DOCSLIB.ORG

The Expansion of Russia in the Propagated Perspective of the Official Russia. Caucasus And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Expansion of Russia in the Propagated Perspective of the Official Russia. Caucasus And THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED BY THE GEORGIAN FOUNDATION FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES. The Expansion of Russia in the Caucasus and Georgia project offers the readers collection Editor-in-chief: Giorgi Cheishvili of scientific-popular articles which Editor-corrector: Tinatin Evdoshvili aims to cover the Georgian-Russian Project author: Irakli Gegechkori relations of the Designer: Tornike Bokuchava XVIII-XX centuries in a manner different from the widely propagated perspective of the official Russia. © Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies All rights reserved Ecclesiastical Relations RUSSIA’S EXPANSION IN THE CAUCASUS AND GEORGIA Between Georgia XX century and Russia Eldar Bubulashvili Relations Between the Georgian and Russian Churches from 1917 to the Present After the overthrow of Tsarism on March 25 (12), 1917, the Georgian clergy, in the presence of numerous secular figures, declared the autocephaly of the Georgian Church in the Svetitskhoveli Cathedral in Mtskheta. This was a cultural-political act of great importance towards the restoration of Georgian statehood. he temporary government of the Georgian Church was established under the leadership of Bishop Leonidas (Okropiridze). The temporary government, T along with the executive committee of the clergy and secular individuals, accomplished significant achievements for the recognition of autocephaly. They informed the Russian Provisional Government, the Russian Bishop Leonidas Synod, Exarch Plato (Rozhdestvensky) and the Provisional (Okropiridze) Local Transcaucasus Government about the restoration of the (1861 — 1921) autocephaly of the Georgian Church. The Russian Synod expressed a negative attitude towards delegation sent on behalf of the provisional government of the the autocephaly of the Georgian Church. It has accused Georgian Church: “I will report to the Holy Synod and wait for the Georgian clergy of violating the religious rights of non- its ordinance and meanwhile I will remain ... your Exarch and I Georgians living in the country. Exarch Plato did not obey will enjoy the right and the power of the Exarch.” The position the resolution of the Mtskheta Assembly either. He told a of the Georgian clergy was firm: “Regardless of the answer 1 Ecclesiastical Relations RUSSIA’S EXPANSION IN THE CAUCASUS AND GEORGIA Between Georgia XX century and Russia of Russia was also based on the fact that, following the directives from the Russian Synod, the former Exarch Plato and the Russian clergy in Tbilisi and instigated by them, the Russian congregation did not recognize the restoration of the autocephaly of the Georgian Church. The former Exarchate tried to physically confront the Russian parishes with the Georgian ones but this attempt was thwarted. After that, they demanded the establishment of the Caucasus Exarchate in Tbilisi under the Russian Metropolitan bishop which would incorporate the non-Georgian parishes. Exarch Plato (Rozhdestvensky) (1915 — 1918) The decision of the Russian Provisional Government was unacceptable for the Georgian we get, it will not affect us whatsoever and I once again repeat Church from a canonical point of view - the orally that from now on you will not be an Exarch and all of the organization of the church on the basis of functions of the Georgian Church will transfer into my hand,” nationality or phyletism was condemned by the said Bishop Leonidas. 1872 Constantinople Ecclesiastical Assembly. Despite the resistance of the former Exarch, the Georgian clergy severed all ties with the Russian Synod and the former Exarchate, and restored the liturgy in the Georgian language The decision of the interim government, from the and Georgian hymns in churches and monasteries. standpoint of the Georgian clergy, would hinder the peaceful Representatives of different strata of society, such as coexistence of Georgians and non-Georgians. Therefore, the clergymen, soldiers, teachers, doctors, writers, workers autocephaly of the Georgian Church had to be recognized on ... from various parts of Georgia (Kakheti, Kartli, Imereti, a territorial basis “within the borders of the ancient Georgian Meskheti, Artaani, Erusheti, Samegrelo, Adjara) welcomed Catholicosate” and non-Georgian Orthodox Christians were the restoration of autocephaly. Abkhazians, Ossetians and the granted “complete freedom of ecclesiastical self-determination Udis supported the Georgian Church. The Udis also demanded ... as an autonomous bishopric” which would be subordinated that they be subordinated to the jurisdiction of the Georgian to the Georgian Church by ecclesiastical laws. According to Church. Congratulatory telegrams were sent from European the firm beliefs of the Church and public figures, “the legal and