Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Letting Schedule from 07/01/2001 to 12/31/2001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Letting Schedule from 07/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 Date: 06/29/2001 3:21 PM Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Page 1 of 52 Letting Schedule From 07/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 MPMS # Earliest Anticipated Length T.R. S.R. Sec. Project Description Let Date* Cost Range District 12-0 County: Westmoreland --- Bridge Replacement 31586 PA981 981 SALTSBURG CONRAIL BR 07/03/2001 500,000-1,000,000 SALTSBURG CONRAIL BR District 1-0 County: Mercer --- Additional Lanes 1634 PA018 18 A01 PA 18 NORTH HERMITAGE RD. 07/12/2001 10,000,000-20,000,000 1.90 SHENANGO MALL TO LANE SECTION OF ROUTE 18 CITY OF HERMITAGE ADD LANES, WIDEN District 2-0 County: Centre --- New Alignment 2750 220 E10 US 220 ENVIR MITIG 07/12/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 0 US 220 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION TAYLOR, WORTH, HUSTON, SNDYER, PORT MATILDA WETLAND REPLACEMENT District 4-0 County: Lackawanna --- Highway Restoration 51349 Local CNTY RD(BLAKELY 2 KENNEDY 07/12/2001 200,000-500,000 0 ARCHBALD BOROUGH MILL AND RESURFACE EXISTING COUNTY ROADWAY WITH SUPERPAVE WEARING COURSE AND LEVELING COURSE, BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE, ID-2, MANUAL PATCHING, EPOXY RESIN AND INLAID MARKINGS. District 4-0 County: Luzerne --- General Maintenance 62475 Local GROUP 4-01-SM1 07/12/2001 Less than 100,000 0 LUZERNE COUNTY, VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON VARIOUS STATE ROUTES SIGN MAINTENANCE GROUP 4-01-SM1 POST MOUNTED TRAFFIC SIGN INSTALLATION District 4-0 County: Luzerne --- General Maintenance 62812 Local GROUP 4-01-MB2 07/12/2001 100,000-200,000 0 LUZERNE COUNTY WIDE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ACCIDENT DAMAGED MEDIAN BARRIER, IMPACT ATTENUATORS AND GLARE SCREEN SYSTEMS District 4-0 County: Luzerne --- Highway Restoration 62688 I 081 81 311 LUZ. CNTY. INTERSTATE PM 07/12/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 16.13 LUZERNE COUNTY, INTERSTATE PM MILLING AND RESURFACING, UPGRADE GUIDE RAIL, SINGLE FACE BARRIER, TRAFFIC ZONE PAINT AND RECESSED PAVE. MARKERS * Actual let date may differ as a result of unforeseen issues. This document will be revised monthly. Date: 06/29/2001 3:21 PM Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Page 2 of 52 Letting Schedule From 07/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 MPMS # Earliest Anticipated Length T.R. S.R. Sec. Project Description Let Date* Cost Range District 4-0 County: Luzerne --- Safety Improvement 57003 Local LUZERNE CO. GUIDE RAIL 01 07/12/2001 500,000-1,000,000 0 LUZERNE COUNTY INTERSTATE ROUTE 81 GUIDE RAIL REPLACEMENT District 4-0 County: Luzerne --- Safety Improvement 62943 PA029 29 0 CURVE WARNING GP 4-01-PM1 07/12/2001 Less than 100,000 2.29 DISTRICT WIDE , GROUP 4-01-PM1 CURVE WARNING CONTRACT, INSTALL 24" WHITE EPOXY TRAFFIC ZONE PAINT, AND WHITE EPOXY TRAFFIC ZONE PAINT LEGENDS, "LEFT ARROW", "RIGHT ARROW" AND "SLOW" District 4-0 County: Pike --- Transportation Enhancement 57887 Local MILFORD STREETSCAPE 07/12/2001 200,000-500,000 0 VARIOUS LOCATIONS MILFORD BOROUGH STREETSCAPE District 5-0 County: Berks --- General Maintenance 62817 PA568 568 POC SURFACE IMPROVEMENT 1H 07/12/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 19.06 SR'S 10, 23, 82, I-176, 568, 724, 1004, 2009, 2017, 2018, 2021, 2054, 3001 AND 3023 SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS District 6-0 County: Delaware --- Highway Restoration 15486 US202 202 M10 202:BALT-STREET 