Playing Pitch Assessment Update 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 1 Introduction 5 Chapter 2 a Framework for Analysing Rugby Men’S Body Concerns 20
This item was submitted to Loughborough’s Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) by the author and is made available under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ Rugby Union Men: Body Concerns by Natalie Darko Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of PhD Doctoral Thesis of Loughborough University (July 2012) Natalie Darko 1 Abstract Existing research shows that increasing numbers of young men are dissatisfied with the appearance of their bodies. Drummond (2002a; 2005; 2010) has found that men will use sport and health-related sports acts to conceal these concerns from others. Accordingly, men’s body dissatisfactions are documented less frequently because the practices drawn upon to conceal them are perceived as routine forms of masculine behaviour. Rugby union is one of the most popular sports played by young men in England. Historically, the male rugby player is culturally perceived as strong, tough and unemotionally articulate. Existing research draws attention to health issues, such as performance stress and injury that arise through participation in this sport. Research also shows that rugby union players are likely to experience concerns about gaining weight, yet these are disguised within the requirements of training for the sport. Although, there are studies that examine the constitution of masculinities, the experience of pain and injury and career transitions among rugby union players there are no studies, as yet, that examine how rugby union men experience body concerns and manage these experiences through their sport. -
RFU Strategy 2021 Onwards
ENGLAND RUGBY STRATEGY A SUCCESSFUL AND THRIVING GAME ACROSS ENGLAND WWW.ENGLANDRUGBY.COM STRATEGY 2021 ONWARDS CHAIR OF THE BOARD 0 OUR PURPOSE 2 TO ENRICH LIVES, INTRODUCE MORE PEOPLE TO RUGBY UNION AND DEVELOP THE SPORT ANDY COSSLETT FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS. CHAIR This strategy came together through an extended, in our ability to successfully take this strategy forward. multi-stage consultation process with a final Board But while the lead might come from Twickenham, to truly review to ensure the priorities remain fit for purpose achieve our core purpose and grow the game, everyone in in a post Covid world. We are confident that they do. the RFU needs to get behind this. Good strategies provide clarity and direction to align the e!ort and resources of an organisation. We very much The tireless e!orts of volunteers across the game are hope this document will do this for us, acting as a shared constantly inspiring and we know how tough the last year roadmap for everyone involved in the game. has been on clubs and individuals alike. But this is the moment for the game to rebound and to come together The last few years have been turbulent ones for the RFU and in common endeavour. With a game united and aligned we have had our fair share of challenges. But we emerge in behind a winning strategy, we can look forward to making good shape and in good heart, on a sound financial footing the years ahead hugely successful both for the RFU and for and with strengthened governance and leadership in place. -
National Facilities Strategy for Rugby Union in England
THE NATIONAL FACILITIES STRATEGY FOR RUGBY UNION IN ENGLAND 2013-2017 National Facilities Strategy National Facilities Strategy CONTENTS Introduction 2 Executive Summary 3 1. Overarching Context 4 (i) Strategy & Investment to date 4 (ii) The Government & Sport England agenda 6 (iii) Rugby union 7 (iv) Where the game is played 8 (v) The professional game: Premiership & Championship 9 2. Strategic Rugby Priorities 10 3. Rugby Development 11 (i) Core Purpose & Key Drivers 11 (ii) Club Development: Off Field Support 12 (iii) Game Development: On Field Support 12 4. Framework for Facility Provision 13 (i) Why are facilities needed? 13 Model Venues 15 (ii) What facilities are needed? 18 (iii) Where are facility improvements needed? 20 (iv) How might facilities be delivered? 24 5. Other Key Factors in the Delivery of this Strategy 25 6. Summary 29 7. Glossary 30 8. References 31 9. Contacts 32 3 3 National Facilities Strategy INTRODUCTION This Strategy provides a framework for the RFU’s long-term commitment to establishing and managing a high quality and accessible facility network for rugby union in England. The strategy is designed to: • Recognise the role of facility development in the delivery of community rugby’s core purpose and key drivers. • Provide evidence-based conclusions on the current key facility issues affecting the sustainability and growth of rugby union in England. • Set out priority areas for future investment. • Outline a facility planning model to enable the delivery of this strategy at a local level. • Highlight other key factors in the delivery of high quality facilities. • Outline the need for and role of associated Investment Strategies in the delivery of this facility strategy. -
Open PDF 324KB
