DOCSLIB.ORG

Israel's Repentance and the Kingdom of God * * *

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Israel's Repentance and the Kingdom of God * * * MSJ 27/1 (Spring 2016) 161–86 ISRAEL’S REPENTANCE AND THE KINGDOM OF GOD Michael J. Vlach Professor of Theology The Master’s Seminary The exact timing of Jesus’ return and the kingdom of God is known only to God. Yet in His sovereignty God has determined that the return of Jesus the Mes- siah is closely linked with the repentance of national Israel. This article examines both Old and New Testament texts that reveal a close connection between Israel’s repentance and the coming kingdom of God. * * * * * Introduction This article examines the connection between national Israel’s repentance and the kingdom of God. The argument promoted here is that the kingdom’s coming to earth is connected with and contingent upon Israel’s repentance.1 God is sovereign over all matters, and His universal kingdom extends over all, yet He has determined that the arrival of the mediatorial kingdom2 on earth is connected with Israel’s turning from sin and unbelief. This position, that the kingdom’s timing is related to national Israel’s repentance, is not popular and is often rejected. For example, the amillennial theologian, Kim Riddlebarger states, “But the New Testament knows nothing of a kingdom offered and kingdom withdrawn according to the whims of unbelieving Is- rael.”3 Yet the biblical evidence for the kingdom’s arrival being related to Israel’s repentance is strong, with multiple passages in both testaments supporting it. This is an oft-neglected truth, even among those who affirm a future for national Israel. Yet it is an important part of the Bible’s storyline. 1 By contingency we mean that certain conditions must occur before an event can happen. 2 By mediatorial we mean the God-intended reign of man on earth for God’s glory fulfilling the rule and subdue mandate of Genesis 1:26–28. 3 Kim Riddlebarger, A Case for Amillennialism: Understanding the End Times (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003), 103. 161 162 | Israel’s Repentance and the Kingdom of God Contingency and Nations (Jeremiah 18:1–11) Jeremiah 18 addresses the concept of contingency concerning God’s dealing with nations. This chapter reveals and emphasizes both God’s sovereignty and His varied responses to nations based on their actions toward Him: The word which came to Jeremiah from the LORD saying, “Arise and go down to the potter’s house, and there I will announce My words to you.” Then I went down to the potter’s house, and there he was, making something on the wheel. But the vessel that he was making of clay was spoiled in the hand of the potter; so he remade it into another vessel, as it pleased the potter to make (Jer 18:1– 4). The potter and clay analogy emphasizes God’s sovereignty and the Creator’s superi- ority and control over His creatures. This analogy is an important part of Paul’s ar- gument in Romans 9 where Paul explains God’s sovereignty with His saving pur- poses (Rom 9:20–23). Then the potter and clay analogy is related to Israel: Then the word of the LORD came to me saying, “Can I not, O house of Israel, deal with you as this potter does?” declares the LORD. “Behold, like the clay in the potter’s hand, so are you in My hand, O house of Israel. At one moment I might speak concerning a nation or concerning a kingdom to uproot, to pull down, or to destroy it; if that nation against which I have spoken turns from its evil, I will relent concerning the calamity I planned to bring on it. Or at another moment I might speak concerning a nation or concerning a kingdom to build up or to plant it; if it does evil in My sight by not obeying My voice, then I will think better of the good with which I had promised to bless it. So now then, speak to the men of Judah and against the inhabitants of Jerusalem saying, ‘Thus says the LORD, “Behold, I am fashioning calamity against you and devising a plan against you. Oh turn back, each of you from his evil way, and reform your ways and your deeds”’ (Jer 18:5–11). Particularly important is the statement that God might declare calamity upon a nation, yet if that nation repents of its evil then God will “relent concerning the calamity” He predicted for that nation (vv. 7–8). In other words, if a nation repents, God will not bring the predicted judgment upon that nation at that time. Likewise, God might speak of blessing for a nation, yet if that nation does evil in God’s sight, then God will not bring blessing. So then, by God’s sovereign design the response of a nation can influence God’s dealings with that nation. As Toussaint observes in regard to Jeremiah 18, “Here the response of a nation to God’s prophecy may affect its future.”4 One clear