APTA Q4 2018 Ridership Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

APTA Q4 2018 Ridership Report American Public Transportation Association 12-Apr-19 Contact: Matthew Dickens 1300 Eye St NW, Suite 1200 E Senior Policy Analyst Washington, DC 20005 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION RIDERSHIP REPORT Telephone: (202) 496-4817 Fourth Quarter 2018 Email: [email protected] ESTIMATED UNITED STATES UNLINKED TRANSIT PASSENGER TRIPS CALENDAR COMPARISON Percent Change OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Period 2018 2017 2017-2018 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 OCTOBER 928,220 908,706 2.15% Weekdays 22 21 2020 20 20 NOVEMBER 815,249 837,842 -2.70% Saturdays 4 4 4 4 5 5 DECEMBER 761,732 779,689 -2.30% Sundays 4 5 4 4 5 5 Fourth Quarter 2,505,202 2,526,237 -0.83% Holidays 1 1 2 2 1 1 ESTIMATED UNLINKED TRANSIT PASSENGER TRIPS * CURRENT YEAR (a)(b) PRECEDING YEAR (a)(b) % CHANGE (b) OCT '18- JAN '18- OCT '17- JAN '17- Fourth Year MODE OCT '18 NOV '18 DEC '18 DEC '18 DEC '18 OCT '17 NOV '17 DEC '17 DEC '17 DEC '17 Quarter -to-Date (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's)(000's) (000's) (000's) (000's)(000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) Heavy Rail 347,398305,024 286,222 938,644 3,714,370 339,956 316,345 299,501 955,801 3,813,559 -1.79% -2.60% Light Rail 48,46043,220 40,627 132,307 526,109 47,920 44,060 40,922 132,902 542,274 -0.45% -2.98% Commuter Rail 44,84341,465 40,041 126,349 499,096 43,840 41,424 40,258 125,522 497,073 0.66% 0.41% Trolleybus 7,4766,622 6,400 20,498 81,070 7,365 6,680 6,462 20,507 83,031 -0.05% -2.36% Bus Population Group 2,000,000+ 300,685263,267 250,037 813,990 3,219,483 294,780 270,601 251,383 816,764 3,281,578 -0.34% -1.89% 500,000 to 1,999,999 82,00372,079 67,018 221,100 868,329 80,972 74,238 67,877 223,086 887,791 -0.89% -2.19% 100,000 to 499,999 41,93735,984 28,668 106,588 407,111 40,504 36,622 30,355 107,481 411,755 -0.83% -1.13% Below 100,000 19,39315,346 11,677 46,415 176,190 19,022 15,974 12,589 47,585 177,478 -2.46% -0.73% Bus Total 444,017386,676 357,400 1,188,093 4,671,113 435,278 397,435362,203 1,194,916 4,758,603 -0.57% -1.84% Demand Response 19,58217,425 16,618 53,625 211,739 18,297 17,253 16,259 51,809 207,452 3.51% 2.07% Other (c) 16,44314,818 14,424 45,684 189,202 16,050 14,646 14,083 44,780 188,719 2.02% 0.26% United States Total 928,220815,249 761,732 2,505,202 9,892,700 908,706 837,842779,689 2,526,237 10,090,710 -0.83% -1.96% Canada 244,125239,502 209,968 693,595 2,677,802 224,738 225,359 201,548 651,645 2,521,840 6.44% 6.18% * Preliminary information based on data from reporting systems. Note: Data may differ from that included in Federal Transit Administration reports due to differences in data calculation procedures and in periods of time covered. (a) Transit agencies assigned by urbanized areas or urban places of less than 50,000 population outside urbanized areas based on 2010 U.S. Census Population. (b) Year-to-date ridership adjusted for data received after closing dates of previous issues. (c) Includes aerial tramway, automated guideway, cable car, ferryboat, inclined plane, monorail, and vanpool. American Public Transportation Association 12-Apr-19 2 1300 Eye St NW, Suite 1200 E Contact: Matthew Dickens Washington, DC 20005 Senior Policy Analyst HEAVY RAIL Telephone: (202) 496-4817 Email: [email protected] PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION RIDERSHIP REPORT Fourth Quarter 2018 ESTIMATED UNLINKED TRANSIT PASSENGER TRIPS CURRENT YEAR (a)(b) PRECEDING YEAR (a)(b) % CHANGE (b) State and AVG OCT '18- JAN '18- OCT '17- JAN '17- 4th Qtr YTD Primary City Transit Agency WKDY OCT '18 NOV '18 DEC '18 DEC '18 DEC '18 OCT '17 NOV '17 DEC '17 DEC '17 DEC '17 Chng Chng (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's)(000's) (000's) CALos Angeles Los Angeles County MTA 139.1 3,794.7 3,582.3 3,621.3 10,998.343,300.6 3,813.7 3,668.6 3,571.1 11,053.4 44,860.7 -0.50% -3.48% CASan