[5 April, 2016] Declaration Premier Oil and Gas Services Limited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[5 April, 2016] Declaration Premier Oil and Gas Services Limited MERRILL CORPORATION INEWLAN//29-MAR-16 09:28 DISK121:[16ZAQ1.16ZAQ16201]CS16201A.;15 mrll_0915.fmt Free: 60DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ Seq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;134 6 C Cs: 11645 RISC (UK) LIMITED [5 April, 2016] Declaration Premier Oil and Gas Services Limited (‘‘Premier’’) has commissioned RISC (UK) Ltd (‘‘RISC’’) to provide an independent valuation of the Reserves and a review of the Contingent and Prospective Resources of E.On E & P UK Limited and E.On E & P UK EU Limited (‘‘E.On’’) to form a Competent Person’s Report. The assessment of petroleum assets is subject to uncertainty because it involves judgments on many variables that cannot be precisely assessed, including reserves, future oil and gas production rates, the costs associated with producing these volumes, access to product markets, product prices and the potential impact of fiscal/regulatory changes. The statements and opinions attributable to RISC are given in good faith and in the belief that such statements are neither false nor misleading. In carrying out its tasks, RISC has considered and relied upon information obtained from a data room as well as information in the public domain. The information provided to RISC has included both hard copy and electronic information supplemented with discussions between RISC and key Premier staff. Whilst every effort has been made to verify data and resolve apparent inconsistencies, neither RISC nor its servants accept any liability for its accuracy, nor do we warrant that our enquiries have revealed all of the matters, which an extensive examination may disclose. In particular, we have not independently verified property title, encumbrances, regulations that apply to this asset(s). RISC has also not audited the opening balances at the valuation date of past recovered and unrecovered development and exploration costs, undepreciated past development costs and tax losses. We believe our review and conclusions are sound but no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given to our conclusions. RISC has no pecuniary interest, other than to the extent of the professional fees receivable for the preparation of this report, or other interest in the assets evaluated, that could reasonably be regarded as affecting our ability to give an unbiased view of these assets. Our review was carried out only for the purpose referred to above and may not have relevance in other contexts. Confidentiality The information contained in this document is strictly confidential. Premier agrees not to appropriate, copy or in any other manner reproduce or otherwise disclose any of the information contained in this document to any other person (other than the employees or servants of Premier acting in the course of their employment) without RISC’s express written consent. At the request of Premier, RISC has consented to the disclosure of this document to the London Stock Exchange (‘‘Recipients’’) provided that in consideration of RISC’s consent to the disclosure, the Client and Recipients acknowledge and agree that: • The Client indemnifies RISC from all claims, losses, liabilities, expenses or damages arising from a claim by the Recipient or any other third party in connection with the RISC advice • This document does not address the Recipient’s particular circumstances or requirements. The Recipient may not rely on the document for any purpose whatever. • RISC assumes no responsibility to the Recipient to update this document for anything that occurs, or of which becomes aware, following the release of the document to the Client • The Recipient must keep this document confidential and agrees not to appropriate, copy or in any other manner reproduce or otherwise disclose any of the information contained in this document to any other person or organization. • Neither RISC nor any employee, agent or contractor of RISC is liable to the Recipient or any other person in respect of any cause of action, including negligence, arising in connection with the contents of the document and the Recipient must not make any claim or commence or pursue any proceedings against RISC, or any employee, agent or contractor of RISC in respect of any cause of action arising in connection with the contents of the document. 35 Project Eva Class 1 Circular Proj: P5862LON16 Job: 16ZAQ16201 (16-5862-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750⍯ Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CS16201A.;15 v6.8 MERRILL CORPORATION KSEAMON// 3-APR-16 10:38 DISK121:[16ZAQ1.16ZAQ16201]CU16201A.;20 mrll_0915.fmt Free: 440DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;134 6 C Cs: 42675 If Premier or Recipient do not agree to the above terms, RISC withholds its consent to the disclosure of the document by the client to Recipients. RISC (UK) Limited Premier Oil and Gas Services Limited Rex House, 23 Lower Belgrade St, 4-12 Regent Street London SW1W 0NR London. SW1Y 4PE United Kingdom United Kingdom Copyright This document is protected by copyright laws and is intended for the use of the Premier only. Any unauthorised reproduction or distribution of the document or any portion of it may entitle a claim for damages. Document control Client Name Premier Oil Client Representative Steve York and Kate Arman RISC Coordinator . Gavin Ward RISC Job # 15.0092 Client Order CORP2015X-00003 Approvals Name Signature Date Dean Baker 14 March 2016 Prepared By Adam Borushek 28 March 2016 Prepared By Simon Douse 14 March 2016 Prepared By Michael O’Hare 12 January 2016 Prepared By Linda Stasiuk 12 January 2016 Prepared By Peter Stephenson 4 February 2016 Prepared By Gavin Ward 4 February 2016 Prepared By Simon Whitaker 4 February 2016 Peer Review By Geoff Barker 13 January 2016 Geoff Salter 4 February 2016 Peter Stephenson 6 February 2016 Geoff Salter 8 February 2016 Geoff Salter 10 February 2016 Editorial Review By Gavin Ward 30 March 2016 Authorised For Release By Gavin Ward 30 March 2016 Revision History Revision Date Description Checked by Approved by #1 8-Feb-2016 Final review by G.Salter ...................... G.Ward G.Ward #2 10-Feb-2016 Update to price assumptions ................... G.Ward G.Ward #3 17-Feb-2016 Amend text & charts ........................ G.Ward G.Ward #4 25-Feb-2016 Add Reserves & NPV @ 31 Dec 2015 ............ G.Ward G.Ward #5 14-Mar-2016 Add valuation of pipelines ..................... G.Ward G.Ward #6 24-Mar-2016 Correction to reservoir ages in notes ............. G.Ward G.Ward #7 30-Mar-2016 Amend title and date on title page .............. G.Ward G.Ward 36 Project Eva Class 1 Circular Proj: P5862LON16 Job: 16ZAQ16201 (16-5862-1) Page Dim: 8.250 X 11.750⍯ Copy Dim: 38. X 62. File: CU16201A.;20 v6.8 MERRILL CORPORATION KSEAMON// 3-APR-16 10:10 DISK121:[16ZAQ1.16ZAQ16201]CW16201A.;25 mrll_0915.fmt Free: 20D*/120D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ RSeq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;134 6 C Cs: 58745 Table of contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................... 42 1.1. Production Assets and Reserves ........................................... 46 1.2. Processing Terminals and Pipelines ......................................... 52 1.3. Contingent Resources ................................................... 53 1.4. Exploration Potential ................................................... 53 1.5. Opportunities and Risks ................................................. 54 2. Basis of Assessment ....................................................... 54 2.1. Data Availability and Methodology ......................................... 54 2.2. Qualifications ......................................................... 54 2.3. Limitations .......................................................... 55 2.4. Independence ........................................................ 55 2.5. Standard ............................................................ 55 2.6. Consent ............................................................. 56 3. Production Assets ........................................................ 56 3.1. Southern North Sea Regional Geology ...................................... 56 3.1.1. Source Rocks ...................................................... 57 3.1.2. Reservoirs ........................................................ 58 3.1.3. Traps ............................................................ 58 3.2. Babbage Gas Field, Block 48/2a (Licence P.456) ................................ 58 3.2.1. Overview ......................................................... 58 3.2.2. Development and current status ........................................ 59 3.2.3. Reservoir description and In Place Volumes ................................ 60 3.2.4. Reservoir Performance and Production Forecasts ............................ 62 3.2.5. Future Development and Costs ......................................... 66 3.2.6. Reserves ......................................................... 68 3.2.7. Contingent Resources ................................................ 68 3.3. Caister Murdoch System and Quadrant 44 Area ................................ 68 3.3.1. Overview ......................................................... 68 3.4. Caister Gas-Condensate Field, block 44/23a (Licence P.452) ....................... 70 3.4.1. Overview ......................................................... 70 3.4.2. Development and Current Status ........................................ 70 3.4.3. Reservoir Description and In Place Volumes ............................... 70 3.4.4. Reservoir Performance and Production Forecasts ............................ 71 3.4.5. Future
Recommended publications
  • Why Mandatory Disclosures Matter for Indonesia Disclosures Matter for Indonesia
    Case Study Why mandatory Why mandatory disclosures matter for Indonesia disclosures matter for Indonesia MELIANA LUMBANTORUAN PWYP INDONESIA CONTEXT PROJECT ACTIVITIES The global transparency wave has reached Indonesia. This project used companies’ mandatory disclosure Initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency from 2014 and 2015, published by companies listed on Initiative (EITI) are bringing more transparency to EU and Norwegian stock exchanges. Through that we Indonesia and the mandatory disclosures laws of the EU found that at least seven of these companies operate in have led to more data on extractive activities in Indonesia Indonesia, i.e. Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum (BP), becoming available. But the oil, mining and gas industries BHP Billiton, Premier Oil, TOTAL Oil, the Jardine Matheson are still among the most corrupt sectors and accessing / PT. Astra International Tbk. Their reports were used to relevant data on the amount of production, marketing, find how much was paid by them in 2014 and 2015. Beyond shipment and payment of taxes and other company payments data, we also looked at what other kind of financial liabilities is difficult. information related to the extractive sector are difficult to get in Indonesia. In Indonesia, ranked 90th out of 176 in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index 2016, the data from the three EITI reports published so far (between 2009 Table 1 The total value of VALUE OF YEAR (USD) and 2013) is incomplete and out of date. Disclosing data payments disclosure by seven EU companies to COMPANY NAME 2014 2015 will therefore not be enough to ensure accountability. Indonesia’s government The data also needs to used in a meaningful way by a (2014-2015) Statoil 5,158,730 (8,101,737) range of stakeholders, including civil society.