5353 W Pico Blvd LOS ANGELES, CA 90019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Confronting Sa-I-Gu: Twenty Years After the Los Angeles Riots
【특집】 Confronting Sa-i-gu: Twenty Years after the Los Angeles Riots Edward Taehan Chang (the Young Oak Kim Center for Korean American Studies) Twenty years ago on April 29, Los Angeles erupted and Koreatown cried as it burned. For six-days, the LAPD was missing in action as rioting, looting, burning, and killing devastated the city. The “not guilty” Rodney King verdict ignited anger and frustration felt by South Los Angeles residents who suffered from years of neglect, despair, hopelessness, injustice, and oppression.1) In the Korean American community, the Los Angeles riot is remembered as Sa-i-gu (April 29 in Korean). Korean Americans suffered disproportionately high economic losses as 2,280 Korean American businesses were looted or burned with $400 million in property damages.2) Without any political clout and power in the city, Koreatown was unprotected and left to burn since it was not a priority for city politicians and 1) Rodney King was found dead in his own swimming pool on June 17, 2012, shortly after publishing his autobiography The Riot Within: My Journey from Rebellion to Redemption Learning How We Can All Get Along, in April 2012. 2) Korea Daily Los Angeles, May 11, 1992. 2 Edward Taehan Chang the LAPD. For the Korean American community, Sa-i-gu is known as its most important historical event, a “turning point,” “watershed event,” or “wake-up call.” Sa-i-gu profoundly altered the Korean American discourse, igniting debates and dialogue in search of new directions.3) The riot served as a catalyst to critically examine what it meant to be Korean American in relation to multicultural politics and race, economics and ideology. -
East Los Angeles Should Not Be Lumped with the Hollywood Hills, Si
East Los Angeles Should Not Be Lumped with the Hollywood Hills, Si... Subject: East Los Angeles Should Not Be Lumped with the Hollywood Hills, Silver Lake, and Los Feliz! From: Franziska WiƩenstein < Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:47:52 -0700 To: Commissioners, CiƟzens RedistricƟng Commission 901 P Street, Suite 154-A Sacramento, CA 95814 Commissioners: When you Commissioners were picked, many of us in Los Angeles (and many in the media) were concerned that none of you lived in the City of Los Angeles. We were told not to worry, that you understood the region and would draw fair maps. We’ve also been told, throughout the process, that the era of odd-shaped, gerrymandered districts, featuring odd pairings of communiƟes, were over. Then, in your iniƟal draŌ maps, you proposed a district lumping together the Hollywood Hills, Los Feliz, Silver Lake, and East Los Angeles! To get there, the district lines cross the Los Angeles River and dart around Downtown Los Angeles, making the district as bizarrely shaped as anything the poliƟcians ever drew. It will be extremely difficult for whomever is in elected in that district to represent those communiƟes. Those communiƟes are as different as can be. We, the undersigned, strongly urge you to draw more sensible maps. East Los Angeles (and Lincoln Heights, etc.) should be together with other eastside communiƟes so that residents there can elect a repeƟƟve of their choosing. The communiƟes of Hollywood Hills, Los Feliz, and Silver Lake are not “eastside.” No porƟon of those communiƟes are east of Downtown or east of the Los Angeles River. -
City of West Hollywood Appendix J
R2, R3, R4 Multi-Family Survey Report City of West Hollywood Appendix J: 1986-87 Survey Context, prepared by Johnson Heumann Research Associates Appendices November 2008 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP Architects, Planners & Conservators, Inc. when a small group of citizens formed the West Hollywood Incorporation Committee. By November of that year, studies by the Local Agency Formation Commission confirmed that incorporation was indeed economically feasible. Tenants led by the Coalition for Economic Survival, homeowners concerned with planning issues and the gay community were among the leading advocates of cityhoog. Formal