example of this principle is found in Jonah. The prophet Jonah proph- esied that Nineveh would be destroyed in forty days—“Yet forty days and Nineveh will be overthrown” (Jon 3:4). But the people of Nineveh and their king “believed in 4 Stanley Toussaint, “The Contingency of the Coming of the Kingdom,” in Integrity of Heart, Skill- fulness of Hands: Biblical and Leadership Studies in Honor of Donald K. Campbell, eds. Charles H. Dyer and Roy B. Zuck (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1994), 225. The Master’s Seminary Journal | 163 God” and repented (Jon 3:5–9). As a result, God relented concerning his judgment upon them: “When God saw their deeds, that they turned from their wicked way, then God relented concerning the calamity which He had declared He would bring upon them. And He did not do it” (Jon 3:10). Judgment was predicted for Nineveh in forty days, yet Nineveh repented and justice was delayed. Compare the principle in Jeremiah 18 with what occurs in Jonah 3: Jeremiah 18:8: “if that nation against which I have spoken turns from its evil, I will relent concerning the calamity I planned to bring on it.” Jonah 3:10: “When God saw their [Nineveh’s] deeds, that they turned from their wicked way, then God relented concerning the calamity which He had declared He would bring upon them. And He did not do it” (Jon 3:10). This is a case where national repentance connected with a major city (Nineveh) de- layed God’s judgment. On multiple occasions the OT prophets declared that national repentance on Israel’s part would bring kingdom blessings and reinstatement to the blessings of the Abrahamic covenant: Leviticus 26:40–45: “If they [Israel] confess their iniquity . .” “Then I will remember my covenant with Jacob . and I will remember the land.” Jeremiah 3:12–18: “‘Return, faithless Israel,’ declares the LORD . .” “Then I will give you . (shepherds to feed, prosperity in the land, God’s presence, nations coming to Jerusalem, unification of Israel)” 2 Chronicles 7:13–14: “If . My people . humble themselves and pray and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways . .” “then I will hear from heaven, will forgive their sin and will heal their land.” Note the cause and effect relationship above. If Israel repents then God blesses Israel. These passages assume Israel’s disobedience and consequences for covenant be- trayal. But hope exists. If Israel repents then kingdom blessings will arrive and a reversal of negative circumstances will occur. This includes spiritual salvation and physical prosperity, including the land. 164 | Israel’s Repentance and the Kingdom of God The concept of contingency resurfaces again in Jeremiah 4:1–2, but this time concerning what Israel’s repentance means for the nations. Israel’s repentance will lead to blessings for the nations: “If you will return, O Israel,” declares the LORD . .” “then the nations will bless themselves in Him, and in Him they will glory.” This reaffirms the truth of Genesis 12:2–3 and 22:18 that God’s plans are mediated through the nation Israel, but they also extend to Gentile nations. God’s blessing of Israel results in the blessing of the world (Isa 27:6). So Israel needs to know that their obedience or disobedience affects others as well as themselves. In this case Israel’s repentance can lead to blessings for the nations. This is something Paul explicitly states in Romans 11:12, 15 where Israel’s belief leads to greater blessings for the world: Now if their [Israel’s] transgression is riches for the world and their failure is riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their [Israel’s] fulfillment be! (Rom 11:12). For if their [Israel’s] rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their [Israel’s] acceptance be but life from the dead? (Rom 11:15). Contingency and the Kingdom (Leviticus 26) Leviticus 26 discusses the relationship between the Abrahamic and Mosaic cov- enants and predicts consequences to Israel for both obedience and disobedience. This chapter also reveals how Israel can once again experience the blessings of the Abra- hamic covenant after judgment and dispersion. Verses 1–13 promise blessings for obedience. If Israel obeys God’s command- ments the people will be blessed in every way. They will experience national pros- perity including abundant rain and harvests. The people will not fear wild animals or hostile people groups. They will also enjoy God’s special presence—“I will also walk among you and be your God, and you shall be My people” (26:12).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • God's Repentance-Enabling Forgiveness
