Florida State University Libraries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

)ORULGD6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\/LEUDULHV 2021 Investigating the Role of Gankyrin in Breast Cancer and its Potential as a Novel Therapeutic Target Jessica Margaret Jarnagin Follow this and additional works at DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF GANKYRIN IN BREAST CANCER AND ITS POTENTIAL AS A NOVEL THERAPEUTIC TARGET By JESSICA MARGARET JARNAGIN A Thesis submitted to the Department of Biological Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring, 2021 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Jessica M. Jarnagin defended on April 2nd, 2021. ______________________________ Dr. Antonia Nemec Thesis Director ______________________________ Dr. Robert J. Tomko Jr. Committee Member ______________________________ Dr. Qian Yin Committee Member ______________________________ Dr. Scott Stagg Committee Member 2 INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF GANKYRIN IN BREAST CANCER AND ITS POTENTIAL AS A NOVEL THERAPEUTIC TARGET 1. ABSTRACT 4 - 5 2. INTRODUCTION: 5 - 11 2.1 BREAST CANCER 5 - 6 2.2 THE UBIQUITIN-PROTEASOME SYSTEM 6 - 8 2.3 PROTEASOME UPREGULATION IN CANCERS 8 - 11 3. METHODS: 11 - 16 3.1 CELL LINES AND PLASMID CREATION 11 - 13 3.1.1 CELL LINES 11 - 12 3.1.2 PLASMIDS - 12 3.1.3 CLONING 12 - 13 3.1.3.1 CLONING pRVYtet-off-FLAG-hsGANKYRIN 3.1.3.2 CLONING pLJM1-HA-PSMC4 AND pLJM1-HA-psmc4(337-419) 3.1.3.3 CLONING pBabe-HA-PSMC4 AND pBabe-HA-psmc4(337-419) 3.2 PROTEIN EXPRESSION 13 - 14 3.2.1 DENATURING POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS 13 - 14 3.3 MAKING RETROVIRUS WITH GP2-293 CELLS 14 - 15 3.4 RETROVIRAL INFECTION 15 3.5 PEPTIDASE ACTIVITY ASSAY 15 - 16 3.6 ANCHORAGE INDEPENDENT GROWTH 16 4. RESULTS: 16 - 25 4.1 GANKYRIN IS EXPRESSED IN FLP-IN HEK293 CELLS 16 - 17 4.2 INCREASED PEPTIDASE ACTIVITY OF FLP-IN HEK293 CELLS OVEREXPRESSING GANKYRIN 18 4.3 EXPRESSION OF FLAG-GANKYRIN IN MCF10A CELLS 19 4.4 NO CHANGE IN PEPTIDASE ACTIVITY OF MCF10A CELLS OVEREXPRESSING GANKYRIN 19 - 20 4.5 ANCHORAGE INDEPENDENCE PHENOTYPE FOR MCF10A GANKYRIN AND EMPTY VECTOR CELLS 20 4.6 EXPRESSION OF HA-PSMC4 AND HA-PSMC4(337-419) IN MCF10A CELLS 21 - 22 4.7 EXPRESSION OF HA-PSMC4 AND HA-PSMC4(337-419) IN FLP-IN HEK293 CELLS 22 - 23 4.8 INCREASED PEPTIDASE ACTIVITY OF MCF10A CELLS EXPRESSING HA-PSMC4 23 - 24 4.9 ANCHORAGE INDEPENDENCE PHENOTYPE FOR MCF10A EMPTY VECTOR, GANKYRIN, PSMC4, AND GANKYRIN + PSMC4 CELLS 24 - 25 5. DISCUSSION 25 - 29 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 29 - 30 7. REFERENCES 31 - 32 8. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: 33 8.1 TABLE 1 – PLASMIDS 33 3 1. Abstract Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and is typically accompanied by the activation of HER2, hormone receptors, and/or mutations in the BRCA genes. Treatment of breast cancer is dependent on the molecular features of the cancer, and response to treatment varies [1]. The oncogene gankyrin was found to be overexpressed in many molecular subtypes of breast cancer and correlated with poor prognosis [4]. Gankyrin is a chaperone protein that aids in the assembly of the 26S proteasome. The proteasome is a large ~70 subunit protease complex that drives cancer by destroying anti-growth and pro-death signals and is upregulated in many cancer types [25]. Because gankyrin is critical for proteasome assembly, we aimed to determine the role that gankyrin overexpression plays in contributing to proteasome upregulation. We generated both MCF10A breast epithelial cell lines and Flp-In HEK293 cell lines overexpressing gankyrin or empty vector which allowed us to test the effects of gankyrin overexpression on the peptidase activity of the proteasome and the occurrence of the anchorage independence phenotype. Using these cell lines, we conducted peptidase activity assays and determined that gankyrin overexpression leads to increased proteasome activity in Flp-In HEK293 cells. We also conducted anchorage independence assays, which showed that overexpression of gankyrin in MCF10A gankyrin cells lines led to increased occurrence of anchorage independence phenotypes. Additionally, during proteasome assembly gankyrin binds to the subunit PSMC4 and functions to prevent premature docking of PSMC4 onto the core particle, so we created a minimal part of PSMC4 (psmc4(337-419)) that sequesters gankyrin to interfere with proteasome assembly in a method called gankyrin trapping [2]. We attempted to generate both MCF10A cell lines and Flp-In HEK293 cell lines that expressed either gankyrin or empty vector and psmc4(337-419), PSMC4, or an empty pBabe or pLJM1 plasmid. However, the retroviral infection of Flp-In HEK293 cells with virus containing these plasmids was unsuccessful. Also, 4 HA-psmc4(337-419) was undetectable in MCF10A cells. Using the cell lines that were successfully created with full-length PSMC4, we conducted peptidase activity assays and anchorage independence assays which showed that overexpression of PSMC4 in MCF10A gankyrin cell lines led to increased proteasome activity and an increased occurrence of the anchorage independent growth phenotype. This data indicates that gankyrin-trapping with full length PSMC4 is not a valid mechanism for decreasing oncogenic activity. Altogether, this study indicates the significance of the role of gankyrin overexpression in proteasome upregulation, and that gankyrin is potentially a valid target for proteasome inhibition. 