DOCSLIB.ORG

Hycroft Mine Expansion Project B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hycroft Mine Expansion Project B BLM Black Rock FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Field Office/Winnemucca, Nevada DOI-BLM-NV-W030-2011-0001-EIS Hycroft Mine Expansion Project July 2012 Ne / Office District Winnemucca U.S. Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Office Black Rock Field Office 5100 E. Winnemucca Blvd. Winnemucca NV 89445-2921 vada It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/NV/WN/ES/12-2+1793 DOI-BLM-NV-W030-2011-0001-EIS HYCROFT MINE EXPANSION PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS................................................................................XIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... ES­1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1­1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1­1 1.2 Organization of Document ....................................................................................... 1­2 1.3 Purpose of and Need for Action ............................................................................... 1­7 1.4 Land Use Plan Conformance.................................................................................... 1­8 1.4.1 Sonoma Gerlach Management Framework Plan....................................... 1­8 1.4.2 Paradise Denio Management Framework Plan.......................................... 1­8 1.5 BLM and Non­BLM Policies, Plans, and Programs .............................................. 1­8 1.6 Authorizing Actions .................................................................................................. 1­8 1.7 Scoping ....................................................................................................................... 1­9 1.8 Issues......................................................................................................................... 1­10 1.9 Mine History and Existing and Approved Facilities............................................ 1­10 1.9.1 Mine History ................................................................................................ 1­10 1.9.2 Existing and Approved Facilities ............................................................... 1­11 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES.................. 2­1 2.1 Proposed Action......................................................................................................... 2­1 2.1.1 Open Pit Mining Methods ............................................................................ 2­3 2.1.2 Equipment...................................................................................................... 2­7 2.1.3 Waste Rock Facilities .................................................................................... 2­7 2.1.4 Heap Leach Facilities .................................................................................. 2­10 2.1.5 Storm Water Management ......................................................................... 2­20 2.1.6 Support Facilities......................................................................................... 2­21 2.1.7 Rights­of­Way and Leases .......................................................................... 2­22 2.1.8 Haul and Access Roads ............................................................................... 2­22 2.1.9 Transportation............................................................................................. 2­25 2.1.10 Employment ................................................................................................. 2­25 2.1.11 Public Safety ................................................................................................ 2­26 2.1.12 Chemical Use and Management................................................................. 2­26 2.1.13 Sustainability ............................................................................................... 2­27 2.1.14 Exploration................................................................................................... 2­27 2.1.15 Applicant­Committed Environmental Protection Measures .................. 2­28 2.1.16 Growth Media.............................................................................................. 2­31 2.1.17 Reclamation of Open Pits ........................................................................... 2­41 2.1.18 Reclamation of Waste and Development Rock Piles................................ 2­41 2.1.19 Reclamation of Heap Leach Facilities ....................................................... 2­49 2.1.20 Reclamation of Solution Ponds .................................................................. 2­52 2.1.21 Road Reclamation ....................................................................................... 2­53 2.1.22 Measures to Minimize Loading of Sediment to Drainage Channels ...... 2­53 2.1.23 Disposition of Buildings and Ancillary Facilities...................................... 2­54 2.1.24 Surface Facilities or Roads Not Subject to Reclamation ......................... 2­54 2.1.25 Post­Reclamation Monitoring and Maintenance...................................... 2­54 2.1.26 Drill Hole Plugging Procedures.................................................................. 2­55 2.1.27 Concurrent Reclamation ............................................................................ 2­55 2.2 Alternatives to the Proposed Action ...................................................................... 2­55 iii 2489U.HycroftEIS.FEIS.FINAL.docx HYCROFT RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT INC. HYCROFT MINE EXPANSION PROJECT ­ FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ­ 2.2.1 No Action Alternative ................................................................................. 