Xxixth Report on Competition Policy Xxixth Report on Competition Policy 1999
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aviation Week & Space Technology
STARTS AFTER PAGE 34 Using AI To Boost How Emirates Is Extending ATM Efficiency Maintenance Intervals ™ $14.95 JANUARY 13-26, 2020 2020 THE YEAR OF SUSTAINABILITY RICH MEDIA EXCLUSIVE Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa. -
The Reason Given for the UK's Decision to Float Sterling Was the Weight of International Short-Term Capital
- Issue No. 181 No. 190, July 6, 1972 The Pound Afloat: The reason given for the U.K.'s decision to float sterling was the weight of international short-term capital movements which, despite concerted intervention from the Bank of England and European central banks, had necessitated massive sup port operations. The U.K. is anxious that the rate should quickly o.s move to a "realistic" level, at or around the old parity of %2. 40 - r,/, .• representing an effective 8% devaluation against the dollar. A w formal devaluation coupled with a wage freeze was urged by the :,I' Bank of England, but this would be politically embarrassing in the }t!IJ light of the U.K. Chancellor's repeated statements that the pound was "not at an unrealistic rate." The decision to float has been taken in spite of a danger that this may provoke an international or European monetary crisis. European markets tend to consider sterling as the dollar's first line of defense and, although the U.S. Treasury reaffirmed the Smithsonian Agreement, there are fears throughout Europe that pressure on the U.S. currency could disrupt the exchange rate re lationship established last December. On the Continent, the Dutch and Belgians have put forward a scheme for a joint float of Common Market currencies against the dollar. It will not easily be implemented, since speculation in the ex change markets has pushed the various EEC countries in different directions. The Germans have been under pressure to revalue, the Italians to devalue. Total opposition to a Community float is ex pected from France (this would sever the ties between the franc and gold), and the French also are adamant that Britain should re affirm its allegiance to the European monetary agreement and return to a fixed parity. -
The Development of British Competition Law: a Complete Overhaul and Harmonization
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lever, Jeremy Working Paper The development of British competition law: a complete overhaul and harmonization WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS IV 99-4 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Lever, Jeremy (1999) : The development of British competition law: a complete overhaul and harmonization, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS IV 99-4, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/51159 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu discussion papers FS IV 99 - 4 The Development of British Competition Law: A Complete Overhaul and Harmonization Jeremy Lever March 1999 ISSN Nr. -
S.No. AEO Registration No Name IEC CODE
S.No. AEO Registration No Name IEC CODE 1 INAABCT3125D1F181 TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 0410021504 2 INAAECK5045N1F187 KURLON ENTERPRISE LTD 0314001204 3 INAAACM5317M1F183 MADRAS HARDTOOLS PRIVATE LIMITED 0492021040 4 INAATCS0933Q1F184 SHREE ASHTAVINAYAK PAPERS PVT.LTD 0313035059 5 INAAACB3691F1F180 OYSTER BATH CONCEPTS PVT.LTD. 0503036072 6 INAAACD5762B1F186 DEEPS TOOLS PVT.LTD. 3091001032 7 INAAACJ5553C1F181 JANATICS INDIA PVT. LTD 0489021042 8 INAAFCM8351G1F182 M V SHOE CARE PVT.LTD., 0509017240 9 INAANCS4209B1F182 S AND T ENGINEERS (P) LTD, 3209016330 10 INAAAFA4124D1F183 ANTLER 0488040043 11 INAABCM8697F1F181 AVO CARBON INDIA PRIVATE LTD., 0498028488 12 INAAFCA9114P1F180 ALINA PRIVATE LIMITED, 0491012349 13 INAABCM1418N1F186 MITTAL PIGMENTS PVT.LTD, 1394000189 14 INAAACB8571E1F186 BEKAERT INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. 3198000378 15 INAABCF9836H1F184 FINE PAPERSOURCE PRIVATE LIMITED 3803000092 16 INAAACV9365Q1F188 VIJAY ENTERPRISES PVT.LTD. 0894013602 17 INAAACJ2661H1F186 SUNGWOO HITECH INDIA LIMITED, 0406010005 18 INAABCF8078M1F182 FLIPKART INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 0711023611 19 INAACCK9634R1F180 KB AUTOSYS INDIA PVT LTD 0410014991 20 INAAKCS9901P1F184 SUSPA PNEUMATICS INDIA PRIVATE LTD., 0493003312 21 INAAACS6498M1F186 SAJJAN INDIA LIMITED 0388005131 22 INAADCC4791N1F185 C J S SPECIALTY CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED 0309000122 23 INAAFFM4128G1F186 MYSORE DEEP PERFUMERY HOUSE 1103006282 24 INAABFD4690C1F186 MASCOT METAL TRADERS 2493000081 25 INAACCP5395A1F189 PRAKASH CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LIMITED 3402001152 26 INAAACK2172J1F182 -
