Pope Paul VI Is a Saint! Chris Manion / October 17, 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pope Paul VI Is a Saint! Chris Manion / October 17, 2018 Pope Paul VI is a Saint! Chris Manion / October 17, 2018 Saint Paul VI Puerto Rico UNHCR Pope Paul VI is a Saint! “Pope Paul VI is a saint,” Holy Mother Church declared to the faithful gathered in Saint Peter’s Square on Sunday October 14, 2018. Indeed he is. And Saint Paul VI is beloved above all for his two historic contributions to the Church: First, upon the death of Saint John XXIII in 1963, he inherited the Second Vatican Council and presided over it until it adjourned on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception on December 8, 1965. And second, he promulgated Humanae Vitae, the encyclical that announced to the world that, while the “spirit of the times” might change, the truth does not. Today Saint Paul VI is remembered above all for Humanae Vitae, and that is appropriate: the Second Vatican Council had many fathers; Humanae Vitae has only one. On July 25, 1968, Saint Paul VI stood alone when he confronted the decadent age that had plunged headlong into the sexual revolution. Deserted by many among the faithful, both cleric and lay, he held up a mirror up to the secular world and warned of the dangerous consequences that would follow on its flight from truth and beauty. Alas, the world responded with resentment and spite, and went its own way. Francis Cardinal Stafford describes that year as “Gethsemane.” And, like Jesus in the Garden, Saint Paul VI wept when he saw the depths to which the world would fall when it defied the laws of nature and of nature’s God. pop.org | Pope Paul VI is a Saint! | 1 Saint Paul VI offered to the world an alternative – the Church’s promise of truth and beauty. And how could it not be true and beautiful? The gentle, clear, but firm unfolding of the mystery of Sacramental marriage and its role in God’s plan for the family, the world, and salvation is central to the most beautiful story ever told. The good, the true, and the beautiful are simple, limpid, and loveable. The evil, the false, and the ugly debauch reality in a thousand ways. There is only one good, but there are countless ways to deny, defy, and defile it – all designed as preambles to its destruction. The family was designed by God to reflect the mystery, unity, diversity, and perfection of the Trinity. Those who hate the designer will hate the design – including the design written on their own hearts. In the past fifty years we have learned that the Dictators of Relativism are anything but relativists: they are devoted and hardened apostles of ugliness, sin, and lies. Even before Humanae Vitaewas published, they plotted to destroy both the teaching and the Church that taught it. For many years Paul’s encyclical gathered dust on countless shelves. But today, a growing number of bishops have picked up the fallen standard and are preaching it to a world hungry for the truth. More will follow, as they see how vital is its message to every generation. We at the Population Research Institute want to help them in every possible way. That’s why PRI has created a new website, humanaevitaeproject.org. It serves as a clearing house for information on life, love, and the family. There we offer countless resources to families, students, scholars, and clerics throughout the world – in four languages! This is a labor of love. While Saint Paul VI did not pretend to be a prophet, Humanae Vitaehas proven to be prophetic indeed. And while he called upon bishops and priests to teach this beautiful doctrine, Paul called on parents and teachers to do so as well. In this generation, that task has fallen to the laity in a special way, because it is in the home that children first learn about love and the gift of life. In our secular culture, it falls to families to raise good children and teach them, prayerfully working with our bishops and priests to champion the truths that Blessed Paul VI bequeathed to the Church and to the world. This is the challenge that Father Paul Marx, O.S.B., accepted when he founded the Population Research Institute. It is the challenge that inspires us today. It is a privilege and a grace for all of us at PRI to share Humanae Vitaewith the world on the occasion of the pop.org | Pope Paul VI is a Saint! | 2 Church’s joyous announcement of the canonization of Saint Paul VI. Second Segment Puerto Rico Senate Introduces Sweeping Bill to Ban Abortion after 20 Weeks Pro-Lifers to Show Support for PS 950 at March for Life in San Juan this Friday The Puerto Rico Senate has introduced a bill that would go a long way towards protecting Life in the Commonwealth. The bill (PS 950) would introduce a wide array of pro-life laws to Puerto Rico including a ban on abortion after 20 weeks, a ban on sex-selective and eugenic abortion, and would require informed consent for women seeking abortion and parental consent for abortions performed on minors. Called the “Law for the Protection of Women and Preservation of Life”, PS 950 would contain a number of provisions similar to those adopted by many states in the U.S. to protect the life and safety of both women and their unborn children. “In Puerto Rico, it is legal to abort a baby up to the ninth month, minors can get abortions without parental notification,” says Ginna Pennance, Director of Communications for Fieles a la Verdad, a pro-life organization in Puerto Rico supporting the passage of PS 950. “Since 1973 abortion has been legally practiced in Puerto Rico with up an estimated 15 to 20,000 abortions performed every year,” says Daisy Quiles from Mujeres 950, a pro-life organization in Puerto Rico advocating for the bill, “Puerto Rico is the only territory of the USA without regulation on abortion.” What would PS 950 do? The bill would ban all abortion after 20 weeks, except in the case of a medical emergency, the point at which many scientists believe the unborn child is capable of experiencing pain.[1][2][3][4][5] The bill would also prohibit sex-selective abortion and would prevent eugenic abortion of unborn children diagnosed with genetic disabilities. Any doctor who violates these provisions would be punished with 15 years in prison. The bill would also prohibit physicians from performing abortions on minors without the knowledge or consent of their parents. Ever since the Puerto Rico Supreme Court’s decision in Pueblo v. Duarte Mendoza (1980), it has been fully legal in Puerto Rico for minors to have an abortion without parental consent or notification. “A minor needs the consent of her parents before being evaluated by a dentist or pop.org | Pope Paul VI is a Saint! | 3 ophthalmologist … it is worrisome that, in Puerto Rico today, a minor 12 years of age can go to an abortion clinic to end her pregnancy, without the consent of her parents,” Senator Nayda Venegas Brown, the bill’s sponsor, had commented, according to an informational fact sheet published by Fieles a la Verdad. PS 950 addresses this shortcoming in the law by requiring that at least one parent or legal guardian must provide written consent at the abortion clinic and must provide a copy of their government-issued ID. However, in cases where parents are opposed to their daughter’s abortion, she may obtain a consent waiver from a judge. In additional to parental consent and gestational limits on abortion, PS 950 would require abortions after the first 12 weeks of pregnancy to be performed in an authorized hospital. This provision would help prevent standalone private facilities like Kermit Gosnell’s late- term clinic from performing second and third trimester abortions. PS 950 further makes it very clear that infants that survive an abortion attempt are protected under Puerto Rico law, and that any doctor who causes the death of an abortion survivor, including by negligence or refusal to provide emergency care, is guilty of a felony. The bill would also introduce a number of measures to ensure that women undergoing abortion are permitted to provide their full informed consent. PS 950 would require physicians to provide women with information on the medical risks of having an abortion, including by informing them that the abortion will “end the life of a whole, separate and unique life.”[6] They would also be required to provide women with their name and contact information as well as contact information for the local hospital in case of an emergency. Under PS 950, physicians would be required to offer women the opportunity to view an ultrasound of their baby. The bill would further establish a de facto 48-hour waiting period to ensure that women seeking abortion are given sufficient time to consider the risks of abortion and are allowed time to come to a decision of whether to go through with the abortion free from coercion. The bill would also require abortion facilities to post signage informing women that they have the right not to be forced by family members or medical staff into having an abortion. While Puerto Rico’s Penal Code prohibits abortion except to save the life or health of the mother, a series of decisions handed-down by Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court in the early 1980’s eviscerated the Commonwealth’s pro-life laws and emptied them of any meaningful enforcement. pop.org | Pope Paul VI is a Saint! | 4 In 1980, the Puerto Rico Supreme Court in Pueblo v.
