Management Presentation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Management Presentation MANAGEMENT PRESENTATION Rio de Janeiro | June 2013 | AGENDA 1 OGX Overview 2 OGX Portfolio and Execution 3 OGX Operations 4 Financial Overview Appendix Last update: 06/07/2013 1 OGX OVERVIEW OGX OVERVIEW Highly successful and experienced management team, combining unique intellectual capital and superior execution skills Overall exploratory success rate around 80% with important advances in exploration campaign World class E&P portfolio, mostly in shallow waters and onshore (low cost and off-the-shelf technology) Proven execution capability (from concept to oil in an unprecedented timing) with fully established operations comprising more than 6,000 people Solid cash position allows OGX to conduct the largest and most successful private sector exploratory campaign in Brazil and to support production development (more than 100 wells spud since the beginning of its exploratory campaign in Sep. 2009) Brazil‟s historical under-exploration underpins massive growth opportunities for OGX 4 OGX MAIN ACCOMPLISHMENTS 13 blocks acquired during the 11th Bidding Round Sale of a 40% stake in BM-C-39 and BM-C-40 blocks to Petronas New Bond: US$1.1bn raised 1st Oil Bond: US$ US$1.3 bn Beginning of the 5 onshore 2.6bn raised raised through an drilling campaign blocks acquired equity Private in Colombia May/13 Placement Acquisition of 70% 21 blocks acquired stake in the Mar/12 during the 9th Parnaíba Assets Bidding Round Jan/12 May/11 IPO: US$4.1 bn raised Total investments of ~ US$6.1 bn of Jun/10 Drilling Capex and Signature Bonus + OGX Creation Sep/09 ~ US$810 M of Seismic Campaign Survey and interpretation of Aug/09 the 3D seismic data Total cash raised to date: US$9.4 bn Jun/08 Procurement of all equipment and services necessary to Nov/07 Jul/07 initiate the drilling campaign Proven Execution Capability (From Concept To First Oil in Unprecedented Timing) With Fully Established Operations Comprising More Than 6,000 People 5 OGX OWNERSHIP AND CORPORATE STRUCTURE .Average daily traded volume (1 month): 61%¹ 39% Free Float ~ US$130 million . ~ 50 thousand investors .3rd most representative stock in Ibovespa index 5.4% .One of the most liquid Petróleo e Gás Participações S.A. common shares (Market Capitalization (3): ~ US$2 Billion) 99.99% 66.67%4 100.00% Maranhão Petróleo e Petróleo e Gás International Gás S.A. S.A. 100% 23 Blocks 8 Blocks 5 - Campos (100%) (2) 7 - Parnaíba (70%) (2) OGX (2) 2 - Campos (70%) 1 – Parnaíba (50%) (2) Austria 3 - Santos (100%) (2) 3 - Espírito Santo (50%) 5 - PAMA (100%) (2) 5 - Colombia (100%) (2) (1) EBX represented through Centennial Asset Mining Fund LLC (Nevada, USA) (“CAMF”) (2) OGX as operator (3) Market data as of June 5, 2013 (4) MPX S.A. holds 33.33% 6 MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE(1) Luis Carneiro (33) Chief Executive Officer José Roberto Faveret Paulo de Tarso Roberto Monteiro Reinaldo Belotti (34) Armando Ferreira (31) Guimarães (35) Reservoir & Reserves Executive General Counsel Chief Financial Officer Production Officer Exploration Officer Manager Davilson Andrade (20) Dolores Carvalho (35) Joaquim Dib Cohen (32) Olavo