Curriculum Vitae List of Publications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mark Evan Bonds
MARK EVAN BONDS Department of Music 1064 Sweetflag Lane University of North Carolina Hillsborough, NC 27278 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3320 [email protected] ACADEMIC POSITIONS 1992- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Music, Cary C. Boshamer Distinguished Professor (2007- ); Professor (1997-2007); Associate Professor (1992-97) 1991 Harvard University, Department of Music, Visiting Assistant Professor (Fall Semester) 1988-92 Boston University, School of Music, Assistant Professor EDUCATION 1984-88 Harvard University, Ph.D. in Musicology (Dissertation: “Haydn’s False Recapitulations and the Perception of Sonata Form in the Eighteenth Century”) 1977-78 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, M.S. in Library Science 1975-77 Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel (W. Germany), M.A. in Musicology, with Distinction; Minor in German Literature (Thesis: “Das Cantus-firmus-Prinzip bei Haydn und Mozart”) 1971-75 Duke University, B.A. magna cum laude, with Distinction in Music PUBLICATIONS SCHOLARLY MONOGRAPHS Absolute Music: The History of an Idea. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Paperback ed. 2017. Russian translation (Moscow: Delo) under contract for publication in early 2019. Music as Thought: Listening to the Symphony in the Age of Beethoven. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. Paperback ed. 2014. Spanish translation: Barcelona: Acantilado, 2014. Japanese translation: Tokyo: Artes, 2015. After Beethoven: Imperatives of Originality in the Symphony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996. Reprint ed. 2013. Wordless Rhetoric: Musical Form and the Metaphor of the Oration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991. Reprint ed. 2013. Japanese translation: Tokyo: Ongaku No Tomo Sha, 2018. TEXTBOOKS Listen to This. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson, 2017. -
Fall 2020 INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS CATALOG
CHICAGO FALL BOOKS 2020 INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS EDITION Fall 2020 Guide to Subjects Anthropology 1 Art & Media Studies 3 Cartography 10 Economics 14 Education 21 History 26 American History 34 Law 41 Literature & Literary Criticism 45 Music 55 Philosophy 63 Political Science 67 Religion 77 Science 82 History of Science 88 Sociology 97 Cover and catalog design by Mary Shanahan NICHOLAS HARKNESS TABLE OF CONTENTS Note on Romanization Introduction Glossolalia and The Problem of Language Other Anthropological Objects the Problem of Chapter Overview 1. Abundance and the Ambivalent Gift Language 2. The Limits of Language 3. Feeling the Same Thing 4. Fusion and Force DECEMBER | 240 p. | 28 halftones, 5 tables | 6 x 9 | Cloth $105.00 Paper $35.00 5. Revelations 6. Deception Speaking-in-tongues is an enigmatic behavior, sometimes dismissed as Conclusion gibberish but described by believers as among the most intense experi- Appendix: The Nineteenth-Century ences of their lives. The hyper-aroused speech is usually associated Invention of Glossolalia; an Etymological with Pentecostals, but it is practiced across denominations and congre- Reconstruction gations worldwide. Among these Christians, the religious legitimacy Acknowledgments of glossolalia depends on its being perceived as actual speech used to Notes communicate directly with God. But what is at stake in calling glos- solalia a language? In Glossolalia and the Problem of Language, linguistic Bibliography anthropologist Nicholas Harkness argues that speaking in tongues lies at the intersection of numerous, often contradictory social forces, syncretic legacies, and spiritual desires that are amplified by Christian- ity’s massive institutionalization in Korea, his field site, and elsewhere. -
Renowned Beethoven Scholar and Pianist Joins Faculty the Christmas
WINTER 2003 sonoritiesThe News Magazine of the University of Illinois School of Music Renowned Beethoven Scholar and Pianist Joins Faculty The Christmas Gift of a Lifetime Mouthpiece Buzzers Have a Leader in Ronald Romm New Faculty Two Hundred Fifty-Two An American in York Alumni News Partners in Tempo Campus News Much has been written about the promise of this new century, and much has already occurred within our world to make us question anew our goals, our priorities, and indeed, our very identity. Assaulting our senses and shaking us to the core, the devastation that occurred on our own shores has created moments of misery and memory in each of our souls—but also, in our studios, sonorities rehearsal rooms, and performance stages. On this campus—and on Winter 2003 those all across the nation—colleagues turned to artists to provide emotional strength, to create a structure for grief, to nurture the glim- mer of hope, but most importantly, to sustain our deeply experienced Published for alumni and friends of the School of Music at the University of Illinois humanity. Our performances were not trivial, but whether experienced at Urbana-Champaign as performers or as audience, they had become essential. That recognition that the arts are essential to our individual identity The School of Music is a unit of the College and to the lives of our community releases for us—as if for the first of Fine and Applied Arts at the University time—the realization that we are indeed vitally communal. Acknowl- of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and has been an accredited institutional member of edging that the making of our performances requires community and the National Association of Schools of partnership, then by analogy, the advancing of our art requires collabo- Music since 1933. -