Francisco San Francisco Bay Area RTD 416.6 11,480.0 9,597.2 9,223.6 30,300.8125,576.4 11,407.7 10,494.3 9,876.5 31,778.5 129,361.7 -4.65% -2.93% DCWashington Washington Metro Area TA 764.3 21,181.9 17,790.9 16,031.6 55,004.4226,349.6 20,248.0 17,932.2 15,908.5 54,088.7 229,595.7 1.69% -1.41% FLMiami Miami-Dade Transit Agency 67.8 1,757.2 1,656.9 1,553.8 4,967.919,282.5 1,708.6 1,609.9 1,517.3 4,835.8 19,680.4 2.73% -2.02% GAAtlanta Metro Atlanta Rapid Tr Auth 205.8 6,019.5 5,257.3 4,816.2 16,093.064,854.0 6,077.7 5,428.6 5,062.6 16,568.9 67,410.0 -2.87% -3.79% ILChicago Chicago Transit Authority 719.7 21,551.5 18,271.1 16,109.7 55,932.3225,895.1 21,075.1 18,678.5 16,389.8 56,143.4 230,204.2 -0.38% -1.87% MABoston Massachusetts Bay Tr Auth 509.6 14,625.0 12,757.3 11,399.6 38,781.9155,748.8 14,947.6 13,451.5 11,931.9 40,331.0 167,167.9 -3.84% -6.83% MDBaltimore Maryland Transit Admin 13.7 627.0 579.0 559.8 1,765.88,270.6 901.9 827.4 734.4 2,463.7 10,812.1 -28.33% -23.51% NJJersey City Port Authority of NY & NJ 310.0 8,419.8 7,525.8 7,142.1 23,087.791,593.6 8,314.3 7,648.4 7,198.0 23,160.7 92,930.5 -0.32% -1.44% NJLindenwold Port Authority Transit Corp 38.8 1,007.1 892.3 856.8 2,756.210,789.6 965.6 903.7 834.4 2,703.7 10,839.1 1.94% -0.46% NYNew York MTA New York City Transit 8,764.7 246,416.1 217,615.8 206,064.1 670,096.02,629,594.2 240,031.6 225,996.7 217,512.9 683,541.2 2,699,536.3 -1.97% -2.59% NYNew York MTA Staten Island Railway 29.4 797.7 695.1 640.5 2,133.38,126.1 803.9 750.2 666.4 2,220.5 8,244.0 -3.93% -1.43% OHCleveland Greater Cleveland Reg TA 19.6 586.6 522.6 466.4 1,575.66,249.8 572.1 481.6 473.5 1,527.2 6,309.9 3.17% -0.95% PAPhiladelphia Southeastern Penn TA 327.7 8,596.3 7,825.4 7,331.1 23,752.893,546.4 9,087.7 8,473.1 7,740.2 25,301.0 91,772.0 -6.12% 1.93% PRSan Juan Puerto Rico DOT 21.0 538.0 455.3 405.1 1,398.45,192.9 0.0 0.0 83.1 83.1 4,834.5 >100% 7.41% REPORTED TOTAL 12,347.7 347,398.4 305,024.3 286,221.7938,644.4 3,714,370.2 339,955.5 316,344.7299,500.6 955,800.8 3,813,559.0 -1.79% -2.60% PROJECTED TOTAL 347,398.4 305,024.3 286,221.7938,644.4 3,714,370.2 339,955.5 316,344.7 299,500.6955,800.8 3,813,559.0 -1.79% -2.60% * Preliminary information based on data from reporting systems. Note: Data may differ from that included in Federal Transit Administration reports due to differences in data calculation procedures and in periods of time covered. (a) Transit agencies assigned by urbanized areas or urban places of less than 50,000 population outside urbanized areas based on 2000 U.S. Census Population. (b) Year-to-date ridership adjusted for data received after closing dates of previous issues. American Public Transportation Association 12-Apr-19 3 1300 Eye St NW, Suite 1200 E Contact: Matthew Dickens Washington, DC 20005 Senior Policy Analyst LIGHT RAIL Telephone: (202) 496-4817 Email: [email protected] PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION RIDERSHIP REPORT Fourth Quarter 2018 ESTIMATED UNLINKED TRANSIT PASSENGER TRIPS CURRENT YEAR (a)(b) PRECEDING YEAR (a)(b) % CHANGE (b) State and AVG OCT '18- JAN '18- OCT '17- JAN '17- 4th Qtr YTD Primary City Transit Agency WKDY OCT '18 NOV '18 DEC '18 DEC '18 DEC '18 OCT '17 NOV '17 DEC '17 DEC '17 DEC '17 Chng Chng (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's) (000's)(000's) (000's) AZPhoenix Valley Metro Rail, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road
    Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAIL ROAD. Spec. law of MD, February 28, 1827 Trackage, June 30, 1918: 2315.039 mi. First main track 774.892 mi. Second and other main tracks 1580.364 mi. Yard track and sidings Equipment Steam locomotives 2,242 Other locomotives 9 Freight cars 88,904 Passenger cars 1,243 Floating equipment 168 Work equipment 2,392 Miscellaneous 10 Equipment, leased Steam locomotives 16 to Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Steam locomotives 1 to Little Kanawha Railroad Steam locomotives 4 to Long Fork Railway Steam locomotives 1 to Morgantown and Kingwood Steam locomotives 5 to The Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Steam locomotives 6 to The Sharpsville Railroad Steam locomotives 30 to Staten Island Rapid Transit Steam locomotives 158 from Toledo and Cincinnati Freight cars 4 to Long Fork Railway Freight cars 5 to The Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Freight cars 5,732 from Toledo and Cincinnati Freight cars 976 from Mather Humane Stock Transportation Co. Passenger cars 1 to Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Passenger cars 3 to Long Fork Railway Passenger cars 4 to The Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Passenger cars 1 to The Sharpsville Railroad Passenger cars 110 from Toledo and Cincinnati Work equipment 2 to The Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Work equipment 57 to Staten Island Rapid Transit Miscellaneous 2 from Toledo and Cincinnati Miscellaneous 1 from Baltimore and Ohio in Pennsylvania Miscellaneous 7 from Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern The Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road controls the following companies:
    [Show full text]
  • Central Soma Plan Draft
    CHAPTER VI Alternatives CHAPTER VI Alternatives VI.A Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15126.6(a), state that an environmental impact report (EIR) must describe and evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project that would feasibly attain most of the project’s basic objectives, but that would avoid or substantially lessen any identified significant adverse environmental effects of the project. An EIR is not required to consider every conceivable alternative to a proposed project and is not required to consider alternatives that are infeasible. Rather, it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision-making and public participation. The EIR must evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives and include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed project. Specifically, the CEQA Guidelines set forth the following additional criteria for selecting and evaluating alternatives: ● [T]he discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly. (Section 15126.6(b)) ● The range of potential alternatives shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects. (Section 15126.6(c)) ● The specific alternative of “no project” shall also be evaluated along with its impact. (Section 15126.6(e)(1)) ● The alternatives shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-003880PCAMAP [Board File No
    Executive Summary Planning Code Text & Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2017 Project Name: Corona Heights Large Residence Special Use District Case Number: 2017-003880PCAMAP [Board File No. 170296] Initiated by: Supervisor Sheehy / Introduced March 21, 2017 / Reintroduced April 24, 2017 Staff Contact: Audrey Butkus, Legislative Affairs [email protected], 415-575-9129 Reviewed by: Aaron Starr, Manager of Legislative Affairs [email protected], 415-558-6362 Recommendation: Recommend Approval with Modifications PLANNING CODE AMENDMENT The proposed Ordinance would amend the Planning Code & Sectional Maps SU06 & SU07 of the Zoning Map to create the Corona Heights Large Residence Special Use District (the area within a perimeter established by Market Street, Clayton Street, Ashbury Street, Clifford Terrace, Roosevelt Way, Museum Way, the eastern property line of parcel 2620/063, the eastern property line of parcel 2619/001A, and Douglass Street; and in addition parcels fronting States Street), to promote and enhance neighborhood character and affordability by requiring Conditional Use authorization for large residential developments in the district. Proposed Corona Heights SUD boundaries. The Way It Is Now: 1. There is no residential use size limit within RH-1, RH-2 or RH-3 zoning districts. 2. Projects in RH-1 zoning districts have a 25% rear yard requirement. Project in RH-2 and RH-3 zoning districts have a 45% rear yard requirement that can be decreased through rear yard averaging up to 25% or 15 feet, whichever is greater. The Way It Would Be: 1. Residential developments within the subject area that are zoned RH-1, RH-2 or RH-3 would require Conditional Use authorization if the following residential use size limits are exceeded: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Employees Keeping Employees Safe and Well Is Critical for the Operation of Bay Area Public Transportation Providers