application was made on April 4, 1984. On November 4, 1984, by a 4:1 favorable margin, the voters approved incorporation . One of the new city's first tasks was to begin to draft a General Plan , the land use policy document for the municipality required· by State law. In January of 1985, the city began the process of preparing the Plan, noting that the physical environment, social character and quality of life within the City would be influenced by the General Plan. It was a stated goal to link land use and urban design, emphasizing the relationship between parcels and uses throughout the city. A reduction of density from those outlined in the West Hollywood Community Plan, .---- prepared before incorporated by the County of Los Angeles, was planned. As an i ntegral part of this planning process. the city of West Hollywood applied for c survey grant from the State Off ice of Historic Preservation in November of 1985 . 1.2 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY The area now known as West Hollywood has played a key role in t h e development of Los Angeles County west of Los Angeles . -
South Carthay PP Draft.Indd
South Carthay HPOZ Preservation Plan City of Los Angeles Adopted December 9, 2010 Preservation Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1: 5 Mission Statement Chapter 2: 7 Goals & Objectives Chapter 3: 9 Function of the Plan Chapter 4: 17 Context Statement Chapter 5: 21 Historic Resources Survey Chapter 6: 23 Architectural Styles Chapter 7 41 Residential Rehabilitation Chapter 8: 57 Residential Additions Chapter 9: 61 Residential In-fi ll Chapter 10: 71 Public Realm Chapter 11: 75 Defi nitions 3 4 Preservation Plan Chapter 1 Mission Statement acilitate the vitality of the district as a livable and sustainable Fneighborhood through the restoration, preservation and enhancement of structures, landscaping and natural features. 5 6 Preservation Plan Chapter 2 Goals & Objectives Goal 1 Preserve The Historic Character Of The Community Objective 1.1 Safeguard the character of historic buildings and sites Objective 1.2 Recognize and protect the historic streetscape and development patterns Objective 1.3 Ensure rehabilitation and new construction within the district complements the historic fabric Objective 1.4 Recognize that the preservation of the character of the district as a whole takes precedence over the treatment of individual structures or sites. Goal 2 Preserve The Historic Streetscape Objective 2.1 Encourage and maintain traditional front yards. Objective 2.2 Promote retention of historic landscape features Goal 3 Preserve The Historic Appearance Of Residential Structures Objective 3.1 Encourage retention of signifi cant architectural features Goal -
Btc BETTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 201 N
btc BETTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 201 N. Los Angeles St., Ste.13A 14540 SylvanSt., Ste; A . Los Angeles, CA .90012 · VanNuys, CA 91411 (213} 617-9600 {818) 779~8866 Fa,Y. {213) 517-9643 Fax(818) 779-8870 MAILING AFFIDAVIT City PlanQing Commission Deputy Ad\lisory Agency Case No. ______ Tentative Traer No. ______ Parcel Map No.------~ Zoning Administrator· ·Private Street No. ______ Case No. ______ Coastal Permit Area Planning Commission Case No.-----'-- Central, Harbor, SV, ELA, SLA, WLA, NV Case No.---------- Design Review Board Case No. ______ siTEAC l o~'1 ~oR..~ S'-\~~VY\o~€. ~~~-r- t, _\_·_ &-,.~,-<t· certrfy that I am an employee of BTC ~contractor of the Crty of Los Anqeles. Department of City Planning, State of California, and I drd, on the d.\~ day of ;::::)f'«<v.._y>.Q...'( 20H mail, postage prepaid, to the applicant and all parties required by the Municipal Code,·as detailed on the official ownership list, a notice of hearing, a true copy of which is attached. · .X' 500-foot radius --'---,--Abutting the subject site __,....-"'- __ Owners and Occupants ____ Tenant Notice ____ 100-foot coastal notice --cc,.--State Coastal Commission -~)(-'::--'-. Adjacent City (ies) _ ___!0><'~- Applicant and Representative (where indicated) _city_ Newspaper Notice · X" LA Unified School District, LA County Regional Planning Y Caltrans --;:---,--- Council's Own Initiative __Y~-- Metropolitan Transit Authority -~><'2?--- Certified Neighborhood Council (dept of Neighborhood Empowerment) X Council Office and Council District Office _city_ Homeowners Associations >< Other \)~ (:%: \?W:: Ll) Z:)J (:::> 'T &r->.~'E:,"('{ There is a regular daily communication and service by mail between the City of Los Angeles and each of the A~J: ~were mailed. -
