DOCSLIB.ORG

Modern Portfolio Theory Statistics and What They Mean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modern Portfolio Theory Statistics and What They Mean Insight May 2013 Vol. No. 3 No. 2 www.ipexusa.com Modern Portfolio Theory Statistics and What They Mean Given the events of the last several Beta: Although alpha precedes beta in years, investors have become more the Greek alphabet, beta is a Mission attuned to the risk characteristics of necessary precursor to understanding Statement investments. As volatility in the alpha. Beta can generally be defined market continues, investors are as the risk factor of a portfolio to the To provide paying more attention to the market, which is usually achieved independent relationship between the and objective potential for reward and the likelihood of experiencing investment losses. Modern Portfolio consulting Theory (MPT) is used by services to many investment not-for-profit professionals to help organizations. investors make appropriate investing and asset allocation decisions. MPT is rooted in the assertion that there is no free lunch, as investors can only obtain higher returns if Shale P. Lapping they are willing to take on President more risk. Knowledge of MPT statistics through asset allocation. A beta such as alpha, beta, and R-squared number of 1.00 implies that the are useful to understanding and portfolio will perform exactly how the Steven J. Cupchak quantifying this risk/reward landscape. continued on page 3 Vice President IPEX - Investment Performance Evaluation Xperts Kathleen Serafino IPEX is a boutique firm owned by active employees. IPEX advises clients in Vice President structuring, implementing and evaluating their investment programs. IPEX helps clients develop investment policy statements, conduct money manager searches, prepare asset allocation studies and monitor investment 888-IPEX-USA performance. IPEX offers a full range of investment consulting functions. IPEX maintains no affiliation with any money manager or brokerage firm. Our only source of compensation is the fees we receive from our clients. IPEX can work with a client’s existing managers and financial institutions or we can help clients to replace their service providers. The independent structure of our firm enables IPEX to provide objective advice Scan to go to and recommendations, thereby ensuring that clients make informed decisions our website and fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities. Page 2 Insight Investing with a Long-Term Focus It’s easy to follow a long-term investment strategy in good times; the hard part is sticking with it during bad times. What should you do if your organization is a long-term investor sitting in the midst of a bear market? If you are holding a well-diversified “Volatile markets can portfolio, the answer is rather cause investors to straightforward: stay the course. abandon their long- term goals for risky Volatile markets can cause investors to short-term investment abandon their long-term goals for risky short-term investment strategies. strategies.” Volatility can range from a single-day market crash to extended periods of jagged performance. The market has undergone cycles with high and low annual returns from 38% (1995) to - instead of lump-sum purchases, to 37% (2008) over just the past 20 ease into new investments. Dollar-cost years. It can be tough to stay the averaging involves the purchase of course in the face of such fluctuations. securities, usually mutual funds, in fixed dollar amounts at regular The graph illustrates annual stock intervals. This strategy is maintained market performance since 1963. The no matter what direction the market is bull market from 1991 to 1999 lasted moving. Finally, staying focused on a the longest, with an average annual long-term investment plan should help return of 21%. In contrast, a majority your investment program to of the downturns shown in the image participate in recoveries. have lasted for shorter periods of time. “...with a disciplined Despite the ups and downs over the Overall, the stock market has exhibited positive performance in the approach to investing, years, the stock market generated a compound annual return of 9.8% over past, but be prepared for periods of one may be able to this historical time period. underperformance, which can be take advantage of sustained. The fact is no one can market rebounds...” It goes without saying that the market predict market declines with any type will head south at times, but