DOCSLIB.ORG

A Syndicated Loan Primer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Syndicated Loan Primer A Syndicated Loan Primer Managing Director S&P Capital IQ Steven C. Miller New York (1) 212-438-2715 [email protected] Follow us on Twitter LeveragedLoan.com September 2014 Contents Loan Purposes ....................................................................................... 4 Types of Syndications .............................................................................. 5 The Syndication Process ........................................................................... 5 Public Versus Private .............................................................................. 7 Credit Risk: An Overview .......................................................................... 8 Syndicating a Loan by Facility ................................................................... 10 Pricing a Loan in the Primary Market .......................................................... 10 Types of Syndicated Loan Facilities ............................................................ 11 Lender Titles ....................................................................................... 14 Secondary Sales .................................................................................... 14 Participations ...................................................................................... 15 Loan Derivatives ................................................................................... 15 Pricing Terms ...................................................................................... 16 Loan Math—The Art of Spread Calculation .................................................... 20 Default and Restructuring ....................................................................... 21 Bits and Pieces ..................................................................................... 22 2 (3) whether the loan is underwritten. Merger and A Syndicated Loan acquisition (M&A) and recapitalization loans will likely carry high fees, as will exit financings and Primer restructuring deals. Seasoned leveraged issuers, by contrast, pay lower fees for refinancings and add-on transactions. Because investment-grade loans are infrequently drawn down and, therefore, offer drastically lower yields, the ancillary business is as A syndicated loan is a commercial loan important a factor as the credit product in arranging provided by a group of lenders and such deals, especially because many acquisition-related financings for investment-grade structured, arranged, and administered by companies are large in relation to the pool of potential one or several commercial or investment investors, which would consist solely of banks. banks known as arrangers. The “retail” market for a syndicated loan consists of Starting with the large leveraged buyout banks and, in the case of leveraged transactions, fi- (LBO) loans of the mid-1980s, the nance companies and institutional investors such as mutual funds, structured finance vehicles, and hedge syndicated loan market has become the funds. Before formally launching a loan to these retail dominant way for issuers to tap banks and accounts, arrangers will often read the market by in- other institutional capital providers for loans. formally polling select investors to gauge their appe- The reason is simple: Syndicated loans are tite for the credit. Based on these discussions, the less expensive and more efficient to arranger will launch the credit at a spread and fee it administer than traditional bilateral, or believes will clear the market. Until 1998, this would individual, credit lines. have been it. Once the pricing was set, it was set, except in the most extreme cases. If the loan were undersubscribed, the arrangers could very well be left Arrangers serve the time-honored investment-banking above their desired hold level. After the Russian debt role of raising investor dollars for an issuer in need of crisis roiled the market in 1998, however, arrangers capital. The issuer pays the arranger a fee for this adopted market-flex language, which allows them to service, and, naturally, this fee increases with the change the pricing of the loan based on investor de- complexity and riskiness of the loan. As a result, the mand—in some cases within a predetermined most profitable loans are those to leveraged borrow- range—as well as shift amounts between various ers—issuers whose credit ratings are speculative grade tranches of a loan, as a standard feature of loan com- and who are paying spreads (premiums above LIBOR mitment letters. Market-flex language, in a single or another base rate) sufficient to attract the interest of stroke, pushed the loan syndication process, at least in nonbank term loan investors, typically LIBOR+200 or the leveraged arena, across the Rubicon, to a higher, though this threshold moves up and down full-fledged capital markets exercise. depending on market conditions. Initially, arrangers invoked flex