DOCSLIB.ORG

MEC In-Person Dietary Interviewers Procedures Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MEC In-Person Dietary Interviewers Procedures Manual MEC In-Person Dietary Interviewers Procedures Manual January 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1 OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY ............................................................................ 1-1 1.1 History ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Goals of the Survey............................................................................. 1-4 1.3 NHANES Data Accomplishments...................................................... 1-4 1.4 National Center for Health Statistics .................................................. 1-6 1.5 Sample Selection................................................................................. 1-6 1.6 Field Organization for NHANES ....................................................... 1-7 1.7 Exams and Interviews in the Mobile Examination Center (MEC) ..... 1-10 1.7.1 Exam Sessions..................................................................... 1-11 1.7.2 Exam Team Responsibilities............................................... 1-12 1.7.3 Examination Components ................................................... 1-13 1.7.4 Sample Person Remuneration ............................................. 1-20 1.7.5 Report of Exam Findings .................................................... 1-20 1.7.6 Dry Run Day ....................................................................... 1-21 1.8 Integrated Survey Information System (ISIS) .................................... 1-22 1.9 Confidentiality and Professional Ethics.............................................. 1-22 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE DIETARY INTERVIEW................................... 2-1 2.1 Dietary Interview Component in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey ............................................................ 2-1 2.2 The Role of the Dietary Interviewer ................................................... 2-3 2.3 Other Duties of the Dietary Interviewer ............................................. 2-4 2.4 Observers and MEC Visitors .............................................................. 2-5 3 EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES, AND MATERIALS............................................ 3-1 3.1 Description of the MEC Interview Room and Equipment.................. 3-1 3.2 MEC Interview Supplies and Other Equipment ................................. 3-1 3.2.1 Measuring Guides ............................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Tape Recorder ..................................................................... 3-3 3.3 MEC Dietary Interviewer Materials ................................................... 3-3 3.3.1 Handcards............................................................................ 3-4 3.3.2 Reminder Cards................................................................... 3-4 3.3.3 Measuring Guide Package................................................... 3-4 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Page 3.3.4 Audiotape Consent Forms................................................... 3-5 3.4 Equipment Setup and Teardown Procedures ...................................... 3-5 3.4.1 MEC Dietary Interview Room Setup Procedures ............... 3-5 3.4.2 MEC Dietary Interview Room Teardown Procedures ........ 3-10 4 GENERAL INTERVIEWING TECHNIQUES............................................... 4-1 4.1 Before Beginning the Interview.......................................................... 4-1 4.2 Activities and Resources Helpful to Your Interview.......................... 4-1 4.2.1 Getting Oriented to a New Community .............................. 4-1 4.2.2 Helpful Contacts.................................................................. 4-2 4.2.3 Beginning the Interview...................................................... 4-3 4.3 Administering the Interview ............................................................... 4-4 4.3.1 Asking the Questions .......................................................... 4-5 4.3.2 Maintaining Rapport ........................................................... 4-7 4.3.3 Difficult Situations.............................................................. 4-8 4.3.4 Incomplete Information....................................................... 4-8 4.4 Probing................................................................................................ 4-9 4.4.1 What is Probing and Why is it Necessary ........................... 4-9 4.4.2 Probing Inappropriate Responses........................................ 4-10 4.4.3 Probing Methods Should be Neutral ................................... 