AEROSPACE CLUSTERS World’S Best Practice and Future Perspectives an Opportunity for South Australia
0 AEROSPACE CLUSTERS World’s Best Practice and Future Perspectives An Opportunity for South Australia Matteo Paone Intern – Universita’ Commerciale Luigi Bocconi Supervisor: Nicola Sasanelli AM Director – Space Industry and R&D Collaboration Defence SA Government of South Australia September 2016 Matteo Paone, Nicola Sasanelli AEROSPACE CLUSTERS - World’s Best Practice and Future Perspectives 1 “Quod Invenias Explorans Spatium Progressus Est Humanitatis” - Human Progress is in Space Exploration Hon Jay Weatherill - Premier of South Australia Matteo Paone, Nicola Sasanelli AEROSPACE CLUSTERS - World’s Best Practice and Future Perspectives 2 Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, the conclusions and the recommendations included in it constitute the opinions of the authors and should not be taken as representative of the views of Defence SA and the South Australian Government. No warranty, express or implied is made regarding the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, reliability or usefulness of the whole or any part of the information contained in this document. You should seek your own independent expert advice and make your own enquiries and satisfy yourself of all aspects of the information contained in this document. Any use or reliance on any of information contained in this document is at your own risk in all things. The Government of South Australia and its servants and its agents disclaim all liability and responsibility (including for negligence) for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any person through using or relying on any of the information contained in this document. -
Piaggio Aerospace Viale Generale Disegna, 1 17038 Villanova D’Albenga (Savona, Italy) Ph
Piaggio Aerospace Viale Generale Disegna, 1 17038 Villanova d’Albenga (Savona, Italy) Ph. 0039 0182 267911 [email protected] www.piaggioaerospace.it Piaggio America 1515 Perimeter Rd. West Palm Beach, FL 33406 THE PIAGGIO The Piaggio Aerospace MPA – Multirole Patrol Aircraft – is a technologically advanced, Piaggio Aerospace MPA with a Maximum Mach Operative (MMO) of 0.65 is the fastest not protrude into the pressure vessel and is provided with highly reliable 28VDC energy MPA – MULTIROLE PATROL AIRCRAFT efficient and competitive Special Mission, Multi-Role, Enforcement light twin turboprop aircraft Special Mission turboprop on the market. The platform has been designed to integrate supply for maximum mission performance. AEROSPACE designed to meet the requirement for security and enforcement missions in peacekeeping the most sophisticated mission sensors in the category and provide best in class vehicle The MPA’s open architecture Mission System offers inherent mission flexibility, while DIMENSIONS operations to real combat scenarios with the advanced performance and best in class performance at the same time, e.g.: the extensive use of COTS components guarantee a state-of-the-art human/machine Span 21.382 m [65.16 ft] MPA operational characteristics, comparable to those required by the most demanding operators • Climb quickly up to 41.000 feet. interface, graphics capability and computer throughput performance. The Aquila MMS Length 14.400 m [43.89 ft] MULTIROLE in this category. • Loiter quietly at low speed (125KTAS). integrates tactical sensors and data links providing the Operators with total situational Heigh 3.964 m [12.08 ft] Piaggio Aerospace is developing the Multirole Patrol Aircraft - MPA in partnership with • Dash at high speed (up to 350 KTAS, MMO=0.65) to distant operative theaters. -
DTI Test.Qxp
