DOCSLIB.ORG

Phd Thesis of Kristian Knudsen Olesen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phd Thesis of Kristian Knudsen Olesen Kristian Knudsen Olesen ANALYTICASPECTSOF THETHOMPSON GROUPS PhD Thesis Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Copenhagen PhD thesis in mathematics c Kristian Knudsen Olesen, 2016 Typeset in Times Roman and Computer Modern using LATEX. Printed by Polyteknisk Boghandel. ISBN 978-87-7078-948-6 PhD thesis submitted to the PhD School of Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark in July 2016. Academic advisors: Magdalena Musat Uffe Haagerup University of Copenhagen, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark Denmark Assessment committee: Nicolas Monod Tullio Ceccherini- Ryszard Nest (chair) École Polytechnique Silberstein University of Copenhagen, Fédérale de Lausanne Universita del Sannio, Denmark Switzerland Italy Kristian Knudsen Olesen Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Copenhagen Universitetsparken 5 DK-2100 København Ø Denmark [email protected] I always suppose anything people please, [...] — Edmond Dantes, The Count of Monte Cristo Abstract In this thesis we study various analytic aspects of the Thompson groups, sev- eral of them related to amenability. In joint work with Uffe Haagerup, we prove that the Thompson groups T and V are not inner amenable, and give a criteria for non-amenability of the Thompson group F . More precisely, we prove that F is non-amenable if the reduced group C∗-algebra of T is simple. Whilst doing so, we investigate the C∗-algebras generated by the image of the Thompson groups in the Cuntz algebra O2 via a representation discovered by Nekrashevych. Based on this, we obtain new equivalent conditions to F being non-amenable. Furthermore, we prove that the reduced group C∗-algebra of a non-inner amenable group possessing the rapid decay property of Jolissaint is simple with a unique tracial state. We then provide some applications of this criteria. In the last part of the thesis, inspired by recent work of Garncarek, we con- struct one-parameter families of representations of the Thompson group F on the Hilbert space L2([0, 1], m), where m denotes the Lebesgue measure, and we investigate when these are irreducible and mutually inequivalent. In addition, we exhibit a particular family of such representations, depending on parame- ters s R and p (0, 1), and prove that these are irreducible for all values of s ∈ ∈ and p, and non-unitarily equivalent for different values of p. We furthermore show that these representations are strongly continuous in both parameters, and that they converge to the trivial representation, as p tends to zero or one. Resumé I denne afhandling studerer vi diverse analytiske aspekter af Thompson-grup- perne, flere af hvilke er relateret til amenabilitet. I samarbejde med Uffe Haagerup viser vi, at Thompson-grupperne T og V ikke er indre amenable og giver et kri- terium, for at Thompson-gruppen F ikke er amenabel. Helt konkret viser vi, at F ikke er amenabel, hvis den reducerede gruppe-C∗-algebra hørende til T er simpel. I processen undersøger vi de C∗-algebraer som bliver genereret af billederne af Thompson-grupperne via en repræsentation i Cuntz-algebraerne O2, der blev op- daget af Nekrashevych. Baseret på dette giver vi nye ækvivalente betingelser for, at F ikke er amenabel. Derudover viser vi, at hvis en gruppe ikke er indre amenabel, men har ra- pid decay-egenskaben introduceret af Jolissaint, da er dens reducerede gruppe- C∗-algebra simpel og har en unik sportilstand. Efterfølgende præsenterer vi nogle anvendelser af dette resultat. Den sidste del af afhandlingen er inspireret af resultater af Garncarek. I denne konstruerer vi ét-parameter-familier af repræsentationer af Thompson-gruppen F på Hilbertrummet L2([0, 1], m), hvor m betegner Lebesguemålet. Vi undersøger, hvornår disse repræsentationer er irreducible, og hvornår de ikke er parvist ækvi- valente. Derudover producerer vi en konkret familie af sådanne repræsentationer, afhængig af to parametre s R og p (0, 1), samt viser at disse er irreducible ∈ ∈ for alle værdier af s og p, og ikke unitært ækvivalente for forskellige værdier af p. Ydermere viser vi, at repræsentationerne er stærkt kontinuerte i begge parametre og konvergerer mod den trivielle repræsentation, når p går med nul eller en. Contents Contents7 1 Introduction9 1.1 Notation and terminology........................ 12 2 The Thompson groups 15 2.1 The definition.............................. 15 2.2 Rearrangement of dyadic partitions................... 18 2.3 The Minkowski question mark function ................ 21 2.4 Piecewise projective linear maps.................... 29 3 Inner amenability 41 3.1 Amenable actions............................ 41 3.2 Introduction to inner amenability and property Γ . 49 3.3 The Thompson groups and inner amenability ............. 