DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Market Economy History, Principles and Implementation – from a to Z

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Social Market Economy History, Principles and Implementation – From A to Z Social Market Economy History, Principles and Implementation – From A to Z Edited by Rolf H. Hasse, Hermann Schneider & Klaus Weigelt English edition © 2008 Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn, Germany All rights reserved While copyright in this publication as a whole is vested in Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh GmbH, Paderborn, Germany, copyright in the text rests with the individual contributors, and no section may be reproduced in whole or part without the express permission, in writing, of both the con- tributors and the publisher. It should be noted that any opinions expressed are the responsibility of the individual contributors and that Ferdinand Schöningh does not necessarily subscribe to the opinions of contributors. ISBN: 978-0-9802543-7-2 Produced by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 60 Hume Road Dunkeld 2196 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa PO Box 55012 Northlands 2116 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa Telephone: (+27 +11) 214-2900 Telefax: (+27 +11) 214-2913/4 E-mail: [email protected] www.kas.org.za Translator: Vera Leckie Language editors: Tracy Seider and Richard Proctor-Sims Layout and production: Tyrus Text and Design, South Africa Printing: Paarl Print, South Africa First published in German: Lexikon Soziale Marktwirtschaft – Wirtschaftspolitik von A bis Z ISBN 3-506-97018-6 © 2002 Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh GmbH, Paderborn, Germany Second updated and extended edition, 2005 The editors Prof. Dr Rolf H. Hasse was born in Berlin in 1940. He completed his undergrad- uate studies in economics in Münster, Westphalia and Cologne. Hasse graduated in 1967 and completed his doctorate (1973) and post-doctoral qualification (1981) in Cologne. From 1981 to 1998 he was Professor of Economics, in particular econom- ic policy, at the University of the Federal Armed Forces in Hamburg. Hasse was at the University of Leipzig from September 1998 to March 2006. Since March 2006 he has been acting manager of Fraunhofer-Zentrum für Mittel- und Osteuropa (MOEZ), Leipzig. His main focus of research and publications include economic policy, international business relations and European integration. Dr Hermann Schneider was born in Niederwalgern (near Frankfurt) in 1940. He completed his undergraduate studies in economics in Frankfurt and Marburg. After graduation he became a research assistant in Marburg, concentrating on economic policy. Schneider’s doctorate focused on development policy. He became a research assistant for the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) both in Germany and abroad. Schneider was the KAS national representative in Colombia (1977–1982), and director of the Science Project for Latin America (Buenos Aires) (1988–1994), where he was able to focus on socio-economic institutional order policy issues. Schneider was the KAS national representative in Chile from 1994 to 1996. Dip Vw (Master in Economics) Klaus Weigelt was born in Königsberg, Prussia, in 1941. He is an economist (Freiburg), and since 1971 he has been a KAS research associate both in Germany and abroad. Weigelt was director of the KAS Academy for 11 years (1981–1992), KAS national representative in Caracas, Venezuela (1975–1981), director of the KAS European Office in Brussels (1992–1998), and director of the KAS foreign branch in Budapest, Hungary (2002–2007). The main focus of his publications is institutional order policy and economic ethics in the social market economy. 7 Preface fter half a century of economic policy under the banner of the social market economy, the vast majority of Germans have accepted this as their country’s Aeconomic order. This is particularly due to the consistent implementation of the institutional order (Ordnungs) concept and the resulting rapid economic and social successes in the initial phases of the Federal Republic. However, insight into the context and functioning of the social market economy has declined considerably over the years, while its interpretation has become highly arbitrary. Vital institu- tional order policy principles of the social market economy have thus been diluted beyond recognition. In public debate the social market economy has become almost an empty formula that is used by all and sundry. In this way, the model of the social market economy has become an example of the continuation of an idea, even though its fundamental principles are often flawed in their implementation and its core is under threat. Economic policy in Germany is faced with enormous problems. At present, neither its economic aims nor its social aims are being satisfactorily achieved. Unresolved problems range from long-term unemployment