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Oral evidence: The impact of COVID-19 on DCMS sectors - sport, HC 291 Tuesday 5 May 2020 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 5 May 2020. Watch the meeting Members present: Julian Knight (Chair); Kevin Brennan; Steve Brine; Philip Davies; Clive Efford; Julie Elliott; Damian Green; Damian Hinds; Giles Watling. Questions 1-110 Witnesses I: Tom Harrison, Chief Executive Officer, England and Wales Cricket Board, Rick Parry, Chairman, English Football League, and Bill Sweeney, Chief Executive Officer, Rugby Football Union. II: Dame Katherine Grainger, Chair, UK Sport, and Tim Hollingsworth OBE, Chief Executive, Sport England. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Tom Harrison, Rick Parry and Bill Sweeney. Chair: This is the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee inquiry into the impact of COVID-19 on the digital, culture, media and sport sectors. Today we will look at sport. On our first panel of witnesses, we will have Rick Parry, the chairman of the English Football League, Tom Harrison, the chief executive of the England and Wales Cricket Board, and Bill Sweeney, the chief executive officer of the Rugby Football Union. Thank you for joining us today. Before we start the session, I will go round the members for declarations of interests. I will kick off, so to speak. I have accepted hospitality and tickets from the Premier League, the ECB and the RFU in the past 12 months. Steve Brine: I have in the past accepted tickets from the Premier League to football events. Giles Watling: I have no interests to declare apart from membership of a lovely cricket club in Frinton. -
Case Law Update: the Rugby Football Union V Consolidated Information Services Limited (Formerly Viagogo Limited) [2012] UKSC 55
Sports IP Focus Case law update: The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Limited (formerly Viagogo Limited) [2012] UKSC 55 In November 2012, the Supreme Court of England and Wales Factual background delivered its judgment on the extent of a court’s power to grant The Rugby Football Union (“RFU”) is the governing body for third party disclosure orders under the principle originally laid rugby union in England and is responsible for issuing tickets for down by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs & matches played at Twickenham stadium. The RFU deploys a specific Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133. In handing down its judgment ticketing allocation system for each international match at the Court ordered Consolidated Information Systems Limited Twickenham whereby a number of tickets are allocated to partici- (formerly Viagogo Limited) (“Viagogo“) to hand over the identity pants in the sport through affiliate clubs, referee societies, schools of individuals who, through Viagogo’s online ticket exchange, had and other bodies. sold international rugby union tickets for more than face value and The RFU’s main objective in selling tickets is to promote and in breach of the terms and conditions attaching to those tickets. develop rugby union and enhance its popularity.The RFU does not, The decision is likely to have a lasting impact on the lawful therefore, allow tickets to be resold above their face value, its terms secondary ticketing market and ticket touting practices in the UK and conditions stating that any resale or advertising of tickets at market. From the point of view of disclosure by third parties, the above face value constitutes a breach of contract rendering the tick- ruling emphasises the importance of proportionality in assessing the et null and void. -
Hertsmere PPS Assessment Report Final V2
HERTSMERE BOROUGH COUNCIL PLAYING PITCH STRATEGY ASSESSMENT REPORT MARCH 2019 QUALITY, INTEGRITY, PROFESSIONALISM Knight, Kavanagh & Page Ltd Company No: 9145032 (England) MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Registered Office: 1 -2 Frecheville Court, off Knowsley Street, Bury BL9 0UF T: 0161 764 7040 E: [email protected] www.kkp.co.uk HERTSMERE BOROUGH COUNCIL PLAYING PITCH ASSESSMENT REPORT CONTENTS GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................... 2 PART 2: FOOTBALL ....................................................................................................... 18 PART 3: THIRD GENERATION TURF (3G) ARTIFICIAL GRASS PITCHES (AGPS) ..... 48 PART 4: CRICKET .......................................................................................................... 55 PART 5: RUGBY UNION ................................................................................................ 73 PART 6: HOCKEY .......................................................................................................... 87 PART 7: GOLF ................................................................................................................ 95 PART 8: BOWLS .......................................................................................................... 107 PART 9: TENNIS ......................................................................................................... -
Written Evidence Submitted by the Rugby Football Union SPORT in OUR COMMUNITIES
