Is Drought Over for Pharming Science2007.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Is Drought Over for Pharming Science2007.Pdf In the bag. These cultured carrot cells are engineered to make a human drug. MANY A CHILD HAS BEEN TOLD “CARROTS eign protein much as if it were one of the might be simpler to process because they are good for you.” That advice could soon take plant’s own genes. would be free of animal pathogens. on new meaning for people with Gaucher dis- However, technological hurdles and a Other discoveries followed. In 1995, for ease, an inherited metabolic disorder that leads lack of interest from drug companies have instance, Arntzen’s group reported in Science to liver and bone problems. Patients must now hamstrung “pharming,” as have worries that that potatoes engineered to make a cholera on April 12, 2009 be injected every 2 weeks with a manufactured pharma crops will escape from their experi- protein worked as a vaccine when the spuds enzyme that costs on average $200,000 a year, mental plots and taint the food supply. As a were fed to mice. Such “edible vaccines” could making it one of the most expensive drugs ever. result, many companies have abandoned this offer developing countries cheap oral vaccines If ongoing clinical trials go well, the 5000 Gaucher research or gone under. And no plant- that didn’t require refrigeration, Arntzen sug- patients on the therapy could soon have a made drugs for humans have made it to gested (Science, 5 May 1995, p. 658). second option—a cheaper version of the the pharmacy. A company called Large Scale Biology enzyme that stays in the bloodstream longer But academic scientists and some compa- Corp. in Vacaville, California, came up with a and can be injected less often. nies have persisted, improving yields of shortcut. It didn’t bother to create a new If the U.S. Food and Drug Administration plant-made drugs and developing innovative tobacco strain when it wanted to produce an www.sciencemag.org (FDA) approves recombinant glucocerebrosi- ways to keep pharming inside the lab, or the antigen for a lymphoma vaccine. It simply dase, it will be good news not only for medicine greenhouse. Several plant-made pharmaceu- sprayed tobacco plants with a tobacco mosaic but also for a community far removed from the ticals (PMPs) are now in patient trials (see virus carrying the appropriate gene. The clinic: plant scientists. Protalix Biotherapeutics chart, p. 474). Moreover, the European leaves produced useful amounts of the vaccine in Karmiel, Israel, produces this new version of Union, the Bill and Melinda Gates Founda- protein within 14 days. The drug worked in the protein in giant plastic bags, not in steel vats tion, and the U.S. Department of Defense are mice, suggesting that vaccines tailored to lym- of mammalian cells like most biologics are. fertilizing the field with new funding. “We’re phoma patients’ tumors could be made in Downloaded from The bags are filled with transgenic carrot cells actually not doing too bad,” says Julian Ma, plants in just weeks. And because the plants that are cultured and then processed to extract an immunologist at St. George’s University carried the foreign gene only until they shed the drug. “If Protalix gets regulatory approval, of London in the U.K. “It’s just that everyone their leaves, they were potentially more that would [make it] the first plant-made phar- is in a hurry.” acceptable than permanently modified crops. maceutical,” says plant scientist Charles Arntzen of Arizona State University in Tempe. Fields of dreams “For people who work in this field, it will be a The excitement over plant-made very exciting step forward.” pharmaceuticals began with a Arntzen is chasing an elusive dream: using 1989 paper in Nature showing whole plants as factories to make drugs. that monoclonal antibodies could Nearly 20 years ago, when researchers first be produced in tobacco. The paper showed that a tobacco plant could be engi- “really captured the imagination,” neered to crank out an antibody, they envi- says Ma. Monoclonal antibodies sioned harvesting cheap supplies of therapeu- were being used to treat a growing tic proteins, antibodies, and vaccines from vast number of diseases, from arthritis fields of crops. For this approach, researchers to cancer, but were expensive to isolate the target gene and usually insert it into make in mammalian cells. So- a bacterium called Agrobacterium that readily called plantibodies appeared to Temporary transgenic. Fluorescing protein shows infects the plants and passes on the gene. The offer a cheaper production tobacco leaf’s pharming gene becomes part of the plant and is passed method—a kilogram might cost potential. CREDITS (TOP TO BOTTOM): PROTALIX; BAYER AG BAYER CREDITS (TOP TO BOTTOM): PROTALIX; from one generation to the next, producing for- $100 rather than $3 million—and www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 320 25 APRIL 2008 473 Published by AAAS Plant Genomes Safety in Washington, D.C., says Selected Plant-Made Pharmaceuticals enforcement is “horrendous.” As a result, “we don’t think [drugs] should