DOCSLIB.ORG

Election Observation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Election Observation Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 10 and 24 OCTOBER 1999 FINAL REPORT ODIHR ELECTION OBSERVATION Warsaw 20 January 2000 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Recommendations .................................................................................................................2 3 LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK........................................................ 4 3.1 The Electoral Law .................................................................................................................4 3.2 System of Representation ......................................................................................................4 The Senate (Upper House) .........................................................................................................4 The Majilis (Lower House) ........................................................................................................4 Party Lists and Proportional Representation ............................................................................5 Single Mandate Constituencies ..................................................................................................5 Maslikhat Elections....................................................................................................................6 3.3 Administrative Structure ......................................................................................................6 The Central Election Commission .............................................................................................6 Neutrality of Elections Commissions .........................................................................................6 Table of Election Commission Structure..............................................................................7 4. PRE-ELECTORAL PHASE .................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Political Party and Candidate Registration...........................................................................8 Candidates to the Single-Mandate Election Districts ................................................................8 Candidates to the Party List Ballot............................................................................................8 4.2 The Political Parties ..............................................................................................................8 Table of the Political Parties with Republican Standing......................................................10 The Case of the RNPK .............................................................................................................11 4.3 The Pre-Election Campaigns...............................................................................................11 4.4 Interference by Executive Authorities.................................................................................12 4.5 The Media Environment .....................................................................................................13 The Laws and Their Impact ....................................................................................................13 Administrative Obstacles.........................................................................................................13 Media Coverage of the Election Campaign .............................................................................14 4.6 The Senate Elections............................................................................................................15 Key Issues Exposed by the Senate Elections ............................................................................15 5 ELECTION DAY................................................................................................................ 15 5.1 Observations of the first round, 10 October ...........................................................................15 Presence of Observers..............................................................................................................15 Observation of Polling Activity................................................................................................16 Counting and Reporting of the Votes ......................................................................................17 The Collapse of Transparency and Accountability Mechanisms.............................................18 5.2 The Second Round, October 24...........................................................................................18 Observations in the Second Round ..........................................................................................19 Observations during Polling ....................................................................................................19 Analysis of Second Round Turnout .........................................................................................20 Table of Observed Voter Turnout, 2nd Round of Elections..................................................21 Analysis of the Second Round Voting Patterns .......................................................................21 Table of Results in Selected Districts, 2nd Round ...............................................................22 6 THE POST ELECTION PHASE.......................................................................................... 