000 (Swiss-Eng)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

000 (Swiss-Eng) FIDELITY FUNDS SOCIÉTÉ D’INVESTISSEMENT À CAPITAL VARIABLE ESTABLISHED IN LUXEMBOURG SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS UNAUDITED October 2006 Fidelity Funds Contents Semi-Annual Report 2 Bond Funds Investment Manager’s Report 2 Euro Bond Fund 2,3,13,21 133 Board of Directors and Management Company 3 European High Yield Fund 2,3,13,21,25 135 Standardised Past Performance Information 4 International Bond Fund 21,25 138 Sterling Bond Fund 21 140 SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS US Dollar Bond Fund 13,21 142 13,21,25 Equity Funds US High Yield Fund 144 America Fund 1,2,3,21,24,25 6 Fidelity Lifestyle Funds 15 American Diversified Fund 2,3,9,21,24 8 Fidelity Target™ 2010 Fund 147 15 American Growth Fund 1,3,24 10 Fidelity Target™ 2020 Fund 159 ASEAN Fund 21,24,25 11 Fidelity Target™ 2010 Euro Fund (a fund also investing in shares, bonds and securities which 9,21,24 Asian Special Situations Fund 12 are not denominated in Euro) 15,21 169 Australia Fund 1,21 14 Fidelity Target™ 2015 Euro Fund China Focus Fund 17,24 15 (a fund also investing in shares, bonds and securities which are not denominated in Euro) 15,21 180 Consumer Industries Fund 1,2,3,4,24 16 1,2,3,16,21,24,25 Fidelity Target™ 2020 Euro Fund Emerging Markets Fund 17 (a fund also investing in shares, bonds and securities which Euro Blue Chip Fund 1,15,21,24 20 are not denominated in Euro) 15,21 191 EURO STOXX 50TM Fund 1,4,7,8,21 21 Fidelity Target™ 2025 Euro Fund European Aggressive Fund 2,3,15,17,21,24,25 22 (a fund also investing in shares, bonds and securities which are not denominated in Euro) 15,21 203 1,2,3,15,21,24 European Growth Fund 24 Fidelity Target™ 2030 Euro Fund 2,3,24 European Larger Companies Fund 27 (a fund also investing in shares, bonds and securities which European Mid Cap Fund 2,3,21 28 are not denominated in Euro) 15,21 215 European Smaller Companies Fund 1,2,3,15,21,24 29 INSTITUTIONAL RESERVED FUNDS Financial Services Fund 1,2,3,4,24 32 Equity Funds France Fund 21,24 33 Institutional America Fund 12 227 Germany Fund 21,24 34 Institutional Euro Blue Chip Fund 12,15 229 Global Focus Fund 2,3,9,15,24 35 Institutional European Larger Companies Fund 12 230 Global Property Fund 2,3,17,21 37 Institutional Global Focus Fund 12,15 231 Greater China Fund 2,3,9,24 38 Institutional Japan Fund 12 233 Health Care Fund 1,2,3,4,21,24 39 Institutional Pacific (ex-Japan) Fund Iberia Fund 2,3,21,24 40 (a fund that also invests in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore) 12 234 India Focus Fund 9,19,24 41 Bond Funds Indonesia Fund 24 43 Institutional Euro Bond Fund 12 235 Industrials Fund 1,2,3,4,24 44 15,21,24,25 International Fund 45 Financial Statements 24 Italy Fund 57 Statement of Net Assets 236 1,2,3,21,24,25 Japan Fund 58 Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Assets 260 9,24 Japan Advantage Fund 59 Notes to the Financial Statements 272 1,21,24 Japan Smaller Companies Fund 60 Portfolio Turnover Ratio 279 1,24 Korea Fund 62 Total Expense Ratio 280 2,3,24 Latin America Fund 63 Footnotes 281 24 Malaysia Fund 64 Directory 282 Nordic Fund 1,21,24 65 Pacific Fund 1,24 66 Singapore Fund 24 69 South East Asia Fund 1,2,3,21,24,25 70 Switzerland Fund 21,24 72 Taiwan Fund 9,24 73 Technology Fund 1,2,3,4,24 74 Telecommunications Fund 1,2,3,4,21,24 75 Thailand Fund 24 76 United Kingdom Fund 24 77 World Fund 1,2,3,15,24 78 Asset Allocation Funds FIDELITY PORTFOLIO SELECTOR (FPS) FPS Defensive Fund 15,21 90 FPS Global Growth Fund 15,21 94 FPS Growth Fund 15,21 107 FPS Moderate Growth Fund 15,21 118 Balanced Funds Euro Balanced Fund 15,21 130 Fidelity Funds - Institutional European Corporate Bond Fund (Euro) was authorised for distribution in Switzerland on 19 April 2006 by the Federal Banking Commission but had not yet been launched on 30 April 2006. 