2. Introduction 2.1 Breast Cancer Breast cancer is the second most common cancer found in women and is characterized by malignancies of the breast tissue. The main components of this disease are mutations of BRCA genes, activation of estrogen and/or progesterone receptors, and the activation of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) encoded by the gene ERBB2 [1]. Breast cancer can either develop sporadically or be genetically linked, however only 10% of breast cancers are inherited [5]. If treated in the early stages of carcinogenesis prior to metastasis, there is a 70-80% chance of full recovery. However advanced/metastatic breast cancer is currently considered incurable [1]. The most commonly amplified genes are often targeted for treatment development, and include TP53, PTEN, ERBB2, BRCA 1/2, and FGFR1 [6]. Over the last 20 years, treatment of breast cancer has had improved outcomes due to the current focus on the heterogeneity of the disease. Treatments have evolved to target the specific combination of BRCA mutations, estrogen/progesterone receptor activation, and HER2 activation that exists in each person diagnosed with the disease. However, studies have shown that most breast cancers are caused by 5 the accumulation of many mutations, which can make targeting treatments difficult to develop [7]. Thus, it is crucial to develop new therapies independent of mutation status. Recently, the oncogene gankyrin, a chaperone protein that aids in the assembly of the proteasome, was found to be upregulated in breast tumors and its overexpression in breast epithelial cell lines induced a tumorigenic phenotype. Gankyrin overexpression occurs in the early stages of breast cancer and is correlated to poor prognosis and metastasis [33]. Although it was found to be associated with HER2 expression, gankyrin overexpression was found in breast cancer regardless of HER2 and ER/PR status, including triple-negative breast cancer, an aggressive cancer with poor treatment options and prognosis [4] [34]. 2.2 The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is the primary mechanism for protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. Proteins that are destined for degradation are modified by the addition of a chain of the protein ubiquitin (Ub). The polyubiquitin (polyUb) chain signals the protein for delivery to the 26S proteasome. Figure 1. Structure of the Human 26S Proteasome The proteasome consists of two main parts: the 19S regulatory particle (RP) and the 20S core particle (CP). The RP is responsible for binding incoming 6 substrates, removing the polyubiquitin chain, unfolding the substrate, and translocating it into the interior of the CP. The CP houses the peptidase active sites in its interior and cleaves the substrate into short peptides. The proteasome is a large 2.5 mDa multi-subunit protease that can be divided into the 19S regulatory particle (RP) and 20S core particle (CP) (Figure 1). The RP can be further divided into the RP lid and RP base. The RP lid consists of nine regulatory particle non-ATPase subunits, and deubiquinates the substrate. The RP base is made up of a heterohexameric ATPase ring and four non-ATPase subunits. The base unfolds the substrate using energy derived from ATP. The CP consists of four stacked heteroheptameric rings resulting in the formation of a barrel-like shape. The peptidase active sites are located within the CP and cleave the substrate into short peptides [2] These peptidase active sites include the PSMB5 subunit which has chymotrypsin- like activity, as it cleaves after amino acids with hydrophobic side chains; the PSMB6 subunit which has caspase-like activity, as it cleaves after amino acids with acidic side chains; and the PSMB7 subunit which has trypsin-like activity, as it cleaves after amino acids with basic side chains [32]. The proteasome contains ~70 subunits that must assemble correctly in order to function properly. Proteasome assembly is driven by intrinsic features of several proteasome subunits themselves, as well as extrinsic, dedicated assembly chaperone proteins. This process is highly regulated, but not well understood. The assembly of the RP base subcomplex is aided by four chaperone proteins under normal growth: PAAF1, gankyrin, S5b, and p27 (Rpn14, Nas6, Hsm3, and Nas2 in yeast, respectively). These chaperones function in part to stabilize base assembly intermediates, and to regulate attachment of the lid and CP to the base. However, the mechanism by which they are evicted to form mature proteasomes is not well understood. Gankyrin has a long crescent-like shape that allows it to bind to the C-terminus of the ATPase base subunit PSMC4.
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Protein Clearance Mechanisms in Organismal Ageing and Age-Related Diseases

