Entire Issue (PDF 3MB)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter Legislative Recap for the 40Th Annual ESOP Conference Visit Us
July 2017 Chapter Legislative Recap for the 40th Annual ESOP Conference Company and professional members of the Minnesota / Dakotas Chapter attended numerous legislative meetings at the 40th Annual ESOP Conference in Washington, D.C., May 11 and 12. Visits were arranged where employee owners met with legislators or their respective aides to gain additional support for ESOPs. A special thank you to the legislative staff and aides at all of the MN, ND and SD congressional and senatorial offices for coordinating and participating in the meetings. We appreciate your continued support and would be interested in hosting a company visit in your district! Congresswoman Kristi Noem, North Dakota Congressman Rick Nolan, Minnesota Congressman Collin Peterson, Minnesota A New Congress with a New ESOP Bill This year on April 12, 2017, six members of congress introduced the Promotion and Expansion of Private Employee Ownership Act of 2017. Today, 14 more representatives have joined in co-sponsoring HR 2092. Thank you Co-Sponsors: Erik Paulsen, Kristi Noem, and Kevin Cramer. We would like to thank the following representatives for their support of the 2015 ESOP bills, HR. 2096 & S. 1212: Tim Walz (MN-1), Erick Paulsen (MN-3), Keith Ellison (MN-5), Tom Emmer (MN-6), Collin Peterson (MN-7), Rick Nolan (MN-8), Kevin Cramer (ND), Kristi Noem (SD), John Thune (SD), Al Franken (MN), Amy Klobuchar (MN), Heidi Heitkamp (SD) and John Hoeven (ND). Many of these representatives have been dedicated partners in supporting ESOP legislation for many years. In recognition of their consistent support, the MN/DAK ESOP Association Chapter presented Certificate of Appreciations during the Capitol Hill visits May 10 and 11th. -
Officials Say Flynn Discussed Sanctions
Officials say Flynn discussed sanctions The Washington Post February 10, 2017 Friday, Met 2 Edition Copyright 2017 The Washington Post All Rights Reserved Distribution: Every Zone Section: A-SECTION; Pg. A08 Length: 1971 words Byline: Greg Miller;Adam Entous;Ellen Nakashima Body Talks with Russia envoy said to have occurred before Trump took office National security adviser Michael Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country's ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials, current and former U.S. officials said. Flynn's communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were interpreted by some senior U.S. officials as an inappropriate and potentially illegal signal to the Kremlin that it could expect a reprieve from sanctions that were being imposed by the Obama administration in late December to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the 2016 election. Flynn on Wednesday denied that he had discussed sanctions with Kislyak. Asked in an interview whether he had ever done so, he twice said, "No." On Thursday, Flynn, through his spokesman, backed away from the denial. The spokesman said Flynn "indicated that while he had no recollection of discussing sanctions, he couldn't be certain that the topic never came up." Officials said this week that the FBI is continuing to examine Flynn's communications with Kislyak. Several officials emphasized that while sanctions were discussed, they did not see evidence that Flynn had an intent to convey an explicit promise to take action after the inauguration. Flynn's contacts with the ambassador attracted attention within the Obama administration because of the timing. -
W-15J the Honorable Tim Walz Governor of Minnesota 130 State
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: W-15J The Honorable Tim Walz Governor of Minnesota 130 State Capitol 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1611 Dear Governor Walz: The Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians (the Tribe) has applied to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for program authorization under sections 518, 303, and 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Approval of the application would allow the Tribe to adopt, review, and revise water quality standards pursuant to Section 303(c) of the CWA and to certify that discharges comply with those water quality standards pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA, for all surface waters within the Red Lake Reservation and on certain tribally held trust lands outside the Reservation. In accordance with Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) §131.8(c)(2)-(3), EPA is requesting comments from the State of Minnesota on the Tribe’s assertion of authority to regulate surface water quality on the lands described above. A copy of the complete application and supporting maps can be found online at: https://www.epa.gov/mn/red-lake-band-chippewa- indians-minnesota-application-treatment-state-water-quality-standards. In addition to this written notice, EPA will issue a public notice in the Bemidji Pioneer and the Red Lake Nation News. The public notice will notify interested parties of the request for comments and, at the request of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), will advise them to send comments on the Tribe’s assertion of authority to EPA rather than to the State of Minnesota. -
