DOCSLIB.ORG

Weed Risk Assessment for Neptunia Oleracea Lour. (Fabaceae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weed Risk Assessment for Neptunia Oleracea Lour. (Fabaceae) Weed Risk Assessment for Neptunia United States oleracea Lour. (Fabaceae) – Water Department of Agriculture mimosa Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service June 14, 2012 Version 1 Top left: Neptunia oleracea plants in flower; top right: Spongy, floating stem tissue of Neptunia oleracea; bottom: A colony of Neptunia oleracea plants (source: Technigro, 2011). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Neptunia oleracea Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use weed risk assessment (WRA) —specifically, the PPQ WRA model1—to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. Because our WRA model is geographically and climatically neutral, it can be used to evaluate the baseline invasive/weed potential of any plant species for the entire United States or any area within it. We use a climate matching tool in our WRAs to evaluate those areas of the United States that are suitable for the establishment of the plant. We also use a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the consequences of uncertainty on the outcome of the risk assessment. For more information on the PPQ WRA process, please refer to the document, Introduction to the PPQ Weed Risk Assessment Process, which is available upon request. Neptunia oleracea Lour. – Water mimosa Species Family: Fabaceae Information Initiation: On October 27, 2011, the Exotic Pest Information Collection and Analysis (EPICA) program reported that a population of Neptunia oleracea had been found in Arkansas in 2009, in the Little Maumelle River, along the Arkansas River flood plain (Peck and Serviss, 2011). This was the first detection of naturalized populations of N. oleracea in the United States. Joel Bard, the Arkansas State Plant Health Director, is concerned that stem fragments of N. oleracea could move downstream, allowing the plant to establish in more favorable, warmer areas of the United States. Foreign distribution: Neptunia oleracea is thought to be native to South America and introduced to other areas of the world (Bentham, 1875). Neptunia oleracea now occurs in Mexico and in over 50 countries in Central and South America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Asia (Windler, 1966). U.S. distribution and status: A colony of N. oleracea was detected in Arkansas in 2009 (Peck and Serviss, 2011). James Peck, professor of biology at Arkansas State University, says that a few stem fragments could still be found in 2011 (Peck and Serviss, 2011). Neptunia oleracea is available through the water garden and aquarium trade (Peck and Serviss, 2011; Ponds Plants and More, 2011; The Flowering Garden, 2011; The Water Garden, 2011Ponds Plants and More, 2011 #46}), so it may be present in other states in cultivation. WRA area: Entire United States, including territories 1 Koop, A., L. Fowler, L. Newton, and B. Caton. 2012. Development and validation of a weed screening tool for the United States. Biological Invasions 14(2):273-294. DOI:10.1007/s10530-011-0061-4 Ver 1. (Original) June 14, 2012 1 Weed Risk Assessment for Neptunia oleracea 1. Neptunia oleracea analysis Establishment/Spread Neptunia oleracea is a nitrogen-fixing aquatic plant (Yanasugondha and Buranakarl, Potential 1981) that roots on the edges of water bodies and then forms dense, floating mats of stems that spread rapidly over the water surface (Peck and Serviss, 2011; Windler, 1966). This plant is native to South America and has naturalized in over 50 countries in South and Central America, Africa, and Asia (Windler, 1966). Neptunia oleracea is propagated by seeds and stem fragments that are dispersed by water (Australian Weeds Committee, 2011; Technigro, 2011), therefore mutilation facilitates the spread of this species. People can spread seeds in mud attached to machinery and vehicles (Technigro, 2011). This risk element had average (moderate) uncertainty because we could not answer questions about the number of seeds produced, minimum generative time, and if N. oleracea can form seed banks. Risk score = 14 Uncertainty index = 0.18 Impact Potential Neptunia oleracea produces dense, floating mats