    The Role of Protein Clearance Mechanisms in Organismal Ageing and Age-Related Diseases

    REVIEW Received 18 Mar 2014 | Accepted 24 Oct 2014 | Published 8 Dec 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6659 The role of protein clearance mechanisms in organismal ageing and age-related diseases David Vilchez1, Isabel Saez1 & Andrew Dillin2,3 The ability to maintain a functional proteome, or proteostasis, declines during the ageing process. Damaged and misfolded proteins accumulate with age, impairing cell function and tissue homeostasis. The accumulation of damaged proteins contributes to multiple age- related diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s or Huntington’s disease. Damaged proteins are degraded by the ubiquitin–proteasome system or through autophagy-lysosome, key components of the proteostasis network. Modulation of either proteasome activity or autophagic-lysosomal potential extends lifespan and protects organisms from symptoms associated with proteostasis disorders, suggesting that protein clearance mechanisms are directly linked to ageing and age-associated diseases. he integrity of the proteome, or proteostasis, is challenged during the ageing process. Damaged proteins accumulate as a consequence of ageing and may ensue from the Taccumulation of reactive oxygen species and a progressive decline in the ability to maintain a functional proteome1. This demise in proteostasis is considered one of the hallmarks of ageing1 and contributes to multiple age-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s (AD)2, Parkinson’s (PD)3 or Huntington’s disease (HD)4. Proteostasis is maintained by a network of cellular mechanisms that monitors folding, concentration, cellular localization and interactions of proteins from their synthesis through their degradation5. Chaperones assure the proper folding of proteins throughout their life cycle and under stress conditions but their activity declines with age (reviewed in refs 6–10).
  • Produktinformation

