DOCSLIB.ORG

Southwell Town Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Parish and Town Council submissions to the Newark and Sherwood District Council electoral review This PDF contains 18 submissions from parish and town councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission that you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. From: Balderton Parish Council [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 25 July 2013 15:19 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral Review of Newark and Sherwood District Council Dear Sirs, Thank you for notification of the above review. I write on behalf of Balderton Parish Council in response to the consultation of new ward boundaries within Newark & Sherwood District Council. Having reviewed the information members expressed the following concerns and asked that they be submitted: a) Balderton could not afford to lose a District Councillor as it is a very busy, heavily populated village. b) Balderton should retain four District members, particularly with the imminent amount of residential development to take place in the village resulting from the agreed Newark Growth Point. c) The confusion should be removed for parishioners on Staple Lane because one half of the properties along Staple Lane are in Fernwood Ward and one half are in Balderton Ward for County Council purposes, but the whole of Staple Lane residents are included within the Balderton District and Parish Wards. The parish map boundary includes Staple Lane properties, so for the sake of the few houses concerned they should all be included in the County’s Balderton Ward. Thank you, Mrs Cheryl Davison‐Lyth Clerk to Balderton Parish Council 1 From: Catherine Millward Sent: 24 June 2013 12:16 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral review of Newark and Sherwood - Caunton Parish Council response Dear Sirs Caunton Parish Council discussed the electoral review at its meeting on 12 June 2013. The councillors are concerned that Caunton, as a small rural village, has particular needs and concerns which are specifically compatible with those of other similar communities. These communities share the same issues with regard to, for example, access to schools, transport, youth and elderly services and rural business needs. Naturally, the larger towns and villages in the area have different needs and priorities. With this in view, the Council unanimously agreed that, to ensure meaningful, effective and equal representation of the Caunton populace, any proposal should ensure that Caunton is grouped with villages and parishes of a similar character as it is now. As you will appreciate, the Council's small size and very limited resources preclude the collation of detailed data. However, the Council strongly feels that, for the reasons set out above, any proposals should take account of the Council's view, formed on the basis of its in depth knowledge of its community and of those around it. Yours faithfully, Catherine Millward Clerk to Caunton Parish Council 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Newark and Sherwood District Personal Details: Name: Margaret Evans E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Halloughton Parish Meeting Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: I am writing on behalf of Halloughton Parish,its Chair Mr Richard Elliott and Clerk Mr Paul Birks. Halloughton Parish met on August 2nd 2013, and unanimously agreed the following statement: 1. "The new pattern should mean that each councillor represents roughly the same number of voters as elected members elsewhere in the authority." The small settlement of Halloughton, which has been located in the West Ward of Southwell since time immemorial, comprises around 55 people. The total population of Southwell West Ward is 3011, and of the whole of Southwell, including Halloughton, 7297 (2011 Census). It is appropriate for Halloughton to remain part of Southwell West Ward and part of the overall total for Southwell. The small number of voters in Halloughton would not adversely affect any new ward divisions for Southwell. 