history of certainty. Regardless, with a shows that despite these bumps, the disciplined approach to investing, one market’s long-term trend is upward. may be able to take advantage of market rebounds and enjoy solid A disciplined investment approach is returns in the long run. Don’t be still the best strategy for handling sidelined by (or overreact to) market market downturns. This includes expansions and contractions. Stay the maintaining a well-diversified portfolio course! and using dollar-cost averaging, May 2013 Page 3 Modern Portfolio Theory continued from page 1 market performs. A beta number greater cognizant of the fact that a higher beta than 1.00 implies that the portfolio will does not necessarily equate to a higher perform better than the market when the alpha; a portfolio with a high beta may market is going up, and worse than the well sport a negative alpha. This is due market when the market is going down. to the fact that the greater the risk the “… being able to Conversely, a beta number lower than portfolio assumes, the higher the hurdle generate alpha is 1.00 means that the portfolio is expected the portfolio must overcome in order to touted as the holy to perform worse than the market when outperform the market. grail of investing.” the market is going up, and better than the market when the market is going R-squared: The R-squared value is a down. As Beta can be used to track number that measures the strength of a performance against any market, it is relationship (correlation), important to understand how the market is demonstrating how much a portfolio’s being defined. performance can be explained by the performance of its benchmark. The Alpha: Alpha, a measure of the excess higher the R-squared value, the more return generated by a portfolio that goes closely the portfolio’s performance can beyond the benchmark, is the residual (or be explained by the index it tracks. The skill/luck-based) component of active lower the R-squared value, the more management, allowing money managers likely the portfolio doesn’t behave much to display their value. The benchmark is like its index. R-squared values can usually a market index that the portfolio range from zero, meaning there’s no can be compared against to assess its degree of performance correlation “Investors trying to performance relative to the market. If between a market benchmark and a understand or alpha is positive, it means that the given portfolio, to 100, meaning that a portfolio returned more than its expected portfolio is highly correlated with the interpret these return from the market (after taking the index. More importantly, a higher R- MPT statistics are portfolio’s Beta into consideration), squared number validates the relevance best advised to whereas a negative alpha indicates that of the alpha and beta numbers. seek Professional the portfolio returned less. investment Alpha and beta are the heart of advice...” Should investors be impressed if a money traditional performance (risk and manager is generating positive alpha for return) analysis, although they do their portfolio? In general, yes, being able come with their own caveats and to generate alpha is touted as the holy limitations. Investors trying to grail of investing; it’s an indication that understand or interpret these MPT your money manager has been able to statistics are best advised to seek generate an above-average return relative professional investment advice to to the risk that he or she is taking on. ensure they are allocating risk However, before investors put too much appropriately. A better understanding stock in the statistic, it’s important to of these statistics can go a long way in know what these statistics mean, and why making better investment decisions. they are important. Investors should be www.ipexusa.com Page 4 1st Qtr 2013 Returns Fixed Income Domestic Stocks +2.8 High Yield Bonds +13.2 Small Cap Growth -0.1 Investment Grade Bonds +12.9 Mid Cap Core -0.5 Treasury Inflation Protected Bonds +12.3 Large Cap Value -1.6 Emerging Market Bonds +11.6 Small Cap Value -3.5 Developed Market Bonds + 9.5 Large Cap Growth International Stocks Alternatives +8.4 International Small Cap +8.4 Real Estate +5.4 Asia/Pacific Region +5.0 Long/Short Funds +5.1 International Large Cap +3.2 Global Macro Funds Quarterly Market Barometer Market Quarterly +2.4 European Region +0.4 Market Neutral Funds -1.6 Emerging Markets -1.1 Commodities .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Dollar Cost Averaging?