Office Deliveries Continue for Central Los Angeles
Research & Forecast Report CENTRAL LOS ANGELES | OFFICE Accelerating success. Q2 2017 >> Office Deliveries Continue for Central Los Angeles Key Takeaways Market Indicators | Relative to prior period > Delivery momentum continued in the second quarter with Q2 2017 Forecast J.H. Snyder's 1601 N. Vine St. delivering 115,600 square feet Vacancy (SF) to the market. This leaves 152,500 SF of office product Net Absorption under construction and 811,000 SF of expected proposed Construction construction in the Hollywood submarket. Rental Rate > The average rent for Class A buildings in Central Los Ange- les is $3.42 per square foot (PSF) Full Service Gross (FSG), a 0.7% decrease year-over-year. Summary Statistics | Central Los Angeles, Q2 2017 > Vacancy decreased 10 basis points from one quarter ago Class A Class B All Classes recording 18.0%. Vacancy Rate 12.2% 23.1% 18.0% Change from Q1 ‘17 > Leasing activity rose from last quarter's 122,100 SF total to -110 +80 -10 record 273,300 SF. (Basis Points) Net Absorption* 167.5 -53.4 112.2 > Investment activity consisted of Hudson Pacific acquiring Construction Completions* 115.6 0.0 115.6 Hollywood Center Studios for $200,000,000 ($542 PSF). Under Construction* 152.5 60.5 213.0 *SF, Thousands Central Los Angeles Office Market Asking Rents | Central Los Angeles, Q2 2017 The Central Los Angeles market saw moderate demand activ- ity during second quarter with vacancy decreasing by 10 basis Class A Class B All Classes points from last quarter, and absorption closing at 112,200 SF Average Asking Rent $3.42 $2.48 $2.75 Change from Q1 ‘17 for the quarter. -
West Los Angeles Rents Continue to Rise
Research & Forecast Report WEST LOS ANGELES | OFFICE Accelerating success. Q2 2019 >> West Los Angeles Rents Continue to Rise Key Takeaways Market Indicators | Relative to Prior Period > The average asking monthly rent for West Los Angeles Q2 2019 Forecast sustained its second straight quarter of $0.10 increases, Vacancy moving to $4.92 per square foot (PSF) full service gross Net Absorption (FSG). Construction > Demand recorded 315,900 square feet, the ninth straight Rental Rate quarter of positive absorption. > No new projects delivered from the under-construction pipeline. A total of 18 buildings remain in the pipeline. Summary Statistics | West Los Angeles, Q2 2019 > Investment activity maintained momentum with four Class A Class B All Classes properties trading, highlighted by Onni Group’s long-awaited Vacancy Rate 13.4% 9.4% 12.4% acquisition of Wilshire Courtyard. Change from Q1 ‘19 -40 +80 -60 > Leasing activity recorded 1,348,500 square feet, marking (Basis Points) six consecutive quarters of velocity exceeding 1.1 million Net Absorption* +208.5 +92.4 +315.9 square feet. Century City, Culver City and Beverly Hills drove Construction Completions* 0.0 0.0 0.0 velocity for the quarter. Under Construction* 1,273.5 694.6 1,968.1 *SF, Thousands West Los Angeles Office Market Asking Rents | West Los Angeles, Q2 2019 Vacancy in the West L.A. market dropped by 60 basis points from the previous quarter, driven by absorption gains in Class A Class B All Classes Santa Monica and Brentwood. High leasing activity from legal, Average Asking Rent $4.93 $4.27 $4.92 Change from Q1 ‘19 entertainment and consumer product tenants in Century City, +$0.07 +$0.06 +$0.10 Culver City and Beverly Hills will help maintain demand levels ($) through the rest of 2019 and into 2020. -
11-Unit Apartment Community Located in Beverlywood
