DOCSLIB.ORG

Level 2 Intermediate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Billionaires ‘adding to poverty’ Level 2 Intermediate 1 Warmer a. Write the following numbers. one hundred and eighty-nine billion _________________________________________________ thirty-one trillion _________________________________________________ b. How many billionaires can you name? c. What is Oxfam? 2 Key words Write the key words from the article next to the definitions below. Then find the words in the article to read them in context. The paragraph numbers are given to help you. accumulation aid income extremes hindering inequality poverty tackle tax havens the wealthy 1. stopping someone or something from making progress or developing __________________ (para 1) 2. to make an organized attempt to deal with a problem, often a social problem __________________ (para 1) 3. the process by which something increases in amount over time __________________ (para 2) 4. money that someone gets from working or from investing money __________________ (para 2) 5. financial help __________________ (para 2) 6. a situation in which someone does not have enough money to pay for their basic needs __________________ (para 2) 7. people who are extremely rich __________________ (para 5) 8. as different from each other as they could possibly be __________________ (para 6) 9. a situation in which people are not equal because some have more opportunities, power, money, etc than others __________________ (para 6) 10. places where people go to live, or where they keep their money, so that they do not have to pay higher taxes in their home country __________________ (para 15) • © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013 NEWS LESSONS / Billionaires ‘adding to poverty’ / Intermediate FROM WEBSITE •PHOTOCOPIABLECAN BE DOWNLOADED Billionaires ‘adding to poverty’ Level 2 Intermediate Billionaires’ fortunes hinder fight 9 She said: “We can no longer pretend that against poverty, says Oxfam the creation of wealth for a few will benefit the many – too often the reverse is true.” Phillip Inman, economics correspondent 19 January, 2013 10 The report said the issue affected all parts of the world. “In the UK, inequality is 1 The huge fortunes made by the world’s rapidly returning to levels not seen since richest 100 billionaires are increasing the nineteenth century. In China, the top inequality and hindering the world’s ability to 10% now earn nearly 60% of the income. tackle poverty, according to Oxfam. Chinese inequality levels are now similar to 2 The charity said the accumulation of those in South Africa, which is now the most wealth and income often led to a reduction unequal country on Earth.” in secure jobs and decent wages for the poorest people. This made it more difficult 11 In the US, the share of national income for people who survive on aid or low going to the top 1% has doubled since 1980 wages to improve their situation and from 10 to 20%, the report says. escape poverty. 12 Members of the richest 1% are estimated 3 Oxfam said the world’s poorest could be to cause as much as 10,000 times more taken out of poverty several times over if the pollution than the average US citizen. richest 100 billionaires would give away the 13 Oxfam said world leaders should learn from money they made in 2012. countries such as Brazil, which has grown 4 Without naming anyone, the charity argued rapidly while reducing inequality. that the $240bn made in 2012 by the richest 14 Stocking said: “We need to reverse decades 100 billionaires would be enough to end of increasing inequality. As a first step, world extreme poverty four times over. leaders should formally agree to reduce 5 It is unusual for charities to attack the inequality to the levels seen in 1990.” wealthy, because they are usually seen 15 She said closing tax havens, which hold as as a source of money. Bill Gates and much as $31 trillion, or as much as a third Warren Buffett are among a group of 40 of all global wealth, could collect $189bn in US billionaires who have said they will give additional taxes. much of their wealth to aid projects, but there is little detail about the level of their © Guardian News and Media 2013 annual donations. Russian, Middle Eastern First published in The Guardian, 19/01/13 or Chinese billionaires have not promised to do the same. 6 In the report, The Cost of Inequality: How Wealth and Income Extremes Hurt Us All, published just before the World Economic Forum in Davos, the charity asks world leaders to commit to reducing inequality to at least 1990 levels. 7 The report found that the richest 1% had increased their incomes by 60% in the past 20 years. And the financial crisis has sped up, not slowed, the process. 8 Barbara Stocking, Oxfam’s Chief Executive, said studies show that countries suffer low levels of investment and growth as workers are forced to survive on a smaller share of total incomes. • © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013 NEWS LESSONS / Billionaires ‘adding to poverty’ / Intermediate FROM WEBSITE •PHOTOCOPIABLECAN BE DOWNLOADED Billionaires ‘adding to poverty’ Level 2 Intermediate 3 Comprehension check Answer these questions with information from the article. 1. How much did the world’s richest 100 billionaires increase their wealth by in 2012? 2. How much money would be needed to tackle world poverty? 3. Why does Oxfam criticize even those US billionaires who do donate part of their wealth? 4. Why do Oxfam especially criticize billionaires in China, Russia and the Middle East? 5. What is the name of Oxfam’s report? 6. Which country should world leaders learn from, according to Oxfam? 7. In which country is financial inequality most extreme? 8. In what way is it claimed that billionaires cause environmental damage? 9. What does Oxfam want world leaders to do first? 10. What one action could relieve much of the poverty in the world? 4 Word fields a. Find all the money-related words in the article and write them into the box. b. Write example sentences for those words that you know but don’t know how to use yet. 5 Discussion • How did you feel when you read this article? • Do you think that world poverty can be ended by the world’s richest people? 6 Writing Write either a letter or email about this article and its contents to one of the following: a. a newspaper b. a billionaire c. your local member of parliament. 7 Webquest Go to http://www.oxfam.org/ and find out more about Oxfam’s work. • © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013 NEWS LESSONS / Billionaires ‘adding to poverty’ / Intermediate FROM WEBSITE •PHOTOCOPIABLECAN BE DOWNLOADED Billionaires ‘adding to poverty’ Level 2 Intermediate KEY 1 Warmer 4 Word fields a. 189,000,000,000; 31,000,000,000,000 a. b. possible answers: Bill Gates; Richard Branson; billionaires, poverty, economics, fortunes, richest, Oprah Winfrey; Mark Zuckerberg; Donald Trump; wealth, income, wages, aid, poorest, money, the Giorgio Armani; George Lucas; J K Rowling; wealthy, donations, cost, financial crisis, investment, Steven Spielberg growth, tax c. a worldwide charity: ‘Oxfam is an international confederation of 17 organizations networked together in more than 90 countries, as part of a global movement for change, to build a future free from the injustice of poverty.’ http://www.oxfam.org/ 2 Key words 1. hindering 2. tackle 3. accumulation 4. income 5. aid 6. poverty 7. the wealthy 8. extremes 9. inequality 10. tax havens 3 Comprehension check 1. $240bn 2. a quarter of the above sum 3. because they don’t provide details of their annual donations 4. They have not promised their wealth to aid projects. 5. The Cost of Inequality: How Wealth and Income Extremes Hurt Us All 6. Brazil 7. South Africa 8. They pollute far more than the average person. 9. formally agree to reduce inequality to the levels seen in 1990 10. closing tax havens • © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013 NEWS LESSONS / Billionaires ‘adding to poverty’ / Intermediate FROM WEBSITE •PHOTOCOPIABLECAN BE DOWNLOADED.
Recommended publications
  • Classical and Political Humanitarianisms in an Era of Military Interventionism and the War on Terror Ambiguity, Prescription, Jus in Bello and Jus Ad Bellum

