DOCSLIB.ORG

California State University, Northridge Memorialization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California State University, Northridge Memorialization CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE MEMORIALIZATION AND MEMORY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA’S ST. FRANCIS DAM DISASTER OF 1928 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Public Archaeology By Ann C. Stansell August 2014 The thesis of Ann C. Stansell is approved: _____________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Rachel F. Giraudo Date _____________________________________________ _______________ Dr. Sabina Magliocco Date _____________________________________________ _______________ Dr. James E. Snead, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research project would not have been possible without the contributions of many individuals to whom I am heavily indebted. I am grateful to Dr. James E. Snead for engaging me in the subject of the St. Francis Dam Disaster and providing support by creating the Forgotten Casualties Project, arranging access to the St. Francis Dam Disaster Claims Files, and hosting the Facebook page St. Francis Dam Archaeology. I appreciate the Anthropology Department at California State University, Northridge, for hosting the Forgotten Casualties Project, faculty and staff for encouraging me to present at archaeological conferences and host annual data sharing meetings, and my committee, Dr. James E. Snead, Dr. Sabina Magliocco, and Dr. Rachel F. Giraudo, for their mentoring throughout the writing of this thesis. Thanks are due to Krystal Kissinger and Efren Martinez for researching and presenting on aspects of the disaster, as well as Julee Licon, for conducting and transcribing interviews and accompanying me to numerous libraries, museums, and cemeteries. The support of the following individuals was also integral and deserves recognition: Paul Soifer, consulting historian for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Angela Tatum, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Records Center; Charles Johnson, Ventura County Museum; Joanna Huckabee, David Peebles, Mike McIntyre, Thalia Ryder, and Darrell Vance, Angeles National Forest; Ellen Jarosz, CSUN Oviatt Special Collections Library; Martha Gentry, Fillmore Historical Museum; Jeanne Orcutt, California Oil Museum; Mary Alice Henderson, Santa Paula Historical Society; Alan Pollack, Leon Worden, Frank Rock “The Dam Man,” Tricia Putnam, Lauren Parker, Tony Newhall, and other members of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society; artist Robert Reynolds and curator/art historian Dr. Charlotte Eyerman, Los Angeles Natural History Museum; Keith and Michelle iii Buttelman, Pony Horton, Peggy Kelly, John Nichols, Don Ray, and other dam enthusiasts (dammies); Dan Kott and Gloria Moore; Jason Brice, Mokhtar “Mo” Mouray, Jeffrey Follin, and Ron Walters, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Charles Outland, Dr. Norris C. Hundley, Dr. Donald C. Jackson, Dr. J. David Rogers, and Jon Wilkman, past and present St. Francis Dam Disaster researchers; Craig Held, owner of the Cruz Azul Mexicana Scrapbook; Terry Foley, owner of the Thornton Edwards medal; Doug Basolo, manager of Bardsdale Cemetery; and Syrus Keatley, owner of Ruiz Cemetery. Finally, none of this would have been possible without the unconditional support of my husband Daniel, family, and friends. Thank you all. iv DEDICATION For the residents of the Santa Clarita Valley and the Santa Clara River Valley, in memory of the victims of the Santa Clara Flood who perished following the breaking of the St. Francis Dam. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page………………………………………………………………………..……….ii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….……….iii Dedication………………………………………………………………………………….….v List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………….x List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………..xii Abstract………………………………………………………………………………….......xvi Chapter I: Introduction………………………………………..………………………………1 Historical Background………………………………………………………………...3 Study Area…………………………………………………………………………….6 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………..8 Research Questions……………………………………………………………………9 Chapter II: Historical Background………………………….……………………………….14 Water Resources in the West………………………………………………………...14 Pueblo into City: Mulholland and the First Los Angeles Aqueduct…………………16 Construction of the St. Francis Dam………………………………………..…….