    Produktinformation

    Produktinformation Diagnostik & molekulare Diagnostik Laborgeräte & Service Zellkultur & Verbrauchsmaterial Forschungsprodukte & Biochemikalien Weitere Information auf den folgenden Seiten! See the following pages for more information! Lieferung & Zahlungsart Lieferung: frei Haus Bestellung auf Rechnung SZABO-SCANDIC Lieferung: € 10,- HandelsgmbH & Co KG Erstbestellung Vorauskassa Quellenstraße 110, A-1100 Wien T. +43(0)1 489 3961-0 Zuschläge F. +43(0)1 489 3961-7 [email protected] • Mindermengenzuschlag www.szabo-scandic.com • Trockeneiszuschlag • Gefahrgutzuschlag linkedin.com/company/szaboscandic • Expressversand facebook.com/szaboscandic PSMD10 Antibody, Biotin conjugated Product Code CSB-PA018899LD01HU Abbreviation 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 10 Storage Upon receipt, store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze. Uniprot No. O75832 Immunogen Recombinant Human 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 10 protein (1-226AA) Raised In Rabbit Species Reactivity Human Tested Applications ELISA Relevance Acts as a chaperone during the assembly of the 26S proteasome, specifically of the PA700/19S regulatory complex (RC). In the initial step of the base subcomplex assembly is part of an intermediate PSMD10:PSMC4:PSMC5:PAAF1 module which probably assembles with a PSMD5:PSMC2:PSMC1:PSMD2 module. Independently of the proteasome, regulates EGF-induced AKT activation through inhibition of the RHOA/ROCK/PTEN pahway, leading to prolonged AKT activation. Plays an important role in RAS-induced tumorigenesis. Acts as an proto-oncoprotein by being involved in negative regulation of tumor suppressors RB1 and p53/TP53. Overexpression is leading to phosphorylation of RB1 and proteasomal degradation of RB1. Regulates CDK4-mediated phosphorylation of RB1 by competing with CDKN2A for binding with CDK4. Facilitates binding of MDM2 to p53/TP53 and the mono- and polyubiquitination of p53/TP53 by MDM2 suggesting a function in targeting the TP53:MDM2 complex to the 26S proteasome.
  • PSMD10 Antibody (Center) Purified Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody (Pab) Catalog # AW5126

    PSMD10 Antibody (Center) Purified Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody (Pab) Catalog # AW5126

    10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 PSMD10 Antibody (Center) Purified Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody (Pab) Catalog # AW5126 Specification PSMD10 Antibody (Center) - Product Information Application IF, WB, IHC-P,E Primary Accession O75832 Other Accession Q9Z2X2 Reactivity Human Predicted Mouse Host Rabbit Clonality Polyclonal Calculated MW H=24,16;M=25;Ra t=25 KDa Isotype Rabbit Ig Antigen Source HUMAN PSMD10 Antibody (Center) - Additional Information Gene ID 5716 Fluorescent image of Hela cells stained with PSMD10 Antibody (Center)(Cat#AW5126). Antigen Region AW5126 was diluted at 1:25 dilution. An 43-76 Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit lgG at 1:400 dilution was used as the Other Names secondary antibody (green). Cytoplasmic 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 10, 26S proteasome regulatory actin was counterstained with Alexa Fluor® subunit p28, Gankyrin, p28(GANK), PSMD10 555 conjugated with Phalloidin (red). Dilution IF~~1:25 WB~~ 1:1000 IHC-P~~1:25 Target/Specificity This PSMD10 antibody is generated from a rabbit immunized with a KLH conjugated synthetic peptide between 43-76 amino acids from the Central region of human PSMD10. Format Purified polyclonal antibody supplied in PBS with 0.09% (W/V) sodium azide. This antibody is purified through a protein A column, followed by peptide affinity purification. Western blot analysis of lysates from MCF-7, PC-3, K562 cell line (from left to right), using Storage PSMD10 Antibody (Center)(Cat. #AW5126). Page 1/3 10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 Maintain refrigerated at 2-8°C for up to 2 AW5126 was diluted at 1:1000 at each lane.
  • A High Resolution Physical and RH Map of Pig Chromosome 6Q1.2 And

