DOCSLIB.ORG

Flow of the Colorado River and Other Western Boundary Streams And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WESTERN WATER BULLETIN 2004 Flow of The Colorado River and other Western Boundary Streams and Related Data INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION UNITED STATES AND MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF STATE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2004 WESTERN BOUNDARY WATER BULLETIN - 2004 - INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION CONTENTS Foreword and Acknowledgments . 4 General Hydrologic Conditions for 2004 . 6 Map of Western Boundary - Douglas, Arizona to Pacific Ocean . 44 I - COLORADO RIVER - IMPERIAL DAM TO GULF OF CALIFORNIA Map of Lower Colorado River, United States and Mexico . Inside Back Cover QUANTITY OF WATER Emergency Deliveries of Colorado River Water For Use In Tijuana, Baja California . 8 Stream-Flow and Stage Records Tributary - Reservation Main Drain No. 4 (California Drain) . 9 Yuma Main Canal Wasteway to Colorado River at Yuma, Arizona . 10 Colorado River below Yuma Main Canal Wasteway at Yuma, Arizona - Discharges . 11 below Yuma Main Canal Wasteway at Yuma, Arizona - Stages . 12 Tributary - Yuma Mesa Outlet Drain to Colorado River near Yuma, Arizona . 13 Drain No. 8-B (Araz Drain) . 14 Pilot Knob Power Plant and Wasteway near Pilot Knob, California . 15 Colorado River at Northerly International Boundary - Discharges . 16 at Northerly International Boundary - Stages . 17 Tributary - Cooper Wasteway (Valley Division, Yuma Project) . 18 Colorado River immediately above Morelos Dam - Stages . 19 Diversions from the Colorado River - Intake Canal at Morelos Diversion Structure - Discharges . 20 at Morelos Diversion Structure - Stages . 21 Colorado River immediately below Morelos Dam - Stages . 22 Tributary - Wellton-Mohawk Drainage Water Discharged to Colorado River below Morelos Dam . 23 Tributary - Eleven Mile Wasteway (Valley Division, Yuma Project) . 24 Colorado River at Eleven Mile Gage - Stages . 25 Tributary - Twenty-one Mile Wasteway (Valley Division, Yuma Project) . 26 East Main Canal Wasteway (Valley Division, Yuma Project) . 27 Yuma Main Drain (Valley Division, Yuma Project) . 28 Diversion Channel at Southerly International Boundary . 29 West Main Canal Wasteway (Valley Division, Yuma Project) . 30 242 Well Field near San Luis, Arizona . 31 Total Flows Crossing International Boundary into Mexico near San Luis, Sonora . 32 Colorado River at Southerly International Boundary - Discharges . 33 at Southerly International Boundary - Stages . 34 Wellton-Mohawk Bypass Drain at Southerly International Boundary . 35 Tributary - Wasteway to Colorado River at Kilometer 27 in Mexico . 36 Tributary - Wasteway to Colorado River at Kilometer 38 in Mexico . 37 Stored Water in Large Reservoirs of the Colorado River . 38 QUALITY OF WATER Suspended Silt in the Colorado River and Intake Canal at Morelos Diversion Structure . 39 Chemical Analyses of Water Samples . 40 Specific Conductance of Water Samples . 41 CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA AND IRRIGATED AREAS Rainfall on the Colorado River Watershed . 43 Location of Rainfall Stations on the Colorado River . 46 Evaporation in the Colorado River Basin . 47 Temperature in the Colorado River Basin . 48 Irrigated Areas along the Colorado River below Imperial Dam . 50 II - ALAMO AND NEW RIVERS QUANTITY OF WATER Stream-Flow and Stage Records Alamo River at International Boundary . 51 New River at International Boundary . 52 Tributary - Wastes from Mexicali Potable Water Plant to New River in Mexico . 53 Waste Waters from Mexican System of Canals Entering the United States . 54 Salton Sea - Elevations of Water Surface . 55 WESTERN BOUNDARY WATER BULLETIN - 2004 - INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION CONTENTS QUALITY OF WATER Chemical Analyses of Water Samples . 56 III - TIJUANA RIVER Map of Tijuana River Drainage Basin . 59 QUANTITY OF WATER Stream-Flow Records Cottonwood Creek above Morena Dam, California . 60 below Morena Dam, California . 61 above Barrett Dam, California . 62 Diversions from Cottonwood Creek - Dulzura Conduit below Barrett Dam, California . 63 Cottonwood Creek below Barrett Dam, California . 64 above Tecate Creek near Dulzura, California . 65 Tributary - Campo Creek near Campo, California . 66 Inflows to Rodriguez Reservoir, Baja California . 67 Diversions from Rodriguez Reservoir, Baja California . 68 Tijuana River at International Boundary . 69 Stored Water in Reservoirs, Tijuana River Basin . 70 CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA AND DRAINAGE BASIN AND IRRIGATED AREAS Rainfall on the Tijuana River Watershed . 71 Location of Rainfall Stations on the Tijuana River Watershed . 73 Evaporation in the Tijuana River Basin . 74 Temperature in the Tijuana River Basin . 75 Drainage Areas above Gaging Stations and Irrigated Areas along Tijuana River and Tributaries . 