22 6.1 Election Appeals, Court Cases and CEC initiatives............................................................22 6.2 Opposition Reaction ............................................................................................................24 6.3 Government Reaction..........................................................................................................24 7 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS.................................................................................................. 25 7.1 Results of Elections Based on the Party List .......................................................................25 Table of Nationwide Party List Results..............................................................................26 7.2 Results from the First Round Single Mandate Races..........................................................27 7.3 Results for the Second Round, October 24..........................................................................27 7.4 Final Results.............................................................................................................................28 Table of Political Make up of the Majilis...........................................................................28 Profile of Elected Members of the Majilis..........................................................................28 ANNEXES ...................................................................................................................................... 30 ANNEX 1 – ANALYSIS OF MEDIA COVERAGE ................................................................................. 30 Chart of Media Coverage of Election Issues ......................................................................31 Distribution of Time between Political Parties – State Television .......................................32 Distribution of Time between Political Parties – Privately-owned Television......................33 Table of Press Coverage by Political Party.........................................................................34 ANNEX 2 - ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF THE SENATE ELECTION ........................................................ 35 Summary of Candidates and Results..................................................................................35 Republic of Kazakhstan Parliamentary Elections 10 and 24 October 1999 OSCE/ODIHR Final Report 20 January 2000 1. INTRODUCTION Based on an invitation issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan to take part in observing the parliamentary (Majilis) elections scheduled for 10 October 1999, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) established an Election Observation Mission (EOM) on 1 September 1999, with observers seconded by participating States. The OSCE/ODIHR appointed Ms. Linda Edgeworth as Head of the long-term Election Observation Mission. Mr. Ihor Ostash, Vice-President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly and Member of the Ukrainian Parliament, was appointed to lead the short-term observers as Special Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office. This final report is based on the findings of the EOM for both the first round of elections on 10 October, the second round held on 24 October, and relevant events immediately thereafter. The EOM included 20 core staff and long-term observers, and 118 short-term observers, including 18 members of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly. The number of observers was reduced during the second round. They visited 547 polling stations during the first round, and 134 polling stations during the second round. Preliminary statements on the two rounds of elections were issued on 11 and 25 October, respectively. The OSCE/ODIHR wishes to thank the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Central Election
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A/HRC/13/23/Add.1 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/13/23/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 February 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, including the Right to Development Report of the independent expert on minority issues Addendum Mission to Kazakhstan* ** (6 to 15 July 2009) Summary Kazakhstan has approximately 130 different ethnic groups, many of which have lived on the territory of Kazakhstan for generations. Initiatives taken by the Government in the field of minority issues have undoubtedly helped to ensure stability and respect for diversity and minority rights. These initiatives have included important policies to help preserve minority languages, establish and fund cultural associations for the preservation of ethnic cultures and traditions and the establishment of consultative bodies, the most prominent of which is the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan. The Assembly of the People, which plays a consultative or advisory role to the President, is a valuable national symbol of the recognition of minorities and the commitment of the State to the preservation of the cultural heritage of minorities. Nine seats in the lower house of Parliament are reserved for members chosen from the Assembly. However, the Assembly lacks the character of a legitimately representative body. Its membership is not constituted on a fully democratic basis and members are not, therefore, clearly accountable to their minority communities. * Late submission. ** The summary of the present report is being circulated in all official languages. The report itself, contained in the annex to the summary, is being circulated in the language of submission and in Russian only.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Approval Form Nazarbayev University School of Sciences and Humanities
