DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Evidence Submitted by the Rugby Football Union SPORT in OUR COMMUNITIES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Evidence Submitted by the Rugby Football Union SPORT in OUR COMMUNITIES Written evidence submitted by the Rugby Football Union SPORT IN OUR COMMUNITIES – RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION RESPONSE TO DCMS SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY ORGANISATIONAL SUMMARY The Rugby Football Union (RFU) is the governing body for Rugby Union in England. Across England there are four million people enjoying rugby, 500,000 regular players with more than 100,000 volunteers in almost 2,000 clubs. All profit made by the RFU is invested back into the community game and the men’s and women’s England age grade and senior teams. This written submission details the governance of Rugby Union in England and how the future of the community game can be secured. 1. ARE CURRENT SPORTS GOVERNANCE MODELS FIT FOR PURPOSE? The RFU has a co-operative structure. Rather than being a company, it is a society registered under the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act, meaning that it is a members’ organisation. The membership is predominantly rugby clubs, both professional and amateur. The Board has ultimate responsibility for the strategic direction of the RFU, and has the authority to exercise all executive functions other than clearly specified powers which are reserved to Council or the members. The Board is designed to be a combination of representatives of the game elected from the RFU Council, together with executive staff and independent non-executive directors. Directors are appointed through a rigorous skills based selection process to ensure the right combination of skills, experience and knowledge. With the exception of executive staff, all Board members are subject to limits on the time they can serve on the Board as set out in the RFU’s Rules. The RFU Council has a dual role of driving policy relating to the regulatory control of the game and monitoring and oversight of the Board, which it fulfils on behalf of the RFU’s members. The Council is made up of representatives appointed by member clubs (largely on a geographic basis through Constituent Bodies), those appointed by the national representative bodies (such as Premiership Rugby or the Rugby Players’ Association), and some ex officio and co-opted members. The Sport England Governance Code also sets out the levels of transparency, accountability and financial integrity that are required from those in receipt of government and National Lottery funding. During the year 2019/2020 the RFU received ‘Outstanding’ and ‘Good’ ratings from Sport England’s annual audit of our financial control and governance. In line with good governance practice, we conduct a three-yearly independent review into the effectiveness of the Board which concluded that it is operating effectively and we have ensured that the recommendations we received are being actioned. Diversity and Inclusion are key priorities for the RFU with an action plan agreed and implementation group in place to sponsor and support change across the organisation. Additionally, a Board level strategic review is underway looking at Board and Executive level policy in this area. The RFU Board has made a new commitment to achieving a Board composition of 30% female and 15% BAME members by 1 August 2022 at the latest. In terms of our member clubs, the RFU provides governance support via a mixture of regulation and education. In this regard detailed information is made available for clubs to use and adopt supported by workshops, webinars and dedicated helplines in a number of key areas covering structure and tax, leadership and direction and policies and procedures underpinned by the RFU’s core values. 2. AT WHAT LEVEL OF SPORT SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT CONSIDER SPENDING PUBLIC MONEY? The social and economic value of sport is significant, with the Sport Industry Research Centre at Sheffield Hallam University calculating that for every £1 spent on community sport and physical activity nearly £4 is generated, with an annual contribution to social value alone of more than £72 bn. Crucial to this social impact are the national initiatives put in place by governing bodies such as the RFU, as these ensure the benefit of sport is multiplied and felt across all parts of the country and in all sectors of society. Unlike most other team sports, Rugby Union continues to sustain overall participation with specific growth in the women’s game. To date, this is due to both the work of our clubs and national participation initiatives run by the RFU such as Inner Warrior, a programme aimed at introducing women to rugby. However, Covid-19 has significantly impacted both the RFU and clubs’ ability to generate income. Without financial support from government in the short to medium term the RFU’s investment in community programmes will be