language to make loans By contrast, large, high-quality companies pay little or more attractive to investors by hiking the spread or no fee for a plain-vanilla loan, typically an unsecured lowering the price. This was logical after the volatility revolving credit instrument that is used to provide introduced by the Russian debt debacle. Over time, support for short-term commercial paper borrowings however, market-flex became a tool either to increase or or for working capital. In many cases, moreover, these decrease pricing of a loan, based on investor demand. borrowers will effectively syndicate a loan themselves, using the arranger simply to craft Because of market-flex, a loan syndication today documents and administer the process. For leveraged functions as a “book-building” exercise, in issuers, the story is a very different one for the bond-market parlance. A loan is originally launched to arranger, and, by “different,” we mean more lucrative. market at a target spread or, as was increasingly A new leveraged loan can carry an arranger fee of common by the late 2000s, with a range of spreads 1-5% of the total loan commitment, generally referred to as price talk (i.e., a target spread of, say, speaking, depending on (1) the complexity of the LIBOR+250 to LIBOR+275). Investors then will transaction, (2) the strength of market conditions, and 3 make commitments that in many cases are tiered by • Sponsor-to-sponsor (S2S) deals, where one the spread. For example, an account may put in for private equity firm sells a portfolio property $25 million at LIBOR+275 or $15 million at LI- to another. BOR+250. At the end of the process, the arranger will total up the commitments and then make a call on • Noncore acquisitions, in which a corporate where to price, or “print,” the paper. Following the issuer sells a division to a private equity firm. example above, if the paper is oversubscribed at LI- BOR+250, the arranger may slice the spread further. 2) Platform acquisitions. Transactions in which Conversely, if it is undersubscribed even at LI- private-equity-backed issuers buy a business that they BOR+275, then the arranger may be forced to raise the judge will be accretive by either creating cost savings spread to bring more money to the table. and/or generating expansion synergies. 3) Strategic acquisitions. These are similar to plat- Loan Purposes form acquisitions but are executed by an issuer that is not owned by a private equity firm. For the most part, issuers use leveraged loan proceeds for four purposes: (1) supporting a merger- or acqui- Recapitalizations sition-related transaction; (2) backing a recapitaliza- tion of a company’s balance sheet; (3) refinancing A leveraged loan backing a recapitalization results in debt; and (4) funding general corporate purposes or changes in the composition of an entity’s balance project finance. sheet mix between debt and equity either by (1) issu- ing debt to pay a dividend or repurchase stock, or (2) Mergers and acquisitions selling new equity, in some cases to repay debt. M&A is the lifeblood of leveraged finance. There are Some common examples: the three primary types of acquisition loans: Dividend. Dividend financing is straightforward. A 1) Leveraged buyouts (LBOs). Most LBOs are company takes on debt and uses proceeds to pay a backed by a private equity firm, which funds the dividend to shareholders. Activity here tends to track transaction with a significant amount of debt in the market conditions. form of leveraged loans, mezzanine finance, high-yield bonds, and/or seller notes. Debt as a share Bull markets inspire more dividend deals as issuers tap of total sources of funding for the LBO can range from excess liquidity to pay out equity holders. In weaker 50% to upwards of 75%. The nature of the transaction markets activity slows as lenders tighten the reins, and will determine how highly it is leveraged. usually look skeptically at transactions that weaken an issuer’s balance sheet. Issuers with large, stable cash flows usually are able to support higher leverage. Similarly, issuers in Stock repurchase. In this form of recap deal a com- defensive, less-cyclical sectors are given more latitude pany uses debt proceeds to repurchase stock. The than those in cyclical industry segments. Finally, the effect on the balance sheet is the same as a dividend, reputation of the private equity backer (sponsor) also with the mix shifting toward debt. plays a role, as does market liquidity (the amount of institutional investor cash available). Stronger markets Equity infusion. These transactions typically are seen usually allow for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dealing with Secured Lenders1
