The Trial of O.J. Simpson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Trial of O.J. Simpson Moments in Time by Frank C. Clifford THE CRIMINAL TRIAL OF O. J. SIMPSON: JANUARY 24, 1995; 10:34:29 A.M. PST; LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA A gruesome double murder on Bundy Drive. A mesmer- (the 11th-house emphasis, his Sun trine Jupiter, and Mars ising slow-speed highway pursuit of a Ford Bronco on live trine Neptune from the 10th to the 2nd house). (See Chart 1.) TV. The “insurmountable evidence” demolished by the best It suggests his fame as a running back in American football as defence team that money could buy. The People v. O. J. well as his infamous association with two “knife-slashing” kill- Simpson was hailed as “the trial of the century”: The idol- ings (Mars in Gemini in the 10th). His chart also reflects the ised former football star and occasional actor had been the (now) overriding public opinion that he got away with murder most famous person in America ever to be arrested for mur- and that, in private, he was a possessive, physically threaten- der. Simpson was on trial for killing his ex-wife Nicole Brown ing, and emotionally controlling spouse (Jupiter in Scorpio on and her friend Ron Goldman. Forensic evidence (hair, blood, the IC square Saturn–Pluto). Given that Simpson’s Saturn– DNA, clothing fibres, hand prints, a sock, and a glove) con- Pluto in Leo in the 12th is square his MC–IC axis, his lawyer nected him to the crime scene — yet he was famously acquit- Johnnie Cochran skillfully portrayed Simpson as a victim of ted. Simpson’s nine-month trial divided America along racial institutionalised racism and police corruption. In Simpson’s lines and has since been the subject of dozens of documenta- natal chart, asteroid Cochran is conjunct (within a degree) his ries plus a recent TV series. Saturn, and by 1995 it had moved to conjoin Saturn in the The courtroom circus featured a diverse cast of charac- trial chart.1 Opposing attorneys Marcia Clark and Robert Sha- ters, from the single-mom attorney (Marcia Clark) leading the piro are in there, too: Asteroids Marcia and Shapiro oppose prosecution, to the freeloading houseguest (Kato Kaelin), the Simpson’s Sun in Cancer. racist cop (Mark Fuhrman), the star-struck judge (Lance Ito), It’s estimated that the murders took place around 10:10 O.and J. Simpson the various inept crime scene analysts. The trial irrevoca- Trialp.m. Simpson on June 12, 1994 in Brentwood, Los Angeles, some Natal Chart Natal Chart Jul bly9 1947, changed Wed the lives of everyone involved. Janweeks 24 1995, Tueafter a solar eclipse on Simpson’s Midheaven (MC). In 8:08 am PST +8:00 10:34:29 am PST +8:00 San Francisco,O. J.CA Simpson’s natal chart reveals his charisma and mar- Losthe Angeles, murder CA chart, Uranus and Neptune straddle the Capricorn 37°N46'30'' 122°W25'06'' 34°N03'08'' 118°W14'34'' Geocentricketability, as well as his silver-tongued legal “Dream Team” GeocentricAscendant (and oppose Simpson’s Mercury and his murdered Tropical Tropical Placidus Placidus True Node True Node 18° Ý 47' 12° ‰ 52' 25' 15° 14' 20° ‚ É Ü Š ˆ 23° ¼ 57' 07° ¿À 24' 01° ¸ ¿ 06° 26°23° ‚ 04° ‰ » » 23° ‚ ‰ 17° 27' º Š 27' 01° ‚ 01' 52' ˆ ½ 52' Œ 17° 33' 21° 18' 09° 25° ¸ ƒ 25' ¶ 48' 21' Š ˆ Á ƒ 16° 10 9 25° ‹ ‹ 06' 10 9 ‡ º ƒ ‹ 09' 00° 25° 24° 35' 51' 08° ˆ 21' ƒ 35' ¾ 10' 39' 11 8 10° 11 8 Œ ‹ ¶ 16' ‡11° ¾ 39' 10° É 09°„ ‡ 00' S48' Á 12°„ 10' 12 7 12 7 24° Chart 1: 24° 21° Chart 2: 21° „ Š Ü † 36' O. J. Simpson 36' 15' The Simpson 15' 1 6 1 6 S Trial Begins Œ Ý 48' 14' … Ê 10° 26°  2 5 2 5 Œ 30' 17° 52' 25° „ 33' 3 4 3 4 … 07' ‰ Ý 29° … † 51' Œ Œ 25° 21' ¼ 08° 08° 21' 45' 27' À ‡ ‡ ˆ 02° 17° 01° 15° 25' 20° 14' †  ½ Ê ˆ ‚ „ Placidus houses, 57' 23° 24' 07° True Node 18° ‡ 47' 12° ƒ 52' 16 THE MOUNTAIN ASTROLOGER STUDENT SECTION ex-wife’s Mars). The murders created a media frenzy and re- parties. Transiting Jupiter and Uranus were conjunct in the flected the status/celebrity–obsessed tabloid (later Internet) era