EXAMINING the JEWISH ORIGINS EMPLOYED in the MATTHEAN BEATITUDES THROUGH LITERARY ANALYSIS and SPEECH ACT THEORY by TIMOTHY DALE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EXAMINING the JEWISH ORIGINS EMPLOYED in the MATTHEAN BEATITUDES THROUGH LITERARY ANALYSIS and SPEECH ACT THEORY by TIMOTHY DALE EXAMINING THE JEWISH ORIGINS EMPLOYED IN THE MATTHEAN BEATITUDES THROUGH LITERARY ANALYSIS AND SPEECH ACT THEORY by TIMOTHY DALE HOWELL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in NEW TESTAMENT BIBLICAL STUDIES at the SOUTH AFRICAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY in January 2011 SUPERVISOR: DR. DAN LIOY “The opinions expressed in this dissertation do not necessarily reflect the views of the South African Theological Seminary.” DECLARATION I hereby acknowledge that the work contained in this dissertation is my own original work and has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted to any academic institution for degree purposes. ____________________________ Timothy Dale Howell January 2011 ii Acknowledgements I could never thank all those responsible for contributing to my educational and theological pursuits. Those to which I have fond memories are Peggy Cox, Robert Dockery, Dr. Fred Afman, and Dr. Roger Martin. I want to thank the following libraries for the use of their facilities: Davidson College, the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, and Wake Forest University. To Elizabeth Pearson at Montreat College, thank you for going beyond what was expected in the acquisition of books and journal articles for my research. I give sincere gratitude and appreciation to my dissertation supervisor, Dr. Dan Lioy, for his encouragement and guidance through this process. His theological acumen combined with literary insight has been invaluable to me through the dissertation process. I must thank Timothy Wolf for his inspiration and friendship over forty years. Thank you for guiding me in my “first” outline of a biblical passage and for the suggestions in the purchasing of theological works as a young student. Our discussions over the Bible have been most fruitful and practical. You have been my “apostle Paul” through the years. My uncle, Charles L. Griffith, encouraged me as a teenager to think theologically as I approached the text. Although we consider his death untimely, the influence he had on his family and friends continues. He measured his life in terms of God’s grace and spoke his last words reaffirming that same grace. My brother Keith and his wife, Cindy, provided precious family moments in their home. Thank you for all the Christmas breakfasts and our annual “gaming” along with Jason, Joshua, and Beethoven. To my cherished love, Amber Dawn, I thank you for your patience as I labored on this venture. Thank you for listening to me talk incessantly over my research and sacrificing time we could have enjoyed together. iii Words fail me in expressing gratitude to my parents, Thurman Francis and Louise Griffith Howell. Your love, guidance, and encouragement made our family a real “Beaver Cleaver” home. Thank you for giving me a love for learning and a spiritual awakening to the Scriptures. Both of you have been demonstrations of divine blessing and gracious living. I could never dream of life without my three children: Michelle Elizabeth, Christen Noel, and Timothy Matthew Blair, along with their brother, Collin Jacob Smith. The arrival of my first granddaughter, Gracie Elizabeth Thompson, has been a joy I could have never imagined! To all my family I dedicate this work. May all of you experience the reality of blessing to which this study points. iv Summary Many models have been offered in explaining the meaning of the Beatitudes. Generally, the focus is on the eschatological, ethical, sapiential, or epitome. The model proposed in this study does not replace but rather complements the other models. The proposed model is sensitive to the Jewish metanarrative that guided the Matthean composition. The primary question of this study is how the Beatitudes demonstrate that Matthew intended to utilize Jewish concepts as a paradigmatic utterance for the Matthean community. Matthew’s paradigm was the needed transition for understanding the role of the new community post 70 AD. The Beatitudes have theological and literary significance for the Christian community. The theology of blessing dominates the pericope. Other themes, such as kingdom and righteousness, have significant roles through the blessing motif. The Gospel of Matthew was the most Jewish of the Synoptic Gospels. The importance and role of Jewish concepts can be demonstrated in the developing paradigm constructed by Matthew. Since the Beatitudes were a literary composition, this study employed both exegetical and literary analysis to the pericope. The historical and social reconstruction of the Matthean community is examined to evaluate its role in the Matthean composition. In using comparative analysis to Second Temple literature, the Matthean composition demonstrates a proclivity toward Jewish concepts. The literary