1 Semi-Annual Report – 31 October 2006 This unaudited Semi-Annual Report of Fidelity Funds does not constitute an offer of Shares. Shares are offered on the basis of the information contained in the current Prospectus (and the documents referred to within it) supplemented by the last available Annual Report of Fidelity Funds (“the Company”) and the latest Semi-Annual Report if published after such an Annual Report. Copies of the current Prospectus, latest Annual and Semi-Annual Reports and Portfolio Changes for the funds are available free of charge from the registered office of the Company or from any of the companies registered as Distributors of Fidelity Funds, or, for investors in Switzerland, from the Representative of the Company in Switzerland. This Semi-Annual Report has been approved for circulation in the United Kingdom by Fidelity Investments International, UK Distributor of Fidelity Funds, authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority. Investment Manager’s Report Performance Overview Global equity markets, with the exception of Japan, advanced over the six months under review. During this period, the MSCI World Index returned 4.8% in US dollar terms. Political instability, notably in the Middle East, nuclear testing in North Korea and rising interest rates helped engender uncertainty among investors. Nonetheless, most major markets rallied amid strong corporate results and a revival of consumer confidence in the US. However, slower-than-expected economic growth in the US dampened investor sentiment towards the end of October. In economic news, an upward trend in the price of oil throughout the first half of the period added to inflationary pressures and, as a result, the Federal Reserve (Fed) increased its benchmark lending rate, to 5.25% from 4.75% in two steps. However, in response to a slowing economy, the Fed paused its monetary tightening in August. Elsewhere, the Bank of England (BoE) increased its base rate by a quarter of a percentage point, to 4.75% in August, in a bid to control inflation. Meanwhile, the European Central Bank (ECB) increased its key interest rate three times to 3.25%. The ECB judged that risks to price stability in the medium to longer term remained high. Japan’s central bank ended its zero-rate policy and raised the overnight call rate to 0.25% in early July, as the country moved out of a deflationary phase. The performance of Japanese and South East Asian markets was strikingly divergent over the review period. Japan’s TOPIX returned -5.3% in yen terms, while the MSCI Pacific ex Japan Index returned 5.6% in US dollar terms. Japanese markets, in light of geopolitical tensions and weak economic data, were particularly erratic during the period. Despite concerns about a global slowdown and increases in interest rates, South East Asian bourses rose to record highs during the review period. However, there were minor setbacks in these markets following political crises in Taiwan and Thailand (in August and September), and nuclear testing by North Korea in October. In the UK, the FTSE All-Share Index returned 3.7% in sterling terms. Rising global interest rates and geopolitical tensions weighed upon the performance of equities in the beginning of the period. However, stocks picked up later, following a truce in the Lebanon and a dip in the price of oil in the second half of the period. Higher commodity prices, continuing bid talks and encouraging earnings growth further supported markets. Inflation remained above the BoE’s