to increasing demands on the welfare system, the dangers of renewed inflation and the unanswered ques- tions relating to an economic policy in a European context, as well as the worldwide challenges of globalisation, environmental problems and poverty. The social market economy in its conceptual form can offer answers to these questions and problems; however, these answers have become obscured, with the result that they are no longer clearly visible and are therefore not sufficiently used. The German and European economic policies are looking for direction and are currently going through an institutional order policy crisis. The aim of this volume is to clarify the concept of the social market economy in terms of economic and social policy and its political implementation. On the one hand, it is an attempt to retrace the origins and basic principles of the social market economy. On the other, it presents the different forms of social market economy, the need for adaptation in the light of recent challenges, the objections to social market economy and its prospects as a future economic and social system. The book is aimed at the younger generation, which has the impartiality, openness and critical attitude necessary for implementing reforms, as well as an openness to conceptual orientation. The editors and contributors have tried to summarise the essential aspects in short articles and to formulate the sometimes difficult factual issues in comprehensible 8 Preface language. Cross-referencing makes the book more user-friendly, while a glossary is included for the explanation of specialised terms and their relevance. In terms of work on the original German version, the editors are particularly grateful to Prof. Dr Hans Willgerodt for his suggestions regarding the conceptual unity of this work, to Marina Ignatjuk for her diligent work in coordinating and editing the contributions, and to Wolfgang Reeder for selecting the illustrations and diagrams. The editors would like to thank all the contributors for their punctual and diligent work. Particular thanks go to Joachim Hummel who managed and coordinated the complicated task of editing the original German second edition. Furthermore, we would like to thank the staff of the Institute for Economic Policy at the University of Leipzig and the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) in St. Augustin, which have both contributed to the book’s success in many ways. This english version is based on the second edition (2005) of the original German work, with updates where relevant. At a time of international upheaval of institu- tions and structures, its content responds to the lively interest in this subject as well as providing invaluable information on institutional order policy (Ordnungspolitik). Regarding this English version, we must acknowledge the translator Dr Vera Leckie and the English language editors Tracy Seider and Richard Proctor-Sims for their diligence and commitment to this challenging task. The editors would also like to thank the KAS Johannesburg office staff for their constructive collaboration in producing the English version of this book. KAS head office deserves thanks for its immediate and positive response to the idea, for its encouragement and support while the work was in progress, as well as for provid- ing the necessary funds. Rolf Hasse Hermann Schneider Klaus Weigelt Leipzig Bonn Budapest 9 Contents Alphabetical list of biographies and themes 11 Biographies 27 Themes 79 Glossary 477 Sub-division of themes 495 Abbreviations 503 List of tables, figures and other illustrations 505 List of contributors 507 Index Biographies and other personalities 515 Themes 517 Appendix Selected German economic research and advisory institutions 530 11 Alphabetical list of biographies and themes Biographies Beckerath, Erwin von 27 Norbert Kloten Böhm, Franz 29 Ulrich Immenga Briefs, Goetz A. 30 Anton Rauscher Dietze, Constantin von 31 Nils Goldschmidt Einaudi, Luigi 32 Hans Willgerodt Engels, Wolfram 33 Rolf H. Hasse Erhard, Ludwig Wilhem 34 Rainer Klump Eucken, Walter Kurt Heinrich 36 Lüder Gerken Frickhöffer, Wolfgang 39 Joachim Starbatty Hayek, Friedrich August von 40 Gerd Habermann Hensel, K. Paul 42 Gernot Gutmann Höffner, Joseph Kardinal 43 André Habisch 12 Alphabetical list of biographies Kamitz, Reinhard 45 Wolfgang Schmitz Karrenberg, Friedrich 47 Martin Honecker Lutz, Friedrich August 47 Verena Veit-Bachmann Meyer, Fritz W. 49 Helmut Gröner Miksch, Leonhard 50 Heinz-Dieter Smeets, Michael Sket Müller-Armack, Alfred 52 Friedrun Quaas Nell-Breuning, Oswald von 53 Lothar Roos Nipperdey, Hans Carl 57 Hans-Jürgen Papier Röpke, Wilhelm 58 Hans-Günter Krüsselberg Rueff, Jacques 60 Josef Molsberger Rüstow, Alexander 63 Jan Hegner Schiller, Karl 65 Egon Tuchtfeldt Schleyer, Hanns-Martin 67 Franz Schoser Schmölders, Günter 67 Horst Zimmermann Schreiber, Wilfrid 68 Heinz Lampert Alphabetical
Recommended publications
  • Competition in a Social Market Economy