sky and conjoining the original trial’s Sun at 4° Aquarius. that this conjunction in Capricorn heralded. The trial chart (along with Simpson’s) has been activated But let’s look at the chart for the start of the trial (data many times since. Simpson attempted to profit from a book courtesy of Marjorie Rosen, who watched it live on the air). called If I Did It, a tasteless “fictional” account of the murder (See Chart 2.) The prosecutors (initiators) are symbolised by (seen by many as a confessional). Its publication was cancelled the Ascendant, the defence by the Descendant. Aries rises, on November 20, 2006, as transiting (TR) Saturn reached and chart ruler Mars is at the final degree of Leo (tightly square his Ascendant at 24° Leo and TR Mars was at 18° Scorpio to Pluto, which had just moved into Sagittarius). In attempt- on his IC. Despite the book’s being leaked on June 13, 2007 ing to pursue the celebrity (Mars in Leo at the final degree (with Neptune conjunct the trial’s Mercury at 21° Aquarius), conjunct Regulus), the prosecutors are fighting a losing bat- the Goldman family seized the legal rights to it, and the book tle: Malefic Mars is retrograde, the unfortunate South Node is was published on September 13, 2007. Synchronistically, this in their house (the 1st), and Mercury would turn retrograde on was the day O. J. staged an armed robbery in Las Vegas to the second day of the trial. Simpson and the defence are ruled reclaim some valuable memorabilia that he felt still belonged by benefic Venus in lucky Sagittarius near the 9th-house cusp. to him — Jupiter was at 11° Sagittarius, a full cycle from the Approval-seeking Judge Ito (represented by 10th-house ruler start of the 1995 trial. Saturn in Pisces) presided over the case and appeared to be The robbery trial began on September 8, 2008 with TR dazzled by the fallen hero in his courtroom and the celebrities Jupiter at 12° Capricorn (on the original trial’s MC) and trine who visited (asteroid Itoh is at 20° Libra conjunct the Descen- TR Saturn at 12° Virgo in the sky (they do say that karma’s a dant — on the side of the defence). When the “not guilty” ver- bitch). Simpson was found guilty under another Mercury ret- dict was read on October 3, 1995, Venus was at 21° Libra. rograde on October 3, 2008, the thirteenth anniversary of his Mercury was retrograde in Cancer at the time of the mur- original acquittal. He later lost a request for a new trial on No- der (Simpson was also born with a retrograde Mercury in vember 27, 2013 as TR Saturn reached 16° Scorpio (near his Cancer), reflecting the contamination of evidence and the al- Jupiter–IC). The recent TV dramatisation of the murder trial leged tampering that took place at the murder scene (Nicole (American Crime Story: The People v. O. J. Simpson) began Brown’s property). But that retrograde would also appear at on February 2, 2016, with Venus at 12° Capricorn, while the key times during the trial, which began as Mercury was sta- Uranus–Pluto square activated Simpson’s natal Sun in Cancer. tionary, ready to turn retrograde. The next time Mercury went retrograde (in Gemini: hands), Simpson tried on the gloves All data listed can be found at http://www.astrodatabank.com and proclaimed they were “too tight.” The final time was in Note Libra during the prosecution’s and defence’s closing state- 1. Cochran played the “race card,” and there was much tension and fear that ments (and the verdict), with Cochran famously saying, “If you a verdict of guilty would instigate further LA riots like those following the legal cannot trust the messenger, you cannot trust the message” debacle surrounding Rodney King, who — remarkably — has Saturn at 11° (Mercury) and “If it [the glove] doesn’t fit, you must acquit.” Pisces conjunct the Simpson trial’s Saturn. Acquitted Simpson was, but on February 5, 1997, he was found liable in a civil suit for the “wrongful death” of both © 2016 Frank C. Clifford – all rights reserved SEE AUTHOR BIO ON PAGE 23 AUG. / SEPT. 2016 17.
