DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Compton 2030 Comprehensive General Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Compton 2030 Comprehensive General Plan Update CITY OF COMPTON GENERAL PLAN 2030 DRAFT CITY OF COMPTON 2030 COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF COMPTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 205 SOUTH WILLOWBROOK AVENUE COMPTON, CALIFORNIA 90220 PREPARED BY: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 16388 E. COLIMA ROAD, SUITE 206 HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 91745 NOVEMBER 6, 2014 PAGE 1 CITY OF COMPTON GENERAL PLAN 2030 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PAGE 2 CITY OF COMPTON GENERAL PLAN 2030 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1.1 Purpose and Authority ............................................................................................................... 1.2 Overview of Compton ................................................................................................................ 1.3 Planning Process ........................................................................................................................ 1.4 Sphere of Influence ................................................................................................................... 2. Land Use Element ............................................................................................................. 2.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 2.2 Land Use Element Background Report .................................................................................... 2.3 Land Use Plan ............................................................................................................................ 3. Circulation Element .......................................................................................................... 3.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 3.2 Circulation Element Background Report ................................................................................. 3.3 Circulation Plan ........................................................................................................................... 4. Conservation, Open Space, and Recreation Element ......................................................... 4.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 4.2 Conservation, Open Space, and Recreation Background Report ............................................ 4.3 Resource Management Plan ...................................................................................................... 5. Public Safety Element ....................................................................................................... 5.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 5.2 Public Safety Element Background Report .............................................................................. 5.3 Public Safety Plan ....................................................................................................................... 6. Economic Development Element ...................................................................................... 6.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 6.2 Economic Development Background Report ........................................................................... 6.3 Economic Development Element Plan ..................................................................................... 7. Urban Design Element ...................................................................................................... 7.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 7.2 Urban Design Background Report ............................................................................................ 7.3 Urban Design Plan ..................................................................................................................... 8. Air Quality Element .......................................................................................................... 8.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 8.2 Air Quality Background Report ................................................................................................. 8.3 Air Quality Plan .......................................................................................................................... 9. Noise Element ................................................................................................................... 9.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 9.2 Noise Element Background Report ........................................................................................... 9.3 Noise Mitigation Plan ................................................................................................................ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3 CITY OF COMPTON GENERAL PLAN 2030 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page 10. Health Element ................................................................................................................. 10.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 10.2 Health Background Report ........................................................................................................ 10.3 Health Plan ................................................................................................................................. 11. Housing Element .............................................................................................................. 11.1 Introduction to the Element ...................................................................................................... 11.2 Housing Plan .............................................................................................................................. 11.3 Housing Needs Assessment ....................................................................................................... 11.4 Housing Constraints .................................................................................................................. 11.5 Housing Costs ............................................................................................................................. 11.6 Regional Housing Needs Assessment ....................................................................................... 