1 Phonesthetics and the Etymologies of Blood and Bone1 JOSEPH PENTANGELO The Graduate Center, CUNY Email:
[email protected] Web: https://jpentangelo.commons.gc.cuny.edu An updated version of this paper appears in English Language & Linguistics 25(2): 225–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674319000534 2 Phonesthetics and the Etymologies of Blood and Bone ABSTRACT The etymologies of English blood and bone are obscure. Although their cognates are well represented in the Germanic family, both lack clear cognates in other Indo-European languages. Various explanations of their origins have been proposed, including that they may be non-Indo-European (e.g. Hawkins 1987). Blood and bone, and their cognates, share an initial /b/ with numerous body- related words (e.g. beard, breast, bosom) throughout Germanic. This initial /b/ constitutes a phonestheme. Phonesthemes — ‘recurring sound-meaning pairings that are not clearly contrastive morphemes’ (Bergen 2004: 290) — are present in many Germanic languages, but their role in lexicogenesis is little understood. I suggest that blood and bone were formed by blending the initial /b/ phonestheme with two preexisting lexemes: PGmc.*flōda- ‘something that flows’ and *staina- ‘stone.’ Phonesthetic blending may also be the method by which English dog was coined (Gąsiorowski 2006), and may be a fruitful avenue for future etymological research. 3 1 INTRODUCTION The etymologies of two common Germanic words, English blood and bone, are marked by their obscurity. Although their cognates are well represented within the Germanic family, both lack clear cognates in other Indo-European languages. Various explanations of their origins have been put forward, including the claim that neither is Indo-European (Hawkins 1987).