Recommended publications
  • Impartiality: a Comparison of Legal Processes in the United States and Italy
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Undergraduate Honors Theses 2020-04-01 IMPARTIALITY: A COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITALY Robert Borden Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Borden, Robert, "IMPARTIALITY: A COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITALY" (2020). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 116. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht/116 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Honors Thesis IMPARTIALITY: A COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITALY by Robert Borden Submitted to Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of graduation requirements for University Honors Italian Department Brigham Young University April 2020 Advisors: Dr. Marie Orton, Dr. Dan Paul, and Dr. Justin Collings Honors Coordinator: Dr. Marie Orton ii ABSTRACT IMPARTIALITY: A COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITALY Robert L. Borden Italian Department Bachelor of Arts This thesis examines the constitutional guarantees of impartiality granted in both the United States and Italian constitutions. Aided by the presentation of these two constitutional legal systems, this paper will attempt to break apart the elements of each system and point out key differences. By pointing out the differences in these systems including variations in their founding documents, the structure of the courts, the role of the judges, the role of the advocates, and the role of other key players, this paper will show that while individual cases in both countries are exposed to multiple biases throughout the legal process, in the end justice is given impartially.
    [Show full text]
  • Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy a Civil Judgment? Hastings H
    Journal of Intellectual Property Law Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 4 October 2007 Squeezing "The uiceJ ": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy A Civil Judgment? Hastings H. Beard University of Georgia School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Hastings H. Beard, Squeezing "The Juice": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy A Civil Judgment?, 15 J. Intell. Prop. L. 143 (2007). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/vol15/iss1/4 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beard: Squeezing "The Juice": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Sati NOTES SQUEEZING "THEJUICE": CAN THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY BE USED TO SATISFY A CIVIL JUDGMENT? TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 144 II. BACKGROUND ............................................ 147 A. THE ORIGIN OF THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY .................... 148 B. THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AS A PROPERTY RIGHT ............... 151 1. Significance of the ProperyLabel in Legal Contexts .............. 151 2. Assignabiliy of the Right of Publiciy ........................ 154 C. TREATMENT OF OTHER FORMS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: COMPETING INTERESTS .................................. 157 D. PRINCIPLES OF TORT LAW ................................. 159 1. Function of the Law of Torts ............................... 159 2. Poliy Considerations .................................... 160 III. D ISCUSSION ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Things the Ethical Lawyer Can Learn from the OJ Trial Richard Jolley and Brian Augenthaler
    4/12/2017 10 Things the Ethical Lawyer Can Learn From the OJ Trial Richard Jolley and Brian Augenthaler OJ murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman • Murders: June 12, 1994 • Brentwood, L.A. • Arrested: June 17, 1994 • Arraignment: June 20, 1994 • Verdict: October 3, 1995 1 4/12/2017 5 “killer” pieces of physical evidence • Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson’s blood in OJ’s Bronco • OJ’s blood at the Bundy crime scene • Bloody glove at Bundy and the bloody glove at OJ’s house • Bloody footprints at scene matching bloody footprint in OJ’s Bronco • Trace evidence – hair and fiber evidence linking OJ to crime scene and Goldman Goldman’s blood in the Bronco • The Bronco was locked and was not accessed until the tow yard • LAPD detectives asked Kato if he had spare keys the morning after the murders • Mark Furhman was never in the Bronco (mistake spare tire testimony) 2 4/12/2017 OJ’s blood at Bundy • OJ’s blood drops next to bloody Bruno Magli size-12 shoe print (1 in 170 million) • OJ’s blood on back gate (1 in 58 billion!) • Phil Vanatter planted it on the gate? Bloody gloves • Aris XL cashmere-lined gloves (less than 200 pair sold exclusively by Bloomingdales) (unavailable west of Chicago) • Receipt for identical gloves purchased by Nicole Brown Simpson in December 1990 (and photos of OJ wearing those gloves) • Left glove found at Bundy crime scene and right glove found by Mark Fuhrman • Blood and hair of victims and Simpson found on gloves • How did Mark Fuhrman get lucky and plant a glove that OJ wore? How did Fuhrman get OJ’s blood unless
    [Show full text]
  • Turning the Camera on Court TV: Does Televising Trials Teach Us Anything About the Real Law?
