DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Use Plan 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Use Plan 2018 King Island Land Use Plan 2018 Draft for Consultation Foreword King Island is rich in so many ways - our natural beauty, our abundance of flora and fauna, our clean air, our clean water, our rich pastures, our plentiful ocean surrounds, our special history and the people that make up our supportive community. King Island’s “way of life”, while difficult to define, is unique and a web of values worthy of protecting at all levels. At this time, we have a once in a decade opportunity to set the framework and road map for our Island land use. Leveraging from what we have identified to protect and to encourage, this plan is about the future direction of what we do & build where. The deep engagement undertaken to get us to this point of sharing broadly with the community, has been invaluable in defining our values and objectives. This plan is the next step in seeking your input into defining our land use direction, with a view of sustainable development, appropriate infrastructure and a clear future direction for the Island’s land use. This Plan has been intelligently structured by our dedicated and committed team, with maximum information in a form that is easy to interpret. We are proud to present this to the community and look forward to the productive, constructive next steps with you. Duncan McFie Mayor King Island Council Table of Contents Summary 2 Our 20 Year Plan 8 Why Update? 10 Purpose 12 Developing Our Plan 14 Our Integrated Plan 16 Our Unique Island 22 King Island Land Use Strategy Plan 2008 27 Informing Our Strategies 28 Co-ordinated Decisions & Implementation 30 1 How to Read this Plan 32 Strategies 36 Our Resources 38 Settlement 40 Opportunity 42 Lifestyle Choices 44 2 Heritage 46 Policies 48 Rural & Coastal Area 50 Primary Industries 52 Biodiversity 60 Infrastructure 66 Vibrant Settlements 72 Housing Choice 86 Visitor Economy 98 Scenic Values 106 Natural Hazards 112 3 Heritage 118 Summary Integrated Plan Plan Objectives Coordinated The King Island Land Use Plan 2018 (The Decisions The Plan objectives are Provide opportunity for new economic investment supported by a Plan) was commissioned by the King Island focused on achieving the level of infrastructure provision that can respond to new demand for Council to create a road map for future use and King Island following outcomes. services. development on the Island aiming to: Land Use Plan Fostering population growth for an estimated additional 250 • inform zoning and amendments to the households, balanced with safeguarding our well-being, improving Core Values Planning Scheme; liveability, and providing lifestyle choices. • provide a basis for a coordinated approach to decision making and land use planning for the Continuing to build and diversify our economy in balance with Island; and protecting the unique attributes which retain and attract people to the Island. King Island Brand • signalling to the community and developers & Lifestyle of intended land use outcomes. King Island’s “way of life” is highly valued and Informed Plan King Island Lifestyle cannot be replicated elsewhere. The local strategies and policies were informed and The Island is highly regarded for its: developed from the following sources. • spectacular produce exported to many international destinations; Local Knowledge, Data & Analysis • world-rated golf courses in a scenically The Plan is informed by attractive coastal environment; Local Currie Lighthouse & Museum Council strategies, research Knowledge, Data & Analysis State Policies • RAMSAR wetlands and diversity of bird life papers, reports and available across the Island; spatial data. This has also drawn on the wealth of local • 7000 year old calcified forests; and knowledge. 2008 Plan Core Values • iconic Cape Wickham Lighthouse. 2008 Plan Ocean Dunes Golf Course These are some of the many attributes that The Plan builds on the King contribute to the local and regional economy but Island Strategy Plan Report State Government Policies also form part of the characteristics that define the (2008 Plan) completed in King Island lifestyle. March 2008. The Plan has regard to the Resource Management and Core Values The Plan is about facilitating use and development; The concepts and principles Planning System of Tasmania from the 2008 Plan (where and relevant strategies and ensuring infrastructure provision has capacity The core values are formed appropriate) are retained in policies such as the Cradle to respond to new demand, creating liveable from those embodied in Martha Lavinia Reserve the Plan to form the common Coast Regional Land Use settlements but also offering lifestyle opportunities; existing Council policies and thread between the two Strategy. The Plan is aligned and protecting important natural assets and the strategies with a focus on land plans. with State Government land resource base. use planning. policies. 