….23 Physical Setting of the Dam and Flood Path………………………………………...26 Everything in its Path: Details of the Disaster……………………………………….29 Recovery Efforts: Care of the Survivors and Disposal of the Dead…………………36 Restoration Efforts: Citizens Committees’ and the Claims Process…………………39 Legacy..........................................................................................................................41 Chapter III: Theoretical Perspectives………………………………………………………..45 Mnemonic Communities: Identity, Memory, and Heritage as a Social Process…….46 vi Mnemonic Landscapes and Objects: Monuments, Memorials, and Memorabilia...…48 Forgetting: Out of Sight, Out of Mind……………………………………………….51 Memorialization after Disaster: Catastrophe as a Social Process……………………54 Historical Archaeologists as Heritage Practitioners…………………………………56 Chapter IV: Methodology………………………...…………………………………………62 Archival Research……………………………………………………………………62 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Records Center…….………..64 Ventura County Museum Research Library…………………………………70 Angeles National Forest Supervisor’s Office…….………………………….73 Los Angeles Central Library…………………………………………………74 Old Town Newhall Library……………………………………….………….76 California State University, Northridge, Oviatt Library……………………..77 Fillmore Public Library and Historical Museum…………………………….78 Santa Paula Blanchard Public Library……………………………………….79 Historical Societies and Dammies…………………………………………...81 Field Research…………………….………………………………………………….82 Monuments, Memorials, and Memorabilia ……………………….…………83 Grave Markers……………………………………………………………….84 Public Outreach………………………………………………………………………87 Research Schedule…………………………………………………………………...89 Chapter V: Data Presentation……………..………………………………………………….90 Monuments and Memorials………………………………………………………….90 Ruins of the St. Francis Dam………………………………………………...90 vii California State Landmark No. 919 Plaque………………………………….96 LADWP Memorial ………………………………..…………………………99 Forest Service Memorial……………………………………………………100 Newhall Cowboys Memorial……………………………………………….103 The Warning Monument……………………………………………………105 Grave Markers……………………………………………………………………...108 Burials within the Flood Zone………………………………….…………..108 Ruiz-Perea Cemetery……………………………………………….109 Bardsdale Cemetery……………………………...…………………110 Piru Cemetery…………………………...………………………….114 Santa Paula Cemetery………………………………………………115 Ivy Lawn Cemetery…………………….…………………………..119 Santa Clara Cemetery………………………………………………120 Burials within the Greater Los Angeles area……………………………….122 Burials throughout the United States……………………………………….125 Museum Exhibits and Memorabilia………………………………………………...125 Tesoro Adobe Historic Park Display…………………………………….…127 Saugus Community Club Plaque………………………………..………….128 San Francisquito Canyon Schoolhouse Bell……………………………..…129 Valencia Car Wash Display……………………………………………...…130 Fillmore Historical Museum Exhibit……………………………………….131 Cruz Azul Scrapbook……………………………………………………….132 California Oil Museum Exhibits……………………………………………133 viii Isensee Panorama Images…………………………………………………..135 Medals………………………………………………………………………137 Conceptual Commemorations: Postcards, Pamphlets, Poems and Songs………….138 Memorial Highway…………………………………………………………143 Folklore……………………………………………………………………..145 Chapter VI: Analysis……………………………………………………………………….148 Research Questions Revisited ……………………………………………………...148 Objects and Afterlives………………………………………………………………155 Opportunity for Comparison: Mill River, Johnstown, and Buffalo Creek Floods…156 Chapter VI: Discussion……………………………………………………………………..159 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….159 Future Research…………………………………………………………………….162 References Cited……………………………………………………………………………164 Appendix A. California Public Records Act Records Request Form………………………182 Appendix B. List of St. Francis Dam Disaster Victims…………………………………….184 Appendix C. Grave Marker Data for Cemeteries in the Flood Zone……………………….193 Appendix D. Grave Marker Data for Cemeteries in the Greater Los Angeles Area……….197 Appendix E. Grave Marker Data for Cemeteries outside of the Greater Los Angeles Area…………………………………………………………………………………………201 ix List of Tables 2.1 Legend (and translation) for Rancho San Francisco map…………………………....27 4.1 Files digitized at the LADWP Records Center from Water Services (Aqueduct) Historical Records WP 19-17 through WP 19-27………………………66 4.2 Files digitized at the LADWP Records Center from City Attorney’s Office Historical Records WP 02-41 through WP 02-80……………………………67 4.3 Information compiled for each victim……………………………………………….67 4.4 Records reviewed and selectively digitized at the Ventura County Museum……….71 4.5 Newspaper clippings and other articles from the St. Francis Dam Disaster Ephemera file digitized at the Ventura County Museum…………………………….72 4.6 Additional miscellaneous items from the St. Francis Dam Disaster Ephemera file, digitized at the Ventura County Museum....................................................................72 4.7 Records reviewed and photocopied at the Angeles National Forest Supervisors Office…………………………………….