Increasing the Minimum Wage in British Columbia a Flawed Anti-Poverty Policy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Increasing the Minimum Wage in British Columbia a Flawed Anti-Poverty Policy FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN 2018 Increasing the Minimum Wage in British Columbia A Flawed Anti-Poverty Policy by Charles Lammam and Hugh MacIntyre MAIN CONCLUSIONS ■ As part of its effort to alleviate poverty, Pre- earners in BC had an employed spouse. Of these, mier John Horgan’s government plans on raising 93.1% had spouses that were either self-employed the minimum wage from $11.35 in 2018 to $15.20 per or earning more than the minimum wage. Just hour by 2021, a 34% increase over three years. But, 2.0% of workers earning minimum wage in raising the minimum wage is not an effective way to Canada were single parents with young children. alleviate poverty primarily because the policy fails to provide help targeted to families living in poverty. ■ In addition to ineffectively targeting the working poor, raising the minimum wage produ- ■ In 2015, the latest year of available data, ces several unintended economic consequences 84.3% of workers earning minimum wage in Brit- to the detriment of young and inexperienced ish Columbia did not live in a low-income family. workers. These include fewer job opportunities, Though counterintuitive, it makes sense once decreases in hours available for work, reduc- we explore their age and family situation. In fact, tions in non-wage benefits, a shift towards most of those earning minimum wage are not the automation, and higher consumer prices, which primary or sole income-earner in their family. disproportionately hurt the working poor. ■ In 2017, 55.7% of all minimum wage earners in ■ A work-based subsidy is a more effect- BC were under the age of 25 and the vast major- ive policy since it better targets the benefits to ity of them (77.9%) lived with a parent or other those in need without these negative economic relatives. Moreover, 22.2% of all minimum wage consequences. fraserinstitute.org FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN 1 Increasing the Minimum Wage in British Columbia: A Flawed Anti-Poverty Policy Introduction second discusses the characteristics of minimum wage earners in British Columbia; the third brief- British Columbia Premier John Horgan’s govern- ly discusses the unintended economic conse- ment plans to raise the minimum wage from quences of raising the minimum wage. The final $11.35 per hour in 2018 to $15.20 by 2021, a 34% section points to an alternative policy option—a increase over three years. On why his government work-based subsidy such as the Canada Workers will do so, Premier Horgan said: “The way to start Benefit—that more directly targets benefits to the down the right path is to find a way to lift people working poor without causing the same negative out of poverty” (Zussman, 2018). However, rais- economic consequences. ing the minimum wage is not an efficient way to provide help targeted to families living in poverty and therefore will largely be ineffective at lifting Evolution of British Columbia’s workers out of poverty. The inability to provide minimum wage since 2002 help targeted at the working poor, coupled with the associated negative unintended economic Before discussing the characteristics of those consequences, is why raising the minimum wage earning minimum wage, it is useful to give the is not an effective way to alleviate poverty. background of the government’s plan to raise the minimum wage to $15.20 per hour by 2021. This publication evaluates increasing the min- Figure 1 displays the evolution of the minimum imum wage as a strategy for alleviating poverty wage in British Columbia over the course of two in British Columbia. It is divided into four sec- decades, with average minimum wage rates from tions: the first discusses the evolution of British 2002 to 2021. To control for inflation, the rates Columbia’s minimum wage since 2002; the are in constant 2021 dollars. Figure 1: Minimum wage rates (2021 $) in British Columbia, 2002–2021 16 $14.95 14 12 $10.84 10 8 $9.53 6 Minimum (2021 $) wage 4 2 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Notes: [1] The minimum wage rates are pro-rated averages of the legislated minimum wage rates. For example, the BC government plans on raising the minimum wage from $14.60 to $15.20 on June 1, 2021, resulting in an average rate of $14.95 in 2017. [2] Ination rates for 2018 and beyond are projections from the BC government’s 2018 budget. Sources: British Columbia, Ministry of Finance, 2018; British Columbia, Oce of the Premier, 2018; Canada.ca, 2017; Statistics Canada, 2018a. fraserinstitute.org FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN 2 Increasing the Minimum Wage in British Columbia: A Flawed Anti-Poverty Policy From 2002 to 2010, the inflation-adjusted min- Most of this data is for 2017, the year before the imum wage declined 12.1% from $10.84 to $9.53, government announced the increase to $15.20. reflecting the freeze of the nominal minimum Knowing who earns the minimum wage is critical wage rate that started in November 2001.1 for an evidence-based understanding of why the However, after 2010, increases in the minimum minimum wage does not effectively target the wage outpaced inflation. British Columbia’s working poor. In 2017, there were 104,000 work- inflation-adjusted minimum wage is expected to ers earning minimum wage in British Columbia, increase by 56.9%, from $9.53 in 2010 to an aver- making up 5.1% of the working population. age rate of $14.95 in 2021.2 Defining poverty or “low-income” Notably, despite there being a freeze in the nom- While Canada does not have an official poverty inal minimum wage rate for a decade, the infla- line, Statistics Canada’s low income cut-off tion-adjusted minimum wage rate is expected (LICO) is often used as a proxy for measuring to be 37.9% higher in 2021 than 2002. If the absolute poverty.3 There are other measures of minimum wage had grown since 2002 in line with low income in Canada, namely the low income inflation, the wage rate in 2021 would be $10.84 measure (LIM) and the market basket measure instead of the planned rate of $15.20 in 2021. (MBM). However, the advantage of LICO is that it is closely tied to the share of family income that is used to pay for necessities relative to the Minimum wage fails to give help average. Specifically, a family would be at the targeted at the working poor threshold if it is expected to spend 20 percent- age points more of its family income on neces- To assess the minimum wage as a strategy for sities than the average family. This connection alleviating poverty, it is important to measure how to spending on necessities is important because well the program helps those living in poverty. If poverty is often defined as a lack of adequate British Columbia’s minimum wage earners tend basic necessities to sustain long-term health and not to live in poverty, then many of the poor wellbeing (Lammam and MacIntyre, 2016). would not benefit from the policy and much of the benefit would go instead to those who are not Most workers earning minimum wage in British poor. An anti-poverty policy that does not provide Columbia tend not to live in low-income families help focused on the poor is not an efficient way of Based on data from a special tabulation by providing assistance to those in need. Statistics Canada using the Canadian Income Survey (Statistics Canada, 2018b), in 2015, the This section discusses the latest available data latest year of available income data, 15.7% of on the characteristics of minimum wage earners. minimum wage earners in British Columbia 1 The nominal minimum wage was frozen at $8.00 from November 2001 to May 2011. 2 The average rate for 2021 reflects the fact that for a portion of the year the minimum wage will be $14.60 and after June 1 it will be $15.20. 3 A key distinction between poverty and low income is that poverty is the deprivation of necessities and is not depen- dent on the condition of others, while low income is the relative well-being compared to other members of society. For more discussion, see Lammam and MacIntyre, 2016. fraserinstitute.org FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN 3 Increasing the Minimum Wage in British Columbia: A Flawed Anti-Poverty Policy lived in a low-income family.4 In other words, Most workers earning minimum wage are not 84.3%—or more than four out of five—of British the primary or sole earner in their family Columbia’s minimum wage workers did not live It is certainly counterintuitive that the over- in low income families. whelming majority of British Columbians earning minimum wage do not live in low-income fam- The fact that most British Columbians earning ilies. However, this result begins to make sense minimum wage do not live in low income families once we explore their age and family situation.5 is a critical insight. It helps explain why the two The following data is based on a special tabula- academic studies measuring the effect of raising tion of the Labour Force Survey provided by the minimum wage on poverty in Canada both Statistics Canada (2018c) for 2017, the latest year found that it did not reduce poverty. Campolieti, of data available.6 The data show that most of Gunderson, and Lee (2012) measured the impact those earning minimum wage are not the primary on poverty (using multiple measures of low income or sole income-earner in their family.