1 Summary 2 Summary The Plan and the Planning Process Conservation Cape areas and Wickham reserves remain Tasmanian Cradle Coast King Island King Island & Ocean Dunes protected. Planning Regional Land Land Use Interim Planning identified as focal points System Use Strategy Plan 2018 Scheme for the visitor economy and large scale tourism Maximise the development. Economic retention of residual diversity encouraged at native vegetation Sets the Objec�ves of the Provides the land use planning More specific details relevant to Use and development controls are and areas of re-growth Planning System to be integrated outcomes desired specifically King Island. This is a higher developed from state, regional and Cape Wickham. across the State. The State Policies for the Cradle Coast Region. order document that provides local policy documents. across the Island. provide specific detailed guidance the local ra�onale for zoning Higher order documents not on desired land use planning and planning scheme decisions. considered in the day-to-day outcomes. assessment of planning permit applica�ons. Strategies & Policies The desired land use New outcomes for King Tasmanian Planning System Island are expressed CCRLUS commercial & through the strategies Core Values industrial activities Currie and policies. encouraged at the to continue to Airport & Huxley be the service centre Hill. These strategies and Strategies 1 of the Island. policies intended Our Resources 2 Se�lement to inform the 3 Opportunity Expansion of residential Planning Scheme 4 Lifestyle Choices areas focussed in and integrated into 5 Heritage Currie. the decision making The Ettrick is an area process. on the Island identified as suitable for coastal residential development. Policies The Agricultural Land Estate Next level of detail to (prime farm land on King Island) is reinforce desired outcomes identified on this map. of the Strategies Primary Industries is reliant on this land resource. Uses supporting primary industries given priority in this Grassy and area. Naracoopa provide opportunity for infill Land Use Planning Outcomes development. The strategies and policies contained in the Plan strive to achieve the stated objectives. The diagram of the Island Operation and function of provides a summary of the outcomes advocated for King the Grassy protected. Island in the Plan. 3 Summary 4 Summary Council is seeking your input and feedback on the Plan. While this Community & feedback is considered highly valuable, it is acknowledged that the Stakeholder community cannot influence all aspects of the Plan. Feedback The Plan will be on exhibition during the month of October and this will be available both in electronic copy (to download) and printed formats. There are other aspects of the Plan where there is scope to influence the policy setting. Here are some questions to consider when reviewing the Plan: “Has the best land for agriculture been identified on the Agricultural Land Estate (King Island’s prime land)?” “Are there areas in the Agricultural Land Estate that should not be used for processing raw products?” “Do you agree where future residential development is identified in Currie?” “Is ‘The Ettrick’ a suitable location for further coastal residential development?” “Are policies facilitating commercial development at the Huxley Hill and the Airport appropriate?” Comments on the Plan can be made in writing to the Council or through the “Have your Say” tab on Council’s website during the public consultation period. Next Steps When consultation has concluded, the comments and feedback received will be collated and considered. Where appropriate the Plan will be modified or adjusted to reflect the feedback and comments, as much as is possible. Following this process the next steps will be to refine the policy settings, outline implementation of the Plan and identify any specific actions for the short, medium and long term. This will identify planning scheme amendments required to integrate the local strategies and policies. 5 Summary 6 1 King Island Our 20 Year Plan King Island is renowned for its: spectacular food such as beef, seafood & cheese sourced and produced on the Island; the two world-rated golf courses at Ocean King Island Dunes & Cape Wickham; scenic rural and is in a period coastal landscapes; and biodiversity values and people that are proud of the Island’s of growth; achievements. large scale The protection of our many unique investments attributes and the natural environment are expected remains paramount for the Island’s prosperity and future. & population The King Island Land Use Plan (the Plan) is forecast to acknowledges our history, embraces our grow over the core values and builds a strong foundation for future use and development, placing next 3 years. the well-being of the Island’s people at the fore. Plan Provide opportunity for new economic investment supported by a level of infrastructure provision that can respond to new demand for Objectives services. Fostering population growth for an estimated additional 250 households, balanced with safeguarding our well-being, improving liveability, and providing lifestyle choices. Continuing to build and diversify our economy in balance with protecting the unique attributes which retain and attract people to the Island.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rock and Gravel Resources of King Island
    Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania Record 1998/05 Rock and gravel resources of King Island by C. R. Calver Summary The known gravel resources on King Island are limited. Material for road works is currently sourced from two pits (Reekara and Pearshape) operated by the King Island Council, and from a mine overburden waste dump at Grassy. Concrete aggregate is sourced from beach shingle on the west coast. The Reekara and Pearshape pits are known to have acid drainage problems. Mineral Resources Tasmania and the Department of Environment and Land Management have agreed that the Reekara pit should be closed immediately and rehabilitated, and that the Pearshape pit should be closed and rehabilitated within two years. Mining of the beach shingle, which is deleterious to the coastal environment, will also cease within two years. Thereafter concrete aggregate will need to be produced from hard rock. Future supplies of road construction gravel may continue to be sourced from the Grassy dump, from a new site at Counsel Hill, and from one or two other small existing pits. For good quality road sealing material and concrete aggregate, it is recommended that sites in Precambrian amphibolite east of Pegarah, and in Tertiary basalt in the north of the island, be investigated. INTRODUCTION rehabilitation of the Pearshape and Reekara pits in King Island’s supplies of gravel for road construction the near future. and concrete aggregate have, for many years, been A substitute or substitutes for these pits needs to be taken from beach shingle at widely scattered points capable of providing an annual total of around along the west coast of the island, and from two 40 000 tonnes of gravel and crushed stone for road inland gravel pits at Reekara in the north and construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • King Island Case Study Final Report
    1 ‘Where’s the Slice for King Island?’1 A case study of provenance protection models in King Island* By William van Caenegem2 and Kana Nakano3 1 Interview with Respondent 14: ‘You see the prices they’re charging in the shop fronts as double, but where is the slice for King Island? We’re getting the same slice as everyone else. How can we leverage that to come back to us?’ * This report could not have been completed without financial assistance for which we acknowledge the support of WTI Advisors and the European Union. However, this is an independent, scholarly study and the analysis and conclusions are entirely those of the authors. Ethics approval was obtained from the Bond University Human Research Ethics Committee for the conduct of interviews. 2 Professor of Law at Bond University. 3 Semester Teaching Fellow and Research Assistant at Bond University. 2 Executive Summary The findings in this case study are based on desktop research augmented with approximately thirty-two (32) interviews conducted on King Island, Australia, and few off-island actors. King Island (‘KI’) lies off the North coast of Tasmania and is part of that state. KI has an established reputation in Australia as a provenance brand for dairy and beef. KI lobster is marketed primarily in China. Australia does not allow for sui generis GI registration of any edible products other than wine. In that context, this case study examines how standard trade marks have become established in KI over time and perform a provenance branding function although they are owned by disparate commercial actors.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGES in SOUTHWESTERN TASMANIAN FIRE REGIMES SINCE the EARLY 1800S
    Papers and Proceedings o/the Royal Society o/Tasmania, Volume 132, 1998 IS CHANGES IN SOUTHWESTERN TASMANIAN FIRE REGIMES SINCE THE EARLY 1800s by Jon B. Marsden-Smedley (with five tables and one text-figure) MARSDEN-SMEDLEY, ].B., 1998 (31:xii): Changes in southwestern Tasmanian fire regimes since the early 1800s. Pap.Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 132: 15-29. ISSN 0040-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. There have been major changes in the fire regime of southwestern Tasmania over the past 170 years. The fire regime has changed from an Aboriginal fire regime of frequent low-intensity fires in buttongrass moorland (mostly in spring and autumn) with only the occasional high-intensity forest fire, to the early European fire regime of frequent high-intensity fires in all vegetation types, to a regime of low to medium intensity buttongrass moorland fires and finally to the current regime of few fires. These changes in the fire regime resulted in major impacts to the region's fire-sensitive vegetation types during the early European period, while the current low fire frequency across much of southwestern Tasmania has resulted in a large proportion of the region's fire-adapted buttongrass moorland being classified as old-growth. These extensive areas of old-growth buttongrass moorland mean that the potential for another large-scale ecologically damaging wildfire is high and, to avoid this, it would be better to re-introduce a regime oflow-intensity fires into the region. Key Words: fire regimes, fire management, southwestern Tasmania, Aboriginal fire, history.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 154, 2020 83 OVERVIEW OF TASMANIA’S OFFSHORE ISLANDS AND THEIR ROLE IN NATURE CONSERVATION by Sally L. Bryant and Stephen Harris (with one text-figure, two tables, eight plates and two appendices) Bryant, S.L. & Harris, S. 2020 (9:xii): Overview of Tasmania’s offshore islands and their role in nature conservation.Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 154: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.83 ISSN: 0080–4703. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia (SLB*); Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 (SH). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] Since the 1970s, knowledge of Tasmania’s offshore islands has expanded greatly due to an increase in systematic and regional surveys, the continuation of several long-term monitoring programs and the improved delivery of pest management and translocation programs. However, many islands remain data-poor especially for invertebrate fauna, and non-vascular flora, and information sources are dispersed across numerous platforms. While more than 90% of Tasmania’s offshore islands are statutory reserves, many are impacted by a range of disturbances, particularly invasive species with no decision-making framework in place to prioritise their management. This paper synthesises the significant contribution offshore islands make to Tasmania’s land-based natural assets and identifies gaps and deficiencies hampering their protection. A continuing focus on detailed gap-filling surveys aided by partnership restoration programs and collaborative national forums must be strengthened if we are to capitalise on the conservation benefits islands provide in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions and pressure for future use.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere Else on Earth
    Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values Environment Tasmania is a not-for-profit conservation council dedicated to the protection, conservation and rehabilitation of Tasmania’s natural environment. Australia’s youngest conservation council, Environment Tasmania was established in 2006 and is a peak body representing over 20 Tasmanian environment groups. Prepared for Environment Tasmania by Dr Karen Parsons of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Report citation: Parsons, K. E. (2011) Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values. Report for Environment Tasmania. Aquenal, Tasmania. ISBN: 978-0-646-56647-4 Graphic Design: onetonnegraphic www.onetonnegraphic.com.au Online: Visit the Environment Tasmania website at: www.et.org.au or Ocean Planet online at www.oceanplanet.org.au Partners: With thanks to the The Wilderness Society Inc for their financial support through the WildCountry Small Grants Program, and to NRM North and NRM South. Front Cover: Gorgonian fan with diver (Photograph: © Geoff Rollins). 2 Waterfall Bay cave (Photograph: © Jon Bryan). Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their assistance The majority of the photographs in the report were with the compilation of this report: Neville Barrett of the generously provided by Graham Edgar, while the following Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) at the additional contributors are also acknowledged: Neville University of Tasmania for providing information on key Barrett, Jane Elek, Sue Wragge, Chris Black, Jon Bryan, features of Tasmania’s marine
    [Show full text]
  • This Issue of Southern Caver Is Assumed to Be No. 52 ISSN 0157-8464
