Water Quality Technical Report for the Murrumbidgee Surface Water Resource Plan Area (SW9)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Quality Technical Report for the Murrumbidgee Surface Water Resource Plan Area (SW9) THE BASIN PLAN Water quality technical report for the Murrumbidgee surface water resource plan area (SW9) NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment | dpie.nsw.gov.au Published by NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment dpie.nsw.gov.au Title: Water quality technical report for the Murrumbidgee surface water resource plan area (SW9) First published: February 2020 Department reference number: INT18/90082 Acknowledgments The soils maps in this report contain data sourced from the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage. © State of New South Wales through Department of Planning, Industry and Environment [2020]. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment as the owner. However, you must obtain permission if you wish to charge others for access to the publication (other than at cost); include the publication in advertising or a product for sale; modify the publication; or republish the publication on a website. You may freely link to the publication on a departmental website. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (October 2018) and may not be accurate, current or complete. The State of New South Wales (including the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment), the author and the publisher take no responsibility, and will accept no liability, for the accuracy, currency, reliability or correctness of any information included in the document (including material provided by third parties). Readers should make their own inquiries and rely on their own advice when making decisions related to material contained in this publication. Water quality technical report for the Murrumbidgee surface w ater resource plan area (SW9) Summary Good quality water protects public health, supports economic production and maintains a healthy river ecosystem. Water quality is mostly determined by land use, geology, climate, riparian vegetation and stream flow, and reflects the interactions of natural and man-made practices that occur in a drainage area and the riparian zone. Degradation of water quality can put stress on a range of aquatic organisms, impinge on Aboriginal cultural and spiritual uses of water, increase the cost of drinking water treatment, contribute to public health risks and decreases the suitability of water for irrigation and agriculture. Alteration of the Australian landscape since European settlement has resulted in marked changes in catchment conditions. Runoff from cropping areas, erosion of soil and nutrients from stream banks and discharge from saline areas have led to increased turbidity, salinity, sedimentation, nutrient loads and chemical residues. These in turn can degrade aquatic ecosystem health. The regulation of rivers through the construction of large storages and weirs lead to changes to flow regimes, thermal pollution, harmful algal blooms and disruption of longitudinal connectivity of river processes. Water quality condition in the Murrumbidgee water resource planning area (WRPA) varies from poor to excellent. Water quality issues occurring within the catchment are the result of a combination of factors. These include alteration to natural flow regimes, in particular disruption by Burrinjuck and Blowering Dams, changes to catchment conditions and land use change. Table 1 summarises the major water quality issues in the Murrumbidgee WRPA. Table 1: Summary of major issues and causes of water quality degradation Issue Location Potential causes Harmful algal uplands, Reduced flow, stratification and warm water temperatures in Burrinjuck Dam, blooms midlands, lowland weirs and recreational lakes. Nutrient inputs. lowlands Dissolved uplands, Reduced flow, and increased low flow and cease to flow periods disrupting oxygen outside midlands, dissolved oxygen dynamics and increasing eutrophication. Hypoxic blackwater of normal lowlands events following large scale flooding and inundation of floodplains. ranges Increased uplands, Stream bank and riparian condition, grazing and cropping practices, carp and nutrients and midlands, feral species. In the midlands, increased sediment and nutrient input turbidity lowlands associated with erosion. Toxicants and midlands, Pesticide use in cropping areas. pesticides lowlands Disruption to midlands, Reduced freshes and high flows, disruption of longitudinal connectivity by organic carbon lowlands Blowering and Burrinjuck Dams. cycling Thermal midlands Cold water released from Blowering and Burrinjuck Dams in summer. Warm pollution water releases in winter. NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment | INT18/90082 | i Water quality technical report for the Murrumbidgee surface w ater resource plan area (SW9) Contents Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... i Contents ...................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables............................