2. "Ward patterns should - as far as possible - reflect community interests and identities and boundaries should be identifiable." Halloughton people have always considered themselves part of Southwell, situated within its Civil Parish. Halloughton shares the same post code as Southwell, its inhabitants are registered with the Southwell Health Centre, attend the dentist in Southwell and the children attend the local pre-, primary and secondary schools in Southwell. The nearest local shops, Post Office and Library are all in Southwell. At only 1.9km distant from the centre of Southwell and less from the Minster School and Leisure Centre (10 minutes walk), Halloughton is nearer to many Southwell facilities than poeple living within the urban settlement area in the north of Southwell. Halloughton is located immediately adjacent, across the A612 road, to the Brackenhurst campus of Nottingham Trent University, which similarly has very close links with the town of Southwell and is also located within Southwell Civil Parish. Its students use Southwell as their main centre for retail and leisure needs and Brackenhurst students also find placements in farms within Halloughton. The boundary between the next ward, Trent Ward, is clearly identified by Halloughton Dumble, some 1km distant from Halloughton. This separates the ancient Halloughton parish from the land surrounding the villages of Bleasby (3km distant) and Thurgarton (also 3km distant). 3. "The electoral arrangements should promote effective and convenient local government..." Halloughton voters have always voted withon Southwell West Ward (at Holy Trinity School polling station), the nearest voting station available to them. The proposal that Halloughton should remain withon Southwell Civil Parish and West Ward would retain this. Local access to voting for elected representatives that reflect the reality of electors' life experiences, and the use of services that they rely on, should be maintained. https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2149 05/08/2013 Fuller, Heather From: North Muskham Parish Council <[email protected]> Sent: 02 August 2013 17:54 To: Reviews@ Subject: ELECTORAL REVIEW OF NEWARK & SHERWOOD Attachments: MUSKHAM response re boundary changes- ward contents.xls Importance: High This submission is supported also by the Parish Councils of Bathley, Little Carlton & South Muskham, Cromwell and Norwell We suggest that the submission by Newark and Sherwood District Council, whilst meeting one of the 4 main criteria( the numbers in each ward), it does, in many instances and in particular with the old Muskham Ward parishes and Sutton On Trent parish, not satisfy the other three criteria regarding identity, cohesion, accessibility to services etc . We suggest that the numbers criteria is the lesser of the 4 and should not be the key basis for determination of the ward constituents. Whilst we respect the need to reduce the number of wards and Members, we have therefore amended the Newark and Sherwood proposals and attach an alternative matrix proposal showing ward constituents. We accept there are two wards where the numbers are low in comparison with the other rural parishes but geographically those two areas are large, sparsely populated but highly connected with regards to identity, access to facilities and geographic empathy. We respectfully suggest that “ Localism” is absolutely key in the determination of local boundaries and compilation of wards that influence and direct the quality of life and public service delivery on a much greater scale than just District Council democracy With regards to the Muskham area, the shape of this previous ward we suggest should stay given that: With the exception of Norwell all the parishes are part of the Riverside Church Parishes –COE and have been for hundreds of years Bathley has no community facility and shares the Muskham Rural Community Centre- funded by the Lottery to provide an excellent facility to the parishes within the proposed ward group. Bathley people are baptised and buried and worship at North Muskham All of the villages in our proposed “Muskham” ward share the same threat from Wind Turbine development, gravel extraction and flood risk is a common issue. Issues with congestion in villages when the A1 is blocked are common to all of our proposed ward constituents All of the villages share the gravel; extraction risk, have formed a fighting group which collectively has appointed a legal expert to defend against what we consider to be inappropriate policy of extraction in our area. We are basically a Trent Valley catchment area 1 The garage at North Muskham, the shops at Cromwell, Norwell and North Muskham, the pubs at Norwell, North Muskham and Bathley and at Kelham are commonly frequented by residents of all the proposed ward villages. HGV weight restrictions will soon apply to all villages within our proposed ward One main landowner and farmer operates in all of the 8 villages The natural boundary encompassing the 8 villages is afforded by the River Trent to the east and the Debdale/Norwell hills to the west Jayne Saunders Clerk to North Muskham Parish Council 2 Projected Number of Polling District Parliamentary County Division District Parish/Town 2019 members Ratio Variance Variance % AAAA1 Newark Newark East Beacon Newark Town - Beacon Ward 2491 AAAA2 Newark Newark East
Recommended publications
  • Thoroton Society Publications

