DOCSLIB.ORG

National Action Programme to Combat Desertification in Armenia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN ARMENIA MINISTRY OF NATURE PROTECTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2002 NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN ARMENIA NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN ARMENIA Project Director and Coordinator ASHOT VADEVANYAN Executive Editor SAMVEL BALOYAN Consultant NUNE DARBINYAN The Ministry of nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia expresses grateful acknowledgement to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Secretariat of Convention to Combat Desertification (UN CCD) for financial support in preparation of the National Action Programme to Combat Desertification, as well as to the United Nations Development Programme Resident Mission in Armenia for its administrative support and constancy services. Preparation of the National Action Programme to Combat desertification in the republic of Armenia has been carried out by the Interagency Committee of the Ministry of Nature Protection for compliance to Armenia’s obligations of the Republic of Armenia under the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. 2 NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN ARMENIA Foreword Combating desertification is one of the global environmental issues of the Earth. Given the geological-climatic conditions Armenia is also subject to desertification and is greatly damaged, mainly due to land degradation, reduction of biodiversity and biological resources and, as a result, deterioration of social state of population. So combating desertification is a strategical issue for republic. Mitigation and prevention of desertification is a precondition for sustainable development of the country. With UNCCD Armenia undertakes a number of international obligations where the priority is given to developing the National Plan to Combat Desertification. UN CCD being an essential achievement of Rio summit is closely related to UN Conventions on Biological Diversity and Climate Change. Armenia is a member of these Conventions as well. UN CCD is an innovation document, a new achievement in the international law on environmental protection. I consider developing the National Plan to Combat Desertification in Armenia as a modern task both for ecological and economical development of the country. The witness for its strategical importance is approving the project by RA Government (28.03.2002.), which will encourage effective implementation of environmental measurements in the different fields. Special significance is given to analysis of ecological and socio economical status of the republic, identification of executive and local authorities, land users role in combating desertification. Essential scientific significance have the computer-based mappings, where a detailed description of environmental, including state of natural resources and features of desertification processes is represented. I hope implementing the National Plan to Combat Desertification will facilitate mitigation of nature vulnerability by means of conservation, rehabilitation and sustainable use of natural resources and lead to poverty reduction by improving the socio-economic state of the country. Minister of Nature Protection Vardan Ayvazyan 3 NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN ARMENIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………….. PART I Chapter 1. Natural and Climatic Conditions in Armenia 1.1. Geographic Description Relief, Vertical Zoning ………… 1.2. Climate…………………….. 1.3. Geological Structure …………………….. 1.4. Lands 1.5. Hydrology………………………………… 1.6. Flora…………………. 1.7. Fauna…………………………… Chapter 2. Socio-economic Conditions and Natural Resources in Armenia 2.1. Legislation in the Republic of Armenia……………….. 2.2. The Population and Settling Characteristics……………………………. 2.3 Territorial Division, Settlements The Population and Settling Characteristics…………….. 2.4. General Trends of Economic Development…………………….. 2.5. Social Security Issues…………………. 2.6. Industry……………….. 2.7. Agriculture……….. 2.8. Energy Sector………… 2.9. Land Resources……………… 2.10. Water Resources. 2.11. Biological Resources .. 2.12. Mineral Resources…. 2.13. Specially Protected Areas….. 2.14. Recreation… 2.15. Environmental Economics Mechanisms…………………………….. Chapter 3. Desertification in the Republic of Armenia 3.1. Desertification Criteria and Factors…………… 3.1.1. Desertification Criteria………………….. 3.1.2. Desertification Factors… 3.2. Peculiarities of Landscape Desertification………….. Chapter 4. Socio-economic Consequences of Desertification 4.1. Correlation of Desertification and Economy… 4.2. Economic-and-environmental Predictions for Desertification…………………. PART II Chapter 1. Strategy Trends of Actions to Combat Desertification in Armenia 1.1. Enhancement of Legislation and Management System… 1.1.1.Enhancement of Legislation…….. 1.1.2. Improvement of Management System………… 1.2. Economic Development…………….. 1.2.1. Agriculture….. 1.2.2. Urban Development…………… 1.2.3. Industry…………… 1.2.4. Energy……………….. 1.2.5. Transport………….. 4 NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN ARMENIA 1.3. Improvement of Economic Mechanisms for Natural Resources Management 1.3.1. Use of Water Resources……………. 1.3.2. Use of Entrails…………. 1.3.3. Land Use……… 1.3.4. Use of Biological Resources………………………………….. 1.3.5. Recreational Industry 1.3.6. Reserves…………….. 1.4. Conventions Related Joint Actions………………….. 1.5. International Cooperation ……………………………………. Chapter 2. The Role of Education and Science in Combating Desertification 2.1. Environmental Education Issues……………… 2.2. Scientific Research………………. Chapter 3. Public Participation in Combating Desertification 3.1. Provision of Public Awareness……………………………… 3.2. Provision of Public Participation in Decision-making and Implementation of Actions……………… 3.3. Public Stakeholders……………………………… PART III Priority Projects of Local Importance 1. Recovery of Lands Subject to Desertification in the Garni Community in the Province of Kotayk of the Republic of Armenia…………………………………… 2. Goris River Non-structural Mudflow Mitigation in the Province of Syunik of the Republic of Armenia……………………… 3. Project for Engineering and Geological Survey of the Site of Makaravank Memorial Complex in the Tavush Province of the Republic of Armenia…………………….. 4. Mitigation and Neutralization of Harmful Impact of the Shamlugh tail Storages in the Syunik and Lori Provinces of the Republic of Armenia………………………….. PART IV MAPPING OF AREAS SUBJECT TO DESERTIFICATION 1. Methods of computer-based mapping of areas subject to desertification 2. Land cover……………………………………………………………………… 3. Seismic situation in Armenia ………………………………………………………….. 4. Natural fodder holdings …………………………………………………………… 5. Forests……………………………… 6. Landslide dangerous areas……………….. 7. Mudflow riskiness in river basins………………… 8. Lake Sevan problem………………………. 9 Desertification on the territory of RA………………….. 10. ……………….. Authors.................………..................…………………......................................... 5 NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION IN ARMENIA INTRODUCTION Desertification as a global environmental problem includes the integrity of undesirable and disastrous processes and their consequences. This is the reason why combating desertification includes efficient administration of conservation and rational use of natural ecosystems, their components and natural resources, but also such efforts targeted at mitigation of impacts on violation of ecological balance of the environment, such as social and economic factors. Therefore, efficiency of combating desertification mainly depends upon profound analysis of socio-economic conditions and identification of natural resources potential. Desertification processes on the territory of the Republic of Armenia, which have been more activated under the conditions of recent years socio-economic crisis and blockade, cover about 80% of the country’s territory. By realizing the importance of the issue Armenia took an active participation in the activities of the Inter-governmental Advisory Committee for preparation of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, and signed it in Paris on October 14, 1994. The National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia ratified the Convention in July 1997. Formulation of the National Action Programme to Combat Desertification in Armenia is a critical integrated part of the obligations under the UN Convention to Combat Desertification. Hence, the Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia initiated in 1999 preparation of a national action plan to combat desertification in Armenia sponsored by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Secretariat of Convention (UN CCD), and Armenia office of UNDP . Proposed project is a guiding document. First part analyses multilateral causes of desertification, second – priorities of strategy actions to combat desertification. Third part represents a number of projects of local significance and the forth – maps of decertified areas of Armenia. Second part of this project is approved by RA Government ( 28.03.2002) on the chapters - “ Strategy of actions to combat desertification”, “Education and science to combat desertification’ and “Public participation to combat desertification’ The National Action Plan would enable country to address resources to environmental policy as a state security task to mitigate and prevent socio-economic consequences of desertification. The project assumed the framework for tasks and activities of ministries, state territorial
Recommended publications
  • Armenia: a Human Rights Perspective for Peace and Democracy

