<<

Sound Speed Marker: An Archeology of Cinema By Gene Fowler – August 3, 2015

The skeletal remains of Reata, the grand Their curiosities piqued by having seen facade of a Victorian mansion built near Wim Wenders’ 1984 Paris, while Marfa for the 1956 film Giant, stand like growing up in Australia and Switzerland, the crumbling bones of some impossible Hubbard and Birchler visited the small dinosaur that refused to fold into the earth. East Texas city of Paris, 20 miles south of Or some alien shipwreck that outlasted an the Red River, in 2007. There, exploring ancient sea, its creaking timbers moaning potential turf for their photographic series and defiant in the West Texas wind. Filmstills, they discovered the abandoned Grand Theater. With a history going back to The artist team of Teresa Hubbard and the era, the Grand and collective Alexander Birchler spent two years filming Parisian memories of the theater proved to the ruin in all seasons and weather condi- be rich in what Fairfax Dorn of Ballroom tions. Its ghostly presence and the landscape Marfa, writing in the Sound Speed Marker in which it lingers play major roles in their catalog, calls “the physical, social, and psy- three-channel video installation, Giant chological traces that movies leave behind.” (2014), part of Sound Speed Marker, a trilogy of video installations on view at the Interviews with local residents, from the University of Houston’s Blaffer Art Museum Paris News film critic to an elderly woman that also includes the two-channel work who ran the theater’s candy stand in the Movie Mountain (Méliès) (2011) and the 1930s, excavate and interpret the movie pal- single-screen Grand Paris Texas (2009). ace’s past. The camera lovingly documents old projectors, film reels, lobby posters, and prove the most compelling interview sub- other relics resting in situ in the theater jects. The odds and ends of their personal ruins. In a catalog interview, Hubbard notes spaces and the roadmap lines on their faces that the artists “took a risk in allowing the underscore an authenticity that shatters the circumstances of our research and the spec- clichés established by much of the Texas film ificities of the location to shape the form of canon. This is especially true for the trilogy’s our film.” second work, Movie Mountain (Méliès).