4-11 4.4.4 Kinds of Probes................................................................... 4-11 4.4.5 The Don’t Know (DK) Response........................................ 4-13 4.4.6 Additional Guidelines for Probing ...................................... 4-13 4.4.7 When to Stop Probing ......................................................... 4-14 4.5 General Rules for Recording Answers ............................................... 4-14 4.6 Ending the Interview........................................................................... 4-15 5 DIETARY INTERVIEW APPLICATION FEATURES ................................ 5-1 5.1 General Overview of Computer.......................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Keyboard............................................................................. 5-1 5.1.2 Dietary Interview Application Features .............................. 5-4 5.1.3 Turning Computer On and Accessing the Program ............ 5-15 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Page 6 CONDUCTING THE 24-HOUR DIETARY RECALL INTERVIEW........... 6-1 6.1 Introduction of the MEC 24-Hour Dietary Recall using the USDA Automated Multiple Pass (AMPM) instrument.................................. 6-1 6.2 Key Features of the 24-Hour Dietary Recall....................... 6-2 6.3 Introduction to Respondent................................................................. 6-4 6.4 Step 1: The Quick List Pass (QL)....................................................... 6-4 6.4.1 The Main Food List (MFL)................................................. 6-10 6.4.2 Leaving the Quick List (QL) Pass....................................... 6-20 6.5 Step 2: The Forgotten Foods List (FFL)............................................. 6-21 6.6 Step 3: The Time and Occasion Pass (T/O)........................................ 6-27 6.7 Step 4: The Detail and Review Cycle (DRC) ..................................... 6-34 6.7.1 Measuring Guide Instructions Screen ................................. 6-36 6.7.2 Midnight to First Occasion Probe ....................................... 6-37 6.7.3 Collecting Details and Amounts ......................................... 6-38 6.7.4 Food Source Question ......................................................... 6-84 6.7.5 Review of Occasion ............................................................ 6-92 6.7.6 Occasion Location Question ............................................... 6-94 6.7.7 Between Interval Probe....................................................... 6-96 6.7.8 Last Occasion to Midnight Probe........................................ 6-97 6.7.9 Collection of Remainder Foods........................................... 6-98 6.8 Step 5: The Final Review Probe (FR)................................................. 6-99 6.9 Intake Health-Related Questions ........................................................ 6-100 6.9.1 Usual Intake ........................................................................ 6-101 6.9.2 Source of Plain Drinking Water.......................................... 6-102 6.9.3 Salt Use Questions .............................................................. 6-103 6.9.4 Following a Special Diet..................................................... 6-106 6.10 Dietary Recall Section Status ............................................................. 6-112 7 CONDUCTING THE POST-RECALL QUESTIONS.................................... 7-1 7.1 General Overview of the Post-Recall Section .................................... 7-1 7.2 Fish and Shellfish Questions............................................................... 7-2 7.3 Food Security Questions..................................................................... 7-4 7.4 Child Recent Health Questions........................................................... 7-7 v TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Page 7.5 Child Pesticide Use Questions............................................................ 7-8 7.6 Scheduling a Phone Follow-up Interview........................................... 7-9 7.7 Observations Questions ...................................................................... 7-18 7.8 Post-Recall Section Status .................................................................. 7-20 8 ADDITIONAL INTAKE PROCEDURES...................................................... 8-1 8.1 Proxy and Assisted Interviews............................................................ 8-1 8.1.1 Proxy Interviews with Child SPs Under 9 Years of Age .... 8-2 8.1.2 Assisted Interviews with Child SPs 9 to 11 Years Old ....... 8-3 8.1.3 Proxy or Assisted Interviews with Adults Unable to Report for Themselves ........................................................ 8-3 8.2 Interviewing Children......................................................................... 8-3 8.3 Data Retrieval Procedures .................................................................. 8-4 8.3.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nestlé in the United States Meeting Society’S Needs by Creating Shared Value Letter from the Ceos