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. v 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Purpose..........................................................................................................................................1 1.2. Context...........................................................................................................................................2 1.3. Catchment description ....................................................................................................................3 1.4. Water quality targets .......................................................................................................................4 1.4.1. Assessment using Basin Plan water quality targets ...................................................................4 1.4.2. Water quality targets for water-dependent ecosystems ..............................................................4 1.4.3. Water quality targets for raw water for treatment for human consumption ...................................5 1.4.4. Water quality targets for irrigation water ....................................................................................6 1.4.5. Water quality targets for recreational water ...............................................................................6 1.4.6. Salinity targets for long-term salinity planning and management.................................................7 2. Water quality parameters .......................................................................................................................9 2.1. Turbidity and suspended sediment ..................................................................................................9 2.2. Nutrients ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3. Dissolved oxygen .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.4. pH ................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.5. Water temperature and thermal pollution ....................................................................................... 12 2.6. Salinity ......................................................................................................................................... 12 2.7. Harmful algal blooms .................................................................................................................... 13 2.8. Toxicants ...................................................................................................................................... 14 2.9. Pathogens .................................................................................................................................... 15 3. Water access rules and flow management in the Murrumbidgee WRPA................................................. 15 4. Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 17 4.1. Site selection and monitoring ......................................................................................................... 17 4.2. Water quality index (WaQI) ........................................................................................................... 20 4.3. Catchment stressor identification ................................................................................................... 20 4.3.1. Conceptual mapping .............................................................................................................. 21 4.3.2. Literature review .................................................................................................................... 21 4.3.3. Summary statistics ................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • ACT Water Quality Report 1997-98
    ACT Water Quality Report 1997-98 Environment ACT i ACT Water Quality Report 1997 - 98 Further Information: Raw data for all of the sites reported are available on the Internet under the ACT Government web site at www.act.gov.au/Water_Quality/start.cfm Should you wish to seek further information in relation to this report, please contact: Greg Keen Water Unit Environment ACT Telephone: 6207 2350 Facsimile: 6207 6084 E-mail: [email protected] ii Environment ACT ACT Water Quality Report 1997-98 Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................iv List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................iv Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................2 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................2 Scope ...........................................................................................................................................................2 Landuse.......................................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • SURVEY of VEGETATION and HABITAT in KEY RIPARIAN ZONES of TRIBUTARIES of the MURRUMBIDGEE RIVER in the ACT: Naas, Gudgenby, Paddys, Cotter and Molonglo Rivers
    SURVEY OF VEGETATION AND HABITAT IN KEY RIPARIAN ZONES OF TRIBUTARIES OF THE MURRUMBIDGEE RIVER IN THE ACT: Naas, Gudgenby, Paddys, Cotter and Molonglo Rivers Lesley Peden, Stephen Skinner, Luke Johnston, Kevin Frawley, Felicity Grant and Lisa Evans Technical Report 23 November 2011 Conservation Planning and Research | Policy Division | Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate TECHNICAL REPORT 23 Survey of Vegetation and Habitat in Key Riparian Zones of Tributaries of the Murrumbidgee River in the ACT: Naas, Gudgenby, Paddys, Cotter and Molonglo Rivers Lesley Peden, Stephen Skinner, Luke Johnston, Kevin Frawley, Felicity Grant and Lisa Evans Conservation, Planning and Research Policy Division Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate GPO Box 158, CANBERRA ACT 2601 i Front cover: The Murrumbidgee River and environs near Tharwa Sandwash recreation area, Tharwa, ACT. Photographs: Luke Johnston, Lesley Peden and Mark Jekabsons. ISBN: 978‐0‐9806848‐7‐2 © Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate, Canberra, 2011 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to appropriate referencing of the source. This document should be cited as: Peden, L., Skinner, S., Johnston, L., Frawley, K., Grant, F., and Evans, L. 2011. Survey of Vegetation and Habitat in Key Riparian Zones in Tributaries of the Murrumbidgee River in the ACT: Cotter, Molonglo, Gudgenby, Naas and Paddys Rivers. Technical Report 23. Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate, Canberra. Published by Conservation Planning and Research, Policy Division, Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate. http://www.environment.act.gov.au | Telephone: Canberra Connect 132 281 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Fire by Aboriginal People Results of Member Survey NPA BULLETIN Volume 33 Number 3 September 1996