    Solano Transportation Authority Member Agencies: Benicia ♦ Dixon ♦ Fairfield ♦ Rio Vista ♦ Suisun City ♦ Vacaville ♦ Vallejo ♦ Solano County One Harbor Center, Ste. 130, Suisun City, CA 94585-2473 ♦ Phone (707) 424-6075 / Fax (707) 424-6074 Email: [email protected] ♦ Website: sta.ca.gov SOLANOEXPRESS INTERCITY TRANSIT CONSORTIUM 1:30 p.m., Tuesday, August 25, 2020 Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86203488385?pwd=RjN6Vk03d0pSYXJ2RlNjUlF0UU1CUT09 Meeting ID: 862 0348 8385 Passcode: 574201 Join by Phone Dial: 1(408) 638-0968 Webinar ID: 86203488385# MEETING AGENDA ITEM STAFF PERSON 1. CALL TO ORDER Beth Kranda, Chair 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT (1:30 –1:45 p.m.) 4. REPORTS FROM MTC, STA STAFF AND OTHER AGENCIES (1:35 – 1:40 p.m.) • Update on MTC’s Blue Ribbon Transit Recovery and Daryl Halls Partnership Board Seamless Subcommittee Task Force Vincent Ma • Update on SolanoExpress Marketing • Transit Operators – Emergency Contact List Daryl Halls/ Brandon Thomson 5. CONSENT CALENDAR Recommendation: Approve the following consent items in one motion. (1:45 – 1:50 p.m.) A. Minutes of the Consortium Meeting of June 23, 2020 Johanna Masiclat Recommendation: Approve the Consortium Meeting Minutes of June 23, 2020. Pg. 5 CONSORTIUM MEMBERS Louren Kotow Diane Feinstein Brandon Thomson Beth Kranda Lori DaMassa Joyce Goodwin Debbie McQuilkin VACANT (Chair) (Vice Chair) Dixon Fairfield and Rio Vista Solano County Vacaville County of Solano Mobility STA Readi-Ride Suisun Transit Delta Breeze Transit City Coach Solano (FAST) (SolTrans) Ron Grassi STA Staff The complete Consortium packet is available1 on STA’s website: www.sta.ca.gov 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Your Free Cheat Sheet on All Dog Friendly Things to Do in San
    A COMPLETE DOG FRIENDLY GUIDE TO SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco is one of the top dog friendly cities in USA. As a resident dog mom, you can find all my favorite dog friendly things to do, see, eat and enjoy in this one handy cheat sheet. 1. Alta Plaza Park-has off leash play area 2. Alamo Square Park-home to the famous Painted Ladies S 3. Bernal heights park-get a fantastic view from Bernal Hill K 4. Grand View Park-the 16th Avenue Mosaic steps lead this park with great views R 5. Sutro Heights Park-right next to Ocean beach (dog friendly) A 6. Mountain Lake Park-has a tranquil lake 7. John Mclaren Park P 8. Buena Vista Park 9. Lincoln Park G 10. Strawberry Hill (Golden Gate Park)-waterfall and Chinese pagoda 11.Duboce Park O 12.Dolores Park D 13.Lafayette Park 14. Precita Park S 1. Grand View Park H W T E 2. Corona Heights Park I I W 3. Tank Hill Park V S 4. Billy Goat Hill C I K 5. Mt. Davidson Park R M A 6. Bernal Heights Park A P R 7. Buena Vista Park O G 8. Kite Hill N O A D 9. Ina Coolbrith Park P S 1. Sutro open space reserve Y L L I 2. Mt. Davidson D A N 3. Glen Canyon Park R E T I 4. Presidio of San Francisco-Ecology Trail, R G Batteries to Bluffs Trail, Lovers lane F N I 5. Coastal Trail at Land's End G K O I 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Staten Island Railway Railway Timetable