2009 PREUSS ROAD 11-UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY LOCATED IN BEVERLYWOOD 1 CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER All materials and information received or derived from KW Commercial its directors, officers, agents, advisors, affiliates and/or any third party sources are provided without representation or warranty as to com- pleteness , veracity, or accuracy, condition of the property, compliance or lack of compliance with applicable governmental requirements, developability or suitability, financial performance of the property, projected financial performance of the property for any party’s intended use or any and all other matters. Neither KW Commercial its directors, officers, agents, advisors, or affiliates makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to accuracy or completeness of the any materials or information provided, derived, or received. Materials and information from any source, whether written or verbal, that may be furnished for review are not a substitute for a party’s active conduct of its own due diligence to determine these and other matters of significance to such party. KW Commercial will not investigate or verify any such matters or conduct due diligence for a party unless otherwise agreed in writing. EACH PARTY SHALL CONDUCT ITS OWN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION AND DUE DILIGENCE Any party contemplating or under contract or in escrow for a transaction is urged to verify all information and to conduct their own inspections and investigations including through appropriate third party independent professionals selected by such party. All financial data should be verified by the party including by obtaining and reading applicable documents and reports and consulting appropriate indepen- dent professionals. KW Commercial makes no warranties and/or representations regarding the veracity, completeness, or relevance of any financial data or assumptions. -
Examining the Completeness of Six Los Angeles Cities
EXAMINING THE COMPLETENESS OF SIX LOS ANGELES CITIES A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning by Judy Chang May 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support of many people. However, for his guidance and tolerance, special thanks go to Dr. Robert Beauregard. And for their relentless encouragement and comaraderie, my deepest gratitude goes to Caroline Bauer, Caitlin Hackett, Doneliza Joaquin, Caroline Massa, Charles-Antoine Perrault, Frederick Sham, Michael Snidal, and Kerensa Wood. 3 4 5 ABSTRACT While Los Angeles provides an array of goods, services, and amenities across its expansive borders in a quintessentially polycentric manner, there continues to appear to be a lack of some of these “urban functions” in some of the densest parts of the city. This thesis serves to identify this mismatch, comparing a set of six southeast Los Angeles municipalities— whose population densities rival and sometimes exceed some of the nation’s largest cities’— and a portion of Central Los Angeles of roughly the same area and density. While this study reveals that only in some cases do the southeast Los Angeles cities lack urban functions relative to the central city, they generally fall under “high-order” categories such as health care facilities and cultural centers. The study concludes with recommendations for increasing these high- order functions, which would at once grant cities a sense of identity and relieve cost- and time-burdens on residents who must continue traveling to a city center for high-order urban functions. -
Sunday 10:00AM Gratitude Meeting , Westside Hope Center, 11313 W Washington Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90066
Sunday 7:00PM Lil' Meeting in the Hood, Reed Park, Meets in- 8:30PM Five and Dime, Joslyn Park Auditorium, Meets in- 10:00AM Gratitude Meeting, Westside Hope Center, person and on Zoom ID: 8450904561 (no person, 633 Kensington Road, Santa Monica, CA, Meets in-person and on Zoom Id: 7948175359, passcode), 1133 7th Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90405 (O,SP,WC) 11313 West Washington Boulevard, Los Angeles, 90401 (O,D,SP,WC,NS,HY) Saturday CA, 90066 (O,D,WC,NS,HY) 7:30PM Malibu's Most Wanted, Our Lady Malibu, Meets 9:00AM Keep Coming Back (Steps 1 2 3), Meets 12:30PM Just for Today, Meets virtually on Zoom Id: in-person, 3625 Winter Canyon Road, Malibu, virtually on Zoom Id: 3562098677 