    Turning the Camera on Court TV: Does Televising Trials Teach Us Anything About the Real Law? ANGELIQUE M. PAUL* I. INTRODUCTION What people think about the law is important because ours is a "public opinion" society, "which makes heavy use of referenda, and in which government does not lift a finger or move a muscle without reading the tea leaves of public desire."' The public's perception of justice influences the courts, the laws, the judges, and essentially the democratic process. So what influences the public's perception of justice? Television. For the majority of Americans, television is the most important source of information, and for many it is the only source of information. 2 This is particularly true when it comes to gathering information about the law. Because the majority of Americans have had no personal experience with the legal system,3 and because the majority of Americans get their information about the world solely from television, 4 the portrayal of justice on television is extremely important not only to the continued viability of the legal system, but also to the individual's understanding of that system. Studies indicate that the * The author would like to thank her parents, David and Lynda Paul, for their unconditional love and support. I David A. Harris, The Appearance of Justice: Court TV, Conventional Television, and Public Undersandingof the Criminal Justice Sstem, 35 ARiz. L. REv. 785, 796 (1993) (quoting Lawrence Friedman, Law, Lawyers, and Popular Culture, 98 YALE L. J. 1579, 1597 (1989)). Friedman believes that the portrayal of the legal system in popular culture is important "because it ultimately helps shape the legal culture, which in turn influences the law itself." Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts Are Stubborn Things": Protecting Due Process from Virulent Publicity
    Touro Law Review Volume 33 Number 2 Article 8 2017 "Facts Are Stubborn Things": Protecting Due Process from Virulent Publicity Benjamin Brafman Darren Stakey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Civil Procedure Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Brafman, Benjamin and Stakey, Darren (2017) ""Facts Are Stubborn Things": Protecting Due Process from Virulent Publicity," Touro Law Review: Vol. 33 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brafman and Stakey: Facts Are Stubborn Things “FACTS ARE STUBBORN THINGS”: PROTECTING DUE PROCESS FROM VIRULENT PUBLICITY by Benjamin Brafman, Esq.* and Darren Stakey, Esq.** *Benjamin Brafman is the principal of a seven-lawyer firm Brafman & Associates, P.C. located in Manhattan. Mr. Brafman’s firm specializes in criminal law with an emphasis on White Collar criminal defense. Mr. Brafman received his law degree from Ohio Northern University, in 1974, graduating with Distinction and serving as Manuscript Editor of The Law Review. He went on to earn a Masters of Law Degree (LL.M.) in Criminal Justice from New York University Law School. In May of 2014, Mr. Brafman was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from Ohio Northern University Law School. Mr. Brafman, a former Assistant District Attorney in the Rackets Bureau of the New York County District Attorney’s Office, has been in private practice since 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Cataloging Still in Progress
    OJ SIMPSON MURDER TRIAL O.J. Simpson "Bronco Chase" audio CD (full transcript can be seen here) OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Collection (each disc is roughly 4 hours) Two hundred 4 hr. DVD's, professionally edited (100% commercial free) - contains virtually every minute of testimony. Recorded from local L.A. television stations, live as the events unfolded. Coverage begins with reports of the murders, till weeks after the verdict - and beyond. "O.J. Simpson - The Whole Story (and then some)" legend: "break" = fade to black, edited commercial break "H/C" = Hard Copy "ET" = Entertainment Tonight * To purchase, or inquire about OJ SImpson Murder Trial DVD duplications, click here * * To download a .pdf file of this OJ SImpson Murder Trial DVD listing, click here (322 KB) * OJ TRIAL #001 DVD (3:53:00) * News reports of the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman (ABC News, FX) * OJ waiting in truck outside of his house (@ 0:01:10) * Taped earlier: end of freeway chase, to Parker Center, news reports (@ 0:50:00) * Gil Garcetti, Commander Gascon: recap of charges (@ 1:36:48) * OJ's mug shot released on 11 o'clock news (@ 2:23:00), recap of days events * Johnnie Cochran, Al Michaels on "NightLine" (@ 2:51:00) * KNBC Morning News recap of events (@ 2:58:00) * Criminal Courts Bldg. Pre-Trial Preliminary Hearing, KNBC - Judge Kathleen Kennedy-Powell (@ 3:02:00) * Michele Kestler - LAPD Crime Lab (@ 3:18:00), cross-examination (@ 3:49:00), recess (@ 3:52:00) * KNBC news-break. OJ TRIAL #002 DVD (3:58:45) * Live evidence search KNBC news * Michele Kestler cross-examination cont.