76 IV - WHITEWATER DRAW, SAN PEDRO, AND SANTA CRUZ RIVERS Map of Western Boundary - Santa Cruz River, San Pedro River, and Whitewater Draw Basins . 77 QUANTITY OF WATER Stream-Flow Records Whitewater Draw near Douglas, Arizona . 78 Sewage Influent, Douglas, Arizona International Treatment Plant . 79 San Pedro River at Palominas, Arizona . 80 Santa Cruz River near Lochiel, Arizona . 81 near Nogales, Arizona . 82 Sewage Influent, Nogales International Treatment Plant . 83 CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Rainfall and Location of Rainfall Stations on the Santa Cruz River Watershed . 84 Temperature in the Santa Cruz River Basin . 85 Drainage Areas above Gaging Stations and Irrigated Areas along Santa Cruz River, San Pedro River, and Whitewater Draw . 86 Corrections to Previous Water Bulletins . 87 WESTERN BOUNDARY WATER BULLETIN - 2004 - INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION FOREWORD This bulletin is the forty-fifth annual compilation of stream discharges and other h ydrographic data relating to international aspects of the Colorado River below Imperial Dam, the Tijuana River, and other streams crossing the western land boundary of the United States and Mexico. The compilation was prepared jointly by the United States and Mexican Sections of the International Boundary and Water Commission, solely for the purpose of presenting statistical data relating to stream flow and kindred subjects for the Colorado River from Imperial Dam to the Gulf of California, the Tijuana River and its important tributaries in the United States and Mexico, and other streams, including the Alamo and New Rivers which cross the California-Baja California boundary, and the Santa Cruz River and Whitewater Draw which cross the Arizona-Sonora boundary. This Bulletin contains information for the year 2004. Stream gaging on the Colorado River below Imperial Dam began in 1902 when the station at Yuma, Arizona was established. Stage records were obtained at this station from January 1878 until December 1973, when it was discontinued. Continuous stream gaging on the Tijuana River and its important tributaries in the United States and in Mexico began in 1936. Each government operates the gaging stations located within its own country. COLORADO RIVER BELOW IMPERIAL DAM Below Imperial Dam, the Colorado River flows southward 16 kilometers to the mouth of the Gila River, thence westward 18 kilometers to Pilot Knob Mountain, and south 1.6 kilometers to the point where the northerly international land boundary, between California and Baja California, intersects the river. From this point the river continues to flow southward and forms the boundary between the United States and Mexico for a distance of about 35 kilometers to the point where the southerly international land boundary between Arizona and Sonora intersects the river. From this point the river continues to flow southward about 145 kilometers to discharge into the Gulf of California. The ordinary flows of Colorado River below Imperial Dam are largely controlled by releases at Hoover Dam, completed in 1935. The releases are further regulated at Davis Dam, completed in 1950, and by Parker and Imperial Dams, completed in 1938. Small amounts of runoff may occasionally be contributed to the flow in the lower river from the usually dry arroyos draining the 28,200 square kilometers along the river from Hoover Dam to the mouth of the Gila River. In addition, flows ranging from usually minor amounts to infrequent torrential floods may enter the lower Colorado River from the Bill Williams River, draining about 1,857 square kilometers below Alamo Dam and Lake, completed in 1963; and from the Gila River, draining about 18,900 square kilometers below Painted Rock Dam and Reservoir, completed in January 1960. At Imperial Dam, diversions are made to Gila Gravity Main Canal and All-American Canal for irrigation projects in Arizona, including the Yuma Valley, Gila and Wellton-Mohawk projects; and in California, including the Imperial Valley, Coachella Valley and Reservation Division of Yuma Project. Also, under the provisions of the 1944 Water Treaty, there may be diverted to the All-American Canal at Imperial Dam for delivery to Mexico in the Alamo Canal, or substitute canal, at the northerly boundary, a portion of Mexico's scheduled deliveries of waters of the Colorado River, which in 2004 amounted to 1,850,234 thousand cubic meters, in accordance with Article 10 of the 1944 Water Treaty. No diversions were made to a substitute canal in 2004. Below Laguna Dam, measured and unmeasured flows are returned to the river principally as waste and drain- age water from the irrigation projects in the United States. Waste and drainage waters from irrigation projects in the United States also cross the boundary into Mexico near San Luis, Arizona without returning to the river in the United States. In the limitrophe section of the river, 1.8 kilometers
Recommended publications
  • Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report

    Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report

    Climate Understanding & Resilience in the River Valley Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report Prepared by the Tijuana River National Estuarine Research Reserve for the CURRV project’s Stakeholder Working Group Updated April 14, 2014 This project is funded by a grant from the Coastal and Ocean Climate Applications Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office. Also, supported in part by a grant from the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science Collaborative. 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Resources and Geography ........................................................................................................................... 6 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Topography & Floodplain ....................................................................................................................... 6 Hydrology ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Campo Wind Cultural Report

    Campo Wind Cultural Report

    APPENDIX I Cultural Resources Report CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT IN SUPPORT OF SECTION 106 OF THE NHPA for the CAMPO WIND PROJECT WITH BOULDER BRUSH FACILITIES Reviewing Agency: Bureau of Indian Affairs Pacific Region 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California 95825 Contact: Dan Hall Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Brad Comeau, MSc, RPA, Angela Pham, MA, RPA, Micah Hale, PhD, RPA and Rachel Hoerman, PhD, MAY 2019 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report for the Campo Wind Project with Boulder Brush Facilities NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE (NADB) INFORMATION Authors: Brad Comeau, MSc, RPA; Angela Pham, MA, RPA; Micah J. Hale, PhD, RPA and Rachel Hoerman, PhD Firm: Dudek Project Proponent: Terra-Gen Development Company LLC 11512 El Camino Real, Suite 100 San Diego, California 92130 Report Date: April 2019 Report Title: Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report for the Campo Wind Project with Boulder Brush Facilities, San Diego County, California Type of Study: Phase I Archaeological Survey; Phase II Archaeological Evaluation New Sites: CWA-S-001, CWA-S-004, CWA-S-005, CWS-S-006, CWS-S-007, CWS-S- 008, CWS-S-009, CWS-S-010, CWS-S-011, CWS-S-012; ECWEP-I-015, ECWEP-SW-001, ECWEP-SW-003, ECWEP-SW-005, ECWEP-SW-006, ECWEP-SW-007, ECWEP-SW-009, ECWEP-SW-011, ECWEP-SW-017, TW-S-001, TW-S-002, TW-S-003, TW-S-007,TW-S-008, TW-S-009, TW-S- 010, TW-S-011, TW-S-012, TW-S-013, TW-S-014, TW-S-015, TW-S-016, TW-S-017, TW-S-030, TW-S-031,
  • Description of Source Water System

    Description of Source Water System

    CHAPTER 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SOURCE WATER SYSTEM 2.0 Description of the Source Water System During the last 100 years, the CSD’s water system has evolved into a very complex system. It is now estimated to serve a population of 1.4 million people spread out over 370 square miles (Table 2.1). The CSD treats imported raw water and local runoff water at three City WTPs which have a combined capacity of 378 MGD. The CSD treats water by conventional technologies using coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection. Recently, all CSD water treatment plants have been modified to provide for the addition of fluoride to the potable water supply. To ensure safe and palatable water quality, the CSD collects water samples at its reservoirs, WTPs, and throughout the treated water storage and distribution system. The CSD’s use of local and imported water to meet water demand is affected by availability, cost, and water resource management policies. Imported water availability decreases the need to carry over local water for dry years in City reservoirs. CSD policy is to use local water first to reduce imported water purchases; this policy runs the risk of increased dependence on imported water during local droughts. Table 2.1 - City of San Diego General Statistics Population (2010) 1,301,621 Population (Estimated 2014) 1,381,069 Population percent change 6.1 Land Area Square Miles 370 Population Density per Square Mile 3733 Water Distribution Area Square Miles 403 Number of Service Connections (2015) 279,102 2.1 Water Sources (Figure 2.1) Most of California's water development has been dictated by the multi-year wet/dry weather cycles.
  • Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.1

    Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.1

    CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing site characteristics and resources that may be affected by the Otay River Estuary Restoration Project (ORERP or proposed action). The approximately 165.3-acre project site is located within the South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge (NWR). The project site encompasses two separate, non-contiguous areas: the Otay River Floodplain Site and the Pond 15 Site. The 33.51-acre Otay River Floodplain Site consists of undeveloped land held in trust for the people of California by the State Lands Commission and leased to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for management as a National Wildlife Refuge. The 90.90-acre Pond 15 Site is also leased to the Service from the State Lands Commission and is currently part of a component of the South Bay Salt Works, which operates on the San Diego Bay NWR under a Special Use Permit from the Service. This chapter analyzes project-specific environmental effects, and is intended to tier from the programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision for the San Diego Bay NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan. The Environmental Impact Statement for the San Diego Bay NWR is incorporated by reference (USFWS 2006). 3.1.1 Regional and Historical Setting San Diego Bay and the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge San Diego Bay is a natural embayment located entirely in San Diego County, California, that originated from the alluvial plains of the Otay, Sweetwater, and San Diego Rivers. The entrance to the nearly enclosed water body is located approximately 9 miles northwest of the project site.
  • Water, Capitalism, and Urbanization in the Californias, 1848-1982

    Water, Capitalism, and Urbanization in the Californias, 1848-1982

    TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 14, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Hillar Yllo Schwertner All Rights Reserved ii TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: John Tutino, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This is a history of Tijuandiego—the transnational metropolis set at the intersection of the United States, Mexico, and the Pacific World. Separately, Tijuana and San Diego constitute distinct but important urban centers in their respective nation-states. Taken as a whole, Tijuandiego represents the southwestern hinge of North America. It is the continental crossroads of cultures, economies, and environments—all in a single, physical location. In other words, Tijuandiego represents a new urban frontier; a space where the abstractions of the nation-state are manifested—and tested—on the ground. In this dissertation, I adopt a transnational approach to Tijuandiego’s water history, not simply to tell “both sides” of the story, but to demonstrate that neither side can be understood in the absence of the other. I argue that the drawing of the international boundary in 1848 established an imbalanced political ecology that favored San Diego and the United States over Tijuana and Mexico. The land and water resources wrested by the United States gave it tremendous geographical and ecological advantages over its reeling southern neighbor, advantages which would be used to strengthen U.S.
  • Draft Resource Management Plan for Potrero/Mason Property San Diego County

    Draft Resource Management Plan for Potrero/Mason Property San Diego County

    Draft Resource Management Plan for Potrero/Mason Property San Diego County April 2018 The County of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation is pleased to announce the availability of the Draft Potrero/Mason Property (Property) Resource Management Plan (RMP) for public review and comment. This RMP has been prepared as a guidance document to manage and preserve the biological and cultural resources within the Property. As part of the RMP effort, biological and cultural surveys were conducted in 2012 to characterize the baseline conditions of the Property needed to develop future management and monitoring efforts. The vegetation communities within the Property include coast live oak woodland, eucalyptus woodland, chamise chaparral, coastal sage-chaparral transition, northern mixed chaparral, southern mixed chaparral, scrub oak chaparral, Diegan coastal sage scrub, coastal scrub/chaparral, non-native grassland, and foothill/mountain perennial grassland. These vegetation communities support multiple sensitive species including: coast horned lizard, loggerhead shrike, white-tailed kite, and Dulzura pocket mouse. If you have any questions, please contact Jennifer Price at (858) 966-1375. Please send your comments to the attention of Jennifer Price, via mail at 5500 Overland Avenue, Suite 410, San Diego, CA 92123; via fax to (858) 495-5841; or via email to [email protected] by May 17, 2018. Potrero/Mason Property April 2018 Draft Resource Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................
  • Flow of the Colorado River and Other Western Boundary Streams and Related Data

