Conservation Cases Processed by the Gardens Trust 23.05.2019 Response By
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Statement of Consultation
REGULATION 30(D) CONSULTATION STATEMENT BASSETLAW CORE STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT POLICIES DPD JANUARY 2011 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. ISSUES AND OPTIONS 3. PREFERRED OPTIONS 4. ONGOING CONSULTATION APPENDICIES A. ISSUES & OPTIONS CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT B. PREFERRED OPTIONS CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT C. LIST OF THOSE BODIES AND PERSONS INVITED TO MAKE REPRESENTATIONS D. LIST OF ADDITIONAL BODIES CONSULTED IN RELATION TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION 1 1. INTRODUCTION This statement has been prepared, in line with regulation 30(d) of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (hereafter ‘the Regulations’) to demonstrate how Bassetlaw District Council has complied with regulation 25. The preparation of the Bassetlaw Core Strategy & Development Management Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) began with the publication of the Issues and Options paper and Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report for a six-week consultation period in September 2009. A second formal six-week consultation period on the Preferred Options and Sustainability Appraisal commenced in May 2010. Finally, the Publication Core Strategy & Development Management Policies DPD, Publication Proposals Map, Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulation Assessment were released for public consideration for six weeks in November 2010. As well as the formal consultation periods, the District Council has consulted with a range of bodies and individuals during the entire period of the DPD’s development, and used a variety of methods in line with the Statement of Community Involvement, to secure feedback from as wide ranging a group as possible. Following the Issues & Options and Preferred Options consultation stages, reports were produced that set out: • which bodies were invited to make representations; • how they were invited to do this; • a summary of the main issues raised; and • how they were taken into account. -
Statement of Consultation
Contents Introduction 1 Annex 1: Mansfield District Local Plan - Scoping Report Annex 2: Mansfield District Local Plan - Consultation Draft Annex 3: Mansfield District Local Plan - Preferred Options Mansfield District Local Plan 2013 to 2033 Statement of Consultation 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This statement sets out how the council has involved residents and key stakeholders in preparing the Mansfield District Local Plan 2013 to 2033 in accordance with Regulations 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. 1.2 Consultation on the preparation of the Local Plan has been undertaken in accordance with the relevant Regulations and the adopted Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) (June 2017). The SCI document sets out how the council will consult and involve the public and statutory consultees in planning matters. Full details of the current adopted SCI can be viewed here: http://www.mansfield.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=9459&p=0 Structure of statement 1.3 The statement of consultation comprises three separate annexes dealing with each stage of consultation as follows: Annex 1: Mansfield District Local Plan - Scoping Report: available for public consultation June / July 2015 Annex 2: Mansfield District Local Plan - Consultation Draft: available for public consultation between 11 January and 22 February 2016, and 3 August and 14 September 2016 Annex 3: Mansfield District Local Plan - Preferred Options: available for consultation between 2 October – 10 November 2017 1.4 Each of the annexes explains the methods used, along with who was invited to make representations and how. This is then followed by a summary of the main issues raised by those persons and finally, how those issues have been addressed in the preparation of the Local Plan. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2017, East Midlands
