DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1201.1448V1 [Gr-Qc]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1201.1448V1 [Gr-Qc] The correspondence between a scalar field and an effective perfect fluid Valerio Faraoni∗ Physics Department and STAR Research Cluster, Bishop’s University, 2600 College Street, Sherbrooke, Qu´ebec, Canada J1M 1Z7 It is widely acknowledged that, for formal purposes, a minimally coupled scalar field is equiva- lent to an effective perfect fluid with equation of state determined by the scalar potential. This correspondence is not complete because the Lagrangian densities L1 = P and L2 = −ρ, which are equivalent for a perfect fluid, are not equivalent for a minimally coupled scalar field. The exchange L1 ←→ L2 amounts to exchanging a “canonical” scalar field with a phantom scalar field. PACS numbers: 04.40.-b, 04.20.Fy, 04.20.-q INTRODUCTION using the other side ([4, 5], see also [6]). The non-equivalence between these two Lagrangian densities for a perfect fluid coupling explicitly to the Ricci Scalar fields have been present in the literature on curvature of spacetime (which has been suggested as a gravity and cosmology for many decades and are par- possible alternative to dark matter in galaxies [7]) has ticularly important in the contexts of inflation in the been recently discussed in [8], and the equivalence be- early universe and of quintessence in the late universe. tween a k-essence scalar field and a barotropic perfect It is widely recognized that a minimally coupled scalar fluid was discussed in [5]. field in General Relativity can be represented as a perfect We adopt the notations of Ref. [9]; in particular, the fluid (see, e.g., Ref. [1] for a detailed discussion). From signature of the spacetime metric is + ++. the conceptual point of view, it is clear that a scalar field − and a perfect fluid are very different physical systems; a MIMICKING A PERFECT FLUID WITH A fluid is obtained by averaging microscopic quantities as- MINIMALLY COUPLED SCALAR FIELD sociated with its constituent particles, and the fluid laws can be obtained via a kinetic theory using microscopic models of the fluid particles and of their interactions. A Let us mimick a perfect fluid using a minimally cou- scalar field, instead, is more fundamental and does not pled scalar field φ in a curved spacetime self-interacting derive from an average; it is not made of point-like par- through a potential V (φ). We assume standard General ticles and does not need an average to be defined—it is Relativity and the issue is to determine whether both Lagrangian densities = P and = ρ correctly de- already a continuum. As a consequence, the scalar field L1 L2 − stress-energy tensor (given by eq. (2) below) involves first scribe the scalar field effective fluid. It is well known order derivatives of the scalar field, while the perfect fluid that these Lagrangian densities are equivalent for a per- stress-energy tensor Tab = (P + ρ) uaub + Pgab does not fect fluid [2]. involve derivatives explicitly but can be described using A minimally coupled scalar field φ obeys the Klein- only the energy density ρ, pressure P , and four-velocity Gordon equation field ua. Hence, the fluid description of a scalar field is dV φ = 0 (1) arXiv:1201.1448v1 [gr-qc] 6 Jan 2012 not an identification, but only a convenient correspon- − dφ dence for formal purposes. However, while regarding the which is obtained (when cφ does not vanish identically) scalar field/perfect fluid duality as a formal one, one still from the covariant conservation∇ equation bT = 0 for needs to be careful because this correspondence is not ab the scalar field energy-momentum tensor ∇ perfect even for purely formal purposes. In this short note we discuss a property of perfect fluids which is not 1 c Tab[φ]= aφ bφ gab φ cφ Vgab . (2) satisfied by the effective fluid associated with a scalar ∇ ∇ − 2 ∇ ∇ − field, namely the possibility of describing a perfect fluid The tensor Tab[φ] assumes the form of an effective perfect with the two equivalent Lagrangian densities 1 = P fluid stress-energy tensor T = (P + ρ) u u + Pg if L ab a b ab and 2 = ρ. These two Lagrangian densities, which cφ is a timelike vector field [1]. The