    Thoroton Society Publications

    THOROTON SOCIETY Record Series Blagg, T.M. ed., Seventeenth Century Parish Register Transcripts belonging to the peculiar of Southwell, Thoroton Society Record Series, 1 (1903) Leadam, I.S. ed., The Domesday of Inclosures for Nottinghamshire. From the Returns to the Inclosure Commissioners of 1517, in the Public Record Office, Thoroton Society Record Series, 2 (1904) Phillimore, W.P.W. ed., Abstracts of the Inquisitiones Post Mortem relating to Nottinghamshire. Vol. I: Henry VII and Henry VIII, 1485 to 1546, Thoroton Society Record Series, 3 (1905) Standish, J. ed., Abstracts of the Inquisitiones Post Mortem relating to Nottinghamshire. Vol. II: Edward I and Edward II, 1279 to 1321, Thoroton Society Record Series, 4 (1914) Tate, W.E., Parliamentary Land Enclosures in the county of Nottingham during the 18th and 19th Centuries (1743-1868), Thoroton Society Record Series, 5 (1935) Blagg, T.M. ed., Abstracts of the Inquisitiones Post Mortem and other Inquisitions relating to Nottinghamshire. Vol. III: Edward II and Edward III, 1321 to 1350, Thoroton Society Record Series, 6 (1939) Hodgkinson, R.F.B., The Account Books of the Gilds of St. George and St. Mary in the church of St. Peter, Nottingham, Thoroton Society Record Series, 7 (1939) Gray, D. ed., Newstead Priory Cartulary, 1344, and other archives, Thoroton Society Record Series, 8 (1940) Young, E.; Blagg, T.M. ed., A History of Colston Bassett, Nottinghamshire, Thoroton Society Record Series, 9 (1942) Blagg, T.M. ed., Abstracts of the Bonds and Allegations for Marriage Licenses in the Archdeaconry Court of Nottingham, 1754-1770, Thoroton Society Record Series, 10 (1947) Blagg, T.M.
  • Directory of Clubs and Secretaries

    Directory of Clubs and Secretaries

    DIRECTORY OF CLUBS AND SECRETARIES ARNOLD PARK Hon. Sec. Chris Smith 19 Bentley Avenue, Nottingham NG3 7AX 0115 987 3407 E-mail [email protected] Captain Mick Leafe [email protected] 07748 628 402 Green Arnot Hill Park, Nottingham Road, Arnold, Nottingham NG5 6LU ATTENBOROUGH Hon. Sec. Barbara Stratford 24 Hurts Croft, Chilwell, Nottingham NG9 5DE 0115 925 0842 E-mail [email protected] Captain Colin Firbank [email protected] 0115 925 6632 Fixtures Stephen Ward [email protected] 07935 414 518 Green The Strand, Attenborough, Nottingham NG9 6AU BEESTON UNITY Hon. Sec. Malcolm Potter 8 Bishopdale Close, Long Eaton, Nottingham NG10 3PJ 0115 972 3624 E-mail [email protected] 07746 663 063 Green Recreation Ground, Broadgate, Beeston, Nottingham NG9 2DS BLIDWORTH Hon. Sec. Pete Richens 13 Bourne Drive, Ravenshead, Notts NG15 9FN 01623 796632 E-mail [email protected] 07810 555 800 Captain Brian Kay [email protected] 07855 881 046 Green Miners Welfare, Mansfield Road, Blidworth, Notts NG21 0LR BRIERLEY PARK Hon. Sec. Alan Ayre 53 Newcastle Street, Huthwaite, Notts NG17 2LT 01623 558334 E-Mail Danny McCrossan [email protected] Green Manor Park, Ley Lane, Mansfield Woodhouse, Notts NG19 8JU BULWELL FOREST Hon. Sec. Gerry Wilkinson 7 Rise Park Road, Rise Park, Nottingham NG5 5BJ 0115 927 9694 E-mail J Fernley [email protected] 0115 955 0466 Green Bulwell Forest, Hucknall Road, Bulwell, Nottingham NG6 9LQ CAVALIERS Hon. Sec. Frank Wallis 5 Falconers Walk, Arnold, Nottingham NG5 8NY 07971 992 189 E-mail [email protected] Captain David Baird [email protected] 07939 751 101 Green Nottingham University Sports Ground, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2RD CHILWELL Hon.
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire

    Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire

    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire Further electoral review December 2005 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 15 2 Current electoral arrangements 19 3 Submissions received 23 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 25 Electorate figures 26 Council size 26 Electoral equality 27 General analysis 28 Warding arrangements 28 a Clipstone, Edwinstowe and Ollerton wards 29 b Bilsthorpe, Blidworth, Farnsfield and Rainworth wards 30 c Boughton, Caunton and Sutton-on-Trent wards 32 d Collingham & Meering, Muskham and Winthorpe wards 32 e Newark-on-Trent (five wards) 33 f Southwell town (three wards) 35 g Balderton North, Balderton West and Farndon wards 36 h Lowdham and Trent wards 38 Conclusions 39 Parish electoral arrangements 39 5 What happens next? 43 6 Mapping 45 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 47 B Code of practice on written consultation 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
  • Landowner Declaration Register

    Landowner Declaration Register

    Landowner Declaration Register This is maintained under Section 31A of the Highways Act 1980 and Section 15B(1) of the Commons Act 2006. It comprises: Landowner deposit under S.15A(1) of the Commons Act 2006 By depositing a statement, landowners can prevent their land being registered as a Town or Village Green, provided they make the deposit before there has been 20 years recreational use of the land as of right. A new statement must be deposited within 20 years. Landowner deposit under S.31(6) of the Highways Act 1980 Highway statements and highway declarations allow landowners to prevent their land being recorded as a highway on the definitive map on the basis of presumed dedication (usually 20 years uninterrupted use). A highway statement or declaration must be followed by a further declaration within 20 years (or 10 years if lodged prior to 1 October 2013). Last Updated: September 2015 Ref Parish Landowner Details of land Highways Act 1980 CA1 Documents No. Section 31(6) 6 Date of Expiry date initial deposit A1 Alverton M P Langley The Belvedere, Alverton 17/07/2008 17/07/2018 A2 Annesley Multi owners Annesley Estate 30/03/1998 30/03/2004 expired A3 Annesley Notts Wildlife Trust Annesley Woodhouse Quarry 11/07/1997 13/01/2013 expired A4 Annesley Taylor Wimpey UK Little Oak Plantation 11/04/2012 11/04/2022 Ltd A5 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Lodge Farm, off Georgia Avenue 05/01/2009 05/01/2019 A6 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Land off Kenneth Road 05/01/2009 05/01/2019 A7 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Land off Calverton Road 05/11/2008 05/11/2018
  • Area 6 Local Bus Travel Guide for Ollerton, Edwinstowe, Tuxford And

    Area 6 Local Bus Travel Guide for Ollerton, Edwinstowe, Tuxford And

    Area 6 local bus travel guide for Ollerton, Edwinstowe, Tuxford and Sutton on Trent areas August 2014 This leaflet provides a travel map and destination and frequency guide for local bus services in the Ollerton, Edwinstowe, Tuxford and Sutton on Trent area. Full timetables for these services can be obtained from the relevant operators, contact details are shown below. Service Route Days of Early morning Daytime Evening Sundays operation Every Every Every Every 14 Mansfield - Clipstone - Kirton Mon - Sat 60 mins 60 mins 1 journey ---- 15, 15A Mansfield - Clipstone - Walesby Daily 60 mins 60 mins 60 mins 60 mins 31 (TW) Bilsthorpe - Eakring - Ollerton Mon - Sat 1 journey (Mon-Fri) 3 journeys (Tue, Thur & Sat) ---- ---- 1 journey (Mon - Sat) 32 (TW) Ollerton - Kneesall - Newark (Phone a bus*) Mon - Sat 1 journey 60 mins 1 journey ---- 33 (TW) Egmanton - Norwell - Newark Wed & Fri ---- 1 journey ---- ---- 35 (TW) Retford - Elkesley - Walesby - New Ollerton Mon - Sat 2 journeys 2 hours ---- ---- 36 (TW) Retford - Tuxford - Laxton Mon - Sat ---- 2 hours ---- ---- 37, 37A, 37B Newark - Tuxford - Retford Mon - Sat 1 journey 60 mins 1 journey ---- 39, 39B Newark - Sutton-on-Trent - Normanton - (Tuxford 39B) Mon - Sat 1 journey 60 mins ---- ---- 41, 41B (CCVS) Fernwood - Barnby in the Willows - Newark - Bathley - (Cromwell 41B Sat only) Mon - Sat ---- 2 hours ---- ---- 95 Retford - South Leverton - North Wheatley - Gainsborough Mon - Sat ---- 60 mins ---- ---- 190 (GMMN) Retford - Rampton - Darlton (Commuter Link) Mon - Sat 2 journeys 2 journeys
  • 07R Building Better Cmts Appx 2