07/12/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 0.64 WILMINGTON PK.:US 1-BALT.PK-DILWORTH RD BIRMINGHAM TOWNSHIP RESTORATION District 8-0 County: Dauphin --- General Maintenance 61627 PA147 147 008 Peters Mountain Road 07/12/2001 200,000-500,000 1.20 From the intersection of 225 & 147 to Halifax Borough line District 8-0 County: Dauphin --- Transportation Enhancement 62176 Local ENH WESTERN PA CONSERVANCY 07/12/2001 Less than 100,000 0 ENHANCEMENTS, WEST END OF STATE ST BRIDGE CITY OF HARRISBURG INSTALL GATEWAY PLANTINGS District 8-0 County: Lebanon --- Highway Restoration 61514 US322 322 016 HORSESHOE PIKE 07/12/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 4.18 PA-72 TO LANCASTER COUNTY LINE CORNWALL, SOUTH LEBANON, WEST CORNWALL TOWNSHIPS RESURFACE, BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND SHOULDERS * Actual let date may differ as a result of unforeseen issues. This document will be revised monthly. Date: 06/29/2001 3:21 PM Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Page 3 of 52 Letting Schedule From 07/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 MPMS # Earliest Anticipated Length T.R. S.R. Sec. Project Description Let Date* Cost Range District 9-0 County: Bedford --- Additional Lanes 21345 US030 30 07B BEDFORD-EVERTT WIDEN EAST 07/12/2001 20,000,000-30,000,000 3.63 US 30 FROM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL TO MT DALLAS SNAKESPRING TOWNSHIP WIDENING AND REALIGNMENT District 9-0 County: Blair --- General Maintenance 62053 4017 MC6 JUNIATA GAP RD RESURFACE 07/12/2001 500,000-1,000,000 6.31 INTERSECTION OF SR 4015 TO COUNTY LINE LOGAN TOWNSHIP RESURFACE District 9-0 County: Fulton --- New Alignment 22867 0 BPA BUSINESS PARK ACCESS 07/12/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 0.95 BETWEEN SR 1001 AND US 522 AYR TOWNSHIP NEW ACCESS ROAD District 10-0 County: Butler --- Bridge Replacement 24570 4012 250 BOYERS BRIDGE 07/12/2001 200,000-500,000 0.53 SR 4012 OVER SLIPPERY ROCK CREEK * Project to be let by locals * VILLAGE OF BOYERS IN MARION TOWNSHIP BRIDGE REPLACEMENT District 11-0 County: Allegheny --- Safety Improvement 62257 Local DISTRWIDE RPM 2001 07/12/2001 500,000-1,000,000 0 VARIOUS LOCATIONS VARIOUS MUNICIPALITIES RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS District 11-0 County: Beaver --- Safety Improvement 47884 PA068 68 B19 RT 68 SIGNALS 07/12/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 4.07 BEAVER BOROUGH SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT District 12-0 County: Fayette --- Highway Restoration 47476 4003 01R SR 4003 RETAIN. WALL 07/12/2001 200,000-500,000 0.20 N. OF SHEPLER ROAD TO S. OF T-325 (3RD ST.) LUZERNE TOWNSHIP RESTORATION District 12-0 County: Westmoreland --- Transportation Enhancement 57504 Local GW1 GROUP 12-01-GW1 07/12/2001 Less than 100,000 0 DEVELOP GATEWAY GARDENS THROUGHOUT PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT * Actual let date may differ as a result of unforeseen issues. This document will be revised monthly. Date: 06/29/2001 3:21 PM Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Page 4 of 52 Letting Schedule From 07/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 MPMS # Earliest Anticipated Length T.R. S.R. Sec. Project Description Let Date* Cost Range District 12-0 County: Westmoreland --- Transportation Enhancement 57505 Local GW2 GROUP 12-01-GW2 07/12/2001 Less than 100,000 0 DEVELOP GATEWAY GARDENS THROUGHOUT PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT District 6-0 County: Philadelphia --- Highway Restoration 17582 Local 9900 LOC SCHOOL HOUSE LANE 07/15/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 0.70 RIDGE PARK TO HENRY AVE * Project to be let by locals * CITY OF PHILADELPHIA RECONSTRUCTION District 6-0 County: Philadelphia --- Highway Restoration 17734 Local 9900 5TH 4TH & 5TH HWY DIST3R 07/15/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 3.00 5TH & 6TH HWY * Project to be let by locals * CITY OF PHILADELPHIA RESTORATION District 6-0 County: Philadelphia --- Safety Improvement 62930 Local I95/I676 TURNDN END TERMS 07/15/2001 500,000-1,000,000 0 VARIOUS LOCATIONS * Project to be let by locals * PHILADELPHIA COUNTY GUIDERAIL IMPROVEMENTS District 9-0 County: Somerset --- Bicycle/Pedestrian 50158 0 MYR MEYERSDALE TRAIL (ATA) 07/15/2001 200,000-500,000 1.60 FROM THE SALISBURY VIADUCT TO THE MEYERSDALE TRAIN * Project to be let by locals * STATION MEYERSDALE BOROUGH AND SUMMIT TOWNSHIP CONSTRUCT BICYCLE/PEDESTIAN TRAIL District 10-0 County: Clarion --- Bridge Replacement 25070 Local 9900 BR T-620 WALLEY RUN BRIDGE 07/15/2001 200,000-500,000 0.10 OVER WALLEY RUN * Project to be let by locals * FARMINGTON TOWNSHIP BRIDGE REPLACEMENT District 2-0 County: Centre --- Highway Restoration 46935 PA350 350 116 SR 350 NEAR PHILIPSBURG 07/26/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 1.51 SR 350 BETWEEN T-592 TO PRESQUILE ST RUSH TOWNSHIP RESTORATION District 2-0 County: Centre --- Transportation Enhancement 50615 Local ENH BLUE/WHITE PED BIKE TRAIL 07/26/2001 500,000-1,000,000 0 BLUE AND WHITE PEDESTRIAN/BIKE TRAIL STATE COLLEGE BORO. & FERGUSON TWP. PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE FACILTIES * Actual let date may differ as a result of unforeseen issues. This document will be revised monthly. Date: 06/29/2001 3:21 PM Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Page 5 of 52 Letting Schedule From 07/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 MPMS # Earliest Anticipated Length T.R. S.R. Sec. Project Description Let Date* Cost Range District 2-0 County: Potter --- Highway Restoration 62456 PA872 872 613 SR 872 JENKINS HILL 07/26/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 2.56 NEAR SR3003 INT. & COUNTY HOME DRIVE EULALIA TOWNSHIP & COUDERSPORT BORO RESTORATION, DRAINAGE& GUIDE RAIL IMPROV. District 3-0 County: Bradford --- Bridge Restoration 5105 Local 9900 BRG KNAPPS COVERED BR 07/26/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 0.02 OVER BROWNS CREEK BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP BRIDGE REHABILITATION District 3-0 County: Bradford --- General Maintenance 61708 Local BRADFORD 2000 CRACK SEAL 07/26/2001 100,000-200,000 0 VARIOUS SR'S COUNTYWIDE CRACK SEALING District 3-0 County: Bradford --- New Alignment 5236 6006 001 CENT.BRAD.TRAFF.IMPV 07/26/2001 1,000,000-5,000,000 1.10 RIVER STREET FROM SOUTH OF SR 6 TO NORTH OF STATE STREET TOWANDA BOROUGH RECONSTRUCTION District 3-0 County: Columbia --- Bridge Replacement 5450 1023 005 E BR. BRIAR CREEK BRIDGE 07/26/2001 500,000-1,000,000 0.01 OVER E BRANCH BRIAR CREEK BERWICK BOROUGH BRIDGE REPLACEMENT District 3-0 County: Lycoming --- Bridge Restoration 5930 PA405 405 064 A 405/SUSQUEHANNA R 07/26/2001 5,000,000-10,000,000 0 OVER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER CLINTON & MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIPS BRIDGE REHABILITATION District 3-0 County: Lycoming --- New Alignment 48672 Local 9900 TRENTON AV.CONNECTOR 07/26/2001 500,000-1,000,000 ACCESS IMPROVEMENT TO WILLIAMSPORT INDUSTRIAL PK CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT NEW 2 LANE ROADWAY District 3-0 County: Lycoming --- Safety Improvement 62535 Local FFY 2001 RPM 07/26/2001 200,000-500,000 0 VARIOUS STATE ROUTES VARIOUS MUNICIPALITIES REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS * Actual let date may differ as a result of unforeseen issues.
Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE FORT PITT BLOCK HOUSE Prepared by Kelly Linn - January 2008
    THE FORT PITT BLOCK HOUSE Prepared by Kelly Linn - January 2008 The Block House is just one small defensive redoubt and the only surviving structure of Fort Pitt - a key British fortification during the French and Indian War in North America (or the Seven Years War as it is known in Europe). Constructed as the second largest British fort on the colonial frontier, Fort Pitt measured about 18 acres. Crown Point in New York was the largest covering 3.5 square miles. Both of these installations date to the same military era. Fort Pitt was constructed at the Forks of the Ohio (now the Point at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) between 1759 and 1761. It was a classic star-shaped fort with 5 bastions projecting from the corners. The Music Bastion and the Grenadiers Bastion were on the east, or land side, of the Point, the Flag and Monongahela Bastions fronted the Monongahela River and the Ohio Bastion overlooked the Allegheny River floodplain. Only the eastern walls were faced with brick to repel cannon fire; the remaining walls of the fort were earthen ramparts covered with sod. The walls of the fort averaged a height of 15 feet above the Monongahela terrace upon which it was constructed. In January 1762 - only a few months after the fort was completed - flood waters from the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers crested at nearly 40 feet inflicting heavy damage to the fort. Repairs were made, but in March 1763, another flood cresting at 41 feet, destroyed the Ohio Bastion entirely and heavily damaged the Monongahela Bastion a second time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Passage Through Time & the Mountains
    The GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE is the longest multi-purpose rail-trail in the East, A Passage Through Time with t 00 continuous miles of trail open from near McKeesport to near Meyersdale, plus and the several smaller segments open in the Pittsburgh area. When finished, the Passage Mountains will offer a total of t 50 miles of non­ motorized, nearly level trail system between Cumberland, MD and the forks of the Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA. with a 52-mile spur to the Pittsburgh International Airport. At. Cumberland, it joins the C&..O Canal Towpath to expand the off-road trail linkage to Washington, D.C. Designated a National Recreation Trail, the Great Allegheny Passage enables hikers, bicyclists, cross­ country skiers and people with disabilities to discover the region's singular beauty in river gorges, mountain vistas and sweeping cityscapes. The Great Allegheny Passage is the registered mark of the Allegheny Trail Alliance, a coalition of seven trail organizations in Sovthwestem Pennsylvania and Western Maryland. www.atatrall.org 888-ATA-BIKE COVER: On May 2 t , t 975, the Chessie System ran this special train over the soon­ to-be-abandoned Western Maryland corridor from Connellsville to Hancock, MD to show the line to government and conservation officials and the press. This was the last passenger train to cross Salisbury Viaduct. The Viaduct was decked for trail use in 1999. The color photo was taken in May, 2002. Photos by Bill Metzger 50300 The Story of the GREAT ALLEGHENY 9 780964 601499 PASSAGE 2 HE GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE is no mere tootpath through the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Presidential Speeches
    Post-Presidential Speeches • Fort Pitt Chapter, Association of the United States Army, May 31, 1961 General Hay, Members of the Fort Pitt Chapter, Association of the United States Army: On June 6, 1944, the United States undertook, on the beaches of Normandy, one of its greatest military adventures on its long history. Twenty-seven years before, another American Army had landed in France with the historic declaration, “Lafayette, we are here.” But on D-Day, unlike the situation in 1917, the armed forces of the United States came not to reinforce an existing Western front, but to establish one. D-Day was a team effort. No service, no single Allied nation could have done the job alone. But it was in the nature of things that the Army should establish the beachhead, from which the over-running of the enemy in Europe would begin. Success, and all that it meant to the rights of free people, depended on the men who advanced across the ground, and by their later advances, rolled back the might of Nazi tyranny. That Army of Liberation was made up of Americans and Britons and Frenchmen, of Hollanders, Belgians, Poles, Norwegians, Danes and Luxembourgers. The American Army, in turn, was composed of Regulars, National Guardsmen, Reservists and Selectees, all of them reflecting the vast panorama of American life. This Army was sustained in the field by the unparalleled industrial genius and might of a free economy, organized by men such as yourselves, joined together voluntarily for the common defense. Beyond the victory achieved by this combined effort lies the equally dramatic fact of achieving Western security by cooperative effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Streamflow Statistics for Streamgage Locations in and Near Pennsylvania
    Prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Selected Streamflow Statistics for Streamgage Locations in and near Pennsylvania Open-File Report 2011–1070 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Tunkhannock Creek and Highway 6 overpass downstream from U.S. Geological Survey streamgage 01534000 Tunkhannock Creek near Tunkhannock, PA. (Photo by Andrew Reif, USGS) Selected Streamflow Statistics for Streamgage Locations in and near Pennsylvania By Marla H. Stuckey and Mark A. Roland Prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Open-File Report 2011–1070 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Stuckey, M.H., and Roland, M.A., 2011, Selected streamflow statistics for streamgage locations in and near Pennsyl- vania: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania
    Pennsylvania ROUTE The Great American Rail-Trail route through Pennsylvania connects New York—from the shores of Lake Erie to the confluence of the several existing trails with one trail gap just west of Pittsburgh. Three Rivers in Pittsburgh and on to the Ohio River and Appalachian By connecting the trail through Pittsburgh, the Great American foothills. Rail-Trail also connects to the Industrial Heartland Trails Coalition (IHTC), a vision for a 1,500-mile network of trails that is part of RTC found and reviewed 22 plans in Pennsylvania to better RTC’s TrailNation™ portfolio. The IHTC network will stretch across understand the commonwealth’s trail priorities. A full list of these 51 counties in four states—Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and plans can be found in Appendix A. TABLE 6 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL STATISTICS IN PENNSYLVANIA Total Great American Rail-Trail Existing Trail Miles in Pa. (% of Total State Mileage) 161.3 (93.8%) Total Great American Rail-Trail Trail Gap Miles in Pa. (% of Total State Mileage) 10.6 (6.2%) Total Trail Gaps in Pa. 1 Total Great American Rail-Trail Miles in Pa. 171.9 TABLE 7 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE THROUGH PENNSYLVANIA Existing Trail or Trail Gap Name Length in Pa. Along Great American Rail-Trail (in Miles) Great Allegheny Passage 124.3 Three Rivers Heritage Trail 3.6 TRAIL GAP 1 – Pittsburgh to Coraopolis 10.6 Montour Trail 17.5 Panhandle Trail 15.9 Total Miles 171.9 Existing Trail Miles 161.3 Trail Gap Miles 10.6 railstotrails.org 23 24 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE ASSESSMENT MAP 3: PENNSYLVANIA greatamericanrailtrail.org GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE ASSESSMENT PENNSYLVANIA Great Allegheny Passage (gaptrail.org) in Pennsylvania GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE The GAP enters Pennsylvania just north of Frostburg, Maryland, and it will continue to host the Great American Rail-Trail through Total Length (in Miles) 150.0 Pennsylvania for 124.3 miles through rolling hills and forestland Total Length Along Great to Pittsburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT October 31, 2020 FORT PITT CAPITAL TOTAL
    ANNUAL REPORT October 31 , 2020 FORT PITT CAPITAL TOTAL RETURN FUND c/o U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC P.O. Box 701 Milwaukee, WI 53201-0701 1-866-688-8775 Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports from the Fund (defined herein) or from your financial intermediary, such as a broker-dealer or bank. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Fund or your financial intermediary electronically through the Fund’s website. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. You can inform the Fund or your financial intermediary that you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held within the fund complex and may apply to all funds held through your financial intermediary. Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund Dear Fellow Shareholders, As of October 31, 2020, the net asset value (“NAV”) of the Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (the “Fund”) was $25.06 per share.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford Countywide Action Plan
    BEDFORD COUNTYWIDE ACTION PLAN Protecting the future of Bedford County’s natural resources October 8, 2020 BEDFORD COUNTYWIDE ACTION PLAN Working together to protect the future of Bedford County’s natural resources. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Plan Purpose Plan Highlights Key Findings Opportunities for Success Challenges to Implementation II. INITIATIVES Summary Programmatic/Policy Recommendations Priority Initiatives Detail Preservation of Natural Areas Agriculture Riparian Buffers Point Source Pollution Stormwater Education & Outreach III. REPORTING AND SUPPORT DOCUMENTS Proposed BMPs for Implementation Initiatives Tracking Document(s) (PADEP Planning Template) Programmatic Recommendations Document (PADEP Programmatic Template) Bedford County Snapshot IV. APPENDIX Bedford CAP Organizational Chart Projects and Initiatives Highlights Catchment Management Database 2 BEDFORD COUNTYWIDE ACTION PLAN Working together to protect the future of Bedford County’s natural resources. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Plan Purpose The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) developed the third phase of their Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plan (Ph. III WIP) in 2018. The plan requires implementation of local water quality improvements by 2025 to meet statewide pollution reduction goals. PADEP’s Ph. III WIP is based on a collaborative and bottom-up clean water planning approach between the state and each county in the Chesapeake Bay drainage area. This approach gives each county flexibility to create a plan that meets local needs and is unique to the jurisdiction. Plan Highlights The Bedford Countywide Action Plan (Bedford CAP) is a summary of approaches, initiatives, and considerations for existing and proposed water quality improvements in the county. The initiatives are intended to protect the future of Bedford County’s natural resources while preserving other community goals and focus areas.