    Nestlé in the United States Meeting society’s needs by Creating Shared Value Letter From the CEOs At Nestlé, we are committed to becoming the very best Nutrition, Health and Wellness company. Achieving this means doing more than just providing consumers and their pets with great-tasting, nutritious food and beverages. It means creating value for our employees, customers, consumers and their families, as well as society at large. We call this approach Creating Shared Value. Creating Shared Value is a way of doing business that goes beyond philanthropy. It is a basic principle of our business strategy and fundamental to our overall success as a company. For our business to prosper in the long term, we must create value for shareholders and society in a manner that is integrally linked to our core business strategies and operations. Globally, Nestlé’s Creating Shared Value focuses on the areas of nutrition, water and rural development. • Since its founding in Switzerland more than 140 years ago, Nestlé has achieved long-term profi table growth by providing nutritious products that improve the health of its consumers. As a result, Nestlé today is the world’s largest Nutrition, Health and Wellness company. • A business must operate in an environmentally sustainable manner, in a way that provides for current needs without compromising the Earth’s resources for use and enjoyment by future generations. Nestlé works diligently in this area, with a special focus on water resources. • Economic development, particularly rural development, is key to improving the lives of farmers and rural communities. Nestlé has been contributing to economic development over many decades, primarily through our work with farmers and through our 456 factories, half of which are in the developing world, and most of which are in rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship
    Good Food, Good Life Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship Table of contents Case studies 3 Message from the CEO 17 From spas to a world market The history of bottled water around the world 5 Water, a scarce and renewable resource 23 France Sustainable development around sources 7 Nestlé, the world’s leading food 24 Argentina and beverage company Strengthening water resource protection 25 France 8 Nestlé’s commitment Preventing forest fires to sustainable water use 28 France 13 The Nestlé Water Policy Préférence, a partnership for sustainable milk production 14 Sustainable economic growth 31 Egypt Closed loop circuits to reduce water 18 Water and the environment and energy consumption 21 The water cycle 31 South Africa 22 Actively protecting water resources Saving water through employee involvement 27 Water in the Nestlé supply chain 32 Italy 44 The Nestlé Environmental Management System Optimising water use in factories 47 Environmental sponsorship 34 India Continuously improving waste water 50 Social aspects management 52 Relations with employees 34 Thailand 54 Meeting consumer needs Recycling suitable water streams 56 Involvement in the community 38 France Innovating the glassmaking process 61 Nestlé Research and Development 40 Vietnam Packaging renovation improves 63 The future environmental performance 40 Saudi Arabia A new life for plastic caps 46 Environmental management system Appointing “Environmental Guards” 48 From Italy to Tibet Cleaning up “the roof of the world” 49 Hungary Preserving Balaton National Park 53 Nestlé Waters Alacarte training to improve performance 57 USA, Mexico, Philippines and France Educating the water stewards of the future 58 South Africa Capacity building in water resource management 59 France, USA, Spain Water education through guided tours and exhibitions Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship 2 3 Message from the CEO Water is essential for life.
    [Show full text]
  • Boycott News
    BOYCOTT NEWS Tap into the talent FTSE4Good to support the 2002 Tap excludes Water Awards. Emma Thompson and Steve Nestlé Coogan recorded special video interviews while in The FTSE4Good ethical Edinburgh which are available indices were launched this on our website. Steve Coogan summer, with Nestlé and had been asked to present the other violators of the Perrier Awards, but when International Code and asked for his comment during Resolutions being excluded what was described as a from the relevant lists (Nestlé ‘shambolic’ live Channel 4 TV is in the ‘starting universe’ of Most national and local papers carried prominent headlines reporting the boycott broadcast, he urged people to international lists and has been excluded from