    Competition in a Social Market Economy

    Competition in a Social Market economy Speech by Commissioner Monti at the Conference of the European Parliament and the European Commission on ‘Reform of European Competition law’ in Freiburg on 9/10 November 2000 Ladies and Gentlemen, Let me take my turn to welcome you to this conference that has been jointly organised by the European Parliament and the European Commission to discuss the Reform of EC competition policy. The Commission has launched a reform that aims at overhauling the whole of the competition law framework in order to ensure more efficient enforcement of the European competition rules and thereby reinforce their effect. A reform of this scope is an excellent opportunity to re-visit and to re-examine what is basic to our understanding. The venue here at Freiburg of course reminds us of the Freiburg School. The Freiburg School has made a major contribution to shaping the post-war economy as one of the sources of the concept of Soziale Marktwirtschaft – Social market economy. When we take a close look at what ‘Social Market Economy’ stands for, we find that we are in the presence of one of those basic concepts to which many policy choices can be traced back. We also realise that we are in the presence of strikingly modern ideas. Having said this, it is not my intention to discuss here the issue whether ‘Social Market economy’ is a model for Europe1 or whether the concept of Social Market Economy and the historic experience it encompasses is a major building block of what we sometimes call the ‘European Model’.
  • Index of Modern Social Market Economies

    Index of Modern Social Market Economies

    Index of Modern Social Market Economies Explorative Study Index of Modern Social Market Economies Explorative Study 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction 4 Defining a Modern Version of the Social Market Economy 6 Introduction 6 The Ordoliberal Concept of a (Social) Market Economy 9 Modernizing the Concept of a Social Market Economy 13 Operationalization 15 CATEGORY I: COMPETITIVE AND EFFICIENT MARKETS 16 CATEGORY II: EFFICIENT PROPERTY RIGHTS 18 CATEGORY III: ECONOMIC AND ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY 21 CATEGORY IV: SOCIAL INCLUSION 23 Country Selection 26 Conclusion 26 Index Results – Initial Findings 28 Compound Index Results – Executive Summary 28 Category I: Competitive and Efficient Markets 28 Open Markets 28 Effective Price System 32 Competition 33 Category II: Efficient Property Rights 34 Property Rights 34 Freedom of Contract 34 Liability 36 Private Insolvency Rules 36 Ratio Medium-sized Companies to Total Companies 37 Manager Liability 39 4 Table of Contents Category III: Economic and Ecological Sustainability 40 Financial Stability 40 Consistency of Policy 44 Efficient Environmental Protection 45 Category IV: Social Inclusion 47 Effective Labor Markets 47 Social Mobility 52 Outlook 58 Methodology 59 Data Sources 59 Data Standardization 60 Index Aggregation 62 Calculation of Results 62 Robustness Checks 68 Appendix 85 Production Credits 122 5 Introduction INTRODUCTION Stefan Empter, Cortnie Shupe The current global financial and economic crisis has provoked widespread debate in market econo- mies around the world about how to regain a balance between profit and liability, efficiency and equity and between growth and social-ecological justice in national economic and social orders. Against this background, many, in particular in Europe, have become interested again in the social market economy model as a framework for responsible capitalism.
  • Smes in the Idea of Ludwig Erhard's Social Market Economy