significantly curtailed. Additionally, Sport England funding is vital to improving the health and wellbeing of the nation and provides a significant return on investment. The RFU receives both core funding and additional project funding via the Families Fund. Core funding allows us to invest in player retention initiatives, Touch Rugby, Sevens and women and girls talent development. In addition, the Families Fund, enables the RFU to explore ways to improve access to sport for families from lower socio-economic groups, reach new communities and open up opportunities to all. Community sport funding via Sport England, particularly in this challenging time, is vital. Lastly, school sport is also critical to the long-term viability of both the community and elite game and is an area where Government has a significant role to play. Studies show the importance of getting young people involved in sport and activity at an early age and how this sets habits for life. From a policy perspective, the Government should commit to an hour included in the school day for physical activity and embed PE delivery in teacher training. The RFU’s 2015 World Cup legacy initiative, All Schools, resulted in 750 additional state schools across the country having rugby programmes. This demonstrates the impact that long term support for school sport can have on a generation of children. 3. WHAT ARE THE BIGGEST RISKS TO THE LONG-TERM VIABILITY OF GRASSROOTS SPORT? Currently, the biggest risk to the long-term viability of grassroots sport is the pandemic, its economic impact and the potential loss of a generation of players. Community rugby clubs are largely asset owning. In normal times this provides security and the ability to be self-sufficient, generating revenue through membership fees, match day revenue (food, beverage and tickets) and income from diversification into events and community services. However, the pandemic has shown that these clubs are also more at risk of external crisis depriving them of revenue to cover fixed costs. Covid-19 has severely impacted all clubs’ ability to generate revenue and without financial support we risk losing some for good. Most rugby clubs’ assets were gifted to clubs several generations ago and if clubs are forced to close and sell up, it will have an impact on rugby and communities for many years to come. In the short term, we require a clear roadmap for the return of community contact rugby. The RFU has been working with government on gaining approval for our proposed roadmap and this needs to be in place, alongside other team sports, for when the current lockdown is over. Once we can get rugby being played again, clubs will have the opportunity to generate revenue and start to support their own recovery. However, the risk for community clubs is not only financial. Sport England’s Active Lives Survey has already shown the effect of Covid-19 on participation and team sports are set to suffer further as a result of the second lockdown. Ensuring the long-term viability of grassroots sport will also require a plan to boost post-pandemic participation and convince people to once again take up sport. Whilst short to medium term financial support is vital for clubs’ survival, facilities investment is fundamental to our clubs’ long-term security. Government has recognised the importance of investing in facilities and has pledged to invest nationally in a multisport approach. Done correctly, this could facilitate a national network of resilient community hubs, allowing access to a number of sports in one location. Not only opening up opportunities in communities but also providing long term stability for smaller and less financially robust sports. This is critical as we seek to further diversify our participation base with the adaption of facilities, which were largely developed for men, to cater for all. However, investment must be based on accurate mapping, be appropriately targeted and be subject to proper scrutiny. There are a number of examples of funding going to large organisations to invest in multi-sport facilities, where rugby clubs have been removed from the sites at little notice, refused pitch use at peak times and more often than not, the club returns to a single sport facility relatively quickly. With rugby clubs generally owning their premises, they have the ability to provide long term security to other sports through multi-sport investment. There is no doubt that multi-sport has the opportunity to transform sport provision, but it is imperative that any such investment is well planned and executed. Lastly, the RFU and spectator sports, need a clear roadmap for the return of fans to stadiums. The sooner we can start generating revenue at pre-pandemic levels, the sooner our recovery can begin and the sooner we can start supporting rugby again. 4. WHAT KEY MEASURES COULD THE GOVERNMENT INTRODUCE TO INCREASE THE RESILIENCE OF SPORTS CLUBS AND VENUES? A sports recovery fund to: Ensure short term survival of community clubs – if clubs are lost so are their facilities and the services they provide to their local communities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 1 Introduction 5 Chapter 2 a Framework for Analysing Rugby Men’S Body Concerns 20