    Use of fire by Aboriginal people Results of member survey NPA BULLETIN Volume 33 number 3 September 1996 CONTENTS NPA responds to Boboyan rehabilitation .. 6 Use of fire by Aboriginal people 18 Eleanor Stodart John Carnahan Canberra Nature Park 8 Rabbit calicivirus update 21 Reg Alder Len Haskew Don't you worry about that! 22 Parkwatch 12 Len Haskew Compiled by Len Haskew Orroral Homestead 14 Cover photo Reg Alder Stephen Johnston points to Urambi trig, 15 km distant, on his walk from Mt Stramlo. The Murrumbidgee River A burning issue - a response 16 and the Bullen Range are in the middle distance. Photo Stephen Johnston by Reg Alder. National Parks Association (ACT) Subscription rates (1 July to 30 June) Household members $25 Single members $20 Incorporated Corporate members $15 Bulletin only $15 Inaugurated 1960 Concession $10 For new subscriptions joining between: Aims and objectives of the Association 1 January and 31 March—half specified rate • Promotion of national parks and of measures for the pro­ 1 April and 30 June—annual subscription tection of fauna and flora, scenery, natural features and cultural heritage in the Australian Capital Territory and Membership inquiries welcome elsewhere, and the reservation of specific areas. Please phone the NPA office. • Interest in the provision of appropriate outdoor recreation areas. The NPA (ACT) office is located in Maclaurin Cres, • Stimulation of interest in, and appreciation and enjoyment Chifley. Office hours are: of, such natural phenomena and cultural heritage by or­ 10am to 2pm Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays ganised field outings, meetings or any other means. Telephone/Fax: (06) 282 5813 • Cooperation with organisations and persons having simi­ Address: PO Box 1940, Woden ACT 2606 lar interests and objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW of the ACT WATER RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES 2013 November 2017 Final Report to Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate
    REVIEW OF THE ACT WATER RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES 2013 November 2017 Final Report to Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate. APPLIEDECOLOGY.EDU.AU ACT ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES: REVIEW Prepared for: Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government Produced by: Institute for Applied Ecology appliedecology.edu.au University of Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6201 2795 Facsimile: (02) 6201 5651 Authors: Dr. Adrian Dusting, Mr. Ben Broadhurst, Dr. Sue Nichols, Dr. Fiona Dyer This report should be cited as: Dusting,A., Broadhurst, B., Nichols, S. and Dyer, F. (2017) Review of the ACT Water Resources Environmental Flow Guidelines 2013. Final report to EPSDD, ACT Government. Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra. Inquiries regarding this document should be addressed to: Dr. Fiona Dyer Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Canberra 2601 Telephone: (02) 6201 2452 Facsimile: (02) 6201 5651 Email: [email protected] Document history and status Version Date Issued Reviewed by Approved by Revision Type Draft 07/08/2017 IAE EFG review Adrian Dusting Internal team Final 11/08/2017 Adrian Dusting Fiona Dyer Internal Final - revised 15/11/2017 ACT Gov. steering Adrian Dusting External committee, EFTAG, MDBA Front cover photo: Cotter River at Top Flats. Photo by Fiona Dyer APPLIEDECOLOGY.EDU.AU ii ACT ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES: REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................... vii Background and
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment ______
    APPENDIX O ABORIGINAL CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT _____________________________________________________________________________ Snowy 2.0 Exploratory Works Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Date: 20 July 2018 Author: Dr Julie Dibden NSW Archaeology Pty Ltd Proponent: Snowy Hydro Limited Local Government Area: Snowy Valleys & Snowy Monaro Regional Councils TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 9 1.1 THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................... 9 1.2 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ..................................................................................10 1.3 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY WORKS .................................................................10 1.4 PROPONENT .......................................................................................................12 1.5 ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS ...............................................12 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT – EXPLORATORY WORKS .......................14 2.1 THE EXPLORATORY WORKS.................................................................................14 2.2 EXPLORATORY TUNNEL......................................................................................15 2.3 PORTAL CONSTRUCTION COMPOUND .................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Australian Capital Territory