Foerch (32) Exploration Campos & ES E&P Laboratory Oil & Gas Commercialization Procurement Celso Martins (34) Marcos Amaral (28) Ricardo Juiniti (27) Onshore Basin Applied Technology Drilling and Completion Ernani Porsche (33) Moacir Santos (38) Billy Pinheiro (30) International Geological Operations Logistics Paulo Otávio Gomes (25) José Sartori (39) Vilmar Barbosa (27) Exploration Santos & PAMA Exploratory Management Production Leandro Leme (31) HSE Highly Successful And Committed Management Team, Combining Unique Intellectual Capital and Superior Execution Skills (1) Parentheses represent years of experience in the E&P industry 7 HIGHLY QUALIFIED EXPLORATION TEAM PBR Success Index Exploratory Team Part of our team led the Petrobras exploration team from 2002 to 2007 Success index in excess of 60% on average offshore Brazil from 2002-2007 whilst at Petrobras Over 9 billion boe and more than 50 new fields discovered Proven Track Record Having Opened Several New Oil Frontiers, Including The Pre-salt, and Discovering Over 50 New Oil Fields 8 BRAZIL Vast Untapped Oil & Gas Potential Largest Oil And Gas New Provinces Could Propel Brazil Into Still Significantly Under-explored Discoveries In The World Top Reserves Holders Oil and Gas Discovered Volumes Oil Resources - December 2009 (Bn bbl) % of sedimentary basins under concession + 35 bn boe 2000 – 2010 (Bn boe) Licensed Saudi Arabia 4% Brazil 265 Venezuela Turkmenistan 172 Iran Iran 138 Kazakhstan Iraq 115 Unlicensed China Kuwait 102 Unlicensed96% 96% Russia Brazil post Tupi 100 Source: ANP Australia UAE 98 Kuwait Russia 74 Oil & Gas in The World Israel Libya 44 HISTORICAL O&G COUNTRY Saudi Arabia Kazakhstan 40 PROD.(BN BOE) India Nigeria 37 USA (1900-2010) 440 Indonesia Canada 33 Venezuela EX-USSR US 28 335 (1900-2010) Papua Qatar 27 SAUDI ARABIA New Guinea 145 Bn Boe China 15 (1938-2010) Ghana Angola 14 BRAZIL 14.5 0 10 20 30 40 Brazil 13 (1941-2010) Source: IHS Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2010 Source: EIA-DOE, BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2010, Saudi & analyst estimates Aramco, UPPSALA University, Petrobras, ANP and OGX analysis Brazil’s Historical Under-Exploration Underpins Massive Growth Opportunities for OGX 9 2 OGX PORTFOLIO AND EXECUTION OGX PORTFOLIO 31 blocks: 26 blocks in 5 Brazilian sedimentary basins and 5 onshore blocks in 2 Colombian sedimentary basins Unique portfolio with 10.8 billion potential recoverable barrels of oil equivalent (boer) OGX‟s business plan is based on 4.1 billion barrels already discovered in the shallow waters of the Campos Basin PORTFOLIO 11 OGX PORTFOLIO POTENTIAL Breakdown Oil discoveries of 4.1 bn bbl are already under production development in the shallow waters of Campos Basin D&M Certified Volumes (Bnboe) Portfolio Breakdown 19% 10.8 Onshore 73% 8% Shallow Deep Water Water 6.5 6.7¹ C1 (4%) 4.8 0.1 C2 1.3 (19%) C3 0.6 (77%) 3.0 2.3 21% Gas Mar-08 Sep-09 Dec-10 79% Oil Contingent Delineation Prospective Note: 1 Does not include Parnaíba 3C contingent resources of 141 million boe 12 CAMPOS BASIN Low Risk, Shallow Water And Large Volumes Campos Basin ~400 MM bbl already declared commercial (Tubarão Azul and Tubarão Martelo Fields) 