target level of 2%, while economic activity continued to be robust. The MSCI Europe ex-UK Index returned 6.3% in euro terms. After an uneasy start, stocks rose strongly due largely to encouraging corporate results, continued merger & acquisition activity and strong economic growth in the region. This buoyancy persisted in spite of concerns about the direction of oil prices and interest rates. The S&P 500 Composite Index returned 6.1% in US dollar terms. A deceleration in the housing market provided cause for concern, given the level of securitised debt (consumers borrowing against their homes) to fund spending. Besides having an adverse effect on GDP growth, this made equity investors apprehensive about the prospects of those companies whose earnings are driven by consumer demand. Nonetheless, healthy corporate earnings bolstered investor confidence, and the S&P touched a five-year high towards the end of October. Global bonds also performed robustly during the six-month period ending 31 October 2006, with the Lehman Brothers Global Aggregate Index returning 4.3% hedged in US dollar terms. This was due largely to the effect of monetary policy as well as inflationary expectations, which, in turn, were driven by rising oil prices. The prospect of a slowdown in the US economy buoyed bond markets towards the end of the period, as did a pause in monetary tightening by the Fed. Those investors searching for high yields preferred corporate bonds to government-issued securities. As a result, sub-investment-grade and emerging-market bonds outperformed investment-grade assets. 2 Board of Directors Edward C. Johnson 3d Chairman of the Board USA Barry R.J. Bateman Director United Kingdom Sir Charles Fraser, K.C.V.O.* Director United Kingdom Glen S. Fukushima* Director Japan Jean Hamilius* Director Grand Duchy of Luxembourg Simon M.
Recommended publications
  • TBR ISSUE - 4 JANUARY 2011 the Editorial Board of the Telecom Business Review
    ISSN 0973-9114 Convergent Billing-The Roadmap Ahead 3 Pavan Pachimatla & Bhanu Garg IT Disaster Recovery Planning 16 Amol Tode & Hemant Gavali Near Field Communication on Mobile- 33 The Next Generation Mobile Transactions Sunil Jogi & Giten Kulkarni Mobile Unified Communications and Challenges 46 K. Swayam Prabha. Managed Services: Analyzing Strategic Potential 53 in Emerging market Shahid Shaikh & Vikram Singh Mains The Evolving Handset Market in India: A study 62 of facts with reference to tier 2 & 3 cities Mr. Anuj Sidharth & Maruti Nandan Tripathi Self Care: Unleashing the Power of Superior 69 Customer Service Gaurav Patil, Aditya Chavan & Noopur Rangera Monetizing the convergence of Social Networking, 81 Mobile Phones & Location Based Services Sohag Sarkar Customer Acquisition Form Management & 94 Subscriber Verification Prashant Kislaya Outsourcing in Telecom Industry: The Road Ahead 100 Nagalakshmi S Billing for VoIP Services 112 Rahul Wargad An Overview of the Financial and Economic Impact 121 of 3G Auction in India, on the Union Budget, Telecom operators and the Indian economy Mr. A.V.Chirputkar & Mr. Prasanna Kulkarni Abstracts 134 TBR ISSUE - 4 JANUARY 2011 The Editorial board of the Telecom Business Review Chairman: Mr. Sunil Patil Director, Symbiosis Institute of Telecom Management, Pune Esteemed Members of the Editorial board: Dr. P.J. Joglekar, Telecom Consultant & Former Professor, IIT Delhi Dr. (Mrs) M.Sukhapure, Faculty in the field of Retail Management Editorial board gratefully acknowledges the contribution of : Mr. Sharad Vaze, Chartered Accountant Dr. Rajas Parchure Director, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune. Secretary of the Editorial board: Mr. Giri Hallur Asst. Professor (Telecom) SITM, Pune.