East Midlands Register 2017 HERITAGE AT RISK 2017 / EAST MIDLANDS Contents Heritage at Risk III Northampton 61 South Northamptonshire 61 Wellingborough 65 The Register VII Nottingham, City of (UA) 66 Content and criteria VII Nottinghamshire 68 Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Ashfield 68 Reducing the risks XI Bassetlaw 69 Key statistics XIV Broxtowe 73 Gedling 74 Publications and guidance XV Mansfield 75 Key to the entries XVII Newark and Sherwood 75 Rushcliffe 78 Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Rutland (UA) 79 Derby, City of (UA) 1 Derbyshire 2 Amber Valley 2 Bolsover 4 Chesterfield 5 Derbyshire Dales 6 Erewash 7 High Peak 8 North East Derbyshire 9 Peak District (NP) 10 South Derbyshire 11 Leicester, City of (UA) 14 Leicestershire 17 Charnwood 17 Harborough 19 Hinckley and Bosworth 21 Melton 22 North West Leicestershire 23 Lincolnshire 24 Boston 24 East Lindsey 26 Lincoln 34 North Kesteven 36 South Holland 38 South Kesteven 40 West Lindsey 45 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 50 North Lincolnshire (UA) 52 Northamptonshire 55 Corby 55 Daventry 55 East Northamptonshire 58 Kettering 60 II East Midlands Summary 2017 notable theme for our work in tackling heritage at risk this year has been regeneration and the economic and social benefits it brings. We are excited A about the potential heritage has to improve our lives as demonstrated at Derby and now in Nottingham. And having taken North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire back into the East Midlands last year, I have been delighted that we were able to assist in funding repairs to Victoria Mill, Grimsby. -
P.RIVATE BESIDENTS. WO& .59'7 White Hy.153 Nottingham Rd
:NOTTJ:NGBAMSBIBE I J P.RIVATE BESIDENTS. WO& .59'7 White Hy.153 Nottingham rd. Mansfield Wilkinson Martin, Beechwood, London Wilson William H. Hexgrave park, White John Harrop, Layton Burrow, road, Newark Farnsfield, Southwell 'St. John's place, Mansfield Wilkinson Miss, 78 Portland s·.l\Iansfield Winder R. The Cottage, Blyth,Rotherhm White Joseph, Elmsleigh, 2 Hamilton Wilkinson Mrs.18 Burns street, Nttnghm Windley Rev. Wilson, 14 All Saints' road, Nottingham Wilkinson Mrs. Derby house, North road, Nottingham \Vhlte Miss, New street, Retford road, Park, Nottingham Windley William liLA. Colston Bassett~ White Mrs. Weston, Newark Wilkipson Richard, Magdala mount, Nottingham White Robert, 1 Park place, Worksop Magdala road, Nottingham Winfield A. A. 23 Woodhouse rd.Mansfld White Sampson, Bleasby, Nottingham Wilkinson Thomas Edwin, Holme dene, Winfield Francis, Byron house, Watnall "'lite Samuel, South Leverton, I-incoln Farndon, Newark road, Hucknall Torkard 1\-1ute William, Linby, Nottingham Wilkinson William, Sturton High house, Wing Henry J.P.l2 Park ter.Nottingham Whitehall V. 3 North rd. Park, Nttnghm Sturton-le-Steeple, Retford Wing Henry Robert, Elm cottage, High Whltehead Rev. Fred, 92 Wilford grove, Wilkinson-Smith Mrs. Bunney I•ark, road, Beeston, Nottingham Nottingham . Bunney, Nottingham Wing Miss, 13 Wellington road, Newark Whitehead John, Linden villa, Meadow Willatt J. 4 Pelham road, Nottingham Wing William, Kentmere, Cavendish road, Beeston, Nottingh!tm Willey Major Francis J.P. The Hall, crescent north, Nottingham Whitehead John Ford, Collingwood, Blyth, Rotherham Winnicott William Barrett, 22 Seely Devonshire aven. Beeston, Nttnghm Williams Rev. Benjamin M.A. Rectory, road, Radford, Nottingham 'Whitehead Mrs. Edingley, Soutbwell Bilborough, Nottingham Winser F. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2019, Midlands
Midlands Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / MIDLANDS Contents The Register IV Bassetlaw 73 Broxtowe 77 Content and criteria IV Gedling 78 Key Statistics VI Mansfield 79 Newark and Sherwood 79 Key to the Entries VII Rushcliffe 82 Entries on the Register by local planning IX Rutland (UA) 84 authority Herefordshire, County of (UA) 84 Derby, City of (UA) 1 Shropshire (UA) 95 Derbyshire 2 Amber Valley 2 Staffordshire 111 Bolsover 4 East Staffordshire 111 Chesterfield 5 Lichfield 111 Derbyshire Dales 5 Newcastle-under-Lyme 113 Erewash 7 South Staffordshire 114 High Peak 8 Stafford 115 North East Derbyshire 9 Staffordshire Moorlands 116 Peak District (NP) 10 Tamworth 117 South Derbyshire 10 Stoke-on-Trent, City of (UA) 118 Leicester, City of (UA) 13 Telford and Wrekin (UA) 120 Leicestershire 16 Warwickshire 122 Charnwood 16 North Warwickshire 122 Harborough 18 Nuneaton and Bedworth 125 Hinckley and Bosworth 20 Rugby 125 Melton 21 Stratford-on-Avon 127 North West Leicestershire 25 Warwick 131 Lincolnshire 26 West Midlands 133 Boston 26 Birmingham 133 East Lindsey 28 Coventry 138 Lincoln 36 Dudley 141 North Kesteven 38 Sandwell 143 South Holland 41 Walsall 143 South Kesteven 43 Wolverhampton, City of 145 West Lindsey 48 Worcestershire 147 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 53 Bromsgrove 147 North Lincolnshire (UA) 55 Malvern Hills 148 Northamptonshire 59 Redditch 151 Worcester 151 Corby 59 Wychavon 152 Daventry 59 Wyre Forest 155 East Northamptonshire 62 Kettering 64 Northampton 65 South Northamptonshire 65 Wellingborough 69 Nottingham, City of (UA) 69 Nottinghamshire 72 Ashfield 72 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / MIDLANDS THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. -