fluid four-velocity L − are equivalent for a perfect fluid [2, 3], are not equiva- is∇ lent for a scalar field “fluid”, as shown in the following aφ ua = ∇ (3) section. This property leads to a caveat against regard- c φ cφ ing the fluid/scalar field duality as a perfect one, which |∇ ∇ | c a c is relevant in the light of the recent interest in this cor- assuming φ cφ = 0,p with uau = sign ( φ cφ). respondence motivated by the possibility of computing The energy∇ density∇ 6 and pressure relative to∇ a comov-∇ inflationary perturbations on one side of the duality by ing observer with four-velocity ua are given by ρ = 2 a b ab Tab[φ]u u and P = Tab[φ]h /3, respectively, where yields hab gab + uaub is the Riemannian 3-metric in the 3- ≡ c 4 c dV space orthogonal to u (this 3 + 1 decomposition makes d x √ g ( δφ) cφ + δφ =0 . (14) − − ∇ ∇ dφ sense when cφ is timelike). One easily obtains ∇ Z c c Using the identity ( δφ) cφ = (δφ cφ) δφφ and 1 c c ∇ ∇ ∇ ∇ − ρ = φ cφ V sign ( φ cφ) , (4) discarding the boundary term, one obtains 2 ∇ ∇ − ∇ ∇ dV φ + =0 . (15) 1 1 c c P = 1+ sign ( φ cφ) φ cφ dφ 3 − 2 ∇ ∇ ∇ ∇ Eq. (15) is not the Klein-Gordon equation because of c [4 + sign ( φ cφ)] V (φ) . (5) the incorrect sign of the potential derivative term. The − ∇ ∇ } difference between eq. (15) and the Klein-Gordon equa- If we restrict ourselves to the case in which cφ is time- tion (1) disappears, of course, if V = constant. In this c ∇ like, φ cφ< 0, we have case the potential term gabV (φ) in the stress-energy ∇ ∇ − tensor Tab[φ] can be attributed entirely to a cosmological 1 c constant, i.e., to gravity instead of matter. If this con- ρ = φ cφ + V (φ) , (6) −2∇ ∇ stant vanishes, V 0, then eqs. (6) and (7) yield ρ = P and eq. (15) coincides≡ with the Klein-Gordon equation. 1 c P = φ cφ V (φ) , (7) However, there is still something wrong: the scalar field −2 ∇ ∇ − sourcing gravity and appearing in the total action and 4 R Stotal = Sgravity +Smatter = d x √ g +S[φ] (16) − 2κ (P + ρ) uaub + Pgab (8) Z (where κ 8πG) will give the incorrect field equations ≡ 1 c = aφ bφ gab φ cφ Vgab (9) 1 ∇ ∇ − 2 ∇ ∇ − Rab gabR = κTab[φ] (17) − 2 − Tab[φ] (10) instead of the Einstein equations ≡ c 1 in addition to ucu = 1. The last equation shows Rab gabR = κTab[φ] . (18) not only that a minimally− coupled scalar field can be − 2 given a perfect fluid description, but also that any per- When V 0, the correct Lagrangian density would be ≡ fect fluid with barotropic equation of state P = P (ρ) can = P = ρ instead of 2 = ρ. (Then 3 2 = ρ be mimicked by a scalar field with appropriate poten- canL only describe a perfectL fluid− with stiffL ≡ equation −L of tial V (φ). Roughly speaking, prescribing the equation of state P = ρ.) state P = P (ρ) corresponds to assigning a suitable po- The conclusion is that, for a perfect fluid, 1 = P is tential, but the correspondence between equation of state the Lagrangian density reproducing the correctL equations and scalar field potential is not one-to-one [10]. of motion, while 2 = ρ (or 3 = ρ) provides incorrect The Klein-Gordon Lagrangian density for the scalar equations of motion.L − L field is the well known [9] For completeness, we conclude this section by going back to eqs. (4) and (5) and considering the case of a 1 c spacelike cφ, although this choice obviously does not KG = φ cφ V (φ) , (11) ∇ c L −2 ∇ ∇ − correspond to any physical fluid. If φ cφ > 0 it is √ c ∇ ∇ which coincides with = P and the variation of the ac- ua = aφ/ φ cφ and, using eqs. (3)-(7), L1 ∇ ∇ ∇ tion S = d4x√ g P with respect to φ reproduces c KG u uc = 1 , (19) the Klein-Gordon equation− (1), as is also well known [9]. Let us tryR to adopt instead the other candidate La- 1 c grangian density ρ = φ cφ V (φ) , (20) 2∇ ∇ − 1 c 2 = ρ = φ cφ V (φ) ; (12) 1 c 5 P = φ cφ V (φ) . (21) L − 2 ∇ ∇ − −6 ∇ ∇ − 3 then, the variational principle Taking again = P yields the incorrect field equation L1 dV δS δ d4x √ g = 0 (13) φ 5 =0 , (22) 2 ≡ − L2 − dφ Z 3 while taking = = ρ yields again one obtains the incorrect energy-momentum tensor L ±L2 ∓ dV φ + =0 . (23) ab a b 1 ab c ab S = ∂ φ ∂ φ + η ∂ φ∂cφ V η , (28) dφ (2) − 2 − Hence, the Lagrangians , all give incorrect field 1 2 which does not reproduce T ab[φ] and the