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2000 www.premier-oil.com 01 HIGHLIGHTS 26 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 02 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 28 REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS 04 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW 30 REMUNERATION REPORT 06 OPERATIONAL REVIEW: 34 STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES 08 Indonesia, Pakistan 34 AUDITORS REPORT 10 West Natuna case study 12 Myanmar, North West Europe, Albania 35 ACCOUNTING POLICIES 14 Yetagun case study 37 CONSOLIDATED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 16 FINANCIAL REVIEW 37 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF TOTAL 20 TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS RECOGNISED GAINS AND LOSSES 23 HEALTH & SAFETY 37 GROUP RECONCILIATION OF MOVEMENT IN SHAREHOLDERS’ FUNDS 24 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 38 BALANCE SHEETS 39 CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT 40 NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 58 FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 58 SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION 59 RESERVES 60 LICENCE INTERESTS bcf billion cubic feet boe barrels of oil equivalent boepd barrels of oil equivalent per day bopd barrels of oil per day bpd barrels per day EWT extended well test LIBOR London Inter Bank Offer Rate mboepd thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day mmbbls million barrels mmboe million barrels of oil equivalent mmscfd million standard cubic feet per day NGLs natural gas liquids NGOs Non-Government Organisations tcf trillion cubic feet HIGHLIGHTS IMPROVED FINANCIAL POSITION • Turnover increased by £26.2 million to £115.7 million • Operating profit of £35.2 million for the year • Net profit after tax of £6.1 million • Revolving bank facility successfully re-financed at $250 million MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS ON TRACK • Myanmar – operated $650
    [Show full text]
  • Best Research Support and Anti-Plagiarism Services and Training
    CleanScript Group – best research support and anti-plagiarism services and training List of oil field acronyms The oil and gas industry uses many jargons, acronyms and abbreviations. Obviously, this list is not anywhere near exhaustive or definitive, but this should be the most comprehensive list anywhere. Mostly coming from user contributions, it is contextual and is meant for indicative purposes only. It should not be relied upon for anything but general information. # 2D - Two dimensional (geophysics) 2P - Proved and Probable Reserves 3C - Three components seismic acquisition (x,y and z) 3D - Three dimensional (geophysics) 3DATW - 3 Dimension All The Way 3P - Proved, Probable and Possible Reserves 4D - Multiple Three dimensional's overlapping each other (geophysics) 7P - Prior Preparation and Precaution Prevents Piss Poor Performance, also Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance A A&D - Acquisition & Divestment AADE - American Association of Drilling Engineers [1] AAPG - American Association of Petroleum Geologists[2] AAODC - American Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors (obsolete; superseded by IADC) AAR - After Action Review (What went right/wrong, dif next time) AAV - Annulus Access Valve ABAN - Abandonment, (also as AB) ABCM - Activity Based Costing Model AbEx - Abandonment Expense ACHE - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger ACOU - Acoustic ACQ - Annual Contract Quantity (in reference to gas sales) ACQU - Acquisition Log ACV - Approved/Authorized Contract Value AD - Assistant Driller ADE - Asphaltene
    [Show full text]
  • Drill Stem Test Database (UBDST) and Documentation: Analysis of Uinta Basin, Utah Gas-Bearing Cretaceous and Tertiary Strata
    Principal drill stem test database (UBDST) and documentation: analysis of Uinta Basin, Utah gas-bearing Cretaceous and Tertiary strata by J. Ben Wesley, Craig J. Wandrey, and Thomas D. Fouchl U.S. Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO Open-File 93-193 Work Performed under contract No.: DE-AI21-83MC2042 for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy Morgantown Energy Technology Center, Morgantown, West Virginia This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards, (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code.) Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this program has been used by the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy and functioning of the program and related program material, nor shall the fact of distrubution constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the USGS in connection therewith. 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225 Introduction................................................................................................................2 METHODS ......................................................................................................................5 Data Base Structure.....................................................................................5 Drill Stem Tests.........................................................................................................?