    07R Building Better Cmts Appx 2

    2005/06 (YEAR 2) - SCHEMES PROGRAMMED Appendix 2 District Member Location Proposed Works Est Cost Status Ash Sutton in Ashfield North Stanton Hill, Meden Bank Street Lighting £15,000.00 Outstanding Hucknall, Johnson Avenue - Ash Hucknall Improvement Scheme £30,000.00 Complete Broomhill Road Hucknall, Broomhill Road- Ash Hucknall Improvement schemes £21,000.00 Complete Brookside Ash Hucknall Hucknall Dob Park Improvements £12,500.00 Ongoing Ash Hucknall Hucknall Farleys Lane £5,000.00 Outstanding Ash Hucknall Hucknall, Annie Holgate School Wildlife Scheme £1,000.00 Outstanding Safer pedestrian crossing points, Ash Sutton in Ashfield East Sutton, Sotheby Road £12,000.00 Complete signs, coloured surfacing Sutton, The Poplars & Peel Surface footways; improvments in Ash Sutton in Ashfield East £12,500.00 Outstanding Street vicinity of community centre Ash Kirkby in Ashfield South Kirkby, Bracken Hill School Wildlife Project £2,000.00 Outstanding Ash Kirkby in Ashfield South Annesley A611 Resurface footway £30,000.00 Complete Kirkby, Fairhaven, Manor Ash Kirkby in Ashfield South Resurface footpaths £64,000.00 Complete Crescent off Kingsway Ash Sutton in Ashfield West Huthwaite, various locations Resurface footways £35,000.00 Complete Ash Sutton in Ashfield West Sutton, Springwood View Close Resurface footpaths £35,000.00 Complete Sutton Landfill Site, Rookery Make public greenspace from Ash Sutton in Ashfield West £100,000.00 Ongoing Park (Flagship) active landfill site Kirkby, Coxmoor Estate,Poplar Ash Sutton in Ashfield West Footway Improvements
  • 18/01258/FUL Proposal: Demolish 2 No. Semi-Detached Properties

    18/01258/FUL Proposal: Demolish 2 No. Semi-Detached Properties

    PLANNING COMMITTEE – 4 SEPTEMBER 2018 Application No: 18/01258/FUL Proposal: Demolish 2 no. semi-detached properties known as 37 and 39 Halloughton Road, Erect 2 no. detached replacement dwellings with garages within the boundaries of the above properties and garden Location: 37 And 39 Halloughton Road Southwell Nottinghamshire NG25 0LP Applicant: Mr D T and Miss P A Orwin Registered: 04.07.2018 Target Date: 29.08.2018 Extension of Time Agreed Until 6th September 2018 This application is being presented to the Planning Committee in line with the Council’s Scheme of Delegation as Southwell Town Council has objected to the application which differs to the professional officer recommendation. The Site The application site relates to a plot of land of approximately 0.22 hecatres in extent which as existing forms the residential curtilages of the dwellings known as 37 and 39 Halloughton Road. The existing properties are a pair of semi-detached single storey bungalows orientated towards the vehicular access which serves the site from Halloughton Road. At the time of the Officer site visit the characteristics of the site vary within the site with the eastern area of the site being less manicured that the land immediately to the rear of the dwellings. The site is within the urban boundary of Southwell as defined by the Proposals Map of the Allocations and Development Management DPD. The site is also within the designated Conservation Area Southwell Protected Views Zone (So/PV). The Potwell Dyke shares the north eastern boundary of the site. There is a public right of way along the vehicular access to the site which then follows the southern boundary of the site.
  • 20/01242/FULM Proposal: Construction of a Solar Farm And