2­56 � 2.2.2 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis........... 2­57 � 2.2.3 The BLM Preferred Alternative ................................................................ 2­60 � 2.3 Summary of Effects................................................................................................. 2­60 � 3 � AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES (DIRECT AND INDIRECT)............................................................................................... 3­1 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3­1 � 3.1.1 General Project Setting................................................................................. 3­1 � 3.1.2 Supplemental Authorities ............................................................................. 3­1 � 3.1.3 Additional Affected Resources ..................................................................... 3­3 � SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES ....................................................................................... 3­6 � 3.2 Air and Atmospheric Resources .............................................................................. 3­6 � 3.2.1 Regulatory Framework................................................................................. 3­6 � 3.2.2 Affected Environment................................................................................... 3­6 � 3.2.3 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures ........................ 3­10 � 3.3 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................. 3­27 � 3.3.1 Regulatory Framework............................................................................... 3­27 � 3.3.2 Affected Environment................................................................................. 3­27 � 3.3.3 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures ........................ 3­34 � 3.4 Migratory Birds....................................................................................................... 3­41 � 3.4.1 Regulatory Framework............................................................................... 3­41 � 3.4.2 Affected Environment................................................................................. 3­41 � 3.4.3 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures ........................ 3­44 � 3.5 Native American Religious Concerns.................................................................... 3­46 � 3.5.1 Regulatory Framework............................................................................... 3­46 � 3.5.2 Affected Environment................................................................................. 3­46 � 3.5.3 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures ........................ 3­47 � 3.6 Wastes and Materials (Hazardous and Solid) ...................................................... 3­49 � 3.6.1 Regulatory Framework............................................................................... 3­49 � 3.6.2 Affected Environment................................................................................. 3­49 � 3.6.3 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures ........................ 3­50 � 3.7 Water Quality (Surface and Ground) ................................................................... 3­54 � 3.7.1 Regulatory Framework............................................................................... 3­54 � 3.7.2 Affected Environment................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Josie Pearl, Prospector on Nevada's Black Rock Desert
    JUNE, 1962 40c • • • • . Author's car crossing the playa of Black Rock Desert in northwestern Nevada. On Black Rock Desert Trails When Dora Tucker and Nell Murbarger first began exploring the Black Rock country in northwestern Nevada they did not realize what a high, wide and wild country it was. On the Black Rock a hundred miles doesn't mean a thing. In the 10,000 square miles of this desert wasteland there isn't a foot of pavement nor a mile of railroad— neither gasoline station nor postoffice. Antelopes out-number human beings fifty to one. There's plenty of room here for exploring. By NELL MURBARGER Photographs by the author Map by Norton Allen S AN illustration of what the want to! Ain't nothin' there!" is known as "the Black Rock country," Black Rock country affords Thanking him, we accepted his re- the desert from which it derives its in the way of variety and con- port as a favorable omen and headed name actually is a stark white alkali trast, we made a J 50-mile loop trip out into the desert. Almost invariably playa, averaging a dozen miles in out of Gerlach last June. Our previous we find our best prowling in places width and stretching for 100 miles exploring of the region had been mostly where folks have told us there "ain't from Gerlach to Kings River. Merging in the northern and eastern sections, nothin'." imperceptibly with the Black Rock on so we hadn't the slightest idea of what Rising precipitously from the dead the southwest is the section known as we might find in the southern part.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Evolution of the Northern Sierra Nevada
    TECTONIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN SIERRA NEVADA BATHOLITH A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Nicholas James Van Buer December 2011 © 2011 by Nicholas James Van Buer. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/xb187vq0064 Includes supplemental files: 1. Plate 1. Geologic Map of the Jayhawk Well 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (jayhawkwell.pdf) 2. Plate 2. Geologic Map of the Juniper Pass 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (Juniperpass.pdf) 3. Plate 3. Geologic Map of the Tohakum Peak NE 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (TohakumpkNE.pdf) 4. Plate 4. Geologic Map of the Tunnel Spring 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (tunnelspr.pdf) 5. Plate 5. Geologic Map of the Bob Spring 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (bobspring.pdf) 6. Plate 6. Geologic Map of the Tohakum Peak SE 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (TohakumpkSE.pdf) 7. Plate 7. Geologic Map of the Sage Hen Spring 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (SageHenSpr.pdf) 8. Plate 8. Geologic Map of the Bluewing Spring 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (BluewingSpr.pdf) ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Winnemucca District Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-W000-2010-0001-EIS
    BLM Winnemucca District Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-W000-2010-0001-EIS Volume 2: Chapters 3, 4 Winnemucca District, Nevada District, Winnemucca August 2013 Winnemucca MISSION STATEMENT To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/NV/WN/ES/13-11+1793 Volume 2 of 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Resources ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Air Quality ............................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................. 3-14 3.2.3 Soil Resources .................................................................................. 3-18 3.2.4 Water Resources ............................................................................... 3-22 3.2.5 Vegetation – General ......................................................................... 3-36 3.2.6 Vegetation – Forest/Woodland Products ........................................... 3-41 3.2.7 Vegetation – Invasive and Noxious Species ...................................... 3-42 3.2.8 Vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of NEVADA Brian Sandoval, Governor
    STATE OF NEVADA Brian Sandoval, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Big Game Staff Biologist Pat Jackson, Carnivore Staff Biologist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer Staff Biologist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Matt Jeffress Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Jeremy Lutz Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts Cover photo credit: Mike Cox This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2017-2018 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical Data for Environmental Studies of Mercury Mines in Nevada
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geochemical Data for Environmental Studies of Mercury Mines in Nevada by John E. Gray, Monique G. Adams, James G. Crock, and Peter M. Theodorakos Open-File Report 99-576 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046, MS 973, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225-0046 ISBN 0-607-93726-2 1999 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director ________________________________________________________________________ For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: Chief Scientist, Central Region Books and Open-File Reports Mineral Resources Program U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25046, Federal Center Box 25046 Denver, CO 80225-0046 Denver, CO 80225-0046 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………….……………………………………………………….. 4 General Geology and Mineralogy…………………………....…………………………….………… 5 Sample Collection and Preparation………………………………………………………………….. 5 Analytical Methods……………….……………..…………………………………………………… 6 Solid Sample Analysis………………………...………………………………………………… 6 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry……………...………...……. 6 Atomic Absorption Spectrometry………..……………………………...………………….. 7 Water Sample Analysis…..……...……………...…..…………………………………………… 7 Inductively
    [Show full text]
  • Prospecting for a Blind Geothermal System Utilizing Geologic and Geophysical Data, Seven Troughs Range, Northwestern Nevada
    GRC Transactions, Vol. 38, 2014 Prospecting for a Blind Geothermal System Utilizing Geologic and Geophysical Data, Seven Troughs Range, Northwestern Nevada Corina Forson1, James E. Faulds1, and Phil Wannamaker2 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno NV 2Energy and Geoscience Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City UT Keywords resources. Researchers estimate that only ~20% of the accessible Nevada, Basin and Range, structural controls, Seven Troughs geothermal resources in the Great Basin have been discovered, Range, blind geothermal system, exploration, geologic map- suggesting that opportunities abound for discovering blind or ping, Magnetotelluric, two-meter survey hidden geothermal systems (Brook et al., 1979; Richards and Blackwell, 2002). If prospecting for a truly blind geothermal system, it becomes Abstract important to distinguish between a blind, hidden, and conventional geothermal resource. All geothermal systems have three main The Seven Troughs Range in Pershing County, Nevada, has elements: heat source (magmatic or high geothermal gradient in been identified as an area with high potential for hosting a blind amagmatic settings), reservoir (to hold and sustain the hot water), geothermal system. A reconnaissance 2D magnetotelluric (MT) and fluid, which is the medium that transfers the heat. Conven- survey across the western U.S. has shown a possible correlation tional geothermal systems exhibit fluid surface manifestations, between broad low resistivity anomalies, extending from the up- such as fumaroles or hot springs. Hidden geothermal systems per to deep crust, and loci of high enthalpy geothermal systems. lack fluid features on the surface but contain more subtle features Where MT surveys have been conducted across the Basin and (or paleo manifestations), such as siliceous sinter, travertine, tufa Range, anomalous zones of high conductivity strongly correlate deposits, and/or hydrothermally altered rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Some Mining Districts in Humboldt County, Neyada
