBERSHIP REGIME: THE CASE OF BELARUSIANS ACQUIRING KARTA POLAKA By Volha Biziukova Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology. In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisors: professor Dan Rabinowitz professor Ayşe Çağlar CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 Abstract This thesis deals with the ethnic identification of Belarusian citizens who applied for the Karta Polaka (The Pole’s Card), a type of alternative state membership regime introduced by Poland. The membership in two countries conditions a specific situation for ethnic identification. In the present research I consider the biographic dynamics of ethnic identification in connection with the cultural practices and family stories, the trajectories of identification and the construction of the categories of affiliation. The analysis is made on the basis of the in-depth interviews with the applicants for the Karta Polaka. The process of identification is contextualized in a broader structural and historical context. The narrative of the Karta Polaka affects the way the applicants assign themselves and their ancestors to the ethnic categories due to the introduction of bureaucratic discourse. The cultural practices changed dramatically through generations and at present moment cultural traits are not the strict criteria for the attribution to an ethnic category. The applicants affiliate themselves with several communities simultaneously but describe theirs ways of belonging using different tropes. The applicants follow multiple routes in their identification conditioned by the common structural and historical context along with individual biographical stories. The identification and the status of the Karta Polaka holders are characterized with exclusive and inclusive tendencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of the Special Services in Poland in the Context of Political Changes
    Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces ISSN:2544-7122(print),2545-0719(online) 2020,Volume52,Number3(197),Pages557-573 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0014.3926 Original article Transformation of the special services in Poland in the context of political changes Marian Kopczewski1* , Zbigniew Ciekanowski2 , Anna Piotrowska3 1 FacultyofSecuritySciences, GeneralTadeuszKościuszkoMilitaryUniversityofLandForces,Wrocław,Poland, e-mail:[email protected] 2 FacultyofEconomicandTechnicalSciences, PopeJohnPaulIIStateSchoolofHigherEducationinBiałaPodlaska,Poland, e-mail:[email protected] 3 FacultyofNationalSecurity,WarStudiesUniversity,Warsaw,Poland, e-mail:[email protected] INFORMATION ABSTRACT Article history: ThearticlepresentsthetransformationofspecialservicesinPolandagainst Submited:16August2019 thebackgroundofpoliticalchanges.Itpresentstheactivitiesofsecuritybod- Accepted:19May2020 ies–civilandmilitaryintelligenceandcounterintelligenceduringthecommu- Published:15September2020 nistera.Theirtaskwastostrengthencommunistpower,eliminateopponents ofthesystem,strengthentheallianceofsocialistcountriesledbytheUSSR, andfightagainstdemocraticopposition.Thecreationofnewspecialservices wasalsoshown:theUOPandtheWSI.Thefocuswasonthenewtasksthat weresetfortheminconnectionwiththedemocraticchangesandnewalli- ances.TherewerepresentedspectacularUOPactions,whichcontributedto raisingtheprestigeofPolandontheinternationalarena. KEYWORDS *Correspondingauthor specialservices,politicalchanges,democracy,security ©2020byAuthor(s).ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCreativeCommonsAttribution
    [Show full text]
  • A N N E X E S
    13255/07 Georgia v. Russia (I) A N N E X E S Annex 1 Summary of documents submitted by the applicant Government I. In their application of 27 March 2007 A. Summary of documents in English and Russian C. Summary of statements of Georgian citizens B. + D. Summary of media coverage of events II. In their observations in reply of 5 May 2008 Summary of documents in Georgian / Russian Annex 2 Summary of documents submitted by the respondent Government I. In their observations of 26 December 2007 . Summary of documents in Russian II. In their additional observations of 23 September 2008 . Summary of documents in Russian Annex 3 Report of 22 January 2007 by the monitoring committee of the Parliamentary Assembly 1 13255/07 Georgia v. Russia (I) Annex 1 I. A. Summary of the documents in English and Russian submitted by the applicant Government in their application of 27 March 2008 number Document type date 1 Summary/Translation The applicant Government submitted the Agreement between Georgia and Russia on the Terms and Rules of the temporary functioning and withdrawal of Russian Military Bases and other military facilities belonging to the Group of Russian Military Forces in Transcaucasia deployed on the Territory of Georgia. The Agreement was drawn up in Russian and Georgian and signed by both parties in Sochi, Russian Federation, on 31 March 2006. number Document type date 2 A. Council of Europe press release 6 October 2006; B. Council of the European Union press release 16-17 October 2006; C. Speech by Ms Benita Ferrero-Waldner, member 25 October 2006 of the European Commission with responsibility for and 6 March 2007 External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy D.
    [Show full text]
  • XXXIX Polish Yearbook of International Law 2019
    XXXIX POLISH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW DOI 10.24425/pyil.2020.134481 2019 PL ISSN 0554-498X Wojciech Burek* CONFORMITY OF The ACT ON The POLIsh CARD WITH INTERNATIONal law FROM The peRspecTIVE OF The CONSTITUTIONal COURT OF BelaRUS Abstract: With the Act on the Polish Card Poland followed the pattern of some European states (mostly Central and Eastern European ones) of enacting specific domestic legislation conferring special treatment and benefits to persons who are recognized as its kin-minorities. The most important analysis of this phenomenon from the perspective of international law was the 2001 Venice Commission’s report entitled “Report on the Protection of National Minorities by their Kin-State.” The Polish legislation was adopted in 2007, so for obvious reasons it was not considered by the Venice Commission. However, a rather unexpected and unusual examination of the Polish kin-state legislation from the perspective of international law came from Belarus. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Belarus (CCRB) conducted a comprehensive examination of the Act on the Polish Card in 2011. The main aim of this article is to present and comment on the reasoning of the CCRB. Beginning with the broader context, this article starts with a presentation of the origins and a short description of the Act on the Polish Card, followed by a discussion of why the Polish Card and other kin-state legislation instruments are topics of concern in international law. The main part of the article is devoted to the presentation and assessment of the 2011 CCRB decision on the Act on the Polish Card.
    [Show full text]