Klein-Gordon equations for a scalar fieldL with±L spacelike gradient. c equation unless V 0. Finally, we consider a null φ. In this case, the pur- ≡ pose of considering a scalar field∇ representation of a per- To reiterate the argument, one can consider an- fect fluid would be the modelling of the only perfect fluid other situation in which the Noether symmetry ap- with null four-velocity that makes sense physically, i.e.,a proach is applicable: that of a spatially homo- geneous and isotropic Friedmann-Lemaˆıtre-Robertson- null dust with associated stress-energy tensor Tab = uaub c Walker universe with line element with ucu = 0, describing a distribution of coherent mass- less φ-waves [11, 12].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kerr-Newman-Ads Black Hole Surrounded by Perfect Fluid Matter
    Kerr-Newman-AdS Black Hole Surrounded by Perfect Fluid Matter in Rastall Gravity Zhaoyi Xu,1,2,3,4 Xian Hou,1,3,4 Xiaobo Gong,1,2,3,4 Jiancheng Wang 1,2,3,4 ABSTRACT The Rastall gravity is the modified Einstein general relativity, in which the µν ,ν energy-momentum conservation law is generalized to T ;µ = λR . In this work, we derive the Kerr-Newman-AdS (KN-AdS) black hole solutions surrounded by the perfect fluid matter in the Rastall gravity using the Newman-Janis method and Mathematica package. We then discuss the black hole properties surrounded by two kinds of specific perfect fluid matter, the dark energy (ω = 2/3) and the − perfect fluid dark matter (ω = 1/3). Firstly, the Rastall parameter κλ could be − constrained by the weak energy condition and strong energy condition. Secondly, by analyzing the number of roots in the horizon equation, we get the range of the perfect fluid matter intensity α, which depends on the black hole mass M and the Rastall parameter κλ. Thirdly, we study the influence of the perfect fluid dark matter and dark energy on the ergosphere. We find that the perfect fluid dark matter has significant effects on the ergosphere size, while the dark energy has smaller effects. Finally, we find that the perfect fluid matter does not change the singularity of the black hole. Furthermore, we investigate the rotation velocity in the equatorial plane for the KN-AdS black hole with dark energy and perfect fluid dark matter. We propose that the rotation curve diversity in Low Surface Brightness galaxies could be explained in the framework of the Rastall gravity when both the perfect fluid dark matter halo and the baryon disk are taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Relativistic Hydrodynamics
    Stellar Fluid Dynamics and Numerical Simulations: From the Sun to Neutron Stars M. Rieutord and B. Dubrulle (eds) EAS Publications Series, 21 (2006) 43–79 AN INTRODUCTION TO RELATIVISTIC HYDRODYNAMICS E. Gourgoulhon1 Abstract. This lecture provides some introduction to perfect fluid dy- namics within the framework of general relativity. The presentation is based on the Carter-Lichnerowicz approach. It has the advantage over the more traditional approach of leading very straightforwardly to important conservation laws, such as the relativistic generalizations of Bernoulli’s theorem or Kelvin’s circulation theorem. It also permits to get easily first integrals of motion which are particularly useful for com- puting equilibrium configurations of relativistic stars in rotation or in binary systems. The presentation is relatively self-contained and does not require any aprioriknowledge of general relativity. In particular, the three types of derivatives involved in relativistic hydrodynamics are introduced in detail: this concerns the Lie, exterior and covariant derivatives. 1 Introduction Relativistic fluid dynamics is an important topic of modern astrophysics in at least three contexts: (i) jets emerging at relativistic speed from the core of active galactic nuclei or from microquasars, and certainly from gamma-ray burst central engines, (ii) compact stars and flows around black holes, and (iii) cosmology. Notice that for items (ii) and (iii) general relativity is necessary, whereas special relativity is sufficient for (i). We provide here an introduction to relativistic perfect fluid dynamics in the framework of general relativity, so that it is applicable to all themes (i) to (iii). However, we shall make a limited usage of general relativistic concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfect Fluids Arxiv:1710.04708V3 [Hep-Th] 14 May 2018