    [Show full text]
  • OJ Episode 1, FINAL, 6-3-15.Fdx Script
    EPISODE 1: “FROM THE ASHES OF TRAGEDY” Written by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski Based on “THE RUN OF HIS LIFE” By Jeffrey Toobin Directed by Ryan Murphy Fox 21 FX Productions Color Force FINAL 6-3-15 Ryan Murphy Television ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. COPYRIGHT © 2015 TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION. NO PORTION OF THIS SCRIPT MAY BE PERFORMED, PUBLISHED, REPRODUCED, SOLD, OR DISTRIBUTED BY ANY MEANS OR QUOTED OR PUBLISHED IN ANY MEDIUM, INCLUDING ANY WEB SITE, WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION. DISPOSAL OF THIS SCRIPT COPY DOES NOT ALTER ANY OF THE RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ABOVE. 1 ARCHIVE FOOTAGE - THE RODNEY KING BEATING. Grainy, late-night 1 video. An AFRICAN-AMERICAN MAN lies on the ground. A handful of white LAPD COPS stand around, watching, while two of them ruthlessly BEAT and ATTACK him. ARCHIVE FOOTAGE - THE L.A. RIOTS. The volatile eruption of a city. Furious AFRICAN-AMERICANS tear Los Angeles apart. Trash cans get hurled through windows. Buildings burn. Cars get overturned. People run through the streets. Faces are angry, frustrated, screaming. The NOISE and FURY and IMAGES build, until -- SILENCE. Then, a single CARD: "TWO YEARS LATER" CUT TO: 2 EXT. ROCKINGHAM HOUSE - LATE NIGHT 2 ANGLE on a BRONZE STATUE of OJ SIMPSON, heroic in football regalia. Larger than life, inspiring. It watches over OJ'S estate, an impressive Tudor mansion on a huge corner lot. It's June 12, 1994. Out front, a young LIMO DRIVER waits. He nervously checks his watch. Then, OJ SIMPSON comes rushing from the house.
    [Show full text]
  • The Daily Egyptian, October 04, 1995
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC October 1995 Daily Egyptian 1995 10-4-1995 The Daily Egyptian, October 04, 1995 Daily Egyptian Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/de_October1995 Volume 81, Issue 32 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Daily Egyptian 1995 at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in October 1995 by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inside: Logging in the Cripps Bend area in Shawnee National Forest is complete - page 3 - Daily Egyptian we?Z?Jday Southern Illinois Uni\'ersity at Carbondale Vol. 81, No. 32, 16 pages After nine months, Simpson not guilty LOS ANGELES (CNN) stood and faceµ lhc jury a.~ 51-ycar-old local government after 9:30 p.m .• found the hou!>C in Gus Bode a court clerk read two "not guilty" employee. darkness. apparently with no one at For more vcnlicts shortly after IO a.m. PDT. Tcstimonv in the trial look almost home. Orenth;il information I le moul/1cd the wonl~ "thank you" nine month~~. encompassing ahout Simpson, a college football star James Simpson on the O.J. after each verdict was read. 120 witnesses. 45,000 pages of evi­ and Heisman ,\ward winner, was is a free man. · verdict !',!cmhcrs of Simpson's fan1ily cried dence and 1,100 exhibits. But the later clech:d to the pm-football Hall lie was acquit• sre1iage-l tears of joy in the counroom a.~ the jury of IO women and tw<J men, of Fame and parlayed his skill a.s an 1cd Tuesday in family of murder victim Ron comprising nine blacks, two white.~ athlete into a successful c:irccr a.s a the brutal stab- Goldman wept just a few feet away.
    [Show full text]
  • Oj Simpson Kato Kaelin Testimony
    Oj Simpson Kato Kaelin Testimony whichWindburned Hermann Merrick is barefaced sometimes enough? electrolyze Darrell his classicizes ebony granularly her brangles and trokes clandestinely, so incessantly! inalienable Crosiered and implacable. and ornamented Taddeus oppress: At oj simpson, and above the bird amid criticism some personal belongings when oj simpson kato kaelin states the time would she did jada cheat on the argument. Soundbite q you? Did kaelin has kato kaelin is it was oj simpson and mr show? The entrance to african americans huddled around to assist in this whole escapade on and records showed simpson, in the wall? Berry gordy in los angeles were going on the testimony, then removed the air conditioner in hindsight i mean where was oj simpson kato kaelin testimony today, when you or did it parked. That kaelin appeared to keep mounting up there is kato was wrong black bag again see anything else there are movies and whether you? Always had style was open when those occasions, oj simpson kato kaelin testimony during a white female in the front door but simpson had consented to? And kato committed murder case here from that oj simpson kato kaelin testimony showing the testimony, kaelin points that would have people felt like i am i got out as the prosecution and download all? And on a foot still are victims just now no testimony that oj simpson kato kaelin testimony, right around a bloody gloves to have been time? He explained how you wear such evidence, oj to oj simpson kato kaelin testimony? The presence of oj simpson kato kaelin testimony at ucla school, the main house in the trunk himself as blood.