that can replace native wetland plants, block water flow in creeks and drains, restrict boat access, reduce water quality, and kill native plants and fish (Australian Weeds Committee, 2011; Queensland Government, 2009). Neptunia oleracea is listed as a Class 1 Pest Plant (introduction into the state is prohibited, and landowners must take reasonable steps to keep land free of this species) in Queensland, Australia (Queensland Government, 2009), where it is controlled in natural ecosystems through mechanical and chemical controls (Technigro, 2011). In urban/suburban environments, it restricts boat access, blocks drains, and creates a favorable habitat for certain species of mosquitoes (Queensland Government, 2009). Neptunia oleracea has also been reported as a weed of rice fields in southeast Asia (IRRI, 1993; Moody, 1989). This risk element had an average amount of uncertainty. Risk score = 3.1 Uncertainty index = 0.12 Geographic Potential Neptunia oleracea is an aquatic plant that grows in wetlands, bodies of fresh water, and slow-running tropical rivers (Bentham, 1875; Windler, 1966). To evaluate its potential distribution in the United States, we had to determine if it could survive the winters where it was found in the Little Maumelle River in Arkansas, a region in USDA Plant Hardiness Zone 8. We consulted with Dr. Brett Serviss, a plant biologist at Henderson State University who co-authored the paper reporting the Arkansas colony of N. oleracea. Dr. Serviss thought that N. oleracea might be able to overwinter in Arkansas during warm winters if the water did not freeze, but he did not think that the N. oleracea colony would be able to expand and spread in Arkansas (Serviss, 2011). However, Dr. James Peck, the biology professor from Arkansas State University who found the Arkansas colony, reported that a few stem fragments of the original Arkansas colony remain, suggesting that, at least for the last few years, it has been able to survive cold winter temperatures (Peck, 2011). He reports that stem fragments seem to sink into the water in the fall, thus avoiding the freezing ice. It is also possible, however, that the population has survived only because it is recolonized by people growing the plant as a vegetable. In our analysis, we assumed that N. oleracea can survive in Plant Hardiness Zone 8. We estimate that about 20 percent of the United States is suitable for the establishment of N. oleracea (Fig. 1). The predicted distribution is based on the species’ known distribution elsewhere in the world and includes point-referenced localities and areas of occurrence (GBIF, 2011). The map for Neptunia oleracea Ver 1. (Original) June 14, 2012 2 Weed Risk Assessment for Neptunia oleracea includes the joint distribution of USDA Plant Hardiness Zones 8-13, areas with 0- 100+ inches of annual precipitation, and the following Köppen-Geiger climate classes: tropical rainforest, tropical savanna, steppe, desert, humid subtropical, and marine west coast. Entry Potential We did not assess entry potential because N. oleracea has already naturalized in Arkansas (Peck and Serviss, 2011) and is cultivated in U.S. aquariums and water gardens (The Water Garden, 2011; The Flowering Garden, 2011; Ponds Plants and More, 2011). Figure 1. Predicted distribution of Neptunia oleracea in the United States. Map insets for Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico are not to scale. Ver 1. (Original) June 14, 2012 3 Weed Risk Assessment for Neptunia oleracea 2. Results and Conclusion Model Probabilities: P(Major Invader) = 73.7% P(Minor Invader) = 25.3% P(Non-Invader) = 1.1% Risk Result = High Risk Secondary Screening = Not applicable Figure 2. Neptunia oleracea risk score (black box) relative to the risk scores of species used to develop and validate the WRA model (other symbols). See Appendix A for the complete assessment. Figure 3. Monte Carlo simulation results (N=5000) for uncertainty around Neptunia oleracea’s risk scoresa. a The blue “+” symbol represents the medians of the simulated outcomes. The smallest box contains 50 percent of the outcomes, the second 95 percent, and the largest 99 percent. Ver 1. (Original) June 14, 2012 4 Weed Risk Assessment for Neptunia oleracea 3. Discussion The result of the WRA for N. oleracea is High Risk. Neptunia