analysis reveals a poetic arrangement encased in a mixed genre of apocalyptic and wisdom tradition. Furthermore, with literary analysis, the Beatitude pericope will be shown to have had a mnemonic purpose in performing the Beatitudes in both the Matthean community and future Christian communities. The literary nature of the Beatitudes demonstrates a composition that developed orally. Speech act theory is utilized in understanding the oral features of the text as well as demonstrating what Jesus did in his utterances. The significance of the Beatitudes lies in the authoritative utterances of Jesus. v By employing speech act theory on the Beatitudes, the sayings of Jesus are investigated to demonstrate the force of the utterances upon the Matthean community. It is understood that Matthew intended to compose a pericope in serving as a paradigmatic utterance to guide the Matthean community in its existence and mission in the world. In addition, the paradigm is to be adopted by all Christian communities in their mission to the world. This study found six principles guiding speech act theory on the Beatitudes. A speech act model is presented and applied to the Beatitudes pericope (Matt 5:3-16). The formula is SP+(EE)CH=ACT : analyze the Situated Performativity of a text, add it to the multiplying nature of Existential Engagement by the interpreter with the illocutionary force found through the Critical Horizon of guiding worldviews, and the result is an Acquired Communal Translation for the social body. Performative utterances provide a situation for the speaker and audience to engage in their roles of communication within the world of reality to which the language speaks. It is through the imagination and compliance of the hearer whereby the illocutionary force has successful results. Through ritual or performance, the significance of the Beatitudes occurs in the experience of utterance. The experience of the social body has a multiplying effect as it bridges the situated performative text (“ SP ”) to the present “SP+(EE) ”. The existential role advocated in this model is more pragmatic than philosophical. The strength of engagement is relative to how a social body measures or values the illocutionary force. From this model, it is concluded that Matthew intended for the Jewish concepts interwoven through the literary and theological construct of the Beatitudes, to be adopted by the new community, serving as a paradigmatic utterance for understanding its existence and purpose in representing Jesus as the presence of God in the world . vi Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background of Study 1 1.1.1 Selected Theological Approaches to Beatitudes 2 1.1.2 Speech Act Theory as an Exegetical Tool 7 1.2 Research Problem and Questions 9 1.3 Purpose, Significance, and Rationale of Study 11 1.3.1 The Oral Nature of the Beatitude Composition 12 1.3.2 The Jewish Metanarrative 13 1.3.3 The Social Context of the Matthean Community 13 1.4 Assumptions and Delimitations 14 1.4.1 Assumptions 14 1.4.2 Delimitations 16 1.5 Research Design and Methodology 17 1.5.1 Exegetical Analysis 17 1.5.2 Literary and Poetical Analysis 19 1.5.3 Speech Act Theory 21 1.6 Definitions of Key Words 23 1.7 Hypothesis 24 1.8 Chapter Overview 24 2. Various Views of Jewish-Christian Identification and Its Implications for the Matthean Community 26 2.1 Rival Movement Within Judaism 27 2.1.1 Overman and “Matthean Jesus is Best Option” 27 2.1.2 Segal and “Matthew’s Jewish Voice” 28 2.1.3 Saldarini and “Perfected Judaism” 29 2.1.4 Sim and “Christian Judaism” 30 2.2 Rebellious Movement Away From Judaism 31 2.2.1 Stendahl and “Matthew’s Handbook” 31 2.2.2 Dunn and “The Parting of the Ways” 32 2.2.3 Wright and “Exile and Renewal” 33 2.2.4 Stanton and a “New People” 34 2.3 Remnant Movement Beside Judaism 36 2.3.1 Bauckham and “Christianity the New Temple” 36 2.3.2 Ascough and “Community Formation” 37 2.3.3 Skarsaune and “Jewish Influences” 38 2.4 Evaluation of Models and Implications for the Matthean Community 39 2.4.1 Rival Movement: An Ethnic Model 40 2.4.2 Rebellious Movement: A Sociological Model 41 2.4.3 Remnant Movement Model: A Theological Model 42 vii 2.4.4 Implications for the Matthean Community 43 2.5 Conclusions of Jewish-Christian Matthean Community 47 3. Major Issues Bearing Upon a Contextual Analysis of the Beatitudes 50 3.1 The Jewish Metanarrative Used by Matthew 51 3.1.1 The Covenants: Hope in the Divine Promise Seen Through Sonship 53 3.1.2 The Temple: Faith in the Divine Presence Through Emmanuel 56 3.1.3 The Torah: Continuity to the Divine Principle as Fulfillment 59 3.1.4 Gospel of the Kingdom: Acceptance of Divine Pronouncement through Hearing and Doing 65 3.2 Influences of a Religious and Socio-Historical Milieu 67 3.2.1 Religious Milieu: Examples from the Dead Sea Scrolls 68 3.2.2 Hellenistic Milieu: Rhetoric and Orality Situated in the Text 74 3.2.3 Social Milieu: Mediterranean Values of Honor, Family and Patronage 87 3.2.4 Political Milieu: The Roman Empire and the Ekklesia 92 3.3 A Summary of the Contextual Analysis of the Beatitudes 94 4.