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Oilfield Production Terminology (GOT) (DEFINITIONS and ABBREVIATIONS)
    Glossary of Oilfield Production Terminology (GOT) (DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS) FIRST EDITION, JANUARY 1, 1988 American Petroleum Institute 1220 L Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005 Issued by AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE Production Department FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING TECHNICAL CONTENTS OF THIS PUBLICATION CONTACT THE API PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT, 2535 ONE MAIN PLACE, DALLAS, TX 75202-3904 – (214) 748-3841. SEE BACK SIDE FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING HOW TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION. Users of this publication should become familiar with its scope and content. This publication is intended to supplement rather than replace individual engineering judgment. OFFICIAL PUBLICATION REG U.S. PATENT OFFICE Copyright 1988 American Petroleum Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 2 SECTION 1: LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 3 SECTION 2: ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS 5 FOREWORD A. This publication is under the jurisdiction of the API Executive Committee on Standardization of Oilfield Equipment and Materials. B. The purpose of this publication is to provide standards writing groups access to previously used abbreviations and definitions. Standards writing groups are encouraged to adopt, when possible, the definitions found herein. Attention Users of this Publication: Portions of this publication have been changed from the previous edition. The location of changes has been marked with a bar in the margin. In some cases the changes are significant, while in other cases the changes reflect minor editorial adjustments. The bar notations in the margins are provided as an aid to users to identify those parts of this publication that have been changed from the previous edition, but API makes no warranty as to the accuracy of such bar notations.
    [Show full text]
  • UKCS Technology Insights
    UKCS Technology Insights April 2019 Unless identified elsewhere, all data is from the OGA UKSS 2017 and 2018 Cover photos: High frequency FWI image – courtesy of DownUnder Geosolutions using Capreolus 3D data from TGS Ocean bottom nodes – courtesy of Magseis Fairfield Riserless mud recovery – courtesy of Enhanced Drilling Carbon composite pipe – courtesy of Magma Global Contents Foreword 5 1. Seismic and exploration 22 Executive summary 6 2. Well drilling and completions 28 Operators’ technology plans 8 3. Subsea systems 34 Existing technologies for MER UK 12 4. Installations and topsides 40 Emerging technologies – MER UK priorities 14 5. Reservoir and well management 46 OGA’s technology stewardship 16 6. Facilities management 52 The Oil & Gas Technology Centre (OGTC) 18 7. Well plugging and abandonment 58 Technology plan feedback 21 8. Facilities decommissioning 64 Conclusions 70 Appendix - Technology spend 72 Image courtesy of Airbourne Oil & Gas Foreword I am pleased to see constant progress in the way our industry is OGTC, MER UK Taskforces and industry sponsors. A small maturing and deploying new technologies for the UK Continental technical team will be established to measure progress on all key Shelf (UKCS). This important effort is being supported by the objectives. Ultimately, these objectives will be followed up and coordinated work of the Oil and Gas Authority (OGA), the monitored through the OGA stewardship to further encourage Technology Leadership Board (TLB) and the Oil & Gas Technology uptake and share best practice. Centre (OGTC). There are huge prizes in reserves growth, production value and, This year’s Technology Insights summarises the rich content of most importantly, safe asset operation and life extension from the UKCS operators’ technology plans, submitted through the OGA use of current and new technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form Year Ended December 31, 2017 March 23, 2018