Recommended publications
  • December 2015
    Fall 2015 OUR TIME HAS COME TOGETHER, WE CAN HELP ELECT CANADA’S FIRST NDP GOVERNMENT The newsletter of CUPE Alberta Victories for working people Since its election on May 5th, the Notley government has moved on two long standing issues of importance to working Albertans. In June, Jobs, Skills Training and Labour Minister, Lori Sigurdson announced that Alberta would no longer have the lowest minimum wage in Canada. The NDP raised minimum wage from $10.20 to $11.20, and increased the rate for alcohol servers to $10.70. The government also indicated it would fulfill its election promise to raise the minimum wage to $15/hour by 2018 and eliminate the separate wage rate for alcohol servers in 2016. Prior to the increase, which took affect October 1st, Alberta had the lowest minimum wage in Canada. The Notley government is the first jurisdiction in Canada to announce a $15 minimum wage, although several US Cities have already enacted it. Following the minimum wage increase the NDP government introduced legislation in November to include farmworkers in labour law. Prior to the legislation – Alberta was the only remaining province Farmworkers of Alberta, applauded the move, pointing where agricultural workers were not allowed to join out that since every other province had already made unions, were not covered by WCB, and were not these changes, it was long overdue. protected by Employment Standards or Health & Safety “We’re the only jurisdiction in North America and the regulations. In fact, worker deaths on farms could not European Union that has no standards at all.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. These are also available as one exposure on a standard 35mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms international A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 Nortfi Zeeb Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Wage Edmonton 2019
    LIVING WAGE EDMONTON 2019 A report to inform the work to end poverty Acknowledgments in a generation. Thank you to Susan Morrissey, Jenn Rossiter, and Justine Published by: Basilan for their feedback and edits on this report. Edmonton Social Planning Council, #200 -10544 106 ST, This report is published by the Edmonton Social Planning Edmonton, Alberta T5H-2X6 Council. Any errors, omissions, and opinions are strictly those of the authors. For a copy of this report, please visit Prepared by Sandra Ngo www.edmontonsocialplanning.ca Design by Diva Communications Inc. ISBN: 978-0-921417-74-3 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. CONTENTS Introduction _______________________________________________________________________ 4 Changes in 2019 ____________________________________________________________________ 5 Advocacy _____________________________________________________________________________ 6 Methods ___________________________________________________________________________ 7 Sources ___________________________________________________________________________ 10 EDMONTON LIVING WAGE 2019 | 3 INTRODUCTION Why a living wage? A living wage is rooted in the belief that individuals and families should not just survive, but live in dignity, and participate in community. The living wage is defined as the hourly wage that a primary income earner must make to provide for themselves, their families, and reach basic financial security. It allows for a higher standard of living than what is included in the Market Basket Measure, which is based on subsistence living. The living wage includes participation in recreation, an extended health and dental plan, and a minor emergency contingency fund. However, it does not include items that would allow families to “get ahead”, such as putting away savings or paying down debt. This is the fifth year that the Edmonton Social Planning Council has calculated Edmonton’s living wage.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Medicine Hat & District Chamber of Commerce Policy Book