Recommended publications
  • St Michael & All Angels
    Events for the week 20th —26th March 2016 th St Michael & All Angels Sun 20 10.30am Choir Practice Choir Vestry Wed 23rd 6.30pm Junior Choir Practice Choir Vestry Macclesfield Team Ministry 7.30pm Full Choir Practice Choir Vestry Our Purpose To journey inward and upward to God, whom we know in Jesus, To journey outward to other people and to all creation. Thurs 24th 10.00am Toddler Group St Michael’s 10.30am Holy Communion St Michael’s Welcome 1.00pm Toddler Group St Michael’s If you are visiting, we hope you feel at home. A welcome card is available 7.30pm Bell ringing Bell Tower near the entrance or from a sides-person. If you are new, please complete Sat 26th 10.00am Saturday Prayer Meeting Savage Chapel, St Michael’s one and hand it to a sides-person, so that we can keep in touch. Next week’s services Sunday 20th March 2016 Palm Sunday Maundy Thursday 23rd March 7.30pm Tenebrae Service: United Reformed Church th 9.30 Storytelling Service 11.00 Holy Communion Good Friday 24 March 10.30am Good Friday Service Leader Mike Strutt Good Friday 24th March 2.00-4.00pm Contemplating the Cross: Savage Chapel th Leader Jenny Speaker Rev’d Barry Langman Easter Sunday 27 March: 10.30am Joint Service of Holy Communion Storyteller Gemma Story The Last Passover Bible Passages Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29 Adult Leader Sue Luke 19:28-40 Electronic version of church notice sheet Roots Leader Jenny If you wish to be included in the list of those who receive the church notice sheet electronically each week, please email Lynne Spedding at [email protected] Roots Passage Luke 19:28-40 Roots Leaders George & Ruth Songs Make way Roots Passage Luke 19:28-40 Scout and Guide Groups We are on the Lord’s road Macclesfield Parish Church Scout and Guide Group provides youth Hymns activities throughout the week for young people aged from 5 - 26 as well MP 7 All creatures of our God and king as flexible volunteering opportunities for adults.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Gospel of John
    1 Gospel of John - 2 1:19-51 Introduction - Abrupt shift from the theology of 1:1-18 into an action sequence. - 1:19-12:50 is Book of Signs o Ends with Jewish nation rejection of Jesus – 12:36b-37 - Two primary sections o Initiation into beginning of Jesus’ ministry (witness of John Baptist) Declarations of his identity • Forerunner v. 23 • Lamb of God v. 29 • Son of God v. 34,49 • Rabbi v. 38,49 • Messiah/Christ v. 41 • King of Israel v. 49 • Son of Man v. 51 o Calling of the first disciples - Trial Motif o World is put on trial…to prove Jesus’ innocence and world’s guilt Parade of witnesses before the readers John the Baptist and first disciples Along with multiple OT reference to prove he is the Christ 1. THE WITNESS OF JOHN THE BAPTIST 1:19-28 v. 19 – Jews sent priests/Levites – “Jews” used 68x in John…66 are negative in reference to Jewish leaders. John’s shorthand for ‘rejection of Jesus by Jewish leaders.’ v. 20 – not the Christ – Messiah (Hebrew)/Christ (Greek) means ‘anointed.’ - OT expectations – lead/teach/save Israel o Davidic King/Savior – 2 Samuel 7:5-16; Psalm 110:1-4; Isaiah 9:6-7 - Elijah – never died (2 Kings 2:11) – expected to return in end times o Malachi 4:5 to ‘restore all things’ Matthew 11:12-15 (Jesus clarifies what he knows, but John does not) Matthew 17:9-13 Luke 1:17 o John the Baptist even resembled description of Elijah in rough lifestyle Matthew 3:4 // 2 Kings 1:8 2 - The Prophet – reference to Moses in Deuteronomy 18:15-18 o Referenced in Acts 3:22; 7:37 o Highly expected in Jesus’ day / assumed another forerunner to Messiah John 6:14; 7:40-44 o Though John was a prophet, he was not THE prophet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Identity of Jesus of Nazareth*