    [Show full text]
  • E Media, the Jury, and the High-Profile Defendant: a Defense
    VOLUME 55 | 2010/11 JOHN C. MERINGOLO !e Media, the Jury, and the High-Pro"le Defendant: A Defense Perspective on the Media Circus ABOUT THE AUTHOR: John Meringolo received his J.D. from New York Law School in 1999 and is currently a criminal defense attorney in New York City. Early in his career, Mr. Meringolo gained experience while working under the esteemed James LaRossa, beginning with the trial of United States v. DeMartino, No. 03 CR 285 (RJD) (E.D.N.Y. May 7, 2004). Such experience provided Mr. Meringolo instant exposure to high-profile criminal defense. Over the last seven years of Mr. Meringolo’s private practice, he has tried numerous high-profile cases, including: United States v. DePalma, No. 05 CR 225 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. June 6, 2006), United States v. Boyle, No. 03 CR 970 (SJ) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2005), Indictment, People v. Lucente, No. 490-09 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2010), and, as discussed later in this article, United States v. Gotti, No. 08 CR 1220 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2009). Aside from practicing law, Mr. Meringolo also teaches Trial Advocacy as an Adjunct Professor at New York Law School. 981 THE MEDIA, THE JURY, AND THE HIGH-PROFILE DEFENDANT I. INTRODUCTION Throughout American history, there has been tension between the Sixth Amendment right of a criminal defendant to receive a fair trial and the First Amendment right for freedom of the press to publish news about criminal trials. Over the last seventy-five years in particular, media coverage of trials has steadily increased as a result of rapid advancements in technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appearance of Justice: Juries, Judges and the Media Transcript
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 86 Article 11 Issue 3 Spring Spring 1996 The Appearance of Justice: Juries, Judges and the Media Transcript Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation The Appearance of Justice: Juries, Judges and the Media Transcript, 86 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1096 (1995-1996) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/96/8603-1096 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 86, No. 3 Copyright © 1996 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE: JURIES, JUDGES AND THE MEDIA TRANSCRIPT* FEATURED SPEAKERS: LESLIE ABRAMSON AND Two MENENDEZ JURORS MS. BIENEN: Leslie Abramson is a graduate of U.C.L.A. Law School. Her specific experience has been in the area of criminal de- fense. While a public defender, she was assigned to central felony tri- als, and handled over 600 felony cases and over forty felony jury trials, which included charges of murder, rape, murder, robbery, kidnaping, arson, burglary, and other crimes. She has extensive jury and trial ex- perience, mainly in felony cases, and was chief counsel in fourteen death penalty cases. MS. ABRAMSON: It's impossible for someone who has practiced criminal defense for twenty-five years come to a conference like this and not have 10,000 things to say, actually I think the people who are here, that you will hear from today, who are much more interesting than myself are Hazel Thorton and Betty Burke.
    [Show full text]
  • Racializing Asian Americans in a Society Obsessed with OJ
    Hastings Women’s Law Journal Volume 6 Article 4 Number 2 Seeing the Elephant 6-1-1995 Beyond Black and White: Racializing Asian Americans in a Society Obsessed with O.J. Cynthia Kwei Yung Lee Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hwlj Recommended Citation Cynthia Kwei Yung Lee, Beyond Black and White: Racializing Asian Americans in a Society Obsessed with O.J., 6 Hastings Women's L.J. 165 (1995). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hwlj/vol6/iss2/4 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Women’s Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beyond Black and White: Racializing Asian Americans in a Society Obsessed with 0.1. Cynthia Kwei Yung Lee* I. Introduction The 0.1. Simpson double murder trial has been called the "Trial of the 2 Century" I and has captured the attention of millions. The trial has raised interesting questions about the convergence of issues regarding race, class, and gender. 3 Rather than extensively discussing these global issues, * The author is an Associate Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. She received an A.B. from Stanford University and a J.D. from the University of California at Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law. First and foremost, she wishes to thank her good friend Robert Chang who, through his own scholarship, encouraged her to write this essay.
    [Show full text]