    2018-2019 Policy Book Last Updated: February 2020 With the largest and most influential business organizations locally, provincially and federally, the Chamber network is the most unified, valued and influential business network in Canada and works together to shape policy and programs that will make a difference to businesses in our region. 1 POLICY BOOK 2018- 2019 APPROVED POLICIES FOR THE MEDICINE HAT & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUNICIPAL Municipal Election Policy ........................................................................................................................................................................ Page 6 Approved May 2012, Renewed December 2012, Amended May 2017 Defining a Process for Electorate Information ....................................................................................................................................... Page 7 Approved December 2012, Amended September 2013 Opposition to Land Transfer Tax ............................................................................................................................................................ Page 8 Approved March 2013 Municipal Red Tape Reduction ............................................................................................................................................................ Page 10 Approved March 2013 Tax Equity: Narrowing the Gap Between Residential and Non-Residential Property Taxes ............................................................. Page 13 Approved January 2018 Sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Minimum Wage
    Federal Minimum Wage Issue Paper This paper is one of a series of papers prepared by the Secretariat to the Expert Panel on Modern Federal Labour Standards as background information to stimulate the Panel's discussions. The papers do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government of Canada. January 2019 FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGE ISSUE PAPER ISSUE For more than 20 years, the federal minimum wage has been pegged in the Canada Labour Code to the minimum wage rate in the province or territory in which the employee is usually employed. Should this approach be maintained or should a freestanding federal minimum wage be reinstated? If a freestanding rate were to be adopted, how should it be set, at what level and who should be entitled to it? BACKGROUND The minimum wage is the lowest wage rate that an employer can legally pay its employees and is a core labour standard. The underlying policy intent for establishing minimum wages varies. Governments have historically put them in place with a view to protecting non-unionized workers, reducing the number of low-paying jobs, alleviating poverty, creating incentives to work, addressing inequality and stimulating growth through increased demand. Minimum wages are also set and adjusted in different ways: in legislation or regulations; by the government-of-the-day or an independent board; and based on inflation, average wage rates or other economic factors. The first minimum wage rates were established in Canada in the early 20th century and applied primarily to women and children. Manitoba and British Columbia introduced minimum wage legislation in 1918 and Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan followed suit in 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 160 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JANUARY 9, 2014 No. 5 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was the world, many of them trafficked for This January designated as National called to order by the Speaker pro tem- labor, but increasingly for underaged Slavery and Human Trafficking Pre- pore (Mr. MESSER). girls. For young women, this is a case vention Month is a perfect time to f where they are exploited in this traf- shine a spotlight on the dark issue of ficking as well. trafficking, but awareness is only a DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO Even in my work as chairman of the first step. More needs to be done. TEMPORE Foreign Affairs Committee, I have To that end, I would urge my col- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- learned that human trafficking is no leagues to join me in cosponsoring H.R. fore the House the following commu- longer just a problem ‘‘over there.’’ It 3344, the Fraudulent Overseas Recruit- nication from the Speaker: is a problem in our communities here. ment and Trafficking Elimination Act, It is a problem in developing econo- to combat one critical form of recur- WASHINGTON, DC, ring abuse: namely, that is unscrupu- January 9, 2014. mies, but also it is a problem in the I hereby appoint the Honorable LUKE United States and in Europe. It is a lous recruiters. By targeting the re- MESSER to act as Speaker pro tempore on scourge even in the communities that cruiters we can do a lot—these recruit- this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency?