oleracea is a floating aquatic plant that spreads quickly over the surface of fresh bodies of water and replaces native wetland plants, blocks water flow in creeks and drains, restricts boat access, and reduces water quality (Queensland Government, 2009). Comparison of N. oleracea to the 204 species used in the validation study indicates that it shares many of the same traits and impacts as other major- and high-scoring minor-invaders (Fig. 2). In the uncertainty analysis, the simulated risk scores all resulted in a conclusion of High Risk (Fig. 3), indicating that the overall model conclusion is highly robust. In this WRA, we considered Plant Hardiness Zones 8 and above as suitable for the establishment of Neptunia oleracea. If only Zones 9 and higher are suitable for this species, then we estimate that approximately 6 percent (versus 20 percent) of the United States is suitable for this species.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • F Guide to Noxious Weed Prevention Practices
    Prevention Restoration Detection Monitoring Control USDA - FOREST SERVICE Guide to Noxious Weed Prevention Practices 2 INDEX Introduction…………………………………………………………………...4 Supporting Direction…………………………………………………………4 Using This Guide……………………………………………………………...5 General Weed Prevention Practices for Site-disturbing Projects and Maintenance Programs………………………………………..6 Aquatic Weed Prevention Practices…………………………………………8 Cultural Resources…………………………………………………………..10 Fire Management Pre-fire, Pre-incident Training………………………………………10 Plans…………………………………………………………………...10 Wildfires-General…………………………………………………….10 Prescribed Fire………………………………………………………..11 Fire Rehabilitation……………………………………………………11 Forest Vegetation Management Timber Harvest Operations & Stewardship Contracting…………12 Post Vegetation Management Operations…………………………..13 Grazing Management……………………………………………………….13 Lands and Special Uses……………………………………………………...15 Minerals………………………………………………………………………16 Recreation, Wilderness, and Special Management Areas………………....16 Research Activities…………………………………………………………...17 Road Management New and Reconstruction………………………………………………17 Road Maintenance and Decommissioning…………………………...17 Version 1.0, Dated July 5, 2001 3 Watershed Management…………………………………………………….18 Wildlife, Fisheries, and Botany……………………………………………...19 Appendix 1, Forest Service Timber Sale Contract Provisions…………....20 Appendix 2, Sample Special Use Supplemental Clause………..…………..23 Appendix 3, Example of a Closure Order………………….……………….25 Version 1.0, Dated July 5, 2001 4 USDA-Forest Service GUIDE TO NOXIOUS
    [Show full text]
  • (Catclaw) Mimosa Managed Forests (Mimosa Pigra L.,Syn
    Black (Catclaw) Mimosa Managed Forests (Mimosa pigra L.,Syn. Mimosa pellita Kunch ex Willd.) Victor Maddox, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Associate, Mississippi State University Randy Westbrooks, Ph.D., Invasive Species Specialist, U.S. Geological Survey John D. Byrd, Jr., Ph.D., Extension/Research Professor, Mississippi State University Fig. 1. Black, catclaw, or lollipop mi- Fig. 2. Black Mimosa Showing Hairy Stems and Fig. 3. Black Mimosa Showing Flowerhead and Bristly mosa is a sprawling shrub native to Bipinnate Leaves (USDA APHIS PPQ Archive, Fruit (USDA APHIS PPQ Archive, USDA APHIS PPQ, Central America. USDA APHIS PPQ, Bugwood.org. Bugwood.org) Introduction Problems Caused Black, catclaw, or lollipop mimosa (Mimosa pigra L.,Syn. Mimosa pellita Kunch ex Willd.) is a sprawling shrub native to Central America. Other common names include giant sensitive-plant and shamebush. It was introduced into Florida sometime prior to 1953 and escaped. It is not clear if it was introduced into Florida as an ornamental or the introduction was accidental. It has proved to be a serious invasive plant in wetlands in Thailand, Australia, and Florida. Having spines and forming dense thickets to 20’ high, it can displace native species and form a barrier to animal and human activity. Although it can be a serious weed in wetlands, it may also inhabit drier sites. The presence of spines on stems and leaves may implicate it as a threat in pastures. Regulations Black mimosa is a Federal Noxious weed in the United States. It is a Class A noxious weed in Alabama, North Carolina, and Vermont and a Noxious weed in Florida and Hawaii.