    20/01242/FULM Proposal: Construction of a Solar Farm And

    PLANNING COMMITTEE – 2 MARCH 2021 Application No: 20/01242/FULM Proposal: Construction of a solar farm and battery stations together with all associated works, equipment and necessary infrastructure. Location: Land North Of Halloughton, Southwell Applicant: JBM Solar Projects 6 Ltd Agent: Mr James Walker - Pegasus Group Registered: 10.07.2020 Target Date: 09.10.2020 Extension Agreed to: 02.03.21 Website link: https://publicaccess.newark-sherwooddc.gov.uk/online- applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=QD7J5ALBI8R00 The application is being referred to Planning Committee at the discretion of the Business Manager, as this proposal would be of significance to the district in that it could potentially give rise to significant financial consequences. The Site The application site comprises 13 agricultural fields north of the village of Halloughton. Collectively all parcels of land are c.107.81Ha and given the isolated nature of the site it falls as Open Countryside. The site is gently undulating and rounded, resulting in views being medium to long distance throughout most of the area with frequent wooded skylines. The southern portion of the site is located to the north of and within the parish of Halloughton. This section of the site comprises five large linear fields with boundaries at their edge, including copses at the western and part of the southern boundary. Overhead electricity lines and pylons cross this parcel in an east-west direction. The built-up area of Halloughton lies close to the southern boundary of the parcel and the A612 forms part of the eastern boundary. Agricultural land surrounds the parcel in other directions.
  • DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy

    DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy

    DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy July 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 8 3. Blue-Green Infrastructure Priorities and Principles 18 4. National and Local Planning Policies 23 5. Regional and Local Green Infrastructure Strategies 28 6. Existing Blue-Green Infrastructure Assets 38 7. Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategic Networks 62 8. Ecological Networks 71 9. Synergies between Ecological and the Blue-Green Infrastructure Network 89 Appendix A: BGI Corridor Summaries 92 Appendix B: Biodiversity Connectivity Maps 132 Appendix C: Biodiversity Opportunity Areas 136 Appendix D: Natural Environment Assets 140 Appendix D1: Sites of Special Scientific Interest 141 Appendix D2: Local Nature Reserves 142 Appendix D3: Local Wildlife Sites 145 Appendix D4: Non-Designated 159 1 Appendix E: Recreational Assets 169 Appendix E1: Children’s and Young People’s Play Space 170 Appendix E2: Outdoor Sports Pitches 178 Appendix E3: Parks and Gardens 192 Appendix E4: Allotments 199 Appendix F: Blue Infrastructure 203 Appendix F1: Watercourses 204 2 1. Introduction Objectives of the Strategy 1.1 The Greater Nottingham authorities have determined that a Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) Strategy is required to inform both the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan (Local Plan Part 1) and the development of policies and allocations within it. This strategic plan is being prepared by Broxtowe Borough Council, Gedling Borough Council, Nottingham City Council and Rushcliffe Borough Council. It will also inform the Erewash Local Plan which is being progressed separately. For the purposes of this BGI Strategy the area comprises the administrative areas of: Broxtowe Borough Council; Erewash Borough Council; Gedling Borough Council; Nottingham City Council; and Rushcliffe Borough Council.
  • A Profile of the Economy, Labour Market and Business Structure of Newark and Sherwood

    A Profile of the Economy, Labour Market and Business Structure of Newark and Sherwood