    canadian tax journal / revue fiscale canadienne (2021) 69:1, 8 7 - 9 8 https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.1.pf.robson Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency? Jennifer Robson and Saul Schwartz* PRÉCIS L’Agence du revenu du Canada (ARC) joue un rôle important dans le versement de prestations aux Canadiens, mais devrait-on élargir ce rôle? La rapidité et la facilité avec lesquelles l’ARC a lancé plusieurs nouvelles prestations de revenu pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 ont suscité la question de savoir si l’Agence devrait assumer un rôle beaucoup plus important en tant qu’organisme de prestations sociales, en plus de celui de percepteur d’impôts. Nous passons en revue les arguments pour et contre cette question, en notant les faiblesses importantes qui entravent déjà le rôle actuel de l’ARC dans le versement des prestations et qui seraient exacerbées si on élargissait ce rôle. Tout compte fait, nous concluons qu’un rôle élargi n’est pas le meilleur choix. Nous suggérons que l’ARC pourrait plutôt consolider l’une de ses forces — la collecte et le partage de renseignements — afin que d’autres organismes puissent administrer plus efficacement les prestations qui ne sont pas directement liées au régime fiscal. ABSTRACT The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) plays an important role in the delivery of benefits to Canadians, but should that role be expanded? The speed and ease with which several new income benefits were launched by theCRA during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted the question of whether the agency should take on a much larger role as a social benefits agency, in addition to tax collector.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximizing Potential Framework for Recovery in a Slow Growth Economy
    Maximizing Potential Framework for Recovery in a Slow Growth Economy A Memorandum to select Cabinet Ministers, the Prime Minister’s Office and the Privy Council Office ARMINE YALNIZYAN, LAURELL RITCHIE, and MARY GELLATLY with input from COLETTE MURPHY, GARIMA TALWAR KAPOOR, MORNA BALLANTYNE, KERRY McCUAIG, and NORA COLE September 4, 2020 SUMMARY Throne Speeches are an opportunity to set a vision and a course for the federal government over the near and long terms. The overlapping economic and public health crises caused by the COVID-19 pandemic make this a challenging task, but also one of great opportunity. The purpose of this memo is to provide input into cabinet deliberations leading to the Speech From The Throne, by presenting a framework for Canada’s recovery from COVID-19. The policy recommendations in this memo meet both immediate term and medium term goals: in the immediate term, to get through the pandemic by minimizing health and economic impacts and leaving no one behind; and in the medium term, by addressing challenges of post-pandemic world (slow growth, population aging) through maximizing human and economic potential. Recovery involves several, overlapping economic issues. There will be an increase in on-demand employment, as happens in the wake of every recession. More workers are and will be struggling with income volatility, and not enough paid work. Households and businesses will face more precarious finances. We are in the midst of a ‘she-cession’ and the low availability of childcare will be a chokepoint of a ‘she-covery.’ Additionally, with an aging population, the federal government will need to invest in children and training, or increase immigration to meet labour market demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Examples of Federal, Provincial and Territorial Programs Child, Family and Other Benefits Connected to Tax Filing
    Some examples of federal, provincial and territorial programs child, family and other benefits connected to tax filing Federal Canada Child Benefit • Up to $6,639 annually ($553.25 per month) tax free for each child under six and $5,602 annually ($466.83 per month) for children age 6 to 17, reduced for income above $31,120. • Payments sent out on the 20th of each month starting in July, along with related additional payments from provinces and territories. Child Disability Benefit • An additional $2,832 annually ($236 monthly), included with monthly CCB, reduced for family income above $67,426. Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) • Up to $10,997 annually (for 2019/20) or $916.38 monthly for low for Seniors income seniors, reduced for individual income over $18,600 and combined income over $25,000 or $45,000 depending on circumstances. • Monthly payments included with Old Age Security (OAS) payments made close to the end of each month. GST Low Income Credit • Up to $443 annually for individuals, $580 for a couple, and $153 for each child, reduced for income over $37,789 • Sent out quarterly, with first payment 5 July, along with related additional payments from provinces and territories. Climate Action Incentive Payments • Up to $444 for an individual, $222 for a spouse and $111 per child for residents of Alberta, with lower amounts for residents of Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario, plus 10% more for residents of small and rural communities. • Payments made with tax returns. Canada Workers Benefit • Up to $1,355 for single individuals and $2,335 for families and an additional $700 for those with disabilities, reduced for income above $12,820 for individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Myths and Facts About the Minimum Wage in BC We Can Avoid the Need for Large One-Time Increases in the Future Simply by Indexing the Minimum Wage to Inflation