    [Show full text]
  • Noxious Weed Impacts Weed Identification
    National Invasive Species Library Statewide Noxious Weed Awareness and Education NOXIOUS WEED IMPACTS Growing What's So Pains. Why Should Dangerous Facts I Care about About the about Noxious Impacts of Weed Noxious Weeds Weeds? Restoring Invasions on the Ecology in the and Economy native wildlife habitat for Western of Montana? today and United (being updated for a tomorrow. States. regional audience) Greater Yellowstone US Department R.L. Sheley et al. 2005. Coordinating of the Interior Montana State University Committee Noxious Bureau of Land Extension Bulletin 152 Weed Subcommittee Management WEED IDENTIFICATION Identification is Key to Zero Weed Pocket Spread weed management. Early Detection Rapid Response Cards US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Guide Conservation Service, Montana Department of Yellow Starthistle - Leafy Spurge - Dalmatian Toadflax - Greater Yellowstone Agriculture, and Montana State University Statewide Spotted Knapweed. A weed you should get to know. Coordinating Committee Noxious Weed Awareness and Education Campaign Center for Invasive Plant Management Protect our water resources with Zero Spread aquatics management. 2006. US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service and Montana Statewide Noxious Weed Awareness and Education Campaign (POSTER) Not All Alien Invaders Eurasian Are From Outer Space. watermilfoil Somewhere out there, in a An Aggressive remote part of the world, a Non-Native Water Weed. creature awaits ... The S.O.S. Unknown Invader Save our Shores Scaryus eatumpis
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Checklist of Aquatic Plants of Myanmar and Thailand
    Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1019 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1019 Taxonomic paper An updated checklist of aquatic plants of Myanmar and Thailand Yu Ito†, Anders S. Barfod‡ † University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand ‡ Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Corresponding author: Yu Ito ([email protected]) Academic editor: Quentin Groom Received: 04 Nov 2013 | Accepted: 29 Dec 2013 | Published: 06 Jan 2014 Citation: Ito Y, Barfod A (2014) An updated checklist of aquatic plants of Myanmar and Thailand. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1019. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1019 Abstract The flora of Tropical Asia is among the richest in the world, yet the actual diversity is estimated to be much higher than previously reported. Myanmar and Thailand are adjacent countries that together occupy more than the half the area of continental Tropical Asia. This geographic area is diverse ecologically, ranging from cool-temperate to tropical climates, and includes from coast, rainforests and high mountain elevations. An updated checklist of aquatic plants, which includes 78 species in 44 genera from 24 families, are presented based on floristic works. This number includes seven species, that have never been listed in the previous floras and checklists. The species (excluding non-indigenous taxa) were categorized by five geographic groups with the exception of to reflect the rich diversity of the countries' floras. Keywords Aquatic plants, flora, Myanmar, Thailand © Ito Y, Barfod A. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Mimosa (Neptunia Oleracea)
    Invasive plant risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Water mimosa NeNeptunia oleracea Dead and awake Neptunia plena Steve Csurhes First published 2008 Updated 2016 PR08–3686 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/au/deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Contents Identity and taxonomy 2 Neptunia oleracea Lour. 2 Neptunia plena (L.) Benth. 2 Taxonomy and genetics 2 Descriptions (from Windler 1966) 3 Neptunia oleracea 3 Neptunia plena 4 Reproduction and dispersal 5 Seed longevity 5 Origin 5 History of introduction 5 Worldwide distribution 6 Neptunia oleracea 6 Neptunia plena 7 Distribution in Australia 8 Preferred habitat and climate 9 History as a weed overseas and interstate 9 Impact 10 N2 fixation 10 Effect on water resources 10 Economic benefits 10 Ponded pasture 10 Horticultural crop 11 Herbal medicine 11 Pest potential in Queensland 12 Biological control 12 References 13 Invasive plant risk assessment: Water mimosa Neptunia oleracea Dead and awake Neptunia plena 1 Identity and taxonomy Neptunia oleracea Lour. Synonyms: Acacia lacustris Desf., Desmanthus lacustris Willd., D. natans Willd., D. stolonifer DC, Mimosa aquatica Pers., M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornamental Garden Plants of the Guianas Pt. 2