Thus, Wenders’ 1984 film itself becomes a In April 1911, a silent film company head- character in Grand Paris Texas. Musing on ed by Gaston Méliès (lesser-known brother the German director’s work, residents wres- of the famous filmmaker George Méliès), left its Star Film Ranch home in San An- tle with elucidating a storyline and theme tonio and headed for Hollywood by train. that, back in the day, vexed certain smar- En route, they stopped for a time at Sierra typants regional critics. Paris News critic Blanca in far West Texas, and according to Toni Clem had no such problem, describing local legend, shot a silent on a near- the 1984 film’s arc of estrangement and by rise in the desert plain. The site became aching sadness. She recalls a special red-car- known as Movie Mountain. pet showing of Wenders’ work at the Grand, as a fundraiser for restoring another historic Though Hubbard and Birchler unearth no Paris theater. Baffled that Paris, Texas bore smoking gun by conclusively proving the their town’s name even though no scenes shoot-em-up was made, it’s a much better were filmed there, many left the Grand that story because of the mystery. The artists night a little ticked off. gather wisps of memory and legend about the softly-fabled shoot. Christina Ramirez, The artists acquired the city’s lone VHS whose Apache ancestors moved north of the copy of Wenders’ film after learning that Rio Grande in 1910 to escape the Mexican the ending had been inexplicably taped over Revolution, shares family tales about her with a section from the 1925 silent film uncle José Sanchez and his friends, who are Tumbleweed, a King Baggot feature star- said to have ridden horses in the film. Inter- ring William S. Hart that screened at the viewed in the Sierra Blanca cemetery, Gary Grand in 1926. And for still more filmic Jennings’ account is supported by the silent serendipity, Hubbard and Birchler interview testimony of his grandfather Charlie Nor- Parisian Allan Hubbard (no relation), who ton, who often told his descendants about at age 9 appeared with in appearing as a roper in the storied flick. His the 1983 film Tender Mercies. Duvall came grandfather, Jennings says to the camera, to Paris for Allan’s birthday party after the “loved his horses more than people.” shoot wrapped, gifting the boy with his first guitar. The adult Hubbard’s fine guitar work Hubbard and Birchler film ranch workers soars in the Grand Paris Texas soundtrack. herding cattle near Movie Mountain with a simplicity that is mesmerizing as the The comments of another interviewee, animals and riders move between the two student Elric de la Pena, on the difference screens. One of the herders on horseback, between and movies, prove (for those a beautiful blonde woman in a black cow- who might need such proof) that one can boy hat, looks into the camera with a sure- experience cultural enrichment even when ness that establishes her as solidly as any living in the sticks. The old folks, however, of the men, further dissolving a century of cowpoke clichés. Another of the cowboys, re-creates a Warner Brothers David Armstrong, shares his own traces of office on February 9, 1955 as an actress the illusory spell of images and stories on portraying a secretary types the location silver screens. contract securing the use of the land on which Elizabeth Taylor and Rock Hudson’s In 1975, this same Armstrong appeared big-country crib Reata was constructed. as an in the film When You Comin’ Back, Red Ryder? shot in Clint, near El As one might when working in an indus- Paso. Telling the story with an appealing try devoted to creating fictional universes, aw-shucks tone, he relates that he and a the secretary often gazes into the distance, buddy then wrote their own Western film daydreaming. The scene shifts to the script and got an offer on it from a ma- ruin of Reata as all three screens fill with jor . But Armstrong the structure’s expansive location on the balked upon learning that he would not get Trans-Pecos plain. The artists engage both to appear in the film himself. “I always felt the vastness of the scene and its minutest like I could act,” the cowboy drawls. [Note details. A grasshopper, enlarged exponen- to David Armstrong: Hell yes you can act, tially, takes on a heightened visual reality. hombre. As Will Rogers said, “An The changing light through seasons and idn’ anything special. He’s just a fellow with hours relates some huge drama of its own a little more monkey in him.” Get your that we can only fully grasp through expe- monkey mojo workin’.] rience and memory. With the three screens spanning the long gallery, the viewer’s In the trilogy’s concluding piece, Giant, the immersion in the Reata-scape can take artists dispense with the interview process on a meditative quality. At several points, and instead explore the impact of the 1956 the immense horizon and sky disappeared Hollywood blockbuster Giant through a before I was ready to let them go, yanking bifurcated methodology. Part of the work me back from a timeless zone and into the not-unpleasant confines of the 1955 office. . The portrayal of these cultural artifacts could be seen as markers and placeholders In her catalog essay, Blaffer Art Muse- for people’s lives and experiences.” um director Claudia Schmuckli notes that each of the three films visualizes its Cabinet senior editor Jeffrey Kastner “productive dynamic through a recurring remarks that Hubbard and Birchler’s work image that materializes its protagonist’s presents an experience that remains with modus operandi.” Specifically, these re- him for an uncommonly long period of curring images are the 35-mm film reels time, as do “the stories the videos tell and seen in Grand Paris Texas, the cowboy’s the often unexpectedly moving ways they lasso in Movie Mountain (Méliès), and the tell them.” When I left the Blaffer, I felt I typewriter ribbon in Giant. could have watched each piece another 17 times, especially the last two, and still felt Indeed, the extensive close-ups of the keys enlivened and refreshed. Part of that sense, striking the ribbon and making a letter no doubt, is due to the invigorating chal- appear on the page provoke an uncan- lenge of the work. As Alexander Birchler ny response in one who recalls forming explained in a PBS Art21 interview, the words on paper in such a manner. It is, work encourages the viewer to “participate oddly, both foreign and familiar. And at in the authorship of the story.” this late date, the presentation of such language-making reminds me of the mys- Me? I like to make stuff up. And I suspect tery of petroglyphs, incised upon stone by that you do, too. human creatures one can only imagine. Images courtesy of the artists; Tanya Bonakdar Gallery, ; and Lora Reynolds Gallery, Austin “Obsolescence in its many forms is a recurring motif in our work,” explains Teresa Hubbard in the catalog interview. “In the Sound Speed Marker, we depict a procession of obsolescent technologies and the objects associated with them…