    [Show full text]
  • Dfa Investment Trust Co
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM N-Q Quarterly schedule of portfolio holdings of registered management investment company filed on Form N-Q Filing Date: 2004-10-27 | Period of Report: 2004-08-31 SEC Accession No. 0001104659-04-032148 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER DFA INVESTMENT TRUST CO Business Address 1299 OCEAN AVE CIK:896162| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1130 11TH FLOOR Type: N-Q | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-07436 | Film No.: 041100436 SANTA MONICA CA 90401 3103958005 Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM N-Q QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY Investment Company Act file number 811-7436 THE DFA INVESTMENT TRUST COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) 1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor, Santa Monica, CA 90401 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Catherine L. Newell, Esquire, Vice President and Secretary The DFA Investment Trust Company, 1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor, Santa Monica, CA 90401 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 310-395-8005 Date of fiscal year end: November 30 Date of reporting period: August 31, 2004 ITEM 1. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS. The DFA Investment Trust Company Form N-Q August 31, 2004 (Unaudited) Table of Contents Schedules of Investments The U.S. Large Company Series The Enhanced U.S. Large Company Series The U.S. Large Cap Value Series The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Intec Telecom Systems Launches Inter-Activate for Provisioning And
    Intec Telecom Systems launches Inter-activatE for provisioning and activation of multiple fixed, mobile IP and 3G services Submitted by: Intec Telecom Systems Tuesday, 23 April 2002 London – April 23rd, 2002 - Intec Telecom Systems, a world leader in Operations Support Systems (OSS) for telecoms companies, today announced the launch of Inter-activatE™, a carrier-grade application for flow-through provisioning and activation of multiple communications services over mobile, fixed, 3G and IP networks from a single platform. Incorporating Intec’s many years of experience in mediation and billing OSS, Inter-activatE offers the performance and functionality to support all types of carriers and can be easily integrated with an operator’s existing OSS/BSS solutions. Inter-activatE addresses the problems being experienced by many operators of rising cost and complexity, and reduced customer service, resulting from the multiple legacy provisioning systems required to activate complex, current and next-generation services. Inter-activatE allows operators to centralise all activation on a single system, through its capability to accept service requests from different systems (e.g. CRM, Order Management, Billing, etc.) and generate the required instructions to provision any combination of services on any network infrastructure. Inter-activatE provides fully automated, ‘flow-through’ capabilities, managing the provisioning and activation process with minimal operator intervention. Highly flexible user-configurable business rules allows complex provisioning scenarios, such as bundled voice, mobile, data and even cable TV services, to be activated from one request. Inter-activatE also includes comprehensive built-in audit trailing and fall-out management capabilities to ensure there is no customer satisfaction or revenue loss issues when delivering new customer requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Rules and Regulations Implementing ) Minimum Customer Account Record ) CG Docket No. 02-386 Exchange Obligations on All Local and ) Interexchange Carriers ) ) ) ) Comments of the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions The Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), on behalf of its Ordering and Billing Forum (OBF) Subscription Committee, hereby files these comments in response to the Federal Communications Commission’s (Commission) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the above-referenced docket regarding the Customer Account Record Exchange (CARE) process.1 In Section I of these comments, ATIS provides general background information regarding the industry’s development and maintenance of the CARE standard as documented in the ATIS OBF Equal Access Subscription Customer Account Record Exchange Industry Support Interface (Care/ISI) document. In Sections II and III, ATIS addresses several of the key issues framed by the Commission in the NPRM. Specifically, ATIS supports a mandatory obligation for all local service providers and interexchange carriers to participate in the exchange of CARE. Further, ATIS urges the Commission to recognize and endorse the continued development and maintenance of a single national CARE standard in the OBF, where the requisite industry expertise and experience resides. 1 NPRM, CG Docket No. 02-386, 69 Fed. Reg. 20845 (April 19, 2004). ATIS Comments June 3, 2004 CG Docket No. 02-386 Page 1 of 9 I. Background Information on ATIS, the OBF Subscription Committee and the CARE/ISI Document. ATIS: ATIS is a technical planning and standards development organization accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and committed to rapidly developing and promoting technical and operational standards for communications and related information technologies worldwide using a pragmatic, flexible and open approach.