    64 Copyright © 2001 The Center for Christian Ethics at Baylor University God’s Repentance-Enabling Forgiveness BY RALPH C. WOOD It is the Easter event—the Father’s gracious rejection of our dreadful rejection, the Son’s awful assumption of the world’s entire burden of sin, the Holy Spirit’s infusion of forgiveness into our lives—that provides our only hope for repentance. A Flannery O’Connor short story shows this extravagant claim is not mere theological word-play, but a matter of life and death. oltaire famously declared, “God forgives because it’s his business.” The great atheist could refer blithely to the God in whom he did Vnot believe because he also had contempt for the chief Christian virtue. Mercy and pity and forgiveness are not the traits of heroic peoples and cultures. The Greeks, for example, sanctioned pity only for the weak and the helpless, never for the strong and the guilty. Thus did Voltaire aim to trivialize forgiveness by turning it into something automatic, making it a matter of rote, thus denying it any real significance. Yet the old skeptic spoke more truly than he knew. In the profound original sense of the word, forgiveness is indeed God’s business: his essential occupation, his constant activity, his diligent engagement—indeed, his very nature. Thus it is meant to form our fundamental character as Christians. GOD’S FORGIVENESS PRECEDES REPENTANCE The common assumption, found even in the most standard textbooks and dictionaries of theology, is that our forgiveness remains conditional God’s Repentance-Enabling Forgiveness 65 upon our repentance: first we repent, and then God forgives.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Gospel of John
    1 Gospel of John - 2 1:19-51 Introduction - Abrupt shift from the theology of 1:1-18 into an action sequence. - 1:19-12:50 is Book of Signs o Ends with Jewish nation rejection of Jesus – 12:36b-37 - Two primary sections o Initiation into beginning of Jesus’ ministry (witness of John Baptist) Declarations of his identity • Forerunner v. 23 • Lamb of God v. 29 • Son of God v. 34,49 • Rabbi v. 38,49 • Messiah/Christ v. 41 • King of Israel v. 49 • Son of Man v. 51 o Calling of the first disciples - Trial Motif o World is put on trial…to prove Jesus’ innocence and world’s guilt Parade of witnesses before the readers John the Baptist and first disciples Along with multiple OT reference to prove he is the Christ 1. THE WITNESS OF JOHN THE BAPTIST 1:19-28 v. 19 – Jews sent priests/Levites – “Jews” used 68x in John…66 are negative in reference to Jewish leaders. John’s shorthand for ‘rejection of Jesus by Jewish leaders.’ v. 20 – not the Christ – Messiah (Hebrew)/Christ (Greek) means ‘anointed.’ - OT expectations – lead/teach/save Israel o Davidic King/Savior – 2 Samuel 7:5-16; Psalm 110:1-4; Isaiah 9:6-7 - Elijah – never died (2 Kings 2:11) – expected to return in end times o Malachi 4:5 to ‘restore all things’ Matthew 11:12-15 (Jesus clarifies what he knows, but John does not) Matthew 17:9-13 Luke 1:17 o John the Baptist even resembled description of Elijah in rough lifestyle Matthew 3:4 // 2 Kings 1:8 2 - The Prophet – reference to Moses in Deuteronomy 18:15-18 o Referenced in Acts 3:22; 7:37 o Highly expected in Jesus’ day / assumed another forerunner to Messiah John 6:14; 7:40-44 o Though John was a prophet, he was not THE prophet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Identity of Jesus of Nazareth*
    Criswell Theological Review 6.1 (1992) 91-130. Copyright © 1992 by The Criswell College. Cited with permission. THE IDENTITY OF JESUS OF NAZARETH* CARL F. H. HENRY Lecturer at Large Prison Fellowship Ministries Nowhere is the tension between historically repeatable acts and a once-for-all event focused more dramatically than in the conflict over the identity of Jesus of Nazareth. Shall we explain him as the ideal model of mankind and expound divine incarnation by philosophical analysis of what is humanly possible, or shall we depict him rather in terms of the christologically unparalleled? The Gospels provide our only significant information about Jesus' life and work. Skeptical critics thrust upon these sources tests of reliabil- ity that they do not impose upon other historical writing. If universally applied, those same criteria would in principle invalidate ancient Greek and Roman accounts that secular historians routinely accept as factual.1 Efforts to destroy the credibility of gospels often betray a bias against the supernatural. Gerald G. O'Collins recalls "the official Soviet thesis (which appears recently to have been abandoned) that Jesus never existed and was a purely mythological figure.”2 Consistent Marx- ists would need to reject the theology-of-revolution view that the his- torical figure of Jesus nurtures its liberationist challenge to an alienated world. The assumptions of evolutionary naturalism likewise lead to a rejection of Jesus as in any way normative and decisive for human destiny. * This essay represents the two lectures read at the Criswell Lecture Series, Criswell College, January 1991. 1 Cf. A N. Sherwin-White, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testa- ment, (London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • Repentance, Penance, & the Forgiveness of Sins