Company Plant Grown in Drug or product Disease Status be in any food crops, indoors or out- doors,” he adds. Many ecologists and Human drugs some plant scientists are also leery of Protalix Biotherapeutics carrot cell culture glucocerebrosidase Gaucher disease Phase III trial* using food crops for pharma. “It’s too Biolex Therapeutics duckweed indoor chambers alpha interferon hepatitis C Phase II trial* dangerous,” says Kenneth Palmer, SemBioSys Genetics safflower field insulin diabetes Phase I/II trial † former director of the vaccine pro- Meristem Therapeutics corn field lipase cystic fibrosis Phase III trial † gram at Large Scale Biology. These concerns drove many com- Other products panies away from using food crops Ventria Bioscience rice field lactoferrin, lysozyme diarrhea Efficacy trial § such as corn for pharmaceuticals. A Cobento Arabidopsis greenhouse human intrinsic factor Vitamin B-12 deficiency Approved †† few big companies, such as Monsanto, dropped PMP research altogether. Planet Biotechnology tobacco field secretory antibody vaccine tooth decay E.U. approved Stung by bad press and lack of interest Dow AgroSciences tobacco cell culture poultry vaccine Newcastle disease USDA approved from drug companies, many leading CIGB, Cuba tobacco greenhouse vaccine purification antibody hepatitis B On market plant pharma companies have folded, * Ongoing; † Projected late 2008; § Completed; †† In Ukraine. including ProdiGene and Large Scale Steps along the way. No plant-made human drug has made it through final clinical trials, but several “pharmed” Biology. As Palmer puts it, “the proteins are close to or on the market as supplements, a vaccine reagent, and a medical device. field imploded.” on April 12, 2009 Scores of biotech companies sprang up to make a pig vaccine sprouted in a soybean field Close to the clinic commercialize these discoveries, and some in Nebraska. For this and an Iowa mishap, the Despite the setbacks, a handful of companies in big agbiotech companies got involved as U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) the United States and Europe haven’t given up. well. By the mid-1990s, more than 180 com- fined the company $250,000 and made it pay A few have plowed ahead with food crops, panies and organizations were working on $3 million to buy and destroy tainted soy- grown outdoors, for their pharma products; pharming, according to the Biotechnology beans. The incident stoked opposition from others have focused on other plants or on Industry Organization. farmers and activists worried about “drugs in unconventional growing schemes. The companies soon ran into technological your cornflakes.” Meristem Therapeutics in Clermont- snags, however. Biotechnologists couldn’t Other companies underestimated the pub- Ferrand, France, plans to start final clinical www.sciencemag.org always get plants to express enough protein and lic’s concerns. A company called Ventria Bio- trials for a corn-grown gastric lipase for cystic had trouble purifying the protein product. science that wanted to conduct field trials of fibrosis patients by the end of the year. And the Efforts to make edible vaccines stalled after rice containing two breast-milk proteins useful Canadian company SemBioSys Genetics Inc. researchers realized that the amount of antigen in combating diarrhea drew the ire of rice uses transgenic safflower—“much less of a fluctuated widely from plant to plant. Arntzen growers in California, then Missouri. It wound lightning rod than some other crops,” says CEO thinks that oral vaccines made from dried plant up in Kansas, where no other rice is grown. Andrew Baum—to produce insulin, which material could work for developing countries, USDA tightened its rules for field trials of should be in clinical trials this year. Companies Downloaded from but a vaccine without a strictly controlled dose pharma plants in 2003 to prevent mistakes like such as Protalix and Biolex Therapeutics side- “would never be approved” in the United the ProdiGene episode. But skeptics were not step the growing of crops altogether: the former States, he says. assuaged. Bill Freese of the Center for Food with its carrot-cell culture to make a Gaucher Another reality check: lukewarm interest disease enzyme, and the latter by producing from the big drug companies. They didn’t interferon using duckweed, tiny clonal plants much care that plant-made drugs would be grown as a layer in clear plastic bags. “We are (SOURCE) INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES AND MOLECULARFARMING.COM; SEMBIOSYS AND MOLECULARFARMING.COM; (SOURCE) INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES cheaper to make because production is a careful not to be associated with whole-plant small chunk of the cost of drug development; transgenic technology,” says Protalix CEO the big-ticket item is clinical trials. The com- David Aviezer. SCIENCE panies were also leery of the regulatory hur- New technologies are attracting attention. dles, because both the drug and the new pro- To boost expression, the German biotech Icon duction process would have to clear FDA.