    Annual Information Form Year Ended December 31, 2017 March 23, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL MATTERS ................................................................................................................................ 1 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements ..................................................................... 1 Reserves and Resources Advisory ........................................................................................................... 3 Currency .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................... 5 CORPORATE STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ................................................................................... 6 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Corporate History and License Areas ...................................................................................................... 7 Corporate Social Responsibility ............................................................................................................ 11 Environmental and Safety Matters .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overpressure and Petroleum Generation and Accumulation in the Dongying Depression of the Bohaiwan Basin, China
    Geofluids (2001) 1, 257–271 Overpressure and petroleum generation and accumulation in the Dongying Depression of the Bohaiwan Basin, China X. XIE1,2,C.M.BETHKE2 ,S.LI1 ,X.LIU1 AND H. ZHENG3 1Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; 2Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA; 3Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Shenli Oil Corporation, Dongying, Shandong, China ABSTRACT The occurrence of abnormally high formation pressures in the Dongying Depression of the Bohaiwan Basin, a prolific oil-producing province in China, is controlled by rapid sedimentation and the distribution of centres of active petro- leum generation. Abnormally high pressures, demonstrated by drill stem test (DST) and well log data, occur in the third and fourth members (Es3 and Es4) of the Eocene Shahejie Formation. Pressure gradients in these members com- monly fall in the range 0.012–0.016 MPa mÀ1, although gradients as high as 0.018 MPa mÀ1 have been encountered. The zone of strongest overpressuring coincides with the areas in the central basin where the principal lacustrine source rocks, which comprise types I and II kerogen and have a high organic carbon content (>2%, ranging to 7.3%), are actively generating petroleum at the present day. The magnitude of overpressuring is related not only to the burial depth of the source rocks, but to the types of kerogen they contain. In the central basin, the pressure gradient within submember Es32, which contains predominantly type II kerogen, falls in the range 0.013–0.014 MPa mÀ1. Larger gra- dients of 0.014–0.016 MPa mÀ1 occur in submember Es33 and member Es4, which contain mixed type I and II kero- gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Energy Assets on the Market (SEAM) Database on IHS
    Significant Energy Assets on the Market (SEAM) Database on IHS Connect IHS Energy has launched a new database tool that actively tracks all known energy assets on the market and independently values them in a transparent manner utilizing more than 40,000 comparable transactions from IHS’s M&A database dating back to 1988. Assets on the Market database features include: • Searchable and exportable database covering all global and regional • Source documents including offering memos, prospectuses, and locations and all resource segments, detailing valuations and full press releases. operational data including reserves, production and acreage. • Full opportunity set currently totals approximately $250 billion • Contact information for sellers and advisors. Canada $25 B+ Europe $30 B+ Sellers Key Assets for Sale (or JV) Sellers Key Assets for Sale (or JV) Apache Corp. 1 million acres in Provost region of east-central Alberta Antrim Energy Skellig Block in Porcupine Basin Athabasca Oil Corp. 350,000 net prospective acres in Duvernay BNK Petroleum Joint venture partner sought for Polish shale gas play Canadian Oil Sands Rejects Suncor offer; reviewing strategic alternatives BP 16% stake in Culzean gas field in UK North Sea Centrica plc Offering 6,346 boe/d (86% gas) ConocoPhillips 24% stake in UK’s Clair oil field. Considering sale of Norwegian Cequence Energy Montney-focused E&P undergoing strategic review North Sea fields ConocoPhillips Western Canada gas properties Endeavour Int’l. Bankrupt; to sell Alba and Rochelle fields in the UK North
    [Show full text]
  • High Impact Sector Companies Analysed in the CDP Europe Report – 2019 Disclosure Year