    Massachusetts Deferred Compensation SMART Plan Office of State Treasurer and Receiver General EDUCATE What Is Dollar Cost Averaging? SAVE MONEY AND RETIRE TOMORROW Dollar cost averaging is a technique that allows you to regularly contribute money over time to help avoid timing risk (i.e., trying to pick just the right day when prices are low so you can buy more shares).1 • Dollar cost averaging is a simple, systematic investment approach in which you invest a fixed-dollar amount at regular intervals. With your payroll contribution, you are already taking advantage of dollar cost averaging. • With a fixed-dollar amount, you purchase more shares when prices are low, while you purchase fewer shares when prices are high. • Typically, your average cost per share will be lower than your average price per share. How It Works Example: Jennifer wants to invest a total of $2,400 in the market over four months. Month Amount Invested Price per Share Number of Shares Average Price per Share: Sum of Prices $114 January $600 $20 30 Number of Purchases / 4 February $600 $24 25 Average Price per Share $28.50 March $600 $30 20 Average Cost per Share: April $600 $40 15 Total Amount Invested $2,400 Total $2,400 $114 90 Number of Shares / 90 FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. This hypothetical illustration does not represent the performance of any investment options. Average Cost per Share $26.67 How to Use It If you are currently regular paycheck contributions, then you are already taking advantage of this principle. Otherwise, log on to the website at www.mass-smart.com or call (877) 457-1900 to specify your dollar cost average setup date.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Risks of Smart Beta and the Need for Smart Alpha
    UNDERSTANDING THE RISKS OF SMART BETA, AND THE NEED FOR SMART ALPHA February 2015 UNCORRELATED ANSWERS® Key Ideas Richard Yasenchak, CFA Senior Managing Director, Head of Client Portfolio Management There has been a proliferation of smart-beta strategies the past several years. According to Morningstar, asset flows into smart-beta offerings have been considerable and there are now literally thousands of such products, all offering Phillip Whitman, PhD a systematic but ‘different’ equity exposure from that offered by traditional capitalization-weighted indices. During the five years ending December 31, 2014 assets under management (AUM) of smart-beta ETFs grew by 320%; for the same period, index funds experienced AUM growth of 235% (Figure 1 on the following page). Smart beta has also become the media darling of the financial press, who often position these strategies as the answer to every investor’s investing prayers. So what is smart beta; what are its risks; and why should it matter to investors? Is there an alternative strategy that might help investors meet their investing objectives over time? These questions and more will be answered in this paper. This page is intentionally left blank. Defining smart beta and its smart-beta strategies is that they do not hold the cap-weighted market index; instead they re-weight the index based on different intended use factors such as those mentioned previously, and are therefore not The intended use of smart-beta strategies is to mitigate exposure buy-and-hold strategies like a cap-weighted index. to undesirable risk factors or to gain a potential benefit by increasing exposure to desirable risk factors resulting from a Exposure risk tactical or strategic view on the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Beta Strategies
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Korn, Olaf; Kuntz, Laura-Chloé Working Paper Low-beta strategies CFR Working Paper, No. 15-17 [rev.] Provided in Cooperation with: Centre for Financial Research (CFR), University of Cologne Suggested Citation: Korn, Olaf; Kuntz, Laura-Chloé (2017) : Low-beta strategies, CFR Working Paper, No. 15-17 [rev.], University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR), Cologne This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/158007 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten
    [Show full text]
  • Disciplined Alpha Dividend As of 6/30/2021