    CHAPTER TWO Dealing with Secured Lenders1 David Hillman2 Mark Shinderman3 Aaron Wernick4 With investors continuing to pursue higher yields, the market for secured debt has experienced a resurgence since the depth of the fi nancial crisis of 2008. For borrowers, the lenders’ willingness to make these loans has translated to increased liquidity and access to capital for numerous purposes, including (i) providing working capital and funding for general corporate purposes; (ii) funding an acquisition-related transaction or a recapitalization of a company’s balance sheet; or (iii) refi nancing a borrower’s existing debt. The increased debt loads may lead to fi nancial distress when a borrower’s business sags, at which point management will typically turn to its secured lenders to begin negotiations on the restructuring of the business’s debt. Consequently, the secured lenders usually take the most active role in monitoring the credit and responding to problems when they fi rst arise. Secured loans come in many different forms and are offered from a range of different investors. The common feature for secured debt is the existence of a lien on all or a portion of the borrower’s assets. Following is a brief overview of the common types of secured lending: Asset-Based Loans. The traditional loan market consisted of an asset based lender (traditionally a bank or commercial fi nancing institution) providing revolving loans, term loans, and letters of credit secured by a fi rst priority lien on accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and 1. Special thanks to Douglas R. Urquhart and Roshelle Nagar of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP for their contributions to earlier editions of this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Syndicated Loan Market
    Syndicated Loan Market Loan Syndications and Trading Association Bram Smith – [email protected] (Executive Director) Elliot Ganz – [email protected] (General Counsel) LSTA member distribution 125 100 75 50 LSTA member firms 25 0 Institutional Investors Banks Law Firms Service Providers The Loan Syndications and Trading Association is the trade association for the floating rate corporate loan market. The LSTA promotes a fair, orderly, and efficient corporate loan market and provides leadership in advancing the interest of all market participants. The LSTA undertakes a wide variety of activities to foster the development of policies and market practices designed to promote just and equitable marketplace principles and to encourage cooperation and coordination with firms facilitating transactions in loans and related claims. 2 U.S. Corporate loan market is a vital source Of capital for American business U.S. Corporate loan and loan commitments outstanding U.S. Corporate loans outstanding Commits/outstandings ($Bils.) Held by non-banks According to government data, the U.S. syndicated loan market totals roughly $2.5 trillion of committed lines and outstanding loans The committed lines are loans in the form of revolvers – they can be drawn, repaid, drawn, repaid, etc. It is a key source of financing for many large and middle market companies in the U.S. Over one-third of outstanding loans are held by non-banks; half of those are held by CLOs Source: Shared National Credit Review U.S. syndicated lending volume U.S. syndicated lending volume Loan volume($Bils.) Investment grade loans are often undrawn revolvers that backstop commercial paper programs for companies like IBM; they are held almost exclusively by banks.
    [Show full text]
  • NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES VOLATILITY in INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKET ISSUANCE: the ROLE of the FINANCIAL CENTER Marco Cipriani
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES VOLATILITY IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKET ISSUANCE: THE ROLE OF THE FINANCIAL CENTER Marco Cipriani Graciela L. Kaminsky Working Paper 12587 http://www.nber.org/papers/w12587 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2006 This paper was in part written while Cipriani was visiting the European Institute in Florence and Kaminsky was a visiting scholar at the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. We thank both institutions for their hospitality. We thank the Center for the Study of Globalization at George Washington University for financial support. We also thank Pablo Vega-Garcia for excellent research assistance. The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority or the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2006 by Marco Cipriani and Graciela L. Kaminsky. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Volatility in International Financial Market Issuance: The Role of the Financial Center Marco Cipriani and Graciela L. Kaminsky NBER Working Paper No. 12587 October 2006 JEL No. F3 ABSTRACT We study the pattern of volatility of gross issuance in international capital markets since 1980. We find several short-lived episodes of high volatility. Over the long run, however, volatility has declined, suggesting that international financial integration has not made financial markets more erratic. We use VAR analysis to examine the determinants of the time-varying pattern of volatility, focusing in particular on the role of financial centers.