    This item was submitted to Loughborough’s Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) by the author and is made available under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ Rugby Union Men: Body Concerns by Natalie Darko Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of PhD Doctoral Thesis of Loughborough University (July 2012) Natalie Darko 1 Abstract Existing research shows that increasing numbers of young men are dissatisfied with the appearance of their bodies. Drummond (2002a; 2005; 2010) has found that men will use sport and health-related sports acts to conceal these concerns from others. Accordingly, men’s body dissatisfactions are documented less frequently because the practices drawn upon to conceal them are perceived as routine forms of masculine behaviour. Rugby union is one of the most popular sports played by young men in England. Historically, the male rugby player is culturally perceived as strong, tough and unemotionally articulate. Existing research draws attention to health issues, such as performance stress and injury that arise through participation in this sport. Research also shows that rugby union players are likely to experience concerns about gaining weight, yet these are disguised within the requirements of training for the sport. Although, there are studies that examine the constitution of masculinities, the experience of pain and injury and career transitions among rugby union players there are no studies, as yet, that examine how rugby union men experience body concerns and manage these experiences through their sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Wales England
    BY APPOINTMENT GIN DISTILLERS TO THE LATE KING GEORGE VI BOOTHS DISTILLERIES "...and 7 one for WALES the Home!" There is only ONE BESI ENGLAND Cardiff Arms Park SATURDAY 15th JANUARY 1955 OFFICIAL PROGRAMME ONE SHILLING ) 1 Stock WELSH RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION JOISTS yy CHANNELS ANGLES Wales TEES FLATS versus ROUNDS SQUARES England PLATES CORRUGATED CARDIFF, 15th JANUARY, 1955 SHEETS TOOLS ETC Welsh Rugby Football Union, 1954-55 PRESIDENT : W. R. Thomas, M.B.E., J.P. DUNLOP VICE-PRESIDENTS : AND T. H. Vile, J.P., Glyn Stephens, J.P., F. G. Phillips, Judge Rowe Harding, Nathan Rocyn Jones, M.A., M.D., F.R.C.S., J.P., J. E. Davies, H. S. Warrington, Hermas Evans, V. C. Phelps, W. W. Ward. RANKEN HON. TREASURER: K. M. Harris. SECRETARY: Eric Evans, M.A. LT D LEEDS When in a hurry- RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION 1954-55 TELEPHONE LEEDS 27301 PATRON: H.M. THE QUEEN (20 LINES AT YOUR SERVICE) President: W. C. RAMSAY (Middlesex) Vice-Presidents: L. CLIFFORD (Yorkshire), W. D. GIBBS (Kent) Hon. Treasurer: W. C. RAMSAY Secretary: F. D. PRENTICE Music will be provided by 1st Battalion The Welch Regiment )THE SEARCHLIGHT OF MEMORY by WILF WOOLLER FLY TO DUBLIN FOR,.. T was my good fortune to start my career for Wales at Twickenham in 1933—the first time Wales had won at the great English headquarters since their first en­ I counter there in 1910—a game in which England, on a day of memorable incidents, beat Wales for the first time in twelve years. In so doing, they broke through the IRELAND v.
    [Show full text]
  • RFU Strategy 2021 Onwards
    ENGLAND RUGBY STRATEGY A SUCCESSFUL AND THRIVING GAME ACROSS ENGLAND WWW.ENGLANDRUGBY.COM STRATEGY 2021 ONWARDS CHAIR OF THE BOARD 0 OUR PURPOSE 2 TO ENRICH LIVES, INTRODUCE MORE PEOPLE TO RUGBY UNION AND DEVELOP THE SPORT ANDY COSSLETT FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS. CHAIR This strategy came together through an extended, in our ability to successfully take this strategy forward. multi-stage consultation process with a final Board But while the lead might come from Twickenham, to truly review to ensure the priorities remain fit for purpose achieve our core purpose and grow the game, everyone in in a post Covid world. We are confident that they do. the RFU needs to get behind this. Good strategies provide clarity and direction to align the e!ort and resources of an organisation. We very much The tireless e!orts of volunteers across the game are hope this document will do this for us, acting as a shared constantly inspiring and we know how tough the last year roadmap for everyone involved in the game. has been on clubs and individuals alike. But this is the moment for the game to rebound and to come together The last few years have been turbulent ones for the RFU and in common endeavour. With a game united and aligned we have had our fair share of challenges. But we emerge in behind a winning strategy, we can look forward to making good shape and in good heart, on a sound financial footing the years ahead hugely successful both for the RFU and for and with strengthened governance and leadership in place.