    A High Resolution Physical and RH Map of Pig Chromosome 6Q1.2 And

    A high resolution physical and RH map of pig chromosome 6q1.2 and comparative analysis with human chromosome 19q13.1 Flávia Martins-Wess, Denis Milan, Cord Drögemüller, Rodja Voβ-Nemitz, Bertram Brenig, Annie Robic, Martine Yerle, Tosso Leeb To cite this version: Flávia Martins-Wess, Denis Milan, Cord Drögemüller, Rodja Voβ-Nemitz, Bertram Brenig, et al.. A high resolution physical and RH map of pig chromosome 6q1.2 and comparative analysis with human chromosome 19q13.1. BMC Genomics, BioMed Central, 2003, 4, pp.435-444. 10.1186/1471-2164-4- 20. hal-02680244 HAL Id: hal-02680244 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02680244 Submitted on 31 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. BMC Genomics BioMed Central Research article Open Access A high resolution physical and RH map of pig chromosome 6q1.2 and comparative analysis with human chromosome 19q13.1 Flávia Martins-Wess1, Denis Milan*2, Cord Drögemüller1, Rodja Voβ- Nemitz1, Bertram Brenig3, Annie Robic2, Martine Yerle2 and Tosso Leeb*1 Address: 1Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, School of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17p, 30559 Hannover, Germany, 2Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, BP27, 31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France and 3Institute of Veterinary Medicine, University of Göttingen, Groner Landstr.
  • A Peripheral Blood Gene Expression Signature to Diagnose Subclinical Acute Rejection

    A Peripheral Blood Gene Expression Signature to Diagnose Subclinical Acute Rejection

    CLINICAL RESEARCH www.jasn.org A Peripheral Blood Gene Expression Signature to Diagnose Subclinical Acute Rejection Weijia Zhang,1 Zhengzi Yi,1 Karen L. Keung,2 Huimin Shang,3 Chengguo Wei,1 Paolo Cravedi,1 Zeguo Sun,1 Caixia Xi,1 Christopher Woytovich,1 Samira Farouk,1 Weiqing Huang,1 Khadija Banu,1 Lorenzo Gallon,4 Ciara N. Magee,5 Nader Najafian,5 Milagros Samaniego,6 Arjang Djamali ,7 Stephen I. Alexander,2 Ivy A. Rosales,8 Rex Neal Smith,8 Jenny Xiang,3 Evelyne Lerut,9 Dirk Kuypers,10,11 Maarten Naesens ,10,11 Philip J. O’Connell,2 Robert Colvin,8 Madhav C. Menon,1 and Barbara Murphy1 Due to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are listed at the end of this article. ABSTRACT Background In kidney transplant recipients, surveillance biopsies can reveal, despite stable graft function, histologic features of acute rejection and borderline changes that are associated with undesirable graft outcomes. Noninvasive biomarkers of subclinical acute rejection are needed to avoid the risks and costs associated with repeated biopsies. Methods We examined subclinical histologic and functional changes in kidney transplant recipients from the prospective Genomics of Chronic Allograft Rejection (GoCAR) study who underwent surveillance biopsies over 2 years, identifying those with subclinical or borderline acute cellular rejection (ACR) at 3 months (ACR-3) post-transplant. We performed RNA sequencing on whole blood collected from 88 indi- viduals at the time of 3-month surveillance biopsy to identify transcripts associated with ACR-3, developed a novel sequencing-based targeted expression assay, and validated this gene signature in an independent cohort.
  • Differential Network As an Indicator of Osteoporosis with Network Entropy