    Perfect Fluids Jan de Boer1, Jelle Hartong1, Niels A. Obers2, Watse Sybesma3, Stefan Vandoren3 1 Institute for Theoretical Physics and Delta Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 The Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark 3 Institute for Theoretical Physics and Center for Extreme Matter and Emergent Phenomena, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands Abstract We present a systematic treatment of perfect fluids with translation and rotation sym- metry, which is also applicable in the absence of any type of boost symmetry. It involves introducing a fluid variable, the kinetic mass density, which is needed to define the most gen- eral energy-momentum tensor for perfect fluids. Our analysis leads to corrections to the Euler equations for perfect fluids that might be observable in hydrodynamic fluid experiments. We also derive new expressions for the speed of sound in perfect fluids that reduce to the known perfect fluid models when boost symmetry is present. Our framework can also be adapted to (non-relativistic) scale invariant fluids with critical exponent z. We show that perfect fluids cannot have Schr¨odingersymmetry unless z = 2. For generic values of z there can be fluids with Lifshitz symmetry, and as a concrete example, we work out in detail the thermodynamics and fluid description of an ideal gas of Lifshitz particles and compute the speed of sound for the classical and quantum Lifshitz gases. arXiv:1710.04708v3 [hep-th] 14 May 2018 Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Perfect fluids3 2.1 Thermodynamics and kinetic mass density .
    [Show full text]
  • Curvature and the Stress-Energy Tensor
    Orthonormal Tetrads, continued Here’s another example, that combines local frame calculations with more global analysis. Suppose you have a particle at rest at infinity, and you drop it radially into a Schwarzschild black hole. What is the radial velocity as seen by a local static observer at radius r? The particle being at rest at infinity means that its total energy is ut = −1. Radial motion has θ and φ components zero, so u2 = −1 means r t u ur + u ut = −1 g (ur)2 + gttu2 = −1 rr t (1) (ur)2/(1 − 2M/r) − 1/(1 − 2M/r) = −1 (ur)2 = 2M/r . r Therefore, u = dr/dτ = q2M/r. The radial velocity seen by a local static observer is vrˆ = urˆ/utˆ rˆ = −u /utˆ − rˆ r t = e ru /(e tˆut) (2) −1/2 r −1/2 = −(1 − 2M/r) u /[(1 − 2M/r) ut] = q2M/r . Therefore, the locally measured radial velocity is just the same as the Newtonian expression, when Schwarzschild coordinates are used. By comparison, the radial velocity as measured at infinity is dr vr = = ur/ut = ur/(gttu )=(1 − 2M/r)ur = (1 − 2M/r) 2M/r . (3) dt t q This drops to zero at the horizon. Note that there is one factor of (1 − 2M/r)1/2 from the redshift and one from the change in the radial coordinate. Geodesic Deviation and Spacetime Curvature Previously we talked about geodesics, the paths of freely falling particles. We also indicated early on that the only “force” that gravity can exert on a particle is a tidal force.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch.9. Constitutive Equations in Fluids
    CH.9. CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS IN FLUIDS Multimedia Course on Continuum Mechanics Overview Introduction Fluid Mechanics Lecture 1 What is a Fluid? Pressure and Pascal´s Law Lecture 3 Constitutive Equations in Fluids Lecture 2 Fluid Models Newtonian Fluids Constitutive Equations of Newtonian Fluids Lecture 4 Relationship between Thermodynamic and Mean Pressures Components of the Constitutive Equation Lecture 5 Stress, Dissipative and Recoverable Power Dissipative and Recoverable Powers Lecture 6 Thermodynamic Considerations Limitations in the Viscosity Values 2 9.1 Introduction Ch.9. Constitutive Equations in Fluids 3 What is a fluid? Fluids can be classified into: Ideal (inviscid) fluids: Also named perfect fluid. Only resists normal, compressive stresses (pressure). No resistance is encountered as the fluid moves. Real (viscous) fluids: Viscous in nature and can be subjected to low levels of shear stress. Certain amount of resistance is always offered by these fluids as they move. 5 9.2 Pressure and Pascal’s Law Ch.9. Constitutive Equations in Fluids 6 Pascal´s Law Pascal’s Law: In a confined fluid at rest, pressure acts equally in all directions at a given point. 