Russian cities. status of the Georgian Orthodox Church in the Russian state The Georgian Church had to overcome many obstacles on had to be equal to that of the Russian Orthodox Church.” the way to legitimize autocephaly. This resolution was sent to the chairman of the Provisional Government of Russia, the ober-prosecutor of the Synod and the Transcaucasian Commissariat. On March 27, 1917, the Russian Provisional Against the demands of the Georgian clergy, on July 11, 1917, Government recognized the autocephaly of the Temporary Government approved the Provisional Rules for the Georgian Church in advance but decided the governance of the Russian Parishes in the Transcaucasus. that the Georgian Church should be governed The Caucasus Exarchate was created with the Russian and not by territorial but national principles. This non-Georgian (if the latter had a desire) parishes under its meant that the Georgian congregation would subordination. The Exarch of the Caucasus was awarded the be under the jurisdiction of the Georgian title of Metropolitan of Tpileli with residence in Tbilisi. Later, on Church and Orthodox non-Georgians living in July 25, the interim government approved the temporary rules Georgia would remain in the administration of for the condition of the Georgian Church in the Russian state. the Russian Synod. The decision of the interim According to the statute, the Patriarch of the Georgian Church government was proof that Russian politicians was referred to not as the “Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia were considering Georgia to be an integral part and the Archbishop of Mtskheta-Tbilisi” but as the “Archbishop of the Empire. of All Georgians and Mtskheta.” By this decision, the jurisdiction of the Georgian Church did not include non-Georgian Orthodox Christians living in Georgia. Tbilisi was also removed from According to the interim government, if autocephaly was the title of the Patriarch of the Georgian Church; however, recognized on a territorial basis it would contribute to the according to the approved regulation, Tbilisi was established establishment of an independent Georgian state. In addition as his residence. According to the same regulation, the to the above, the decision of the Provisional Government Georgian Church had a limited possibility for communication 2 Ecclesiastical Relations RUSSIA’S EXPANSION IN THE CAUCASUS AND GEORGIA Between Georgia XX century and Russia Bagrati Cathedral, photo from 30s of the XX Century with foreign autocephalous churches and relations with them were to be established only with the mediation of the Russian As a sign of protest, the Georgian clergy did Foreign Ministry. not take part in the workings of the Russian Both documents were fundamentally opposed to the Ecclesiastical Assembly in August 1917 as they ecclesiastical canons. In addition to phyletism, resolutions were invited not as representatives of the of the Provisional Government established in the same city Autocephalous Church but as Archbishops of (Tbilisi) the residences of two archbishops of the same faith, the Exarchate. the Caucasus Exarch and the Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia which was strictly forbidden by ecclesiastical law. The Russian Synod did not support the decision of the On September 8-17, 1917, the First Ecclesiastical Assembly Provisional Government, declared the restoration of the in Tbilisi ignored the demands of the Russian secular autocephaly of the Georgian Church graceless and called on and ecclesiastical authorities and, in full compliance with the Russian parishes of Transcaucasia not to participate in the ecclesiastical canons, approved the governing charter as well service of the Georgian clergy, not to accept blessings from as established the rule of the Church not on a national but a them and not to enter “Georgian churches” or else “they would territorial basis and elected Kirion II (Sadzaglishvili) as the certainly go to hell.” Patriarch who then reported the incident to the leaders of the After the approval of the interim rules, the situation in Eastern Orthodox Church (Constantinople, Antioch, Jerusalem, Georgia developed as follows: the Georgian clergy, contrary to Alexandria), the Pope and the Armenian Catholicos. Only the the decision, appointed Leonidas(Okropiridze), the Chairman Pope and the Armenian Catholics responded to his epistle. of the Interim Government of the Georgian Church and the The Russian Church and its newly elected pastor, the successor of the Catholicos-Patriarch as the Metropolitan Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, Tikhon (Belyaev), of Tbilisi on August 15. On the same day, the Russian Synod responded negatively to the appointment of the Patriarch of the appointed Plato as the Exarch of the Caucasus and declared newly restored Autocephalous Church of Georgia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of Conservation Report by The
