Tracking Austronesian Expansion Into the Pacific Via the Paper Mulberry Plant Elizabeth A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tracking Austronesian Expansion Into the Pacific Via the Paper Mulberry Plant Elizabeth A COMMENTARY Tracking Austronesian expansion into the Pacific via the paper mulberry plant Elizabeth A. Matisoo-Smitha,b,1 banana, taro, breadfruit, and sugarcane, have aDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; and bAllan Near Oceanic origins, whereas the sweet potato Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, and the bottle gourd are of South American New Zealand origin. Thus, the results presented by Chang et al. (6), indicating that the most common variant of paper mulberry found in the Pacific, One of the strategies the ancestors of Pacific with the Lapita Cultural Complex (1). The and the one most likely introduced by the early peoples used for successful settlement of the Lapita culture first appears in the Bismarck colonists, has a clear Taiwanese origin, are sig- islands of the Pacific Ocean was the concept Archipelago some 3400 years before present nificant, providing (to my knowledge) the first of transported landscapes (1). Pacific peoples (BP) and rapidly spreads into the previously direct genetic link between Taiwan and one of carried their culturally and economically im- uninhabited islands of Remote Oceania, the Pacific commensal species. portant plants and animals in their coloniz- reaching Tonga and Samoa, on the edge of Native to Asia, including Taiwan, paper ing canoes and introduced these species to thePolynesianTrianglebyabout2900BP(7). mulberry is a dioecious plant (plants are the islands they settled, which were relatively It is generally accepted that the Lapita culture either male or female) that gets its common impoverished in terms of terrestrial re- is an extension of the Neolithic expansion sources. It has been demonstrated that of Austronesian-speaking peoples through namefromthefactthatitwasusedinChina phylogeographic analyses of these plants and Island Southeast Asia, from the Austronesian and Japan to make paper. In the Pacific, animals can serve as proxies for reconstructing homeland in Taiwan (8–11). Migration to and paper mulberry was an extremely important the pathways of colonizing canoes, and thus settlement of the rest of the Polynesian Tri- plant used for producing barkcloth or tapa, trace the movement of Pacific peoples and angle did not begin until some 1,700 years which was not only used for clothing, but for identify their likely origins. This “commensal after the colonization of Samoa and Tonga, ceremonial artifacts and as an important approach” to tracking the movement of pre- with settlement of Aotearoa/New Zealand indicator of wealth in gift exchange, still seen historic Pacific peoples has to date focused around 730 BP, marking the end of Austro- today in places like Tonga. Tapa production primarily on the animals transported by Pa- nesian expansion into the Pacific (Fig. 1). Al- diminished in many Pacific cultures with the cific colonists, including the Pacific rat (2, 3), though Taiwan has been identified as the introduction of European woven cloth, and pigs (4), and chickens (5). In PNAS, Chang homeland of the Austronesian languages, all as a result, so did the cultivation of paper et al. (6) now present genetic analyses of one previous commensal animal studies indicate mulberry. Barkcloth is produced by beating of the important plant species carried into origins and migration pathways that do not the inner bark of various trees, but most and across the Pacific in colonizing canoes, include Taiwan, suggesting a complex history commonly the paper mulberry, into a thin, with their study of the paper mulberry forthevariouscomponentsofAustronesian pliable, felt-like fabric. Evidence of wooden (Broussonetia papyrifera). and Lapita cultures. Most of the economically tapa beaters have been found in an early, The settlement of the Remote Pacific has important plant species introduced to Remote waterlogged site in East Polynesia, indicating been associated and identified archaeologically Oceanic islands during prehistory, such as it was clearly important for the first colonists (12). These artifacts link the tradition to early Austronesian cultures in Island Southeast Asia and on the mainland, where the earliest stone barkcloth beater has been found in Guangxi, Southern China, and dates to around 8000 BP (13). To identify the geographic origins of paper mulberry and reconstruct its spread through Island Southeast Asia and into the Pacific, Chang et al. (6) studied genetic variation in a 1,233-bp region of the chloroplast DNA Author contributions: E.A.M.