7 Consequences of Pascal´s Law In fluid at rest: there are no shear stresses only normal forces due to pressure are present. The stress in a fluid at rest is isotropic and must be of the form: σ = − p01 σδij =−∈p0 ij ij,{} 1, 2, 3 Where p 0 is the hydrostatic pressure. 8 Pressure Concepts Hydrostatic pressure, p 0 : normal compressive stress exerted on a fluid in equilibrium. Mean pressure, p : minus the mean stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Ideal Fluids
    2 Dynamics of Ideal Fluids The basic goal of any fluid-dynamical study is to provide (1) a complete description of the motion of the fluid at any instant of time, and hence of the kinematics of the flow, and (2) a description of how the motion changes in time in response to applied forces, and hence of the dynamics of the flow. We begin our study of astrophysical fluid dynamics by analyzing the motion of a compressible ideal fluid (i.e., a nonviscous and nonconducting gas); this allows us to formulate very simply both the basic conservation laws for the mass, momentum, and energy of a fluid parcel (which govern its dynamics) and the essentially geometrical relationships that specify its kinematics. Because we are concerned here with the macroscopic proper- ties of the flow of a physically uncomplicated medium, it is both natural and advantageous to adopt a purely continuum point of view. In the next chapter, where we seek to understand the important role played by internal processes of the gas in transporting energy and momentum within the fluid, we must carry out a deeper analysis based on a kinetic-theory view; even then we shall see that the continuum approach yields useful results and insights. We pursue this line of inquiry even further in Chapters 6 and 7, where we extend the analysis to include the interaction between radiation and both the internal state, and the macroscopic dynamics, of the material. 2.1 Kinematics 15. Veloci~y and Acceleration 1n developing descriptions of fluid motion it is fruitful to work in two different frames of reference, each of which has distinct advantages in certain situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Fluid Dynamics
    Relativistic Fluid Dynamcis 44 Relativistic Fluid Dynamics Jason Olsthoorn University of Waterloo [email protected] Abstract: Understanding the evolution of a many bodied system is still a very important problem in modern physics. Fluid mechanics provides a mechanism to determine the macroscopic motion of the system. These equations are additionally complicated when we consider a fluid moving in a curved spacetime. The following paper discusses the derivation of the relativistic equations of motion, uses numerical methods to provide solutions to these equations and describes how the curvature of spacetime is modified by the fluid. 1 Introduction Traditionally, a fluid is defined as a substance that does not support a shear stress. This definition is somewhat lacking, but it does present the idea that fluids “flow” and distort. Any non-rigid multi-bodied state can, under a suitable continuum hypothesis, be thus described as a fluid and will follow certain equations of motion. Here, we define a relativistic fluid as classical fluid modified by the laws of special relativity and/or curved spacetime (general relativity). The following paper attempts to provide a basic introduction to these equations of motion of a relativistic fluid. Fluid dynamics is an approximation of the motion of a many body system. A true description of the evolution of a fluid would, in principle, need to account for the motion of each individual particle. However, this description is impractical and of no substantial worth when modelling sufficiently large systems. Therefore, provided that the desired level of accuracy is much lower than the continuum approximation, it is acceptable to consider a system as a fluid.