Recommended publications
  • DRAFT Landscape of COVID-19 Candidate Vaccines – 10 August 2020
    DRAFT landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines – 10 August 2020 28 candidate vaccines in clinical evaluation COVID-19 Vaccine Number of Route of Clinical Stage Vaccine platform Type of candidate vaccine Timing of doses developer/manufacturer doses Administration Phase 1 Phase 1/2 Phase 2 Phase 3 PACTR202006922165132 Non-Replicating University of Oxford/AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S 1 IM 2020-001072-15 2020-001228-32 ISRCTN89951424 Viral Vector Interim Report NCT04383574 Sinovac Inactivated Inactivated 2 0, 14 days IM NCT04456595 NCT04352608 Wuhan Institute of Biological Inactivated Inactivated 2 0,14 or 0,21 days IM ChiCTR2000031809 ChiCTR2000034780 Products/Sinopharm Beijing Institute of Biological Inactivated Inactivated 2 0,14 or 0,21 days IM ChiCTR2000032459 ChiCTR2000034780 Products/Sinopharm NCT04283461 NCT04405076 NCT04470427 Moderna/NIAID RNA LNP-encapsulated mRNA 2 0, 28 days IM Interim Report 2020-001038-36 BioNTech/Fosun Pharma/Pfizer RNA 3 LNP-mRNAs 2 0, 28 days IM NCT04368728 ChiCTR2000034825 CanSino Biological Inc./Beijing Institute Non-Replicating ChiCTR2000030906 ChiCTR2000031781 Adenovirus Type 5 Vector 1 IM of Biotechnology Viral Vector Study Report Study Report Anhui Zhifei Longcom Adjuvanted recombinant protein 0,28 or 0,28,56 Protein Subunit 2 or 3 IM NCT04445194 NCT04466085 Biopharmaceutical/Institute of (RBD-Dimer) days DISCLAIMER: These landscape documents have been prepared by the World Health Organization (WHO) for information purposes only concerning the 2019-2020 pandemic of the novel coronavirus. Inclusion of any particular product or entity in any of these landscape documents does not constitute, and shall not be deemed or construed as, any approval or endorsement by WHO of such product or entity (or any of its businesses or activities).