52 4 Operator algebras and the Thompson groups 55 4.1 A representation in the Cuntz algebra ................. 55 4.2 Simplicity and unique trace....................... 59 4.3 The rapid decay property........................ 66 4.4 A criterion for C∗-simplicity...................... 68 5 Families of irreducible representations 75 5.1 One map, lots of representations.................... 75 5.2 Ergodicity and equivalence relations.................. 86 5.3 Bernoulli measures on the unit interval................. 93 5.4 A construction..............................103 5.5 A re-construction............................115 5.6 Further thoughts and projects......................117 Bibliography 119 Index 125 7 Chapter 1 Introduction In 1965 Richard Thompson introduced three groups now commonly referred to as the Thompson groups. These groups, denoted by F , T and V , have been the cen- ter of much study since their introduction, and a particularly famous open problem regarding these groups asks whether or not F is amenable. This question has been studied intensely and several unsuccessful attempts have been made to prove or dis- prove amenability of F . The three groups satisfy F T V , and it is well-known ⊆ ⊆ that the Thompson groups T and V are non-amenable, as they contain a copy of F2, the free group on two generators. However, F does not contain a copy of F2, as proved by Brin and Squire [8] in 1985. Thus F has been for a long time a candidate for a finitely generated counterexample to the von Neumann conjecture, stating that the only obstruction to amenability is containment of F2. The von Neumann con- jecture was disproved in 1980 by Olshanskii [56], but his counterexample was not finitely generated. A finitely generated counterexample was found later by Olshan- skii and Sapir [58], and, recently, several highly accessible counterexamples have been produced by Monod [53] and by Lodha and Moore [50]. In this thesis we ap- proach the question of amenability of F by proving that the Thompson group F is non-amenable if the reduced group C∗-algebra of T is simple, thus giving an operator algebraic criterion for non-amenability of F . This result has been obtained in joint work with Uffe Haagerup, who was our main supervisor until his passing away in July, 2015. After announcing this result at various conferences, several partial con- verses have been obtained, first by Bleak and Juschenko [6] and later by Breuillard, Kalantar, Kennedy and Ozawa [7]. Recently, Le Boudec and Matte Bon [49] proved that the (full) converse statement holds, namely that F is non-amenable if and only if the reduced group C∗-algebra of T is simple. The study of groups whose reduced group C∗-algebra is simple, also known as C∗-simple groups, respectively, of groups whose reduced group C∗-algebra has a unique tracial state, also known as groups with the unique trace property, has been an important topic in operator algebra theory since 1975, when Powers [60] proved that F2 is C∗-simple and has the unique trace 9 10 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION property. Over the years, many groups have been proven to be C∗-simple with the unique trace property, and a famous long time open question of de la Harpe asked whether or not C∗-simplicity and the unique trace property of a group are equivalent. Recently, a tremendous progress has been made regarding these two properties, and the question of de la Harpe has been completely settled. It was first proved by Poz- nansky [61] in 2009 that the two properties are equivalent for linear groups, however, it turns out that they are not equivalent in general. More precisely, in 2014 Kalan- tar and Kennedy [43] gave a characterization of C∗-simplicity in terms of certain boundary actions of the given group, and later the same year Breuillard, Kalantar, Kennedy and Ozawa [7] proved that C∗-simplicity implies the unique trace property. The year after, Le Boudec [48] gave an example of a C∗-simple group without the unique trace property, thus settling the question of de la Harpe. It is already known that the Thompson group T has the unique trace property, as shown by Dudko and Medynets [25] in 2012, but is remains an open question whether T is C∗-simple. In order to prove that C∗-simplicity of the group T implies non-amenability of F , we use a representation of the Thompson groups in the unitary group of the Cuntz algebra O2, introduced by Nekrashevych [55] in 2004. In addition to this result, we also prove, in collaboration with Haagerup, that the C∗-algebras generated by the representations of F , T and V are distinct, and that the one generated by V is all of O2. We then give equivalent conditions to F being non-amenable in terms of whether certain ideals in the reduced group C∗-algebras of F and T are proper. Another result we prove in collaboration with Haagerup is that the Thompson groups T and V are not inner amenable, thus settling a question that Chifan raised at a conference in Alba-Iulia in 2013. The notion of inner amenability was introduced by Effros [26] in 1975 in order to give a group theoretic characterization of property Γ of Murray and von Neumann for group von Neumann algebras of discrete ICC groups.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uniform Simplicity of Groups with Proximal Action