    Armenia: a Human Rights Perspective for Peace and Democracy

    6OJWFSTJU´U1PUTEBN "OKB.JIS]"SUVS.LSUJDIZBO]$MBVEJB.BIMFS]3FFUUB5PJWBOFO &ET "SNFOJB")VNBO3JHIUT1FSTQFDUJWF GPS1FBDFBOE%FNPDSBDZ )VNBO3JHIUT )VNBO3JHIUT&EVDBUJPOBOE.JOPSJUJFT Armenia: A Human Rights Perspective for Peace and Democracy Human Rights, Human Rights Education and Minorities Edited by Anja Mihr Artur Mkrtichyan Claudia Mahler Reetta Toivanen Universitätsverlag Potsdam 2005 Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. © Universität Potsdam, 2005 Herausgeber: MenschenRechtsZentrum der Universität Potsdam Vertrieb: Universitätsverlag Potsdam Postfach 60 15 53, 14415 Potsdam Fon +49 (0) 331 977 4517 / Fax 4625 e-mail: [email protected] http://info.ub.uni-potsdam.de/verlag.htm Druck: Audiovisuelles Zentrum der Universität Potsdam und sd:k Satz Druck GmbH Teltow ISBN 3-937786-66-X Dieses Manuskript ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Es darf ohne vorherige Genehmigung der Herausgeber nicht vervielfältigt werden. This book is published with the financial support of the Volkswagen Stiftung -Tandem Project Berlin/ Potsdam, Germany. The publication can be downloaded as PDF-file under: www.humanrightsresearch.de An Armenian version of the publication which includes papers of the con- ference and carries the title “Armenia from the perspective of Human Rights” was published by the Yerevan State University in Armenia in Au- gust 2005 and made possible through
  • Local Level Risk Management M a N U