7 blocks operated by OGX Total area of 1,035 km2 Average water depth of ~120m 73 wells drilled ~90% of success rate OGX’s Discovered Accumulations Confirm a New Hydrocarbon Province in the Southern Campos Basin 13 CAMPOS BASIN Areas Update– Not including pre-salt and exploratory prospects Waimea / Pipeline and Vesuvio Complexes Waikiki Complex Highlights Successful appraisal campaign with 40 wells drilled and a 87% hit ratio Acquisition of incremental 20% participation of blocks BM-C-37 and BM-C-38 from Maersk, with OGX becoming the operator Declaration of Commerciality of the Waikiki accumulation and Development Plan (DP) submitted to the ANP . Named as Tubarão Martelo Field with expected total recoverable volume of 285 MMbbl Declaration of Commerciality for a portion of the Waimea Complex and Development Plan (DP) submitted to the ANP . Named as Tubarão Azul Field with expected total recoverable volume of 110 MMbbl New discoveries in the 1H12: Itacoatiara and Honolulu Source: Area estimates based exclusively on OGX‟s studies 14 CAMPOS BASIN Waimea Complex – Not including pre-salt and exploratory prospects Waimea Complex¹ TUBARÃO AZUL FIELD (1ST MODULE) OSORNO OGX-31 Albian: 48m OGX-3 Albian: 80m N.A. Aptian/Barrem: 50m N.A. Aptian: 23m OGX-21D/OGX-26HP Albian: 14m OGX-73 Albian: 37m N.A. N.A. OGX-50D/OGX-55HP Santonian: 1,7m CHIMBORAZO 1C Albian: 52m OGX-33 Albian: 42m N.A. OGX-53D/OGX-60HP Albian: 71m 1C OGX-65D/OGX-68HP Albian: 97m 1C TAMBORA OGX-52 Santonian: 5m N.A. FUJI Albian: 96m OGX-8 Albian: 43m N.A. OGX-58DP - N.A. Aptian: 44m OGX-75 Albian: 49m N.A. OGX-56D Albian: 60m 3C OGX-81 Albian: 62m N.A. OGX-69 Albian: 38m 3C ILLIMANI OGX-28D Albian: 24m N.A. WELL UNDER EVALUATION OGX-43D Albian: 50m Del. OGX-54 Albian: 24m Del. OGX-61 Albian: 9m 3C TUPUNGATO OGX-20 Maastrich: 9m & 3m N.A. Albian: 50m Aptian: 42m Note: Source: 1 Figures in “meters” illustrate net pays of oil columns Area estimates based exclusively on OGX‟s studies 2 Discovered after D&M „s Dec 2010 contingent resources report 15 CAMPOS BASIN Waikiki Complex – Not including pre-salt and exploratory prospects Waikiki Complex¹ TUBARÃO MARTELO FIELD WELLS UNDER EVALUATION OGX-25 Eocene: 8m (gas) OGX-45D Maastrich: 5m Del. N.A. Albocenomaniano: 145m OGX-29/32 Oil Shows N.A. OGX-35D Albocenomanian: 80m 3C OGX-41D/ Albian: 92m 2C OGX-44HP PERÓ OGX-14 Albian: 35m & 27m N.A. OGX-76² Albian: 6m 2C INGÁ OGX-18 Santonian: Oil Shows Albian: 12m (oil column) N.A. OGX-62 Albocenomanian: 20m 2C Santonian: 26m OGX-64DP Santonian: 23m 3C OGX-67 - 3C OGX-71 - 3C ITACOATIARA OGX-79 Albian: 64m N.A. Source: Notes: Area estimates based exclusively on OGX‟s studies 1 Figures in “meters” illustrate net pays of oil columns 16 CAMPOS BASIN Pipeline Complex – Not including pre-salt and exploratory prospects Pipeline Complex¹ PIPELINE CARAMBOLA A (PIPELINE) OGX-2A Eocene: Oil shows MRK-3 Santonian: 14m Cretac: Oil shows Albian: 43m N.A. Albian: 100m N.A. Aptian: 12m Aptian: 50m Barremian: 15m CARAMBOLA OGX-36D/ Albian: 60m MRK-5 Albian: 17m N.A. 3C OGX-39HP RJS-105² Albian: 150m N.A. OGX-40D Albian: 107m 2C OGX-42D Eocene: 6m 3C Albian: 82m OGX-48 Albian: 12m 3C OGX-70 - 3C OGX-72 Albian: 129m 3C OGX-80³ Albian: 51m N.A.