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, SERIES B Volume 4, Pages 110–130 (September 6, 2017) http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/btran/18 UNIFORM SIMPLICITY OF GROUPS WITH PROXIMAL ACTION SWIATOS´ LAW R. GAL AND JAKUB GISMATULLIN, WITH AN APPENDIX BY NIR LAZAROVICH Abstract. We prove that groups acting boundedly and order-primitively on linear orders or acting extremely proximally on a Cantor set (the class in- cluding various Higman-Thomson groups; Neretin groups of almost automor- phisms of regular trees, also called groups of spheromorphisms; the groups of quasi-isometries and almost-isometries of regular trees) are uniformly simple. Explicit bounds are provided. Contents 1. Introduction 110 2. Burago-Ivanov-Polterovich method 115 3. Bounded actions on ordered sets 116 4. Proximality, primitivity, and double-transitivity 118 5. Extremely proximal actions on a Cantor set and uniform simplicity 120 6. Groups almost acting on trees 123 7. Appendix by Nir Lazarovich: Simplicity of AI(Tq)andQI(Tq) 127 Acknowledgments 129 References 129 1. Introduction Let Γ be a group. It is called N-uniformly simple if for every nontrivial f ∈ Γ and nontrivial conjugacy class C ⊂ Γ the element f istheproductofatmost N elements from C±1. A group is uniformly simple if it is N-uniformly simple for some natural number N. Uniformly simple groups are called sometimes, by other authors, groups with finite covering number or boundedly simple groups (see, e.g., [15, 19, 22]). We call Γ boundedly simple if N is allowed to depend on C. The purpose of this paper is to prove results on uniform simplicity, in particular Received by the editors June 14, 2016, and, in revised form, February 27, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chameleon Groups of Richards J. Thompson : Automorphisms and Dynamics
    PUBLICATIONS MATHÉMATIQUES DE L’I.H.É.S. MATTHEW G. BRIN The chameleon groups of Richards J. Thompson : automorphisms and dynamics Publications mathématiques de l’I.H.É.S., tome 84 (1996), p. 5-33 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=PMIHES_1996__84__5_0> © Publications mathématiques de l’I.H.É.S., 1996, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Publications mathématiques de l’I.H.É.S. » (http:// www.ihes.fr/IHES/Publications/Publications.html) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou im- pression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ THE CHAMELEON GROUPS OF RICHARD J. THOMPSON: AUTOMORPHISMS AND DYNAMICS by MATTHEW G. BRIN CONTENTS Part I. Background........................................................................... 6 0. Introduction ............................................................................. Q 1. Statements, history and outline............................................................. 8 1.1. Definitions and statements ............................................................ 8 1.2. Outline of the paper ................................................................. 10 1:3. Prior and related work ............................................................... 10 1.4. Other literature on
    [Show full text]
  • The Banach–Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 25: Thompson's Group F
    The Banach{Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 25: Thompson's Group F 30 October 2012 Thompson's groups F , T and V In 1965 Richard Thompson (a logician) defined 3 groups F ≤ T ≤ V Each is finitely presented and infinite, and Thompson used them to construct groups with unsolvable word problem. From the point of view of amenability F is the most important. The group F is not elementary amenable and does not have a subgroup which is free of rank ≥ 2. We do not know if F is amenable. The groups T and V are finitely presented infinite simple groups. The commutator subgroup [F ; F ] of F is finitely presented and ∼ 2 simple and F =[F ; F ] = Z . Definition of F We can define F to be the set of piecewise linear homeomorphisms f : [0; 1] ! [0; 1] which are differentiable except at finitely many a dyadic rationals (i.e. rationals 2n 2 (0; 1)), and such that on intervals of differentiability the derivatives are powers of 2. Examples See sketches of A and B. Lemma F is a subgroup of the group of all homeomorphisms [0; 1] ! [0; 1]. Proof. Let f 2 F have breakpoints 0 = x0 < x1 < ··· < xn = 1. Then f (x) = a1x on [0; x1] where a1 is a power of 2, so f (x1) = a1x1 is a dyadic rational. Hence f (x) = a2x + b2 on [x1; x2] where a2 is a power of 2 and b2 is dyadic rational. By induction f (x) = ai x + bi on [xi−1; xi ] with ai a power of 2 and bi a dyadic rational.