11.7 Inventory of Adequate Housing Sites ....................................................................................... 11.8 Housing Programs 2006-2014 .................................................................................................. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit No. Page 1-1 Regional Location .................................................................................................................................. 10 1-2 Planning Area ......................................................................................................................................... 11 2-1 Existing 2007 Land Uses in Compton .................................................................................................. 22 2-2 Existing Residential Development in Compton .................................................................................. 24 2-3 Existing Commercial Development in Compton ................................................................................. 26 2-4 Existing Industrial Development in Compton ..................................................................................... 28 2-5 Location and Extent of Existing Public Uses in Compton .................................................................. 30 2-6 Existing Open Space Uses in Compton ................................................................................................ 32 2-7 Overview of Land Use Constraints ....................................................................................................... 35 2-8 Proposed Land Use Plan ........................................................................................................................41 3-1 Existing Roadways in Compton ............................................................................................................ 53 3-2 Levels of Service Definitions ................................................................................................................. 56 3-3 Roadway Levels of Service .................................................................................................................... 57 3-4 Roadway Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................................................... 59 3-5 Public Transit Facilities and Routes in Compton (2005) ................................................................... 64 3-6 Truck Routes in Compton (2009) ........................................................................................................ 67 3-7 Bike Paths
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I-710 Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact
    FINAL REPORT LOS ANGELES RIVER IMPACT REPORT WBS ID: 160.10.25, 165.10.60 & 165.10.63 INTERSTATE 710 CORRIDOR PROJECT Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority November 2011 Prepared by: 2020 East First Street, Suite 400 Santa Ana, California 92705 I-710 EIR / EIS – Los Angeles River Impact Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 2 2.1 Purpose Of This Report ............................................................................. 2 2.2 Report Background .................................................................................... 2 2.3 Project Introduction .................................................................................... 3 2.4 Project Alternatives .................................................................................... 6 2.4.1 Alternatives Description ........................................................................... 6 2.4.2 Alternative 1 – No Build Alternative ......................................................... 6 2.4.3 Alternative 5A – Freeway Widening up to 10 GP Lanes .......................... 6 2.4.4 Alternative 6A – 10 GP Lanes plus a Four-Lane Freight Corridor ............ 8 2.4.5 Alternative 6B – 10 GP Lanes plus a Zero-Emissions Four-Lane Freight Corridor ....................................................................................... 9 2.4.6 Alternative
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Caltrans Inventory of Pacific Electric Routes
    1981 Inventory of PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES I J..,. I ~ " HE 5428 . red by I58 ANGELES - DISTRICT 7 - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH rI P37 c.2 " ' archive 1981 INVENTORY OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES • PREPARED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DISTRICT 07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH FEBRUARY 1982 • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Pacific Electric Railway Company Map 3a Inventory Map 3b II. NQR'I'HIRN AND EASTERN DISTRICTS 4 A. San Bernardino Line 6 B. Monrovia-Glendora Line 14 C. Alhambra-San Gabriel Line 19 D. Pasadena Short Line 21 E. Pasadena Oak Knoll Line 23 F. Sierra Madre Line 25 G. South Pasadena Line 27 H. North Lake Avenue Line 30 10 North Fair Oaks Avenue Line 31 J. East Colorado Street Line 32 K. Pomona-Upland Line 34 L. San Bernardino-Riverside Line 36 M. Riverside-Corona Line 41 III. WESTERN DISTRICT 45 A. Glendale-Burbank Line 47 B. Hollywood Line Segment via Hill Street 52 C. South Hollywood-Sherman Line 55 D. Subway Hollywood Line 58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd. ) -PAGE III. WESTERN DISTRICT (Conta. ) E. San Fernando valley Line 61 F. Hollywood-Venice Line 68 o. Venice Short Line 71 H. Santa Monica via Sawtelle Line 76 I. westgate Line 80 J. Santa Monica Air Line 84 K. Soldier's Home Branch Line 93 L. Redondo Beach-Del Rey Line 96 M. Inglewood Line 102 IV. SOUTHIRN DISTRICT 106 A. Long Beach Line 108 B. American Avenue-North Long Beach Line 116 c. Newport-Balboa Line 118 D. E1 Segundo Line 123 E. San Pedro via Dominguez Line 129 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
