DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Imprinting As an Effective Way of Soil Surface Manipulation to Revegetate Arid Lands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Imprinting As an Effective Way of Soil Surface Manipulation to Revegetate Arid Lands Land imprinting as an effective way of soil surface manipulation to revegetate arid lands Item Type Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Abusuwar, Awad Osman Mohmed,1952- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 11:10:49 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191107 LAND IMPRINTING AS AN EFFECTIVE WAY OF SOIL SURFACE MANIPULATION TO REVEGETATE ARID LANDS by Awad Osman Mohmed Abusuwar A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN AGRONOMY AND PLANT GENETICS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1986 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Final Examination Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Awad Osman Mohmed Abusuwar entitled Land imprinting as an effective way of soil surface manipulation to revegetate arid lands and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement Doctor of Philosophy • ItTr; Date Date Date Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copy of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. A-erti g6: Dis ertation Director Date STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to bor- rowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or re- production of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED C ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express sincere thanks to his major ad- visor, Dr. M. H. Schonhorst, and to his minor advisor, Dr. R. M. Dixon, for their support, patience, and expert guidance during the course of this study. Grateful appreciation is extended to the members of the committee, which included Dr. R. E. Briggs, Dr. R. E. Dennis, and Dr. V. Marcarian, for their valuable suggestions during the course of the study and for reviewing this manuscript. Special thanks are ex- tended to Dr. P. G. Bartels who served on my committee as a substitute both during the preliminary examinations and the final oral examination. Appreciation and respect are due to my family for their encour- agement and support, and to my loving wife, Samia, for her patience, sacrifice, and support without which this study could not have been completed. The presence of my fifteen-month-old daughter, Areij, encouraged me and gave me the motivation to continue. The Government of the Sudan paid my expenses for transportation, tuition, books, food, lodging, and other costs. This assistance made my studies at the University of Arizona possible, and for this I will always be grateful. Thanks are extended to Mr. Paul Johnson of the Statistical Consulting Unit, who helped with the analysis of this study, and to Ms. Anna McKew who typed the thesis. iv A debt of gratitude is due to all who helped in any way to make this dissertation possible. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ABSTRACT xi 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 7 Land Shaping and Types of Seedbeds 7 Soil Mulching 9 Artificial Revegetation 11 Competition 12 Adapted Species and Suitable Planting Tools 13 Grass-Legume Mixture 16 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 20 Treatments 21 Parameters Measured 26 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 30 Meteorological Data 30 Soil Moisture 32 Plant Population 46 Physiological Data (Legumes) 52 Transpiration 52 Leaf Diffusive Resistance 55 Plant Height (Grass) 60 Canopy Cover 63 Biomass 66 Individual Harvests 66 Overall Means of the Different Cutting Dates 78 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 82 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS--Continued Page APPENDIX A: EFFECTS OF TREATMENTS ON PLANT HEIGHT AT THE ORACLE AGRICULTURAL CENTER FOR THE DIFFERENT SAMPLING DATES 85 APPENDIX B: EFFECTS OF TREATMENTS ON PLANT HEIGHT AT THE CAMPUS AGRICULTURAL CENTER FOR THE DIFFERENT SAMPLING DATES 90 APPENDIX C: EFFECTS OF TREATMENTS ON PERCENT CANOPY COVER AT THE ORACLE AGRICULTURAL CENTER FOR THE DIFFERENT SAMPLING DATES 97 APPENDIX D: EFFECTS OF TREATMENTS ON PERCENT CANOPY COVER AT THE CAMPUS AGRICULTURAL CENTER FOR THE DIFFERENT SAMPLING DATES 102 LITERATURE CITED 109 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Monthly average temperature (C) at the Oracle and Campus Agricultural Centers 33 2. Monthly average relative humidity (%) at the Oracle and Campus Agricultural Centers 34 3. Effects of treatments on percent soil moisture at the Oracle Agricultural Center 37 4. Effects of treatments on the percent soil moisture at the Campus Agricultural Center 38 -2 -1, 5. Effects of treatments on transpiration rates (11.g cm s ) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (Overall means of 8 sampling dates 53 -2 -1, 6. Effects of treatments on transpiration rates (11g cm s ) at the Campus Agricultural Center (overall means of 8 sampling dates) 54 7. Effects of treatments on leaf diffusive resistance (S cm) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (overall means of 8 sampling dates) 56 -1 8. Effects of treatments on leaf diffusive resistance (S cm ) at the Campus Agricultural Center (overall means of 8 sampling dates) .57 9. Effects of treatments on leaf temperature (C) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (overall means of 8 sampling dates) 58 10. Effects of treatments on leaf temperature (C) at the Campus Agricultural Center (overall means of 8 sampling dates) 59 11. Effects of treatments on grass height (cm) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (overall means of 4 sampling dates) . 