    [Show full text]
  • On Closed Subgroups of the R. Thompson Group F
    On closed subgroups of the R. Thompson group F G. Golan-Polak, M. Sapir∗ Abstract We prove that Thompson’s group F has a subgroup H such that the conjugacy problem in H is undecidable and the membership problem in H is easily decidable. The subgroup H of F is a closed subgroup of F . That is, every function in F which is a piecewise-H function belongs to H. Other interesting examples of closed −→ subgroups of F include Jones’ subgroups F n and Jones’ 3-colorable subgroup F. By a recent result of the first author, all maximal subgroups of F of infinite index are closed. In this paper we prove that if K ≤ F is finitely generated then the closure of K, i.e., the smallest closed subgroup of F which contains K, is finitely generated. We also prove that all finitely generated closed subgroups of F are undistorted in F . In particular, all finitely generated maximal subgroups of F are undistorted in F . 1 Introduction Recall that R. Thompson’s group F is the group of all piecewise-linear homeomorphisms of the interval [0, 1] with finitely many breakpoints, where all breakpoints are finite Z 1 dyadic (i.e., elements of the set [ 2 ] ∩ (0, 1)) and all slopes are integer powers of 2. The group F has a presentation with two generators and two defining relations [13]. Algorithmic problems in F have been extensively studied. It is well known that the word problem in F is decidable in linear time [13, 34, 21] and that the conjugacy problem is decidable in linear time [21, 3, 4].
    [Show full text]
  • Central Sequences in the Factor Associated with Thompson's Group F
    ANNALES DE L’INSTITUT FOURIER PAUL JOLISSAINT Central sequences in the factor associated with Thompson’s group F Annales de l’institut Fourier, tome 48, no 4 (1998), p. 1093-1106 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIF_1998__48_4_1093_0> © Annales de l’institut Fourier, 1998, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’institut Fourier » (http://annalif.ujf-grenoble.fr/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une in- fraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 48, 4 (1998), 1093-1106 CENTRAL SEQUENCES IN THE FACTOR ASSOCIATED WITH THOMPSONS GROUP F by Paul JOLISSAINT 1. Introduction. The group F is the following subgroup of the group of homeomor- phisms of the interval [0,1]: it is the set of piecewise linear homeomor- phisms of [0,1] that are differentiable except at finitely many dyadic ratio- nal numbers and such that on intervals of differentiability the derivatives are integral powers of 2. It was discovered by R. Thompson in 1965 and re- discovered later by homotopy theorists. Its history is sketched in [6] where many results that we need here are proved. To begin with, it is known that F admits the following presentation F = (a;o,^i,... | x^XnXi =Xn+i 0 < i < n) . Since Xn = x'Q'~/x\x'1Q~l for n ^ 2, F is generated by XQ and a-i, and in the geometric realization above, the corresponding homeomorphisms Xn are defined by t if 0 <: t < 1 - 2-71 I + t(1 - 2-n) if 1 - 2-71 < ^ < 1 - 2-71-1 XnW -{ ^ _ ^_2 ^ ^ _ ^-n-i < ^ < 1 _ 2-n-2 2t-l ifl-2-71-2 <t<l.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplicity of Groups of Homeomorphisms
    SUBGROUP DYNAMICS AND C∗-SIMPLICITY OF GROUPS OF HOMEOMORPHISMS ADRIEN LE BOUDEC AND NICOLÁS MATTE BON Abstract. We study the uniformly recurrent subgroups of groups acting by homeomor- phisms on a topological space. We prove a general result relating uniformly recurrent subgroups to rigid stabilizers of the action, and deduce a C∗-simplicity criterion based on the non-amenability of rigid stabilizers. As an application, we show that Thompson’s group V is C∗-simple, as well as groups of piecewise projective homeomorphisms of the real line. This provides examples of finitely presented C∗-simple groups without free sub- groups. We prove that a branch group is either amenable or C∗-simple. We also prove the converse of a result of Haagerup and Olesen: if Thompson’s group F is non-amenable, then Thompson’s group T must be C∗-simple. Our results further provide sufficient con- ditions on a group of homeomorphisms under which uniformly recurrent subgroups can be completely classified. This applies to Thompson’s groups F , T and V , for which we also deduce rigidity results for their minimal actions on compact spaces. 1. Introduction Let G be a second countable locally compact group. The set Sub(G) of all closed sub- groups of G admits a natural topology, defined by Chabauty in [Cha50]. This topology turns Sub(G) into a compact metrizable space, on which G acts continuously by conjugation. The study of G-invariant Borel probability measures on Sub(G), named invariant ran- dom subgroups (IRS’s) after [AGV14], is a fast-developing topic [AGV14, ABB+12, Gla14, BDL16].