these). The Perrier Comedy Awards, Steve Coogan, Zoe “Boycott Nestlé.” Ssection 8 of the selection the UK’s most sought after Wannamaker and Julie Nestlé bought Perrier in criteria for social issues and award for up and coming Christie. Mark Thomas wrote a 1992, and has since become stakeholder relations states comedians, unexpectedly feature article in the New the world’s leading producer "Companies must not have caught public attention for a Statesman. of bottled water. A major part breached the infant formula very different reason at this As a corporate-free of its strategy is promotion of manufacturing section of the year’s Edinburgh Fringe alternative to the Perrier, the the bottled water brand, Pure International Code on Festival. Edinburgh-based, Out of the Life, in the developing world. Marketing of Breastmilk Comedian Rob Newman Blue Trust set up the Tap Concerns about the Substitutes according to the started what became a media Water Awards at the Bongo undermining of natural water International Baby Food circus surrounding a boycott of Club, which attracted over supplies by bottled water Action Network [IBFAN]." the awards when people 100 entrants who were companies have been raised FTSE4Good is an index realised that Perrier was a boycotting the Perrier.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Approved Products.Xlsx
    APPROVED PRODUCTS 2021 WARNING There is no kashrut supervision of the 'Kosher for Passover' section in supermarkets and errors do sometimes occur. When purchasing products for Pesach from any non-supervised establishment, you are advised to check that all items bear a reliable kosher l'Pesach hechsher and do not contain kitniyot. KEY D Dairy (non-supervised milk) and suitable for Passover P Parev and suitable for Passover NP Not suitable for Passover KLBD-P KLBD certified for Passover S-CY Supervised Chalav Yisrael by other Authority S-P Supervised for Passover by other Authority BABY MILKS Kosher l’Pesach baby formula is sold in kosher stores. In cases where this cannot be used, the following are approved. Separate utensils should be used as most baby milks, including kosher l’Pesach baby formula, contain kitniyot. Since feeding bottles normally come into contact with chametz, it is recommended to purchase new ones for Passover. Alpro Soya P Growing Up Contains Kitniyot Aptamil Listing refers to powder and ready to feed versions in bottles and cartons. D Anti Reflux D Comfort D First Infant 1 D Follow On 2 D Growing Up 3 D Growing Up 4 D Hungry D Lactose Free D Pepti 1 D Pepti 2 D Pepti Junior D Preterm Hospital Use Only D Profutura First Infant 1 D Profutura Follow On 2 D Profutura Growing Up 3 D Sensavia First Infant 1 D Sensavia Follow On 2 D Sensavia Growing Up 3 Cow & Gate Listing refers to powder and ready to feed versions in bottles and cartons. D Anti Reflux D Comfort D First Infant 1 D Follow On 2 D Growing Up 3 D Growing Up 4 D Hungry Infant D Nutriprem 1 Hospital Use Only D Nutriprem 2 D Nutriprem Human Milk Fortifier D Nutriprem Hydrolysed D Nutriprem Protein Supplement Enfamil D AR D O Lac Hipp Organic Listing refers to powder and ready to feed versions in bottles and cartons.
    [Show full text]
  • Banquet Menus Breakfast Buffet
    CULINARY BANQUET MENUS BREAKFAST BUFFET Minimum of 15 people A surcharge of $10 per person will apply for parties with 15 guests or less. ALL CONTINENTAL BREAKFASTS INCLUDE: FRESH SQUEEZED FLORIDA ORANGE JUICE, STARBUCKS ® COFFEE AND TAZO ® TEAS JUPITER CONTINENTAL $26 Assorted Seasonal Whole Fruit, Assorted Mini Danish and Mini Muffins, Yogurt Bar with Assorted Toppings, New York Style Plain Bagels Whipped Cream Cheese and Individual Butter, Cold Cereals and Milk HEALTHY START $28 Sliced Seasonal Fruits and Berries, Gluten Free Muffins Toaster Station, Wheat, Rye, and White Bread, Individual Butter, Assorted Jams and Jelly Steel-Cut Oatmeal, Honey Jars, Golden Raisins, Acai and Yogurt Parfait, Granola, Diced Fruit Farm Fresh Hard Boiled Eggs THE FLORIDIAN $33 Sliced Seasonal Fresh Fruit and Berries, Assorted Mini Danish and Mini Muffins Toaster Station, Wheat, Rye, and White Bread, Individual Butter, Assorted Jams and Jelly Fresh Cracked Scrambled Eggs, Crispy Applewood-Smoked Bacon Country Style Sausage Links, Breakfast Potatoes with Caramelized Peppers and Onions THE KEY WEST $35 Cubed Seasonal Fruit Bar, Yogurt Parfaits with Fruit Caviar, Mixed Berries Fresh Baked Plain and Chocolate Croissants Fresh Cracked Scrambled Eggs Crispy Applewood-Smoked Bacon, Country Style Sausage Links Thick Cut Brioche French Toast with Candied Pecans, Orange Zest, and Vermont Maple Syrup Breakfast Potatoes with Caramelized Peppers and Onions Prices are based on 60 minutes of service. An additional $4 per person will be charged for each additional 30 minutes
    [Show full text]
  • What's Really in Your Bottled Water?