Agenda Advancing economics in business Competition as a public policy tool: what is the evidence? A key priority for the government is to increase UK productivity by extending competitive markets. Competition helps drive productivity by acting as a spur to managerial incentives and productive efficiency through ‘natural selection’ of firm entry and exit, and by promoting incentives to innovate. However, as Andrew Rees, Director, Analysis and Research, Consumer and Competition Policy, DTI, and Sasha Maguire, Economist, DTI, explain, recent evidence on these effects is perhaps less well known The UK’s competition framework is generally rated As competition can drive 1 among the best in the world by independent surveys. innovation, so can innovation and The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is technological advances boost responsible for setting the legislative and regulatory competitive pressure, as has been parameters, with enforcement conducted by two the case in the telecommunications independent competition authorities: the Office of Fair sector Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission. They are responsible for enforcing the provisions of the UK’s Product markets competition legislation—the Competition Act 1998 and the Enterprise Act 2002—which are intended to promote The UEA study took six markets for case study a pro-competitive climate, and to increase transparency investigation. The case studies were selected where it and independence in competition decisions.2 was thought there would be benefits resulting from interventions by the government or the competition Use of competition as a policy tool is promoted across authorities to enhance competition in those markets and government by a Competition Forum. -
Piaggio Aerospace Viale Generale Disegna, 1 17038 Villanova D
PIAGGIO AEROSPACE AVANTI EVO SPECIFICATIONS EXTERNAL DIMENSIONS Span 14.345 m 47.06 ft Length 14.408 m 47.27 ft Height 3.980 m 13.06 ft CABIN DIMENSIONS Height 1.75 m 5.74 ft Width 1.85 m 6.07 ft Length 4.55 m 14.92 ft Max Seating Capacity 8+2 crew Typical Executive Payload 6+1 crew BAGGAGE COMPARTMENT Volume 1.00 m3 35 ft3 Length 1.70 m 5.58 ft Maximum Weight 159 kg 350 lb PRESSURIZATION Differential 0.62 bar 9.0 psi Sea Level cabin up to 7,315 m 24,000 ft WEIGHTS Max Take-off Weight 5,489 kg 12,100 lb Max Landing Weight 5,216 kg 11,500 lb Max Zero Fuel Weight 4,445 kg 9,800 lb Standard Empty (Shuttle Configuration) 3,561 kg 7,850 lb Max Fuel Capacity 1,271 kg 2,802 lb Fuel with Max Net Payload 1,066 kg 2,350 lb Max Net Payload 794 kg 1,750 lb Net Payload with Max Fuel 589 kg 1,298 lb Max Fuel Capacity (Increased Range Config.) 1,451 kg 3,200 lb POWERPLANT 2 x Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A–66B Engines 850shp/634kW each (ISA, sea level), flat-rated from 1,630hp 2 x Hartzell five-scimitar blades low noise Propellers PERFORMANCE Maximum Speed @ 9000 lb (at 31,000ft ISA) 745 km/h 402 KTAS MMO 0.70 Mach Piaggio Aerospace Max Range (NBAA IFR, .Ferry Conf. LRC) 2,813 km 1,519 NM Viale Generale Disegna, 1 Max Range (NBAA IFR, Increased Ferry Conf. -
A Competition Regime for Growth: a Consultation on Options for Reform
A COMPETITION REGIME FOR GROWTH: A CONSULTATION ON OPTIONS FOR REFORM MARCH 2011 Explanation of the wider context for the consultation and what it seeks to achieve The Government’s overarching objective in reforming the UK’s, already world class, competition regime is to maximise the ability of the competition authorities to secure vibrant, competitive markets, in the interests of consumers and to promote productivity, innovation and economic growth. The Government is therefore consulting on changes to: o improve the robustness of decisions and strengthen the regime – enhancing the regime’s ability to resolve and deter the competition restrictions that do most harm to competition, consumers and to economic growth o support the competition authorities in taking forward high impact cases - developing the regime’s ability to target the competition restrictions that do most harm to competition, consumers and to economic growth, and providing the regime with the tools and flexibility to make proportionate and focused interventions o improve speed and predictability for business – building on the regime’s ability to take the timely, proportionate and predictable actions that limit burdens on business and that provide for the certainty that enables business to invest and innovate with confidence In this connection, the Government is consulting on a proposal to merge the competition functions of the Office of Fair Trading and the Competition Commission to create a single Competition and Markets Authority which can play a leading role in achieving the overarching objectives and delivering the desired outcomes. Issued Date: 16 March 2011 Respond by Date: 13 June 2011 Enquiries to Duncan Lawson Department for Business Innovation and Skills 3rd Floor, Orchard 2 1 Victoria Street Westminster London SW1H 0ET Tel: 0207 215 5465 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 0207 215 0480 This consultation is relevant to: Businesses of all size, economic regulatory bodies, consumer organizations, legal bodies, economic consultants and academics. -