    [Show full text]
  • OF NOTIFICATIONS Published from 1 January to 31 December 2003 (Nos
    INDEX OF NOTIFICATIONS published from 1 January to 31 December 2003 (Nos. 1422 - 1433) Note - The following symbols are used in this Index: C&C Geneva (1992) = Constitution of the International Telecommunication Union and Convention of the International Telecommunication Union (Geneva, 1992) Amendments Minneapolis (1998) = Instruments amending the Constitution and the Convention of the International Telecommunication Union (Geneva, 1992) (Minneapolis, 1998) Amendments Marrakesh (2002) = Instruments amending the Constitution and the Convention of the International Telecommunication Union (Geneva, 1992) (Marrakesh, 2002) Final Acts WRC-00 = Final Acts of the World Radiocommunication Conference, (Istanbul, 2000) __________________________________________ 3, Maidenhead, United Kingdom. Change of 1430, 1432. Peru: 1422, 1431. Poland: 1428. denomination (ITU-R, ITU-T): 1423. Qatar: 1424. Samoa: 1430. San Marino: 1422. 3G Americas, Bellevue, Washington, United States. Saudi Arabia: 1426. Senegal: 1427. Serbia and Participation SG 8 of ITU-R, SSG of ITU-T, Montenegro: 1430. Singapore: 1426. Slovakia: SG 2 of ITU-D: 1431. 1432. Somalia: 1430. Spain: 1430. Swaziland: 1430. Syrian Arab Republic: 1424. Tajikistan: ABFICT-Arab Business Forum for Information and 1423. Thailand: 1422. The Former Yugoslav Communication Technology, Cairo. Republic of Macedonia: 1432. Togo: Participation in ITU-D: 1432. 1430.Turkey: 1426. Vanuatu: 1429. Venezuela: Acterna Eningen GmbH, Eningen, Germany. Change of 1423, 1431. denomination (ITU-T): 1426. Advanced Space Business Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Acterna Germany GmbH, Eningen, Germany. Change Participation SG 6 of ITU-R: 1425. of denomination (ITU-T): 1426. Advanced Telecom Co., Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. AD “Makedonski Telekomunikacii”, Skopje, The Participation in ITU-D: 1431. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Afghan Wireless Communication Company, Kabul, Participation in ITU-D: 1422.
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® Nasdaq Composite Index® Fund
    Fidelity® Nasdaq Composite Index® Fund Semi-Annual Report May 31, 2021 Contents Note to Shareholders 3 Investment Summary 4 Schedule of Investments 6 Financial Statements 85 Notes to Financial 89 Statements Shareholder Expense 97 Example Board Approval of 98 Investment Advisory Contracts and Management Fees Liquidity Risk 106 Management Program To view a fund’s proxy voting guidelines and proxy voting record for the 12-month period ended June 30, visit http://www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) web site at http://www.sec.gov. You may also call 1-800-544-8544 to request a free copy of the proxy voting guidelines. Nasdaq®, OMX®, NASDAQ OMX®, Nasdaq Composite®, and The Nasdaq Stock Market®, Inc. are registered trademarks of The NASDAQ OMXGroup, Inc. (which with its Affiliates are the Corporations) and are licensed for use by Fidelity. The product has not been passed on by the Corporations as to its legality or suitability. The product is not issued, endorsed or sold by the Corporations. The Corporations make no warranties and bear no liability with respect to shares of the product. Standard & Poor’s, S&P and S&P 500 are registered service marks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and have been licensed for use by Fidelity Distributors Corporation. Other third-party marks appearing herein are the property of their respective owners. All other marks appearing herein are registered or unregistered trademarks or service marks of FMR LLC or an affiliated company. © 2021 FMR LLC. All rights reserved. This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • CSG Systems' Intec Named a Finalist in B/OSS Live! Excellence Awards