    [Show full text]
  • National Facilities Strategy for Rugby Union in England
    THE NATIONAL FACILITIES STRATEGY FOR RUGBY UNION IN ENGLAND 2013-2017 National Facilities Strategy National Facilities Strategy CONTENTS Introduction 2 Executive Summary 3 1. Overarching Context 4 (i) Strategy & Investment to date 4 (ii) The Government & Sport England agenda 6 (iii) Rugby union 7 (iv) Where the game is played 8 (v) The professional game: Premiership & Championship 9 2. Strategic Rugby Priorities 10 3. Rugby Development 11 (i) Core Purpose & Key Drivers 11 (ii) Club Development: Off Field Support 12 (iii) Game Development: On Field Support 12 4. Framework for Facility Provision 13 (i) Why are facilities needed? 13 Model Venues 15 (ii) What facilities are needed? 18 (iii) Where are facility improvements needed? 20 (iv) How might facilities be delivered? 24 5. Other Key Factors in the Delivery of this Strategy 25 6. Summary 29 7. Glossary 30 8. References 31 9. Contacts 32 3 3 National Facilities Strategy INTRODUCTION This Strategy provides a framework for the RFU’s long-term commitment to establishing and managing a high quality and accessible facility network for rugby union in England. The strategy is designed to: • Recognise the role of facility development in the delivery of community rugby’s core purpose and key drivers. • Provide evidence-based conclusions on the current key facility issues affecting the sustainability and growth of rugby union in England. • Set out priority areas for future investment. • Outline a facility planning model to enable the delivery of this strategy at a local level. • Highlight other key factors in the delivery of high quality facilities. • Outline the need for and role of associated Investment Strategies in the delivery of this facility strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 324KB
    Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Oral evidence: The impact of COVID-19 on DCMS sectors - sport, HC 291 Tuesday 5 May 2020 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 5 May 2020. Watch the meeting Members present: Julian Knight (Chair); Kevin Brennan; Steve Brine; Philip Davies; Clive Efford; Julie Elliott; Damian Green; Damian Hinds; Giles Watling. Questions 1-110 Witnesses I: Tom Harrison, Chief Executive Officer, England and Wales Cricket Board, Rick Parry, Chairman, English Football League, and Bill Sweeney, Chief Executive Officer, Rugby Football Union. II: Dame Katherine Grainger, Chair, UK Sport, and Tim Hollingsworth OBE, Chief Executive, Sport England. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Tom Harrison, Rick Parry and Bill Sweeney. Chair: This is the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee inquiry into the impact of COVID-19 on the digital, culture, media and sport sectors. Today we will look at sport. On our first panel of witnesses, we will have Rick Parry, the chairman of the English Football League, Tom Harrison, the chief executive of the England and Wales Cricket Board, and Bill Sweeney, the chief executive officer of the Rugby Football Union. Thank you for joining us today. Before we start the session, I will go round the members for declarations of interests. I will kick off, so to speak. I have accepted hospitality and tickets from the Premier League, the ECB and the RFU in the past 12 months. Steve Brine: I have in the past accepted tickets from the Premier League to football events. Giles Watling: I have no interests to declare apart from membership of a lovely cricket club in Frinton.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Harry Becomes Rfu Patron
    TOUCHLINE The Official Newspaper of The RFU January 2017 Issue 197 PRINCE HARRY BECOMES RFU PATRON Prince Harry has become the Rugby Football Union’s new Patron, rugby fan, he regularly attends England matches at Twickenham following a Buckingham Palace announcement that Her Majesty and has supported the work of the RFU and its charities in that time., The Queen will be handing over the patronage. being Patron of the RFU Injured Players Foundation since January The Queen has been Patron of the RFU for 64 years, having held 2010 and working in the past in support of CBRE All Schools. Prince the role since 1952, after taking over the position from her father, Harry was also Honorary President of the 2015 Rugby World Cup. King George VI, following his death. The Queen has attended Peter Baines, RFU President, said: “It has been a privilege and an numerous rugby matches at Twickenham and two Rugby World honour to have The Queen as Patron of the RFU for over 60 years. Cups in the United Kingdom (1991 and 1999). She has been a fantastic supporter of the Union and we thank her As one of her last acts as Patron, alongside Prince Philip and for that and her contribution to the game of rugby in England.” Prince Harry, The Queen last year hosted an event at Buckingham He added: “We welcome Prince Harry as our new Patron. He has Palace during the 2015 Rugby World Cup. Over 400 senior officials been Vice Patron for a number of years already and a regular at from the RFU, England Rugby 2015, World Rugby, players, staff England Tests at Twickenham.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Law Update: the Rugby Football Union V Consolidated Information Services Limited (Formerly Viagogo Limited) [2012] UKSC 55