    Classical and Political Humanitarianisms in an Era of Military Interventionism and the War on Terror Ambiguity, Prescription, Jus in Bello and Jus Ad Bellum

    journal of international humanitarian legal studies 8 (2017) 33-112 brill.com/ihls Classical and Political Humanitarianisms in an Era of Military Interventionism and the War on Terror Ambiguity, Prescription, Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum Matthew Bywater London School of Economics and Political Science graduate [email protected] Abstract This paper scrutinises the modus operandi of classical and political humanitarianism: the use of ambiguity and prescription to frame calls for international action to protect civilians, and public commentary on jus in bello and jus ad bellum. It does so by in- novatively considering the perspectives of belligerents alongside those of humanitar- ian actors, so as to identify how belligerents have responded to the two humanitarian modus operandi, and to ascertain the connection of humanitarian actors to the wars and international military interventions that they have implicitly or explicitly called for or endorsed. The paper finds that the response of belligerents differs from what both classical and political humanitarians expect. Even where humanitarians maintain am- biguity, the intention to will military action remains present and even the documenta- tion and reporting of violence will bolster military intervention. Such consequences will be perceptible to belligerents, who may restrict humanitarian space. When hu- manitarians advance jus ad bellum perspectives, the humanitarian identity envisioned by classicists is not necessarily compromised. But belligerents are positively influenced by such perspectives only when those perspectives coincide with their own position. Keywords humanitarianism – humanitarian action – military intervention – war – témoignage – speaking out – advocacy – perceptions – belligerents The historical period since the end of the Cold War has been a particularly tumultuous one for the humanitarian community.
  • Press Release: 14 January 2016 This House Believes That the Media's