Recommended publications
  • International Human Rights Law and Abortion in Latin America
    Human Rights and Abortion July 2005 International Human Rights Law and Abortion in Latin America Latin America is home to some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the world. While only three countries—Chile, El Salvador, and the Dominican Republic—provide no exceptions or extenuating circumstances for the criminal sanctions on abortion, in most countries and jurisdictions, exceptions are provided only when necessary to save the pregnant woman’s life and in certain other narrowly defined circumstances. Even where abortion is not punished by law, women often have severely limited access because of lack of proper regulation and political will. Advancing access to safe and legal abortion can save women’s lives and facilitate women’s equality. Women’s decisions about abortion are not just about their bodies in the abstract, but rather about their human rights relating to personhood, dignity, and privacy more broadly. Continuing barriers to such decisions in Latin America interfere with women’s enjoyment of their rights, and fuel clandestine and unsafe practices, a major cause of maternal mortality in much of the region. Latin American women’s organizations have fought for the right to safe and legal abortion for decades. Increasingly, international human rights law supports their claims. In fact, international human rights legal instruments and interpretations of those instruments by authoritative U.N. expert bodies compel the conclusion that access to safe and legal abortion services is integral to the fulfillment of women’s human rights generally, including their reproductive rights and rights relating to their full and equal personhood. This paper offers (1) a brief overview of the status of abortion legislation in Latin America and (2) an in-depth analysis of international human rights law in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 161 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 No. 134 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was all-State performer in track and was my colleagues continue to debate its called to order by the Speaker pro tem- the kicker on the football team in high validity. Well, if the devastating global pore (Mr. ALLEN). school. After graduating from North and environmental threats aren’t proof f Hardin High School near Fort Knox, enough, let me share some of the nega- Cameron joined the U.S. Navy, turning tive impacts climate change is having DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO down a track scholarship. on our air quality and public health TEMPORE More personally, Cameron was a son, now. The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- an uncle, and a fiance. Cameron grad- Simply put, climate change and air fore the House the following commu- uated from the Kentucky State Police pollution make a dangerous pair. In nication from the Speaker: Academy in January and had been a fact, air pollution is among the most WASHINGTON, DC, trooper for less than 9 months. serious, indirect health effects of glob- September 17, 2015. Among the many condolences that al climate change. The same power I hereby appoint the Honorable RICK W. have been shared are those of his plants that release harmful carbon di- ALLEN to act as Speaker pro tempore on this former Navy colleagues, who talked oxide into our atmosphere also create day.
    [Show full text]
  • Misguided at Best, Malevolent at Worst: the International Impact of United States Policy on Reproductive Rights
    UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law Volume 6 Symposium: The Transnational Legal Ordering of Privacy and Speech Article 6 5-27-2021 Misguided at Best, Malevolent at Worst: The International Impact of United States Policy on Reproductive Rights Lindsay Marum University of California, Irvine School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucijil Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Lindsay Marum, Misguided at Best, Malevolent at Worst: The International Impact of United States Policy on Reproductive Rights, 6 UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 103 (2021). Available at: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucijil/vol6/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UCI Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of UCI Law Scholarly Commons. Misguided at Best, Malevolent at Worst: The International Impact of United States Policy on Reproductive Rights Lindsay Marum* This Note discusses the effect of U.S. foreign policies on the reproductive rights of women in developing countries. Many international human rights treaties and their progeny have consistently found that reproductive rights are intertwined with basic human rights, such as the right to privacy, the right to health, the right to education, and the right to start a family. Despite considering itself a superpower among all other countries, U.S. policies like the Helms Amendment and the Mexico City Policy fail to adhere to these basic international human rights standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Responsibility: Women, Society and Abortion Worldwide