    METRO UNION DIVISION BUS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS FACILITY PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION VOLUME II - APPENDICES LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AUGUST 2008 APPENDIX A Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT REPORT Metro Union Division Bus Maintenance and Operations Facility Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Prepared by Meyer, Mohaddes Associates 707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 4810 Los Angeles, CA 90017 August 20, 2008 J06-9001 Metro Union Division Bus Maintenance and Operations Facility - Traffic Impact Analysis Draft Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Existing Roadway Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Existing Transit Service ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Traffic Operations Analysis Methodology ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I-710 Corridor Project
    I-710 CORRIDOR PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA District 07-LA-710-PM 4.9/24.9 EA 249900 Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY June 2012 Prepared by: State of California Department of Transportation & Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 5 movement lanes. purpose lanes nexttofourseparated freight- Strategy consistingoftengeneral Locally Preferred 2005andidentifiedacommunity-based in March for transportation was completed improvements, possiblesolutions and safetyneedsto explore mobility undertaken theI-710Corridor’s toaddress 2005), I-710 MajorCorridorStudy(MCS;March wasbuiltinthe1950sand1960s).The freeway inneedofmodernization features (theoriginal volumes, highaccidentrates,andmanydesign particulate emissions,traffic congestion,hightruck tohighlevelsofdiesel of healthrisksrelated The existingI-710Corridorhaselevatedlevels and Vernon. inthecitiesofCommerce railyards (UP) Railroad Burlington Northern SantaFe(BNSF)/UnionPacific located atthesouthern terminus ofI-710andthe for goodsmovementbetweenPOLAandPOLB, serves astheprincipaltransportation connection theI-710 (StudyArea), StudyArea Corridor Project Beach tocentralLosAngeles.WithintheI-710 connectingthecityofLong interstate freeway I-710isamajornorth-southI-710 CorridorProject. toasthe isreferred project (SR-60). Theproposed County betweenOceanBlvd.andStateRoute60 inLosAngeles known astheLongBeachFreeway) Interstate710(I-710,also toimprove proposes toastheI-710FundingPartners), referred
    [Show full text]
  • Rancho San Pedro Reference Collection, 1902-2004
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3s20214f No online items RANCHO SAN PEDRO REFERENCE COLLECTION, 1902-2004 Finding aid prepared by Jennifer Allan Goldman California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives & Special Collections University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3895 URL: http://archives.csudh.edu/ ©2006 RANCHO SAN PEDRO REFERENCE Consult repository. 1 COLLECTION, 1902-2004 Descriptive Summary Title: Rancho San Pedro Reference Collection Dates: 1905-2004 Collection Number: Consult repository. Collector: California State University, Dominguez Hills Extent: 2 boxes(1 linear foot) Repository: California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections Archives & Special Collection University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3013 URL: http://archives.csudh.edu/ Abstract: This collection includes correspondence, brochures, newsclippings, papers, and copies of historical documents related to the Rancho San Pedro. Subjects include the Dominguez Adobe and Claretian Seminary, families descended from the Dominguez sisters, companies owned by these descendants, and the history of the Rancho San Pedro. Language: Collection material is in English Access There are no access restrictions on this collection. Publication Rights All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Director of Archives and Special Collections. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical materials and not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. Preferred Citation [Title of item], Rancho San Pedro Reference Collection, Courtesy of the Department of Archives and Special Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Compton Creek Ecosy
    AGN. NO._____ MOTION BY SUPERVISOR MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS JUNE 9, 2009 Home to more than 700,000 residents, the Compton Creek Watershed drains a highly urbanized 42.1 square miles of the Los Angeles River Watershed within the City of Los Angeles, the City of Compton and the unincorporated Willowbrook community. While a segment of the Creek has retained a natural river bottom, the majority of the waterway has been paved with concrete and the surrounding lands have been almost completely developed. As a result, recreational opportunities in the surrounding communities and along the Creek are limited, water quality is degraded, water conservation opportunities have not been realized and open space and natural resources, such as plant and wildlife, have been greatly reduced. For example, while minimum County standards for urban park space are four acres for every thousand persons, the Compton Creek watershed falls drastically below that standard with only 0.6 acres of park per one thousand persons. Furthermore, illegal dumping, blight, graffiti and non-point source pollution remains an ongoing policy challenge that adversely affect the surrounding community. - MORE - MOTION MOLINA __________________________ RIDLEY-THOMAS __________________________ YAROSLAVSKY __________________________ ANTONOVICH __________________________ KNABE __________________________ MOTION BY SUPERVISOR MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS JUNE 9, 2009 PAGE TWO The County Flood Control District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have expressed a concern that in the wake of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s mandated levee certification program, the Compton Creek levy system must be upgraded or an unmitigated flood risk to the lower reach of the Creek may arise.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5 Geology/Soils and Mineral Resources