    Surinam (Pulle, 1906). 8. Gliricidia Kunth & Endlicher Unarmed, deciduous trees and shrubs. Leaves alternate, petiolate, odd-pinnate, 1- pinnate. Inflorescence an axillary, many-flowered raceme. Flowers papilionaceous; sepals united in a cupuliform, weakly 5-toothed tube; standard petal reflexed; keel incurved, the petals united. Stamens 10; 9 united by the filaments in a tube, 1 free. Fruit dehiscent, flat, narrow; seeds numerous. 1. Gliricidia sepium (Jacquin) Kunth ex Grisebach, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Gottingen 7: 52 (1857). MADRE DE CACAO (Surinam); ACACIA DES ANTILLES (French Guiana). Tree to 9 m; branches hairy when young; poisonous. Leaves with 4-8 pairs of leaflets; leaflets elliptical, acuminate, often dark-spotted or -blotched beneath, to 7 x 3 (-4) cm. Inflorescence to 15 cm. Petals pale purplish-pink, c.1.2 cm; standard petal marked with yellow from middle to base. Fruit narrowly oblong, somewhat woody, to 15 x 1.2 cm; seeds up to 11 per fruit. Range: Mexico to South America. Grown as an ornamental in the Botanic Gardens, Georgetown, Guyana (Index Seminum, 1982) and in French Guiana (de Granville, 1985). Grown as a shade tree in Surinam (Ostendorf, 1962). In tropical America this species is often interplanted with coffee and cacao trees to shade them; it is recommended for intensified utilization as a fuelwood for the humid tropics (National Academy of Sciences, 1980; Little, 1983). 9. Pterocarpus Jacquin Unarmed, nearly evergreen trees, sometimes lianas. Leaves alternate, petiolate, odd- pinnate, 1-pinnate; leaflets alternate. Inflorescence an axillary or terminal panicle or raceme. Flowers papilionaceous; sepals united in an unequally 5-toothed tube; standard and wing petals crisped (wavy); keel petals free or nearly so.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Risk to Neptunia Oleracea Lour. by the Moth, Neurostrota Gunniella (Busck), a Biological Control Agent for Mimosa Pigra L
    Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 449 4-14 July 1999, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA Neal R. Spencer [ed.]. pp. 449-457 (2000) Assessing the Risk to Neptunia oleracea Lour. by the Moth, Neurostrota gunniella (Busck), a Biological Control Agent for Mimosa pigra L. I. W. FORNO1, J. FICHERA1, and S. PRIOR2 1CSIRO Entomology, PMB 3, Indooroopilly Q4069, Australia 2Present Address: Department of Natural Resources, Magazine Street, Sherwood Q4075, Australia Abstract Mimosa pigra L. is native to tropical America and is an aggressive, invasive weed on the flood plains of the Northern Territory of Australia and in several countries in Southeast Asia. Neurostrota gunniella (Busck) (Gracillariidae) was introduced into Australia from Mexico in 1986 for biological control of mimosa. It was released in 1989 following com- pletion of extensive host range studies which determined that the moth bred readily on M. pigra and to a much lesser extent on Neptunia dimorphantha Domin, N. gracilis Benth., N. major (Benth.) Windler, N. monosperma F. Muell. and M. pudica L. Damage to these non-target species was assessed as insignificant. Subsequently, this moth was introduced to Thailand where quarantine studies showed substantial attack on an important vegetable, N. oleracea Lour., which is a perennial, aquatic herb which either grows prostrate near the water’s edge or floats by forming spongy aerenchyma around the stems. N. gunniella was not released in Southeast Asia. Further studies showed that N. gunniella oviposits and breeds similarly on potted M. pigra and the terrestrial form of N. oleracea but fewer eggs are laid and larval mortality is much greater on N.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Protection and Weed Control
    Noxious and Invasive Weed Update Plant Protection and Weed Control Spring 2019 The “Other” Weeds List We have discussed noxious move- antine for the two Old weeds and the law that ment of World bluestem species, regulates them in Kansas all fed- Caucasian and Yellow Special points of interest: quite a bit in these articles erally bluestem. This one will be so this time I thought we listed a little different in that it • Parasitism is one of three types of might mix things up a bit noxious will only quarantine the symbiosis, or close relationships and discuss another law weeds. seeds and roots rather between two different species. The While three types of symbiosis are: that regulates other weeds than the plants them- in other ways. The Plant only a few of the more selves. This will help re- Mutualism, in which both species • Pest and Agriculture