Southwell Town Council
Parish and Town Council submissions to the Newark and Sherwood District Council electoral review This PDF contains 18 submissions from parish and town councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission that you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. From: Balderton Parish Council [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 25 July 2013 15:19 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral Review of Newark and Sherwood District Council Dear Sirs, Thank you for notification of the above review. I write on behalf of Balderton Parish Council in response to the consultation of new ward boundaries within Newark & Sherwood District Council. Having reviewed the information members expressed the following concerns and asked that they be submitted: a) Balderton could not afford to lose a District Councillor as it is a very busy, heavily populated village. b) Balderton should retain four District members, particularly with the imminent amount of residential development to take place in the village resulting from the agreed Newark Growth Point. c) The confusion should be removed for parishioners on Staple Lane because one half of the properties along Staple Lane are in Fernwood Ward and one half are in Balderton Ward for County Council purposes, but the whole of Staple Lane residents are included within the Balderton District and Parish Wards. The parish map boundary includes Staple Lane properties, so for the sake of the few houses concerned they should all be included in the County’s Balderton Ward. Thank you, Mrs Cheryl Davison‐Lyth Clerk to Balderton Parish Council 1 From: Catherine Millward Sent: 24 June 2013 12:16 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral review of Newark and Sherwood - Caunton Parish Council response Dear Sirs Caunton Parish Council discussed the electoral review at its meeting on 12 June 2013. -
Street Lighting Appx D
Appendix D Part-Night Lighting - Revised Programme January 2013 County- Electoral Division Parish/Town wide Implementation Dimming Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Bleasby Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Bulcote Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Caythorpe Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Eakring Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Edingley Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Epperstone Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Woodborough Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Farnsfield Feb-13 Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Gonalston (no PC) Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Gunthorpe Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Halam Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Hoveringham Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Kirklington Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Lowdham Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Oxton Newark Farnsfield & Lowdham Thurgarton Newark Blidworth Rainworth Newark Blidworth Lindhurst (no PC) Jul-13 Newark Blidworth Blidworth Newark Rufford Bilsthorpe Newark Rufford Clipstone (also Kings Clipstone) Newark Rufford Edwinstowe Newark Rufford Rufford Sep-13 Newark Ollerton Kirton Newark Ollerton Ollerton and Boughton Newark Ollerton Perlethorpe cum Budby Newark Ollerton Walesby Newark Southwell & Caunton Carlton on Trent Dec-12 Newark Southwell & Caunton Caunton Newark Southwell & Caunton Cromwell Newark Southwell & Caunton Egmanton Newark Southwell & Caunton Grassthorpe (no PC) Newark Southwell & Caunton Halloughton Newark Southwell & Caunton Hockerton Newark Southwell & Caunton Kneesall, Kersall & Ompton Newark Southwell & Caunton Laxton and Moorhouse Oct-13 Newark Southwell & Caunton Maplebeck Newark Southwell & Caunton Norwell Newark -
The London Gazette, 18 January, 1924