    au_(_~ b.-,rl.-,~ooaa~(Y)b J'tJ~6'tJ~'tJ~o aaaJao~~a(Y)<'>Ob ~..,e aob a~(Y)a6'tJ ~o b.-,.-,0a66(Y) Georgian National Agency for Cultural Heritage Preservation(,i-1/J. " ..:.'d)___ 0 u (ri _ ..;._ ---------- 201s v· To: Mr. Kishore Rao, Director World Heritage Centre 7, Place de Fontenoy 75352, Paris 07 SP Dear Mr. Rao, In conformity with the decisions of the 38th session of t he World Heritage Committee, held in Do ha, Qatar in 2014, I would like to present for your consideration the State of Conservation report of the Bagrati Cathedral an d Gelati Monastery World Heritage Site as well as the State of Conservation and Progress Re ports of the Historical Monuments of Mtskheta World Heritage Site. On behalf of the National Agency for Cultural Heritage Preservation of Georgia, I would like to reiterate the deep commitment to the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Please, accept the assurance of my highest consideration. Nikoloz Antidze Director General (;" ~__.:, Annex 1: SoC report Historical Mo uments of Mtskheta Annex 2: Progress Report Historic I Monuments of Mtksheta Annex 3: SoC report Bagrati cathedral and Gelati Monastery 0105. J.m?loS!!_'o ho. m.'>6'Z}t!•'> 030S!!,'O h d· No5, (~lJR'· ( +995 32) 93 24 11, 93 23 94 5 Tabukashvili str. Tbilisi 0105. Tel.(+995 32) 93 24 II, 93 23 94 Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery, C 710 The present folder contains: 1. State of Conservation Report of the Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery, C710, Georgia, 2015 Annexes orovided on CD: Annex 1: Metodology report about conservation of building stones of the Early 12th-Century Church of the Virgin at Gelati Monastery in Kutaisi - Stefano Volta Annex 2: Engineering Technical Report Annex 3: Technical Report of the Restoration Works 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Book I. Title XXVII. Concerning the Office of the Praetor Prefect Of
    Book I. Title XXVII. Concerning the office of the Praetor Prefect of Africa and concerning the whole organization of that diocese. (De officio praefecti praetorio Africae et de omni eiusdem dioeceseos statu.) Headnote. Preliminary. For a better understanding of the following chapters in the Code, a brief outline of the organization of the Roman Empire may be given, but historical works will have to be consulted for greater details. The organization as contemplated in the Code was the one initiated by Diocletian and Constantine the Great in the latter part of the third and the beginning of the fourth century of the Christian era, and little need be said about the time previous to that. During the Republican period, Rome was governed mainly by two consuls, tow or more praetors (C. 1.39 and note), quaestors (financial officers and not to be confused with the imperial quaestor of the later period, mentioned at C. 1.30), aediles and a prefect of food supply. The provinces were governed by ex-consuls and ex- praetors sent to them by the Senate, and these governors, so sent, had their retinue of course. After the empire was established, the provinces were, for a time, divided into senatorial and imperial, the later consisting mainly of those in which an army was required. The senate continued to send out ex-consuls and ex-praetors, all called proconsuls, into the senatorial provinces. The proconsul was accompanied by a quaestor, who was a financial officer, and looked after the collection of the revenue, but who seems to have been largely subservient to the proconsul.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Georgian Architecture
    A SHORT HISTORY OF GEORGIAN ARCHITECTURE Georgia is situated on the isthmus between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. In the north it is bounded by the Main Caucasian Range, forming the frontier with Russia, Azerbaijan to the east and in the south by Armenia and Turkey. Geographically Georgia is the meeting place of the European and Asian continents and is located at the crossroads of western and eastern cultures. In classical sources eastern Georgia is called Iberia or Caucasian Iberia, while western Georgia was known to Greeks and Romans as Colchis. Georgia has an elongated form from east to west. Approximately in the centre in the Great Caucasian range extends downwards to the south Surami range, bisecting the country into western and eastern parts. Although this range is not high, it produces different climates on its western and eastern sides. In the western part the climate is milder and on the sea coast sub-tropical with frequent rains, while the eastern part is typically dry. Figure 1 Map of Georgia Georgian vernacular architecture The different climates in western and eastern Georgia, together with distinct local building materials and various cultural differences creates a diverse range of vernacular architectural styles. In western Georgia, because the climate is mild and the region has abundance of timber, vernacular architecture is characterised by timber buildings. Surrounding the timber houses are lawns and decorative trees, which rarely found in the rest of the country. The population and hamlets scattered in the landscape. In eastern Georgia, vernacular architecture is typified by Darbazi, a type of masonry building partially cut into ground and roofed by timber or stone (rarely) constructions known as Darbazi, from which the type derives its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte
    Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa was consecrated as the Roman Catholic Diocesan Bishop of Botucatu in Brazil on December !" #$%&" until certain views he expressed about the treatment of the Brazil’s poor, by both the civil (overnment and the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil caused his removal from the Diocese of Botucatu. His Excellency was subsequently named as punishment as *itular bishop of Maurensi by the late Pope Pius +, of the Roman Catholic Church in #$-.. His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord Carlos Duarte Costa had been a strong advocate in the #$-0s for the reform of the Roman Catholic Church" he challenged many of the 1ey issues such as • Divorce" • challenged mandatory celibacy for the clergy, and publicly stated his contempt re(arding. 2*his is not a theological point" but a disciplinary one 3 Even at this moment in time in an interview with 4ermany's Die 6eit magazine the current Bishop of Rome" Pope Francis is considering allowing married priests as was in the old time including lets not forget married bishops and we could quote many Bishops" Cardinals and Popes over the centurys prior to 8atican ,, who was married. • abuses of papal power, including the concept of Papal ,nfallibility, which the bishop considered a mis(uided and false dogma. His Excellency President 4et9lio Dornelles 8argas as1ed the Holy :ee of Rome for the removal of His Excellency Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa from the Diocese of Botucatu. *he 8atican could not do this directly. 1 | P a g e *herefore the Apostolic Nuncio to Brazil entered into an agreement with the :ecretary of the Diocese of Botucatu to obtain the resi(nation of His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord.
    [Show full text]
  • Exarch Josif I (1840-1915) (Real Name Lazar Yovchev) Is a Distinguished Bulgarian Orthodox Cleric
    Exarch Josif I (1840-1915) (real name Lazar Yovchev) is a distinguished Bulgarian Orthodox cleric. He was Bishop of Vidin, Metropolitan of the Lovech Diocese and Bulgarian Exarch – Head of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. Lazar Yovchev was born on the 5 of May 1840 in the enlightened town of Kalopher at the foot of the Balkan mountain. Studious and curious student during the primary school, he later became a teaching assistant of Botio Petkov, well known teacher in Kalopher and abroad. Supported by affuent Kalopher citizens living in Tzarigrad (Istanbul) he continued his studies in the Grand People’s School in Fener (in Turkish - Fener Rum Erkek Lisesi) and later in the French College (Tzarigrad). With the fnancial help of the Kalopher community he enrolled in 1864 in the prestigious Literary Faculty of the Sorbonne University (Paris). After three years study there he transferred to the Law School of the same university, which he graduated with a Bachelor degree and license to practice law. After six years in France, Lazar Yovchev returns to Tzarigrad and works at the Central Court of Commerce. In the same time he is active in political journalism and translation. He became a Board Member of the Macedonian Bulgarian Union (Makedonska Bylgarska Drujina). He was also invited to become a Secretary of the Joined Exarchate Council (Smesen Exarchiiski Syvet). Thanks to respect and popularity and without a formal ecclesiastical education, in 1872 the newly ordained monk becomes Coadjutor of the Exarch (equal to a Bishop reverence) under the monk name Yossif. In the next 3-4 years Bishop Yossif actively participates in the organization of the newly independent Bulgarian Church, travels the Bulgarian lands, meets representatives of the Great Powers, owing to his excellence in French, but mostly because of his ability to negotiate and persuade.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Day Georgian Holidays Cultural & Sightseeing Tours
    15 Day Georgian Holidays Cultural & Sightseeing Tours Overview Georgian Holidays - 15 Days/14 Nights Starts from: Tbilisi Available: April - October Type: Private multy-day cultural tour Total driving distance: 2460 km Duration: 15 days Tour takes off in the capital Tbilisi, and travels through every corner of Georgia. Visitors are going to sightsee major cities and towns, provinces in the highlands of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus mountains, the shores of the Black Sea, natural wonders of the West Georgia, traditional wine- making areas in the east, and all major historico-cultural monuments of the country. This is very special itinerary and covers almost all major sights in Tbilisi, Telavi, Mtskheta, Kazbegi, Kutaisi, Zugdidi, Mestia, and Batumi. Tour is accompanied by professional and experienced guide and driver that will make your journey smooth, informational and unforgettable. Preview or download tour description file (PDF) Tour details Code: TB-PT-GH-15 Starts from: Tbilisi Max. Group Size: 15 Adults Duration: 15 Days Prices Group size Price per adult Solo 3074 € 2-3 people 1819 € 4-5 people 1378 € 6-7 people 1184 € 8-9 people 1035 € 10-15 people 1027 € *Online booking deposit: 60 € The above prices (except for solo) are based on two people sharing a twin/double room accommodation. 