    Draft EIR CHAPTER 4 Environmental Analysis August 2012 SECTION 4.5 Geology/Soils and Mineral Resources 4.5 GEOLOGY/SOILS AND MINERAL RESOURCES This section of the Draft EIR describes existing geology, soils, and mineral resources conditions for the San Pedro Community Plan Area (CPA) and analyzes how implementation of the proposed San Pedro Community Plan (proposed plan) could affect or be affected by geologic and soils conditions. No comment letters specifically addressing seismic, soils, or mineral resources were received in response to the Notice of Preparation (NOP) circulated for the proposed plan. Baseline information for the analysis was compiled from a review of geologic maps and reports prepared by the California Geological Survey (CGS) and Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), as well as information compiled and evaluated by the City of Los Angeles in conjunction with its overall planning and hazard mitigation processes to identify geologic conditions and geologic hazards in the CPA. Additional sources of information included the City of Los Angeles General Plan Framework, the City’s development ordinances, and environmental documents prepared for projects in the vicinity of the San Pedro CPA. Full reference-list entries for all cited materials are provided in Section 4.5.5 (References). A regulatory framework is also provided in this section describing applicable agencies and regulations related to geology/soils and mineral resources. 4.5.1 Environmental Setting Regional Geologic Setting The San Pedro CPA is located in the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province and within the Los Angeles Basin. The Peninsular Ranges are characterized by northwest-trending blocks of mountain ridges and sediment-floored valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey Report
    F.2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT FOR THE SAN PEDRO WATERFRONT PROJECT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Los Angeles Harbor Department Environmental Management Division 425 South Palos Verdes Street San Pedro, California 90733 Prepared by: ICF Jones & Stokes 811 West 7th Street, Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90017 213/627-5376 August 2008 Table of Contents SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 2 II. REGULATORY SETTING ................................................................................ 3 FEDERAL REGULATIONS ................................................................................ 3 STATE REGULATIONS ...................................................................................... 4 LOCAL REGULATIONS ..................................................................................... 6 III. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 7 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 7 PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SETTING .............................................................. 7 ETHNOGRAPHY ................................................................................................. 9 HISTORIC BACKGROUND .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Aquatic Life Use Needs for the Los Angeles River: Los Angeles River Environmental Flows Project
    CW Assessment of Aquatic Life SC RP Use Needs for the Los Angeles River E 9 s 6 tablished 19 Los Angeles River Environmental Flows Project Eric D. Stein Jordyn Wolfand Reza Abdi Katie Irving Victoria Hennon Kris Taniguchi-Quan Daniel Philippus Anna Tinoco Ashley Rust Elizabeth Gallo Colin Bell Terri S. Hogue SCCWRP Technical Report #1154 Assessment of Aquatic Life Use Needs for the Los Angeles River: Los Angeles River Environmental Flows Project Eric D. Stein1, Jordyn Wolfand2, Reza Abdi3, Katie Irving1, Victoria Hennon3, Kris Taniguchi-Quan1, Daniel Philippus3, Anna Tinoco2, Ashley Rust3, Elizabeth Gallo3, Colin Bell3, and Terri S. Hogue3 1Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA 2Shiley School of Engineering, University of Portland, Portland, OR 3Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO January 2021 SCCWRP Technical Report #1154 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The State Water Board, in coordination with City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, and Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, initiated the Los Angeles River Environmental Flows Project (Project) to provide a toolset to evaluate a series of flow reduction scenarios for the LA River. These tools will be used to inform development of flow criteria that sustain specific species, habitats, and beneficial uses. This toolkit may be used to develop policies on how to balance the need for local water supply and still support beneficial uses. In the near term, the outcomes of this analysis can inform decisions associated with proposed wastewater change petitions and stormwater management programs. In the longer term, the outcomes could inform decisions regarding the ability to support beneficial uses not currently supported, in combination with broader restoration planning efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • RANCHO SAN PEDRO COLLECTION, 1769-1972, Bulk 1900-1960
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt109nc51t No online items INVENTORY OF THE RANCHO SAN PEDRO COLLECTION, 1769-1972, bulk 1900-1960 Finding aid prepared by Thomas Philo. California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives & Special Collections University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3895 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html ©2006 INVENTORY OF THE RANCHO SAN Consult repository. 1 PEDRO COLLECTION, 1769-1972, bulk 1900-1960 Descriptive Summary Title: Rancho San Pedro Collection Dates: 1769-1972 Bulk: 1900-1960 Collection Number: Consult repository. Collector: California State University, Dominguez Hills Extent: 301 boxes, [155 linear ft.] Repository: California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections Archives & Special Collection University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3013 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html Abstract: This collection contains legal and business papers related to the Rancho San Pedro and to its owners, the Dominguez family. The Spanish crown gave the Southern California lands of the Rancho San Pedro to Juan Jose Dominguez in 1784, and in 1858 the United States government granted a patent confirming Dominguez family ownership of the Rancho. A few items predate the 1858 patent, but the bulk of the collection is from 1880-1960. Some materials concern the Rancho San Pedro itself, including partitions of land among family members, farming, oil and water development, and legal issues with neighboring cities, including Los Angeles and Long Beach. Much of the collection comprises records of the business, water, and real estate companies established by Dominguez heirs in and around the Los Angeles area.