    Local Level Risk Management M a N U

    LOCAL LEVEL RISK MANAGEMENT M A N U A L Y E R E V A N 2012 1 LLRM EXECUTIVE LOCAL LEVEL RISK IMPLEMENTATION BACKGROUND 2 3 SUMMARY MANAGEMENT (LLRM) / FORMAT EXPERIENCE IN ARMENIA VULNERABILITY AND GENERAL APPROACHES AND CAPACITY 1.1 INFORMATION 2.1 3.1 PRINCIPLES APPLIED ASSESSMENT (VCA) HAZARDS RESOURCES AND THREATENING 3.2 PRACTICAL CASES TOOLS ARMENIA PROCESS A PREPARATORY PHASE DATA COLLECTION B AND RESEARCH C ANALYSIS D TOOL KIT PLANNING DRR MAINSTREAMING INTO DEVELOPMENT PLANS / DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING TOOLS IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION DRR AND CLIMATE LLRM RISK MANAGEMENT DRR AND GENDER M A N U A L EQUITY 2 Authors: Ashot Sargsyan UNDP, DRR Adviser Armen Chilingaryan UNDP, DRR Project Coordinator Susanna Mnatsakanyan UNDP DRR Project VCA Expert Experts: Hamlet Matevosyan Rector of the Crisis Management State Academy of the Ministry of Emergency Situations Hasmik Saroyan Climate Risk Management Expert LLRM/VCA implementation Armen Arakelyan Specialist Head of “Lore” Rescue Team This manual is prepared and published with financial support from UNDP within the framework of the Project Strengthening of National Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction Capacities in Armenia. Empowered lives The views expressed in the publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Resilient nations United Nations or UNDP. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This manual is a result of consolidation of collective efforts of many professionals and experts from different organizations and agencies – members of the UN extended Disaster Management Team, which worked during the years hand-to-hand to support and facilitate the strengthening of Disaster Management national system in Armenia.
  • The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia

    The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia

    30312 Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia: Addressing Gaps in Service Delivery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure and Energy Services Department Europe and Central Asia Region 1st September 2004 FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 Disclaimer: This paper is published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with minimum delay. The typescript of this paper, therefore, has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. © 2004 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), The World Bank. ii FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 CONTENTS Abbreviations And Acronyms vi Acknowledgments vii Overview and Summary of Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 Why did we do this Study?........................................................................................................................................5
  • Akhuryan Basin Management Area KEY WATER ISSUES

    Akhuryan Basin Management Area KEY WATER ISSUES

    ARMENIA Akhuryan Basin Management Area KEY WATER ISSUES EEnvi ronmenPt al Pr otectioIn of IntRe rnati onal RivBe r Basin s The project is funded This project is implemented by a consortium by the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG The Environmental Protection of International River Basins (EPIRB) project aims to improve the quality of water in transboundary river basins in the wider Black Sea region and Belarus, including Armenia. One of the specific objectives is to improve technical capacities by developing river basin management plans (RBMPs) in selected pilot river basins, according to the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). One of the selected pilot basins is the Akhuryan basin management area, which includes the Akhuryan River basin, located in the western part of the Republic of Armenia, and the Metsamor River basin, which is adjacent to the Akhuryan River basin. 2 Good water status The Water Framework Directive is achieved when pollution is and river basin management plans controlled and there is One of the requirements of the WFD is the achievement and sufficient flow for ecosystems preservation of good water status by managing waters in natural to function and survive. units — that is, in river basins. River basin planning follows a structured approach: finding out facts, deciding on necessary actions, making a management plan, and putting the plan into practice. An important first step is to identify significant water management issues so that appropriate solutions and measures can be developed. The impacts of human activities Human activities can lead to serious problems in terms of both water quality and quantity.
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf

    Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf

    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
  • Environmental Assessment Report Armenia: North-South Road

    Environmental Assessment Report Armenia: North-South Road

    Environmental Assessment Report Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Document Stage: Draft Sub-project Number: 42145 August 2010 Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 Prepared by Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) of Armenia for Asian Development Bank The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Armenia: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranches 2 & 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Report ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank AARM ADB Armenian Resident Mission CO2 carbon dioxide EA executing agency EARF environmental assessment and review framework EIA environmental impact assessment EMP environmental management and monitoring plan IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MFF multi-tranche financing facility MNP Ministry of Nature Protection MOC Ministry of Culture MOH Ministry of Health MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communication NGO nongovernment organization NO2 nitrogen dioxide NO nitrogen oxide MPC maximum permissible concentration NPE Nature Protection Expertise NSS National Statistical Service PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PMU Project Management Unit PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RA Republic of Armenia RAMSAR Ramsar Convention on Wetlands REA Rapid Environmental Assessment (checklist) SEI State Environmental Inspectorate
  • 5 Environmental Examination

    5 Environmental Examination

    5 ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EXAMINATION FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT SEWAGE SYSTEMS IN RA 5-1 Environmental Examination for Cultural Properties (1/2) Nos. of Nos. of Community cultural Rating Community cultural Rating properties properties ARAGATSOTN MARZ Akunq 9 D Lusagyugh 10 D Aghdzq 9 D Tsaghkahovit 5 D Antarut 3 D Tsaghkashen 2 D Ashnak 16 D Tsilqar 6 D Avan+Khnusik 36 D Katnaghbyur 10 D Avtona 13 D Karmrashen 13 D Aragats (Aparan district) 12 D Kaqavadzor 9 D Arayi 6 D Hartavan 15 D Arteni 1 D Dzoraglukh 14 D Apnagyugh 10 D Dzoragyugh 3 D Baysz 4 D Meliqgyugh 3 D Byurakan 40 D Miraq 4 D Garnahovit 10 D Mulqi 2 D Geghadir 1 D Nigavan 9 D Gegharot 11 D Norashen (Aparan district) 8 D Norashen (Aragats Davtashen 5 D District) 2 D Dian 4 D Shenavan 4 D Yeghipartush 8 D Shgharshik 2 D Yeghnik 10 D Vosketas 2 D Yernjatap 14 D Chqnagh 6 D Zovasar 3 D Vardenis 14 D Ttujur 7 D Vardenut 5 D Irind 6 D Verin Sasunik 18 D Lernapar 4 D Tegher 2 D Lernarot 24 D Orgov 24 D SHIRAK MARZ Alvar 3 D Krasar 6 D Aghvorik 2 D Hovit 11 D Ardenis 3 D Dzorashen 1 D Arpeni 6 D Mets Sariar 3 D Bandivan 14 D Musaelyan 19 D Bashgyugh 8 D Shaghik 3 D Garnaritch + Yeghnajur 4 D Shirak 2 D Kamkhut 2 D Pemzashen 12 D Lernakert 12 D Jajur 4 D Lernut 4 D Jrarat 18 D Tsaghkut 5 D Sarnaghbyur 45 D Kamo 12 D Sarapat 2 D Karmrakar 10 D Sizavet 1 D Kaqavasar 3 D Tzoghamarg 8 D Krashen 2 D Poqr Sariar 2 D Source: The Study Team (2007) EE-1-1/2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EXAMINATION FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT SEWAGE SYSTEMS IN RA 5-1 Environmental Examination for Cultural Properties (2/2) Nos.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
  • Shirak Guidebook