    What’s Really in Your Bottled Water? Consumer Reports found toxic PFAS chemicals in several popular water brands, especially carbonated ones By Ryan Felton September 24, 2020 3.1K SHARES CR recently tested 47 bottled waters, including 35 noncarbonated and 12 carbonated ones. For each product, we tested two to four samples. The tests focused on four heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury), plus 30 PFAS chemicals, which pose special concerns because they can linger in the environment almost indefinitely. The federal government has issued only voluntary guidance for PFAS, saying the combined amounts for two specific PFAS compounds should be below 70 parts per trillion. A few states have set lower limits, of 12 to 20 ppt, according to American Water Works, an industry group. The International Bottled Water Association, another group, says that it supports federal limits for PFAS and that bottled water should have PFAS levels below 5 ppt for any single compound and 10 ppt for more than one. Some experts say the cutoff for total PFAS levels should be even lower, 1 ppt. Noncarbonated Water Most of the noncarbonated products CR tested had detectable levels of PFAS, but only two—Tourmaline Spring and Deer Park—exceeded 1 part per trillion. Tourmaline Spring says the amount of PFAS in its bottled water is below the levels set by the IBWA and all states. Nestlé, which makes Deer Park, says that its most recent testing for the brand indicated undetectable levels of PFAS. All noncarbonated water that CR tested had heavy metal levels well below federal safety limits, with one exception: Starkey Spring Water owned by Whole Foods.
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership Advantages and the Eclectic Paradigm
    This is a repository copy of Using history to help refine international business theory: ownership advantages and the eclectic paradigm.. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/11235/ Monograph: da Silva Lopes, T. orcid.org/0000-0002-6944-414X (2010) Using history to help refine international business theory: ownership advantages and the eclectic paradigm. Working Paper. Department of Management Studies, University of York Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ promoting access to White Rose research papers Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 11235 Working Paper da Silva Lopes, (2010) Using history to help refine international business theory: ownership advantages and the eclectic paradigm Working paper number 54 White Rose Research Online [email protected] University of York The York Management School Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Fact Sheet
    Fiduciary Management, Inc. Quarterly Review – June 30, 2021 100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2200 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 414.226.4545 FMI All Cap Equity www.fmimgt.com Performance Quarter YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years Since Inception All Cap (Gross) 5.58% 13.65% 40.85% 13.26% 13.88% 12.77% 10.92% Russell 3000 Index 8.24% 15.11% 44.16% 18.73% 17.89% 14.70% 10.70% Russell 3000 Value Index 5.16% 17.67% 45.40% 12.23% 11.99% 11.54% 7.92% Inception: December 31, 2007 Performance is preliminary and subject to reconciliation. Top 10 – Portfolio Holdings: Investment Philosophy: Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Cl B 4.4% Purchase durable business franchises that are selling at a Masco Corp. 3.4% discount to their intrinsic value. FirstCash, Inc. 3.3% Investment Process: Comcast Corp. Cl A 3.2% We utilize a business owner’s approach to investing, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. Cl A 3.1% thoroughly investigating the economics of the business and the quality of the management team. Some of the Genpact Limited 3.1% characteristics of good businesses include strong recurring Dollar General Corp. 3.1% revenue and attractive returns‐on‐invested capital (ROIC). Arrow Electronics, Inc. 3.0% We have a strong orientation to low absolute and relative Charles Schwab Corp. 3.0% valuation, which are key to the execution of our investment Robert Half International Inc. 2.8% strategy. A new idea will come from a variety of sources including company visits, screens, conferences, trade Portfolio Characteristics: (1) periodicals and general reading.