    Effective Winter 2016 – 2017 MTA Staten Island Railway Railway Timetable ✪ NEW: ARTHUR KILL STATION MetroCard® may be purchased at vending machines located at St George terminal and at Tompkinsville station, and is accepted for both entering and leaving the railway at both locations as well. Now more than ever – MTA Staten Island Railway for speed and reliability Reduced-Fare Benefits – If you qualify for reduced fare, you can travel for half fare. You are eligible for reduced-fare benefit if you are at least 65 years of age or have a qualifying disability with proper identification. Benefits are available (except on peak-hour express buses) with proper identification, including Reduced-Fare MetroCard or Medicare card (Medicaid cards do not qualify). Children – The subway, SIR, local, Limited-Stop, and +SelectBusService buses permit up to three children, 44 inches tall and under, to ride free when accompanied by an adult paying full-fare. Express buses permit one child, two years old and under, to ride free when carried in the lap of a fare-paying adult. Holiday Service – On Martin Luther King Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Election Day, and the Day after Thanksgiving, SIR operates a Weekday Schedule. When New Years Day, Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day are celebrated Tuesday through Friday, SIR operates a Saturday Schedule; however, if these holidays are celebrated on Saturday, Sunday or Monday, SIR operates a Sunday Schedule. SIR will operate early departure “get-a-way” schedules on the evening before select holidays. Please refer to Service Information posters for details.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Architecture Guide 2020
    WHAT Architect WHERE Notes Zone 1: Fisherman’s Warf and the Piers + North Beach Pier 39 is a shopping center and popular tourist attraction built in 1978. The marina is also home to the floating Forbes Island restaurant. The sea lions at Pier 39 have become a tourist attraction in their own right. Although the reason for their migration to the pier *** Pier 39 Warren Simmons Pier 39 is unclear, the refurbishing of the docks in September 1989 required the removal of all boats from that area, leaving large open spaces for the sea lions to move into. Once the project was completed, boat owners returned, but did their best to navigate around the sea lions; no efforts were made to encourage the new guests to leave. Aquarium of the Bay was built in 1996 as an aquarium. It added additional attractions to the original building and has 273 species and more than 60,000 fish. Sharks circle overhead, manta rays sweep by and seaweed sways all around at the Aquarium of the Bay, where you * Aquarium of the Bay ? Pier 39 wander through glass tubes surrounded by sea life from San Francisco Bay. It's not for the claustrophobic, perhaps, but the thrilling fish- eye view, leaves kids and parents enthralled. General admission $27.95. Mon-Sun (10am-6pm) A few California sea lions began “hauling out” on PIER 39’s K-Dock shortly after the Loma Prieta earthquake hit San Francisco in October 1989. By January 1990, the boisterous barking pinnipeds started to *** Sea Lion Colony - Pier 39 arrive in droves and completely took over K-Dock, much to the exasperation of PIER 39’s Marina tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Staten Island Railway, a Unit of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, for the Period January 1, 2014 to September 12, 2017
    April 12, 2018 Mr. Joseph Lhota Chairman Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2 Broadway New York, NY 10004 Re: Selected Safety and Security Equipment at Train Stations Report 2017-S-84 Dear Mr. Lhota: Pursuant to the State Comptroller’s authority as set forth in Article X, Section 5 of the State Constitution and Section 2803 of the Public Authorities Law, we examined selected safety and security equipment at train stations at the Staten Island Railway, a unit of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, for the period January 1, 2014 to September 12, 2017. The objective of our audit was to determine whether the Staten Island Railway has taken appropriate action to ensure that equipment, such as cameras and Customer Assistance Intercoms, are