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Consumer Research
    ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH Labovitz School of Business & Economics, University of Minnesota Duluth, 11 E. Superior Street, Suite 210, Duluth, MN 55802 Cyborg As Commodity: Exploring Conceptions of Self-Identity, Body and Citizenship Within the Context of Emerging Transplant Technologies Ai-Ling Lai, University of Leicester, UK This paper explores how advances in transplant technologies shape conceptions of self-identity, embodiment and citizenship. Drawing on the posthuman writing of Donna Haraway and through phenomenological interviews, I explore ambivalence towards the commoditization of the cyborg-body, suggesting that biotechnology may potentially lead to a dystopian posthuman consumer society. [to cite]: Ai-Ling Lai (2012) ,"Cyborg As Commodity: Exploring Conceptions of Self-Identity, Body and Citizenship Within the Context of Emerging Transplant Technologies ", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 386-394. [url]: http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/1011658/volumes/v40/NA-40 [copyright notice]: This work is copyrighted by The Association for Consumer Research. For permission to copy or use this work in whole or in part, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center at http://www.copyright.com/. Cyborg as Commodity: Exploring Conception of Self-Identity, Body and Citizenship within the Context of Emerging Transplant Technologies Ai-Ling Lai, University of Leicester, UK ABSTRACT technology (Thompson 2004). In doing so, I aim to contribute to This paper explores how advances in transplant technologies previous writings by Johnson and Roberts (1997) and Belk (1990). shape conceptions of self-identity, embodiment and citizenship. Most notably, these scholars observe how the marketing of organ Drawing on the posthuman writing of Donna Haraway and from transplantation has previously been predicated on the ‘mechanistic’ phenomenological interviews, I explore ambivalence towards the metaphor of the body (Belk 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Pharming to Support Human Life on the Moon, Mars, and Beyond
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Molecular pharming to support human life on the moon, mars, and beyond. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vc0786j Journal Critical reviews in biotechnology, 41(6) ISSN 0738-8551 Authors McNulty, Matthew J Xiong, Yongao Mary Yates, Kevin et al. Publication Date 2021-09-01 DOI 10.1080/07388551.2021.1888070 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Critical Reviews in Biotechnology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ibty20 Molecular pharming to support human life on the moon, mars, and beyond Matthew J. McNulty, Yongao (Mary) Xiong, Kevin Yates, Kalimuthu Karuppanan, Jacob M. Hilzinger, Aaron J. Berliner, Jesse Delzio, Adam P. Arkin, Nancy E. Lane, Somen Nandi & Karen A. McDonald To cite this article: Matthew J. McNulty, Yongao (Mary) Xiong, Kevin Yates, Kalimuthu Karuppanan, Jacob M. Hilzinger, Aaron J. Berliner, Jesse Delzio, Adam P. Arkin, Nancy E. Lane, Somen Nandi & Karen A. McDonald (2021): Molecular pharming to support human life on the moon, mars, and beyond, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1888070 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1888070 © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa View supplementary material UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 09 Mar 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 455 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ibty20 CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1888070 REVIEW ARTICLE Molecular pharming to support human life on the moon, mars, and beyond a,b a,bà a,bà a,c Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchard and Pharming HAE Collaboration
    Joint analyst call: Orchard Therapeutics & Pharming Group Dr Sijmen de Vries, CEO, Pharming Group Dr Anurag Relan, CMO, Pharming Group Dr Bobby Gaspar, CEO, Orchard Therapeutics 1 July 2021 Forward-looking Statements This presentation may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, our development plans, our clinical results and other future conditions. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this presentation, including statements regarding our future financial or business performance, conditions, plans, prospects, trends or strategies, objectives of management and other financial and business matters; our current and prospective product candidates, planned clinical trials and preclinical studies, projected research and development costs, current and prospective collaborations; and the estimated size of the market for our product candidates, the timing and success of our development and commercialization of our product candidates and the market acceptance thereof, are forward-looking statements. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict all risks and uncertainties. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements except to the extent required by applicable law. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Cjm-2020-0239.Pdf
    Canadian Journal of Microbiology Exposure of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to agroinfiltration medium demonstrates cellular remodeling and may promote enhanced adaptability for molecular pharming Journal: Canadian Journal of Microbiology Manuscript ID cjm-2020-0239.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 15-Jul-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: Prudhomme, Nicholas; University of Guelph Pastora, Rebecca; PlantForm Inc. Muselius, Benjamin; University of Guelph McLean, Mike;Draft PlantForm Corporation Canada Cossar, Doug; PlantForm Corporation Canada Geddes-McAlister, Jennifer; University of Guelph, Molecular and Cellular Biology Agrobacterium tumefaciens, agroinfiltration medium, quantitative Keyword: proteomics, molecular pharming Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjm-pubs Page 1 of 39 Canadian Journal of Microbiology Title: Exposure of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to agroinfiltration medium demonstrates cellular remodeling and may promote enhanced adaptability for molecular pharming. Authors: Prudhomme, N.1, Pastora, R.2, Muselius, B.,1 McLean, M.D.2, Cossar, D.2, Geddes- McAlister, J.1* Affiliations: 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 2PlantForm Corporation Canada, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 3E2 Draft Corresponding author: Jennifer Geddes-McAlister, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1. Phone: 519-824-4120 ext. 52129. Email: [email protected] https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjm-pubs Canadian Journal of Microbiology Page 2 of 39 Abstract Agroinfiltration is used to treat plants with modified strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens for the purpose of transient in planta expression of genes transferred from the bacterium. These genes encode valuable recombinant proteins for therapeutic or industrial applications.