-S. wrote the paper. Conflict of interest statement: E.A.M.-S. was a principal investigator (PI) on a project with Dr. Andrea Seelenfreund. The Marsden grant was awarded to E.A.M.-S. in 2009 and ran through 2012. E.A.M.-S. was the identified PI, and Dr. Andrea Seelenfreund was an associate investigator. The project was for archaeological investigations and DNA analyses of human remains from Isla Mocha, Chile. Fig. 1. Map showing the direction of Austronesian expansion from Taiwan and likely timing of expansion into the Pacific. Dates are expressed in years before present (BP) and are based on current archaeological evidence. The dotted See companion article on page 13537. line separates Near Oceania and Remote Oceania. Adapted from ref. 20, with permission from Elsevier. 1Email: [email protected]. 13432–13433 | PNAS | November 3, 2015 | vol. 112 | no. 44 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1518576112 Downloaded by guest on September 23, 2021 (cpDNA), which, like mtDNA in humans, is the distribution of this haplotype would introduction history is indicated for Near COMMENTARY maternally inherited. A total of 604 samples be totally consistent with the expansion of Oceania, and further sampling in both Near of paper mulberry were collected from south Austronesian languages. Oceania, particularly locations in the Bismarck China, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Japan, The fact that a single haplotype, cp-17, is Archipelago (locations with evidence of Lapita Taiwan, the Philippines, Sulawesi, the Solomon dominant across the vast region of Polynesia settlement) and investigations into the distri- Islands, Fiji, and several islands in Polynesia. is consistent with suggestions that Polynesian bution and genetic origins of paper mulberry After sequencing, a total of 48 haplotypes, varieties consist of only male plants that are plants in Vanuatu and New Caledonia will be or distinct lineages, were identified, 31 of clonally propagated (14, 15) and strongly most interesting. Such information would which were shared. One haplotype, desig- supports that they did not disperse naturally help to determine whether paper mulberry nated cp-20, was found throughout the na- was likely introduced by Lapita colonists tive range (southern China, Taiwan, Chang et al. now pre- or if the introduction of cp-17 to Polynesia Vietnam, Cambodia, and Thailand) and was sent genetic analyses of may have been the result of a post-Lapita identified as the likely ancestral type. As might introduction possibly directly from cp-17 be expected, samples collected in this native one of the important harboring locations in Island Southeast Asia range also showed the greatest cpDNA var- plant species carried (either Taiwan or Sulawesi) or via Micronesia iation, with 27 haplotypes identified from into and across the (16). Previous studies of commensal species China, 20 of which were exclusively found such as the Pacific rat (17) and Pacific dogs there. Another five haplotypes were found Pacific in colonizing (18) have demonstrated the need for specific, in Indochina (Vietnam, Cambodia, and canoes, with their study targeted sampling and full analysis of archae- Thailand). Interestingly, the comparatively of the paper mulberry. ological dates and distributions of commensal small island of Taiwan harbored 19 haplo- species that can reveal erroneous assump- types, 16 of which were endemic. but were transported intentionally by hu- tions and errors in our interpretations of The Taiwanese samples showed surprising mans. This form of propagation may also phylogeographic patterns and reconstruc- geographic structuring, with different lineages explain the possible loss of the species in tions of prehistoric human dispersals in the found in the north, the east, and southern/ particular locations when barkcloth manu- Pacific made based on limited sampling. The central parts of the island. The haplotypes facture is abandoned. application of ancient DNA methods to iden- found in the north of the island, particularly Chang et al. (6) have contributed signifi- tify the haplotypes in pre-European samples cp-1, were shared with samples from the east cantly to our understanding of Neolithic ex- and artifacts made of tapa (19) will also assist coast region of the mainland of China, and pansions from the mainland of China to in clarifying or confirming these interpreta- were believed to have been introduced from Taiwan and the subsequent Austronesian mi- tions from modern and historic samples and there during the early phase of Austronesian grations through Island Southeast