Com- than 100 species on the duce the introduction and benefit, modity Certification Act federal noxious weed list spread of the species. • Commensalism, in which one spe- (K.S.A. 2-2112, et seq.), could potentially infest This same quarantine can, cies benefits and the other is unaf- allows for certain plant Kansas, we have listed all fected, and and is, used pests to be quarantined. A of them to ensure we don’t for other • Parasitism, in which one species quarantine means that the get surprised in the future. threatening benefits and the other is harmed. species listed cannot be This also allows us to help pests out moved into, or within, the the federal government in their work to stop the there like the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicides and Noxious Weeds: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
    Herbicides and Noxious Weeds: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Kim Goodwin Research Associate, Center for Invasive Species Management Jane Mangold Assistant Professor, Extension Invasive Plant Specialist Cecil Tharp Extension Pesticide Education Specialist Why are you killing those pretty flowers? The Montana County Weed Control Act requires landowners to control noxious weeds, including those with attractive flowers. Many of these plants were originally brought to the U.S. from Eurasia for ornamental and landscape use. They escaped cultivation and invaded native habitats where they now cause serious environmental problems. Noxious weeds with showy flowers include Dalmatian leafy spurge - Clinton Shock, Oregon State University toadflax, saltcedar, oxeye daisy and others. The widespread use of pesticides to control pests on What are noxious weeds? crops for agricultural productivity has raised concern The Montana County Weed Control Act designates noxious weeds about chronic effects to the environment and human as priority plants for control by landowners by rule of the Montana health. Because pesticides are a concern to the Department of Agriculture or a county weed district. A noxious weed public, noxious weed crews may receive questions is a plant that meets the following criteria: about herbicides and how they affect us and our • Is non-native or exotic to Montana, and environment. • When introduced, may render land unfit for agriculture, forestry, This brochure presents an overview of commonly livestock, wildlife, or other beneficial uses, or may harm native asked questions posed by the public. Questions focus plant communities. on the use of herbicides to control noxious weeds Certain noxious weeds are invasive. They invade native habitats and on non-crop sites, such as rangelands and pastures, then spread, outcompeting and displacing native plants, causing forests and roadway rights-of-way, and the potential significant losses of grazing land and wildlife habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Year Round Gardening My Battle with Noxious Weeds
    Year Round Gardening My Battle with Noxious Weeds Kitty West, Colorado Master Gardener Since 2015, I have battled the noxious weeds on our Black Forest property; specifically, Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), Diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and Common mullein (Verbascum thapsus). I have not won this war, but currently, there are no large patches of these weeds on my land. A noxious weed is an alien (non-native) plant which causes damage to agricultural or natural ecosystems. The plant must have been designated as noxious by a governmental body to be included as a noxious species. Landowners are required to control designated species under Colorado State Law. Acceptable controls can range from simply preventing spread to mandatory eradication, What a landowner is required to do depends on the specific weed. El Paso County has an excellent pamphlet available– Noxious Weeds and Control Methods available online at Newt sitting by some Mullein https://communityservices.elpasoco.com/wp- content/uploads/Environmental-Division-Picture/Noxious-Weeds/Noxious-Weed- Control-Book.pdf. Weeds can spread readily via dispersal of seeds, producing thousands of seeds per plant in a season. Common mullein can produce in excess of 200,000 seeds per plant! Those seeds are viable for decades. They germinate when the soil temperature is within an appropriate range and there is sufficient oxygen and water, generally in disturbed soil. I use only manual methods (pulling and digging) to eradicate the weeds on our property. This method has been successful, but it is not a one-and-done. From May through October- I prowl for weeds on my walk almost daily walks.