    Press Release: 14 January 2016 This House Believes That the Media's

    Oliver Yeates and Alice Mottram Press Officers, Lent 2016 The Cambridge Union Society 9A Bridge Street Cambridge, CB2 1UB Email: [email protected] Press Release: 14 January 2016 This House Believes that the Media’s Reporting is Detrimental to Humanitarian Crises Around the World First Proposition: Francesca Ebel Ms Ebel has reported on the Ukraine crisis as a freelance journalist since 2014. The media has mis-reported on the crisis, misleading the public and harming the people directly affected. Further, the media has failed to continue reporting on the crisis because Ukraine is “no longer sexy”, which has allowed Putin’s intervention in Syria to distract from Ukraine – “we are essentially playing his game”. First Opposition: Dame Barbara Stocking Dame Stocking is currently President of Murray Edwards College, and was previously CEO of Oxfam UK. “We are all global citizens and yet we are remarkably ill-informed about what is going on in the world”. Stocking spoke of how it was the media coverage of 9/11 which first informed her of Bin Laden, and likewise for the American people. Social media has alerted the public to the activity, positive or negative, of aid agencies. The major benefit of media coverage of crises is the resulting funding aid agencies receive. Second Proposition: Dr Emma Briant “Our timeline has shrunk…the crises we are talking about are now brought to us immediately”. Dr Briant, a sociologist studying Anglo-American relations, stressed the media bias towards crises of public interest: “a starving child in Aleppo is one thing”, but it is a crisis far from home.
  • The Future Availability of Natural Resources a New Paradigm For

    The Future Availability of Natural Resources a New Paradigm For

    World Scenario Series ResourceThe Future scarcity Availability of Natural Resources A New Paradigm for Global Resource Availability November 2014 © World Economic Forum 2014 - All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system. The views expressed are those of certain participants in the discussion and do not necessarily reflect the views of all participants or of the World Economic Forum. REF 231014 2 The Future Availability of Natural Resources Contents Preface 3 Preface The availability of natural resources, particularly food, water, energy and minerals, is an important issue but also a 5 Executive Summary highly contested one, mostly because of the many different 7 Section I. Resource Availability – in perspectives and opinions held by both experts and the the Eye of the Beholder general public. 8 The contested nature of resource This report takes a novel approach to enhance the availability understanding of natural resource availability over a 20-year time frame. It combines an analysis of the important factors 10 Paradigms of resource availability of supply and demand at a global level, with an investigation 12 Rising costs into the different dominant “paradigms” that stakeholders use Kristel Van der Elst in discussing or assessing natural resources, with paradigms Senior Director, Head 13 Long-term abundance of Strategic Foresight, in this context being a combination of different, often deeply held assumptions. The report presents three scenarios that 14 Social injustice World Economic Forum challenge these paradigms under different future conditions, 15 The perils of incomplete and also reveals a number of important insights that come paradigms from a deeper understanding of the complex interactions inherent in resource flows.
  • A New Business Model for Humanitarian Assistance? a Challenge Paper by the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on Humanitarian Assistance

    A New Business Model for Humanitarian Assistance? a Challenge Paper by the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on Humanitarian Assistance

    A NEW BUSINESS MODEL FOR HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE? A CHALLENGE PAPER by the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on Humanitarian Assistance Understanding conflict. Building peace. About International Alert International Alert is an independent peacebuilding organisation that has worked for over 20 years to lay the foundations for lasting peace and security in communities affected by violent conflict. Our multifaceted approach focuses both in and across various regions; aiming to shape policies and practices that affect peacebuilding; and helping build skills and capacity through training. Our field work is based in Africa, South Asia, the South Caucasus, Latin America, Lebanon and the Philippines. Our thematic projects work at local, regional and international levels, focusing on cross- cutting issues critical to building sustainable peace. These include business and economy, gender, governance, aid, security and justice. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding NGOs with more than 120 staff based in London and our 11 field offices. For more information, please visit www.international-alert.org © International Alert 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Layout by D. R. Ink, [email protected] Printed by PWPFS Front cover image: © Reuters, courtesy www.alertnet.org A New Business Model for Humanitarian Assistance? A challenge paper by the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on Humanitarian Assistance 2 International Alert Table of Contents Preface 3 Introduction 5 1. A comprehensive risk framework 7 2.
  • Programme for Printing