    Published on CSG International Newsroom (http://pr.news.csgi.com) on June 1, 2011 - 11:00am CSG Systems’ Intec Named a Finalist in B/OSS Live! Excellence Awards Release Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2011 11:00 am EDT Terms: Dateline City: ENGLEWOOD, Colo. Cost Management Category Showcases Superior Performance of Intec Inter-mediatE ENGLEWOOD, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE [1])--Intec [2], recently acquired by CSG Systems [3](NASDAQ: CSGS [4]) and one of the world’s leading providers of Business Support System (BSS) solutions to the global telecom industry, today announced that it has been named a finalist in the 2011 B/OSS Live! Excellence Awards in the Best Cost Management Implementation category for its deployment of Inter-mediatE v6 at Vivo, the largest wireless provider in Brazil. Widely acknowledged as the most scalable and flexible convergent mediation solution on the market, Inter-mediatE provides the lowest total cost of ownership by running on commodity blade technology. Inter-mediatE’s cost/performance ratio is unmatched, making it the mediation solution of choice, especially for the world’s largest operators, like Vivo, with daily processing volumes in the billions. This processing value is critical for all operators as data traffic continues to soar due to the strong adoption of smart phones and tablets, and the services they enable. Communications Service Providers, particularly wireless operators, need a cost-effective way to increase performance and throughput to handle exploding growth in both subscribers and usage. By leveraging Intec’s Inter-mediatE solution, carriers such as Vivo can reduce processing costs while improving performance, enabling them to not only satisfy consumer demands for new services, but to ensure profitability for those services as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® Nasdaq Composite Index® Fund
    Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Nasdaq Composite Index® Fund February 28, 2021 EIF-QTLY-0421 1.814098.116 Schedule of Investments February 28, 2021 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks – 99.7% Shares Value COMMUNICATION SERVICES – 16.7% Diversified Telecommunication Services – 0.2% Alaska Communication Systems Group, Inc. 34,501 $ 112,818 Anterix, Inc. (a) 7,844 331,252 ATN International, Inc. 7,220 351,470 Bandwidth, Inc. (a) (b) 12,082 1,913,306 Cogent Communications Group, Inc. (b) 25,499 1,526,115 Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (a) 21,768 114,500 Iridium Communications, Inc. (a) 77,117 2,954,352 Liberty Global PLC: Class A (a) 112,326 2,766,028 Class B (a) 327 7,521 Class C (a) 204,417 4,967,333 Liberty Latin America Ltd.: Class A (a) 17,405 190,933 Class C (a) 105,781 1,159,360 ORBCOMM, Inc. (a) 54,925 419,078 Radius Global Infrastructure, Inc. (a) (b) 37,222 460,808 Sify Technologies Ltd. sponsored ADR (a) (b) 7,275 22,916 Vonage Holdings Corp. (a) 142,421 1,882,806 19,180,596 Entertainment – 2.5% Activision Blizzard, Inc. 429,734 41,086,868 Bilibili, Inc. ADR (a) (b) 99,200 12,496,224 Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology (a) (b) 13,117 16,659 Chicken Soup For The Soul Entertainment, Inc. (a) 2,009 51,370 Cinedigm Corp. (a) 73,305 102,627 CuriosityStream, Inc. Class A (a) 24,573 426,833 DouYu International Holdings Ltd. ADR (a) 82,330 1,180,612 Electronic Arts, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Uber Technologies, Inc. (Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o Check the appropriate box: o Preliminary Proxy Statement o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) x Definitive Proxy Statement o Definitive Additional Materials o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 Uber Technologies, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): x No fee required. o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined). (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid o previously. Identify the previous filing by registration number, or on the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount previously paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: Uber’s Purpose Why we exist Who we are What we do To reimagine the way Fearless optimists: Make real life the world moves crazy enough to believe, easier to navigate for the better tenacious enough for everyone to make it happen Our Cultural Norms Our 8 cultural norms reflect who we are and where we’re going.