Asia and present exciting opportunities. expansions to the island dating between 8000 into the Pacific. The clear Taiwanese origins and 6000 BP (6). These northern varieties of cp-17, the likely lineage introduced to ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. I thank Dr. Ceridwen Fraser, Australian National University, for the base map used in were not introduced further south, where Polynesia by early Polynesian colonists, Fig. 1, which was modified by Robbie McFee from the the endemic Taiwanese lineages are found. is most exciting. A much more complex Department of Anatomy, University of Otago. The most common variant found in the Pacific, cp-17, has a clear south/central Taiwanese origin. Haplotype cp-17 is the 1 Kirch PV (2000) On the Road of the Winds: An Archaeological 11 Gray RD, Drummond AJ, Greenhill SJ (2009) Language only lineage found in Sulawesi, Fiji, and in all History of the Pacific Islands before European Contact (Univ of phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. of the Polynesian Islands sampled (Samoa, California Press, Berkeley, CA). Science 323(5913):479–483. 2 Matisoo-Smith E, et al.
Recommended publications
  • The Archaeology of Lapita Dispersal in Oceania
    The archaeology of Lapita dispersal in Oceania pers from the Fourth Lapita Conference, June 2000, Canberra, Australia / Terra Australis reports the results of archaeological and related research within the south and east of Asia, though mainly Australia, New Guinea and Island Melanesia — lands that remained terra australis incognita to generations of prehistorians. Its subject is the settlement of the diverse environments in this isolated quarter of the globe by peoples who have maintained their discrete and traditional ways of life into the recent recorded or remembered past and at times into the observable present. Since the beginning of the series, the basic colour on the spine and cover has distinguished the regional distribution of topics, as follows: ochre for Australia, green for New Guinea, red for Southeast Asia and blue for the Pacific islands. From 2001, issues with a gold spine will include conference proceedings, edited papers, and monographs which in topic or desired format do not fit easily within the original arrangements. All volumes are numbered within the same series. List of volumes in Terra Australis Volume 1: Burrill Lake and Currarong: coastal sites in southern New South Wales. R.J. Lampert (1971) Volume 2: Ol Tumbuna: archaeological excavations in the eastern central Highlands, Papua New Guinea. J.P. White (1972) Volume 3: New Guinea Stone Age Trade: the geography and ecology of traffic in the interior. I. Hughes (1977) Volume 4: Recent Prehistory in Southeast Papua. B. Egloff (1979) Volume 5: The Great Kartan Mystery. R. Lampert (1981) Volume 6: Early Man in North Queensland: art and archeaology in the Laura area.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing the Maritime Domain: U.S
    National Security Journal Published by: Centre for Defence http://nationalsecurityjournal.nz and Security Studies, Massey University ISSN: 2703-1926 (print) ISSN: 2703-1934 (online) Securing the Maritime Domain: U.S. and New Zealand in a Bordered Pacific Author: Nicklin, Germana To cite this article: Nicklin, G. (2021). Securing the Maritime Domain: U.S. and New Zealand in a Bordered Pacific. National Security Journal, 3(2). doi: 10.36878/nsj20210317.03 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.36878/nsj20210317.03 View CrossRef data: https://search.crossref.org/?q=10.36878%2Fnsj20210317.03 Journal Article published 17 March 2021 in National Security Journal. SECURING THE MARITIME DOMAIN: U.S. AND NEW ZEALAND IN A BORDERED PACIFIC Germana Nicklin1 Maritime security in the Pacific differs according to whose security is under threat and in what geographical location. Like the fluidity of the ocean, maritime secu- rity is dynamic involving multiple interests. But the Pacific is also a very bordered space. Drawing on a December 2019 study tour of US defence facilities in Hawai’i, this article addresses the question “How are United States (US) and New Zealand maritime security interests bordered in the Pacific and what are the implications?” First, the article situates maritime security within state territoriality and defence of borders. It then examines the Pacific Ocean as a bordered space, and sketches US and New Zealand interests within it, including differentiating Indo-Pacific from Pacific. Next, each country’s means of securing their maritime domains in the Pacific is explicated, the arenas of cooperation and gaps in knowledge worth re- searching further.