Recommended publications
  • Best Research Support and Anti-Plagiarism Services and Training
    CleanScript Group – best research support and anti-plagiarism services and training List of oil field acronyms The oil and gas industry uses many jargons, acronyms and abbreviations. Obviously, this list is not anywhere near exhaustive or definitive, but this should be the most comprehensive list anywhere. Mostly coming from user contributions, it is contextual and is meant for indicative purposes only. It should not be relied upon for anything but general information. # 2D - Two dimensional (geophysics) 2P - Proved and Probable Reserves 3C - Three components seismic acquisition (x,y and z) 3D - Three dimensional (geophysics) 3DATW - 3 Dimension All The Way 3P - Proved, Probable and Possible Reserves 4D - Multiple Three dimensional's overlapping each other (geophysics) 7P - Prior Preparation and Precaution Prevents Piss Poor Performance, also Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance A A&D - Acquisition & Divestment AADE - American Association of Drilling Engineers [1] AAPG - American Association of Petroleum Geologists[2] AAODC - American Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors (obsolete; superseded by IADC) AAR - After Action Review (What went right/wrong, dif next time) AAV - Annulus Access Valve ABAN - Abandonment, (also as AB) ABCM - Activity Based Costing Model AbEx - Abandonment Expense ACHE - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger ACOU - Acoustic ACQ - Annual Contract Quantity (in reference to gas sales) ACQU - Acquisition Log ACV - Approved/Authorized Contract Value AD - Assistant Driller ADE - Asphaltene
    [Show full text]
  • Drill Stem Test Database (UBDST) and Documentation: Analysis of Uinta Basin, Utah Gas-Bearing Cretaceous and Tertiary Strata
    Principal drill stem test database (UBDST) and documentation: analysis of Uinta Basin, Utah gas-bearing Cretaceous and Tertiary strata by J. Ben Wesley, Craig J. Wandrey, and Thomas D. Fouchl U.S. Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO Open-File 93-193 Work Performed under contract No.: DE-AI21-83MC2042 for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy Morgantown Energy Technology Center, Morgantown, West Virginia This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards, (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code.) Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this program has been used by the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy and functioning of the program and related program material, nor shall the fact of distrubution constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the USGS in connection therewith. 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225 Introduction................................................................................................................2 METHODS ......................................................................................................................5 Data Base Structure.....................................................................................5 Drill Stem Tests.........................................................................................................?
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Oilfield Production Terminology (GOT) (DEFINITIONS and ABBREVIATIONS)
    Glossary of Oilfield Production Terminology (GOT) (DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS) FIRST EDITION, JANUARY 1, 1988 American Petroleum Institute 1220 L Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005 Issued by AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE Production Department FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING TECHNICAL CONTENTS OF THIS PUBLICATION CONTACT THE API PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT, 2535 ONE MAIN PLACE, DALLAS, TX 75202-3904 – (214) 748-3841. SEE BACK SIDE FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING HOW TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION. Users of this publication should become familiar with its scope and content. This publication is intended to supplement rather than replace individual engineering judgment. OFFICIAL PUBLICATION REG U.S. PATENT OFFICE Copyright 1988 American Petroleum Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 2 SECTION 1: LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 3 SECTION 2: ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS 5 FOREWORD A. This publication is under the jurisdiction of the API Executive Committee on Standardization of Oilfield Equipment and Materials. B. The purpose of this publication is to provide standards writing groups access to previously used abbreviations and definitions. Standards writing groups are encouraged to adopt, when possible, the definitions found herein. Attention Users of this Publication: Portions of this publication have been changed from the previous edition. The location of changes has been marked with a bar in the margin. In some cases the changes are significant, while in other cases the changes reflect minor editorial adjustments. The bar notations in the margins are provided as an aid to users to identify those parts of this publication that have been changed from the previous edition, but API makes no warranty as to the accuracy of such bar notations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form Year Ended December 31, 2017 March 23, 2018