    SHARINGTHEALANGUTTMACHERINSTITUTE RESPONSIBILITYWOMEN SOCIETY &ABORTION WORLDWIDE STHE HALAN AGUTTMACHERRIN INSTITUTEG RESPONSIBILITY WOMEN SOCIETY &ABORTION WORLDWIDE Acknowledgments haring Responsibility: Women, Society and Pathfinder International, Peru; Tomas Frejka, independent Abortion Worldwide brings together research consultant, United States; Adrienne Germain, International findings about induced abortion and Women’s Health Coalition, United States; Forrest S unplanned pregnancy from the work of The Greenslade, Harrison McKay and Judith Winkler, Ipas, Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), assisted by a large num- United States; Dale Huntington, Population Council, ber of individuals and organizations. Susheela Singh, direc- Egypt and United States; Ngozi Iwere, Community Life tor of research at AGI, oversaw the development of this Project, Nigeria; Shireen Jejeebhoy, consultant, Special report, which is based on analyses conducted by her, Programme of Research, Development and Research Stanley Henshaw, deputy director of research, Akinrinola Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Bankole, senior research associate, and Taylor Haas, research Organization, Switzerland and India; Evert Ketting, inter- associate. Deirdre Wulf, independent consultant, wrote the national consultant on family planning and sexual and report, which was edited by Dore Hollander, senior editor, reproductive health, Netherlands; Firman Lubis, Yayasan and Jeanette Johnson, director of publications. Kusuma Buana, Indonesia; Paulina Makinwa-Adebusoye, The
    [Show full text]
  • June 2017 Hyperlinks
    POPULATION Volume 49, Issue 2 CONNECTIONJune 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL MIGRANTS, PUSHED FROM HOME BY CLIMATE CHANGE President’s Note tudents on more than 300 college campuses around the Global Gag Rule. Highlights from our #Fight4HER campaign United States are receiving the Population Connection this spring include: message through our grassroots outreach. We see firsthand Sthat young people are deeply concerned about the future and • Presenting a cardboard cutout of Sen. Cory Gardner with willing to work hard to change our course. the ‘Worst Women’s Advocate’ Award, in front of his state office in Fort Collins, CO; Here are some recent student comments following my presen- • Holding an “empty chair” town hall for Sen. Thom Tillis in tations, of which I’ve done two dozen this spring alone: Chapel Hill, NC that engaged folks on social media using “Interesting how much population growth can decrease if #TimidTillis and #Fight4HER; we increase education of women, provide birth control, and • Organizing a teach-in at Ohio State University on change reproductive health laws.” International Women’s Day that drew 1,000 students, staff, – Daniel, Widener University and community members to an all-day series of talks, fol- “I enjoyed the demeanor and calmness of the presentation. lowed by a march; and Even if the subject matter is a little more than daunting with • Delivering 22,000 petitions to Sen. Pat Toomey’s office in regards to our future.” Allentown, PA to support the Global HER Act. – Ben, California State University, Northridge “I have very strong conservative views, but the presentation This spring’s high point came when 352 activists representing 34 was very insightful and thought provoking.” states and 131 congressional districts spent a weekend one block – Ian, Duke University from the White House learning about our issue, and then took to “First time in my four years [in college] that a presenter has Capitol Hill to deliver our message to 190 congressional offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing a Right to Abortion Through the Back Door: the Need for Integrity in the U.N. Treaty Monitoring System, and Perhaps a Treaty Amendment
    Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs Volume 6 Issue 1 June 2018 Pushing a Right to Abortion through the Back Door: The Need for Integrity in the U.N. Treaty Monitoring System, and Perhaps a Treaty Amendment Andrea Stevens Follow this and additional works at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons ISSN: 2168-7951 Recommended Citation Andrea Stevens, Pushing a Right to Abortion through the Back Door: The Need for Integrity in the U.N. Treaty Monitoring System, and Perhaps a Treaty Amendment, 6 PENN. ST. J.L. & INT'L AFF. 71 (2018). Available at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol6/iss1/6 The Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs is a joint publication of Penn State’s School of Law and School of International Affairs. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 2018 VOLUME 6 NO. 1 PUSHING A RIGHT TO ABORTION THROUGH THE BACK DOOR: THE NEED FOR INTEGRITY IN THE U.N. TREATY MONITORING SYSTEM, AND PERHAPS A TREATY AMENDMENT Andrea Stevens* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 72 II. INTERNATIONAL LAW DOES NOT RECOGNIZE A RIGHT TO ABORTION ................................................................................. 75 A. Inferring a Right to Abortion Under U.N. Treaties .......... 78 1. Inferring a Right to Abortion from the Right to Life ...................................................................................... 79 a. The Right to Life Under the ICCPR ...................... 81 b. Ireland’s Inconsistent Interpretation of the ICCPR ......................................................................... 84 c. The Right to Life Under the CRC ........................... 86 2. Inferring a Right to Abortion from the Right to Health ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Herbal Abortion Tea
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Capstones Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism Fall 12-16-2016 Drink Me and Abort Your Baby: The Herbal Abortion Tea Maya Lewis Cuny Graduate School of Journalism How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gj_etds/152 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Drink Me and Abort Your Baby: The Herbal Abortion Tea By Maya Lewis Through the glass front door of the Sacred Vibes Apothecary in Ditmas Park, Brooklyn a jar of black cohosh root sits on the middle of the top shelf, in between jars of astragalus root powder and broadleaf. The label reads: “Black Cohosh Root (Cimicifuga racemosa) Relaxant and normalizer of female ​ ​ reproductive system. Painful and delayed menses, ovarian cramps, or womb cramps.” It’s best for, among other things — aborting a baby. I asked for two ounces of the herb. Melissa Edwards, the herbalist on staff, walked over to the towering wall and stood on her tiptoes to grab the jar, just inches above her arms reach. She was tiny with a kind smile and shoulder-length hair that she often kept tucked behind her ears. The shop was empty. She walked behind the counter and began to pour the earthy, mulch-like substance into a small brown paper bag sitting on an electronic scale. They were running low on black cohosh root and so the price had been raised to $18.00 an ounce, she said.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign to Legalise Abortion in Venezuela Gains Publicity | V
    Campaign to Legalise Abortion in Venezuela Gains Publicity | v... http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/7452 NEWS: GENDER AND SEXUALITY (/TOPIC/GENDER-AND-SEXUALITY) | PARTICIPATION (/TOPIC /PARTICIPATION) Campaign to Legalise Abortion in Venezuela Gains Publicity By EWAN ROBERTSON Mérida, 9th November 2012 (Venezuelanalysis.com) - The campaign to legalise abortion in Venezuela gained greater publicity this week, with advocacy groups showing optimism after a law to legalise abortion was passed in Uruguay last month. In Venezuela the law currently states that voluntary abortion of pregnancy is punishable for up to two years in prison. Although the law is rarely applied, the illegality of abortion means many women seeking the procedure resort to clandestine means, with one study by the Central University of Venezuela estimating that 16% of maternal deaths in Venezuela are a result of complications from clandestine abortions. The Venezuelan coalition of left-wing feminist groups, the Feminist Spider, has submitted a reform for discussion in the Venezuelan National Assembly which would modify the country’s penal law to legalise abortion up to the 12th week of pregnancy. In an interview yesterday on the program “Up Front” on Venezuelan state channel VTV, campaigner Tatiana Rojas argued that Venezuela was ready to have a public discussion about the legal right to abortion. Referring to the quantity of calls her organisation “Skirts in Revolution” receives to their information line, which gives advice on safe abortion methods, Rojas said, “Abortion isn’t a hypothetical situation, it’s a reality, it’s being done by women every day…our sisters, our neighbours; it’s a reality that we have to deal with.” Rojas, whose group was formed in 2011, and whose acronym in Spanish stands for “Feminists in Free and Direct Action for Safe Abortion", also argued that clandestine abortion is a class issue, as the options available to women opting for abortion differ depending on socio-economic background.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Film in Venezuela and Mexico, 1980-2010 Contesting and Supporting State Power