……………………………..73 4.8 Records reviewed and digitized from the California Vertical File, St. Francis Dam, at the Los Angeles Central Library………………………………..75 4.9 Records reviewed and digitized at the Old Town Newhall Library…………………76 4.10 Records reviewed and digitized at the Oviatt
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANALYSIS This Ordinance Amends the Water Pipeline Franchise Granted to Valencia Water Company by Ordinance No. 91-0042F, by Exte
    ANALYSIS This ordinance amends the water pipeline franchise granted to Valencia Water Company by Ordinance No. 91-0042F, by extending the term of the franchise to December 31, 2018, clarifying the exclusion on the transportation of hazardous substances or hazardous waste; expanding the franchise area southerly boundary; and making other minor changes to clarify certain provisions in the ordinance. MARY C. WICKHAM Counsel KATHY BRAMWELL Principal Deputy County Counsel Contracts Division KB:pt Requested: 7/9/15 Revised: 7/20/15 HOA. 1178251.1 ORDINANCE NO. _____________ An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 91-0042F, as amended, a water pipeline franchise granted to Valencia Water Company. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles ordains as follows: SECTIO 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 91-0042F, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 1. Franchise Term; Grant. The right, privilege, and franchise is granted to Valencia Water Company (“Franchisee”), its successors and assigns~ to lay or construct from time to time and for the period of twenty five (25) years through December 31, 2018, to lay, construct, reconstruct, maintain, operate, repair, renew, change the size of, remove or abandon in place pipes and pipelines for the transportation and distribution of water, waste water, mud, steam and other liquid substances, except excluding any hazardous substances or hazardous waste within the meaning of the “Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980”, 42 U.S.C. section 9601 et seq., as it may hereafter be amended, the “Federal Pollution Water Pollution Control Act”, 33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Cultural Resources
    4.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION W & S Consultants, (W&S) conducted an archaeological survey of the project site that included an archival record search conducted at the local California Historic Resource Information System (CHRIS) repository at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) located on the campus of California State University, Fullerton. In July 2010, a field survey of the 1.2-mile proposed project site was conducted. The archaeological survey report can be found in Appendix 4.3. Mitigation measures are recommended which would reduce potential impacts to unknown archeological resources within the project site, potential impacts to paleontological resources, and the discovery of human remains during construction to less than significant. PROJECT BACKGROUND Ethnographic Setting Tataviam The upper Santa Clara Valley region, including the study area, was inhabited during the ethnographic past by an ethnolinguistic group known as the Tataviam.1 Their language represents a member of the Takic branch of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family.2 In this sense, it was related to other Takic languages in the Los Angeles County region, such as Gabrielino/Fernandeño (Tongva) of the Los Angeles Basin proper, and Kitanemuk of the Antelope Valley. The Tataviam are thought to have inhabited the upper Santa Clara River drainage from about Piru eastwards to just beyond the Vasquez Rocks/Agua Dulce area; southwards as far as Newhall and the crests of the San Gabriel and Santa Susana Mountains; and northwards to include the middle reaches of Piru Creek, the Liebre Mountains, and the southwesternmost fringe of Antelope Valley.3 Their northern boundary most likely ran along the northern foothills of the Liebre Mountains (i.e., the edge of Antelope Valley), and then crossed to the southern slopes of the Sawmill Mountains and Sierra Pelona, extending 1 NEA, and King, Chester.