    High impact sector companies analysed in the CDP Europe Report – 2019 disclosure year The materials, energy and transport sectors, along with agriculture, comprise CDP’s high impact sectors. However due to lack of reporting data, the Agriculture sector was not included in the high- impact company analysis. Organization name Country Sector EVN AG Austria Electric utilities Mayr-Melnhof Karton Aktiengesellschaft Austria Paper & forestry OMV AG Austria Oil & gas Österreichische Post AG Austria Transport services VERBUND AG Austria Electric utilities Voestalpine AG Austria Steel Food, beverage & Anheuser Busch InBev Belgium tobacco Bekaert NV Belgium Metals & mining bpost Belgium Transport services Elia System Operator Belgium Electric utilities Fluxys Belgium Belgium Oil & gas Nyrstar NV Belgium Metals & mining Ontex Group NV Belgium Paper & forestry Solvay S.A. Belgium Chemicals CEZ Czechia Electric utilities A.P. Moller - Maersk Denmark Transport services Food, beverage & Carlsberg Breweries A/S Denmark tobacco Food, beverage & Chr. Hansen Holding A/S Denmark tobacco Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S Denmark Transport services DFDS A/S Denmark Transport Services DSV A/S Denmark Transport services Novozymes A/S Denmark Chemicals Ørsted Denmark Electric utilities Finnair Finland Transport services Fortum Oyj Finland Electric utilities Huhtamäki Oyj Finland Paper & forestry Kemira Corporation Finland Chemicals Metsä Board Finland Paper & forestry Neste Oyj Finland Oil & gas Outokumpu Oyj Finland Steel Stora Enso Oyj Finland Paper & forestry UPM-Kymmene
    [Show full text]
  • Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund Plc Unaudited Portfolio Holdings at 31St July 2020
    Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund plc Unaudited portfolio holdings at 31st July 2020 The investments listed below have been valued on a fair value basis using closing bid prices. Market Nominal value Investment SEDOL ISIN holding £ 4Imprint Group Ord GBP0.385 664097 GB0006640972 105,000 2,493,750 A G Barr Ord GBP0.04167 B6XZKY7 GB00B6XZKY75 700,000 2,999,500 Anglo Pacific Group Ord GBP0.02 644936 GB0006449366 2,050,000 2,423,100 Bodycote PLC Ord GBP0.173 B3FLWH9 GB00B3FLWH99 800,000 4,504,000 Brewin Dolphin Ord GBP0.01 176581 GB0001765816 1,610,000 4,218,200 Cairn Energy Ord GBP0.0136686 B74CDH8 GB00B74CDH82 2,300,000 2,748,500 Capita Plc B23K0M2 GB00B23K0M20 2,700,000 924,210 CLS Holdings Plc Ord GBP0.025 BF04459 GB00BF044593 1,749,950 3,415,902 Computacenter Plc Ord 0.075555 BV9FP30 GB00BV9FP302 300,000 5,943,000 Cranswick Ord GBP0.10 231888 GB0002318888 114,000 4,078,920 Crest Nicholson Holdings Ltd Ord GBP0.05 B8VZXT9 GB00B8VZXT93 800,000 1,496,000 Dechra Pharmaceuticals Ord GBP0.01 963318 GB0009633180 143,310 4,087,201 Diploma Ord GBP0.05 182663 GB0001826634 320,000 5,801,600 Dunelm Group GBP.01 B1CKQ73 GB00B1CKQ739 790,000 9,709,100 Fisher (James) Ord GBP0.25 339500 GB0003395000 266,000 3,037,720 Future PLC Ord GBP0.15 BYZN904 GB00BYZN9041 212,000 2,925,600 Games Workshop Ord GBP0.05 371847 GB0003718474 80,000 7,024,000 Gamesys Group Plc Ord NPV BZ14BX5 GB00BZ14BX56 132,072 1,226,949 Genus Ord GBP0.10 207458 GB0002074580 80,000 2,716,800 Grafton Group New Units B00MZ44 IE00B00MZ448 530,000 3,407,900 Grainger Ord GBP0.05 B04V127 GB00B04V1276
    [Show full text]
  • Premier Oil 2020 Sustainability Report
    Working together to safely deliver responsible energy 2020 Sustainability Report Contents Introduction Governance Planet People Prosperity Our reporting About this report 01 Overview 09 Overview 19 Overview 30 Overview 42 Reporting standards 50 and performance data Opening message 02 Our approach 10 Energy transition 20 Occupational health, safety 31 Value generation 43 and climate change and security and distribution External Review of 51 Our purpose 04 Business ethics 12 Sustainability Reporting and strategy Effluents, spills and waste 26 Process safety and Public policy and 44 Risk management 13 asset integrity 34 government relations Independent 52 Living our values 05 Stakeholder engagement 13 Assurance Statement Emergency preparedness Human rights 45 At a glance 06 Material Sustainability issues 14 and crisis management 35 Responsible supply Key performance 07 Commitment to the UN SDGs 17 Local employment 36 chain management 46 highlights Diversity and inclusion 37 Security 47 Employee engagement 39 Decommissioning 48 Introduction Governance Planet People Prosperity Our reporting About this report 2020 Sustainability Report 01 This report is Premier Oil’s 15th annual Sustainability Report, covering our performance for the period 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020. The report covers all our operated activities, including our exploration, development and production operations – and, where relevant, those of our non-operated joint venture partners and contractors. This report has been approved by the Audit and Risk Committee of our Board. It has been prepared using the Global Reporting Initiative (‘GRI’) Standards and makes a GRI Core ‘in-accordance’ claim. The report covers our most material Sustainability issues, as identified in our annual Materiality Assessment Process.
    [Show full text]