    [Show full text]
  • No 946 the Pricing of Carbon Risk in Syndicated Loans: Which Risks Are Priced and Why? by Torsten Ehlers, Frank Packer and Kathrin De Greiff
    BIS Working Papers No 946 The pricing of carbon risk in syndicated loans: which risks are priced and why? by Torsten Ehlers, Frank Packer and Kathrin de Greiff Monetary and Economic Department June 2021 JEL classification: G2, Q01, Q5. Keywords: environmental policy, climate policy risk, transition risk, loan pricing. BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The papers are on subjects of topical interest and are technical in character. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2021. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISSN 1020-0959 (print) ISSN 1682-7678 (online) The pricing of carbon risk in syndicated loans: which risks are priced and why?1 Torsten Ehlers, Frank Packer and Kathrin de Greiff 2 Abstract Do banks price the risks of climate policy change? Combining syndicated loan data with carbon intensity data (CO2 emissions relative to revenue) of borrowers across a wide range of industries, we find a significant “carbon premium” since the Paris Agreement. The loan risk premium related to CO2 emission intensity is apparent across industries and broader than that due simply to “stranded assets” in fossil fuel or other carbon-intensive industries. The price of risk, however, appears to be relatively low given the material risks faced by borrowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Loan Spreads and Economic Activity∗
    Corporate Loan Spreads and Economic Activity∗ Anthony Saunders Alessandro Spina Stern School of Business, New York University Copenhagen Business School Daniel Streitz Sascha Steffen Copenhagen Business School Frankfurt School of Finance & Management Danish Finance Institute May 17, 2021 Abstract We use secondary corporate loan market prices to construct a novel loan market-based credit spread. This measure has additional predictive power across macroeconomic outcomes beyond existing bond credit spreads as well as other commonly used predic- tors in both the U.S. and Europe. Consistent with theoretical predictions, our evidence highlights the joint role of financial intermediary and borrower balance sheet frictions. In particular, loan market borrowers are compositionally different from bond mar- ket borrowers, which helps explain the differential predictive power of loan over bond spreads. Exploiting industry specific loan spreads and alternative weighting schemes further improves our business cycle forecasts. JEL classification: E23, E44, G20 Keywords: Credit spreads, Secondary loan market, Bonds, Credit supply, Business cycle ∗Corresponding author: Sascha Steffen, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Adickesallee 32-34. 60322 Frankfurt, Germany. E-mail: s.steff[email protected]. We thank Klaus Adam, Ed Altman, Yakov Amihud, Giovanni Dell’Ariccia, Tobias Berg, Nina Boyarchenko, Jennifer Carpenter, Itay Goldstein, Arpit Gupta, Kose John, Toomas Laaritz, Yuearan Ma, Atif Mian, Emanuel Moench, Holger Mueller, Martin Oehmke, Cecilia Palatore, Carolin
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Trends in Second Lien Loans
    VEDDERPRICE ® Finance and Transactions Group Winter 2008–2009 Special Report “SECOND LIEN” LOANS Executive Summary. During the past few years, the financial markets have enabled borrowers to issue multiple layers of debt in sophisticated fi nancings, particularly in the case of highly leveraged companies. Thus, second lien fi nancing has not only become a recognized part of the capital structure of such fi nancings, but has experienced impressive expansion. The “market” terms that govern the second lien layer of debt evolved in light of increased involvement of nonbank investors (i.e., private equity sponsors, hedge funds, distressed debt funds, etc.). As the continued level of involvement of these nonbank investors remains uncertain and the credit markets tighten, the relationships between senior and junior secured lenders will change and certain provisions not typically found in recent intercreditor agreements may once again surface. This article discusses in detail the recent progression of second lien fi nancing structures and certain relevant intercreditor provisions (including payment subordination, enforcement actions, amendment rights and rights in bankruptcy) that may face increased scrutiny by fi rst lien and second lien lenders alike. WWW.VEDDERPRICE.COM VEDDERPRICE RECENT TRENDS IN SECOND LIEN LOANS Over the past several years, lenders have offered quarterly reviews, between 2003 and 2005, borrowers many alternative fi nancing vehicles as second lien loan volume spiked from $3.1 billion to options for fi nancing their acquisitions, corporate $16.3 billion. By 2006, LCD that reported the restructurings or operations. The creative and volume increased to $28.3 billion; in 2007, the complex fi nancing structures that resulted gave volume grew to nearly $30 billion, with more than rise to many different classes and types of lien 90% of the loans funded during the fi rst three priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on Second Lien Term Loan Financings by Neil Cummings and Kirk A