    [Show full text]
  • February 24, 2009
    PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED WILLIAM S. HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ROMERO CANYON HIGH SCHOOL SITE APN 3247-068-001 and 3247-068-004 (TENTATIVE TRACT 47807) LOCATED IN THE CASTAIC AREA OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Donna Hebert Project Manager Padre Associates, Inc. 1861 Knoll Drive Ventura, CA 93003 Prepared by: Gwen R. Romani, M.A. Principal Investigator April 28, 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 Project Location and Description 1 2.0 Study Findings 1 3.0 Introduction 2 4.0 Regulatory Requirements 2 4.1 California Register of Historical Resources 2 5.0 Background Information 2 5.1 Environmental Setting 2 5.2 Prehistoric Overview 4 5.3 Ethnographic Overview 5 5.4 Historical Overview 6 6.0 Records Search 8 6.1 Introduction 8 6.2 Native American Coordination 9 6.3 Results of the Records Search 9 7.0 Field Investigation 10 7.1 Results of the Field Survey 11 8.0 Recommendations 12 9.0 Certification 12 10.0 References 13 Appendices Appendix A: Figures Figure 1: Project Location and Vicinity Map Figure 2: Proposed Grading Plan for the Romero Canyon High School Site Appendix B: Native American Consultation Appendix C: Photographs 1-10 i PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED WILLIAM S. HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ROMERO CANYON HIGH SCHOOL SITE APN 3247-068-001 and 3247-068-004 (TENTATIVE TRACT 47807) LOCATED IN THE CASTAIC AREA OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 1.0 Project Location and Description At the request of Donna Hebert, Project Manager for Padre Associates, Inc., Compass Rose Archaeological, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance
    Annual Report Market Issues and Performance 2006 Department of Market Monitoring California Independent System Operator Department of Market Monitoring – California ISO April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Overview................................................................................................................................................... 1 Total Wholesale Energy and Ancillary Service Costs ..............................................................................3 Market Rule Changes ............................................................................................................................... 4 Increase in Bid Cap for Energy and Ancillary Services........................................................................ 4 Enforcement of Amendment 72 – Load Scheduling Requirement....................................................... 5 System Resource Adequacy Requirements ........................................................................................ 6 Reliability Capacity Service Tariff (RCST) ........................................................................................... 7 Long-term Procurement Plans ............................................................................................................. 9 General Market Conditions..................................................................................................................... 10 Demand
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Planning Study Central California Clean Energy Transmission Project
    Preliminary Planning Study Central California Clean Energy Transmission Project Study Plan Version 1.2 February 29, 2008 Stakeholder Group Study 1 Table of Contents Study Objective...................................................................................................................3 Potential Alternatives ..........................................................................................................3 Alt-1: Status Quo.............................................................................................................3 Alt-2: Central California Clean Transmission Project (C3ETP).....................................3 Alt-3: Same as Alt-2, except building a Midway – E2 Single Circuit Tower Line (SCTL) ............................................................................................................................5 Alt-4: Build a Whirlwind – San Joaquin - E2 500 kV DCTL.........................................5 Alt-5: Build a Midway – E2 230 kV DCTL...................................................................5 Alt-6: Build a new PG&E and SCE Big Creek 230 kV Tie............................................6 Alt-7: Build a Midway – McCall – E2 230 kV DCTL....................................................6 Alt-8: Build a Gates – Gregg 230 kV DCTL ..................................................................6 Alt-9: Raisin City Switching Station...............................................................................7 Alt-10: New Generation..................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Birds of Griffith Park
    Annotated Checklist of Birds of Griffith Park April 2007 Last updated August 15, 2007 Daniel S. Cooper (DSC) Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. 15 So. Raymond Ave., 2nd Fl. Pasadena, CA 91105 [email protected] [ ] = Los Angeles River portion only * = breeding confirmed (c. 50 species) *? = breeding suspected (17 species) Three-letter acronyms (e.g. BUR, HOL) are local atlas blocks based on USGS topographic maps used by the Los Angeles County Breeding Bird Survey. Regularly-occurring (151) [Canada Goose Branta canadensis] Non-breeding (?) resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. [Wood Duck Aix sponsa] Winter resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. [Gadwall Anas strepera] Winter resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. [American Wigeon Anas americana] Winter resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. [*Mallard Anas platyrhynchos] Breeding resident, mainly along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. Ducklings noted vic. Los Feliz Blvd. on 10 May 2007 (DSC). [Blue-winged Teal Anas discors] Winter resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. [*Cinnamon Teal Anas cyanoptera] Breeding resident in small numbers along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. Nesting records include fledglings on 07 July 1995 and on 19 July 1999 (both LACBBA); copulating pair just north of Los Feliz Blvd. on 11 May 2007. [Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata] Winter resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. [Northern Pintail Anas acuta] Winter resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. [Green-winged Teal Anas crecca] Winter resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River. [Ring-necked Duck Aythya collaris] Winter resident along vegetated portions of the Los Angeles River.