    UNIVERSITY OF OSLO The power of film in Venezuela and Mexico, 1980-2010 Contesting and supporting state power Audun Solli January 2014 PhD dissertation Audun Solli University of Oslo Faculty of Humanities 2014 © Audun Solli KULTRANS, University of Oslo Printer: O7 Gruppen ASP ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... vii Summary ................................................................................................................................ xi Sammendrag .......................................................................................................................... xii Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Problem statement ............................................................................................................... 1 Issues and objective: cultural and political power ............................................................... 2 Central argument ................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 5 Structure ............................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter one. Communicating society: the power of
    [Show full text]
  • Unsafe Abortion
    Unsafe abortion Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000 Fourth edition World Health Organization Geneva, 2004 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000. -- 4th ed. 1.Abortion, Induced - epidemiology 2.Abortion, Induced - mortality 3.Review literature I.Title. ISBN 92 4 159180 3 (NLM classification: WQ 440) © World Health Organization, 2004 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dissemination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications—whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution— should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The methodology of estimation has been reviewed and cleared for publication by Claudia Stein of the Evidence and Information for Policy (EIP) Cluster. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 161 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JANUARY 22, 2015 No. 11 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER Mr. KILDEE. Mr. Speaker, just the called to order by the Speaker. The SPEAKER. The Chair will enter- night before last the President ad- f tain up to five requests for 1-minute dressed this body and laid out an agen- da that we all might not agree with PRAYER speeches on each side of the aisle. certain elements, but there are ele- The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick f ments that we could certainly act J. Conroy, offered the following prayer: FACTS REVEAL PRESIDENT’S JOB upon. Thank You, God, for giving us an- FAILURE We could take up an infrastructure other day. bill. We could take up legislation that Even before the first word is spoken (Mr. WILSON of South Carolina would assure every young person the this day, O Lord, guide our minds, asked and was given permission to ad- ability to go to community college. We thoughts, hearts, and desires. Breathe dress the House for 1 minute and to re- could take up the big questions that into the Members of this House a new vise and extend his remarks.) the American people expect us to ad- spirit. Shape this Congress and our Mr. WILSON of South Carolina. Mr. dress that are important to growing world according to Your design that all Speaker, the President’s State of the our economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion in Latin America and the Caribbean
    ABORTION IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DOMESTIC LAWS AND RELEVANT JURISPRUDENCE FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Ligia M De Jesus* I. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 2 II. ABORTION PROHIBITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN.........................................3 A. Abortion Defined...........................3 B. Involuntary Miscarriage/SpontaneousAbortion Distinguished ............. ............ 66........ C. ForcedAbortion. ................................. 8 D. FetalHomicide. .................................. 9 E. FetalInjury...................................... 11 F. Elective Abortion................................. 12 1. Criminal Sanctions for Mothers and Abortionists............12 2. Aggravating and Mitigating Factors ...... .......... 17 3. Attempted Abortion............................. 19 4. Abortifacients ................................... 19 G. Non-PunishableAbortions .......... ............... 22 1. "Life of the Mother" Exception...................24 2. "Health of the Mother" Exception........ .......... 26 3. Abortion of Children Conceived by Rape and Incest...........28 4. Eugenic Abortion ....................... 31 5. First Trimester Abortions .................... 34 6. Judicial Activism for Abortion Rights in Colombia.........38 7. Clinic Regulations, Counseling Requirements, and Informed Consent ........................ 40 8. Abortions on Pregnant Children and Disabled Women.......42 9. Full Abortion Bans............................43
    [Show full text]