    [Show full text]
  • 2025: Global Trends to Improve Human Health
    2025: global trends to improve human health - From basic food via functional food, pharma-food to pharma-farming and pharmaceuticals Part 2: Pharma-food, pharma-farming and pharmaceuticals MANFRED KERN Bayer CropScience AG, D-40789 Monheim, Germany Functional food In a first part published in the November/december 2006 issue mannitol, polysaccharids, and triterpenoids called ganoderic of Agro-Food-Industry Hi-Tech, global trends to improve acids. It is known to be an immune modulator and potent human health were shown giving focus on food security, antioxidant and used to regulate blood pressure, to reduce minimal basic nutrition, life style and eating habits, role of food cholesterol and blood lipid levels (2). For the record, the Reishi in transition, transformation of the food industry, diversity of Mushroom is a food and not a pharmaceutical. food, information about food, demographic shifts and aging "Feed Your Genes Right - Eat to Turn off Disease-Causing populations. Genes and Slow Down Aging" is a book written by Jack In the second part focus is given on the transformation of Challem in 2005 (3). It is a review of the nutrigenomics health care, pharmaceuticals from plants, transformation of the breakthrough describing reverse age-related DNA damage, production of pharmaceuticals, plant-made pharmaceuticals, prevention of inherited diseases, loss of weight and the way to plant bio-pharming, pharma-farming, transformation of crop feel better. Nutrigenomics is still a very young scientific production, nanobiotechnology and a Vision 2025. discipline. Scientists use it as a way to find out how individual food ingredients or a defined number of food ingredients influence human metabolism on the basis of an individual TRANSFORMATION OF HEALTH CARE genome.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharming in Crop Commodities
    COrrespOndence Pharming in crop commodities To the editor: the time of admixture. These events might pharma product in food or feed? What On October 6th, the US Department of be construed as an unfortunate mistake of about nontarget exposure and hazards to Agriculture (USDA) proposed new rules little practical consequence that was blown arthropods and vertebrates in the field? governing the regulations and oversight of out of context. The questions of biosafety and risks are genetically engineered crops1. Although One can argue, as Henry Miller of the handled by regulators on a case-by-case some of the changes represent steps in Hoover Institute (Stanford, CA, USA) has basis. Toxicology from various exposure the right direction by making regulatory done so eloquently, that overly cautious rates to appropriate organisms are done for oversight more coherent, the new biotech food manufacturers and regulators have each overexpressed protein or metabolite regulations would allow fallen into the hands of interest. This procedure is no different the outdoor cultivation of of Luddites in that from that for dozens of transgenic events pharma food crops, in stark insignificant amounts deregulated in the United States and has contrast to the editorial of DNA and protein proven to be effective because no negative stance of your journal, ‘contaminants’ could human health or environmental effects have which calls for food plants not have any biological been noted as trillions of transgenic plants to no longer be used for effects—that is, no harm, have been grown in the United States5. producing drugs2. Indeed, no foul4. But I do not see Pharming crosses paradigms of Jane Rissler, senior scientist Miller changing many agriculture and pharmaceutical & deputy director, Food & minds in food industry production, yielding economies of Environment Program at and regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharming Turns to Gene Therapy for Next-Gen HAE Therapy