    A Profile of the Economy, Labour Market and NTU Business Structure of Newark and Sherwood A report produced on behalf of the Newark and Sherwood District Council October 2013 A Profile of the Economy, Labour Market and Business Structure of Newark and Sherwood Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 Key Statistics ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Economic and Labour Market Conditions ........................................................................................... 5 2.1 Employment and Unemployment ................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Skills Supply and Demand ........................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Earnings and Commuting ............................................................................................................ 16 3. Business Growth ............................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Enterprise and Business Survival ................................................................................................ 20
  • Notts 1911 - Part 3

    Notts 1911 - Part 3

    Notts 1911 - Part 3 [20] William (1767?-) ,---------- -------,----------------,--------- -------|--------------,----------------,-------------------------------,---------------¬ William Joseph John Francis Benjamin George Henry Robert (1798?-) (1803-65) (1805-) (1807-) (1810-87) (1813-82) (1816-93) (1817-87) dsmp? dsp? ? Notts4 | |-------------¬ dsp | George George Henry |---------------------------------------------,------------------------ ------¬ Charity= Foster (1840-1913) (1844-73) George Henry William #178 (1839-1902) #315 |--------------¬ (1839-1904) (1841-92) (1843-1912) | | George Henry |---------------,---------------¬ |--------------¬ #347 ,---------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------' | (1869-1916) (1871-1929) Charles Ann Ethel William Arthur |---------------,--------------¬ Harry ,---------- -------,-------------------------------,-----------------' #338 #234 (1877-1954) (1877-) (1890-) (1862-1944) (1865-1940) Henry Arthur William (1877-1967) Henry George William ,---------- ------| | #313 #229 #324 #264 #177 (1876-1936) (1877-?) Ernest #243 (1866-1941) (1872-1940) (1873-1923) Elsie Reginald | | | | dsp? #342 (1880-1960) | | #314 #343 (1899-) (1901-36) | George Isabella= Harry | #348 | dsp | | ↓ ↓ #339 | William #226A (1886-1962) |--------------¬ William John |---------------,----------------,---------------¬ ,---------- ------| (1908-58) #236 Christopher Arthur Henry Foster George Frederick Willie Harry John Harry Harry William (1902-74) (1905-69) (1890-1932?) William (1901-) (1906-34) Charles (1901-72)
  • Statement of Consultation

    Statement of Consultation

    REGULATION 30(D) CONSULTATION STATEMENT BASSETLAW CORE STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT POLICIES DPD JANUARY 2011 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. ISSUES AND OPTIONS 3. PREFERRED OPTIONS 4. ONGOING CONSULTATION APPENDICIES A. ISSUES & OPTIONS CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT B. PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT C. LIST OF THOSE BODIES AND PERSONS INVITED TO MAKE REPRESENTATIONS D. LIST OF ADDITIONAL BODIES CONSULTED IN RELATION TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION 1 1. INTRODUCTION This statement has been prepared, in line with regulation 30(d) of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (hereafter ‘the Regulations’) to demonstrate how Bassetlaw District Council has complied with regulation 25. The preparation of the Bassetlaw Core Strategy & Development Management Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) began with the publication of the Issues and Options paper and Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report for a six-week consultation period in September 2009. A second formal six-week consultation period on the Preferred Options and Sustainability Appraisal commenced in May 2010. Finally, the Publication Core Strategy & Development Management Policies DPD, Publication Proposals Map, Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulation Assessment were released for public consideration for six weeks in November 2010. As well as the formal consultation periods, the District Council has consulted with a range of bodies and individuals during the entire period of the DPD’s development, and used a variety of methods in line with the Statement of Community Involvement, to secure feedback from as wide ranging a group as possible. Following the Issues & Options and Preferred Options consultation stages, reports were produced that set out: • which bodies were invited to make representations; • how they were invited to do this; • a summary of the main issues raised; and • how they were taken into account.