    Annual Information Form Year Ended December 31, 2017 March 23, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL MATTERS ................................................................................................................................ 1 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements ..................................................................... 1 Reserves and Resources Advisory ........................................................................................................... 3 Currency .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................... 5 CORPORATE STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ................................................................................... 6 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Corporate History and License Areas ...................................................................................................... 7 Corporate Social Responsibility ............................................................................................................ 11 Environmental and Safety Matters .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overpressure and Petroleum Generation and Accumulation in the Dongying Depression of the Bohaiwan Basin, China
    Geofluids (2001) 1, 257–271 Overpressure and petroleum generation and accumulation in the Dongying Depression of the Bohaiwan Basin, China X. XIE1,2,C.M.BETHKE2 ,S.LI1 ,X.LIU1 AND H. ZHENG3 1Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; 2Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; 3Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Shenli Oil Corporation, Dongying, Shandong, China ABSTRACT The occurrence of abnormally high formation pressures in the Dongying Depression of the Bohaiwan Basin, a prolific oil-producing province in China, is controlled by rapid sedimentation and the distribution of centres of active petro- leum generation. Abnormally high pressures, demonstrated by drill stem test (DST) and well log data, occur in the third and fourth members (Es3 and Es4) of the Eocene Shahejie Formation. Pressure gradients in these members com- monly fall in the range 0.012–0.016 MPa mÀ1, although gradients as high as 0.018 MPa mÀ1 have been encountered. The zone of strongest overpressuring coincides with the areas in the central basin where the principal lacustrine source rocks, which comprise types I and II kerogen and have a high organic carbon content (>2%, ranging to 7.3%), are actively generating petroleum at the present day. The magnitude of overpressuring is related not only to the burial depth of the source rocks, but to the types of kerogen they contain. In the central basin, the pressure gradient within submember Es32, which contains predominantly type II kerogen, falls in the range 0.013–0.014 MPa mÀ1. Larger gra- dients of 0.014–0.016 MPa mÀ1 occur in submember Es33 and member Es4, which contain mixed type I and II kero- gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Deepwater for the Future Conference Program
    Conference Program 29–31 October 2019 SulAmérica Convention Center Rio de Janeiro, Brazil go.otcbrasil.org/offshoreinnovation Strengthening Deepwater for the Future OTC Brasil 2019 Theme A4 2019-09-27.indd 1 9/27/19 12:05 PM Conference Information OTC Organizations Sponsoring Organizations American Association of Petroleum Geologists American Institute of Chemical Engineers American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers American Society of Civil Engineers American Society of Mechanical Engineers Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Oceanic Engineering Society CM Marine Technology Society Society of Exploration Geophysicists Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration SNAME Society of Petroleum Engineers The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society Regional Sponsoring Organization Brazilian Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels Institute Endorsing Organizations International Association of Petroleum Equipment Suppliers Association Drilling Contractors About the Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) About the Brazilian Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels Institute (IBP) OTC is where energy professionals meet to Founded in 1957, IBP is a private, non-profit organization focused on exchange ideas and opinions to advance scientific promoting the development of Brazilian oil, gas and biofuels industry in a and technical knowledge for offshore resources competitive, sustainable, ethical and socially responsible environment. Today, and environmental matters. Founded in 1969, IBP gathers more than 200 companies’ members, and it is recognized as an OTC’s flagship conference is held annually at NRG Park in Houston. important industry representative for its technical knowledge and for fostering the related to its biggest OTC has expanded technically and globally with the Arctic Technology issues. Organizer of the main oil and gas events in Brazil, such as Rio Oil & Gas and OTC Brasil, IBP Conference, OTC Brasil, and OTC Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • AOG V15-15 26July.Pdf