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Groups for Systems of Groups, and Their Finiteness Properties
    THOMPSON GROUPS FOR SYSTEMS OF GROUPS, AND THEIR FINITENESS PROPERTIES STEFAN WITZEL AND MATTHEW C. B. ZAREMSKY Abstract. We describe a general procedure for constructing a Thompson-like group out of a system of groups that is equipped with what we call a cloning system. Existing examples include the trivial group, symmetric groups, braid groups and pure braid groups, which yield the Thompson groups F , V , Vbr and Fbr, respectively. We give new examples of systems of groups that admit a cloning system and study how the finiteness properties of the resulting Thompson group depend on those of the original groups. The main new examples here include upper triangular matrix groups over rings of S-integers, and also mock reflection groups. Introduction In 1965 Richard Thompson introduced three groups that today are usually denoted F , T , and V . These have received a lot of recent attention for their interesting and often surprising properties. Most prominently, T and V are finitely presented, infinite, simple groups, and F is not elementary amenable and contains no non-abelian free subgroups. It is an ongoing problem to determine whether F is amenable or not. As far as finiteness properties are concerned, which is what we will be most interested in, F is an example of a torsion-free group that is of type F1 without being of type F. For these and other reasons, numerous generalizations of Thompson's groups have been introduced in the literature; see for example [Hig74, Ste92, GS97, R¨ov99, Bri04, Hug09, MPN, BF]. Most of these constructions either generalize the way in which branching can occur, or mimic the self-similarity in some way.
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson's Group F
    THOMPSON'S GROUP F A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by James Michael Belk August 2004 c 2004 James Michael Belk ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THOMPSON'S GROUP F James Michael Belk, Ph.D. Cornell University 2004 We introduce two new types of diagrams that aid in understanding elements of Thompson's group F . The first is the two-way forest diagram, which represents an element of F as a pair of infinite, bounded binary forests together with an order-preserving bijection of the leaves. These diagrams have the same relationship to a certain action of F on the real line that the standard tree diagrams have to the action of F on the unit interval. Using two-way forest diagrams, we derive a simple length formula for elements of F with respect to the finite generating set x0; x1 . f g We then discuss several applications of two-way forest diagrams and the length formula to the geometry of F . These include a simplification of a result by S. Cleary and J. Taback that F has dead ends but no deep pockets; a precise calculation of the growth function of the positive submonoid with respect to the x0; x1 f g generating set; a new upper bound on the isoperimetric constant (a.k.a. Cheeger constant) of F ; and a proof that F is not minimally almost convex. Next, we introduce strand diagrams for elements of F . These are similar to tree diagrams, but they can be concatenated like braids.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geometric Study of Commutator Subgroups
    A Geometric Study of Commutator Subgroups Thesis by Dongping Zhuang In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2009 (Defended May 12, 2009) ii °c 2009 Dongping Zhuang All Rights Reserved iii To my parents iv Acknowledgments I am deeply indebted to my advisor Danny Calegari, whose guidance, stimulating suggestions and encour- agement help me during the time of research for and writing of this thesis. Thanks to Danny Calegari, Michael Aschbacher, Tom Graber and Matthew Day for graciously agreeing to serve on my Thesis Advisory Committee. Thanks to Koji Fujiwara, Jason Manning, Pierre Py and Matthew Day for inspiring discussions about the work contained in this thesis. Thanks to my fellow graduate students. Special thanks to Joel Louwsma for helping improve the writing of this thesis. Thanks to Nathan Dunfield, Daniel Groves, Mladen Bestvina, Kevin Wortman, Irine Peng, Francis Bonahon, Yi Ni and Jiajun Wang for illuminating mathematical conversations. Thanks to the Caltech Mathematics Department for providing an excellent environment for research and study. Thanks to the Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences of Tokyo Institute of Technology; to Sadayoshi Kojima for hosting my stay in Japan; to Eiko Kin and Mitsuhiko Takasawa for many interesting mathematical discussions. Finally, I would like to give my thanks to my family and my friends whose patience and support enable me to complete this work. v Abstract Let G be a group and G0 its commutator subgroup. Commutator length (cl) and stable commutator length (scl) are naturally defined concepts for elements of G0.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0708.4250V5 [Math.GR]