    Flow of the Colorado River and Other Western Boundary Streams and Related Data

    WESTERN WATER BULLETIN 1994 RECENL.iJ Flow of SEpgg 2m® The Colorado RiveyBwc .and other Western Boundary Streams and INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION UNITED STATES AND MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF STATE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1994 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION UNITED STATES AND MEXICO UNITED STATES SECTION MEXICAN SECTION JOHN M . BERNAL J. ARTURO HERRERA SOLIS .Commissioner Commissioner El Paso, Texas Cd. Juarez, Chihuahua ALTON L . GOFF CECILIO LOMELI LOPEZ Chief Area Subdirector Yuma, Arizona Hydro Office Mexicali, Baja California WESTERN WATER BULLETIN 1994 Flow of The Colorado River and other Western Boundary Streams and Related Data COLORADO RIVER TIJUANA RIVER SANTA CRUZ RIVER SAN PEDRO RIVER WHITE WATER DRAW 1994 2 WESTERN BOUNDARY WATER BULLETIN - 1994 - INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION CONTENTS Foreword and Acknowledgments 4 General Hydrologic Conditions for 1994 6 Map of Western Boundary - Douglas, Arizona to Pacific Ocean 44 I - COLORADO RIVER - IMPERIAL DAM TO GULF OF CALIFORNIA Map of Lower Colorado River, United States and Mexico . Following Page 84 QUANTITY OF WATER Stream-Flow and Stage Records Tributary - Reservation Main Drain No . 4 (California Drain) 8 Yuma Main Canal Wasteway to Colorado River at Yuma, Arizona 9 Colorado River below Yuna Main Canal Wasteway at Yuma, Arizona - Discharges 10 below Yuma Main Canal Wasteway at Yuma, Arizona - Stages 11 Tributary - Yuma Mesa Outlet Drain to Colorado River near Yuma, Arizona 12 Drain No . 8-8 (Araz Drain) 13 Pilot Knob Power Plant and Wasteway
  • South Bay Historical Society Bulletin October 2019 Issue No

    South Bay Historical Society Bulletin October 2019 Issue No

    South Bay Historical Society Bulletin October 2019 Issue No. 24 Don Sheckler painted this image of the store that area, and continues the map drawn in the previous was the center of Dulzura at the turn of the century. issue of the Bulletin showing landmarks in Jamul. It was finally possible for automobiles to travel Today Dulzura and Jamul remain unincorporated through the mountain grades on either side of the regions of San Diego County. They are mountain Dulzura Valley. Farms and ranches that were communities that still represent the rural life over previously isolated were now connected to the one hundred years ago. Yet the passing of older outside world by the dirt road that later would generations and the influx of new population, with become Highway 94. The map in this issue of the the destructive effects of wildfires, it is imperative Bulletin shows historical landmarks in the Dulzura that historical landmarks be remembered. 1 2 Dulzura’s Historic Landmrks Surveyors Hill, and it was this name that appeared on maps before the name Dulzura by Steve Schoenherr was used.1 54 - Old Stagecoach Road follows part of the 53 - “Surveyor's Hill” just north of the Dulzura route of the early stage coaches starting with Winery was a landmark on the route through the John Capron's Star Route Stage Company of mountains between the Jamul and Dulzura 1868-1876. The old road ran south from the valleys. The San Diego and Gila Railroad Campo Road to Bee Canyon, and then turned plotted this route in 1855 to link San Diego with north to join Campo Road at Engineer Springs.2 Yuma.
  • County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining

    County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining

    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works July 30, 2007 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Emergency Response Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group’s Guidelines for Determining Significance and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on the 30th day of July, 2007. I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Emergency Response Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group’s Guidelines for Determining Significance and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the 30th day of July, 2007. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Emergency Response Plans, except any revisions to Chapter 4.0 must be approved by the DCAO. Approved, July 30, 2007 EXPLANATION These Guidelines for Determining Significance for Emergency Response Plans and information presented herein shall be used by County staff for the review of discretionary projects and environmental documents pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These Guidelines present a range of quantitative, qualitative, and performance levels for particular environmental effects. Normally
  • San Diego Union-Tribune Photograph Collection