    July 01, 2021 Pharming turns to gene therapy for next-gen HAE therapy Lisa Urquhart Hereditary angioedema (HAE) has gone from an intractable, life-threatening, rare disease to a field with eight marketed drugs in just 13 years. If Pharming has its way one of the next additions could be a gene therapy. The Dutch group has inked a $17.5m up-front deal with Orchard Therapeutics for worldwide rights to OTL-105. OTL- 105 works by inserting one or more functional copies of the SERPING1 gene into patients' own hematopoietic stem cells ex vivo, enabling production of the C1-INH protein HAE patients lack. Pharming could well steal a march on market leader Takeda by investing in gene therapy now; the Japanese giant, whose Takhzyro is forecast to hit blockbuster status this year, does not appear to have a stake in any such technology in HAE. Nearer term-innovation in HAE includes Kalvista and Pharvaris's oral projects in both the acute and prophylactic space. Several groups are looking at longer-acting mechanisms, including CSL with its once monthly MAb, while in vivo gene editing and RNAi projects are in early stages elsewhere. Should these approaches succeed a less convenient gene therapy could well prove useful only for the most severe cases, but with much work still to be done that remains a debate for the future. Selected long-acting and cell and gene therapy HAE projects Company Description Phase III Garadacimab CSL Once-monthly MAb for prophylaxis Phase II IONIS-PKK-LRx Ionis Pharmaceuticals Once-monthly antisense for prophylaxis Pre-clinical ALN-F12 Alnylam Pharmaceuticals RNAi targeting coagulation factor XII BMN 331 BioMarin Pharmaceutical AAV5-based gene therapy NTLA-2002 Intellia Therapeutics Prekallikrein (PKK) antisense Un-named Regenxbio AAV gene therapy Un-named Orchard/Pharming Autologous hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy Source: Evaluate Pharma.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific IP Issues with Molecular Pharming: Case Study of Plant-Derived Vaccines
    CHAPTER 17.23 Specific IP Issues with Molecular Pharming: Case Study of Plant-Derived Vaccines AnAtole KrAttiger, Research Professor, the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, Chair, bioDevelopments-International Institute; and Adjunct Professor, Cornell University, U.S.A. ricHArd t. MahoneY, Director, Vaccine Access, Pediatric Dengue Vaccine Initiative, International Vaccine Institute, Republic of Korea ABSTRACT clinical evaluation including human serum pro- The public sector is making substantially increased invest- teins (epidermal growth factor), monoclonal anti- ments in health technology innovation through public/ bodies, such as antigenic peptides for rabies virus, private partnerships to bring improved health technolo- gies to underserved people in developing countries. These tuberculosis and HIV, antibodies to treat cancer, product-development partnerships, however, face a com- cardiovascular diseases, gastric lipase in the fight mon problem: how to manage intellectual property (IP). against cystic fibrosis, and hepatitis B antibodies, Such management involves many issues. In relation to and a range of vaccines.1 Recombinant protein a case study, presented in this chapter, of plant-derived hepatitis B virus vaccine, the challenges involve obtaining drugs are one of the fastest growing segments of freedom to operate, securing new intellectual property, the pharmaceutical industry, currently generat- and deploying intellectual property to developing coun- ing over US$20 billion in annual revenues. They tries. We conclude that while challenges abound, the IP are the so-called third generation of recombinant issues are fairly clear and can be addressed with straight- plant products.2 forward IP management approaches. The cost of manag- ing the intellectual property is expected to be minimal on From a global perspective, plant-derived vac- the price of the finished vaccine.