    [Show full text]
  • And Taewa Māori (Solanum Tuberosum) to Aotearoa/New Zealand
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Traditional Knowledge Systems and Crops: Case Studies on the Introduction of Kūmara (Ipomoea batatas) and Taewa Māori (Solanum tuberosum) to Aotearoa/New Zealand A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of AgriScience in Horticultural Science at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand Rodrigo Estrada de la Cerda 2015 Kūmara and Taewa Māori, Ōhakea, New Zealand i Abstract Kūmara (Ipomoea batatas) and taewa Māori, or Māori potato (Solanum tuberosum), are arguably the most important Māori traditional crops. Over many centuries, Māori have developed a very intimate relationship to kūmara, and later with taewa, in order to ensure the survival of their people. There are extensive examples of traditional knowledge aligned to kūmara and taewa that strengthen the relationship to the people and acknowledge that relationship as central to the human and crop dispersal from different locations, eventually to Aotearoa / New Zealand. This project looked at the diverse knowledge systems that exist relative to the relationship of Māori to these two food crops; kūmara and taewa. A mixed methodology was applied and information gained from diverse sources including scientific publications, literature in Spanish and English, and Andean, Pacific and Māori traditional knowledge. The evidence on the introduction of kūmara to Aotearoa/New Zealand by Māori is indisputable. Mātauranga Māori confirms the association of kūmara as important cargo for the tribes involved, even detailing the purpose for some of the voyages.
    [Show full text]
  • Polynesian Voyaging Society COPYRIGHT APPROVALS
    OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS DRAFT AND PENDING ANY OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS PHOTO Polynesian Voyaging Society COPYRIGHT APPROVALS. Paia Kāne Program Improvement Section Office of Hawaiian Affairs 560 North Nimitz Highway, Suite 200 Honolulu, HI 96817 www.oha.org OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS DRAFT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PENDING ANY Contents Over 40 years ago, a small group of visionaries, Herb Kane, Tommy Holmes, and Ben Finney, founded the Polynesian Voyaging Society (PVS), thus putting their dreams PHOTOinto motion begin- Executive Summary 2 ning with the Höküle`a , a double-hull canoe which eventually evolved into an internationally recognized symbol of Hawaiian culture and a reconnection to ancestral landsCOPYRIGHT via sailing voyages Introduction 4 to Polynesia. Purpose 4 The Polynesian Voyaging Society reintroduced the lost art of wayfinding byAPPROVALS. embarking on a series of long distance voyages starting with the construction of double hull ocean voyaging Scope 4 canoes. In 1975, the Höküle`a was built followed a few years later by the Hawai`iloa, and the Hikianalia in 2012. Polynesian Voyaging Society 5 Höküle`a as drawn worldwide attention since its voyage of rediscovery in 1976, retracing the routes of settlement used by Polynesian ancestors. Today, Höküle`a and its sister ship, Hikiana- OHA Sponsorship 5 lia, have chosen to not only promote Hawaiian culture, but to draw attention to the modern day problems that plague our Island Earth. Prelude to WWV 6 Their 2013 worldwide voyage is named Mälama Honua (Care for the Earth) and will cover a Funding 7 four-year span beginning with a training voyage around the Hawaiian Islands called Mälama Hawai`i with scheduled stops at 32 locations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canoe Is the People LEARNER's TEXT
    The Canoe Is The People LEARNER’S TEXT United Nations Local and Indigenous Educational, Scientific and Knowledge Systems Cultural Organization Learnerstxtfinal_C5.indd 1 14/11/2013 11:28 The Canoe Is the People educational Resource Pack: Learner’s Text The Resource Pack also includes: Teacher’s Manual, CD–ROM and Poster. Produced by the Local and Indigenous Knowledge Systems (LINKS) Programme, UNESCO www.unesco.org/links Published in 2013 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France ©2013 UNESCO All rights reserved The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Coordinated by Douglas Nakashima, Head, LINKS Programme, UNESCO Author Gillian O’Connell Printed by UNESCO Printed in France Contact: Douglas Nakashima LINKS Programme UNESCO [email protected] 2 The Canoe Is the People: Indigenous Navigation in the Pacific Learnerstxtfinal_C5.indd 2 14/11/2013 11:28 contents learner’s SECTIONTEXT 3 The Canoe Is the People: Indigenous Navigation in the Pacific Learnerstxtfinal_C5.indd 3 14/11/2013 11:28 Acknowledgements The Canoe Is the People Resource Pack has benefited from the collaborative efforts of a large number of people and institutions who have each contributed to shaping the final product.