61 12. Effects of treatments on grass height (cm) at the Campus Agricultural Center (overall means of 6 sampling dates) 62 vii viii LIST OF TABLES--Continued Table Page 13. Effects of treatments on percent canopy cover at the Oracle Agricultural Center (overall means of 4 sampling dates) 64 14. Effects of treatments on percent canopy cover at the Campus Agricultural Center (overall means of 6 sampling dates) 65 15. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ ha) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (First harvest on 9/29/84) 67 16. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (Second harvest on 5/25/85) 68 17. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (Third harvest on 8/5/85) 69 18. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (Fourth harvest on 10/12/85) 70 19. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Campus Agricultural Center (First harvest on 5/15/84) 71 20. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Campus Agricultural Center (Second harvest on 6/28/84) 72 21. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Campus Agricultural Center (Third harvest on 8/20/84) 73 22. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Campus Agricultural Center (Fourth harvest on 10/24/84) 74 23. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Campus Agricultural Center (Fifth harvest on 5/22/85) 75 ix LIST OF TABLES—Continued Table Page 24. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Campus Agricultural Center (Sixth harvest on 8/5/85) 76 25. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Oracle Agricultural Center (overall means of 4 harvesting dates) 80 26. Effects of treatments on forage dry matter production (kg/ha) at the Campus Agricultural Center (overall means of 6 harvesting dates) 81 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. The imprintation pattern of land imprinter . 4 2. The hand imprinter 22 3. The land imprinter 23 4. Precipitation at the Campus and Oracle Agricultural Centers: Long term average vs. study period average . 31 5. Neutron probe calibration curves for the Oracle and Campus Agricultural Centers 35 6. Response surface plots showing the effects of surface treatments on soil moisture at the Oracle Agricultural Center 41 7. Response surface plots showing the effects of surface treatments on soil moisture at the Campus Agricultural Center 42 8. Response surface plots showing the effects of cover treatments on soil moisture at the Oracle Agricultural Center 43 9. Response surface plots showing the effects of cover treatments on soil moisture at the Campus Agricultural Center 44 10. Plant population count at the Oracle Agricultural Center (Pilot Study) 47 11. Plant population count at the Oracle Agricultural Center (Second Study) 49 12. Plant population count at the Campus Agricultural Center 51 X ABSTRACT Research was conducted over a 2-year period at the University of Arizona Campus and Oracle Agricultural Centers to evaluate the ef- fectiveness of surface imprintation in revegetating arid lands. Introduction of forage leguminous species into arid rangelands through land imprintat ion was another objective of this study.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildland Shrub and Arid Land Restoration Symposium
    United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings: Forest Service Intermountain Wildland Shrub and Research Station General Technical Report INT-GTR-315 Arid Land Restoration April 1995 Symposium SHRUB RESEARCH CONSORTIUM USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory*, Provo, Utah, E. Durant McArthur (Chairman); Brigham Young University*, Provo, Utah, Daniel J. Fairbanks; USDA Agricultural Research Service, Renewable Resource Center*, Reno, Nevada, James A. Young; Utah State University*, Logan, Frederick D. Provenza; State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources*, Salt Lake City, David K. Mann; University of California, Los Angeles, Philip W. Rundel; Colorado State University, Fort Collins, William K. Lauenroth; University of Idaho, Moscow, Steven J. Brunsfeld; University of Montana, Missoula, Don Bedunah; Montana State University, Bozeman, Carl L. Wambolt; University of Nevada-Reno, Paul T. Tueller; University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Stanley D. Smith; Oregon State University, Corvallis, Lee E. Eddleman; New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, Kelly W. Allred; Texas A & M System, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, San Angelo, Darrell N. Ueckert; Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Ronald E. Sosebee; USDA Agricultural Research Service, High Plains Grassland Research Station, Cheyenne, D. Terrance Booth; USDA Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Jerry R. Barrow; USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Renewable Resource Center, Reno, Nevada, Robin J. Tausch; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, James R. Ehleringer; Weber State University, Ogden, Utah, Cyrus M. McKell; Washington State University, Pullman, Benjamin A. Zanora; University of Wyoming, Laramie, Rollin H. Abernethy; Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington, Steven O. Link; E G & G Energy Measurements, Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of the United States Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration, Western Region
    Reprinted from the Proceedings of the Symposium on WATERSHED MANAGEMENT '80 ASCEIBoise, ID/July 21-23, 1980 LAND IMPRINTING FOR BETTER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT3 By Robert M. Dixon and J. Roger Simanton ABSTRACT We are developing a unique conservation plow for imprinting land surfaces with complex geometric patterns designed to increase and stabi lize land productivity through improved control over rainwater infiltra tion. Worldwide overgrazing of pasture and rangelands and excessive tillage of croplands decrease rainwater infiltration and increase runoff and erosion, thereby triggering a vicious circle of land deterioration or desertification. To reverse this cycle of increasing land barrenness and aridity, the land imprinter forms rainwater-irrigated seedbeds and seedling cradles which help to ensure successful crop seed germination, seedling growth, and vegetative cover establishment. Thus, the tempora ry control of infiltration, runoff, and erosion provided by the land imprinter favors revegetation and relatively permanent biological con trol of these processes. INTRODUCTION Vast barren land areas, particularly in semiarid and arid regions of the world, need to be revegetated for protection against erosion and for efficient use of soil and water resources in the production of food, feed, and fiber. Historically, cropland tillage implements have been modified and redesigned in an attempt to revegetate such land areas. The resulting implements are referred to in the literature as the eccen tric disc pitters (14), brushland disc plows (12), root plows (1), mold- board plows (10), land rippers (8), land furrowers (11), and brush cut ters and shredders. The seedbed that is produced by any one of the preceding implements is usually not good enough to insure vegetative establishment in arid and semiarid regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tillage Systems for Soil and Water Conservation. FAO Soils Bulletin No
    Tillage systems i for soil and water conservation F000 ANO AOMCULTuNt ONGANUADON OF TNE watt()NATIONS FOREWORD The Food and Agriculture Organiaation of the United Nations (FAO) has been concerned with the need for soil and water conservation since its establishment in 1945. Since that time, FAO has supported numerous projects, sponsored or participated in various con- ferences and seminars, and published various bulletins, reports, proceedings, etc. to focus attention on the nature of this worldwide problem and to provide information regarding remedial action to be taken to alleviate the problem. However, the problem remains, and the increasing world population is resulting in intensified cropping of the limited areas of arable land to provide the necessary food in some countries. Unless effective conservation practices are used, such intensive cropping tends to increase the loss of soil and water resources. This trend must be reversed. The objectives of this Soils Bulletin are to present the principles and practices of tillage systems for sustained food production and to create an awareness of the need to conserve the world’s soil water and energy resources for future generations. Although energy is an integral part of tillage systems, the emphasis is on soil and water conservation. However, effects of the systems on energy are discussed where appropriate. This Bulletin emphasizes tillage systems for developing countries, but relies heavily on principles that have been developed throughout the world. It is intended mainly for the training of and use by extension workers for improving crop production through use of improved tillage systems for conserving the soil and water resources in developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Agriculture for Official Use