    Differential Network As an Indicator of Osteoporosis with Network Entropy

    328 EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 16: 328-332, 2018 Differential network as an indicator of osteoporosis with network entropy LILI MA, HONGMEI DU and GUANGDONG CHEN Department of Orthopaedics, Hebei Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei 061001, P.R. China Received October 20, 2017; Accepted May 10, 2018 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6169 Abstract. Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disorder charac- of osteoporosis (2,3). It is regarded that an increase of PBM terized by a decrease in bone mass and density. The peak bone by one standard deviation would reduce the fracture risk by mass (PBM) is a significant determinant of osteoporosis. To 50% (4). gain insights into the indicating effect of PBM to osteoporosis, Peripheral blood monocytes can serve as early precursors of this study focused on characterizing the PBM networks and osteoclasts (5-7). A growing body of literature has explored that identifying key genes. One biological data set with 12 mono- blood monocytes deliver many kinds of factors for bone metab- cyte low PBM samples and 11 high PBM samples was derived olism, such as interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α (8). to construct protein-protein interaction networks (PPINs). Osteoclasts in peripheral skeleton (9) and the central skeleton Based on clique-merging, module-identification algorithm was come from circulating monocytes (10). Substantial research used to identify modules from PPINs. The systematic calcu- has focused on the effect of circulating monocytes on patho- lation and comparison were performed to test whether the genesis of osteoporosis in young and middle aged adults. network entropy can discriminate the low PBM network from Research in systems biology has shown that variety in the high PBM network.
  • The Kinesin Spindle Protein Inhibitor Filanesib Enhances the Activity of Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma

    The Kinesin Spindle Protein Inhibitor Filanesib Enhances the Activity of Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma

    Plasma Cell Disorders SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX The kinesin spindle protein inhibitor filanesib enhances the activity of pomalidomide and dexamethasone in multiple myeloma Susana Hernández-García, 1 Laura San-Segundo, 1 Lorena González-Méndez, 1 Luis A. Corchete, 1 Irena Misiewicz- Krzeminska, 1,2 Montserrat Martín-Sánchez, 1 Ana-Alicia López-Iglesias, 1 Esperanza Macarena Algarín, 1 Pedro Mogollón, 1 Andrea Díaz-Tejedor, 1 Teresa Paíno, 1 Brian Tunquist, 3 María-Victoria Mateos, 1 Norma C Gutiérrez, 1 Elena Díaz- Rodriguez, 1 Mercedes Garayoa 1* and Enrique M Ocio 1* 1Centro Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (CSIC-USAL) and Hospital Universitario-IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain; 2National Medicines Insti - tute, Warsaw, Poland and 3Array BioPharma, Boulder, Colorado, USA *MG and EMO contributed equally to this work ©2017 Ferrata Storti Foundation. This is an open-access paper. doi:10.3324/haematol. 2017.168666 Received: March 13, 2017. Accepted: August 29, 2017. Pre-published: August 31, 2017. Correspondence: [email protected] MATERIAL AND METHODS Reagents and drugs. Filanesib (F) was provided by Array BioPharma Inc. (Boulder, CO, USA). Thalidomide (T), lenalidomide (L) and pomalidomide (P) were purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA), dexamethasone (D) from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) and bortezomib from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA, USA). Generic chemicals were acquired from Sigma Chemical Co., Roche Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany), Merck & Co., Inc. (Darmstadt, Germany). MM cell lines, patient samples and cultures. Origin, authentication and in vitro growth conditions of human MM cell lines have already been characterized (17, 18). The study of drug activity in the presence of IL-6, IGF-1 or in co-culture with primary bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs) or the human mesenchymal stromal cell line (hMSC–TERT) was performed as described previously (19, 20).
  • Proteasome Network in Prostate Carcinoma

    Proteasome Network in Prostate Carcinoma

    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2011) 14, 38–45 & 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1365-7852/11 www.nature.com/pcan ORIGINAL ARTICLE Transcription alterations of members of the ubiquitin–proteasome network in prostate carcinoma OJC Hellwinkel1,2,5, LE Asong3,5, J-P Rogmann3,HSu¨ ltmann4, C Wagner2, T Schlomm2 and C Eichelberg3 1Department of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2Martini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 3Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany and 4Working Group Cancer Genome Research, Division of Molecular Genetics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany The purpose of this work was to investigate the role of the ubiquitin–proteasome network (UPN) in prostate cancer (PCA) and to elicit potential markers for this disease. The UPN represents a key factor in the maintenance of cellular homoeostasis as a result of its fundamental function in the regulation of intracellular protein degradation. Members of this network have a role in the biology of haematological and solid tumours. Tumour cells and normal epithelial cells from 22 prostatectomy specimens were isolated by laser microdissection. Prostate biopsy samples from healthy individuals served for technical calibration and as controls. Transcript levels of eight selected genes with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity (labelling target proteins for proteasome degradation) and two genes belonging to the proteasome–multienzyme complex itself were analysed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The proteasome genes PSMC4 and PSMB5 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase NEDD4L were significantly and coherently upregulated in PCA cells compared with the corresponding adjacent normal prostate tissue.
  • The Human Homologue of the RNA Polymerase II-Associated Factor 1 (Hpaf1), Localized on the 19Q13 Amplicon, Is Associated with Tumorigenesis