Passcode: 274198755 (O,VM) 90265 (O,CL,D,SP,WC) saturday, Culver City, CA, 90230 1:00PM Serenity Above the Sea, Serra Retreat, Meets Wednesday (O,D,SP,St,WC,NS,VM) Password: saturday in-person, 3401 Serra Road, Malibu, California, 12:30PM Back From the Dead, Meets virtually on Zoom 9:00AM Serenity in the Sand, Santa Monica Beach, 90265 (O,D) Id: 274198755, Los Angeles, CA, 90066 South of Ocean Park Blvd., look for the WHITE 7:00PM Burning Desire, Westside Hope Center, Meets in- (O,D,WC,VM) FLAG, Between Lifeguard Towers 26 & 27, Santa person and on Zoom ID: 95228147621, 11313 6:00PM In Times of Illness, Meets virtually on Zoom Id: Monica, CA, 90405 (JT,ME,OUT) West Washington Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 89075266477, Culver City, CA, 90230 (O,IL,VM) 12:30PM Just for Today, Meets on Zoom ID: 274198755, 90066 (O,CL,D,SP,NS,HY) 8:00PM Grow or Go, Meets virtually on -
S Los Angeles As Your Personal Movie
California’s Los Angeles as Your Personal Movie By Lee Foster Planning my trip to Los Angeles put me in the director’s chair, requiring decisions mu ch like those that face any filmmaker. I wanted action, adventure, and most important, a happy ending that would leave me looking forward to making a sequel during a future visit. I discovered a vast “talent pool” of tempting attractions and mu seums here, ranging from blockbuster theme parks to one-of-a-kind art exhibits, all eager to play a role in my travel production. With only a few days “on location”, I had to make careful casting choices and script a schedule that would meet my time constraints and keep me entertained. A handful of “superstar” attractions performed well, but I was just as pleased with my selection of a “supporting cast” of lesser known, but no less talented, co-stars. I even added a few “cameo appearances” from interesting eateries that featured comic book superheroes and a sushi bar where the chefs dance to disco mu sic. My plot begins with the “superstars”: *The J. Paul Getty Museum/ Getty Center . The Getty Museum has had a profound effect on Los Angeles tourism, elevating the destination to a new level of art pilgrimage and strengthening also the many other art tourism aspects of Los Angeles that are worthy of attention. The billion-dollar Getty Center can be celebrated for several reasons. Its special art objects, such as medieval illuminated manuscripts, are generally the best in their genre. The architectural design by Richard Meier is stunning, presenting a sweeping view of the West Los Angeles valleys from a hilltop perch in Brentwood . -
Capturing the Cultural Layers of Koreatown, Los Angeles
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE CONTESTED SPACES: CAPTURING THE CULTURAL LAYERS OF KOREATOWN, LOS ANGELES A graduate project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Mass Communication By Charles Kaijo December 2014 The graduate project of Charles Kaijo is approved: _____________________________________ _________________ Eunai Shrake Date _____________________________________ _________________ Taehyun Kim Date _____________________________________ _________________ David Blumenkrantz, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Table of Contents Signature Page…………………………………………………………………….……....ii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………...iv Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………….…….…..1 Chapter 2: Literature Review…………………………….………………...…….…….….2 Koreatown as a historic ethnic enclave…………….…….……...........……….…..2 The Immigration Act of 1965….……………….……………………...………….4 Koreatown as a multicultural community…………………….………...…………7 The riots……………………………………………………….………………......9 Koreatown as a transnational and regional center……………….……................11 Chapter 3: Photographic Representation…………………………….………….……….17 Chapter 4: Methods…………………………………………………….…………….…..33 Chapter 5: Photo Gallery...………………………………………………………………37 Ethnic enclave…………………………………………………………..……......37 Multicultural space………………………………………….………………...….40 Transnational and regional space………………………………………..……….42 Chapter 6: Final Remark……………………………………….…………...……………47 References……………………………………………………………….…………….…48 iii ABSTRACT