Written evidence submitted by the Rugby Football Union SPORT IN OUR COMMUNITIES – RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION RESPONSE TO DCMS SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY ORGANISATIONAL SUMMARY The Rugby Football Union (RFU) is the governing body for Rugby Union in England. Across England there are four million people enjoying rugby, 500,000 regular players with more than 100,000 volunteers in almost 2,000 clubs. All profit made by the RFU is invested back into the community game and the men’s and women’s England age grade and senior teams. This written submission details the governance of Rugby Union in England and how the future of the community game can be secured. 1. ARE CURRENT SPORTS GOVERNANCE MODELS FIT FOR PURPOSE? The RFU has a co-operative structure. Rather than being a company, it is a society registered under the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act, meaning that it is a members’ organisation. The membership is predominantly rugby clubs, both professional and amateur. The Board has ultimate responsibility for the strategic direction of the RFU, and has the authority to exercise all executive functions other than clearly specified powers which are reserved to Council or the members. The Board is designed to be a combination of representatives of the game elected from the RFU Council, together with executive staff and independent non-executive directors. Directors are appointed through a rigorous skills based selection process to ensure the right combination of skills, experience and knowledge. With the exception of executive staff, all Board members are subject to limits on the time they can serve on the Board as set out in the RFU’s Rules. -
An Investigation Into the Factors That Encourage Image and Performance Enhancing Drug Taking Behaviours in Adult Rugby Players in England
Stephen Watkins Brunel University London 1 An investigation into the factors that encourage Image and Performance Enhancing Drug taking behaviours in adult rugby players in England. Stephen R. Watkins A thesis submitted for the degree of Masters of Philosophy Brunel University Department of Life Sciences September 2019 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. A copy of this thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and they must not copy it or use material from it except as permitted by law or with the consent of the author. Stephen Watkins Brunel University London 2 ABSTRACT Pages Abstract 7 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 9 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Introduction to IPED use in Rugby Union 9 1.2 Background to the World Anti-Doping Code 13 1.3 The need for research in Rugby Union 20 CHAPTER TWO – LITERATURE REVIEW 22 2. Review of Literature 22 2.1 Beginner or Young Person Studies 23 2.2 Gifted and Talented Studies 25 2.3 Performance Development Athlete and Performance Athlete Studies 26 2.4 Elite Athlete Level Studies – Attitudes and Prevalence of IPED use 27 2.5 Coach and Support Personnel Studies 33 2.6 Wider Society- Image & Performance Enhancing Drug Studies 38 2.7 Theoretical Concepts of Doping 40 2.7.1 The Push, Pull, Anti-Push, Anti-Pull Theory 41 2.7.2 The Gateway Use Theory of Doping 43 2.7.3 Moral Disengagement Theory 45 2.8 Literature Review Summary 50 2.8.1 Personal 51 2.8.2 Environmental 51 2.8.3 Performance 52 CHAPTER THREE - METHODOLOGY 53 3. -
A Holistic Performance Assessment of English Rugby Union
Different shaped ball, same financial problems? A holistic performance assessment of English Rugby Union (2006- 2015) WILSON, Robert <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-7570> and PLUMLEY, Daniel James <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-0969> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/14841/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version WILSON, Robert and PLUMLEY, Daniel James (2017). Different shaped ball, same financial problems? A holistic performance assessment of English Rugby Union (2006-2015). Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 7 (2). Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Sport, Business, Management: an International Journal Sport, Business and Management: an International Journal Different shaped ball, same financial problems? A holistic performance assessment of English Rugby Union (2006- 2015). Journal: Sport, Business, Management: an International Journal Manuscript ID SBM-10-2016-0063.R1 Manuscript Type: Research Paper sport finance, rugby union, performance measurment, financial health, Keywords: management, structure of professional team sports Sport, Business, Management: an International Journal Page 1 of 23 Sport, Business and Management: an International Journal 1 2 3 Introduction 4 5 In 1997 the Allied Dunbar Premiership was established, heralding a new era of elite 6 professional rugby and, as Williams (2012) contends, though reliant on wealthy benefactors, 7 8 clubs began to adopt a business model which was comparable to both professional football 9 and the sport of rugby league. -
Rugby Football Union Annual General Meeting 2021 Agenda