    [Show full text]
  • On Coasean Bargaining with Transaction Costs: the Case of Vittel1
    Working On Coasean Bargaining with Paper Transaction Costs: The Case of Vittel Christophe Déprés Gilles Grolleau 2005/3 Naoufel Mzoughi INRA-ENESAD UMR CESAER Centre d'Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l'Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux BP 87999 – 26, Bd Dr Petitjean – 21079 DIJON cedex On Coasean Bargaining with Transaction Costs: The Case of Vittel1 Christophe Déprés Université de Bourgogne - UMR INRA-ENESAD (CESAER) - MECF Cemagref Gilles Grolleau UMR INRA-ENESAD (CESAER) Naoufel Mzoughi (Corresponding author)2 Université de Bourgogne – UMR INRA-ENESAD (CESAER) Abstract: Based on an authentic case of contracting for environmental property rights, our paper shows several implications of applying the Coase propositions. The case study adds empirical content to basic transaction costs concepts by analyzing the design and implementation of a contractual arrangement between a pollutee –a bottler of mineral water Vittel– and several polluting farmers. We analyse the bargaining between land and water rights owners and the bottler Vittel to determine how they succeeded in contracting for environmental property rights. Valuation disputes, bi-lateral monopoly conditions, and third-party effects are key factors. Several implications for environmental rights negotiations are drawn. Key-Words: Transaction Costs, Environmental Property Rights, Vittel, Case Study, Contracting, Private arrangement, Environmental-related transactions. JEL classification: H23; K32; Q15; Q25. 1 The authors are particularly grateful to Gary Libecap for many helpful comments and suggestions. They also thank Marc Barbier, Eduardo Chia, Pierre Morlon, Freddy Huet and Katharine Farrell for their useful comments. Finally they thank the French Agency for the Environment and Energy Management (ADEME), the Regional Council of Burgundy (CRB), the Cemagref Clermont-Ferrand and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for financial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Bottled Water Recalls, Field Corrections, Violations [As of July 24, 2006]
    Information Supplement to “Bottled and Sold: The Story Behind Our Obsession with Bottled Water” (published by Island Press, April 2010) Bottled Water Recalls, Field Corrections, Violations [As of July 24, 2006] History of Contamination Recalls and “Field Corrections.” Recall Date Product Manufacturer Class of Reason1 Volume Locations Notice Recall Recalled Date 2/28/90 February 1990 Sparkling Perrier Group, II Contaminated with 0.5 million Nationwide and water Paris, France benzene cases remain on U.S. territories market as of recall date 4/25/90 January 1990 Spring Pocono II Kerosene/petroleum- 1,960 cases (6 New Jersey, New water Artesian like odor gallons per York Waters case) Company 4/25/90 February 1990 Spring Triton Water III Contaminated with Unknown North Carolina, water Company, mold Pennsylvania, Burlington, Virginia, West North Carolina Virginia 7/18/90 April 1990 Spring West Lynn II Fish smell or 125 cases (12 Vermont water Creamery, taste/burning bottles per 1 As described by the U.S. FDA Recall Notice. Lynn, sensation due to case) Massachusetts sodium hydroxide contamination 12/19/90 October 1990 Bottled Southern III Contaminated with 20,000 gallon Georgia, South drinking Beverage mold bottles and 817 Carolina, North water Packers, cases of 16 Carolina Augusta, ounce Georgia containers were distributed 2/27/91 December 1990 Drinking Hinckley & II contaminated with unknown Illinois, water, Schmitt, Inc., styrene Wisconsin Distilled Chicago, water, Illinois Nursery water 3/20/91 December 1990 Distilled Newton II with a chemical odor 2,540 cases (6 Wisconsin, drinking Valley, Ltd., and taste gallons/case) Illinois. water; Manitowoc, Artesian Wisconsin water 7/10/91 April 1990 Bottled Famous II Contaminated with Approximately Hawaii, drinking Ramona Water algae and 13,621 cases California Water Company, Pseudomonas Ramona, Aeruginosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Sparkling Water in the US 2020 Edition