    THESIS APPROVAL FORM NAZARBAYEV UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES NATION BRANDING: AN INSTRUMENT OF SOFT POWER OR NATION-BUILDING? THE CASE OF KAZAKHSTAN ҰЛТТЫҚ БРЕНДИНГ: ЖҰМСАҚ ҚУАТ НЕ ҰЛТ-ҚҰРЫЛЫС ҚҰРЫЛҒЫСЫ? ҚАЗАҚСТАН ҮЛГІСІ НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ БРЕНДИНГ: ИНСТРУМЕНТ МЯГКОЙ СИЛЫ ИЛИ НАЦИОНАЛЬНОЕ СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВО? ПРИМЕР КАЗАХСТАНА BY Leila Ramankulova APPROVED BY DR. Neil Collins ON 3rd May of 2020 _________________________________________ Signature of Principal Thesis Adviser In Agreement with Thesis Advisory Committee Second Reader: Dr. Spencer L Willardson External Reviewer: Dr. Phil Harris NATION BRANDING: AN INSTRUMENT OF SOFT POWER OR NATION-BUILDING? THE CASE OF KAZAKHSTAN ҰЛТТЫҚ БРЕНДИНГ: ЖҰМСАҚ ҚУАТ НЕ ҰЛТ-ҚҰРЫЛЫС ҚҰРЫЛҒЫСЫ? ҚАЗАҚСТАН ҮЛГІСІ НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ БРЕНДИНГ: ИНСТРУМЕНТ МЯГКОЙ СИЛЫ ИЛИ НАЦИОНАЛЬНОЕ СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВО? ПРИМЕР КАЗАХСТАНА by Leila Ramankulova A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science and International Relations at NAZARBAYEV UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 2020 © 2020 LEILA RAMANKULOVA All Rights Reserved NATION BRANDING: AN INSTRUMENT OF SOFT POWER OR NATION-BUILDING? THE CASE OF KAZAKHSTAN ҰЛТТЫҚ БРЕНДИНГ: ЖҰМСАҚ ҚУАТ НЕ ҰЛТ-ҚҰРЫЛЫС ҚҰРЫЛҒЫСЫ? ҚАЗАҚСТАН ҮЛГІСІ НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ БРЕНДИНГ: ИНСТРУМЕНТ МЯГКОЙ СИЛЫ ИЛИ НАЦИОНАЛЬНОЕ СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВО? ПРИМЕР КАЗАХСТАНА by Leila Ramankulova Principal Adviser: Dr. Neil Collins Second Reader: Dr. Spencer L Willardson External Reviewer: Dr. Phil Harris Electronic Version Approved: Dr. Caress Schenk Director of the MA Program in Political Science and International Relations School of Humanities and Social Sciences Nazarbayev University May 2020 v Abstract Nation branding is a process by which countries seek to create an attractive image and manipulate its external perception. The process of branding a nation involves a broad array of activities from an advertisement on TV and journals to much more extensive public diplomacy initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Policy Responses Containment a 30-Day State of Emergency from March 16, and Extended to End of April.1 [27 April] Extended to May 11.2
    Last update:4 November 2020 Kazakhstan Policy responses Containment A 30-day state of emergency from March 16, and extended to end of April.1 [27 April] Extended to May 11.2 Nur-Sultan and Almaty are under quarantine, a stay-at-home order have been in place since March 28, and all non-essential businesses remain closed. Other large cities are also moving to quarantine with bans on entry/exit and social distancing measures. Use drones to patrol capital city during COVID-19 lockdown.3 Mass testing for doctors, announced on 16 April.4 [21 April] starting from April 20 Nur-Sultan and Almaty eased quarantine regulations, reopened manufacturing facilities, construction industry and some services.5 [5 May] State of emergency State of emergency will be lifted on May 11 if situation doesn’t change for worse.6 [11 May] Quarantine restrictions are gradually lifted.7 [11 May] Passengers of the domestic flights in Kazakhstan no longer have to provide a certificate of a PCR-based test for coronavirus with a negative result before boarding, said Kazakh Chief State Sanitary Doctor on Transport Sadvakas Baigabulov.8 [24 May] Kazakhstan to impose two-day quarantine on arrivals.9 [26 May] Kazakhstan announced that wearing face masks in public places obligatory.10 1 https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/kazakhstan-to-extend-coronavirus-state-of-emergency-to-end-of-april- 624266. 2 https://www.timesca.com/index.php/news/22405-kazakhstan-extends-state-of-emergency-over-covid-19- uzbekistan-reopens-some-businesses. 3 https://www.terra-drone.net/global/2020/04/09/kazakhstan-drones-patrol-coronavirus-covid-19-lockdown/.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Law and Policy in Kazakhstan 2016
    2016 Конкурентное право и политика вКазахстане иполитика право Конкурентное Конкурентное право и политика в Казахстане Экспертный обзор A Peer Review Peer A and Policy in Kazakhstan in Policy and Competition Law Competition Competition Law and Policy in Kazakhstan 2016 COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY IN KAZAKHSTAN A Peer Review -- 2016 -- ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT About the OECD The OECD is a forum in which governments compare and exchange policy experiences, identify good practices in light of emerging challenges, and promote decisions and recommendations to produce better policies for better lives. The OECD’s mission is to promote policies that improve economic and social well-being of people around the world. Find out more at www.oecd.org. This report is published on the responsibility of the Secretary- General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. The OECD has two official languages: English and French. The English version of this report is the only official one. © OECD 2016 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESENT SITUATION of KAZAKH-MONGOLIAN COMMUNITY Ts.Baatar, Ph.D
    The Mongolian Journal of International Affairs Number 8-9, 2002 PRESENT SITUATION OF KAZAKH-MONGOLIAN COMMUNITY Ts.Baatar, Ph.D (Mongolia) The name and identity “kazakh” emerged in the sixteenth century, when a Kazakh Khanate was founded in today’s Kazakhstan. The Kazakh aristocrats trace their origin directly to Chinggis Khan or his sons. In the sixteenth century, ethnic Kazakhs were historically divided into three clans or zhuzes: The senior zhuz, the middle zhuz, and the junior zhuz. Once under the rule of the Oirad Mongols in the seventeenth to eighteen centuries, some middle zhuz Kazakhs later moved into Jungaria. The Kazakhs in Mongolia are mostly Abak-kerei and Naiman Kazakhs who settled in the Altai and Khovd regions, where they rented pasture from the lords of Mongolia during the 1860s according to Tarbagatai Protokol between Russia and Qing Dynasty. The nomads came to graze their sheep on the high mountain pastures during the summer, and spent the winter in Kazakhstan or Xinjiang province in China. After the Mongolian revolution in 1921, a permanent border was drawn by agreement between China, Russia and Mongolia, but the Kazakhs remained nomadic until the 1930s, crossing the border at their own will.1 The word kazakh is said to mean ‘free warrior’ or ‘steppe roamer’. Kazakhs trace their roots to the fifteenth century, when rebellious kinsmen of an Uzbek Khan broke away and settled in present-day Kazakhstan. In Mongolia, more than in Kazakhstan, Kazakh women wear long dresses with stand-up collars, or brightly decorated velvet waistcoats and heavy jewelry. The men still wear baggy shirts and trousers, sleeveless jackets, wool or cotton robes, and a skullcap or a high, tasseled felt hat.2 In 1923 the Mongolian Kazakh population numbered 1,870 households and 11,220 people.3 Subsequently, many more have come to Mongolia from 3 Paul Greenway, Robert Story and Gobriel Lafitte (1997), Mongolia (Lonely Planet Publications), p.231.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Systematic Country Diagnostic