    Disciplined Alpha Dividend As of 6/30/2021 Equity Sectors (Morningstar) Growth of $100,000 % Time Period: 1/1/2003 to 6/30/2021 Consumer Defensive 22.3 625,000 Healthcare 15.8 550,000 Consumer Cyclical 14.7 Financial Services 13.9 475,000 Industrials 12.6 400,000 Technology 8.2 325,000 Energy 4.4 250,000 Communication Services 3.7 Real Estate 2.5 175,000 Basic Materials 1.9 100,000 Total 100.0 25,000 Strategy Highlights Pursues a high level of current income and long-term capital appreciation utilizing Trailing Returns Inception Date: 1/1/2003 proprietary top-down and bottom-up analysis Seeks a substantially higher dividend yield than the broad market YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 10 Yrs 15 Yrs Incpt Invests primarily in 25- 50 companies with dividend growth potential Disciplined Alpha Dividend (Gross) 16.19 40.38 14.47 14.15 12.74 10.09 10.18 Offers the potential for competitive upside performance in strong market Disciplined Alpha Dividend (Net) 15.63 39.02 13.28 12.93 11.51 8.82 8.90 environments and the potential for lower downside risk in weak environments Morningstar US Value TR USD 17.03 41.77 10.76 11.29 10.92 7.61 9.43 Calendar Year Returns Disciplined Alpha Dividend – Top Holdings* 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 Portfolio Disciplined Alpha Dividend (Gross) 8.62 25.26 -3.48 16.20 17.06 -3.52 11.05 38.86 10.97 2.96 Weighting % Disciplined Alpha Dividend (Net) 7.51 23.91 -4.54 14.93 15.72 -4.58 9.81 37.33 9.67 1.77 Exxon Mobil Corp 2.52 Welltower Inc 2.43 Morningstar US Value TR USD -1.31 25.09 -7.51 14.23 20.79 -2.16
    [Show full text]
  • Dollar Cost Averaging - the Role of Cognitive Error…………….Page 44
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Hayley, S. (2015). Cognitive error in the measurement of investment returns. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/13172/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] COGNITIVE ERROR IN THE MEASUREMENT OF INVESTMENT RETURNS Simon Hayley Thesis submitted for the award of PhD in Finance, Cass Business School, City University London, comprising research conducted in the Faculty of Finance, Cass Business School. April 2015 1 Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures………………………………………………………...page 3 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….page 6 Summary and Motivation…………………………………………………………page 7 Chapter 1: Literature Review…………………………………………………...page 13 Chapter 2: Dollar Cost Averaging - The Role of Cognitive Error…………….page 44 Chapter 3: Dynamic Strategy Bias of IRR and Modified IRR – The Case of Value Averaging……………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory∗
    ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY∗ Gur Huberman Zhenyu Wang† August 15, 2005 Abstract Focusing on asset returns governed by a factor structure, the APT is a one-period model, in which preclusion of arbitrage over static portfolios of these assets leads to a linear relation between the expected return and its covariance with the factors. The APT, however, does not preclude arbitrage over dynamic portfolios. Consequently, applying the model to evaluate managed portfolios contradicts the no-arbitrage spirit of the model. An empirical test of the APT entails a procedure to identify features of the underlying factor structure rather than merely a collection of mean-variance efficient factor portfolios that satisfies the linear relation. Keywords: arbitrage; asset pricing model; factor model. ∗S. N. Durlauf and L. E. Blume, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, forthcoming, Palgrave Macmillan, reproduced with permission of Palgrave Macmillan. This article is taken from the authors’ original manuscript and has not been reviewed or edited. The definitive published version of this extract may be found in the complete The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics in print and online, forthcoming. †Huberman is at Columbia University. Wang is at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the McCombs School of Business in the University of Texas at Austin. The views stated here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Introduction The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) was developed primarily by Ross (1976a, 1976b). It is a one-period model in which every investor believes that the stochastic properties of returns of capital assets are consistent with a factor structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Alpha in Equity Trading Steps to Increasing Returns with the Advanced Use of Information
    THE HIDDEN ALPHA IN EQUITY TRADING STEPS TO INCREASING RETURNS WITH THE ADVANCED USE OF INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 MARKET FRAGMENTATION AND THE GROWTH OF INFORMATION 5 3 THE PROLIFERATION OF HIGH FREQUENCY TRADING 8 4 FLASH CRASHES, BOTCHED IPOS AND OTHER SYSTEMIC CONCERNS 10 5 THE CHANGING INVESTOR-BROKER RELATIONSHIP 11 6 THE INFORMATION OPPORTUNITY FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS 13 7 STEPS TO FINDING HIDDEN ALPHA AND INCREASED RETURNS 15 1. INTRODUCTION Following regulatory initiatives aimed at creating THE TIME DIFFERENCE IN TRADING competition between trading venues, the equities market has fragmented. Liquidity is now dispersed ROUTES; PEOPLE VS. COMPUTERS across many lit equity trading venues and dark pools. This complexity, combined with trading venues becoming electronic, has created