600 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 18 JANUARY, 1924. 3. An Area comprising:—: In the administrative county of Derby. (a) The county of Lancaster (including all •The petty sessional divisions of Alfreton county and other boroughs geographically (excluding® its detached part), Wirksworth, situated therein). Ashbourne, Belper, Ilkeston, Appletree (6) The North and East Eidings of Yorkshire, (Sudbury), Eepton, Swadlincote and Derby. including all county and other boroughs In the administrative county of Rutland. geographically situated therein. The parishes of Belton, Eidlington.Leighfield, (c) The West Biding of Yorkshire, including Martinsthorpe, Ounthorpe, Brook, Braunstcn, all county and other boroughs geographically Oakham, Bgleton, Burley, Barleythorpe, situated therein (but excluding the Sedbergh Langham, Whissendine, Ashwell, Cbttesmore, sub-division of the petty sessional division of Barrow, Teigh, Market Overton and Thistleton. Ewecross). (d) The city of York, and the parish of York In the administrative county of Northampton, Castle. The borough of Daventry. (e) In the administrative county of Derby. The petty sessional divisions of Kettering The boroughs of Chesterfield, Buxton and (except the parishes of Gretton, Little Weldon Glossop; and and Great Weldon), Little Bowden, Daventry, Towcester, Brackley, and' Northampton; and The petty sessional divisions of Glossop, Chapel-en-le-Frith (including its detached The parishes of Isham, Orlingbury, Little parts), Buxton, Bakewell (including its de- Harrowden, Great Harrowden, Hardwick, tached parts), Chesterfield and Eckington, and Wellingborough, Wilby, Mears Ashby, Sywell, the detached part of the petty sessional division Earls Barton and Ecton. of Alfreton. In the administrative county of Oxford. (/) In the administrative county of Chester. The borough of Banbury, and The boroughs of Macclesfield, Hyde, Dukin- The parishes of Claydon, Olattercote, field, and Stalybridge. -
Transport and Highways Committee Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 10:30 County Hall , County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 7QP
Transport and Highways Committee Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 10:30 County Hall , County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 7QP AGENDA 1 minutes of the last meeting held on 21 May 2014 3 - 8 2 Apologies for Absence 3 Declarations of Interests by Members and Officers:- (see note below) (a) Disclosable Pecuniary Interests (b) Private Interests (pecuniary and non-pecuniary) 4 Capital Programmes Report 9 - 48 5 Sherwood Energy Village - Proposed Aquisition and Disposal 49 - 52 6 Petitions Responses Report 190614 53 - 58 7 Work Programme 59 - 66 Notes (1) Councillors are advised to contact their Research Officer for details of any Group Meetings which are planned for this meeting. (2) Members of the public wishing to inspect "Background Papers" referred to in the reports on the agenda or Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act should contact:- Page 1 of 66 Customer Services Centre 0300 500 80 80 (3) Persons making a declaration of interest should have regard to the Code of Conduct and the Council’s Procedure Rules. Those declaring must indicate the nature of their interest and the reasons for the declaration. Councillors or Officers requiring clarification on whether to make a declaration of interest are invited to contact David Forster (Tel. 0115 977 3552) or a colleague in Democratic Services prior to the meeting. (4) Councillors are reminded that Committee and Sub-Committee papers, with the exception of those which contain Exempt or Confidential Information, may be recycled. (5) This agenda and its associated reports are available to view -
The London Gazette, 17 August, 1926. 5455
THE LONDON GAZETTE, 17 AUGUST, 1926. 5455 Pariah of Widmerpool:— In the Rural District of Skegby:— Bridge carrying the road from Widmer- Parish of BlidwortH: — pool to Kinoulton over the London Midland Bridge carrying the road from the Mans- and Scottish Railway (Nottingham and field—Farnsfield road to Python Hill over Melton Mowbray). the London Midland and Scottish Railway (Mansfield and Southwell). In the Rural District of Leake:— Parish of East Leake:— Parish of Sookholme:— Bridges carrying Woodgate Road and Bridge carrying Carter Lane over the the road from East Leake to Gotham over Mineral Railway. the London and North Eastern Rail- way:— In the Rural District of Southwell:— Parish of Clipstone: — Parish of Normanton upon Soar: — Bridge carrying the road from Clipstone Bowleys Bridge Butt Lane Bridge— to Warsop over the