    Sports IP Focus Case law update: The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Limited (formerly Viagogo Limited) [2012] UKSC 55 In November 2012, the Supreme Court of England and Wales Factual background delivered its judgment on the extent of a court’s power to grant The Rugby Football Union (“RFU”) is the governing body for third party disclosure orders under the principle originally laid rugby union in England and is responsible for issuing tickets for down by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs & matches played at Twickenham stadium. The RFU deploys a specific Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133. In handing down its judgment ticketing allocation system for each international match at the Court ordered Consolidated Information Systems Limited Twickenham whereby a number of tickets are allocated to partici- (formerly Viagogo Limited) (“Viagogo“) to hand over the identity pants in the sport through affiliate clubs, referee societies, schools of individuals who, through Viagogo’s online ticket exchange, had and other bodies. sold international rugby union tickets for more than face value and The RFU’s main objective in selling tickets is to promote and in breach of the terms and conditions attaching to those tickets. develop rugby union and enhance its popularity.The RFU does not, The decision is likely to have a lasting impact on the lawful therefore, allow tickets to be resold above their face value, its terms secondary ticketing market and ticket touting practices in the UK and conditions stating that any resale or advertising of tickets at market. From the point of view of disclosure by third parties, the above face value constitutes a breach of contract rendering the tick- ruling emphasises the importance of proportionality in assessing the et null and void.
    [Show full text]
  • Rugby Football Union Adult Player Registration Form Edition 23
    Rugby Football Union Edition 23 Adult Player Registration Form VALID FROM AUGUST 2017 Registration type (tick as appropriate) Standard (7 day) or Expedited and Permitted Player (if applicable, see notes) This form is an editable pdf, except for the signature fields, which you must sign. You can also print out this form as before and complete in blue/black ink only. Send the completed form, with all required supporting documents, to your RFU Registrar only, or keep the completed documents for 12 months if applying online at levels 5 and below. 1 Applicant Club: Forename: Surname: Known as: RFU Player ID Number (if known): 2 UK Home address: Postcode: Email: Home phone number: Mobile number: Date of birth: D D M M Y Y Y Y Playing Position: 3 If player is aged 17, please tick to confirm the RFU’s permission to play adult rugby form has been completed and retained: Town of birth: Country of birth: Nationality: 4 If the country of birth not UK, you may have to provide a copy of For Premiership & Championship clubs only, please tick passport identity page (see notes). to confirm if player is qualified to play for England. If the player is coming from the jurisdiction of another Union, you may have to supply a copy of the World Rugby International Clearance 5 Form, from that Union (see notes). Please complete if the player has been previously registered, contracted to or played for any other club. If not applicable, please go to section 9 Previous club: Union: If contracted: If registered: Date of leaving: 6 D D M M Y Y D D M M Y Y D D M M Y Y 7 You must send the Notification of Transfer Form to the player’s current club, and send a copy toyour RFU Registrar, with this application.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Promotion Pontypool Rugby Club
    Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 1919 (QB) Case No: HQ12X01661 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 11 July 2012 Before : SIR RAYMOND JACK SITTING AS A JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : PARK PROMOTION LIMITED T/A Claimant PONTYPOOL RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB - and - THE WELSH RUGBY UNION LIMITED Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ian Rogers (instructed by Messrs Geldards LLP) for the Claimants Adam Lewis QC and Tom Mountford (instructed by Messrs Charles Russell LLP) for the Defendants Hearing dates: 25, 26 and 27 June 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judgment Sir Raymond Jack : 1. This case is concerned with the right of the claimant, the Pontypool Rugby Club, a club with a proud history, to continue to play in the Premier Division of Welsh rugby in the 2012/13 season. The defendant is the Welsh Rugby Union, which organises and controls the sport of rugby union in Wales. It is the view of the WRU that as a result of the re-organisation of the Premier Division to reduce the number of clubs playing in it and Pontypool’s position in order of playing meritocracy of the fourteen clubs formerly in the division, the club is now only eligible to play in the Championship, the next division down. The essence of Pontypool’s case is that clubs which are above it on a basis of playing merit have not met the requirements to hold an A licence as required for the Premiership by the WRU’s National League Rules 2011/2012, and so there is a place for Pontypool within the Premiership.