    Myths and Facts About the Minimum Wage in BC WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A MINIMUM WAGE earner in British Columbia? It means making $8 per hour — or as little as $6 if you’re getting the so-called “training wage.” If you work full-time, it means paydays that bring in at most $640 — and that’s before deductions. It means seeing your buying power eaten away year after year by rising living costs — BC’s minimum wage has been frozen since 2001, but you pay 2011 prices just like everyone else. And it means living on an annual income that is well below the poverty line for a single person. Back in 2001, BC had the highest minimum wage in Canada. However, other provinces have since made increases, leaving BC at the bottom of the rankings with the lowest minimum wages in the entire country. It is time to raise the minimum wage. And while we are at it, we should take politics out of the equation by developing a clear rationale for how it is set. We propose that a single person working full-time year-round should earn (at least) enough to live above the poverty line. The idea that someone working full-time, full-year should be able to get out of poverty is a clear, transparent policy decision that should determine the minimum wage in BC and in other provinces. Equally important is to legislate regularly scheduled increases tied to inflation, to ensure low-wage workers do not face what amounts to a pay cut as a result of rising prices.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Common Benefits and Credits
    List of common benefits and credits Benefits and refundable tax credits help with your living expenses by adding to your income. Whether you qualify and how much you receive depends on your income which is determined by filing your taxes and on other factors such as your age. The Government of Canada website has a Benefit Finder tool that you can use to help you find the benefits and services that you can receive. See a list of some of the common benefits and credits below. Benefits and credits accessed by tax filing Even if you have no income or do not owe taxes, it is important to keep up to date with filing your taxes. Filing a tax return is the only way to apply to many benefits and credits or to make sure that your payments continue. Here are some of the benefits and refundable tax credits that require tax filing to access or to continue receiving payment: • Canada workers benefit (CWB) and • Home renovation tax credit for seniors and disability supplement persons with disabilities – British Columbia • Canada Education Savings Grant (CESG) only • Canada learning bond (CLB) • New Brunswick’s Seniors’ Home Renovation • Child fitness tax credit – Yukon only Tax Credit – New Brunswick only • Climate action incentive (CAI) • Old age security (OAS) • GST/HST credit • Ontario energy support program (OESP) – Ontario only • GST/HST rebate for employees and partners • Ontario trillium benefit (OTB) – Ontario only • Guaranteed income supplement (GIS) • Refundable medical expense supplement • Other tax credits by province or territory Social assistance programs Each province and territory offer programs that provide financial help to people living on a low income.
    [Show full text]
  • Bold Ideas for State Action
    GETTY/GEORGE ROSE Bold Ideas for State Action By the Center for American Progress May 2018 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Bold Ideas for State Action By the Center for American Progress May 2018 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Economy 17 Education 30 Early childhood 36 Health care 43 Restoring democracy 50 Clean energy and the environment 57 Women and families 64 Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer rights 67 Immigration 72 Criminal justice 79 Gun violence prevention 84 Conclusion 85 Endnotes Introduction and summary The past several decades have not been kind to America’s working families. Costs have skyrocketed while wages remain stagnant. Many of the jobs that have returned in the wake of the Great Recession have often offered lower wages and benefits, leaving Americans without college degrees particularly vulnerable. Fissures in the country are more apparent than ever, as access to opportunity is radically different between communities; the wealthiest grow richer while working families find themselves increasingly strapped. As a result of perpetual underinvestment in infrastructure, education, and other domestic priorities, the future for too many Americans looks increasingly grim, unequal, and uncertain. Federal policies passed or implemented in the past year will largely result in expanded inequality, not in rebuilding the middle class. The new tax law, as pushed by the Trump administration and congressional leadership, gives billions of dollars in tax cuts to companies and the wealthiest Americans instead of providing further support to those who need it most. As was true in the 2000s and more recently in states such as Kansas, showering tax giveaways on the wealthiest individuals and corporations does not create jobs or raise wages.1 Rather, when the baseless promises of economic growth do not materialize, the result is lower revenues and, ultimately, major cuts to critical investments in areas such as schools, infrastructure, and public services.
    [Show full text]