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Holocene Human Expansion Into Near and Remote Oceania: a Bayesian Model of the Chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck Archipelago
    The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology ISSN: 1556-4894 (Print) 1556-1828 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uica20 Late Holocene Human Expansion into Near and Remote Oceania: A Bayesian Model of the Chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck Archipelago Timothy M. Rieth & J. Stephen Athens To cite this article: Timothy M. Rieth & J. Stephen Athens (2017): Late Holocene Human Expansion into Near and Remote Oceania: A Bayesian Model of the Chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck Archipelago, The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, DOI: 10.1080/15564894.2017.1331939 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2017.1331939 View supplementary material Published online: 07 Jun 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uica20 Download by: [66.66.217.214] Date: 07 June 2017, At: 09:52 The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 0:1–12, 2017 Copyright C Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1556-4894 print / 1556-1828 online DOI: 10.1080/15564894.2017.1331939 Late Holocene Human Expansion into Near and Remote Oceania: A Bayesian Model of the Chronologies of the Mariana Islands and Bismarck Archipelago Timothy M. Rieth and J. Stephen Athens International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ABSTRACT Since the investigations of Spoehr in the 1950s, most researchers have accepted a date of ∼3500 BP/1500 BC for the initial human settle- ment of the Mariana Islands in the western Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary on "Diffusionists" and Legitimate Aims in Polynesian Prehistory
    Commentary On "Diffusionists" and Legitimate Aims in Polynesian Prehistory Received 6July 1983 PETER BELLWOOD RECENTLY had the rather unpleasant experience ofreading Alan Howard's review (AP 22: 221-228) of The Prehistory of Polynesia, edited by Jesse Jennings. A number of I contributors to this volume, including myself, are described in this review in a seemingly derogatory fashion as "diffusionists;' partly I suspect because our papers have not been centrally concerned with Howard's "game;' i.e. with the relationships between ecology and cultural adaptation in Polynesian prehistory, or, as Howard phrases it, with "the relative contributions of cultural templates and ecological constraints to various social developments." I wish to take issue with Howard's stance on two accounts; the first concerns the correct use ofthe emotion-charged term "diffusionist," and the second concerns Howard's appar­ ent refusal to consider, as valid fields ofconcern for prehistorians, any approaches which do not fall within the rules ofthe above "game;' which he, as a social anthropologist, evi­ dently considers to be "so much damn fun." In connection with the first issue, the term "diffusion;' as used in the archaeological lit­ erature with which I am familiar, refers to a process ofconsiderable conceptual vagueness by which particular cultural traits or trait-combinations spread from one area to another. Usually in the Polynesian archaeological literature these traits emerge as various items of material culture, such as adze types, art styles, crops, domestic animals, and so forth. Such diffusion, in the few cases where it can actually be demonstrated to have occurred (and where inheritance from a common ancestor or local convergent adaptation can be ruled out as explanations for similarities), mayor may not involve human migration, and other nonmigratory processes such as trade or simple voyaging contact between neighboring Peter Bellwood is a member ofthe Department ofPrehistory and Anthropology, School ofGeneral Studies, the Australian National University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bioarchaeology of Initial Human Settlement in Palau