    [Show full text]
  • To Oral History
    100 E. Main St. [email protected] Ventura, CA 93001 (805) 653-0323 x 320 QUARTERLY JOURNAL SUBJECT INDEX About the Index The index to Quarterly subjects represents journals published from 1955 to 2000. Fully capitalized access terms are from Library of Congress Subject Headings. For further information, contact the Librarian. Subject to availability, some back issues of the Quarterly may be ordered by contacting the Museum Store: 805-653-0323 x 316. A AB 218 (Assembly Bill 218), 17/3:1-29, 21 ill.; 30/4:8 AB 442 (Assembly Bill 442), 17/1:2-15 Abadie, (Señor) Domingo, 1/4:3, 8n3; 17/2:ABA Abadie, William, 17/2:ABA Abbott, Perry, 8/2:23 Abella, (Fray) Ramon, 22/2:7 Ablett, Charles E., 10/3:4; 25/1:5 Absco see RAILROADS, Stations Abplanalp, Edward "Ed," 4/2:17; 23/4:49 ill. Abraham, J., 23/4:13 Abu, 10/1:21-23, 24; 26/2:21 Adams, (rented from Juan Camarillo, 1911), 14/1:48 Adams, (Dr.), 4/3:17, 19 Adams, Alpha, 4/1:12, 13 ph. Adams, Asa, 21/3:49; 21/4:2 map Adams, (Mrs.) Asa (Siren), 21/3:49 Adams Canyon, 1/3:16, 5/3:11, 18-20; 17/2:ADA Adams, Eber, 21/3:49 Adams, (Mrs.) Eber (Freelove), 21/3:49 Adams, George F., 9/4:13, 14 Adams, J. H., 4/3:9, 11 Adams, Joachim, 26/1:13 Adams, (Mrs.) Mable Langevin, 14/1:1, 4 ph., 5 Adams, Olen, 29/3:25 Adams, W. G., 22/3:24 Adams, (Mrs.) W.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1980
    Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1980 Robert L. Richardson, Jr. A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2009 Approved by, Michael H. Hunt, Chair Richard Kohn Timothy McKeown Nancy Mitchell Roger Lotchin Abstract Robert L. Richardson, Jr. Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1985 (Under the direction of Michael H. Hunt) This dissertation examines the origins and evolution of neoconservatism as a philosophical and political movement in America from 1945 to 1980. I maintain that as the exigencies and anxieties of the Cold War fostered new intellectual and professional connections between academia, government and business, three disparate intellectual currents were brought into contact: the German philosophical tradition of anti-modernism, the strategic-analytical tradition associated with the RAND Corporation, and the early Cold War anti-Communist tradition identified with figures such as Reinhold Niebuhr. Driven by similar aims and concerns, these three intellectual currents eventually coalesced into neoconservatism. As a political movement, neoconservatism sought, from the 1950s on, to re-orient American policy away from containment and coexistence and toward confrontation and rollback through activism in academia, bureaucratic and electoral politics. Although the neoconservatives were only partially successful in promoting their transformative project, their accomplishments are historically significant. More specifically, they managed to interject their views and ideas into American political and strategic thought, discredit détente and arms control, and shift U.S. foreign policy toward a more confrontational stance vis-à-vis the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Safety Legislation in California
    Brief Overview of DAM SAFETY LEGISLATION IN CALIFORNIA J. David Rogers, Ph.D., P.E., P.G. Karl F. Hasselmann Chair in Geological Engineering Missouri University of Science & Technology DAM SAFETY LEGISLATION • In 1915 the State legislature passed a law requiring all plans for dams and reservoirs to be submitted to the State Engineer for approval,but the act provided no penalty for failure to comply. • Following a 2-year study, in August 1916 the State Reclamation Board issued a report recommending that the State Engineer regulate all storage reservoirs. • No further action was taken by the legislature until after January 1916 floods in Southern California FLOOD OF JANUARY 1916 • Sweetwater Dam was raised 15 feet in 1910-11, increasing the reservoir capacity by 70% (designed by James D. Schuyler). • In January 1916, 8 to 20 inches of rain fell on the area, causing a peak discharge of 45,500 cfs for an hour, and an average flow of 20,000 cfs over 24 hours. The dam was overtopped to a depth of 3.66 feet, washing out the south abutment dike (shown here). 8 people were killed by the flooding. We would never build an arch dam in such fractured rock today. LOWER OTAY DAM FAILURE (1916) View from just downstream of the dam View from upstream of the dam site • On January 27, 1916 the Lower Otay Reservoir rose 9.5 ft between 7AM and 5 PM, when the flow began to overtop the dam • When the overflow reached 3,500 cfs it triggered severe erosion of the dam, causing it to fail within 5 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of High-Temperature Superconducting Power Technologies on Reliability, Power Transfer Capacity, and Energy Use