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 125611-KZ A new growth model for building a secure middle class Kazakhstan Systematic Country Diagnostic April 2018 Contents Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................... viii Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................... x 1. Setting the stage: Poverty, shared prosperity, and jobs in a changing economic context .................. 1 1.1 Trends in poverty reduction and shared prosperity ........................................................................... 4 1.2 Jobs, earnings, and productivity ........................................................................................................ 13 1.3 Looking ahead—four mutually reinforcing strategic pillars for building a secure middle class ....... 18 2. Strategic Pillar 1: Economic management for diversification ......................................................... 21 2.1 Understanding the components of economic growth in Kazakhstan ............................................... 21 2.2 Fiscal and monetary policy during commodity cycles ....................................................................... 26 2.3 Governance and public sector effectiveness ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Facade Democracy: Democratic Transition in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2004 Facade Democracy: Democratic Transition In Kazakhstan And Uzbekistan Robin Nicole Merritt University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Merritt, Robin Nicole, "Facade Democracy: Democratic Transition In Kazakhstan And Uzbekistan" (2004). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 143. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/143 FAÇADE DEMOCRACY: DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION IN KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN by ROBIN NICOLE MERRITT B.A. University of Central Florida, 1999 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2004 © 2004 Robin Nicole Merritt ii ABSTRACT This thesis explores the reasons behind the stagnation in the transition to democracy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. According to their constitutions, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are democracies. In actuality, however, there is little evidence to support that these are democratic systems. These states’ post-Soviet constitutions outline them as democracies – yet they lack a free press; freedom of association is suppressed; religious freedom is limited; and free speech is constrained as well. While these two countries hold popular elections, much of their electoral processes are under the control of the executive branch of government - calling into question whether or not Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan really hold “fair and competitive” elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Hakemli Makale
    KİTAP ÖZETİ/BOOK REVIEW THE HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW OF KAZAKHSTAN By Zhamaladen.I. Ibragimov; Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, L.N Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, 2009. ISBN 9965- 31-086-6. Seitova AIGERIM In generally, book gives information about the development of Kazakh law in different periods of history which is related with political, historical situations. The content of book consist of nine chapters. The proposed book about the History of state and law of the Republic of Kazakhstan includes basic information about the first state structures and legal systems which were formed on the territory of Kazakhstan, the political and legal structure of the Kazakh khanate, the political and legal development of Kazakhstan as part of the Russian Empire, the formation and development of the state and legal system in Soviet Kazakhstan and the formation of state and legal structure of independent Kazakhstan. As above mentioned, aссording to the content of book, the history of law and state of Kazakstan is divided for four terms. Firstly, at the beginning of book, the author answer to questions about how the first states are appeared in the territory of Kazakhstan. In the first Millennium BC the territory of Kazakhstan was inhabited by Sak-Scythian tribes. They were called "Scythian" from the Greek Scriptures, and “Scythian” from the Persian Scriptures. Scythian tribes were divided into several associations, formed the first state and their Yayın Kuruluna Ulaştığı Tarih: 02.12.2019 Kabul Edildiği Tarih: 17.12.2019 Mevlana Değişim Programı Öğrencisi. E-Mail: [email protected] ORCID-ID: 0000-0002-9145-3659 SDÜHFD VOL: 9, NO 2, YEAR 2019 430 Seitova AIGERIM characteristic legal systems1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Kazakhstan