    Shirak Guidebook

    Wuthering Heights of Shirak -the Land of Steppe and Sky YYerevanerevan 22013013 1 Facts About Shirak FOREWORD Mix up the vast open spaces of the Shirak steppe, the wuthering wind that sweeps through its heights, the snowcapped tops of Mt. Aragats and the dramatic gorges and sparkling lakes of Akhurian River. Sprinkle in the white sheep fl ocks and the cry of an eagle. Add churches, mysterious Urartian ruins, abundant wildlife and unique architecture. Th en top it all off with a turbulent history, Gyumri’s joi de vivre and Gurdjieff ’s mystical teaching, revealing a truly magnifi cent region fi lled with experi- ences to last you a lifetime. However, don’t be deceived that merely seeing all these highlights will give you a complete picture of what Shirak really is. Dig deeper and you’ll be surprised to fi nd that your fondest memories will most likely lie with the locals themselves. You’ll eas- ily be touched by these proud, witt y, and legendarily hospitable people, even if you cannot speak their language. Only when you meet its remarkable people will you understand this land and its powerful energy which emanates from their sculptures, paintings, music and poetry. Visiting the province takes creativity and imagination, as the tourist industry is at best ‘nascent’. A great deal of the current tourist fl ow consists of Diasporan Armenians seeking the opportunity to make personal contributions to their historic homeland, along with a few scatt ered independent travelers. Although there are some rural “rest- places” and picnic areas, they cater mainly to locals who want to unwind with hearty feasts and family chats, thus rarely providing any activities.
  • Ra Shirak Marz

    Ra Shirak Marz

    RA SHIRAK MARZ 251 RA SHIRAK MARZ Marz center – Gyumri town Territories - Artik, Akhuryan, Ani, Amasia and Ashotsk Towns - Gyumri, Artik, Maralik RA Shirak marz is situated in the north-west of the republic. In the West it borders with Turkey, in the North it borders with Georgia, in the East – RA Lori marz and in the South – RA Aragatsotn marz. Territory 2681 square km. Territory share of the marz in the territory of RA 9 % Urban communities 3 Rural communities 116 Towns 3 Villages 128 Population number as of January 1, 2006 281.4 ths. persons including urban 171.4 ths. persons rural 110.0 ths. persons Share of urban population size 60.9 % Share of marz population size in RA population size, 2005 39.1 % Agricultural land 165737 ha including - arable land 84530 ha Being at the height of 1500-2000 m above sea level (52 villages of the marz are at the height of 1500-1700 m above sea level and 55 villages - 2000 m), the marz is the coldest region 0 of Armenia, where the air temperature sometimes reaches -46 C in winter. The main railway and automobile highway connecting Armenia with Georgia pass through the marz territory. The railway and motor-road networks of Armenia and Turkey are connected here. On the Akhuryan river frontier with Turkey the Akhuryan reservoir was built that is the biggest in the country by its volume of 526 mln. m3. Marzes of the Republic of Armenia in figures, 1998-2002 252 The leading branches of industry of RA Shirak marz are production of food, including beverages and production of other non-metal mineral products.
  • Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment

    Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment

    Final Draft ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment By Arusyak Ghukasyan and Astghine Pasoyan Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF BOXES .......................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................6 1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................8 2 EVOLUTION AND CURRENT STATUS OF ARMENIA’S DISTRICT HEAT SUPPLY SECTOR.....................................................................................................................................................................8 3 HEAT SUPPLY POLICY REFORM AND RESTRUCTURING EFFORTS .............................11 3.1 ARMENIA’S URBAN HEATING STRATEGY ..............................................................................................11
  • Annex to the Protocol Decision of the Sitting of the Government of the Republic of Armenia No 32 of 9 August 2012 THIRD REPOR

    Annex to the Protocol Decision of the Sitting of the Government of the Republic of Armenia No 32 of 9 August 2012 THIRD REPOR

    Annex to the Protocol Decision of the Sitting of the Government of the Republic of Armenia No 32 of 9 August 2012 THIRD REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH POINT 1 OF ARTICLE 15 OF THE EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Yerevan 2012 Content Introduction Part 1 Analysis of the situation Part 2 Practical steps taken at national level summarising results of the 2nd stage of monitoring of implementation of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages Part 3 Measures taken and projects implemented after the second report submitted by the Republic of Armenia aimed at application of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages Part 4 Steps taken – according to articles Part 5 Implementation of the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the application of the Charter by Armenia Annexes Annex 1 Distribution of permanent population of the Republic of Armenia by cities and villages Annex 2 The list of mixed rural settlements or settlements populated predominantly by national minorities Annex 3 The list of settlements, where Yezidi or Kurdish language is taught at state general education schools Annex 4 The list of settlements, where Assyrian language is taught at state general education schools Annex 5 The list of state general education schools which have classes with Russian language instruction INTRODUCTION 1. According to point 1 of Article 15 of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages, the Republic of Armenia submits the third report on the course of measures aimed at application of the principles of the Charter and of provisions of the Charter, as well as on results of the second stage of observations of the Committee of Experts on application of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages in Armenia, on practical steps implemented at national level in the framework of the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.