1 person from the group will be FREE of charge if 10 and more adults are traveling together Child Policy 0-1 years - Free 2-6 years - 514 € *Online booking deposit will be deducted from the total tour price. As 7 years and over - Adult for the remaining sum, you can pay it with one of the following methods: Bank transfer - in Euro/USD/GBP currency, no later than two weeks before the tour starts VISA/Mastercard - in GEL (local currency) in Tbilisi only, before the tour starts, directly to your guide via POS terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Section II: Summary of the Periodic Report on the State of Conservation, 2006
    State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties in Europe SECTION II giving vast valuable data for the study of the written GEORGIA language in general and making it possible to deal with the origin of Georgian written language anew. Historical Monuments of Mtskheta As provided in ICOMOS evaluation Brief description The nomination dossier submitted by the Republic of Georgia was accompanied by a number of books The historic churches of Mtskheta, former capital of and other documents. Most of these are written in Georgia, are outstanding examples of medieval Russian or Georgian, neither of which is a working religious architecture in the Caucasus. They show language of the World Heritage Convention. The the high artistic and cultural level attained by this most useful book, Georgien: Wehrbauten und ancient kingdom. Kirchen, is in German, another non-working language. More importantly, the only map provided 1. Introduction showing the “Protective Zones of Mtskheta”, was a very small-scale photographic print of a much larger Year(s) of Inscription 1994 map; the barely decipherable legends were, in any case, all in Georgian. However, new maps showing Agency responsible for site management the areas proposed for inscription on the World • World Heritage National Committee, Ministry of Heritage List, together with buffer zones, were Culture supplied to the mission, together with a summary of 4, Sanapiros St., 0105 Tbilisi, Georgia the Georgian protection legislation, as required by E-mail: [email protected] the Operational Guidelines. Website: www.mc.gov.ge Recommendation: That this property be inscribed on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria iii • Mtskheta Museum-Reserve and iv: 54, Agmashenebeli St., Mtskheta, Georgia Phone +995 93 35 18 14 Criterion iii: The group of churches at Mtskheta bear testimony to the high level and art and culture of the vanished Kingdom of Georgia, which played 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Half Day Tours in Georgia
    Mtskheta half day tour Half day tours in Georgia Overview Mtskheta half day tour Starts from: Tbilisi Available: All year Type: Private Half day trip Duration: 4 hours Total Distance: 50 km A half-day trip to Mtskheta, tthe capital town of the former kingdom of Eastern Georgian includes visiting two UNESCO monuments: the Jvari Monastery of 6th c and the Svetitskhoveli Cathedral of 11th c. Walk along the narrow streets of the town and feel the spirit of medieval Georgia. Have a wonderful day! Tour details Code: TB-PT-HDM-01 Starts from: Tbilisi Max. Group Size: 15 Adults Duration: Half Day Prices Group size Price per adult Solo € 183 2 people € 99 3-5 people € 76 6-15 people € 49 *Online booking deposit: € 5 1 person from the group will be FREE of charge if 10 and more adults are traveling together Child Policy 0-1 years - Free 2-6 years - 25 € 7 years and over - Adult * Online booking deposit will be deducted from the total tour price. The balance can be done by: Bank transfer - in Euro/USD/GBP currency, no later than two weeks before the tour starts VISA/Master card - in GEL (local currency) in Tbilisi only, before the tour starts, directly to your guide via POS terminal. Card service fee +3% Cash – GEL only, directly to the nearest TBC Bank office or TBC Bank Cash terminal no later than the beginning of the tour. For a larger group or custom itinerary please contact us at tours[at]georgianholidays.com Tips for booking procedure: How to know which “Operator” to select? You only need to select the Operator name if you have previously communicated with one of our sales agents via phone or email, otherwise please leave it at default.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Orthodox Christianity: a Glocal Perspective