    [Show full text]
  • Football Federation Australia
    Football (Soccer): Football Federation Australia “I’d argue with kids at school and they all were convinced that rugby league was the most popular world sport. That shows how isolated Australia was. Soccer had to be introduced by migrants. We’ve come a long way.”1 Brazilian Ambassador once wondered whether Australians had a linguistic or an anatomical problem, since they seemed to reserve the term ‘football’ for games in Awhich the players predominantly use their hands.2 Such is the seeming contradiction in Australia where the term for the game played with the feet is called soccer and football (which is rugby league, rugby union or Aussie rules depending on where you live) is played mostly with the hands. Football is no longer the poor cousin of the ‘big four’ national sports in Australia – cricket, rugby league, Australian rules football and rugby union. Following the 2006 FIFA World Cup, the game has finally come of age in Australia and is starting to seriously challenge the other sports for spectator, sponsor and media support. Tracing football’s roots Playing a ball game using the feet has been happening for thousands of years. Early history reveals at least half a dozen different games, varying to different degrees, which are related to the modern game of football. The earliest form of the game for which there is reliable evidence dates back to the 2nd and 3rd centuries B.C. in China. Another form of the game, also originating in the Far East, was the Japanese Kemari, which dates from about 500 to 600 years later and is still played today.3 However, it is almost certain that the development of the modern game took place in England and Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Football from FIFA.Com • the Origins • Britain, the Home Of
    The History of Football from FIFA.com • The Origins • Britain, the home of Football • Opposition to the game • The Global Growth The Origins The contemporary history of the world's favorite game spans more than 100 years. It all began in 1863 in England, when rugby football and association football branched off on their different courses and the Football Association in England was formed - becoming the sport's first governing body. Both codes stemmed from a common root and both have a long and intricately branched ancestral tree. A search down the centuries reveals at least half a dozen different games, varying to different degrees, and to which the historical development of football has been traced back. Whether this can be justified in some instances is disputable. Nevertheless, the fact remains that people have enjoyed kicking a ball about for thousands of years and there is absolutely no reason to consider it an aberration of the more 'natural' form of playing a ball with the hands. On the contrary, apart from the need to employ the legs and feet in tough tussles for the ball, often without any laws for protection, it was recognized right at the outset that the art of controlling the ball with the feet was not easy and, as such, required no small measure of skill. The very earliest form of the game for which there is scientific evidence was an exercise from a military manual dating back to the second and third centuries BC in China. This Han Dynasty forebear of football was called Tsu' Chu and it consisted of kicking a leather ball filled with feathers and hair through an opening, measuring only 30-40cm in width, into a small net fixed onto long bamboo canes.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of PLAY Football in Tasmania
    STATE OF PLAY Football in Tasmania February 2020 www.footballfedtas.com.au CONTENTS About the State of Play Report 3 Tasmania at a glance 4 2019 Recap 5 Tasmanian Football in 2020 8 Funding 10 Key Projects for 2020 11 2 Football Tasmania ABOUT THE STATE OF PLAY REPORT The State of Play is an annual report compiled by Football Tasmania to highlight the significance of football in Tasmania, recap the previous year’s activities and participation figures and outline our key targets for football in the year ahead. As the largest participation sport in Tasmania, football brings an expansive range of benefits to our communities. By taking stock and setting these targets we hope to see The World Game grow further to allow even more Tasmanians to enjoy these benefits. Football Tasmania Football Tasmania is the peak body for The World Game in Tasmania and aims to develop and maintain a vibrant football culture to maximise opportunities for people of all ages to enjoy the benefits of our great game. Our mission is to help Tasmanians to have a healthy, enjoyable and connected life through participation in football. www.footballfedtas.com.au 3 IN TASMANIA IN 2019 THERE WERE: 38,086 400 total football participants1 (↑10.2%) futsal (indoor football) teams (↑16.3%) Over 15,000 Over $22 million registered Tasmanian football worth of funding secured for football participants2 facilities 11,668 registered outdoor players (↑5.1%) 8,068 junior players (ages 5-13) (↑6.8%) 26% proportion of registered players in Tasmania who are female, the highest proportion
    [Show full text]