London and North "Bridges carrying the road from Hathern to Eastern Railway (Chesterfield and .Rempstone over the London Midland and Lincoln). Scottish Railway, and the road from Hathern to Rempstone over the London Parish of Edingley: — and North Eastern Railway. Bridges carrying the roads from E ding- ley to Kirklington and Southwell to Kirk- .Parish of Stanford upon Soar:— lington over the London Midland and Bridge carrying the road from Stanford Scottish Railway (Mansfield and South- upon Soar to Normanton upon Soar over well). the London and North Eastern Railway. Parish of Farnsfield:— .Parish of Sutton Bonington:— Bridge carrying the road over the Bridges carrying the roads from Sutton London Midland and Scottish Railway Bonington to Kingston upon Soar Keg- (Mansfield and Southwell) at Farnsfield worth to West Leake and Hathem to Station. -
NOTTING Hal\!SHIRE. [KELLY18 GAMEKEEPERS Continued
68i G£R NOTTING HAl\!SHIRE. [KELLY18 GAMEKEEPERS continued. Hebden James (to Arthur Robert Gar- Railway & General Engineering Co. Croft William (to Edward Evelyn Har- land esq. J.P.), Welham, Retford Limited, Meadow lane, Nottingham court-Vernon esq. D.L., J.P.), Little Hogbin Herbert {to· \~iscount Galway)., Tangyes Lim. 11 Lower Parliament Gringley, Retford Serlby, Bawtry street,. Nottingham Field Ambrose (to W. Hickson esq)., Johnson George (to Robert Barringer Bevercotes, Ollerton, Newark esq), ChE'Sterfield road, Mansfield GAS ENGINEERS. Goring Henry (to the Duke of Portland), Johnson Jesse (to F. Platt esq. D.L., J.P.), Graham Arthur, The ·Works, Lime The Kennels, Norton Cuckney, Mnsfld Barnby-in-the-Willows, Newark Tree place, Mansfield Grass George (to Earl Manvers D.L., J.P.), Key John (to G. Fowler esq.), Cliff cots. Jenkins W. J. & Co. Lim. Thrumpton. Perlethorpe-cum-Budby, Newark Bagnall rd. Cinder hill, Nottingahm Retford Halford \Villiam (to Captain William Lowe William (to Rev. A. P. Wood- Po.chin Warne~), Wysall, Nottingham house M.A.), Tuxford, Newark GASFITTERS. Harrington Waiter (to the Duke of New- Nicol Robert (to Philo Laos Mills esq. Ball G. & So~, 32 \Yilloughby_ street, castle), Clumber, Worksop D.L., J.P.), Ruddington, Nottingham I,enton, Nottmgham Herod James (to the Right Hon. F. J. S. Nixon Wm. Parkinson (to Frank Hunts- Ball Hy. 21 Eland st. Ba.<>ford, Nottinghm Foljambe), Scofton, Worksop man esq.), West Retford, Retford Bellamy Frdk. 144 Derby rd. Nottinghm Herod William (to Lord Savile c.v.o., Parr Amos (to Earl Manvers D.L., J.P.), Binley Frederick Edward, 65A, Upper D.L., J.P.), Rufford, Newark Holme Pierrepont, Nottingham Parliament street, Nottingham Heslop Robert (to Capt. -
Nottinghamshire. ' [Kelly's Public Establishments
SOUTHWELL, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE. ' [KELLY'S PUBLIC ESTABLISHMENTS. Archdeacons. Assembly Rooms, Market place, Albert Merryfield, propr 1901. Derby, Right Rev. Edward Ash Were D.D. 55 Ash Concert Hall, King street, J olm Craggs, caretaker bourne road, Derby Police Station, Burgage, George Clarke, sergeant & two 1894. Nottingham, Yen. John Gray RichardsoR M.A. The constables ; with one at Farnsfield, one at Eakring & Residence, Southwell one at Bleasby, being a sub-division to Newark: Rector. Fire Engine House, Queen -street. Keys kept at Arthur 1900. Yen. John Gray Richardson M.A. The Residenc~, Butler's, Queen street ; Robert Ellis, supt. & 8 firemen Southwell Freemasons' Lodge (St. Mary's, 2,302), held at the Concert Honorary Canons. Rooms, l\Iarket place, W. J. A. Hill, sec 1885. Norwell, Tertia Pars, Henry Jemson· Tebbutt H.A. Beeford, Driffield SOUTH WELL UNION. 1885. Oxton, Prima Pars, Thomas Skelton B.D. Rectory, Board day, friday, fortnightly, at the Workhouse, at 11 a.Rl. Hickling, Melton Mowbray The Union comprises the following places :-Averham, 1885. Woodborough, Alfred Pavey M.A. West~pe lodge, Bathley, Biisthorpe, Bleasby, Boughton, Bulcote, Carlton Southwell . upon-Trent, Caunton, Caythorpe, Clipstone, Cromwell, 1885. North Muskham, John Joseph Singleton M.A. Vicar Eakring, Edingley, Edwinstowe, Egmanton, Eiston, age, Melbourne, Derby Epperstone, Farnsfield, Fiskerton-cum-Morton, Gonaiston, 1885. Beckingham, William Vineent-Jackson M.A. Bottas- • Grassthorpe, Gunthorpe, Halam, Halloughton, Rocker ford Rectory, Grantham . ton, Holme, Hoveringham, Kelham, Kersall, Kirklington, 1885. North Leverton, John Cooke Massey M.A. Rectory, Xirton or Kirkt.on, Kneesall, Laxton or Lexington, Lowd Risley, Derby ham, Maplebeck, Muskham (North), Muskham (South), 1885.