    REPENTANCE, PENANCE, & THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS Catholic translations of the Bible have often used the words “repentance” and “penance” interchangeably. Compare the Douay- Rheims Version with the New American Catholic Bible at Acts 2:38 and Acts 26:20 and you will see that these words (repentance & penance) are synonymous, words carrying the same meaning as the another. The Catholic Dictionary published by “Our Sunday Visitor”, a Catholic publication defines these words in the following ways: Repentance = Contrition for sins and the resulting embrace of Christ in conformity to Him. Penance or Penitence = Spiritual change that enables a sinner to turn away from sin. The virtue that enables human beings to acknowledge their sins with true contrition and a firm purpose of amendment. If there is any difference of meaning, I would suggest from pondering Greek definitions, that repentance (from the New Testament) 1 focuses on a change of heart, a change of mind and penance centers on the works of faith that this change of heart has produced. But both the change of heart and the works of faith go together; they are part of the same package. The Church has always taught that Christ’s death and resurrection brought reconciliation between God and humanity and that “the Lord entrusted the ministry of reconciliation to the Church.”1 The catechism teaches that because sin often wrongs the neighbor, while absolution forgives sin, “it does not remedy all the disorders sin has caused,”2 therefore the sinner must still recover his full spiritual health by doing works meet for repentance, that is, prove your repentance by what you do.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrew Roots Perversion of Repentance
    Hebrew Roots Heresy (Part 1) The Perversion of ‘Repentance’ By Tim Warner © www.4windsfellowships.net It is remarkable that one of the most serious errors that infected early Christianity, that was officially renounced by the Jerusalem council,1 and was so soundly refuted by the Apostle Paul in Galatians, could make the kind of come-back that we see today. Yet is spreads like cancer among God’s people. Paul’s leaving Timothy behind at Ephesus was to counter the ‘Hebrew Roots’ heresy that was continually undermining his efforts to spread the Gospel among the nations. 1 Timothy 1:1-11 1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ, by the commandment of God our Savior and the Lord Jesus Christ, our hope, 2 To Timothy, a true son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord. 3 As I urged you when I went into Macedonia – remain in Ephesus that you may charge some that they teach no other doctrine, 4 nor give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which cause disputes rather than godly edification which is in faith. 5 Now the purpose of the commandment is love from a pure heart, from a good conscience, and from sincere faith, 6 from which some, having strayed, have turned aside to idle talk, 7 desiring to be teachers of the law, understanding neither what they say nor the things which they affirm. 8 But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, 9 knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine, 11 according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God which was committed to my trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Repent! Isaiah 11:1-10 Matthew 3:1-12 “In Those Days John The
    Repent! Isaiah 11:1-10 Matthew 3:1-12 “In those days John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness of Judea, proclaiming, ‘Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near.’” Leave it to the church to ruin the Christmas season. Just when we are getting in the spirit by putting up a wreath, picking out a tree, addressing cards, and playing our Philadelphia Orchestra Glorious Sounds of Christmas CD, the lectionary gives us this: a crazy man in the wilderness calling people a name whose actual translation I can only repeat among my friends in Wednesday morning Bible study with whom I feel safe (what’s said in Bible Study stays in Bible Study!); the lectionary gives us this: a wild man threatening eternal judgment unless we begin to bear fruit. What is Advent about anyway? In a word, John’s word, Advent is about repentance. It is a word that long ago dropped out of the vocabulary of even the most religious, so we need to begin this morning with a bit of homework. Look up repentance in the dictionary and you read that