    Programme for Printing

    Global Agenda World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2013 Programme Davos-Klosters, Switzerland 23-27 January Programme Pillars Programme Programme and Sub-Pillars Icons Co-Chairs Leading Through Adversity Building Resilient Institutions Arts and Culture Frederico Curado, President and Chief Executive Officer, EMBRAER, Brazil; Global Risks Improving Decision-Making Chair/Co-Chair of the Governors for Aviation and Strengthening Personal Resilience BetaZone Travel for 2013 Forum Debate Muhtar A. Kent, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, The Coca-Cola IdeasLab Restoring Economic Company, USA Dynamism An Insight, An Idea Huguette Labelle, Chair, Achieving Inclusive Prosperity Transparency International, Televised session Germany; Global Agenda Rebuilding Economic Confidence Council on Responsible Mineral Lunch/Dinner session Resources Management Unleashing Entrepreneurial Innovation Andrew N. Liveris, Chairman WorkShop/WorkStudio session and Chief Executive Officer, The Dow Chemical Company, Interpretation USA Strengthening Societal Resilience On the record Atsutoshi Nishida, Chairman of the Board, Toshiba Reinforcing Critical Systems Corporation, Japan Sign-up required Sustaining Natural Resources Axel A. Weber, Chairman of the Board of Directors, UBS, Establishing Shared Norms Switzerland World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2013 - Programme 2 Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat 09.00 - 21.00 16.00 - 16.45 18.00 - 18.10 Congress Centre - Sanada Congress Centre - Congress Hall 1 registration 2 forum vision 3 welcoming address Registration Opens World Economic Welcoming Address Please pick up your badge at registration Forum Vision and by the Executive on Kurgartenstrasse. However, access to the Congress Centre will only begin at Mission Chairman 14.00. Professor Klaus Schwab invites all newcomers and interested participants to Simultaneous interpretation in all a briefing on the institution's strategic languages vision and latest initiatives.
  • The Pandemic Century

    The Pandemic Century

    THE PANDEMIC CENTURY MARK HONIGSBAUM The Pandemic Century One Hundred Years of Panic, Hysteria and Hubris HURST & COMPANY, LONDON First published in the United Kingdom in 2019 by C. Hurst & Co. (Publishers) Ltd., 41 Great Russell Street, London, WC1B 3PL © Mark Honigsbaum, 2019 All rights reserved. Printed in the United Kingdom The right of Mark Honigsbaum to be identified as the author of this publication is asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. A Cataloguing-in-Publication data record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: 9781787381216 The epigraph taken from René Dubos’ ‘Despairing Optimist’ is reproduced with kind permission of The American Scholar (Vol. 48, No. 2, Spring 1949). © The Phi Beta Kappa Society, 1949. This book is printed using paper from registered sustainable and managed sources. www.hurstpublishers.com For Mary-Lee “Everybody knows that pestilences have a way of recurring in the world; yet somehow we find it hard to believe in ones that crash down on our heads from a blue sky. There have been as many plagues as wars in history; yet plagues and wars always take people by surprise.” Albert Camus, The Plague (1947) CONTENTS Prologue: Sharks and Other Predators xi 1. The Blue Death 1 2. Plague in the City of Angels 37 3. The Great Parrot Fever Pandemic 67 4. The “Philly Killer” 99 5. Legionnaires’ Redux 121 6. AIDS in America, AIDS in Africa 135 7. SARS: “Super Spreader” 167 8. Ebola at the Borders 197 9. Z is for Zika 227 Epilogue: The Pandemic Century 261 Notes 267 Abbreviations 301 Acknowledgments 303 Index 305 ix PROLOGUE SHARKS AND OTHER PREDATORS Sharks never attack bathers in the temperate waters of the North Atlantic.
  • IMF Faces Structural Adjustment

    IMF Faces Structural Adjustment

    to consider the change. They will Staff in black: hold off any decision on salary cuts until the end of January. IMF faces structural adjustment Paying the piper? Further work on efficiency and reduced expenditures was to be Due to pressure from major shareholders the IMF must cut its budget. Internal documents completed for a meeting of the W board’s budget committee at start W reveal details of the restructuring, including staff layoffs and charges for technical February. Proposals on the table W assistance, but fail to shed light on whether the Fund will shift away from dictating to poor include a new department for mul - . B tilateral surveillance and forcing R countries and towards overseeing global markets. E staff to work on multiple countries T T in the proposed larger divisions. R O O The December announcement by B I N Rather than reducing the frequen - N H E managing director Dominique I G W H cy of Article IV reports, annual W A O Strauss-Kahn that he would lay off Y - check-ups on members’ economies, B U O R 300 to 400 staff, 15 per cent of the Y / Strauss-Kahn prefers “less-paper D T H O S work force, is being viewed as a R intensive” board discussions based O G P quid pro quo to secure US Treasury O O R D on mission statements and oral pre - O support for giving the IMF an sentations rather than formal J E endowment. The G7 has demand - papers. C ed that the IMF cut its expenses T For low-income countries there .