    Vol. 15 Issue 15 26 July 2012 AFRICA OILANDGAS BREAKING NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM AFRICA Total prepares to hand out Moho Nord TLP The award of the initial tension leg platform contract for to be submitted in early August. Total’s US $8 Bn Moho Nord project off Congo Brazzaville is Bidders believe Total is looking for the cheapest price possi- expected any day now, with only two consortia left vying for ble as it has set the hull at only shipbuilding specification with the deal. no further specific requirements. The groups, led by old rivals While DSME, HHI and Samsung Samsung Heavy Industries (SHI) and Heavy are leading the way for the Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI), are topsides, the hull specifications mean going to the wire after the FloaTEC Chinese yards are also involved here. and Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine The full FPU contract is expected Engineering (DSME) groups were to be awarded around the same time eliminated. HHI had been expected to as the TLP contract and winning one be favourite for the deal because of its may provide some help in the contest long history with Total and its alliance for the second. Being awarded the with French firm Doris which worked FEED for the TLP is also likely to on the pre-FEED. However, AOG help with winning the full engin- understands that the Samsung bid ori- eering contract. HHI also won the ginally came in cheaper and HHI $410m contract for the FPU for the revised its offer after clarification original Moho project back in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Hydrologic Testing in Tertiary Limestone Aquifer, Tenneco Offshore Exploratory Well Atlantic OCS, Lease- Block 427 (Jacksonville NH 17-5)
    Summary of Hydrologic Testing in Tertiary Limestone Aquifer, Tenneco Offshore Exploratory Well Atlantic OCS, Lease- Block 427 (Jacksonville NH 17-5) United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2180 Summary of Hydrologic Testing in Tertiary Limestone Aquifer, Tenneco Offshore Exploratory Well Atlantic OCS, Lease- Block 427 (Jacksonville NH 17-5) By RICHARD H. JOHNSTON, PETER W. BUSH, RICHARD E. KRAUSE, JAMES A. MILLER, and CRAIG L. SPRINKLE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2180 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1982 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data United States Geological Survey Summary of hydrologic testing in Tertiary limestone aquifer, Tenneco offshore exploratory well-Atlantic OCS, lease-block 427 (Jacksonville NH 17-5). (Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2180) Supt. of Docs. no. I 19.13:2180 1. Aquifers Atlantic coast (United States) 2. Saltwater encroachment Atlantic coast (United States) 3. Tenneco Inc. I. Johnston, Richard H. II. Title. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2180. GB1199.2U54 1981 553'.79'09759 80-606901 AACR1 CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Geologic setting 3 Drill-stem test 3 Procedures 3 Theoretical analysis 5 Results 6 Ground-water chemistry 8 Sampling procedures and analytical results 9 Discussion of analytical results 9 Regional implications offshore location of freshwater-saltwater interface and saltwater intrusion potential 10 Suggestions for conducting drill-stem tests to obtain hydrologic data in exploratory oil wells 12 Selected references 14 FIGURES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2009 Martin Kennedy Permeability.Pdf
    Permeability in the Eye of the Beholder Martin Kennedy FESAus and SPE Lecture Tour 2009 Contents • Definitions • Fundamentals • Measurements • Estimation • Reconciliation Definitions COMPLEXITY Single phase Gas Single Phase Gas Reservoir Fluids ‘Ambient’ (Kair) Overburden/Reservoir Pressure(kinf) keff/krel Thin Section Directional Properties Probe kmax Core Plug k90 Whole Core SCALE WFT kv Well Test EWT Characteristics • Permeability • Porosity – Dimensions L2 – Dimensionless – 10-14 to 10+>7 mD – 0 to 0.5 – Tensor (Anisotropic) – Scalar (Isotropic) • Resistivity, acoustic • density, neutron properties capture – Dominated by largest – All pores contribute pores equally 1 D = 0.99 um2 Permeability and Fluid Flow A Q = Δp.a4 8Δl.μ = kAΔp Δl.μ k = a4 So… 8A Δl Porosity-Permeability (Capillary Bundles) Permeability-Porosity 10000 1000 100 1mm tubes D 0.1mm tubes k/m 0.01mm tubes 10 Permeability-Pore Size 10000 1 1000 0.1 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 100 D tube pore 3% porosity porosity k/m tube pore 30% por 10 1 0.1 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 pore diameter/m Fracture Permeability Q = Δp.h.w3 Flow through a slot A 12Δl.μ = kAΔp permeability equation Δl.μ w 3 h k = h.w 12A Δl kif = w2 Intrinsic permeability of a fracture 12 Permeability Controls in Real Rocks Field A Field B Realisations of SEM Images from the Plover sands in the Browse Basin. (2mmx2mm). Although coarser grained, the B sand has fewer paths that are more tortuous. Porosity = 0.18 Porosity = 0.16 Kh = 470mD Kh = 2 mD Pore network models constructed from the SEM images Measurement • Fluid has to move… – Laboratory – Test (including WFT) • Uncertainty and Errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Drill Stem Testing