    A Primer on Second Lien Term Loan Financings By Neil Cummings and Kirk A. Davenport ne of the more noticeable developments in can protect their interests in the collateral by requiring the debt markets in the last year has been second lien lenders to agree to a “silent second” lien. Othe exponential increase in the number of Second lien lenders can often be persuaded to second lien fi nancings in the senior bank loan mar- agree to this arrangement because a silent second ket. Standard & Poor’s/Leveraged Commentary & lien is better than no lien at all. In addition, under Data Team reports that second lien fi nancings raised the intercreditor agreement, in most deals, the more than $7.8 billion in the fi rst seven months of second lien lenders expressly reserve all of the 2004 alone, compared with about $3.2 billion for all rights of an unsecured creditor, subject to some of 2003. important exceptions. In this article, we discuss second lien term loans All of this sounds very simple, and fi rst and second marketed for sale in the institutional loan market, lien investors may be tempted to ask why it takes with a goal of providing both an overview of the pages of heavily negotiated intercreditor terms to product and an understanding of some of the key document a silent second lien. The answer is that business and legal issues that are often at issue. a “silent second” lien can span a range from com- In a second lien loan transaction, the second lien pletely silent to fairly quiet, and where the volume lenders hold a second priority security interest on the control is ultimately set varies from deal to deal, assets of the borrower.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Financial Infrastructure an Ambitious Look at How Blockchain Can Reshape Financial Services
    The future of financial infrastructure An ambitious look at how blockchain can reshape financial services An Industry Project of the Financial Services Community | Prepared in collaboration with Deloitte Part of the Future of Financial Services Series • August 2016 Foreword Consistent with the World Economic Forum’s mission of applying a multistakeholder approach to address issues of global impact, creating this report involved extensive outreach and dialogue with the Financial Services Community, Innovation Community, Technology Community, academia and the public sector. The dialogue included numerous interviews and interactive sessions to discuss the insights and opportunities for collaborative action. Sincere thanks to the industry and subject matter experts who contributed unique insights to this report. In particular, the members of this Financial Services Community project’s Steering Committee and Working Group, who are introduced in the Acknowledgements section, played an invaluable role as experts and patient mentors. We are also very grateful to Deloitte Consulting LLP in the US, an entity within the Deloitte1 network, for its generous commitment and support in its capacity as the official professional services adviser to the World Economic Forum for this project. Contact For feedback or questions: R. Jesse McWaters [email protected] +1 (212) 703 6633 1 Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms.
    [Show full text]
  • CDD and AML Monitoring in Syndicated Lending
    CDD and AML monitoring in syndicated lending tltsolicitors.com/insights-and-events/insight/cdd-and-aml-monitoring-in-syndicated-lending Part two in a series of six highlighting some of the key legal issues that can arise throughout the life of a syndicated loan facility. In this article we examine how the UK's anti-money laundering regime impacts initial Know Your Customer (KYC) and ongoing Customer Due Diligence (CDD) requirements in the syndicated lending market. We will also look at the practical impact GDPR has had on the CDD process over the last year. Overview – a risk-based approach Lenders will be aware of the risk-based approach adopted in the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (the 2017 Regulations) which came into force on 26 June 2017. The difficulty or the benefit depending on your perspective, of a risk-based approach is that no one size fits all. Each firm must carry out its own risk assessment by reference to its customers, products or services, transactions, delivery channels and geographical areas of operation. When considering their policies, lenders can have regard to the (non-exhaustive) Risk Factor Guidelines issued by the European Supervisory Authorities as well as the sector specific guidance from the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG). In addition there is the FCA's Financial Crime Guide which applies to regulated firms. This guide is non- binding and utilises the same risk-based proportionality approach found in the 2017 Regulations. With the regulatory spotlight on this area, it is important to adhere to these regulatory obligations throughout the lifecycle of the customer relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Created Equal: Surveying Investments in Non-Investment Grade U.S