    STRENGTHENING THE GRID Effect of High-Temperature Superconducting Power Technologies on Reliability, Power Transfer Capacity, and Energy Use Richard Silberglitt Emile Ettedgui Anders Hove Science and Technology Policy Institute R Prepared for the Department of Energy The research described in this report was conducted by RAND’s Science and Technology Policy Institute for the Department of Energy under contract ENG- 9812731. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Silberglitt, R. S. (Richard S.) Strengthening the grid : effect of high temperature superconducting (HTS) power technologies on reliability, power transfer capacity, and energy use / Richard Silberglitt, Emile Ettedgui, and Anders Hove. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1531.” ISBN 0-8330-3173-2 1. Electric power systems—Materials. 2. Electric power systems—Reliability. 3. High temperature superconductors. I. Ettedgui, Emile. II. Hove, Anders. III.Title. TK1005 .S496 2002 621.31—dc21 2002021398 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s pub- lications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover illustration by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile Formation and Talus
    Nature and History on the Sierra Crest: Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile formation and talus. (Devils Postpile National Monument Image Collection) Nature and History on the Sierra Crest Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Christopher E. Johnson Historian, PWRO–Seattle National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 2013 Production Project Manager Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Copyeditor Heather Miller Composition Windfall Software Photographs Credit given with each caption Printer Government Printing Office Published by the United States National Park Service, Pacific West Regional Office, Seattle, Washington. Printed on acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America. 10987654321 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Element 2013
    ADOPTED MAY 8, 2013 Safety Element 2013 This element establishes goals, objectives, and policies to assist the City of Camarillo in assuring that the community is safe from natural and man-made hazards. CAMARILLO CITY OF CAMARILLO SAFETY ELEMENT 2013 Prepared for: City of Camarillo Community Development Department 601 Carmen Drive Camarillo, California 93010 Prepared by: RBF Consulting 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, California 92618 CITY OF CAMARILLO SAFETY ELEMENT 2013 11.0 City of Camarillo Safety Element Adopted: May 8, 2013 Previously Adopted: November 29, 1989 & August 8, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS 11.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 11-1 11.1.1 Authority for Element ..................................................................................... 11-1 11.1.2 Element Organization...................................................................................... 11-1 11.1.3 Relationship to Other General Plan Elements .................................................. 11-2 11.2 Camarillo Safety Setting, Regulations, and Related Documents .................................. 11-3 11.2.1 Existing Setting ................................................................................................ 11-3 11.2.2 Regulatory Framework .................................................................................. 11-52 11.3 Context for Safety Element Policy ............................................................................. 11-58 11.4
    [Show full text]