working, tested, maintained, and monitored. Background Staten Island Railway (SIR) is a subsidiary of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). Administratively, SIR is a separate operating unit, reporting to New York City Transit’s (Transit) Department of Subways. SIR operates a single rapid transit line that runs the length of Staten Island (about 14 miles) from St. George Terminal to the southern terminal at Tottenville. SIR’s management oversees capital projects at its 21 train stations, maintains the stations’ structural components, and ensures that security equipment installed at the stations is working, monitored, and tested. As of June 8, 2017, SIR had 199 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras, 42 stand-alone cameras, and 43 Customer Assistance Intercoms (CAI) – intended for customer use in emergencies – at an estimated cost of approximately $21 million for the new system, excluding the stand-alone cameras.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald W. Furler Collection
    Donald W. Furler Collection Finding Aid to the Collection at the Center for Railroad Photography & Art Prepared by Adrienne Evans Last updated: 06/19/19 Collection Summary Title: Donald W. Furler Collection Accession Number: 2017.1 Span Dates: 1931-1956 Bulk Dates: 1938-1952 Creator: Furler, Donald Ward, 1917-1994 Extent: 25 archival binders (8.34 linear feet) Language: English Repository: Center for Railroad Photography & Art, Madison, WI Abstract: This collection is composed of photographic images shot by Donald Ward Furler (1917-1994). The bulk of the collection was photographed by Furler, but it also includes work he collected from other rail photographers. Images in the collection primarily depict American railroads, mainly located in New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. Selected Search Terms Country: Canada United States State: Alabama New York California North Dakota Colorado Ohio Connecticut Ontario (Canada) District of Columbia Pennsylvania Georgia Quebec (Canada) Illinois Saskatchewan (Canada) Iowa Tennessee Kansas Texas Maryland Vermont Massachusetts Virginia Minnesota West Virginia Missouri Montana Montreal (Canada) New Hampshire New Jersey Donald W. Furler Collection 2 Railroad Name: Franklin and Carolina Railroad (Camp A.A. Morrison and Company, Inc. Manufacturing Company) Adirondack Railway Grand Trunk Western Railroad Alton and Southern Railway Company Grand Trunk Railway Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Gifford-Hill and Company Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Harlem Transfer Company Atlantic and North Carolina Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Film Locations in San Francisco
    Film Locations in San Francisco Title Release Year Locations A Jitney Elopement 1915 20th and Folsom Streets A Jitney Elopement 1915 Golden Gate Park Greed 1924 Cliff House (1090 Point Lobos Avenue) Greed 1924 Bush and Sutter Streets Greed 1924 Hayes Street at Laguna The Jazz Singer 1927 Coffee Dan's (O'Farrell Street at Powell) Barbary Coast 1935 After the Thin Man 1936 Coit Tower San Francisco 1936 The Barbary Coast San Francisco 1936 City Hall Page 1 of 588 10/02/2021 Film Locations in San Francisco Fun Facts Production Company The Essanay Film Manufacturing Company During San Francisco's Gold Rush era, the The Essanay Film Manufacturing Company Park was part of an area designated as the "Great Sand Waste". In 1887, the Cliff House was severely Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) damaged when the schooner Parallel, abandoned and loaded with dynamite, ran aground on the rocks below. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Warner Bros. Pictures The Samuel Goldwyn Company The Tower was funded by a gift bequeathed Metro-Goldwyn Mayer by Lillie Hitchcock Coit, a socialite who reportedly liked to chase fires. Though the tower resembles a firehose nozzle, it was not designed this way. The Barbary Coast was a red-light district Metro-Goldwyn Mayer that was largely destroyed in the 1906 earthquake. Though some of the establishments were rebuilt after the earthquake, an anti-vice campaign put the establishments out of business. The dome of SF's City Hall is almost a foot Metro-Goldwyn Mayer Page 2 of 588 10/02/2021 Film Locations in San Francisco Distributor Director Writer General Film Company Charles Chaplin Charles Chaplin General Film Company Charles Chaplin Charles Chaplin Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Warner Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2010 SMART Transportation Newsletter
    Volume 4 2 February 2010 N u m b e r 2 www.utuia.org www.utu.org The Official Publication of the United Transportation Union NTSB wants cameras, voice recorders in locomotives The National Transportation Safety Board has The engineer’s prolific text messaging, cell phones and other recommended that railroads install inward-fac- messaging was “egregious,” NTSB personal electronic devices have ing cameras and voice recorders in every loco- chairwoman Deborah A.P. Hers- proven inadequate. motive cab in the nation, warning that cell man said, citing records of his The NTSB does not have phone texting by engineers and conductors is a phone use. “This was an accident authority to require installation growing and lethal danger. waiting to happen.” of inward-facing cameras and The NTSB made its recommendation in the The NTSB said the Union voice recorders, but is asking the wake of its investigation into the deadly collision Pacific conductor on the freight FRA to require such installation. of a commuter train and a freight train in train the Metrolink commuter Rail labor has long contended Chatsworth, Calif., in 2008 – a crash that killed train slammed into also was that such cameras and voice 25 and injured 135, which the NTSB blamed on improperly texting. recorders are an invasion of pri- a Metrolink engineer who passed a stop signal Only constant monitoring vacy and that the fail-safe nature while text messaging. would have stopped the of PTC will prevent collisions Metrolink engineer, who died in such as that at Chatsworth. the collision, from texting, Hers- The FRA, in October 2008, News and Notes man said.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum T ^ ^ ^ L-8 9-63 TO
    UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT R^f-R°AD RETIREMENT BOARD .. r i j u n / iyoy Memorandum T ^ ^ ^ L-8 9-63 TO . Director of Compensation and Certification from : Deputy General Counsel SUBJECT: Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority Employer Status This is to notify you that pursuant to a request by Mr. Albert C. Cosenza, Vice President and General Counsel of the Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority (SIRTOA), I have determined that SIRTOA ceased to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) effective September 21, 1987. SIRTOA has previously been ruled to be an employer under the Acts with service creditable from July 1, 1971. See Legal Opinion L-71-177. The evidence in file shows that in 1970 the City of New York purchased from the Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Company (Railway Company) , a subsidiary of the Baltimore St Ohio Railroad, a 14.5 mile length of track on Staten Island, New York, stretching from St. George to Tottenville. The City intended to conduct commuter rail service over the line. The Railway Company retained another 16.7 miles of track on Staten Island, and obtained from the City freight service trackage rights over the St. George - Tottenville line. Freight service was estimated at the time to be 7,000 cars annually. The City agreed to maintain the line for the joint use of commuter and freight service. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) of New York City formed SIRTOA as an instrumentality to operate the line. SIRTOA requested a determination as to its status as an employer under the RRA and RUIA.
    [Show full text]