it is the act of expressing regret or remorse for wrongdoing or sin. In addition, Webster says darkly, see penitence, penitentiary. Early on, the church bought into this definition. Of the two words in Scripture that are rendered repentance in English, the Old Latin and Latin Vulgate favored one of those words. Paenitentia, see penitence, penance: prescribed prayers or acts designed to rid the soul and body of self-love. The problem with this first definition of repentance, from the perspective of our own theological tradition, is its secularity: repentance is something we can do to improve ourselves, albeit with the church’s imprimatur, but with no need of a redeemer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christology of Mark
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 1972 The Christology of Mark Gregory L. Jackson Wilfrid Laurier University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Jackson, Gregory L., "The Christology of Mark" (1972). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1511. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1511 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHRISTOLOGY OF MARK by Gregory L. Jackson A Thesis submitted to the Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree MASTER OF DIVINITY from Waterloo Lutheran Seminary Waterloo, Ontario May 30, 1972 n^^ty of *he Library "-'uo University College UMI Number: EC56448 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI EC56448 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml
    [Show full text]
  • “Repentance” Matthew 3:1-17 October 29, 2017 INTRODUCTION: Today Is Reformation Sunday, a Day on Which We Remember Marti
    “Repentance” Matthew 3:1-17 October 29, 2017 INTRODUCTION: Today is Reformation Sunday, a day on which we remember Martin Luther’s nailing of the 95 Theses on the door of the Wittenberg Castle Church. Today is a special Reformation Sunday because it marks the 500 th anniversary of that defining act. It was on October 31, 1517 that Luther posted his theses. So it is fitting this day that our passage should be on the topic of repentance, because Luther’s purpose with his 95 theses was to write a commentary on true repentance and to contrast that with false repentance. In his first thesis he announces his theme: “When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, ‘Repent,’ he wanted the whole life of believers to be a life of repentance.” Repentance was the theme of the preaching of both John the Baptist and of Jesus (Matt. 4:17). It is just as widely misunderstood in our day as in Luther’s. One of the most common of these misunderstandings is to regard repentance as something like a spiritual root canal: sometimes necessary, but in itself miserable. The best thing, then, is to do all you can to avoid it. While it is true that there is often an element of sorrow associated with repentance, the dominant emotion associated with it in the Bible is joy. The repentance of the prodigal son led to a joyful feast. Paul said that godly grief produces a repentance that “leads to salvation without regret” (2 Cor. 7:10). The reason repentance leads to joy is that it leads us to Jesus.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected]
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Liberty University Digital Commons Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Trends and Issues in Missions Center for Global Ministries 2009 Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_missions Recommended Citation Fanning, Don, "Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements" (2009). Trends and Issues in Missions. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_missions/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Global Ministries at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Trends and Issues in Missions by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pentecostal/Charismatic Movements Page 1 Pentecostal Movement The first two hundred years (100-300 AD) The emphasis on the spiritual gifts was evident in the false movements of Gnosticism and in Montanism. The result of this false emphasis caused the Church to react critically against any who would seek to use the gifts. These groups emphasized the gift of prophecy, however, there is no documentation of any speaking in tongues. Montanus said that “after me there would be no more prophecy, but rather the end of the world” (Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Vol II, p. 418). Since his prophecy was not fulfilled, it is obvious that he was a false prophet (Deut . 18:20-22). Because of his stress on new revelations delivered through the medium of unknown utterances or tongues, he said that he was the Comforter, the title of the Holy Spirit (Eusebius, V, XIV).