The Original Meaning of the Constitution's Postal Clause
Birmingham City School of Law British Journal of British Journal of American Legal Studies | Volume 7 Issue 1 7 Issue Legal Studies | Volume British Journal of American American Legal Studies Volume 7 Issue 1 Spring 2018 ARTICLES Founding-Era Socialism: The Original Meaning of the Constitution’s Postal Clause Robert G. Natelson Toward Natural Born Derivative Citizenship John Vlahoplus Felix Frankfurter and the Law Thomas Halper Fundamental Rights in Early American Case Law: 1789-1859 Nicholas P. Zinos The Holmes Truth: Toward a Pragmatic, Holmes-Influenced Conceptualization of the Nature of Truth Jared Schroeder Acts of State, State Immunity, and Judicial Review in the United States Zia Akthar ISSN 2049-4092 (Print) British Journal of American Legal Studies Editor-in-Chief: Dr Anne Richardson Oakes, Birmingham City University. Associate Editors Dr. Sarah Cooper, Birmingham City University. Dr. Haydn Davies, Birmingham City University. Prof. Julian Killingley, Birmingham City University. Prof. Jon Yorke, Birmingham City University. Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Ireland, Maynooth. Birmingham City University Student Editorial Assistants 2017-2018 Mercedes Cooling Graduate Editorial Assistants 2017-2018 Amna Nazir Alice Storey Editorial Board Hon. Joseph A. Greenaway Jr., Circuit Judge 3rd Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals. Hon. Raymond J. McKoski, Circuit Judge (retired), 19th Judicial Circuit Court, IL. Adjunct Professor of Law, The John Marshall Law School, Chicago, IL. Prof. Antonio Aunion, University of Castille-la Mancha. Prof. Francine Banner, Phoenix School of Law, AZ. Prof. Devon W. Carbado, UCLA, CA. Dr. Damian Carney, University of Portsmouth, UK. Dr. Simon Cooper, Reader in Property Law, Oxford Brookes University. Prof. -
Mail Fraud State Law and Post-Lopez Analysis George D
Cornell Law Review Volume 82 Article 1 Issue 2 January 1997 Should Federalism Shield Corruption?-Mail Fraud State Law and Post-Lopez Analysis George D. Brown Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation George D. Brown, Should Federalism Shield Corruption?-Mail Fraud State Law and Post-Lopez Analysis , 82 Cornell L. Rev. 225 (1997) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol82/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHOULD FEDERALISM SHIELD CORRUPTION?- MAIL FRAUD, STATE LAW AND POST-LOPEZ ANALYSIS George D. Brownt I. INTRODUCTION-PROTECTION THROUGH PROSECUTION? There is a view of state and local governments as ethically-chal- lenged backwaters,' veritable swamps of corruption in need of the ulti- mate federal tutelage: protection through prosecution. Whether or not the view is accurate, the prosecutions abound.2 Many metropoli- tan newspapers have chronicled the federal pursuit of errant state and local officials.3 The pursuit is certain to continue. In the post-Water- gate period, the Justice Department has made political corruption at all levels of government a top priority.4 A vigorous federal presence in t Professor of Law and Associate Dean, Boston College Law School. A.B. 1961, Harvard University, LL.B. 1965, Harvard Law School. Chairman, Massachusetts State Eth- ics Commission. -
State Lawmakers Go Back to Work in New Environment by John Mueller Lawmakers and Constitutional Offi- Editor Cers Like Gov
Hoopsters close out 2018 Looking back Panther boys, girls host holiday tourney on 2018: Year — Sports Page 1B in review — Pages 3, 8 The McLeod County hronicle $1.25 Glencoe, Minnesota Vol. 122, No. 1C www.glencoenews.com January 2, 2019 State lawmakers go back to work in new environment By John Mueller lawmakers and constitutional offi- Editor cers like Gov. Tim Walz will be When the Minnesota Legislature sworn into office. returns to St. Paul later this week, The session is primarily aimed at things won’t be quite the same for establishing a biennial budget for the area lawmakers now that the DFL state. Most of the significant work has taken control of the House of on budget and bills will begin later Representatives, a new governor will in the month, Newman said. take over and Republicans hold a Minnesota’s current two-year op- majority in the Senate by one vote. erating budget is about $39.6 billion. Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen, R-Glen- The state’s budget is about $71.3 bil- coe, and Sen. Scott Newman, R- lion when all other funds are added. Hutchinson, believe they can still ef- Gruenhagen and Newman believe fectively represent their constituents the state’s budget has been growing though they may have to work a lit- too fast. They want to see the growth tle harder to forge compromises on trimmed to inflationary levels, just key policy and spending decisions. over 2 percent. The two Republican Gruenhagen and Newman will be Chronicle photos by John Mueller back to work Tuesday, Jan. -
NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby”
NRCC: MN-07 “Vegas, Baby” Script Documentation AUDIO: Taxpayers pay for Colin Peterson’s Since 1991, Peterson Has Been Reimbursed At personal, private airplane when he’s in Minnesota. Least $280,000 For Plane Mileage. (Statement of Disbursements of House, Chief Administrative Officer, U.S. House of Representatives) (Receipts and Expenditures: Report of the Clerk of TEXT: Collin Peterson the House, U.S. House of Representatives) Taxpayers pay for Peterson’s private plane Statement of Disbursements of House AUDIO: But do you know where else he’s going? Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The Safari Club International From March AUDIO: That’s right. Vegas, Baby. Vegas. 22, 2002 To March 25, 2002 Costing, $1,614. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The American Federation Of Musicians From June 23, 2001 To June 25, 2001, Costing $919. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) Peterson Went Las Vegas On Trip Sponsored By The Safari Club International From January 11, 2001 To January 14, 2001, Costing $918.33. (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) AUDIO: Colin Peterson took 36 junkets. Vacation- Throughout His Time In Congress, Peterson like trips, paid for by special interest groups. Has Taken At Least 36 Privately Funded Trip Worth $57,942 (Collin Peterson, Legistorm, Accessed 3/17/14) TEXT: 36 Junkets paid for by special interest groups See backup below Legistorm AUDIO: In Washington, Peterson took $6 million in Collin Peterson Took $6.7 Million In Campaign campaign money from lobbyists and special Money From Special Interest Group PACs interests. -
Legal Dilemmas Facing White House Counsel in the Trump Administration: the Costs of Public Disclosure of FISA Requests
Fordham Law Review Volume 87 Issue 5 Article 6 2019 Legal Dilemmas Facing White House Counsel in the Trump Administration: The Costs of Public Disclosure of FISA Requests Peter Margulies Roger Williams University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Peter Margulies, Legal Dilemmas Facing White House Counsel in the Trump Administration: The Costs of Public Disclosure of FISA Requests, 87 Fordham L. Rev. 1913 (2019). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol87/iss5/6 This Colloquium is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEGAL DILEMMAS FACING WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION: THE COSTS OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF FISA REQUESTS Peter Margulies* INTRODUCTION Not every presidential administration can forge a new brand of government lawyering. Historically, government lawyering has swung between two poles: (1) dialogic lawyering, which stresses reasoned elaboration, respect for institutions, and continuity with unwritten norms embodied in past practice; and (2) insular lawyering, which entails opaque definitions, disregard of other institutions, and departures from unwritten norms.1 Because President Trump regularly signals his disdain for institutions, such as the intelligence community, and unwritten norms, such as prosecutorial independence,2 senior lawyers in the White House have added a new mode of legal representation that entails ad hoc adjustments to President Trump’s mercurial decisions and triage among the presidential decisions they will try to temper. -
Declassification of DOJ Records by President Trump
Flood, Emmet T. EOP/ WHO From: Flood, Emmet T. EOP/ WHO Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 5:46 PM To: Bradley. A Brooker; Eisenberg, John A. EOP/ NSC; Boente, Dana W~~F~I~: . _,. II"• =u Weinsheimer Bradley (ODAG); Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG); 1-1111■11■111 OGC) {FBl)~JltRMl'm' M·iil·WII! Browning, Dawn M. {OGC) {FBI) Subject: RE: Documents Brad= thank you for this. I have one thought to add. For Part (1 )-(c) below: The President has today directed that pages 10-12 and 17-34 of the 4th FISA (3rd renewal) Application be reviewed for his declassification. (b) (5) (b) (5) 1 At this time, all that is needed is review ofthose select pages from that particular application. Thanks, all. Emmet Flood Special Counsel to the President (b) (6) From: BradleyA Brooker (b)(3}, (b)(6) per ODNI Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 5:34 PM To: Flood, EmmetT. EOP/ WHO (b) (6) ; Eisenberg, John A. EOP/ NSC (b) (6) ; Boente, Dana (DO) (FBI) ; Brad Weinsheimer (b) (6) Gauhar, Tashina &ODAGi <[email protected]>; (b)(6). (b)(7)(C) per FBI (OGC) (FBI}' (b)(6) (b)( 7)(C) (b)(7)(E) per FBI;1wzr·1vttt:mz (b)(3}, (b)(6) per ODNI W••iif•/'lil" (b)(3}, (b)(6) per ODNI 'Browning, Da wn M. (OGC) (FBI)' (b)(6), (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(E) per FBI Subject: Documents All, There have been a number of phone calls today and I wanted to send around a short note to ensure we are all operating under the same set of instructions and timeline: (1) By close of business tonight, FBI will forward to me (on the high side) any proposed redactions itmay have to the three sets of documents. -