    Criswell Theological Review 6.1 (1992) 91-130. Copyright © 1992 by The Criswell College. Cited with permission. THE IDENTITY OF JESUS OF NAZARETH* CARL F. H. HENRY Lecturer at Large Prison Fellowship Ministries Nowhere is the tension between historically repeatable acts and a once-for-all event focused more dramatically than in the conflict over the identity of Jesus of Nazareth. Shall we explain him as the ideal model of mankind and expound divine incarnation by philosophical analysis of what is humanly possible, or shall we depict him rather in terms of the christologically unparalleled? The Gospels provide our only significant information about Jesus' life and work. Skeptical critics thrust upon these sources tests of reliabil- ity that they do not impose upon other historical writing. If universally applied, those same criteria would in principle invalidate ancient Greek and Roman accounts that secular historians routinely accept as factual.1 Efforts to destroy the credibility of gospels often betray a bias against the supernatural. Gerald G. O'Collins recalls "the official Soviet thesis (which appears recently to have been abandoned) that Jesus never existed and was a purely mythological figure.”2 Consistent Marx- ists would need to reject the theology-of-revolution view that the his- torical figure of Jesus nurtures its liberationist challenge to an alienated world. The assumptions of evolutionary naturalism likewise lead to a rejection of Jesus as in any way normative and decisive for human destiny. * This essay represents the two lectures read at the Criswell Lecture Series, Criswell College, January 1991. 1 Cf. A N. Sherwin-White, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testa- ment, (London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus Is Crucified
    Unit 26, Session 5 Unit 26, Session 5 Jesus Is Crucified SESSION IN A SENTENCE: Jesus was rejected, mocked, and forsaken as He was unjustly condemned to die, but He gave up His life willingly on the cross to glorify the Father and bring us to Him. BACKGROUND PASSAGE: Mark 15:6-47 The early Christians could have chosen plenty of symbols to represent Jesus and the gospel: the dove as a symbol of the Holy Spirit descending on Jesus at His baptism; hands as a symbol of Jesus’ healing touch; the boat from which He calmed a storm; a royal scepter as a symbol of the kingdom He came to proclaim; the mountain on which He was transfigured in glory; palm branches as a symbol of His triumphal entry into Jerusalem. Any of these could have been worthy symbols of Jesus’ life and ministry, but instead, the early Christians chose a cross as their most important symbol, representing Jesus’ sacrificial death, a centerpiece of the gospel. What are some ways you have seen the cross used to represent the Christian faith? 84 Date of My Bible Study: ______________________________ © 2020 LifeWay Christian Resources Group Time Point 1: Jesus is the rejected Savior of the world (Mark 15:6,11-15). 6 At the festival Pilate used to release for the people a prisoner whom they requested … 11 But the chief priests stirred up the crowd so that he would release Barabbas to them instead. 12 Pilate asked them again, “Then what do you want me to do with the one you call the king of the Jews?” 13 Again they shouted, “Crucify him!” 14 Pilate said to them, “Why? What has he done wrong?” But they shouted all the more, “Crucify him!” 15 Wanting to satisfy the crowd, Pilate released Barabbas to them; and after having Jesus flogged, he handed him over to be crucified.