AEROSPACE CLUSTERS World’S Best Practice and Future Perspectives an Opportunity for South Australia
0 AEROSPACE CLUSTERS World’s Best Practice and Future Perspectives An Opportunity for South Australia Matteo Paone Intern – Universita’ Commerciale Luigi Bocconi Supervisor: Nicola Sasanelli AM Director – Space Industry and R&D Collaboration Defence SA Government of South Australia September 2016 Matteo Paone, Nicola Sasanelli AEROSPACE CLUSTERS - World’s Best Practice and Future Perspectives 1 “Quod Invenias Explorans Spatium Progressus Est Humanitatis” - Human Progress is in Space Exploration Hon Jay Weatherill - Premier of South Australia Matteo Paone, Nicola Sasanelli AEROSPACE CLUSTERS - World’s Best Practice and Future Perspectives 2 Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, the conclusions and the recommendations included in it constitute the opinions of the authors and should not be taken as representative of the views of Defence SA and the South Australian Government. No warranty, express or implied is made regarding the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, reliability or usefulness of the whole or any part of the information contained in this document. You should seek your own independent expert advice and make your own enquiries and satisfy yourself of all aspects of the information contained in this document. Any use or reliance on any of information contained in this document is at your own risk in all things. The Government of South Australia and its servants and its agents disclaim all liability and responsibility (including for negligence) for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any person through using or relying on any of the information contained in this document. -
The UK Competition Regime
Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General UK competition authorities The UK competition regime HC 737 SESSION 2015-16 5 FEBRUARY 2016 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 810 people. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of £1.15 billion in 2014. UK competition authorities The UK competition regime Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 4 February 2016 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Sir Amyas Morse KCB Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 3 February 2016 HC 737 | £10.00 This report examines the UK competition regime since our report in 2010 and in the light of the government’s reforms to the regime in 2013. -
State Owned Enterprises and the Principle of Competitive Neutrality 2009
State Owned Enterprises and the Principle of Competitive Neutrality 2009 The OECD Competition Committee debated the application of competition rules to state owned enterprises and the principle of competitive neutrality in October 2009. This document includes an executive summary, a background note and an issues paper by Mr. Antonio Capobianco for the OECD and country contributions from Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Czech Republic, European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, India, Indonesia, Korea, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Chinese Taipei, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States and BIAC, as well as two aides memoires for the discussions. Due to their privileged position SOEs may negatively affect competition and it is therefore important to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible consistent with their public service responsibilities, they are subject to similar competition disciplines as private enterprises. Although enforcing competition rules against SOEs presents enforcers with particular challenges, competition rules should, and generally do, apply to both private and state-owned enterprises, subject to very limited exceptions. Competition law alone is not sufficient in ensuring a level playing field for SOEs and private enterprises, which is why policies aimed at achieving competitive neutrality between the two play an essential role. Competitive neutrality can be understood as a regulatory framework (i) within which public and private enterprises face the same set of rules and (ii) where no contact with the state brings competitive advantage to any market participant. Presence of competitive neutrality policies is of particular importance in recently liberalised sectors, where they play a crucial role in leveling the playing field between former state monopoly incumbents and private entrants.