Archeological Investigations of Minute Man National Historical Park
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Archeological Investigations of Minute Man National Historical Park Volume II: An Estimation Approach to Prehistoric Sites Duncan Ritchie Marsha K. King Christy Vogt Patricia Fragola The Public Archaeology Laboratory, Inc. 387 Lonsdale Avenue Pawtucket, RI 02860 Contract No. CX1600-9-0021 Cultural Resources Management Study No. 23 Division of Cultural Resources Management North Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Boston, Massachusetts 1990 Table of Contents Page List of Figures vii List of Tables xi Acknowledgments xiii Management Summary xv Chapter 1 Introduction Overview: Problem Orientation 5 Environmental Settings 6 Geomorphology and Geology 6 Drainage Patterns 9 Past Environmental Settings 13 Present Conditions in the Project Area 17 Prehistoric Land Use and Settlement: General Overview 19 Historic,al-Period Land Use: General Overview 33 Concord 33 Lincoln 40 Lexington 41 Summary of Historical Agricultural Land Use 41 Chapter 2 Research Design and Strategies 49 Theoretical Orientation and Research Questions 49 Background Research, Archeological Sensitivity Stratification, and the Estimation Approach 52 Background Research 52 Stratification Scheme 56 Estimation Approach 57 Expected Results of the Archeological Survey 59 Field Methodology and Sampling Strategy 59 Laboratory and Analytical Methods 64 Prehistoric Cultural Material 65 Historical-Period Cultural Material 66 Chapter 3 Results 73 Background Research: Archeological Sensitivity Stratification 73 Existing Data Base 73 Expectations 76 Table of Contents (cont.) Page Subsurface Investigations: Prehistoric Period Cultural Resources 76 Evaluation of Stratification Scheme and the Estimation Approach at MIMA 96 Subsurface Investigations: Historical-Period Cultural Resources 101 Analysis of Recovered Historical-Period Cultural Material 103 Patterns of Refuse Disposal 103 Agricultural Practices, Manure, and Field Trash 106 Temporal and Spatial Associations of the Historical-Period Cultural Material 107 Chapter 4 Archeological Significance and Recommendations 113 Archeological Significance and Historical Contexts 113 Historical Context No. 1: Prehistoric Settlement/Land Use Systems in the Southern Merrimack River Basin, 9500 to 400 B.P. 115 Summary 115 Historical Context No. 2: Lithic Resource Use in an Interior Drainage, ca. 8500 to 500 B.P 119 Summary 120 Historical Context No. 3: Rural/Peripheral Settlement/Land Use, 18th to 2Qth Century 122 Historical Context No. 4: Transportation Networks in Eastern Massachusetts, 17th to 20th Century 123 Significance and Recommendations for Identified Prehistoric Cultural Resources 124 Recommendations for Additional Inventory and Evaluation 129 Significance and Recommendations for Identified Historical-Period Cultural Resources 130 Recommendations for Additional Inventory and Evaluation 132 Considerations for Further Research Relating to Refuse Disposal Behavior and Field Trash 132 References Cited 135 Appendix A: Prehistoric Sites 147 Inventory of Cultural Material by Site 162 iv Table of Contents (cont.) Page Appendix B: Historical Sites 171 Historical Site Forms 172 v List of Figures Figure Page 1-1 Map of state of Massachusetts showing location of Minute Man National Historical Park 2 1-2 Location of Minute Man National Historical Park on USGS Concord quadrangle map 3 1-3 ACMP base map of Minute Man National Historical Park showing major subdivisions 4 1-4 Location of Minute Man National Historical Park in relation to major physiographic provinces in southern New England (Fenneman 1938) 7 1-5 Location of Minute Man National Historical Park in relation to major river drainages in eastern Massachusetts 12 1-6 Location of 12 previously known prehistoric sites within or in close proximity to Minute Man National Historical Park (Baker 1980) 20 1-7 Graph of populations for towns of Concord, Lodngton and Lincoln, Massachusetts, 1765-1980 39 2-1 Typical 30 m x 30 m block with staggered grid test pit pattern used as sampling unit 61 2-2 Template used to divide UTM grid into 25, 30 m x 30 m sampling units 62 2-3 Formula for calculating mean ceramic date 67 3-1 Stratification of North Bridge section of MIMA into zones of expected archeological sensitivity 77 3-2 Stratification of Meriam's Corner/Hardy Hill section of MIMA into zones of expected archaeological sensitivity 78 vii List of Figures (cont.) Figure Page 3-3 Stratification of Old Bedford Road section of MIMA into zones of expected archeological sensitivity 79 3-4 Stratification of Virginia Road section of MIMA into zones of expected archeological sensitivity 80 3-5 Stratification of Nelson Road section of MIMA into zones of