    [Show full text]
  • Note on Scalars, Perfect Fluids, Constrained Field Theories, and All That
    Physics Letters B 727 (2013) 27–30 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Note on scalars, perfect fluids, constrained field theories, and all that Alberto Diez-Tejedor Departamento de Física, División de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Campus León, Universidad de Guanajuato, León 37150, Mexico article info abstract Article history: The relation of a scalar field with a perfect fluid has generated some debate along the last few years. Received 6 May 2013 In this Letter we argue that shift-invariant scalar fields can describe accurately the potential flow of an Received in revised form 14 October 2013 isentropic perfect fluid, but, in general, the identification is possible only for a finite period of time. Accepted 14 October 2013 After that period in the evolution the dynamics of the scalar field and the perfect fluid branch off. Available online 18 October 2013 The Lagrangian density for the velocity-potential can be read directly from the expression relating the Editor: M. Trodden pressure with the Taub charge and the entropy per particle in the fluid, whereas the other quantities of interest can be obtained from the thermodynamic relations. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction For the particular case of a potential flow, i.e. a fluid with no vorticity, Ωμν =∇μVν −∇ν Vμ = 0, we can always write Vμ = Recently many papers have addressed the question: can we ∂μΦ,withΦ a velocity-potential and Vμ = vuμ the Taub cur- identify a scalar field with the potential flow of a perfect fluid? For rent [4].Herev = h/s is a measure for the enthalpy per unit of a representative sample of these works please see Refs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmological Exact Solutions Set of a Perfect Fluid in an Anisotropic Space-Time in Petrov Type D
    Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics Vol. 10, 2016, no. 6, 267 - 295 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/astp.2016.6311 Cosmological Exact Solutions Set of a Perfect Fluid in an Anisotropic Space-Time in Petrov Type D R. Alvarado CINESPA, Escuela de Fisica Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica Copyright c 2016 Rodrigo Alvarado. This article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduc- tion in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract In this document a set of exact solutions is obtained by using the model of a perfect fluid on an homogeneous and anisotropic space-time that belongs to (Local Rotational Symmetry) Petrov's type D. This solutions represent the possible scenarios of a Universe for which the pressure P and the energetic density µ of a fluid are proportional (P = λµ), where λ can have any value. Hence, the aforementioned solution has importance for the fluid models with standard matter (λ 2 [0; 1=3]), and also for other models, like quintessence, dark energy, phantom, ekpyrotic etc. It is established that for any state of the fluid, there are two possible solutions that depend on the matter expanding faster on a perpendicular coordinate on a plane, rather tan the plane itself, or if the situation is the opposite. Possible singularities are studied, and cases where the solutions are not singular in t = 0 are established; moreover, to the possibility for the solutions, depending of the t values, to become isotropic, pointing out that going from a model that was anisotropic at the beginning to an isotropic one with the augmentation of t, depends on whether the pressure P of the fluid is lower or not than the density of the energy µ.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Spherical Symmetry of Perfect-Fluid Stellar Models in General Relativity