    EXP_DST 20p_A4_new 06/04/2017 13:40 Page 1 Drill Stem Testing www.exprogroup.com EXP_DST 20p_A4_new 06/04/2017 13:40 Page 2 The accurate data we provide from every drill stem test allows our customers to plan the optimal exploitation of their reservoirs. More than successfully completed 500 DST jobs In more than 20 countries clients including For more than leading IOCs, NOCs 50 and independents 2 EXP_DST 20p_A4_new 06/04/2017 13:40 Page 3 Drill Stem Testing Expro offers the complete well test package, utilising some of the industry’s most reliable technologies. We have invested in our infrastructure and people to enhance our global capabilities in all the key exploration and appraisal markets where we operate. A drill stem test (DST) offers the fastest and safest method of evaluating the potential of a newly-discovered hydrocarbon-bearing formation. After the well has been drilled and cased, the first stage of a well test is to run a DST string in conjunction with a downhole data system with the option to include tubing conveyed sampling and tubing conveyed perforating systems. Expro’s DST Heritage Expro acquires Exal , a UK based downhole data and fluids sampling company Baker Hughes introduce the Expro DST services first universal cased hole 15k Expro acquires PowerWell established in all major DST tool string Geoservices acquires Services, incorporating geographic regions 15k DST tool assets Geoservices DST and Petrotech, from Baker Hughes performing specialised fluids along with design sampling and metering authority 2009 1993 1987 2013 2000 2006 1994 Expro establishes a DST Expro makes technology product/service line and purchase from Flight commits $50M for Refuelling Ltd to develop Expro acquires Tripoint associated R&D and growth cableless telemetry systems capital (CaTS™) under Expro – Inc., a North American TCP Wireless Well Solutions completions company based in Broussard LA.
    [Show full text]
  • [5 April, 2016] Declaration Premier Oil and Gas Services Limited
    MERRILL CORPORATION INEWLAN//29-MAR-16 09:28 DISK121:[16ZAQ1.16ZAQ16201]CS16201A.;15 mrll_0915.fmt Free: 60DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ Seq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;134 6 C Cs: 11645 RISC (UK) LIMITED [5 April, 2016] Declaration Premier Oil and Gas Services Limited (‘‘Premier’’) has commissioned RISC (UK) Ltd (‘‘RISC’’) to provide an independent valuation of the Reserves and a review of the Contingent and Prospective Resources of E.On E & P UK Limited and E.On E & P UK EU Limited (‘‘E.On’’) to form a Competent Person’s Report. The assessment of petroleum assets is subject to uncertainty because it involves judgments on many variables that cannot be precisely assessed, including reserves, future oil and gas production rates, the costs associated with producing these volumes, access to product markets, product prices and the potential impact of fiscal/regulatory changes. The statements and opinions attributable to RISC are given in good faith and in the belief that such statements are neither false nor misleading. In carrying out its tasks, RISC has considered and relied upon information obtained from a data room as well as information in the public domain. The information provided to RISC has included both hard copy and electronic information supplemented with discussions between RISC and key Premier staff. Whilst every effort has been made to verify data and resolve apparent inconsistencies, neither RISC nor its servants accept any liability for its accuracy, nor do we warrant that our enquiries have revealed all of the matters, which an extensive examination may disclose.
    [Show full text]
  • Directive PNG013: Well Data Submission Requirements
    Well Data Submission Requirements Directive PNG013 October 12, 2016 Version 1.0 Governing Legislation: Act: The Oil and Gas Conservation Act Regulation: The Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations, 2012 Order: 194/16 Well Data Submission Requirements Record of Change Version Date Author Description 1.0 October 12, 2016 Thomas Schmidt Initial Approved Version authorized by Minister’s Order 194-16 October 2016 Page 2 of 31 Well Data Submission Requirements Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................6 2 Definitions ..................................................................................................................................6 3 Legislation and Compliance .........................................................................................................8 3.1 Governing Legislation .................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Compliance and Enforcement ....................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Licensees’ Responsibilities ............................................................................................................ 9 4 Reporting Structured Data and Submission of Supporting Documentation ................................. 10 4.1 IRIS Reporting Timelines.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]