profit opportunities for technologically sophisticated players. High frequency traders (HFTs) use ultra-high speed connections with trading venues and sophisticated trading algorithms to exploit inefficiencies created by the new market vs. structure and to identify patterns in 3rd parties’ trading that they can use to their own advantage. Person Computer For traditional investors, however, these new market conditions are less welcome. Institutional investors find JUST HOW FAST ARE TRADERS PROCESSING TRADES? themselves falling behind these new competitors, in » Traders that take advantage of technology can create large part because the game has changed and because programs that trade in milliseconds. In many cases they lack the tools
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Alpha Versus Beta in High Yield Bond Investing
    PERITUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC Market Commentary Independent Credit Research – Leveraged Finance – July 2012 Understanding Alpha versus Beta in High Yield Bond Investing Investors have come to recognize that there is a secular change occurring in financial markets. After the 2008 meltdown, we have watched equities stage an impressive rally off the bottom, only to peter out. There is no conviction and valuations are once again stretched given the lack of growth as the world economy remains on shaky ground. In another one of our writings (“High Yield Bonds versus Equities”), we discussed our belief that U.S. businesses would plod along, but valuations would continue their march toward the lower end of their historical range. So far, this looks like the correct call. Europe still hasn’t been fixed, the China miracle is slowing and, perhaps, the commodity supercycle is also in the later innings. The amount of debt assumed by the developed world is unsustainable so deleveraging began a few years ago. These are not short or pleasant cycles and both governments and individuals will be grumpy participants in this event. It simply means that economic growth will be subdued for years to come. I have never really been able to understand economic growth rates that are significantly ahead of the population growth anyway…oh yeah, the productivity miracle. I have written chapter and verse on the history of financial markets and where returns have come from: yield. Anyone with access to the internet can verify that dividends, dividend growth and dividend re-investment are what have driven stock returns over the decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Dollar Cost Averaging a Disciplined Approach to Long-Term Investing
    Dollar Cost Averaging A disciplined approach to long-term investing Dollar cost averaging is a systematic approach to investing. It is a strategy that Is this strategy right for you? overlooks day-to-day market fluctuations and acknowledges the difficulty in pinpointing the best time to invest. Instead, a fixed dollar amount is invested Dollar cost averaging is designed for investors who: regularly over a period of time. While it does not guarantee a profit or protect from a loss, it simply focuses on asset accumulation and avoids guesswork. • Seek a plan to help deal with market fluctuations. Market fluctuations can make it difficult to determine the best time to invest. A • Do not wish to invest all their widely accepted investment strategy called dollar cost averaging can help money at one time. smooth out market fluctuations. The key to this long-term strategy is persistence. Whether the market rises or falls, dollar cost averaging can work in • Can continue the program your favor. That’s because when you dedicate a fixed dollar amount to invest on a through both rising and falling regular basis, your average cost per share over time will be lower than your markets without selling all or average price per share. part of the assets. Accumulating shares When you invest using dollar cost averaging, you: • buy more shares when the price is low • buy fewer shares when the price is high Over time, dollar cost averaging may help you increase the numbers of shares you purchase and, at the same time, decrease your average share price.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Hedge Fund Returns: Alpha, Beta, and Costs