    PurwsscJ By Department of Agriculture for Official Use HmOLOCY AND WATER RESOURCES IN ARIZONA AND IKE SOUTHSffiST, VOLUME 7, p. 79-88. Proceedings of the 1977 meetings of the Arircna Section of the American Hater Resources Association and the Hydrology Section of the Arizona Academy of Science, held in Las Vegas, Nevada, April 15-16. A LAND IMPRINTER FOR REVEGETATION OF BARREN LAND AREAS THROUGH INFILTRATION CONTROL by R. H. Oixon and J. R. Slmanton ABSTRACT A new minimum tillage Implement, "the land Imprinter," has been designed and fabricated, and is cur rently being tested. Its design is based on water infiltration control theory developed during the past decade. The land Imprinter was developed primarily for establishing vegetation in barren land areas In semiarid and arid regions of the world. It simultaneously forms Interconnected downslope and cross- slope corrugations that shed water and then infiltrate It precisely where vegetative growth 1s to be en couraged. This controlled short distance routing of water along short waterways into small reservoirs makes more rainwater available for seed germination and seedling establishment, and less water avail able for loss by surface runoff and evaporation. The imprinter has only one moving part, in the form of a massive compound roller and central axle which turn together as a rigid assembly during operation. The compound roller consists of two imprint capsules which are linked together on the axle shaft by an axle pulling damp. The core of the imprint capsule is a hollow steel cylinder (1-m diameter and 1-m long) fabricated from 1.27-cm steel plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Tillage for Soil and Water Conservation in the Semi-Arid Tropics
    TILLAGE FOR SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION IN THE SEMI-ARID TROPICS i Tropical Resource Management Papers, ISSN 0926-9495; No. 24 Also published as thesis Wageningen University Cover design: Ernst van Cleef Tillage for soil and water conservation in the semi-arid tropics Willem Hoogmoed Voor Annelies ABSTRACT Hoogmoed, W.B., 1999. Tillage for soil and water conservation in the semi-arid tropics. Doctoral Thesis. Wageningen University, the Netherlands, (xii + 184 pp.) With ref. - With summary in Dutch, ISBN 90-5808-026-9 Soil tillage plays an important role in crop production in the semi-arid tropics (SAT). A large percentage of the soils found in these regions is light, contains non-swelling or shrinking clay minerals and has a low soil organic matter content. As a result, soils have a low structural stability and can be characterized as 'sealing, crusting and hardsetting'. The formation of seals, crusts and hardset layers is aggravated by the aggressive and unpredictable nature of the rainfall, which is also typical for the SAT. Important problems are the large losses of rainwater due to runoff from the sealed and crusted surfaces, the poor emergence from crusted seedbeds, and the very high energy requirements for tilling (breaking up) the hardset and crusted soils. In this thesis, research is reported from West Africa and Brazil. A quantification of the rainfall characteristics supports the calculation and design of tillage systems causing an optimum surface configuration in terms of water infiltration and emergence. In the West African Sahel area most fields are gently sloping (1-3%) and runoff is a widespread phenomenon; on the average 25% of the rain (mainly in the form of a few large storms during the rainy season) is lost by runoff.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands
    United States Department of Agriculture Restoring Western Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Ranges and Wildlands Report RMRS-GTR-136-vol. 1 September 2004 Volume 1 Chapters 1–17, Index Abstract ______________________________________ Monsen, Stephen B.; Stevens, Richard; Shaw, Nancy L., comps. 2004. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-136-vol-1. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Pages 1-294 plus index. This work, in three volumes, provides background on philosophy, processes, plant materials selection, site preparation, and seed and seeding equipment for revegetating disturbed rangelands, emphasizing use of native species. The 29 chapters include guidelines for planning, conducting, and managing, and contain a compilation of rangeland revegetation research conducted over the last several decades to aid practitioners in reestablishing healthy communities and curbing the spread of invasive species. Volume 1 contains the first 17 chapters plus the index. Keywords: rehabilitation, revegetation, plant ecology, seed, plant communities, wildlife habitat, invasive species, equipment, plant materials, native plants A B A—Reseeding on the Boise River watershed, 1937. B—Rangeland drill. C—Elk on burned winter range. D—Sampling soil, north-central Nevada. E—Aerial seeding. Front covers on all three volumes: Desert Experimental Range Utah. Photo by John Kinney. Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands Compilers Stephen B. Monsen Volume 1 Richard Stevens Nancy L. Shaw Chapters 1–17, index C D E i The Compilers _____________________________________ Stephen B. Monsen (retired), Botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Provo, Utah Richard Stevens, Project Leader (retired), Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Great Basin Research Center, Ephraim, Utah Nancy L.
    [Show full text]