    5. Australian Capital Territory Introduction Mark Lintermans, Environment ACT The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) is the smallest of Australia’s States and Territories (235,600 ha) but has a diverse range of aquatic habitats ranging from small subalpine bogs to the larger riverine systems such as the Murrumbidgee River. However the geographic location and altitude of the ACT preclude some wetland types which are common in other States and the Northern Territory. For example the inland location of the ACT means that there are no marine, estuarine or brackish wetlands. Similarly, with the location of the ACT in the south-eastern highlands, large lowland floodplain systems are also absent. The first substantial review of aquatic ecosystems in the ACT was conducted by Hogg and Wicks (1989). This review dealt mainly with lotic systems and did not attempt to cover the high altitude wetlands such as fens and bogs. Subsequently Evans and Keenan (1993) reviewed the published and unpublished literature on high altitude wetlands in the ACT. The ACT is located within two biogeographic regions defined by Thackway and Cresswell (1995) as the Australian Alps, and the South Eastern Highlands, with the majority of its important wetlands being found in the Australian Alps bioregion. Most of the significant high altitude wetlands of the ACT are located in the Cotter and Gudgenby River catchments. The Cotter River catchment lies between the Brindabella Range in the west, the Bimberi and Scabby Ranges in the south and the Cotter/Gudgenby divide in the east. The tops of these ranges form the western and southern borders of the ACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourist Drive 7 Yass to Tumut
    A B C D E F G H Source: © Department of Lands TO GRENFELL 24km TO COWRA 27km TO OBERON 44km Panorama Avenue Bathurst 2795 HENRY Koorawatha Wyangala www.lpi.nsw.gov.au Dam © Copyright LPI &CartoscopePtyLtd CARTOSCOPE www.maps.com.au LAWSON River HWY RD 22 1 RD 1 Yass to TumutA41 - stay on the Tourist Drive 7 Bendick Creek WAY Murrell 23 BIGGA 28 14 River 82 29 POINT Distance: From Wee Jasper to TuenaTumut you pass through dry B81 Yass to Wee Jasper 52 km - allow 1hr 14 sclerophyll forest, farming land and pine forests. RD RD River MILVALE Frogmore River Murruin Wee Jasper toYOUNG Tumut 68km - allow 1.15hr Beautiful multi-agedCk stands of eucalypt with an 21 Bicentennial JUNCTION 11 National Trail Chinaman's 13 understory dominated by11 hard leafed shrubs, grasses, Dam 25 WAY Creek Bolong 2 MOPPITY TO TEMORA 43km OLYMPIC 2 Road conditions: bracken and fern, line the roads and go back into the 20 14 23 Tourist Drive 7 Yass to Wee17 A41 Jasper - Sealed forest depths. BINDA 18 R RD 16 RD 10 Wee Jasper to Tumut - Unsealed - not recommendedBOOROWA Wallendbeen 50 TYRL 34 RD 8 TYRL for caravans or long vehicles LAGGAN TARALGA 28 20 RD Taralga 18 HARDEN RD Road conditionsMURRUMBURRAH and travelling times will depend on CROOKWELL 5 TO TEMORA 39km BURLEY CARRABUNGLA 45 theBradman's weather Birthplace and your vehicle.24 RD 3 14 3 COOTAMUNDRA 12 Drive carefully along Tourist Drive 7 as there is often Windfarm RD B94 7 GRIFFIN Pejar Dam stock and wildlife on the road.Gilbert's Grave River GULLEN 42 VALLEY 48 30 Tarlo 14 41 Ck River TO JUNEE 43km 20
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Flow in Regulated and Unregulated Streams in Eastern Australia
    Characterisation of Flow in Regulated and Unregulated Streams in Eastern Australia Characterisation of Flow in Regulated and Unregulated Streams in Eastern Australia Jane Growns Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre Nick Marsh Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology Technical Report 3/2000 September 2000 Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology i Characterisation of Flow in Regulated and Unregulated Streams in Eastern Australia The Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology improves the health of Australia’s rivers, lakes and wetlands through research, education and knowledge exchange. It was established in 1993 under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre Program. The Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology is a collaborative venture between: • ACTEW Corporation • CSIRO Land and Water • Department of Land and Water Conservation, NSW • Department of Natural Resources, Queensland • Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria • Environment ACT • Environment Protection Authority, NSW • Environment Protection Authority, Victoria • Goulburn–Murray Rural Water Authority • Griffith University • La Trobe University • Lower Murray Water • Melbourne Water • Monash University • Murray-Darling Basin Commission • Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre • Sunraysia Rural Water Authority • Sydney Catchment Authority • University of Canberra Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology Ph: 02 6201 5168 Fax: 02 6201 5038 Email: [email protected] http://freshwater.canberra.edu.au Printed in September 2000 Growns, Jane. Characterisation of flow in regulated and unregulated streams in eastern Australia. Bibliography. ISBN 1 876810 06 8 Streamflow – Australia, Eastern. I. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology (Australia). II. Title. (Series : Technical report (Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology) ; 2000/3).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Translucent Flows in the Murrumbidgee
    Assessing translucent environmental water releases in the Murrumbidgee River below Burrinjuck Dam, 1999-2002 Report 3. Effect of translucent releases on biofilms and periphyton in the Murrumbidgee River Published by the NSW Department of Primary Industries, Office of Water Assessing translucent environmental water releases in the Murrumbidgee River below Burrinjuck Dam, 1999-2002; Report 3, Effect of Translucent Releases on Periphyton Communities in the Murrumbidgee Catchment First published July 2014 ISBN 978 1 74256 More information Lorraine Hardwick, Ben Wolfenden, David Ryan, Bruce Chessman, Doug Westhorpe, Simon Mitrovic www.dpi.nsw.gov.au Acknowledgments Lee Bowling, Simon Williams Alpine River, Kosciusko National Park, photo by Lorraine Hardwick JTN 12772 © State of New South Wales through the Department of Trade and Investment, Regional Infrastructure and Services, 2014. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the NSW Department of Primary Industries as the owner. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2014). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of the Department of Primary Industries or the user’s independent adviser. Assessing translucent environmental water releases in the Murrumbidgee River below