    This issue of Southern Caver is assumed to be No. 52 ISSN 0157-8464 SOUTHERN CAVER This index was compiled by Russell Fulton Typing: Nell Gill Published by the SOUTHERN CAVING SOCIETY Postal Address: P.O. Box 121, Moonah, Tasmania, 7009 Club Room 132 Davey Street, Hobart, 7000 OCTOBER 1985 1. INTRODUCTION This is an index to the contents of Southern Cavep published by the Southern Caving Society from Volume l'number 1 to Volume 12 number 4 and then in the new series numbers 49 to 51 inclusive. These were published between July 1967 and December 1982, a period spanning 15 years. The quarterly issue of the magazine ended with Volume 12 number 4 and it subsequently became an occasional publication commencing with number 49 (the magazines between Volume 1 and Volume 12 inclusive were counted as 48 issues). The Southern Caving Society was formed in April 1965 with the aim of furthering the exploration of Tasmanian caves and promoting their study and conservation. The Southern Cavep is an invaluable record of 15 years of Tasmanian speleology and the diversity of contributions to the magazine reflect a wide range of interests including for example, cave fauna, explora­ tion, diving in sea caves, snow cave geomorphology and underground photography. The list could go on. Copies of some of the issues are still available. For information on availability and cost, write to the Secretary, Southern Caving Society, P.O. Box 121, Moonah, Tasmania 7009. ARRANGEMENT OF THE INDEX There are 5 Sections A to E. These are: A. Tasmanian Caving Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA RELEASE NEWS from the UNIVERSITY of TASMANIA DATE: THURSDAY 15 NOVEMBER 2007 ATTENTION: Chiefs of Staff, News Directors
    MEDIA RELEASE NEWS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA DATE: THURSDAY 15 NOVEMBER 2007 ATTENTION: Chiefs of Staff, News Directors Lobster lotto to help in quest for big, red rock lobsters University of Tasmania researchers are asking people fishing for crays this summer to help in the quest for bigger, redder rock lobsters by reporting any tagged catches. Today is the opening of the commercial rock lobster season, and researchers from the University’s Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute (TAFI) in Taroona are hoping fishers will report catches of tagged rock lobsters on the new 2007 tagged lobster reporting card. “These tagged rock lobsters have been translocated from deeper waters, often in the south of Tasmania,” researcher Dr Bridget Green said. “We are in the third year of trialling the effect of moving rock lobsters from deeper to shallower water. “So far we know that it results in bigger, redder lobsters – and these are the ones of most value to the commercial fishery and most prized by recreational fishers. Survival of translocated lobsters is similar to resident lobsters.” People who catch tagged crays are asked to fill in details on the reporting card so researchers can track the changes in growth and survival of translocated lobsters. There is also an added incentive for fishers: “Every reported tag puts the fisher in the running for one of our prizes in bi-monthly tag lotto – cash, fishing or boating gear, or wine,” Dr Green said. The recreational rock lobster fishing season opened on November 3. Information Released by: The Media Office, University of Tasmania Phone: 6226 2124 Mobile: 0417 517 291 Email: [email protected] Fast facts on translocated rock lobsters Research Time Line: Trials in translocating rock lobsters began in 2005 in Tasmania, South Australia and Victoria, funded through the Fisheries Resource and Development Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Flinders Island Tasmania 20–30 March 2014
    Flinders Island Tasmania 20–30 March 2014 Bush Blitz Species Discovery Program Flinders Island, Tasmania 20–30 March 2014 What is Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a multi-million dollar partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Australia to document plants and animals in selected properties across Australia. This innovative partnership harnesses the expertise of many of Australia’s top scientists from museums, herbaria, universities, and other institutions and organisations across the country. Abbreviations ABRS Australian Biological Resources Study ANIC Australian National Insect Collection EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) TMAG Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery TSP Act Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (Tasmania) UNSW University of New South Wales Page 2 of 32 Flinders Island, Tasmania 20–30 March 2014 Summary From 20–30 March 2014, a Bush Blitz survey was conducted on Flinders Island in Bass Strait. The island has eight reserves, including Strzelecki National Park. Flinders Island is one of the remaining parts of the land bridge between the Australian mainland and Tasmania. This history, plus the wide range of habitats from mountains to open shrubland and coastal areas, means that the island is highly diverse. The Bush Blitz survey recorded 862 species, 643 of which had not been recorded previously for the reserves. Thirty-nine species that may be new to science were identified, including 33 invertebrate species (3 moths, 1 beetle, 6 true bugs and 23 spiders) and 6 lichen species. One moth and 10 plant species listed under Tasmania’s Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (TSP Act) were also collected.