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2012 On the Spherical Symmetry of Perfect-Fluid Stellar Models in General Relativity Joshua M Brewer [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Cosmology, Relativity, and Gravity Commons, and the Geometry and Topology Commons Recommended Citation Brewer, Joshua M, "On the Spherical Symmetry of Perfect-Fluid Stellar Models in General Relativity. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2012. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1363 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Joshua M Brewer entitled "On the Spherical Symmetry of Perfect-Fluid Stellar Models in General Relativity." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Mathematics. Alex Freire, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Morwen Thistlethwaite, Henry Simpson Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) On the Spherical Symmetry of Perfect-Fluid Stellar Models in General Relativity A Thesis Presented for The Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Joshua M Brewer December 2012 c by Joshua M Brewer, 2012 All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIVISTIC FLUID EQUATIONS 1. Introduction This Note Is A
    RELATIVISTIC FLUID EQUATIONS BENOIT PAUSADER 1. Introduction This note is a compilation from [1, 2, 3, 4, 6]. We also point out [9] as nice references. 1+3 2 1.1. Notations. We consider Minkowski space (R ; gαβ) with g00 = −c , gij = δij and g0j = gj0 = 0. µν 00 −2 ij 0j j0 Its inverse is denoted g where g = −c , g = δij and g = 0 = g . We use the Einstein convention that repeated up-down indices be summed and we raise and lower indices using the metric as follows: α αβ β A = g Aβ;Bα = gαβB : In addition, latin indices i; j : : : vary from 1 to 3, while greek indices µ, ν : : : vary from 0 to 3. ν µ − 1 Note in particular that the coordinate along u is given by cν = ju uµj 2 uν and that the projection along u is given by1 µ 1 µ (proju) ν = α u uν : u uα We denote T d(M) the set of contravariant d-tensors on the Minkowski space. 1.1.1. Poincar´egroup. The Poincar´egroup is the group of isometries of (the affine space) M. Besides translations, we have the Lorentz transformations O(3; 1), i.e. the set of linear transformations L such that g(LX; LX) = g(X; X); αγ γ or in other words, LαβL = δβ . The first postulate is that all the laws of special relativity should be invariant (in fact co-variant) under Poincar´etransformations2. 1.2. Vocabulary. The vectors of M are naturally separated into ν µ ν • time-like vectors v such that gµν v v < 0 (just as for @t).
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics of Perfect Fluids from Scalar Field Theory
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 94, 025034 (2016) Thermodynamics of perfect fluids from scalar field theory † ‡ Guillermo Ballesteros,1,2,* Denis Comelli,3, and Luigi Pilo4,5, 1Institut de Physique Théorique, Université Paris Saclay, CEA, CNRS91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 2CERN, Theory Division, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland 3INFN, Sezione di Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy 4Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Università di L’Aquila, I-67010 L’Aquila, Italy 5INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, I-67010 Assergi, Italy (Received 1 June 2016; published 27 July 2016) The low-energy dynamics of relativistic continuous media is given by a shift-symmetric effective theory of four scalar fields. These scalars describe the embedding in spacetime of the medium and play the role of Stückelberg fields for spontaneously broken spatial and time translations. Perfect fluids are selected imposing a stronger symmetry group or reducing the field content to a single scalar. We explore the relation between the field theory description of perfect fluids to thermodynamics. By drawing the correspondence between the allowed operators at leading order in derivatives and the thermodynamic variables, we find that a complete thermodynamic picture requires the four Stückelberg fields. We show that thermodynamic stability plus the null-energy condition imply dynamical stability. We also argue that a consistent thermodynamic interpretation is not possible if any of the shift symmetries is explicitly broken. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.025034 I. INTRODUCTION effective field theory (EFT) of continuous media [4,5], which turns to have an ample range of applications. In order Fluid dynamics and thermodynamics are probably the to describe continuous media beyond anisotropic elastic oldest and better known examples of effective descriptions solids, the field content of the pull-back formalism must be of a complicated underlying system in terms of a small extended with a fourth scalar [5].
    [Show full text]