ItIIIIItem RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 2021 AGENDA 1. To consider and approve the minutes of the Annual General Meeting held on Friday 12 June 2020. 2. To receive a report from the Chief Executive for Season 2020/21. 3. To receive a Financial Report and to review the Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 (previously circulated). 4. To appoint BDO LLP as Auditors to audit the 2020/2021 financial statements. 5. To approve changes to the Rules attached to this Notice as Appendix 2 6. To consider any other business of which due notice shall have been given. 7. To hear any other relevant matter for the consideration of the Council and/or the Board of Directors during the ensuing year, but on which no voting shall be allowed. 8. To approve the following Board appointments: 8.1 Chair of the Board of Directors 8.2 Independent Non-Executive Director 9. To elect the President, Senior Vice-President and Junior Vice-President for season 2021/22. 1 of 5 AGENDA ITEM DETAILS ITEM 4 TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS FOR 2020/21 To appoint BDO LLP as Auditors to audit the 2020/2021 financial year. This is recommended by the Board of Directors and the Audit and Risk Committee. ITEM 5 TO APPROVE CHANGES TO THE RULES To approve the changes to the Rules, as set out in a redline version in Appendix 1 and a clean version in Appendix 2. We would like to highlight the following changes: Rule 21.1 – signature of the Annual Report and Accounts Currently, the Rules require that the annual report and accounts are signed by the CEO and two Council members. -
Annual Report Contents
2020 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 01 OUR PURPOSE 02 OUR VALUES 03 PRESIDENT’S FOREWORD 04 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 06 STRATEGIC REPORT • Strategic Priorities • CEO’s Review of the Year • Financial Review • Responsibilities of the Board (s172) • Future Outlook • Major Risk and Uncertainties • Corporate Social Responsibility 35 DIRECTORS’ REPORT • RFU STRUCTURE • EMPLOYMENT STATEMENT • EMPLOYEE CONSULTATION • EQUALITY STATEMENT • GOING CONCERN • CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 52 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF THE RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION 56 GROUP PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 57 PARENT PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 58 GROUP AND PARENT STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 59 BALANCE SHEETS 60 GROUP STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 61 PARENT STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 62 GROUP CASH FLOW STATEMENT 64 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 90 FOUR-YEAR SUMMARY OUR PURPOSE 0 1 TO ENRICH LIVES, INTRODUCE MORE PEOPLE TO RUGBY UNION AND DEVELOP THE SPORT FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS The Duke of Sussex, Patron Board of Directors Executive Directors Jeff Blackett,President Andy Cosslett, Chair Bill Sweeney, Chief Executive Paula Carter Sue Day Chris Cuthbertson Steve Grainger MBE Sue Day Simon Massie-Taylor Philip de Glanville Conor O’Shea Simon Massie-Taylor Stephen Pearson Company Secretary Dominic Proctor Angus Bujalski David Roberts Genevieve Shore Bill Sweeney Jonathan Webb Helen Weir CBE Wing Commander Peter Whiting Annual Report 2020 0 OUR VALUES 2 TEAMWORK RESPECT ENJOYMENT DISCIPLINE SPORTSMANSHIP RUGBY UNION IS PLAYED BY A COMPLETE CROSS SECTION OF THE COMMUNITY, WITH THE RFU RESPONSIBLE FOR AROUND SUPPORTED BY A VOLUNTEER WORKFORCE OF 4 500,000 1,900 1,400 100 130 MORE THAN MILLION REGULAR RUGBY CLUBS SECONDARY COLLEGES UNIVERSITIES ENJOYING PLAYERS SCHOOLS PLAYING PLAYING RUGBY PLAYING COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE RUGBY RUGBY 100,000 RUGBY IN THE IN OPERATING THE ENGLISH GAME PAST YEAR AT ALL LEVELS. -
Central Lancashire Strategy & Action Plan December 2018
CENTRAL LANCASHIRE STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN DECEMBER 2018 QUALITY, INTEGRITY, PROFESSIONALISM Knight, Kavanagh & Page Ltd Company No: 9145032 (England) MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Registered Office: 1 -2 Frecheville Court, off Knowsley Street, Bury BL9 0UF T: 0161 764 7040 E: [email protected] www.kkp.co.uk CENTRAL LANCASHIRE STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. 1 GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................... 2 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 PART 2: VISION ............................................................................................................. 13 PART 3: AIMS ................................................................................................................ 14 PART 4: SPORT SPECIFIC ISSUES SCENARIOS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......... 15 PART 5: STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 46 PART 6: ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................. 62 PART 7: CHORLEY ACTION PLAN ............................................................................... 65 PART 8: PRESTON ACTION PLAN ............................................................................... 86 PART 9: SOUTH RIBBLE ACTION PLAN ...................................................................