    Smes in the Idea of Ludwig Erhard's Social Market Economy

    SMEs in the idea of Ludwig Erhard’s Social Market Economy Matthias Schäfer Head of Team Economic Policy Konrad-Adenauer-Foundation, Berlin 4 The „Entrepreneur“ in the eyes Ludwig Erhard Matthias Schäfer Head of Team Economic Policy [email protected] Schmöckwitz, 22 August 2018 www.kas.de Content › Ludwig Erhard and the model of Social Market Economy › The role of entrepreneurship in a Social Market Economy: The „honourable“ entrepreneur › The current situation of entrepreneurship in Germany The „Entrepreneur“ Ludwig Erhard › 4 February 1897 – 5 May 1977 › 1949-1963 Minister of Economic affairs › Chief architect of the „Social market economy“ and the „economic miracle“ › 1963-1966 Chancellor of West Germany The „Entrepreneur“ 7 © Bundesarchiv The social market economy › Is based on „free entrepreneurship“ › Has an economic and socio-political function › Regulatory Policy instead of Planned Economy The „Entrepreneur“ 8 © Bundesarchiv Economic Models after WW II Laissez-faire liberalism Socialistic Centralised Economies e.g.: UdSSR e.g.: : USA 1. Socialism will always fail!! 2. Capitalism (understood as laissez-faire liberalism) is curable!! The social market economy How to cure capitalism? Keynesian thinking: • Public intervention during an ecomimic crises via fiscal policy or monetary policy • Public withdrawing in times of ecomic upsing Ordoliberal thinking of founding fathers of Social Market Economy (Walter Eucken, Freiburg School of Economics): • Public framework for the markets (automatic stabilisation in opposition to market
  • Central Europe

    Central Europe

    Central Europe West Germany FOREIGN POLICY wTHEN CHANCELLOR Ludwig Erhard's coalition government sud- denly collapsed in October 1966, none of the Federal Republic's major for- eign policy goals, such as the reunification of Germany and the improvement of relations with its Eastern neighbors, with France, NATO, the Arab coun- tries, and with the new African nations had as yet been achieved. Relations with the United States What actually brought the political and economic crisis into the open and hastened Erhard's downfall was that he returned empty-handed from his Sep- tember visit to President Lyndon B. Johnson. Erhard appealed to Johnson for an extension of the date when payment of $3 billion was due for military equipment which West Germany had bought from the United States to bal- ance dollar expenses for keeping American troops in West Germany. (By the end of 1966, Germany paid DM2.9 billion of the total DM5.4 billion, provided in the agreements between the United States government and the Germans late in 1965. The remaining DM2.5 billion were to be paid in 1967.) During these talks Erhard also expressed his government's wish that American troops in West Germany remain at their present strength. Al- though Erhard's reception in Washington and Texas was friendly, he gained no major concessions. Late in October the United States and the United Kingdom began talks with the Federal Republic on major economic and military problems. Relations with France When Erhard visited France in February, President Charles de Gaulle gave reassurances that France would not recognize the East German regime, that he would advocate the cause of Germany in Moscow, and that he would 349 350 / AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, 1967 approve intensified political and cultural cooperation between the six Com- mon Market powers—France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg.
  • Rise of Illiberal Civil Society W