    The Human Homologue of the RNA Polymerase II-Associated Factor 1 (Hpaf1), Localized on the 19Q13 Amplicon, Is Associated with Tumorigenesis

    Oncogene (2006) 25, 3247–3257 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9232/06 $30.00 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE The human homologue of the RNA polymerase II-associated factor 1 (hPaf1), localized on the 19q13 amplicon, is associated with tumorigenesis N Moniaux1,4, C Nemos1,4, BM Schmied2, SC Chauhan1, S Deb1, K Morikane2, A Choudhury1, M VanLith2, M Sutherlin2, JM Sikela3, MA Hollingsworth1,2 and SK Batra1,2 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA; 2Eppley Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA and 3Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA The 19q13 amplicon in pancreatic cancer cells contains a somes, chromosomal translocations, and gene amplifi- novel pancreatic differentiation 2 (PD2) gene (accession cations, induce a transformed phenotype leading to number AJ401156), which was identified by differential cancer. These genetic alterations constitute key events screening analysis. PD2 is the human homologue of the contributing to tumor progression and metastasis. They RNA polymerase II-associated factor 1 (hPaf1). In yeast, are often stabilized when they confer a growth or Paf1 is part of the transcription machinery, acting as a survivaladvantage to the cells(Lengauer et al., 1998). docking protein in between the complexes Rad6-Bre1, Gene amplification (HSR, homogeneously staining COMPASS-Dot1p, and the phosphorylated carboxyl region and DM, double minute) is one of the most terminal domain of the RNA polymerase II. As such, important mechanisms leading to the alteration of gene Paf1 is directly involved in transcription elongation via expression in solid tumors.
  • Proteasome Dysfunction Induces Muscle Growth Defects and Protein Aggregation

    Proteasome Dysfunction Induces Muscle Growth Defects and Protein Aggregation

    ß 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2014) 127, 5204–5217 doi:10.1242/jcs.150961 RESEARCH ARTICLE Proteasome dysfunction induces muscle growth defects and protein aggregation Yasuo Kitajima1,2,§, Yoshitaka Tashiro3,`,§, Naoki Suzuki1,*,§,", Hitoshi Warita1, Masaaki Kato1, Maki Tateyama1, Risa Ando1, Rumiko Izumi1, Maya Yamazaki4, Manabu Abe4, Kenji Sakimura4, Hidefumi Ito5, Makoto Urushitani3, Ryoichi Nagatomi2, Ryosuke Takahashi3 and Masashi Aoki1," ABSTRACT rate-limiting enzymes (Glass, 2010; Jagoe and Goldberg, 2001). Proteasomal proteolysis is important in several organs; for The ubiquitin–proteasome and autophagy–lysosome pathways are example, proteasome inhibition using MG-132 leads to the the two major routes of protein and organelle clearance. The role of cytoplasmic aggregation of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP- the proteasome pathway in mammalian muscle has not been 43) in cultured hippocampal and cortical neurons and in examined in vivo. In this study, we report that the muscle-specific immortalized motor neurons (van Eersel et al., 2011). Similarly, deletion of a crucial proteasomal gene, Rpt3 (also known as the depletion of the 26S proteasome in mouse brain neurons Psmc4), resulted in profound muscle growth defects and a causes neurodegeneration (Bedford et al., 2008). decrease in force production in mice. Specifically, developing The loss of skeletal muscle mass in humans at an older age, muscles in conditional Rpt3-knockout animals showed which is called sarcopenia, is a rapidly growing health issue dysregulated proteasomal activity. The autophagy pathway was worldwide (Vellas et al., 2013). The regulation of skeletal muscle upregulated, but the process of autophagosome formation was mass largely depends on protein synthesis and degradation impaired.
  • Supplementary Table 4: the Association of the 26S Proteasome