    [Show full text]
  • GSBC Harbour Expansion and Maria Island Ferry Terminal Economic
    Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Economist & Financial Analysis Advisor 1 1.3 Submission Objectives 1 2. Economic Analysis 3 2.1 Economic Justification 3 2.2 Economic Costs 3 2.3 Economic Benefits (Merit Criterion 1) 3 2.4 Social Benefits (Merit Criterion 2) 4 2.5 Project Delivery (Merit Criterion 3) 4 2.6 Impact of Grant Funding (Merit Criterion 4) 5 3. Economic Results 7 3.1 Sensitivity Testing 7 Appendix A - Dr R.R. Noakes CV 15 Burbury Consulting Pty Ltd ACN 146 719 959 2/2 Gore Street, South Hobart, TAS 7004 P. 03 6223 8007 F. 03 6212 0642 [email protected] www.burburyconsulting.com.au Document Status Rev Approved for Issue Author Status No. Name Date 0 Dr. R. (Bob) Noakes For Approval J. Burbury 14/11/18 ii 1. Introduction 1.1 Background This Report has been prepared to present the findings of a range of economic and financial analyses, which have been completed for Spring Bay Harbour Expansion and Maria Island Ferry Terminal, Triabunna, Tasmania. The findings specifically relate to the preparation of an overall Business Case with two key investment components. These are to support and justify public sector investment in (i) a new public pier on the southern side of the existing pier relics and (ii) in the preservation of the existing historic pier remnants, for future heritage tourism and for Bridport’s historic legacy. Burbury Consulting has prepared the infrastructure drawings, project management plan and infrastructure costings. 1.2 Economist & Financial Analysis Project Advisor Dr Robert (Bob) Noakes is an experienced project/infrastructure economist and financial analyst with more than 40 years experience in Australia and in more than 30 countries in project planning and development studies, with major emphasis on ports, ferry terminals, roads and highways/bridge infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • King Island Catchments
    DEPARTMENT of PRIMARY INDUSTRIES, WATER and ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS for TASMANIAN SURFACE WATERS KING ISLAND September 2003 Proposed Environmental Management Goals 1 For Tasmanian Surface Waters: King Island Catchments Between late 2001 and 2003 Protected Words and expressions used in this Environmental Values (PEVS) were set final paper have, unless the contrary for King Island. A discussion paper intention appears, the same meaning as was prepared to facilitate public defined in the State Policy on Water participation in setting the PEVs. This Quality Management 1997 and the discussion paper was intended as a Environmental Management and basis for community and stakeholder Pollution Control Act 1994. Ecosystem participation in the process of refers to physical, chemical and developing environmental management biological aspects of the aquatic goals for the waterways that are environment. located within the King Island catchments. This final paper is divided into six main sections: The paper was prepared by the · The first part describes water Division of Environment Division in reforms in general. association with the Land and Water Management Branch, of the · The second part provides a brief Department of Primary Industries, the description of the King Island Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service catchments. Water and Environment and the King Island Council. · Part three discusses the State Policy on Water Quality Management. This paper has been modified into its current form to reflect that the process · The final Protected Environmental for the King Island catchments is now Values for the King Island complete. It is considered, however, catchments are shown in part four. that much of the information included · in the discussion paper should remain Water quantity values are discussed as a record of the PEV setting process.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Plan Artisan-1 Exploration Well Drilling
    Plan CDN/ID S4810AH717904 Environment Plan Artisan-1 Exploration Well Drilling Revision Date Reason for issue Reviewer/s Consolidator Approver 0 21/06/2019 Issued to NOPSEMA for public consultation GLE GLE GLE 0a 08/08/2019 Issued to NOPSEMA for assessment PW GLE MP Review due Review frequency Annually from date of 1 year/s THE THREE WHATS acceptance What can go wrong? For internal use and distribution only. Subject to employee could cause it to go wrong? confidentiality obligations. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled What document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy or issued What can I do to prevent it? under a transmittal. Environment Plan CDN/ID S4810AH717904 Table of contents 1 Overview of the Activity 12 1.1 Environment Plan Summary 12 2 Introduction 14 2.1 Background 15 2.2 Titleholder and liaison person details 15 3 Applicable Requirements 17 3.1 EPBC Act Requirements 17 3.2 Commonwealth guidance material 30 3.3 Industry codes of practice and guideline material 30 4 Description of the Activity 32 4.1 Activity location 32 4.2 Operational area 32 4.3 Activity timing 32 4.4 Field characteristics 32 4.5 Activities that have the potential to impact the environment 33 4.5.1 Well design and drilling methodology 33 4.5.2 MODU details and layout 37 4.5.3 Routine support operations 39 5 Description of the Environment 41 5.1 Regulatory context 41 5.2 Regional environmental setting 41 5.3 Summary of environmental receptors within the EMBA 42 6 Environmental Impact and Risk Assessment Methodology 52 6.1 Overview 52 6.1.1 Definitions
    [Show full text]