    Rise of Illiberal Civil Society W

    Executive Summary This publication examines the growing influence of illiberal, anti-Western and socially conservative civil society groups, popular movements and political forces in five post-Soviet states: Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and Moldova. It finds that illiberal social attitudes remain prevalent across the region, particularly in relation to LGBTI rights, and that they are increasingly being used as opportunities for political mobilisation within these societies. While there have been attempts to create illiberal civil society groups that mirror pro- Western/liberal NGOs or think-tanks, they remain significantly less influential than the institutions and groups linked to the dominant religious organisations in these countries such as the Orthodox Church, or political factions with influence over state resources. What is clear, however, particularly in Ukraine and Georgia, is that there has been a significant rise in far-right and nationalist street movements, alongside smaller but active homophobic gangs. These ‘uncivil rights movements’ still lack broad public support but their political energy and rate of growth is influencing the wider politics of the region. It is clear that illiberal civil society is on the rise in these five countries but it is growing in its own way rather than simply aping its liberal counterparts. Russia has an important role in the rise of illiberal civil society across the region, in particular the way it has disseminated and promoted the concept of ‘traditional values’; however it is important to recognise that while some groups have direct or indirect contact with Russia, many do not and that the primary drivers of such activity are to be found in the local societies of the countries at hand.
  • A Comparative Study of the Major Economic Systems in the Aftermath of the Great Recession

    A Comparative Study of the Major Economic Systems in the Aftermath of the Great Recession

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive A Comparative Study of the Major Economic Systems in the aftermath of the Great Recession Shaikh, Salman December 2009 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/19588/ MPRA Paper No. 19588, posted 25 Dec 2009 10:51 UTC A Comparative Study of the Major Economic Systems in the aftermath of the Great Recession S a l m a n A h m e d S h a i k h M S ( S z a b i s t , K a r a c h i ) L e c t u r e r , U n i v e r s i t y o f E a s t , H y d e r a b a d [email protected] A Comparative Study of the Major Economic Systems in the aftermath of the Great Recession Abstract This paper compares the fundamental postulates of major economic systems i.e. Capitalism, Socialism, Mixed economy (a hybrid of Capitalism and Socialism) and the Islamic economic system. It identifies through a review of theoretical economics the structural problems that lie in the current economic order. Poverty and Inequality have increased in last two decades and the millennium development goals are still far from achieved. The research identifies that lack of an ethical foundation, unbridled pursuit of self interest in production as well as in consumption, interest based financial ad monetary system are the major problematic issues in Capitalism against which mixed economy has also shown limited effectiveness. Socialism promises to create heaven on earth, but takes fundamental human rights and profit motive away and in the extreme case give way for an autocratic or totalitarian regime.
  • Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory

    Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory

    To Our Dead: Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory by Jeffrey P. Luppes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Germanic Languages and Literatures) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Andrei S. Markovits, Chair Professor Geoff Eley Associate Professor Julia C. Hell Associate Professor Johannes von Moltke © Jeffrey P. Luppes 2010 To My Parents ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a dissertation is a long, arduous, and often lonely exercise. Fortunately, I have had unbelievable support from many people. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor and dissertation committee chair, Andrei S. Markovits. Andy has played the largest role in my development as a scholar. In fact, his seminal works on German politics, German history, collective memory, anti-Americanism, and sports influenced me intellectually even before I arrived in Ann Arbor. The opportunity to learn from and work with him was the main reason I wanted to attend the University of Michigan. The decision to come here has paid off immeasurably. Andy has always pushed me to do my best and has been a huge inspiration—both professionally and personally—from the start. His motivational skills and dedication to his students are unmatched. Twice, he gave me the opportunity to assist in the teaching of his very popular undergraduate course on sports and society. He was also always quick to provide recommendation letters and signatures for my many fellowship applications. Most importantly, Andy helped me rethink, re-work, and revise this dissertation at a crucial point.
  • The Social and Ecological Market Economy – a Model for Asian Development?

    The Social and Ecological Market Economy – a Model for Asian Development?