    THE BIOARCHAEOLOGY OF INITIAL HUMAN SETTLEMENT IN PALAU, WESTERN MICRONESIA by JESSICA H. STONE A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Anthropology and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Jessica H. Stone Title: The Bioarchaeology of Initial Human Settlement in Palau, Western Micronesia This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Anthropology by: Scott M. Fitzpatrick Chairperson Nelson Ting Core Member Dennis H. O’Rourke Core Member Stephen R. Frost Core Member James Watkins Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2020 ii © 2020 Jessica H. Stone iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Jessica H. Stone Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology June 2020 Title: The Bioarchaeology of Initial Human Settlement in Palau, Western Micronesia The initial settlement of Remote Oceania represents the world’s last major wave of human dispersal. While transdisciplinary models involving linguistic, archaeological, and biological data have been utilized in the Pacific to develop basic chronologies and trajectories of initial human settlement, a number of elusive gaps remain in our understanding of the region’s colonization history. This is especially true in Micronesia, where a paucity of human skeletal material dating to the earliest periods of settlement have hindered biological contributions to colonization models. The Chelechol ra Orrak site in Palau, western Micronesia, contains the largest and oldest human skeletal assemblage in the region, and is one of only two known sites that represent some of the earliest settlers in the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Australia and Oceania – Main Characteristics Australia
    13. Australia and Oceania – main characteristics Australia Location = island continent, between the Indian and South Pacific oceans, SE of Asia and forming, with the nearby island of Tasmania, the Commonwealth of Australia, a self-governing member of the Commonwealth of Nations. Boundaries ° N = Timor Sea, Arafura Sea and Torres Strait ° E = Coral Sea and Tasman Sea ° S = Bass Strait and the Indian Ocean ° W = Indian Ocean The Commonwealth of Australia extends about 4,000 km from Cape Byron in the east to Western Australia, and about 3,700 km from Cape York in the north to Tasmania in the south. Its coastline measures some 36,735 km. Total area: 7,614,500 km2 (continent alone) or 7,682,300 km2 (including Tasmania) => the smallest continent and one of the largest countries in the world Figure 1: Australia = made up of 6 states and 2 territories: • New South Wales • Queensland • South Australia • Tasmania • Victoria • Western Australia • Australian Capital Territory • Northern Territory Australia’s external dependencies are e.g. Christmas Island, the Cocos Islands, Norfolk Island and the Coral Sea Islands Territory Capital: Canberra Oceania Micronesia = one of the three major ethnogeographic subdivisions of Oceania, encompassing (involving) the islands of the Pacific Ocean east of the Philippines and north of the equator. It comprises (includes) more than 2,000 islands, e.g. Northern Mariana Islands, the Palau Islands, the Marshall Islands, Kiribati, Nauru, Guam, and the Federated States of Micronesia. Guam is the largest of the islands with an area of 559 km2 most of the others are small atolls (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeobotanical Approaches in the Study of Food Production in Remote Oceania