    religions Article Globalization and Orthodox Christianity: A Glocal Perspective Marco Guglielmi Human Rights Centre, University of Padua, Via Martiri della Libertà, 2, 35137 Padova, Italy; [email protected] Received: 14 June 2018; Accepted: 10 July 2018; Published: 12 July 2018 Abstract: This article analyses the topic of Globalization and Orthodox Christianity. Starting with Victor Roudometof’s work (2014b) dedicated to this subject, the author’s views are compared with some of the main research of social scientists on the subject of sociological theory and Eastern Orthodoxy. The article essentially has a twofold aim. Our intention will be to explore this new area of research and to examine its value in the study of this religion and, secondly, to further investigate the theory of religious glocalization and to advocate the fertility of Roudometof’s model of four glocalizations in current social scientific debate on Orthodox Christianity. Keywords: Orthodox Christianity; Globalization; Glocal Religions; Eastern Orthodoxy and Modernity Starting in the second half of the nineteen-nineties, the principal social scientific studies that have investigated the relationship between Orthodox Christianity and democracy have adopted the well-known paradigm of the ‘clash of civilizations’ (Huntington 1996). Other sociological research projects concerning religion, on the other hand, have focused on changes occurring in this religious tradition in modernity, mainly adopting the paradigm of secularization (in this regard see Fokas 2012). Finally, another path of research, which has attempted to develop a non-Eurocentric vision, has used the paradigm of multiple modernities (Eisenstadt 2000). In his work Globalization and Orthodox Christianity (2014b), Victor Roudometof moves away from these perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Pagan Survivals, Superstitions and Popular Cultures in Early Medieval Pastoral Literature
    Bernadette Filotas PAGAN SURVIVALS, SUPERSTITIONS AND POPULAR CULTURES IN EARLY MEDIEVAL PASTORAL LITERATURE Is medieval pastoral literature an accurate reflection of actual beliefs and practices in the early medieval West or simply of literary conventions in- herited by clerical writers? How and to what extent did Christianity and traditional pre-Christian beliefs and practices come into conflict, influence each other, and merge in popular culture? This comprehensive study examines early medieval popular culture as it appears in ecclesiastical and secular law, sermons, penitentials and other pastoral works – a selective, skewed, but still illuminating record of the be- liefs and practices of ordinary Christians. Concentrating on the five cen- turies from c. 500 to c. 1000, Pagan Survivals, Superstitions and Popular Cultures in Early Medieval Pastoral Literature presents the evidence for folk religious beliefs and piety, attitudes to nature and death, festivals, magic, drinking and alimentary customs. As such it provides a precious glimpse of the mu- tual adaptation of Christianity and traditional cultures at an important period of cultural and religious transition. Studies and Texts 151 Pagan Survivals, Superstitions and Popular Cultures in Early Medieval Pastoral Literature by Bernadette Filotas Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Aid to Scholarly Publications Programme, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Filotas, Bernadette, 1941- Pagan survivals, superstitions and popular cultures in early medieval pastoral literature / by Bernadette Filotas.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbot Suger's Consecrations of the Abbey Church of St. Denis
    DE CONSECRATIONIBUS: ABBOT SUGER’S CONSECRATIONS OF THE ABBEY CHURCH OF ST. DENIS by Elizabeth R. Drennon A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Boise State University August 2016 © 2016 Elizabeth R. Drennon ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Elizabeth R. Drennon Thesis Title: De Consecrationibus: Abbot Suger’s Consecrations of the Abbey Church of St. Denis Date of Final Oral Examination: 15 June 2016 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Elizabeth R. Drennon, and they evaluated her presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Lisa McClain, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Erik J. Hadley, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Katherine V. Huntley, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Lisa McClain, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved for the Graduate College by Jodi Chilson, M.F.A., Coordinator of Theses and Dissertations. DEDICATION I dedicate this to my family, who believed I could do this and who tolerated my child-like enthusiasm, strange mumblings in Latin, and sudden outbursts of enlightenment throughout this process. Your faith in me and your support, both financially and emotionally, made this possible. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Lisa McClain for her support, patience, editing advice, and guidance throughout this process. I simply could not have found a better mentor.
    [Show full text]