    [Show full text]
  • By Edward A. Galloway, M.L.I.S
    By Edward A. Galloway, M.L.I.S. Boy Scout shirt, tie, and sash. HHC Museum Collection, 2001.107.1, .3, .5, donated by Dennis A. & Barbara K. Ross. Guyasuta’s grave was noted in the 1876 Hopkins atlas of Allegheny County. HHC L&A, 1988 reprint. 18 WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | WINTER 2011-12 For nearly a century, Camp Guyasuta has been “an ideal place for Boy Scouts to live out their Handbook, to dream and be inspired and become good Americans.”1 Situated on roughly 130 acres in a deep valley between Aspinwall and Sharpsburg, Guyasuta is the primary camp for the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) in the newly formed Laurel Highlands Council. But before Guyasuta was established in 1918, the land was home to multiple generations of a prominent Pittsburgh family. It also served as the burial ground for a famous Native American. It has hosted lively parties, protected wildlife as a sanctuary, and was the center of a contentious battle between the mighty Pennsylvania Railroad and a “silver-haired old woman.”2 WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | WINTER 2011-12 19 Darlington estate Guyasuta including the home with circular drive as depicted on a Hopkins map, 1897. Archives Service Center, University of Pittsburgh. he land’s history can be traced back hunted there and even built a lodge. The area several hundred years to when would later become O’Hara Township. Western Pennsylvania was home to As a government agent, O’Hara traded the Iroquois, also known as the Indian Tribes with the Native Americans at Fort Pitt, and of the Six Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh, Pa), Photographs, 1892- 1981 (Bulk 1946-1965)
    Allegheny Conference On Community Development Page 1 Allegheny Conference On Community Development (Pittsburgh, Pa), Photographs, 1892- 1981 (bulk 1946-1965) Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania Archives MSP# 285 30 boxes (Boxes 1-22 Prints, Boxes 23-28 Negatives, Box 28 Transparencies, Boxes 29-30 Oversized Prints) Table of Content: Historical Note page 1 Scope and Content Note page 2 Series I: Prints page 2 Sub-series: Aviation page 3 Sub-series: Buildings page 3 Sub-series: Culture page 3 Sub-series: Education page 3 Sub-series: Golden Triangle page 4 Sub-series: Health & Welfare page 4 Sub-series: Highways page 4 Sub-series: Historical page 4 Sub-series: Housing page 4 Sub-series: Miscellaneous page 5 Sub-series: PA Pitt Partner’s Program page 5 Sub-series: Personnel page 5 Sub-series: Publications page 5 Sub-series: Recreation page 6 Sub-series: Research page 6 Sub-series: Smoke Control page 6 Sub-series: Stadiums page 6 Sub-series: Transportation page 6 Sub-series: Urban Redevelopment page 7 Series II: Negatives page 7 Sub-Series: Glass Plate Negatives page 7 Series III: Transparencies page 7 Series IV: Oversized Prints & Negatives page 7 Provenance page 8 Restrictions and Separations page 8 Catalog Entries page 8 Container List page 10 Series I: Prints page 10 Sub-series: Aviation page 10 Sub-series: Buildings page 10 Sub-series: Culture page 14 Allegheny Conference On Community Development Page 2 Sub-series: Education page 16 Sub-series: Golden Triangle page 20 Sub-series: Health & Welfare page 22 Sub-series: Highways page
    [Show full text]