    [Show full text]
  • A Divine Round Trip: the Literary and Christological Function of the Descent/Ascent Leitmotif in the Gospel of John
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2014 A Divine Round Trip: The Literary and Christological Function of the Descent/Ascent Leitmotif in the Gospel of John Susan Elizabeth Humble University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Humble, Susan Elizabeth, "A Divine Round Trip: The Literary and Christological Function of the Descent/ Ascent Leitmotif in the Gospel of John" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 978. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/978 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. A Divine Round Trip: The Literary and Christological Function of the Descent/Ascent Leitmotif in the Gospel of John _________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the University of Denver and the Iliff School of Theology Joint PhD Program University of Denver ________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _________ by Susan Elizabeth Humble November 2014 Advisor: Gregory Robbins ©Copyright by Susan Elizabeth Humble 2014 All Rights Reserved Author: Susan Elizabeth Humble Title: A Divine Round Trip: The Literary and Christological Function of the Descent/Ascent Leitmotif in the Gospel of John Advisor: Gregory Robbins Degree Date: November 2014 ABSTRACT The thesis of this dissertation is that the Descent/Ascent Leitmotif, which includes the language of not only descending and ascending, but also going, coming, and being sent, performs a significant literary and christological function in the Gospel of John.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic FM Temp
    The Resurrection of the Messiah A Narrative Commentary on the Resurrection Accounts in the Four Gospels Francis J. Moloney, SDB PAULIST PRESS New York / Mahwah, NJ The Scripture quotations contained herein are from the author’s own translation and the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright 1952 [2nd edition, 1971] by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Cover image by fotogiunta/Shutterstock.com Cover and book design by Sharyn Banks Copyright © 2013 by Francis J. Moloney All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Moloney, Francis J. The resurrection of the Messiah : a narrative commentary on the Resurrection accounts in the four gospels / Francis J. Moloney, SDB. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8091-4847-9 (alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58768-296-4 1. Jesus Christ—Resurrection. 2. Passion narratives (Gospels) 3. Bible. Gospels— Commentaries. 4. Bible. Gospels—Criticism, Narrative. I. Title. BT482.M65 2013 226`.06—dc23 2013024105 ISBN: 978-0-8091-4847-9 (paperback) ISBN: 978-1-58768-296-4 (e-book) Published by Paulist Press 997 Macarthur Boulevard Mahwah, New Jersey 07430 www.paulistpress.com Printed and bound
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Repentance and the Kingdom of God * * *
    MSJ 27/1 (Spring 2016) 161–86 ISRAEL’S REPENTANCE AND THE KINGDOM OF GOD Michael J. Vlach Professor of Theology The Master’s Seminary The exact timing of Jesus’ return and the kingdom of God is known only to God. Yet in His sovereignty God has determined that the return of Jesus the Mes- siah is closely linked with the repentance of national Israel. This article examines both Old and New Testament texts that reveal a close connection between Israel’s repentance and the coming kingdom of God. * * * * * Introduction This article examines the connection between national Israel’s repentance and the kingdom of God. The argument promoted here is that the kingdom’s coming to earth is connected with and contingent upon Israel’s repentance.1 God is sovereign over all matters, and His universal kingdom extends over all, yet He has determined that the arrival of the mediatorial kingdom2 on earth is connected with Israel’s turning from sin and unbelief. This position, that the kingdom’s timing is related to national Israel’s repentance, is not popular and is often rejected. For example, the amillennial theologian, Kim Riddlebarger states, “But the New Testament knows nothing of a kingdom offered and kingdom withdrawn according to the whims of unbelieving Is- rael.”3 Yet the biblical evidence for the kingdom’s arrival being related to Israel’s repentance is strong, with multiple passages in both testaments supporting it. This is an oft-neglected truth, even among those who affirm a future for national Israel. Yet it is an important part of the Bible’s storyline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christology of Mark
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 1972 The Christology of Mark Gregory L. Jackson Wilfrid Laurier University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Jackson, Gregory L., "The Christology of Mark" (1972). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1511. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1511 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHRISTOLOGY OF MARK by Gregory L. Jackson A Thesis submitted to the Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree MASTER OF DIVINITY from Waterloo Lutheran Seminary Waterloo, Ontario May 30, 1972 n^^ty of *he Library "-'uo University College UMI Number: EC56448 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI EC56448 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml
    [Show full text]
  • Greg Goswell, “Early Readers of the Gospels: the KEPHALAIA and TITLOI of Codex Alexandrinus”