    Sparkling Water in the U.S. 2020 Edition (Published March 2020. Data through 2019. Market projections through 2024.) More than 50 pages, with extensive text analysis, graphs, charts and tables ill the swiftly growing market for sparkling (imported and W domestic) and carbonated water (seltzer and club soda) be For A Full sustained into the future? Catalog of Beverage Marketing Corporation considers the possibilities in its Reports and industry report entitled: Sparkling Water in the U.S. The question Databases, is an important one as this report considers a beverage type that a decade ago was considered respectable but not as setting the Go To world on fire in terms of growth prospects. But shifting bmcreports.com demographics and consumer drivers have changed all that. Now that sparkling and carbonated water has become a reliable double-digit grower, it is important to consider what can be INSIDE: learned here for entrepreneurs and market veterans alike. Part of BMC's Focus Report series, this report offers a concise but complete executive briefing on this hot topic. REPORT OVERVIEW A brief discussion of key features of this report. 2 AVAILABLE FORMAT & PRICING TABLE OF CONTENTS A detailed outline of this Direct report’s contents and data Download tables. 6 $1,495 SAMPLE TEXT AND To learn more, to place an advance order or to inquire about INFOGRAPHICS additional user licenses call: Charlene Harvey +1 212.688.7640 A few examples of this ext. 1962 [email protected] report’s text, data content layout and style. 8 HAVE Contact Charlene Harvey: 212-688-7640 x 1962 QUESTIONS? [email protected] Beverage Marketing Corporation 850 Third Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10022 Tel: 212-688-7640 Fax: 212-826-1255 This brief but insightful market report measures volume and wholesale dollar sales, covers top brands and discusses key issues in the sparkling and carbonated water category.
    [Show full text]
  • All Bottled Up
    ALL BOTTLED UP Nestlé’s Pursuit of Community Water About Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch is a nonprofit consumer organization that works to ensure clean water and safe food. We challenge the corporate control and abuse of our food and water resources by empowering people to take action and by transforming the public consciousness about what we eat and drink. Food & Water Watch works with grassroots organizations around the world to create an economically and environmentally viable future. Through research, public and policymaker educa- tion, media and lobbying, we advocate policies that guarantee safe, wholesome food produced in a humane and sustainable manner, and public, rather than private, control of water resources including oceans, rivers and groundwater. Food & Water Watch Main office: California Office: 1616 P St. NW, Suite 300 25 Stillman Street, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 San Francisco, CA 94107 tel: (202) 683-2500 tel: (415) 293-9900 fax: (202) 683-2501 fax: (415) 293-9908 [email protected] [email protected] www.foodandwaterwatch.org Copyright © January 2009 by Food & Water Watch. All rights reserved. This report can be viewed or downloaded at www.foodandwaterwatch.org. ALL BOTTLED UP Nestlé’s Pursuit of Community Water Table of Contents iv Executive Summary, Key Findings and Key Facts About Nestlé’s Bottled Water Business 1 History 2 Case Studies 2 California water in Nestlé’s sights 5 Florida fights back 5 Efforts in New England 6 Massachusetts 7 New Hampshire 7 Maine 11 Working against Nestlé in Wisconsin 12 Michigan water at stake 13 Other communities resist Nestlé 14 Conclusion 14 What you can do 15 Nestlé’s Buying Spree 16 Appendix 1: Nestlé Lashes Out Against Documentary Film FLOW 17 Appendix 2: The Bad News with Bottled Water 18 Appendix 3: Businesses Turn to Tap Water, Too 18 Appendix 4: Some Facts: Nestlé’s Bottled Water Business 19 Appendix 5: Possible Global Trade Implications of Groundwater Extraction 20 Endnotes Executive Summary Nestlé* takes water from U.S.
    [Show full text]