    Winter 2016 Not created equal: Surveying investments in non-investment grade U.S. corporate debt Institutional investors seeking yield and current income opportunities have increased their allocations to non-investment grade corporate bonds and loans over the last several years. It is not hard to make the case for investing in these assets with the 10-year Treasury hovering around 2% and with historically low rates across the yield curve. Non-investment grade U.S. corporate debt has historically produced yields in the 6-10% range or greater. And with default rates below their long-term averages, it is not surprising that investment capital has poured into non-investment grade assets, especially as worries over low interest rates continue to persist. But while delivering much-needed yield with manageable levels of risk, non-investment grade corporate debt is far from a monolithic asset class. There are several categories that investors can choose from, and they are markedly different from each other—both in terms of market dynamics and the underlying risk/return profile of the investments. Furthermore, as the credit cycle has shifted into a period of higher volatility, rising defaults and potentially rising rates, now is a good time for investors to consider the differences among the sub- asset classes of non-investment grade debt and determine which strategies best match their long-term objectives. The many flavors of leveraged lending We can illustrate the different risk/return attributes and the drivers of performance in each of the asset classes by putting the main asset classes of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Latham Watkins Second Lien Loans
    Latham Watkins Second Lien Loans tap-dancedihedronsWalt film twitteringly legato,unerringly sylphid as or abrasivelicenses and unsure. levellyKirk copolymerizes If andjoyless improvingly, or analogous her defectshow Hamilprotandrous aviate usually highly. is overtrust Neall? Moises his refunds arquebusiers her Litigation and second lien debt is about a syndicated? Taking or loans as such loan arranger is low revenues and release any. Suppliers to loans were required or liens. Credit parties hereto pursuant to loans in. New loans made its books of? Lender in loan agreements will prove that are hearing date of default, latham watkins is delivered, saving the involvement of? Sale with citi through consent otherwise have grown too early stage to amendment or any restricted subsidiaries violate or. Parent borrower to second liens explained that. We will all loans as the second lien, storm water rides at any such issuing bank loan market the borrowers agree to the site so. Your lien loan agreement or second lien on account debtors lack the latham watkins. Any loan to second amended. Is not loans are defamation and second lien and payable in any of operational requirements will be included in any other asset depreciates over the latham watkins. He has not loans sat on liens will provide such loan? In loans under a higher return those contracts on. Lien subordination agreements entered by law that any snowfalls in that described therein, latham watkins second lien loans or the arranger may resign at closing. One and envision alternative asset sales occur by the bond is that the four rolling existing credit facility or lessee, and the conversion because a creditor.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Loan Syndication and Participation Issues
    CONSTRUCTION LOAN SYNDICATION AND PARTICIPATION ISSUES American Bar Association Section of Real Property, Probate and Trust Law 13th Annual Spring CLE and Council Meeting April 24-28, 2002 Westin St. Francis Hotel San Francisco, California American Bar Association Annual Meeting August 8-13, 2002 Washington, D.C. Advanced Real Estate Law Course Texas Bar Association July 10-12, 2003 Hill Country Hyatt Regency Hotel San Antonio, Texas Construction Loan Syndication and Participation Issues Table of Contents 1. Making Borrowers and Lenders Comfortable in Construction Loan Syndications and Participations. 1.1 Shift to Syndications in the late 1990's 1.2 Basic Legal Differences 1.3 Basic Practical Differences 2. The Funding Issue 2.1 The Practical Perspective 2.2 Participations 2.3 Dealing with the Defaulting Lender in a Syndication 2.3.1 Administrative Agent Advances 2.3.2 Defaulting Lender Provisions 2.3.2.1 Quick Default Determination 2.3.2.2 Electing Lenders 2.3.2.3 Application of Payments/Indemnification 2.3.2.4 Voting and Ownership Percentage Adjustments 2.3.2.5 Removal and Replacement 2.3.2.6 Extreme Protection 3. The Day-to-Day Management Issue 3.1 The Problem with Multiple Lender Approval 3.2 Lead Lender/Administrative Agent Role/Discretion 3.3 Participant/Syndicate Lender Concerns/Approval Rights 4. The Liability and Removal Issue 4.1 Lead Lender in a Participation 4.2 Administrative Agent in a Syndication 4.3 The 50/50 Deal Problem 4.4 The Administrative Agent is not the Lender's "Deep Pocket" 4.5 Rattling the Gross Negligence/Willful Misconduct Chain 5.
    [Show full text]