    Yale ICF Working Paper No. 06-10 September 2006 The A,B,Cs of Hedge Funds: Alphas, Betas, and Costs Roger G. Ibbotson, Yale School of Management Peng Chen, Ibbotson Associates This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract=733264 Working Paper The A,B,Cs of Hedge Funds: Alphas, Betas, and Costs Roger G. Ibbotson, Ph.D. Professor in the Practice of Finance Yale School of Management 135 Prospect Street New Haven, CT 06520-8200 Phone: (203) 432-6021 Fax: (203) 432-6970 Chairman & CIO Zebra Capital Mgmt, LLC Phone: (203) 878-3223 Peng Chen, Ph.D., CFA President & Chief Investment Officer Ibbotson Associates, Inc. 225 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 700 Chicago, IL 60601-7676 Phone: (312) 616-1620 Fax: (312) 616-0404 Email: [email protected] August 2005 June 2006 September 2006 1 The A,B,Cs of Hedge Funds ABSTRACT In this paper, we focus on two issues. First, we analyze the potential biases in reported hedge fund returns, in particular survivorship bias and backfill bias, and attempt to create an unbiased return sample. Second, we decompose these returns into their three A,B,C components: the value added by hedge funds (alphas), the systematic market exposures (betas), and the hedge fund fees (costs). We analyze the performance of a universe of about 3,500 hedge funds from the TASS database from January 1995 through April 2006. Our results indicate that both survivorship and backfill biases are potentially serious problems. The equally weighted performance of the funds that existed at the end of the sample period had a compound annual return of 16.45% net of fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Theory and Applications to Financial Data Analysis Basic Investment Equation
    Risk and Portfolio Management Spring 2010 Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Theory and Applications To Financial Data Analysis Basic investment equation = Et equity in a trading account at time t (liquidation value) = + Δ Rit return on stock i from time t to time t t (includes dividend income) = Qit dollars invested in stock i at time t r = interest rate N N = + Δ + − ⎛ ⎞ Δ ()+ Δ Et+Δt Et Et r t ∑Qit Rit ⎜∑Qit ⎟r t before rebalancing, at time t t i=1 ⎝ i=1 ⎠ N N N = + Δ + − ⎛ ⎞ Δ + ε ()+ Δ Et+Δt Et Et r t ∑Qit Rit ⎜∑Qit ⎟r t ∑| Qi(t+Δt) - Qit | after rebalancing, at time t t i=1 ⎝ i=1 ⎠ i=1 ε = transaction cost (as percentage of stock price) Leverage N N = + Δ + − ⎛ ⎞ Δ Et+Δt Et Et r t ∑Qit Rit ⎜∑Qit ⎟r t i=1 ⎝ i=1 ⎠ N ∑ Qit Ratio of (gross) investments i=1 Leverage = to equity Et ≥ Qit 0 ``Long - only position'' N ≥ = = Qit 0, ∑Qit Et Leverage 1, long only position i=1 Reg - T : Leverage ≤ 2 ()margin accounts for retail investors Day traders : Leverage ≤ 4 Professionals & institutions : Risk - based leverage Portfolio Theory Introduce dimensionless quantities and view returns as random variables Q N θ = i Leverage = θ Dimensionless ``portfolio i ∑ i weights’’ Ei i=1 ΔΠ E − E − E rΔt ΔE = t+Δt t t = − rΔt Π Et E ~ All investments financed = − Δ Ri Ri r t (at known IR) ΔΠ N ~ = θ Ri Π ∑ i i=1 ΔΠ N ~ ΔΠ N ~ ~ N ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ 2 ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ E = θ E Ri ; σ = θ θ Cov Ri , R j = θ θ σ σ ρ ⎜ Π ⎟ ∑ i ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ Π ⎟ ∑ i j ⎜ ⎟ ∑ i j i j ij ⎝ ⎠ i=1 ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ij=1 ⎝ ⎠ ij=1 Sharpe Ratio ⎛ ΔΠ ⎞ N ⎛ ~ ⎞ E θ E R ⎜ Π ⎟ ∑ i ⎜ i ⎟ s = s()θ ,...,θ = ⎝ ⎠ = i=1 ⎝ ⎠ 1 N ⎛ ΔΠ ⎞ N σ ⎜ ⎟ θ θ σ σ ρ Π ∑ i j i j ij ⎝ ⎠ i=1 Sharpe ratio is homogeneous of degree zero in the portfolio weights.
    [Show full text]
  • Leverage and the Beta Anomaly
    Downloaded from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109019000322 JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS COPYRIGHT 2019, MICHAEL G. FOSTER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WA 98195 doi:10.1017/S0022109019000322 https://www.cambridge.org/core Leverage and the Beta Anomaly Malcolm Baker, Mathias F. Hoeyer, and Jeffrey Wurgler * . IP address: 199.94.10.45 Abstract , on 13 Dec 2019 at 20:01:41 The well-known weak empirical relationship between beta risk and the cost of equity (the beta anomaly) generates a simple tradeoff theory: As firms lever up, the overall cost of cap- ital falls as leverage increases equity beta, but as debt becomes riskier the marginal benefit of increasing equity beta declines. As a simple theoretical framework predicts, we find that leverage is inversely related to asset beta, including upside asset beta, which is hard to ex- plain by the traditional leverage tradeoff with financial distress that emphasizes downside risk. The results are robust to a variety of specification choices and control variables. , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at I. Introduction Millions of students have been taught corporate finance under the assump- tion of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and integrated equity and debt markets. Yet, it is well known that the link between textbook measures of risk and realized returns in the stock market is weak, or even backward. For example, a dollar invested in a low beta portfolio of U.S. stocks in 1968 grows to $70.50 by 2011, while a dollar in a high beta portfolio grows to just $7.61 (see Baker, Bradley, and Taliaferro (2014)).
    [Show full text]