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOE 4:14: NOTES ON SOME MINING DISTRICTS IN HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEYADA BY FREDERICK LESLIE RANSOME WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1909 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 7 Itinerary.................................................................. 9 General history of mining development..................................... 10 Literature................................................................. 13 Seven Troughs district..................................................... 14 Introduction.......................................................... 14 General geology........................................................ 15 Topography....................................................... 15 Early exploration................................................. 16 Pre-Tertiary rocks.................................................. 16 Tertiary volcanic rocks............................................. 18 Distribution and development of the mines............................. 20 Character of the deposits.............................................. 22 Outlook for the district................................................. 25 Rosebud district.......................................................... 25 Situation and history.......................... ; ........................ 25 General geology........................................................ 26 Ore deposits.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alodaibi's Dissertation-Thesis Office Convert to PDF 2
    TECTONIC VERSUS VOLCANIC ORIGIN OF THE SUMMIT DEPRESSION AT MEDICINE LAKE VOLCANO, CALIFORNIA by Mark Leon Gwynn A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Department of Geology and Geophysics The University of Utah May 2013 Copyright © Mark Leon Gwynn 2013 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of ________________________ Mark Leon Gwynn_______________________ has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: John M. Bartley , Chair January 8, 2013 Date Approved Michal Nemcok , Member January 15, 2013 Date Approved Richard D. Jarrard , Member January 10, 2013 Date Approved and by ______________________D. Kip Solomon______________________ , Chair of the Department of ___________________ Geology and Geophysics__________________ and by Donna M. White, Interim Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT Medicine Lake Volcano is a Quaternary shield volcano located in a tectonically complex and active zone at the transition between the Basin and Range Province and the Cascade Range of the Pacific Province. The volcano is topped by a 7x12 km elliptical depression surrounded by a discontinuous constructional ring of basaltic to rhyolitic lava flows. This thesis explores the possibility that the depression may have formed due to regional extension (rift basin) or dextral shear (pull-apart basin) rather than through caldera collapse and examines the relationship between regional tectonics and localized volcanism. Existing data consisting of temperature and magnetotelluric surveys, alteration mineral studies, and core logging were compiled and supplemented with additional core logging, field observations, and fault striae studies in paleomagnetically oriented core samples.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service
    Decision for the Humboldt River Field Office Blue Wing Complex Gather Plan DOI-BLM-NV-W010-2015-0034-EA INTRODUCTION The Blue Wing Complex is located 50 miles southwest of Winnemucca, primarily in the western half of Pershing County, Nevada. Portions of the Complex area extend into Humboldt, Churchill, and Washoe Counties. The gather area spans a distance of approximately 106 miles long and 55 miles wide. The Blue Wing Complex totals approximately 2,283,300 acres in size, with roughly 50% of the land identified as checkerboard land. The gather area encompasses five Herd Management Areas (HMAs), four Herd Areas (HAs), and non-HMA areas where wild horses and burros (WH&Bs) migrate back and forth. The HMAs consist of: Kamma Mountains, Seven Troughs Range, Lava Beds, Blue Wing Mountains, and Shawave. The HAs within the gather area comprise: Antelope Range, Selenite Range, Trinity Range, and Truckee Range. HAs are not managed for WH&B populations; however animals that migrate from HMAs were last removed in 1999. BLM staff has recorded WH&Bs in the Truckee, Trinity, Selenite and Antelope HAs during aerial censuses and on-the-ground monitoring. Based on the December 2014 aerial census, the USGS data analysis, plus the 2015, 2016 and 2017 foal crops; the Blue Wing Complex has approximately 3,340 WH&Bs. DECISION Based on the Blue Wing Complex Gather Plan Final Environmental Assessment (EA), DOI- BLM-NV-W010-2015-0034-EA, and associated Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), it is my decision to select the multiple gathers and removals with fertility control (Native PZP, GonaCon, or most effective formulation) tools from Alternative B for the Blue Wing Complex Gather as described in the EA.