    [Show full text]
  • Intec Telecom Systems Enters Retail Billing Market with Acquisition of ‘Singl.Eview' Billing Software Division for $74.5 Million
    Intec Telecom Systems enters retail billing market with acquisition of ‘Singl.eView' billing software division for $74.5 million Submitted by: Intec Telecom Systems Tuesday, 31 August 2004 * Over 1000 Intec staff developing, implementing and supporting OSS family 31 August 2004 - Intec Telecom Systems PLC is pleased to announce that it has successfully completed the $74.5 million acquisition of the 'Singl.eView' retail billing software division from ADC Telecommunications, Inc. The award-winning Singl.eView product line, widely regarded to be one of the top retail billing solutions available, is in use at over 70 Tier 1 and Tier 2 carriers in 17 countries, including Deutsche Telekom, Virgin Mobile, Hutchison 3G, SingTel Optus, and Reliance. The deal approximately doubles Intec’s staff team, adding over 630 new employees worldwide, and creating a large professional services team of over 680 people. “With the acquisition of Singl.eView, Intec now has the three key revenue generating OSS applications: retail, interconnect and content, plus three critical network facing OSS, convergent mediation, service activation, and real-time charging,” said Intec Executive Chairman, Mike Frayne. “This product family, each one individually developed and proven to meet the most demanding, carrier grade requirements of Tier 1 operators, is unmatched in the OSS industry for breadth, performance, functionality and scalability. The acquisition also substantially enlarges our global presence with a total staff team of 1300 people based in 26 offices worldwide. Intec now has over 320 people in product development and over 680 in professional services, giving us a huge capability to develop and implement the most sophisticated OSS projects in the world.” The majority of the 70 active Singl.eView implementations are at larger (Tier 1 or large Tier 2) communications service providers, including Deutsche Telekom, Virgin Mobile, Reliance (India), SingTel Optus, XO Communications, Hutchison 3G, Tele2 and Inmarsat.
    [Show full text]
  • Mike Frayne, Executive Chairman, Intec Telecom Systems
    company logo Interconnect billing- Making Telecommunications Work for Africa by Mike Frayne, Executive Chairman, Intec Telecom Systems Article Abstract Charges to carriers for using the networks of others, or interconnect, is relatively new to many in Africa. Interconnect billing is a primary income source for many. Africa's favourable balance of traffic generates US$ 4 billion annually from interconnections, providing operators with vital foreign exchange revenue. Mediation platforms interface between the network and systems such as revenue assurance and fraud management allowing operators to collect information about their network traffic and helps operators support voice, IP and data for billing. Africa does not fit an investor's profile of a safe bet. Political instability, poverty, and struggling economies are usually the first things that come to mind for many Westerners. This view, though, belies the dynamic business climate that currently shapes the continent. Africa has many challenges to overcome but it offers more opportunities than setbacks, especially for telecommunications operators. The statistics surrounding Africa's potential are very attractive. According to the United Nations' International Telecommunication Union, more than 30 million people in Africa have access to mobile phones today compared to 2 million in 1998. By the end of 2003 that number will triple to 100 million, with many new subscribers in the North African and Southern region. The most advanced area for mobile communications is Southern Africa, which now supports 13 million users. The least developed country for the telecoms sector is Nigeria, which maintains the lowest tele-density rate and the largest population of any African nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrier's World Silver Sponsor Intec Launches Version 4.4 of Its
    Carrier's World silver sponsor Intec launches version 4.4 of its vanguard trading and routing product, InterconnecT OR Submitted by: Intec Telecom Systems Tuesday, 20 September 2005 • InterconnecT OR 4.4 uses leading-edge component-based technology to give unprecedented performance, scalability, interoperability and reliability • Notable competitive wins already for InterconnecT OR 4.4 with major EMEA and ASIA PAC carriers London, 20 September 2005: Intec Telecom System’s InterconnecT Optimised Routing solution continues to evolve, responding to market and customer feedback, and Intec’s ongoing commitment to research and development. Launched today at the 10th annual Carrier’s World event, InterconnecT OR 4.4, from the world’s leading supplier of wholesale billing systems, offers an enhanced solution for extended automatic capacity management, improved reporting, centralised alerting capabilities and comprehensive real-time quality and volume management. Said Gary Bunney, Intec COO Product Operations: "Two processes with paramount impact on wholesale business performance are trading and routing. With InterconnecT OR 4.4 and our broader wholesale portfolio Intec is uniquely positioned to offer carriers an unparalleled range of functionality, from CDR collection, correlation and enrichment to traffic trading, routing, billing, settlement and complete partner management.” Today’s carriers manage complex agreements among trading partners and traffic across an increasingly disparate set of networks and routing alternatives. Interconnect
    [Show full text]