6770.Pdf (2.79
An Analytical Comparison of the Variation Movement from Ludwig van Beethoven’s Piano Sonata in E Major, Op. 109 to Johann Sebastian Bach’s Aria mit verschiedenen Veränderungen, BWV 988 (“Goldberg Variations”) A document submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in the Keyboard Studies Division of the College-Conservatory of Music by Eliana Maria Murphy BM, University of Colorado-Boulder, 2003 MM, University of Colorado-Boulder, 2005 Committee Chair: bruce d. mcclung, PhD Abstract The correlations between J. S. Bach’s Aria mit verschiedenen Veränderungen, BWV 988 (“Goldberg Variations”) (1741) and the variation movement of Ludwig van Beethoven’s Piano Sonata in E Major, Op. 109 (1820) may not be apparent at a cursory glance, yet upon closer examination, some striking parallels emerge. This document compares relevant excerpts of J. S. Bach’s “Goldberg Variations” and Beethoven’s Op. 109 variation movement, offering evidence that Beethoven indeed did use the “Goldberg Variations” as the inspiration for his musical invention in Op. 109’s last movement. While there is no proof that Beethoven ever heard a performance or read through a score of the “Goldberg Variations,” much circumstantial evidence points to the conclusion that he had several opportunities to do so. In the first chapter, I explore how Beethoven’s exposure to Bach’s music influenced his development as a composer, especially in his last compositional period. Special emphasis is given to the role that Gottfried, Baron van Swieten played in introducing Beethoven to many of Bach’s scores. -
Muzikološki Z B O R N I K L I
MUZIKOLOŠKI ZBORNIK MUSICOLOGICAL ANNUAL L I / 2 ZVEZEK/VOLUME L J U B L J A N A 2 0 1 5 MZ_2015_1_FINAL.indd 1 13.5.2015 12:44:22 Izdaja • Published by Oddelek za muzikologijo Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani Glavni in odgovorni urednik • Editor-in-chief Jernej Weiss (Ljubljana) Asistentka uredništva • Assistant Editor Tjaša Ribizel (Ljubljana) Uredniški odbor • Editorial Board Matjaž Barbo (Ljubljana) Aleš Nagode (Ljubljana) Svanibor Pettan (Ljubljana) Leon Stefanija (Ljubljana) Andrej Rijavec (Ljubljana), častni urednik • honorary editor Mednarodni uredniški svet • International Advisory Board Michael Beckermann (Columbia University, USA) Nikša Gligo (University of Zagreb, Croatia) Robert S. Hatten (Indiana University, USA) David Hiley (University of Regensburg, Germany) Thomas Hochradner (Mozarteum Salzburg, Austria) Bruno Nettl (University of Illinois, USA) Helmut Loos (University of Leipzig, Germany) Jim Samson (Royal Holloway University of London, UK) Lubomír Spurný (Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic) Katarina Tomašević (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Serbia) John Tyrrell (Cardiff University, UK) Michael Walter (University of Graz, Austria) Uredništvo • Editorial Address Oddelek za muzikologijo Filozofska fakulteta Aškerčeva 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija e-mail: [email protected] http://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/MuzikoloskiZbornik Prevajanje • Translations Urban Šrimpf Cena posamezne številke • Single issue price 10 EUR Letna naročnina • Annual subscription 20 EUR Založila • Published by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani Za založbo • For the publisher Branka Kalenić Ramšak, dekanja Filozofske fakultete Tisk • Printed by Birografika Bori d.o.o., Ljubljana Naklada 300 izvodov • Printed in 300 copies Rokopise, publikacije za recenzije, korespondenco in naročila pošljite na naslov izdajatelja. Prispevki naj bodo opremljeni s kratkim povzetkom (200–300 besed), izvlečkom (do 50 besed), ključnimi besedami in kratkimi podatki o avtorju. -
Genetic Criticism As an Integrating Focus for Musicology and Music Analysis
Revue de musicologie Tome 98 (2012) • no 1 p. xxx-yyy Genetic Criticism as an Integrating Focus for Musicology and Music Analysis William Kinderman In the context of music scholarship, the approach of genetic criticism or critique génétique offers a valuable means of healing disciplinary wounds inflicted by the arbitrary severing of topics that properly belong together in the same body of knowledge. In his seminal text on “Genetic Criticism: Origins and Perspectives” of 1979, Louis Hay wrote that “Of all the fairy godmothers present at the birth of genetic studies, no doubt the most powerful is the one we shall encounter at every turn, the spirit of paradox.”1 This capacity to embrace paradox helps explain the promising renewing potential of creative process studies. Elsewhere in his essay, Hay observed that “Today, in a whole series of domains, genetic analysis allows us to glimpse a transcendence of the contradictions that have sometimes divided modern criticism.”2 Now, thirty years later, Hay’s claim remains no less pertinent for musicol- ogy and music analysis. It has sometimes been fashionable to complain, as did Joseph Kerman in 1985, that “critical thought in music lags conceptually far behind that in the other arts” and even that “nearly all musical thinkers travel at a respectful distance behind the latest chariots (or bandwagons) of intellectual life in general.”3 Yet here too is lodged a paradox, since the fresh impulses Kerman 1. Louis Hay, “Genetic Criticism: Origins and Perspectives,” in J. Deppman, D. Ferrer and M. Groden (eds), Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-textes (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), p.