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    CONTACT-METAMORPHIC TUNGSTEN DEPOSITS OF THE UNITED STATES. By FRANK L. HESS and ESPER S. LARSEN. INTRODUCTION. Production of tungsten ores in the United States. For years the United States has been not only one of the largest producers of tung­ sten concentrates but the largest producer of scheelite and ferberite, and in 1918 it was by far the largest producer of tungsten concen­ trates from contact-metamorphic deposits. Of the 5,061 short tons of concentrates carrying 60 per cent of tungsten trioxide (WO3) produced in this country in 1918, 2,734 tons was scheelite, and of this scheelite 1,427 tons was obtained from contact-metamorphic de- posits, a quantity equaled by the total output of only a few other countries. The quantity would probably have been increased ma­ terially had not the price of tungsten fallen after the signing of the armistice. Our total output of tungsten in 1918 was, however, less than half the output of wolframite from the Chinese placers (including a small quantity from veins), probably equivalent to more than 11,200 tons of concentrates carrying 60 per cent of tungsten trioxide. Definition. Contact-metamorphic tungsten deposits have been formed through the combined action of the heat and solutions ema­ nating from a cooling intrusive granitic magma on limestones and the other intruded rocks and to a less extent on the granitic rock itself, by which the rocks are altered to or replaced by an aggregate of garnet, epidote, diopside, quartz, calcite, scheelite, and other minerals. Most deposits of this class are at or very near the contacts, and they clearly represent replacement of the limestones and other rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Pershing County Master Plan 2012
    Pershing County Master Plan Pershing County, Nevada Adopted by the Pershing County Commission December 15, 2012 Acknowledgments Pershing County Board of County Commissioners Patrick Irwin, Chairman Carol Shank, Vice Chairman Darin Bloyed Karen Wesner, Administrative Assistant to the County Commission Pershing County Planning Commission Galen Reese, Chairman Clarence Hultgren, Vice Chairman Alan List Lynn “Lou” Lusardi Elaine Pommerening Margie Workman Carl Clinger Project Staff Michael K. Johnson, Planning & Building Director CJ Safford, Building Inspector Consultant Much of the data included in this plan came from the 2002 Master Plan with Stantec Consulting Inc gather this information. Cynthia J. Albright, MA, AICP Stantec Consulting Inc. 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Reno, NV 89511 775-850-0777 For additional information please visit the Pershing County web-site www.pershingcounty.net or contact the Planning & Building office (775) 273-2700, Fax (775) 273-3617. Pershing County Planning & Building PO Box 1656 Lovelock, Nevada, 89419 Pershing County Master Plan December 1 5, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Page 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 5 Why Plan? ............................................................................................................................5 What is in the Master Plan? .................................................................................................5 How was the Master Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistory and History of the Winnemucca District : a Cultural
    BLM LIBRARY BL D MANAGEMENT NE 88000265 PREHISTORY and HISTORY of t\)e WINNEMUCCA DISTRICT A Cultural Resources Literature Overview REGINA C. SMITH PEGGY McGUCKIAN JONES JOHN R. RONEY KATHRYN E. PEDRICK CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES No. 6 1983 NEVADA BLM CULTURAL RESOURCES PUBLICATIONS Technical Reports No. 1 Studies at Adams -McGill Reservoir: Exercises in Applying Small Project Data to Archaeological Research . Robert York (Nov. 1977). ca. 18 pp. No. 2 Archaeological Survey of Springs, Tonopah Resource Area . Roberta L. McGonagle and Lynda L. Waski (Feb. 1978). 60 pp. No. 3 Oil and Gas/Geothermal Program Inventories . Nancy Botti, Peggy McGuckian, Robert York and Mark Henderson (June 1979). ca. Ill pp. No. 4 Artifact Assemblages from the Pahranagat, Lincoln County, Nevada . Robert H. Crabtree and David D. Ferraro (Jan. 1980). 74 pp. No. 5 Test Excavations at Painted Cave, Pershing County, Nevada . James C. Bard, Colin I. Busby and Larry S. Kobori (Feb. 1980). 153 pp. No. 6 Emigrant Trails in the Black Rock Desert . Peggy McGuckian Jones (Apr. 1980). 110 pp. No. 7 An Historic Overview of the BLM Shoshone-Eureka Resource Area, Nevada . Patrick H. Welch (1981). 47 pp. No. 8. Archaeological Studies in the Cortez Mining District, 1981 . Donald L. Hardesty and Eugene M. Hattori (1982). 59 pp. No. 9 The History and Archaeology of Fenelon, a Historic Railroad Camp . Arnie L. Turner (1982). 61 pp. Cultural Resources Series No. 1 The Pony Express in Central Nevada: Archaeological and Documentary Perspectives . Donald L. Hardesty (1979). 175 pp. No. 2 A Cultural Resources Overview of the Carson $ Humboldt Sinks, Nevada .
    [Show full text]