    [Show full text]
  • Rent Control Ballot Initiative Efforts Continue for November Election
    1_Jan30_2018_issue_LBBJ 1/27/18 9:43 PM Page 1 January 30-February 12, 2018 Long Beach’s Newsmagazine www.lbbizjournal.com Inside This Issue Rent Control Ballot Initiative Efforts Hotel Work Continue For November Election Rules May I By BRANDON RICHARDSON Go To Voters SENIOR WRITER Petition To Collect n January 12, Housing Signatures Targets O Long Beach Executive The City Of Carson Is Director Josh Butler refiled a Properties With 50+ Rooms Celebrating Its 50th Anniversary petition to collect signatures to place a rent control ordinance on I By SAMANTHA MEHLINGER Stories Begin On Page 20 the November ballot. His initial ASSISTANT EDITOR filing, submitted to the city clerk late last year, was rejected be- ast year, the local hotel indus- cause it was incomplete. L try, particularly in Downtown “Corporate development is Long Beach, was under the spot- changing what our city looks like. light as union groups and labor ad- Rising rents are pricing out long- vocacy organizations pushed for time residents and forcing them two major hotels to unionize and for to leave,” Butler said in an e-mail stronger protections for workers. Shaun Lumachi Business to the Business Journal. “That's These issues came to a head Innovation Center Coming Soon why Long Beach families, renters when an ordinance that would have Page 6 in the community, local advocates established safety provisions and and small business owners are workload restrictions for hotel coming together to demand new workers was brought forth by four community-first policies that pro- councilmembers and rejected by the tect current residents.” remaining members of the council According to Long Beach in September.
    [Show full text]
  • A Longitudinal Temperature Profile of the Los Angeles River from June Through October 2016: Establishing a Baseline
    A LONGITUDINAL TEMPERATURE PROFILE OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER FROM JUNE THROUGH OCTOBER 2016: ESTABLISHING A BASELINE Prepared for: USC Sea Grant Program #10432541 and Trout Unlimited Prepared by: Jennifer Mongolo, Nina Trusso and Rosi Dagit Resource Conservation District of the Santa Monica Mountains 540 S. Topanga Canyon Blvd. Topanga, CA 90290 Andres Aguilar, Ph.D. Department of Biological Sciences California State University, Los Angeles 5151 State University Drive Los Angeles, CA 90032 Sabrina L. Drill, Ph.D. University of California Cooperative Extension 669 County Square Drive, Ventura, CA 93003 January 2017 i Abstract A pilot study to develop a longitudinal temperature profile of the Los Angeles River deployed continuously recording temperature loggers in 13 sites throughout the main stem and tributaries between June and October 2016. The river was divided into six zones based on channel conditions (soft bottom, concrete); main stem sites were distributed throughout all zones; and tributary sites were located just above their confluence with the main stem. Locations were selected to reflect representative conditions of water depth and canopy cover. Water temperature was recorded at 30 minute intervals, generating maximum, mean and minimum monthly and seasonal temperatures at each site. Seasonal maximum temperatures ranged between 21-34oC, mean temperatures between 18-26oC and minimum temperatures between 17- 25oC. No clear pattern of temperature from the headwaters to the ocean emerged, although diurnal differences between soft bottom and concrete channel reaches were observed. Overall, temperatures were too warm to support re-introduction of native fish species but currently support reproducing populations of several generalist non-native fish species dominated by tilapia and carp.
    [Show full text]