    [Show full text]
  • TPG Index Volumes 1-35 1986-2020
    Public Garden Index – Volumes 1-35 (1986 – 2020) #Giving Tuesday. HOW DOES YOUR GARDEN About This Issue (continued) GROW ? Swift 31 (3): 25 Dobbs, Madeline (continued) #givingTuesday fundraising 31 (3): 25 Public garden management: Read all #landscapechat about it! 26 (W): 5–6 Corona Tools 27 (W): 8 Rocket science leadership. Interview green industry 27 (W): 8 with Elachi 23 (1): 24–26 social media 27 (W): 8 Unmask your garden heroes: Taking a ValleyCrest Landscape Companies 27 (W): 8 closer look at earned revenue. #landscapechat: Fostering green industry 25 (2): 5–6 communication, one tweet at a time. Donnelly, Gerard T. Trees: Backbone of Kaufman 27 (W): 8 the garden 6 (1): 6 Dosmann, Michael S. Sustaining plant collections: Are we? 23 (3/4): 7–9 AABGA (American Association of Downie, Alex. Information management Botanical Gardens and Arboreta) See 8 (4): 6 American Public Gardens Association Eberbach, Catherine. Educators without AABGA: The first fifty years. Interview by borders 22 (1): 5–6 Sullivan. Ching, Creech, Lighty, Mathias, Eirhart, Linda. Plant collections in historic McClintock, Mulligan, Oppe, Taylor, landscapes 28 (4): 4–5 Voight, Widmoyer, and Wyman 5 (4): 8–12 Elias, Thomas S. Botany and botanical AABGA annual conference in Essential gardens 6 (3): 6 resources for garden directors. Olin Folsom, James P. Communication 19 (1): 7 17 (1): 12 Rediscovering the Ranch 23 (2): 7–9 AAM See American Association of Museums Water management 5 (3): 6 AAM accreditation is for gardens! SPECIAL Galbraith, David A. Another look at REPORT. Taylor, Hart, Williams, and Lowe invasives 17 (4): 7 15 (3): 3–11 Greenstein, Susan T.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Forest Service Manual 2080 Noxious Weed Management
    : APPENDIX E FOREST SERVICE MANUAL 2080 NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT E-1 R1 SUPPLEMENT 2000-2001-1 2080 EFFECTIVE DATE: 05/14/2001 Page 2 of 18 DURATION: Effective until superseded or removed FSM 2000 – NATIONAL FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ZERO CODE 2080 – NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NORTHERN REGION (REGION 1) MISSOULA, MT. FSM 2000 – NATIONAL FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ZERO CODE 2080 – NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT Supplement No.: R1 2000-2001-1 Effective Date: May 14, 2001 Duration: Effective until superseded or removed Approved: KATHY A. MCALLISTER Date Approved: 04/27/2001 Acting Regional Forester Posting Instructions: Supplements are numbered consecutively by Title and calendar year. Post by document name. Remove entire document and replace with this supplement. Retain this transmittal as the first page of this document. New Document(s): 2080 16 Pages Superseded Document(s): None. (This is the first supplement to this 0 Pages Manual.) Digest: This supplement implements an Integrated Weed Management approach for management of noxious weeds on National Forest System lands in Region 1. E-2 R1 SUPPLEMENT 2000-2001-1 2080 EFFECTIVE DATE: 05/14/2001 Page 3 of 18 DURATION: Effective until superseded or removed FSM 2000 – NATIONAL FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ZERO CODE 2080 – NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT 2080.4 - Responsibility. Encourage weed awareness and education in employee development and training plans and orientation for both field and administrative work. 2080.43 - Forest Supervisor. Forest Supervisors are responsible for: 1. Emphasizing weed awareness and weed prevention in all fire training, especially resource advisors, fire management teams, guard school, and district orientation. 2. Adding weed awareness and prevention education to Fire Effects and Prescribed Fire training.
    [Show full text]