expected archeological sensitivity 81 3-6 Stratification of Fiske Hill section of MIMA into zones of expected archeological sensitivity 82 3-7 Location of subsurface testing within the Hardy Hill area (Ox Pasture site) 85 3-8 Location of subsurface testing within the Elm Brook/Old Bedford Road area (Holt Pasture, Joshua Brooks Farm P1 sites) 86 3-9 Location of subsurface testing within the Virginia Road/Bedford Lane area (William Smith Farm Pl, P2 site) 87 3-10 Location of subsurface testing within the Folly Pond area (Aaron Brooks Farm P1, Ephraim Hartwell Farm P1, P2, P3, P4 sites) 88 3-11 Location of subsurface testing within the Paul Revere Capture site area (Jacob Foster Farm P1 site) 89 3-12 Location of subsurface testing within the Nelson Road area (Thomas Nelson Jr. Farm P1, P2 sites) 90 3-13 Location of subsurface testing within the Massachusetts Avenue/Marrett Road area (Whittemore Farm P1 site) 91 3-14 Location of subsurface testing within the Fiske Hill area 92 viii List of Figures (cont.) Figure Page 3-15 Location of historical-period cultural resources identified during survey within Minute Man National Historical Park 102 A-1 Representative soil profiles from test pits excavated within MIMA 168 B-1 Sketch map of Ox Pasture site, cart path and stone bridge 173 B-2 Photograph of Ox Pasture site, cart path and stone bridge 174 B-3 Sketch Map of Thomas Brooks Farm site, barn/outbuilding 176 E-4 Photograph of Thomas Brooks Farm site, barn/outbuilding 176 B-5 Sketch map of William Smith Farm site, foundation 181 B-6 Sketch map of Ephraim Hartwell Farm site, foundation 184 B - 7 Location of Ephraim Hartwell Farm site, 20th century, filled foundation 188 B-8 Sketch map of Samuel Hartwell Farm site, cellar hole 198 B-9 Photograph of Samuel Hartwell Farm site, cellar hole, southwest wall 199 B-10 Profile of Samuel Hartwell Farm site, cellar hole, southwest wall 200 ix List of Tables Table Page 1-1 General chronology of vegetation patterns in southern New England ca. 14,000 to 1,000 years before present 14 1-2 Identified prehistoric sites within the Assabet, Concord, and Sudbury River Drainages 25 1-3 Historical-period cultural chronology for Concord, Lincoln, and Lexington, Massachusetts 34 Population of the towns of Concord, Lexington, and Lincoln in Middlesex County, Massachusetts 38 1-5 Land use in Concord, Massachusetts, 1749-1850 44 1-6 Agricultural production statistics for Concord, Massachusetts, 1749-1850 45 2-1 Locational attributes used to define environmental settings 54 2-2 Environmental/locational attribute sets and values 55 2-3 Dating ranges based on stem diameters of clay tobacco pipes and formula for calculating mean pipe stem date 68 2-4 Dating ranges based on method of manufacture of nails 69 3-1 Frequencies of occurrence of soil types on a sample of known prehistoric sites near MIMA 74 3-2 Distribution of temporal components in a sample of known prehistoric sites near MIMA 83 3-3 Sampling units and prehistoric sites within designated areas 93 3-4 Locational attributes and structural characteristics of prehistoric sites identified within MIMA 95 3-5 Estimated sample size for high and moderate sensitivity strata based on 1% sample 98 xi List of Tables (Cont.) Table Page 3-6 Estimated frequencies of prehistoric sites within five areas based on 10% random sample 99 3-7 Estimated frequencies of prehistoric sites within areas of MIMA after completion of random sampling 100 3-8 Estimated frequencies of prehistoric sites for the entire high and moderate sensitivity strata 100 3-9 Distribution of historical-period cultural materials with regard to historical and modern structures and roads by area and block number 104 3-10 Distances, historical-period cultural material and plow zone data collected by testing block and area 109 4-1 Summary of the historical contexts for prehistoric and historic period cultural resources identified at MIMA 116 4-2 Significance and recommendations for identified prehistoric period cultural resources 125 4-3 Significance and recommendations for identified historical period cultural resources 131 A-1 Cultural material recovered from prehistoric sites 162 B-1 Cultural material recovered from the Thomas Brook Farm site, barn/outbuilding 178 B-2 Cultural material recovered from William Smith Farm site, foundation 182 B-3 Cultural material recovered from Ephraim Hartwell Farm site, foundation 185 B-4 Cultural material recovered from Ephraim Hartwell Farm site, 20th century, filled foundation 189 B-5 Cultural material recovered from Samuel Hartwell Farm site, cellar hole 201 xii Acknowledgments The Public Archaeology Laboratory, Inc. staff involved in this archeological investigation of MIMA would lilce to acknowledge the assistance of a number of persons. Staff