    [Show full text]
  • Water Security for the ACT and Region
    Water Security for the ACT and Region Recommendations to ACT Government July 2007 © ACTEW Corporation Ltd This publication is copyright and contains information that is the property of ACTEW Corporation Ltd. It may be reproduced for the purposes of use while engaged on ACTEW commissioned projects, but is not to be communicated in whole or in part to any third party without prior written consent. Water Security Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this report 1 1.2 Setting the Scene 1 1.3 A Fundamental Change in Assumptions 3 1.4 Water Management in the ACT 6 2 Future Water Options 8 2.1 Reliance on Catchment Inflows 8 2.2 Seawater Source 12 2.3 Groundwater 13 2.4 Water Purification Scheme 13 2.5 Stormwater Use 14 2.6 Rainwater Tanks 15 2.7 Greywater Use 16 2.8 Other non potable reuse options – large scale irrigation 16 2.9 Accelerated Demand Management 17 2.10 Cloud Seeding 18 2.11 Watermining TM 19 2.12 Evaporation Control on Reservoirs 19 2.13 Preferred Options 19 3 Cotter Dam Enlargement 20 3.1 Description of Proposal 20 3.2 Description and History of the Area 20 3.3 Existing Water Storages in the Cotter Catchment 21 3.4 Planning, Environment and Heritage Considerations 22 3.5 Proposed Enlarged Cotter Dam and Associated Infrastructure 23 3.6 Cost Estimate 23 4 Water Purification Scheme 24 4.1 Description of Proposal 24 4.2 Water Purification Plant 24 4.3 Commissioning Phase 28 4.4 Brine Management and Disposal 29 4.5 Energy 29 4.6 Cost Estimates 29 Document No: 314429 - Water security for the
    [Show full text]
  • Part B the Project
    Part B The project Environmental Assessment (NSW) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (ACT) Chapter 5 Strategic context and need 5.1 Overview As Canberra has grown, so has the demand for water. Significant planning has been undertaken to identify options for securing the supply of water for existing and future ACT and Queanbeyan residents, leading to recommendations by the proponent to the ACT Government in 2007. Those recommendations recognised the need to diversify the source of water supply. The work was based on six key assumptions: • The ACT Government water conservation targets will be met; • Environmental flows will be delivered according to ACT Government guidelines; • Catchment re-growth will respond to bushfires; • The population will continue to grow according to the ACT Government's spatial plan; • ACTEW will meet its service obligations to customers; and • Projections of climate change and variability will occur in line with predictions. More recently, the proponent advised the ACT Government that assumptions relating to climate change and climate variability no longer appeared to hold. This was demonstrated by declines in inflows to the ACT's water storages compared to the long term average. There has been a significant decrease in runoff to the ACT’s water storages over the past six years. In 2006, inflows were the lowest on record. The proponent's advice was that the medium to long term outlook was for a further significant deterioration in inflows. Population projections also changed with projections by the Australian Bureau of Statistics of increases greater than foreshadowed and used in the Canberra Spatial Plan. The proponent indicated that the key challenge for the medium to long term was to build additional water supply assets that could cope not just with substantially reduced inflows but also with more frequent and longer droughts.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Blackfish the Gadopsidae Contains Two
    SOF text final l/out 12/12/02 12:16 PM Page 41 4.1.7 Family Gadopsidae: Freshwater Blackfish The Gadopsidae contains two described species in a single genus in Australian freshwaters, of which one species is recognised as locally threatened. There is thought to be an undescribed species complex consisting of two species within Gadopsis marmoratus. Gadopsids are restricted to southeastern Australia. There is one species found in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment, the Two-spined Blackfish. Common Name: Two-spined Blackfish Scientific Name: Gadopsis bispinosus Sanger 1984 Other Common Names: Slippery, Slimy, Greasy, Tailor, Marbled Cod, Nikki, Nikki Long Tom Other Scientific Names: None (previously included in Gadopsis marmoratus) Marbled form. Photo: N. Armstrong Biology and Habitat The Two-spined Blackfish occurs only in inland drainage’s of south-eastern Australia where it is restricted to cool, clear upland or montane streams with abundant instream cover, usually in the form of boulders and cobble. They are a small to medium-size species with adults generally 180–250 mm long and less than 200 g. They are found more in the medium to larger streams where there is greater water depth and lower stream velocity, and are not found in the smallest headwater streams. They are generally found in forested catchments, where there is little sediment input to the stream from erosion or other land management practices. Fish in the Upper Murrumbidgee Catchment: A Review of Current Knowledge 41 SOF text final l/out 12/12/02 12:16 PM Page 42 The diet is characterised by a predominance of aquatic insect larvae, particularly mayflies, caddisflies and midges.
    [Show full text]