    [Show full text]
  • Monsanto & Genetic Engineering
    Monsanto & Genetic Engineering: Risks for Investors Report prepared by Innovest Strategic Value Advisors For Greenpeace Uncovering Hidden Value Potential for Strategic Investors April 2003 New York: (212) 421-2000 • London: +44 (0) 20 7743 6162 • Toronto: (905) 707-0876 • Paris: +33 (148) 860369 www.innovestgroup.com Report Prepared by Innovest Strategic Value Advisors Marc Brammer Senior Analyst 646-237-0217 [email protected] Frank Dixon, MBA (Media Contacts) Managing Director 646-237-0220 [email protected] Beth Ambrose Analyst +44-207-073-0475 [email protected] For Greenpeace Lindsay Keenan Genetic Engineering Campaigner + 49 30-3088-9916 [email protected] No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner without the written permission of Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, Inc. The information herein has been obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, Inc., its affiliated companies, or their respective shareholders, directors, officers and/or employees, may have a position in the securities discussed herein. The securities mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale in some states or countries, nor suitable for all types of investors; their value and the income they produce may fluctuate and/or be adversely affected by exchange rates. © 2003 Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, Inc. All rights reserved. New York Office: Four Times Square, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10036 USA (212) 421-2000 Fax (212) 421-9663 Toronto Office: 225 East Beaver Creek Road Suite 300, Richmond Hill Ontario L4B 3P4 CANADA (905) 707-0876 Fax (905) 707-9084 London Office: 4 Royal Mint Court, London, EC3N 4HJ ENGLAND +44 (0)20 7073 0470 Fax: +44 (0)20 7073 0473 Paris Office: 110 Boulevard de Sébastopol 75003 Paris FRANCE +33 (0)1 44 54 04 89 Fax: +33 (0)1 44 54 02 30 Website: www.innovestgroup.com Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Legal Problems of Pharming
    8Legal problems of pharming 8.1Introduction The regulatory framework of pharming is highly complex. As regards the sources of regulation, one must distinguish between European and national levels. The various phases of pharming, from the initial development to the authorization procedure to final manufacturing, are partly subject to dif- ferent legal rules. In addition, the various regulatory issues at the relevant stages are addressed by different pieces of regulation. The following text is organized so as to follow the “life cycle” of pharming products. When appropriate, the phases are further divided into segments according to the regulatory issues arising and the type of regulation concerned. The follow- ing overview provides an initial orientation. 8.2Development phase I: Protection from risks to the environment caused by the use and release of GMOs As regards risks to the environment caused by the use and release of GMOs in the development phase, the fundamental question concerns the neces- sary safety requirements in order to prevent harm to the environment from the relevant transgenic plants or animals. Alternative strict safety require- ments exist under the contained use regime established by the Directives 90/219 and 98/8 and the more liberal precautions under the release regime laid down by Directive 2001/18. 8.2.1Sources of legal regulation and their scope of application In this respect, two major EC directives1 may be relevant: – Directive 90/219 on the contained use of genetically modified microor- ganisms (contained use directive) as amended by Directive 98/81 (which has replaced almost entirely the former directive)2, – Directive 2001/18 on the deliberate release into the environment of ge- netically modified organisms (release directive).
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Scarcity
    PESTICIDE POP KIRSTEN STOLLE FEBRUARY 15 – MARCH 20, 2020 NOMEGALLERY.COM Glogauer Str. 17 | 10999 Berlin | Germany “No witchcraft, no enemy action had silenced the rebirth of new life in this stricken world. The people had done it themselves.” Rachel Carson, Silent Spring In her 1962 book of environmentalism, Silent Spring, Rachel Carson warned readers about the dangers of the chemical industry and the widespread use of pesticides in agriculture. Kirsten Stolle’s art practice follows Carson’s lead in exposing the pervasive misinformation spread by biotechnology corporations from the post-war era to the present. Pesticide Pop continues the artist’s research into agrochemical giants like Monsanto — who published a parodic rebuttal of Silent Spring back in the ‘60s. Stolle’s tactics of redaction, glitch, and appropriation across different media retell the true, toxic narrative of such conglomerates, and trace the connections between corporate interests and public health. Audio files from US Department of Agriculture videos in the 1940s-50s are extracted and looped; abraded chemical company stock certificates are overlayered with Letraset symbols; recent deceptive ads placed in the NY Times are corrected or blocked out; and a Monsanto TV commercial is turned into a series of lightboxes whose phrases call out the company’s greenwashing. As viewers find words in an oversized word-search puzzle – military – ddt – lawsuits – transgenic – war – the environmental violence of the industry emerges. While Stolle employs humor – the titular series satirically reframes weed killer as Pop Art – her work hammers home the serious reality of the effect that long-lasting toxicity has on our bodies, ecosystems, and the environment.
    [Show full text]