    Sector Network Sustainable Economic Development Asia Division 41 Economic Development and Employment The Social and Ecological Market Economy – A Model for Asian Development? The Social and Ecological Market Economy – A Model for Asian Development? Published by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Postfach 5180 65726 Eschborn T + 49 61 96 79 – 0 Internet: www.gtz.de Executive Editors: Corinna Küsel Dr. Ulrike Maenner Ricarda Meissner Contact: Corinna Küsel Head of Section Economic Policy and Private Sector Development GTZ Eschborn [email protected] Dr. Ulrike Maenner Chief Technical Advisor Macroeconomic Reform Program GTZ in Vietnam [email protected] Ricarda Meissner Chief Advisor of the EU-Vietnam Private Sector Support Program [email protected] Text Editor: Dr. Marianne Scholte Coordinator: Katja Röckel Cover Design and Layout: Kuhrt Kommunikation GmbH, Düsseldorf Printed by KlarmannDruck GmbH, 65799 Kelkheim May 2008 Contents Foreword .......7 Notes on the Contributors .......9 Part 1 Overall Perspectives .....22 Social and Ecological Market Economy – A General Overview .....23 Dieter W. Benecke Contributing to Asian Development – German Technical ......53 Cooperation and the Relevance of the Social and Ecological Market Economy Cornelia Richter Part 2 Academic Perspectives ....70 German Economic Policy at a Crossroads .....71 Eckhard Hein and Achim Truger Social Market Economy 2.0 – An Appraisal in the Light of Current .....83 Reforms Carolin Welzel and Robert Vehrkamp Pro-poor Growth in
  • Karl Mannheim's Jewish Question

    Karl Mannheim's Jewish Question

    Religions 2012, 3, 228–250; doi:10.3390/rel3020228 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article Karl Mannheim’s Jewish Question David Kettler 1,* and Volker Meja 2 1 Bard College, Annandale, New York 12504, USA 2 Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John‘s NL, Canada A1C 5S7; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +845-876-5293. Received: 5 January 2012; in revised form: 26 March 2012 / Accepted: 6 April 2012 / Published: 11 April 2012 Abstract: In this paper, we explore Karl Mannheim‘s puzzling failure (or refusal) to address himself in any way to questions arising out of the position of Jews in Germany, either before or after the advent of Nazi rule—and this, notwithstanding the fact, first, that his own ethnic identification as a Jew was never in question and that he shared vivid experiences of anti-Semitism, and consequent exile from both Hungary and Germany, and, second, that his entire sociological method rested upon using one‘s own most problematic social location—as woman, say, or youth, or intellectual—as the starting point for a reflexive investigation. It was precisely Mannheim‘s convictions about the integral bond between thought grounded in reflexivity and a mission to engage in a transformative work of Bildung that made it effectively impossible for him to formulate his inquiries in terms of his way of being Jewish. It is through his explorations of the rise and fall of the intellectual as socio-cultural formation that Mannheim investigates his relations to his Jewish origins and confronts the disaster of 1933.
  • Nascita E Sviluppo Dell'ordoliberalismo

    Nascita E Sviluppo Dell'ordoliberalismo

    SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE CLASSE DI LETTERE E FILOSOFIA CORSO DI PERFEZIONAMENTO IN FILOSOFIA NASCITA E SVILUPPO DELL’ORDOLIBERALISMO DALLA CRISI DI WEIMAR ALLA REPUBBLICA FEDERALE TEDESCA 1929-1949 Candidato LORENZO MESINI Relatore Prof. CARLO GALLI Tutor Prof. ROBERTO ESPOSITO ANNO ACCADEMICO 2019/2020 NASCITA E SVILUPPO DELL’ORDOLIBERALISMO DALLA CRISI DI WEIMAR ALLA REPUBBLICA FEDERALE TEDESCA 1929-1949 Un sincero e doveroso ringraziamento a tutti coloro che hanno incoraggiato e sostenuto la realizzazione di questa ricerca. Ringrazio in primo luogo tutti i docenti della Scuola Normale che in vario modo hanno fornito il loro prezioso supporto durante gli anni trascorsi a Pisa: Roberto Esposito, per la fiducia con cui mi ha accolto nel programma di perfezionamento della Scuola; Michele Ciliberto, Daniele Menozzi e Silvio Pons per l’importante lavoro svolto nei seminari annuali di Storia della filosofia e Storia contemporanea. Senza di essi non avrei potuto consolidare in maniera adeguata le mie conoscenze storiche e il percorso di perfezionamento presso la Scuola sarebbe inevitabilmente risultato incompleto. Un ringraziamento particolare a Roberto Scazzieri dell’Università di Bologna, per aver seguito con preziosi consigli lo sviluppo del lavoro, per avermi introdotto sapientemente allo studio della storia dell’analisi economica e per l’importante soggiorno di ricerca che mi ha consentito di svolgere presso l’Università di Cambridge (UK); a Carlo Galli, infine, per il sostegno che mi ha fornito costantemente durante tutte le fasi del mio percorso. Al suo supporto e al suo insegnamento devo gran parte dei risultati conseguiti lungo il mio percorso formativo e di ricerca; a lui devo i miei più sinceri ringraziamenti.
  • Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy

    Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy

    brazilianpoliticalsciencereview ARTICLE Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy Angelo Segrillo Department of History, University of São Paulo Liberalism and Marxism are two schools of thought which have left deep imprints in sociological, political and economic theory. They are usually perceived as opposite, rival approaches. In the field of democracy there is a seemingly in- surmountable rift around the question of political versus economic democracy. Liberals emphasize the former, Marxists the latter. Liberals say that economic democracy is too abstract and fuzzy a concept, therefore one should concentrate on the workings of an objective political democracy. Marxists insist that political democracy without economic democracy is insufficient. The article argues that both propositions are valid and not mutually exclu- sive. It proposes the creation of an operational, quantifiable index of economic democracy that can be used alongside the already existing indexes of political democracy. By using these two indexes jointly, political and economic democracy can be objectively evaluated. Thus, the requirements of both camps are met and maybe a more dialogical approach to democracy can be reached in the debate between liberals and Marxists. The joint index is used to evaluate the levels of economic and political democracy in the transition countries of Eastern Europe. Keywords: democratic theory; transition countries; economic democracy Introduction iberalism and Marxism are two schools of thought which have left deep imprints Lin political, sociological and economic theory. Both have been very fruitful in il- luminating a wide range of common issues across these fields and yet are usually perceived 8 bpsr Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy as opposite, rival approaches contradicting each other in general.
  • The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany's Approach to the Euro Crisis

    The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany's Approach to the Euro Crisis

    brief policy The long shadow of ordoliberalism: germany’s approach To The euro crisis sebastian dullien and ulrike guérot At the end of January, European leaders agreed the wording SUMMARY The new treaty agreed by European leaders of the new treaty aimed primarily at tightening fiscal policy in in January reflects Germany’s distinctive the euro area that was agreed in principle by 26 EU heads of approach to the euro crisis rather than collective government at last December’s European summit. The treaty compromise. Much to the frustration of many reflects German positions rather than collective compromise. other eurozone countries, Germany has imposed In particular, the treaty centres on a “fiscal compact” that its own approach – centred on austerity and price stability at the expense of economic growth compels all eurozone countries to incorporate into their – on others without considering whether the constitutions a deficit limit modelled on the German institutional flaws of monetary union beyond a Schuldenbremse, or “debt brake”. In addition, European lack of fiscal control may be the cause of some leaders once again ruled out the possibility of using European of the distortions and problems that the current Central Bank (ECB) funds to “leverage” the European euro crisis has exposed or whether its approach Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) or European Stability could have a negative impact on other eurozone Mechanism (ESM), and there was no mention of ECB bond countries. German economic orthodoxy has been widely criticised elsewhere in Europe. purchases to help stabilise bond markets. This brief explores the historical and ideological However, although the new treaty reflects views that are foundations of German economic thinking supported by a broad consensus in Germany (strict opposition and discusses how it differs from mainstream to ECB intervention and a one-sided focus on fiscal austerity), international economic discourse.