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL SESSION the Resurrection Is Central to the Faith
    SPECIAL SESSION The Resurrection is Central to the Faith SESSION SUMMARY Jesus’ resurrection points both backward and forward His followers. It points back to what Jesus has done in history through His life, death, and resurrection and God saving us and raising us spiritually. At the same time, Jesus’ resurrection points forward to the day when Christ will return and we will experience ultimate victory over sin and the final completion of our faith in Him. SCRIPTURE 1 Corinthians 15:1-28 46 Leader Guide / Special Session THE POINT Christianity stands or falls with the resurrection of Jesus. INTRO/STARTER 5-10 MINUTES Option 1 Over time, it has become popular in our culture to question even the possibility of miracles; however, of all the miracles that cause problems for those who reject the idea of them, Jesus’ resurrection is the most controversial, debated, and denied. Maybe some people find it easier to believe the parting of the Red Sea, manna appearing from heaven, or an endless supply of flour and oil than to believe in Jesus’ resurrection. Why is this one miracle so much more divisive than all the rest? Maybe because it is the one miracle that demands a personal decision about who Jesus is. The resurrection is essential to the gospel message because it displays God’s defense of the life and work of Jesus Christ. If you believe in the resurrection, then you are forced to believe Jesus is the Son of God. If you deny the resurrection, you continue in your rejection of Jesus. For this reason, the resurrection is one of the most important events in human history.
    [Show full text]
  • Maimonides the Laws of Repentance with Commentary
    MAIMONIDES THE LAWS OF REPENTANCE WITH COMMENTARY הועתק והוכנס לאינטרנט www.hebre wb ooks. org ע״י חיים תשס״ט by Rabbi David Shure Director of The Institute of Research for Biblical Talmudic Law Author of thefollowing books AyeletHashachar on Times, Dates, Measures Nidrai Torah on Tractate Nedarim Topics on Contemporary Medical Halacha A Rabbinical Divorce Ordered by the Civil Court Electricity and the Sabbath The Creation 0 IN EVERLASTING MEMORY Chaim Shlomoh Klein the son of Simcha Klein and his beloved wife Rivkah Ratzah Klein the daughter of Avraham and their beloved grandson Altar Chaim Shlomoh Klein the son of Simcha Zaev Klein may their memory be blessed (c) 2004 Institute of Researchfor Biblical Talmudic Law 914 45th St., Brooklyn, NY 11219 USA 1 Chapter Table of Contents Page Introduction 02 I The Commandment To Repent II What is Repentance III Mitzvos and Sins IV Deeds That Impede Repentance V Freedom of Will VI Divine Retribution for Unforgivable Sins VII Greatness of Repentance and Character Traits VIII Reward and Punishment in the World To Come IX Reward and Punishment in this World X Serving God Out of Love 2 Introduction The rules for repentance and forgiveness have many variables. Some of these variables are, whether there is a Holy Temple to bring sacrifices, the severity of the sin, one's intention when doing the sin, if he knows that he sinned, and if he forgot the sin. When GOD accepted our sacrifices instead of human suffering, we were closer to being forgiven for sin. The basic laws of repentance are not many nor are they complicated, however repentance is not a simple matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Concepts: Repentance, VZ Feb 1994
    Day5L2R05_Bible Concepts: Repentance, VZ Feb 1994 Bible Concepts: Repentance Repentance is a central and important part of Christian doctrine. This is easily noticed by reading the Bible. The proclamation of the Old Testament prophets were often sermons of repentance directed to individual listeners or entire nations. The New Testament time begins with a description of the activity of a rugged preacher of repentance, John the Baptist. Jesus began His public activity by proclaiming: "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye and believe the gospel" (Mark 1:15). The apostles and all Christians after them preached in the same way. Just the mere word repentance relates much about Christian faith. It teaches that the Christian proclamation does not exhort man in the spirit of Humanism to accept and fulfill himself or forget the past. It aims at giving up the old and rejecting it and becoming different. Thus, repentance is in close connection to doctrinal concepts such as conversion and new birth, mortifying and quickening, and penitence and faith, which together form repentance. Self Repentance It is exactly this sense of repentance that is difficult especially for an unbeliever to understand, unless he is taught and guided. A person whose conscience God has awakened considers the exhortation to repent in an outward manner. He readily begins--as Laestadius taught--to build his own repentanceor, in other words, clean and correct his everyday life. Socially already this is a good and respectable life. What else so seriously ails our times as immorality. But a person cannot be acceptable to God by proceeding in this way.
    [Show full text]