    [JGRChJ 6 (2009) 134-74] EARLY READERS OF THE GOSPELS: THE KEPHALAIA AND TITLOI OF CODEX ALEXANDRINUS Greg Goswell Presbyterian Theological College, Melbourne, Australia For the New Testament, the oldest system of capitulation (division into chapters) known to us is that preserved in Codex Vaticanus (B 03) of the fourth century.1 I will use the notation V1, V2 etc. to refer to chapters of Vaticanus. Even a cursory examination of Vaticanus is enough to reveal that the divisions represent an evaluation of what are the sense units of the biblical passages. Each successive chapter in the Gospels is numbered using Greek letters written in red ink to the left of the columns. Capitulation is further indicated by a space of (usually) two letters at the close of the preceding chapter, a short horizontal line (paragraphos) above the first letter of the first whole line of the new chapter marking the close of the preceding paragraph, and sometimes by a letter protruding into the left margin (ekthesis).2 The system of 1. H.K. McArthur, ‘The Earliest Divisions of the Gospels’, in Studia Evangelica, III. 2 (ed. F.L. Cross; Texte und Untersuchungen, 88; Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1964), pp. 266-72. After rejecting three other possible explanations, McAr- thur suggests that the divisions were used for citation purposes, especially in aca- demic circles. For alternate systems of chapter division in Greek versions of the Old Testament, see Robert Devreesse, Introduction à l’étude des manuscrits grecs (Paris: Klincksieck, 1954), pp. 139-41. The major divisions in Vaticanus are called chapters, while those in Alexandrinus, which are the basis of the standard divisions used in Nestle-Aland (Novum Testamentum Graece [27th Edition] = NTG27) are called kephalaia.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL SESSION the Resurrection Is Central to the Faith
    SPECIAL SESSION The Resurrection is Central to the Faith SESSION SUMMARY Jesus’ resurrection points both backward and forward His followers. It points back to what Jesus has done in history through His life, death, and resurrection and God saving us and raising us spiritually. At the same time, Jesus’ resurrection points forward to the day when Christ will return and we will experience ultimate victory over sin and the final completion of our faith in Him. SCRIPTURE 1 Corinthians 15:1-28 46 Leader Guide / Special Session THE POINT Christianity stands or falls with the resurrection of Jesus. INTRO/STARTER 5-10 MINUTES Option 1 Over time, it has become popular in our culture to question even the possibility of miracles; however, of all the miracles that cause problems for those who reject the idea of them, Jesus’ resurrection is the most controversial, debated, and denied. Maybe some people find it easier to believe the parting of the Red Sea, manna appearing from heaven, or an endless supply of flour and oil than to believe in Jesus’ resurrection. Why is this one miracle so much more divisive than all the rest? Maybe because it is the one miracle that demands a personal decision about who Jesus is. The resurrection is essential to the gospel message because it displays God’s defense of the life and work of Jesus Christ. If you believe in the resurrection, then you are forced to believe Jesus is the Son of God. If you deny the resurrection, you continue in your rejection of Jesus. For this reason, the resurrection is one of the most important events in human history.
    [Show full text]
  • PALM SUNDAY of the PASSION of the LORD (5 April 2020) Judas to Betray Jesus
    PALM SUNDAY OF THE PASSION OF THE LORD (5 April 2020) Judas to Betray Jesus Then one of the twelve, whose name was Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests and said, “What will you give me if I deliver him over to you?” And they paid him thirty pieces of silver. And from that moment he sought an opportunity to betray him. The Passover with the Disciples Now on the first day of Unleavened Bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Where will you have us prepare for you to eat the Passover?” He said, “Go into the city to a certain man and say to him, ‘The Teacher says, My time is at hand. I will keep the Passover at your house with my disciples.’” And the disciples did as Jesus had directed them, and they prepared the Passover. When it was evening, he reclined at table with the twelve. And as they were eating, he said, “Truly, I say to you, one of you will betray me.” And they were very sorrowful and began to say to him one after another, “Is it I, Lord?” He answered, “He who has dipped his hand in the dish with me will betray me. The Son of Man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man if he had not been born.” Judas, who would betray him, answered, “Is it I, Rabbi?” He said to him, “You have said so.” Institution of the Lord’s Supper Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark 15:21-32 — the Crucifixion
    Mark 15:21-32 — The Crucifixion November 1, 2020 Turn to Mark 15:21. While you are turning, you need to know that today, and the next three weeks, are special at CrossWinds. We are studying the most important events in the history of the world. Today, we are studying the crucifixion of Jesus. Next week is the death of Jesus. The following week is the burial of Jesus. Finally, we will look at the resurrection of Jesus. Nothing is more important than Jesus’ death and resurrection. Everything in the Gospel of Mark leads up to these events. That is what makes today, and the next few weeks, so special. Let’s read our passage before we study it. And they compelled a passerby, Simon of Cyrene, who was coming in from the country, the father of Alexander and Rufus, to carry his cross. And they brought him to the place called Golgotha (which means Place of a Skull). And they offered him wine mixed with myrrh, but he did not take it. And they crucified him and divided his garments among them, casting lots for them, to decide what each should take. And it was the third hour when they crucified him. And the inscription of the charge against him read, “The King of the Jews.” And with him they crucified two robbers, one on his right and one on his left. And those who passed by derided him, wagging their heads and saying, “Aha! You who would destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days, save yourself, and come down from the cross!” So also the chief priests with the scribes mocked him to one another, saying, “He saved others; he cannot save himself.
    [Show full text]