FEDERALISM and INSURANCE REGULATION BASIC SOURCE MATERIALS © Copyright NAIC 1995 All Rights Reserved
FEDERALISM AND INSURANCE REGULATION BASIC SOURCE MATERIALS © Copyright NAIC 1995 All rights reserved. ISBN 0-89382-369-4 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Printed in the United States of America FEDERALISM AND INSURANCE REGULATION BASIC SOURCE MATERIALS by SPENCER L. KIMBALL Professor Emeritus of Law, University of Chicago Research Professor, University of Utah College of Law Of Counsel, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. and BARBARA P. HEANEY Attorney at Law, Madison, WI Consulting Attorney on Insurance, Wisconsin Legislative Council, 1978-1994 Madison, Wisconsin Table of Contents Prefatory Note ............................................................................. ix I. Origins of Regulation .............................................................. 3 A. Special Charters .............................................................. :.3 Commentary ......................................................... 3 Chapter LXXX, LAws or COMMONWEALTH OF M~SSACH~SETTS, 1806--1809 .............................. 3 B. General Incorporation Statutes .......................................... 6 Commentary ......................................................... 6 MASSACHUSETTS ACTS AND RESOLVES 1845, Chapter 23 ........................................................ 7 C. Beginnings of Formal Insurance Regulation ....................... 7 Commentary ......................................................... 7 MASSACHUSETTS ACTS AND RESOLVES 1852, Chapter 231 ...................................................... -
Freshman Class of the 110Th Congress at a Glance
Freshman Class of the 110th Congress at a Glance NEW HOUSE MEMBERS BY DISTRICT Position on Position on District Republican Democrat1 Winner Immigration Immigration Border security with AZ-05 J.D. Hayworth Enforcement first Harry E. Mitchell Mitchell • guest worker program Employer sanctions; Randy Graf AZ-08 Enforcement first Gabrielle Giffords “comprehensive Giffords (Jim Kolbe) reform” “Comprehensive CA-11 Richard W. Pombo• Enforcement first Jerry McNerney reform” and “path to McNerney citizenship” Kevin McCarthy Enforcement and tighter CA-22 Sharon M. Beery No clear position McCarthy (Bill Thomas) border security Doug Lamborn Tighter security; CO-05 Jay Fawcett Enforcement first Lamborn (Joel Hefley) opposes amnesty “Comprehensive Rick O’Donnell Enforcement first; CO-07 Ed Perlmutter reform” and “path to Perlmutter (Bob Beauprez) employer sanctions citizenship” CT-02 Bob Simmons• Enforcement first Joe Courtney Employer Sanctions Courtney Supports tighter border CT-05 Nancy L. Johnson Christopher S. Murphy “Path to citizenship” Murphy • security 1For simplification, this column also includes Independents. Incumbent Retiring incumbent Vacating to run for higher office Resigning Lost in the primary Position on Position on District Republican Democrat1 Winner Immigration Immigration Gus Bilirakis FL-09 Enforcement first Phyllis Busansky Supports border security Bilirakis (Michael Bilirakis) Kathy Castor “Comprehensive FL-11 Eddie Adams Opposes amnesty Castor (Jim Davis) reform” Supports enforcement, Vern Buchanan Employer sanctions; FL-13 tighter security; Christine Jennings Buchanan (Katherine Harris) “path to citizenship” opposes amnesty Supports border Joe Negron FL-16 Tighter border security Tim Mahoney security; “path to Mahoney (Mark Foley) citizenship” “Comprehensive reform”; FL-22 E. Clay Shaw Ron Klein Employer sanctions Klein • guest worker program Hank Johnson “Comprehensive GA-04 Catherine Davis Enforcement first; removal (Cynthia A. -
Some Consequences of Increased Federal Activity in Law Enforcement David Fellman
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 35 | Issue 1 Article 2 1944 Some Consequences of Increased Federal Activity in Law Enforcement David Fellman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation David Fellman, Some Consequences of Increased Federal Activity in Law Enforcement, 35 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 16 (1944-1945) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF INCREASED FEDERAL ACTIVITY IN LAW ENFORCEIENT David Felhnan (The writer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Nebraska, considers in this article the impact of our expanding national criminal jurisdiction upon American federalism, public law, constitutional morality, and standards of criminal justice.-EDrron.) The Growth of the Federal Criminal Code The First Congress, in its second session, adopted "An Act for the Punishment of certain Crimes against the United States."' It was a modest statute of thirty-three sections, dealing with treason, misprision of treason, felonies in places within the exclusive juris- diction of the United States and upon the high seas, forgery or counterfeiting of federal paper, the stealing or falsifying of rec- ords of the federal courts, perjury, bribery and obstruction of pro- cess in the courts, suits involving the public ministers of foreign states, and procedure.