    Supplementary Table 4: the Association of the 26S Proteasome

    Supplementary Material (ESI) for Molecular BioSystems This journal is (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2009 Supplementary Table 4: The association of the 26S proteasome and tumor progression/metastasis Note: the associateion between cancer and the 26S proteasome genes has been manually checked in PubMed a) GSE2514 (Lung cancer, 20 tumor and 19 normal samples; 25 out of 43 26S proteasome genes were mapped on the microarray platform. FWER p-value: 0.02) Entrez GeneID Gene Symbol RANK METRIC SCORE* Genes have been reported in cancer 10213 PSMD14 0.288528293 5710 PSMD4 0.165639699 Kim et al., Mol Cancer Res., 6:426, 2008 5713 PSMD7 0.147187442 5721 PSME2 0.130215749 5717 PSMD11 0.128598183 Deng et al., Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 104:1067, 2007 5704 PSMC4 0.123157509 5706 PSMC6 0.115970835 5716 PSMD10 0.112173758 Mayer et al., Biochem Society Transaction, 34:746, 2006 5700 PSMC1 0.0898761 Kim et al., Mol Cancer Res., 6:426, 2008 5701 PSMC2 0.081513479 Cui et al., Proteomics, 6:498, 2005 5709 PSMD3 0.071682706 5719 PSMD13 0.071118504 7415 VCP 0.060464829 9861 PSMD6 0.055711303 Ren et al., Oncogene, 19:1419, 2000 5720 PSME1 0.052469168 5714 PSMD8 0.047414459 Deng et al., Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 104:1067, 2007 5702 PSMC3 0.046327863 Pollice et al., JBC, 279:6345, 2003 6184 RPN1 0.043426223 55559 UCHL5IP 0.041885283 5705 PSMC5 0.041615516 5715 PSMD9 0.033147983 5711 PSMD5 0.030562362 Deng et al., Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 104:1067, 2007 10197 PSME3 0.015149679 Roessler et al., Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 5:2092, 2006 5718 PSMD12 -0.00983229 Cui et al., Proteomics, 6:498, 2005 9491 PSMF1 -0.069156095 *Positive rank metric score represent that a gene is highly expressed in tumors.
  • Is a Cell Survival Regulator in Pancreatic Cancer with 19Q13 Amplification

    Is a Cell Survival Regulator in Pancreatic Cancer with 19Q13 Amplification

    Research Article Intersex-like (IXL) Is a Cell Survival Regulator in Pancreatic Cancer with 19q13 Amplification Riina Kuuselo,1 Kimmo Savinainen,1 David O. Azorsa,2 Gargi D. Basu,2 Ritva Karhu,1 Sukru Tuzmen,2 Spyro Mousses,2 and Anne Kallioniemi1 1Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Medical Technology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland and 2Pharmaceutical Genomics Division, The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Scottsdale, Arizona Abstract 5-year survival rate for pancreatic cancer is <5% and the median survival is <6 months (2, 3). Even for patients who undergo Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive disease characterized potentially curative resection, the 5-year survival rate is only by poor prognosis and vast genetic instability. Recent micro- f array-based, genome-wide surveys have identified multiple 20% (2). recurrent copy number aberrations in pancreatic cancer; Aneuploidy and increased genetic instability manifesting as however, the target genes are, for the most part, unknown. complex genetic aberrations, such as losses, gains, and amplifica- Here, we characterized the 19q13 amplicon in pancreatic tions, are common features of pancreatic cancer (4, 5). These cancer to identify putative new drug targets. Copy number genetic alterations are likely to conceal genes involved in disease increases at 19q13 were quantitated in 16 pancreatic cancer pathogenesis, and uncovering such genes might thus provide cell lines and 31 primary tumors by fluorescence in situ targets for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic hybridization. Cell line copy number data delineated a 1.1 Mb tools. In particular, gene amplification is a common mechanism for activating oncogenes, and other growth-promoting genes in cancer amplicon, the presence of which was also validated in 10% of primary pancreatic tumors.