    CONJUGACY AND DYNAMICS IN THOMPSON’S GROUPS JAMES BELK AND FRANCESCO MATUCCI ABSTRACT. We give a unified solution to the conjugacy problem for Thompson’s groups F, T, and V. The solution uses “strand diagrams”, which are similar in spirit to braids and generalize tree-pair diagrams for elements of Thompson’s groups. Strand diagrams are closely related to piecewise-linear functions for elements of Thompson’s groups, and we use this correspondence to investigate the dynamics of elements of F. Though many of the results in this paper are known, our approach is new, and it yields elegant proofs of several old results. 1. INTRODUCTION In the late 1960’s, Richard J. Thompson introduced three groups F, T , and V, now known collectively as Thompson’s groups. The group F consists of all piecewise-linear homeomorphisms of [0,1] with finitely many breakpoints satisfying the following condi- tions: (1) Every slope is a power of two, and (2) Every breakpoint has dyadic rational coordinates. The groups T and V are defined similarly, except that T is a group of homeomorphisms of the circle, and V is a group of homeomorphisms of the Cantor set. These three groups have been studied extensively, and we will assume that they are somewhat familiar to the reader. For a thorough introduction, see the notes by Cannon, Floyd and Parry [7]. In this paper, we present a unified solution to the conjugacy problems for Thompson’s groups F, T , and V. The conjugacy problems for F and V have been solved separately before: a solution for F was given by Guba and Sapir [10] in the more general context of diagram groups, while a solution for V was given by Higman [11] and again by Salazar- Diaz [21].
    [Show full text]
  • Schreier Graphs of Thompson's Group T Allen Pennington University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 3-23-2017 Schreier Graphs of Thompson's Group T Allen Pennington University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Mathematics Commons Scholar Commons Citation Pennington, Allen, "Schreier Graphs of Thompson's Group T" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6740 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Schreier Graphs of Thompson’s Group T by Allen C. Pennington A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Mathematics & Statistics College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Dmytro Savchuk, Ph.D. Mile Krajcevski, Ph.D. Mohamed Elhamdadi, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 22, 2017 Keywords: amenable, gromov, cayley, action, homeomorphism Copyright c 2017, Allen C. Pennington Table of Contents List of Tables . ii List of Figures . iii Abstract . iv Chapter 1 Introduction . 1 Chapter 2 Thompson’s Groups F and T ........................... 4 Chapter 3 Schreier Graphs . 7 1 Chapter 4 Schreier Graph of StabT ( 2 ) in T .........................10 Chapter 5 Application: Nonamenability of the Action of T on S1 . 21 Bibliography . 26 i List of Tables Table 1 Changing the vertex labels while moving along the edges in the Schreier graph of 1 StabF ( 2 ) .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Presentations of Thompson's Groups and Applications
    NEW PRESENTATIONS OF THOMPSON'S GROUPS AND APPLICATIONS UFFE HAAGERUP AND GABRIEL PICIOROAGA Abstract. We find new presentations for the Thompson's groups F , the de- 0 rived group F and the intermediate group D. These presentations have a common ground in that their relators are the same and only the generating sets differ. As an application of these presentations we extract the following 0 consequences: the cost of the group F is 1 hence the cost cannot decide the 0 (non)amenability question of F ; the II1 factor L(F ) is inner asymptotically abelian and the reduced C∗-algebra of F is not residually finite dimensional. 1. Introduction The Thompson group F can be regarded as the group of piecewise-linear, orientation-preserving homeomorphisms of the unit interval which have breakpoints only at dyadic points and on intervals of differentiability the slopes are powers of two. The group was discovered in the '60s by Richard Thompson and in connection with the now celebrated groups T and V led to the first example of a finitely presented infinite simple group. Also, it has been shown that the commutator 0 subgroup F of F is simple. In 1979 R. Geoghegan conjectured that F is not amenable. This problem is still open and of importance for group theory: either outcome will help better understand the inclusions EA ⊂ AG ⊂ N F , where EA is the class of elementary amenable groups, AG is the class of amenable groups and N F is the class of groups not containing free (non-abelian) groups. By work of Grigorchuck [Gr], Olshanskii and Sapir [OS], the inclusions above are strict.
    [Show full text]