    San Diego Union-Tribune Photograph Collection

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt6r29q3mg No online items Guide to the San Diego Union-Tribune Photograph Collection Rebecca Gerber, Therese M. James, Jessica Silver San Diego Historical Society Casa de Balboa 1649 El Prado, Balboa Park, Suite 3 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 232-6203 URL: http://www.sandiegohistory.org © 2005 San Diego Historical Society. All rights reserved. Guide to the San Diego C2 1 Union-Tribune Photograph Collection Guide to the San Diego Union-Tribune Photograph Collection Collection number: C2 San Diego Historical Society San Diego, California Processed by: Rebecca Gerber, Therese M. James, Jessica Silver Date Completed: July 2005 Encoded by: Therese M. James and Jessica Silver © 2005 San Diego Historical Society. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: San Diego Union-Tribune photograph collection Dates: 1910-1975 Bulk Dates: 1915-1957 Collection number: C2 Creator: San Diego union-tribune Collection Size: 100 linear ft.ca. 150,000 items (glass and film negatives and photographic prints): b&w and color; 5 x 7 in. or smaller. Repository: San Diego Historical Society San Diego, California 92138 Abstract: The collection chiefly consists of photographic negatives, photographs, and news clippings of San Diego news events taken by staff photographers of San Diego Union-Tribune and its predecessors, San Diego Union, San Diego Sun, San Diego Evening Tribune, and San Diego Tribune-Sun, which were daily newspapers of San Diego, California, 1910-1974. Physical location: San Diego Historical Society Research Library, Booth Historical Photograph Archives, 1649 El Prado, Casa de Balboa Building, Balboa Park, San Diego, CA 92101 Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open for research.
  • Geographic Factors That Affected the Growth of San Diego's Chinatown

    Geographic Factors That Affected the Growth of San Diego's Chinatown

    Geographic Factors that Affected the Growth of San Diego’s Chinatown Relative to Los Angeles and San Francisco By Murray Kent Lee B.A. in Geography, May 1951, The George Washington University A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of the George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 18, 2014 Thesis directed by Elizabeth Chacko Associate Professor of Geography and International Affairs Acknowledgments Dr. Elizabeth Chacko met the challenge of supervising a thesis while on sabbatical in Singapore. This was not an easy task, but she had patience and understanding under less than ideal circumstances. She has earned by my gratitude for her professional performance. My wife Gladys also deserves acknowledgement for sacrificing many activities while I spent hours glued to the computer. She did some proof reading of drafts and assisted with solving some of the computer glitches, breakdowns, and inconsistencies. Thanks to Bruce Semelsberger of the San Diego Railroad Museum for his update of the San Diego and Arizona Railway and his offer to meet in Campo to review some of their collection of photos of the “Impossible Railroad.” Of the nineteen photos and maps, the San Diego History Center, nine were from the San Diego History Center archives, although only two were specifically ordered for this document. Five photos were from the author and five maps were created. I would also like to acknowledge Dr. Robert Campbell, who was my mentor in the GWU Geography Department when I received my BA in 1951.
  • Bowman South Dam Seismic Stability Analyses

    Bowman South Dam Seismic Stability Analyses

    Nevada Irrigation District Staff Report for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, August 14, 2019 TO: Honorable Board of Directors FROM: Keane Sommers, P.E., Hydroelectric Manager Dar Chen, P.E., G.E., Senior Engineer - Dam Safety DATE: August 7, 2019 SUBJECT: Bowman South Dam Seismic Stability Analyses HYDROELECTRIC RECOMMENDATION: Award a sole source contract in the amount of $225,581.30 to Quest Structures for the Bowman South Dam Seismic Stability Analyses, and authorize the General Manager to execute the necessary documents. BACKGROUND: Bowman South Dam is a 105-foot-high and 567-foot-long concrete arch dam built in 1927 in a small canyon south of Bowman North Rockfill Dam. Both of the dams form Bowman Lake, which stores and transmits water from 6 other reservoirs on Canyon Creek and the Middle Yuba River upstream to Canyon Creek and the Bowman- Spaulding Canal downstream. According to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Division of Safety of Dams of California (DSOD), Bowman South is classified as an extremely-high-hazard dam due to the potential impacts on the downstream lives and properties in the case of its failure. It is approximately 15 miles west of the Mohawk Valley fault, which can generate up to a magnitude 7.3 earthquake. The last seismic stability analysis for the dam was performed in the mid-1990s. The study identified potential instabilities at the left abutment thrust block. Since then, the seismic criteria and the method of stability analyses have greatly evolved. Based on their dam safety inspections in 2012 and 2016, the FERC required Independent Consultants recommended that the District complete seismic stability analysis updates of the dam based on the latest seismic ground motions and methods of analysis, which include 3-D non-linear, dynamic, finite-element modeling of the dam.