    The Republic of Kazakhstan Inception report on Targeted Social Assistance Scheme Decent Work: Integrated Approach to Social Sphere in Kazakhstan Bilateral Project for Technical Cooperation International Labour Office (ILO) - Subregional office for Eastern Europe and Central Asia - UNDP Country Office in the Republic of Kazakhstan Currency Equivalents (as of 3 June 2003) Currency Unit : Tenge USD 1 = 151.2 Tenge Abbreviations ADB - Asian Development Bank EUROSTAT - Statistical Office of the European Communities HBS - Household Budgetary Survey ID - Individual Database ILO - International Labour Office KILM - Key Indicators of the Labour Market LED - Local Economic Development LFS - Labour Force Survey MOLSP - Ministry of Labour and Social Protection NGO - Non-Governmental Organization OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PAYG - Pay-as-you-go PHS - Poor Households Survey SIF - Social Insurance Fund SSD - Social Security-related Database SPPC - State Pension Payment Centre TSA - Targeted Social Assistance TA - Technical Assistance UNDP - United Nations Development Programme WB - World Bank Table of contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Background information 2 1.1. The social safety net system – social benefits and social assistance 2 1.2. The Targeted Social Assistance (TSA) scheme in Kazakhstan 2 1.2.1. Characteristics of Targeted Social Assistance 2 1.2.2. Defining eligibility to receive TSA 4 1.2.3. Measures to combat poverty 5 1.3. Social security benefits in Kazakhstan 6 1.3.1. Retirement pension scheme 6 1.3.2. Other social security benefits 7 Chapter 2 Findings of the UNDP/ILO joint mission 8 2.1. TSA-related findings during mission 8 2.1.1. Data collection and availability 8 2.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Name of Unity
    The Equal Rights Trust is an independent internation- al organisation whose purpose is to combat discrimi- nation and promote equality as a fundamental human Equal Rights Trust right and a basic principle of social justice. The Kazakhstan International Bureau for Human Rights and Rule of Law is a non-governmental organi- sation which aims to protect political rights and civ- il freedoms and to develop democracy and rule of law in Kazakhstan and other countries. “Unity! Stability! Creativity!” This is the slogan of Nur Otan, the political party of Nursultan Nazarbayev, the Republic of Kazakhstan’s first and only president. ▪ This report, examining discrimination and inequality in Kazakhstan, finds Series: Kazakhstan Report Country that the unity promoted by Nazarbayev is narrow, excluding those whose religion, ethnicity or political opinion challenges his vision, and denying an equal role to women, persons with disabilities and other groups. - IN THE NAME ofA 2011the Kazakh law on language religion imposes– spoken onerous by only registration74% of the population requirements, – creates indi rectly discriminating against minority religious groups. The promotion OF UNITY - barriers for ethnic minorities in accessing public services, employment and education. The state discriminates on the basis of political opinion, detain ing its critics and limiting freedom of expression, assembly and association.- Addressing Discrimination The unified Kazakhstan promoted by the government also provides lit and Inequality in Kazakhstan tle space for other groups. Women are subject to discriminatory laws and are underrepresented in the workforce and public life. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons are subject to discrimination by both state and non-state actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to External Shocks Hitting the Economy of Кazakhstan
    ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REGIONAL-CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (R- CDTA) STRENGTHENING KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL AND WEST ASIA RESPONDING TO EXTERNAL SHOCKS HITTING THE ECONOMY OF КAZAKHSTAN 3 March 2017 This report has been prepared under the Region-wide Study, “Good Jobs for Inclusive Growth in Central and West Asia.” The study is undertaken under R- CDTA-8936, “Strengthening Knowledge Management in Central and West Asia.” This report has been prepared by study consultant Olzhas Khudaibergenov. The overall Study task manager is Giovanni Capannelli, Country Director, KARM, ADB. Contents List of acronyms ...................................................................................................................... ii 1.Introduction and Background .............................................................................................. iii 2.The impact of external macroeconomic shocks on the economy of Kazakhstan ................. 3 3. Policy Response ................................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Monetary Policy ........................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Fiscal Policy ................................................................................................................. 17 3.3 Structural Policies ........................................................................................................ 29 4. Operational support from ADB and other IFIs ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Mobilization Information Digest N 71 March 2013
    o Resource Mobilization Information Digest N 71 March 2013 Sectoral Integration in Kazakhstan Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Biotechnology ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Agriculture................................................................................................................................................. 3 4. Water ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 5. State forest fund ....................................................................................................................................... 5 6. Hunting ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 7. Fisheries .................................................................................................................................................... 7 8. Forestry ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 9. Nature reserve fund ................................................................................................................................ 11 10. International
    [Show full text]