    Short Topical Reviews Archaeobotanical Approaches in the Study of Food Production in Remote Oceania Maureece J. Levin1* 1Archaeology Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. *[email protected] Abstract This short topical review discusses recent archaeobotanical approaches to understanding food production in Remote Oceania (eastern Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia). The region presents some preservation and interpretative challenges, both due to the lack of cereal crops and the hot and humid climate that prevails through much of the area. Nevertheless, archaeobotanical analyses provide insight into topics such the transport of crops between islands and anthropogenic environmental change. Received January 27, 2017 OPEN ACCESS Accepted July 11, 2017 DOI 10.14237/ebl.8.1.2017.882 Keywords Archaeobotany, Archaeology, Pacific Islands, Agriculture, Food production, Remote Oceania Copyright © 2017 by the author(s); licensee Society of Ethnobiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction more, there has been a florescence of research in the Food production is a major topic of archaeological field over the past 25 years since Hather’s (1992) and anthropological research in the region known as review of the topic. This short review introduces the Remote Pacific (eastern Melanesia, Micronesia, some recent research and explores issues specific to and Polynesia). This region encompasses a diversity conducting archaeobotanical research in Remote of agricultural systems adapted to volcanic (high) Oceania.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Turnover in Remote Oceania Shortly After Initial Settlement 2
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/268037; this version posted February 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Population Turnover in Remote Oceania Shortly After Initial Settlement 2 3 Mark Lipson1,†, Pontus Skoglund1,2,†, Matthew Spriggs3,4, Frederique Valentin5, Stuart Bedford4,6, 4 Richard Shing4, Hallie Buckley7, Iarawai Phillip4, Graeme K. Ward6, Swapan Mallick1,8,9, Nadin 5 Rohland1, Nasreen Broomandkhoshbacht1,8, Olivia Cheronet10,11, Matthew Ferry1,8, Thomas K. 6 Harper12, Megan Michel1,8, Jonas Oppenheimer1,8, Kendra Sirak11,13, Kristin Stewardson1,8, Kathryn 7 Auckland14, Adrian V.S. Hill14, Kathryn Maitland15, Stephen J. Oppenheimer16, Tom Parks14, 8 Kathryn Robson17, Thomas N. Williams15, Douglas J. Kennett12, Alexander J. Mentzer14, Ron 9 Pinhasi10,11,* and David Reich1,8,9,18,* 10 11 1 Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 12 2 The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom 13 3 School of Archaeology and Anthropology, College of Arts and Social Sciences, The Australian 14 National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia 15 4 Vanuatu National Museum, Vanuatu Cultural Centre, Port Vila, Vanuatu 16 5 Maison de l’Archéologie et de l’Ethnologie, CNRS, UMR 7041, 92023 Nanterre, France 17 6 Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia-Pacific,
    [Show full text]
  • Early Settlement Ofrapa Nui (Easter Island)
    Early Settlement ofRapa Nui (Easter Island) HELENE MARTINSSON-WALLIN AND SUSAN J. CROCKFORD RAPA NUl, THE SMALL REMOTE ISLAND that constitutes the easternmost corner of the Polynesian triangle, was found and populated long before the Europeans "discovered" this part ofthe world in 1722. The long-standing questions concern­ ing this remarkable island are: who were the first to populate the island, at what time was it populated, and did the Rapa Nui population and development on the island result from a single voyage? Over the years there has been much discussion, speculation, and new scientific results concerning these questions. This has resulted in several conferences and numerous scientific and popular papers and monographs. The aim ofthis paper is to present the contemporary views on these issues, drawn from the results of the last 45 years of archaeological research on the island (Fig. 1), and to describe recent fieldwork that Martinsson-Wallin completed on Rapa Nui. Results from the Norwegian Archaeological Expedition to Rapa Nui in 1955­ 1956 suggest that the island was populated as early as c. A.D. 400 (Heyerdahl and Ferdon 1961: 395). This conclusion was drawn from a single radiocarbon date. This dated carbon sample (K-502) was found in association with the so-called Poike ditch on the east side of the island. The sample derived from a carbon con­ centration on the natural surface, which had been covered by soil when the ditch was dug. The investigator writes the following: There is no evidence to indicate that the fire from which the carbon was derived actually burned at the spot where the charcoal occurred, but it is clear that it was on the surface of the ground at the time the first loads of earth were carried out of the ditch and deposited over it.
    [Show full text]